re: #83 Feline Fearless Leader

I can see two logic chains leading to this:
1. They think that by substituting physical punishment and release they save money on incarceration; e.g. “If we beat them then we don’t have to worry about them being parasites and getting arrested for free room and board.”

2. They believe that infliction of physical pain is better aversion therapy for crime than incarceration. Which essentially is following a assumption that criminal punishment is simply punishment and not in any way an attempt at rehabilitation.

In any case I suspect the consequences of the proposal being adopted have not been thought through. And that is not even starting to address the psychological issues.

SINGAPORE HAZ NO CRIME!1!