re: #90 Sir John Barron

Me think the lady doth protest too much.

Also, does it seem rather strange to anyone else that Dana Mah Gunz is only “defending” the gun owners who are NRA members? Seems that more than 5 million Americans are gun owners, who would stand to be just as disadvantaged by new gun control measures, as would the actual five million NRA members.

On the other hand the NRA acts like it’s opposition to every gun control measure, large or small, is an act in defense of Western civilization.

It’s looking more and more like she’s scrambling to keep her job. She keeps escalating the rhetoric in order to defend the indefensible.