Fox News contributor Erick Erickson went one step further, saying nature itself commanded that women be subservient to men.
“I’m so used to liberals telling conservatives that they’re anti-science,” Erickson explained. “But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology, when you look at the natural world, the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, it’s not antithesis, or it’s not competing, it’s a complimentary role.”
“We as people in a smart society have lost the ability to have complimentary relationships in nuclear families, and it is tearing us apart,” he continued, adding that “reality showed” it was harmful for women to be the primary source of income in a family.
More: Fox Contributor: Liberals Who Reject That Men Should Dominate Women Are Anti-Science
This is all based on Erick Erickson’s personal view of reality? Yeah… that’s right wing science.
UPDATE at 5/30/13 9:52:09 am
Erickson doubles down on his stupid comments:
The word for which he is searching in vain is “complementary,” by the way.