re: #787 LudwigVanQuixote

And you know what Walter maybe that is all true. And if it was and you actually had something worth saying, you could have pointed out how my calling these religious nuts schizophrenic did not meet the definition in some interesting and clinical way. Someone with actual expertise might have tried opening with knowledge.

So you see, I am sure that for whatever reason you have an interest in this, and that is all good, but you are no expert and you certainly never open with any facts.

Further your very long history of confabulating facts with bullshit has come here to bite you in the ass.

Frankly you claim so much knowledge about so much and get so many very basic things wrong - and then you play such insipid word games rather than ever talking facts, that I would have difficulty believing you on pretty much any technical topic.

So short form, you think I misapplied the definition.

Good for you.

I don’t care.

If someone I would find respectable can tell me where I went astray then I would gladly take it as a learning experience.

Someone respectable in regards to the subject of schizophrenia did. You just missed it. I’m so sorry. I don’t care if you don’t believe that I have expert knowledge of the subject, I do.

And it wouldn’t have matter how I would have presented your hyperbole about diagnosing schizophrenia to you, you would not have accepted anything I had to say on the subject.

Doesn’t stop me from making my point.