re: #52 zombie

But what about this crucial sentence in the article:

“He did not explain how his name came to be on the petition.”

Exactly how is he supposed to explain that? How would he even know how it got there?

This is wingnutty parsing of his statement. And since when is teh word of 9/11 troofers ever evidence for anything— unless it’s evidence that the OPPOSITE of what they claim is true?