your splitting hairs. I did read it.
your comment 808, makes no fine points, and creationism as defined in todays vernacular as talked about on charles blog really has a fairly narrow meaning. no evolution no earth older than 6000 years.
the people pushing this stuff believe they can show knights battling t-rex in a theme park like its the natural science and history museum.
which apparently tars (by your definition) even someone who beleives God was responsible for creating the universe thru a big bang and billoins of years of rules playing out to get to today, as creationists.