Comment

Obama Botches Meeting with British PM

809
zimriel3/08/2009 1:20:20 pm PDT

re: #667 quickjustice

Obama’s defenders say he inadvertently messed up. His adversaries say he did it on purpose. Looks like you’re one of his defenders. Count me as being on the other side. Obama isn’t a stupid bungler. He wants to destroy this nation.

re: #684 Jimmah

That is insane…lol

Which part? Of course Obama wants to destroy the nation. That should have been obvious from the start.

Obama kept saying he wants to “change” the nation - in such a way that it destroys its character as the Federalists constructed it in the Constitution. He wants a nation more akin to the early French Republic: in which an elite wakes up one morning, decides what’s right and good, and then implements it by whatever means it decides to use. Read your Burke.

That doesn’t make Obama a Robespierre, necessarily; but I will note that Ayers is a Robespierre, and Obama spent a lot more time with Ayers growing up that he did with anyone sane.

Besides it’s happened before. It was also Woodrow Wilson’s aim to destroy this nation’s character, albeit more violently. Wilson almost succeeded. When you’re done with Burke read your Goldberg.

As to whether Obama has the ability to do it - I think that it’s all been theoretical to Obama up to recently, and that he’s now out of his depth. It’s certainly easier to destroy than to rebuild. Obama’s lengthy paper trail shows he did want to destroy the nation and then rebuild it. I think he’s going to fail horribly at the rebuilding, but given the nation’s divisions, he’ll succeed impressively at the destroying.

How was lunch?