re: #77 Dark_Falcon

Bullshit. Any legal interpretation of the 2nd amendment, even the recent SC one still allows for reasonable limitations on gun ownership. I am not a lawyer but I think the only thing that’s been recently asserted is that outright bans are perhaps unconstitutional. I’m not going to bother to debate faith-based perceptions of gun-ownership and these angels on the head of a pin distinctions about whether or not an AK-15 with a huge clip that can fire at faster than 1/sec is an assault weapon or not. Whatever. I assert that gun-owners need to have coverage to pay for their responsibility. They’re not. You’re arguing for the optimality of the status quo. It’s not. You lose. People died. They lose. We lose.