re: #91 Dangerman (misuser of the sarc tag)

Charles Blow makes the obvious point for the inovbious reason

Impeachment in the House is the victory

the senate conclusion was always foregone:

the real point has always been this (regardless of the senate R majority):

so

Well, it’ll be slightly different. Apparently the new belief is that McTurtle isn’t going to allow a single piece of evidence to be presented in the Senate and may even forbid statements—just a summary vote as soon as the articles are presented, to acquit.
The fiction will be that the House inquiry was presentation of evidence.

(Why yes, the Department of Injustice lawyers were the ones who originally floated this; why do you ask?)