re: #67 Gus 802

From their own literature they seem to have a neo-Reaganite thing going on. I was uncomfortable with some of the language about “preserving traditional American heritage” just because it came too close to racist codewords. I don’t think they’re a racist organization though. Some of the religious stuff isn’t my cup of tea but they seem more or less grounded in reality. Large contributions from Korea are interesting but I have no idea what to make of that.
If they are funding much of what is going on today (which I don’t think they are) they’re doing it wrong. Unless they see Ron Paul as the new Reagan their plan plan isn’t working.