“It’s very compelling,” Colby opined. “Only a kid who hadn’t had dental work could eat Skittles.”

I’m perplexed by this statement. Is Colby trying to say that, because Trayvon had dental work, he couldn’t eat the Skittles and therefore must have bought them specifically to use as a weapon? That a teenager with a bag of Skittles should be considered armed and dangerous? Please tell me that’s not what he was implying.