“Accuracy in Media” winner’s pathetic attempt to spin leads commenters to spew white supremacism
At CPAC, the incredibly dense Jim Hoft won the “Accuracy in Media” award, and today he’s demonstrating the peerless skill that led to this honor with a post desperately trying to spin away the embarrassing little white supremacist incident at yesterday’s festivities:
BUSTED: Supposed ‘Racist Event’ at CPAC 2013 a Big Media Lie - Here’s the Truth | the Gateway Pundit
The liberal media today are reporting on an incident yesterday at CPAC 2013. K. Carl Smith, founder and President of Frederick Douglas Republicans, held a break-out session on minority outreach. During the question and answer period a young man identified as Scott Terry suggested that blacks should be grateful for the clothing, shelter and food provided by their slave masters.
Here is how Think Progreess [sic] reported on the incident…
Of course, Hoft never gets around to explaining the “Big Media Lie.” Here’s the punchline to his stupid post:
Now here’s the rest of the story…
I spoke with K. Carl and his brother Karnie this morning at the Tea Party Patriot Live booth in the main hall.
K. Carl Smith said how he was so impressed with the CPAC audience who immediately came to his young man defense during thee [sic] breakout session.
Possibly the weakest spin ever by a right wing moron. He’s not even trying. But Hoft’s commenters quickly leap into action, making his pathetic attempt to excuse this eruption of blatant racism look even more ridiculous — by spewing racism and white supremacism all over the place.
So where’s the beef? Blacks ARE grateful for the clothing, shelter and food provided by their slave masters so much so that they vote for them every election cycle.
Has the whole situation degenerated to the point where progressives and their media cohorts must plant people to create a controversy? If so, I guess it means the cries of racism and sexism and ism-ism can no longer be supported naturally.
Scott Terry’s Liberal message was on point. That’s the entire platform for the Democratic party. You won’t leave the Dem Party plantation if we keep giving you “free” stuff.
The average black Sub-Saharian African IQ is about 70 and the average brown “hispanic” IQ is about 80. In comparison, the average White European IQ is about 100. And anyone who’s read “The Bell Curve” knows that there’s a very strong correlation between race, IQ and general quality of life statistics.
From a purely scientific point of view, how does it make sense to flood high IQ White societies with low IQ brown people? So much so that White babies are now racial minorities in America, Whites of all ages are estimated to become racial minorities in about 20 years and brown “hispanics” are estimated to become the new racial majority by about 2050.
Wake up. This bipartisan supported demographic ethnic cleansing of Whites will not only completely destroy the Republican Party but also completely destroy Western (White) civilization this century. Stop being spineless politically correct cowards that are too afraid of being called racists to stop the libtard schemes of mass importing generations of low IQ left-wing voters in order to stay in perpetual power and spread global socialism.
So, if we’re going to allow immigration to America, it should primarily be Whites and Northeast Asians with high IQs, spotless criminal backgrounds and advanced college degrees. And if they go on welfare or commit a violent crime within 10 years, they should be deported back to their native countries.
But even though Northeast Asians have IQs close to Whites, I still don’t support allowing them to mass immigrate to White countries since I want to preserve our racial majority.
And before you denounce these policies, keep in mind that Japan and South Korea already implement similar policies. If they can do it, why can’t we?
As to the study which showed that people with “conservative”, religious and racist views tend to have slightly lower IQs than “tolerant” “liberals” and atheists; I’d have to look at the demographic data to come to an objective conclusion. But regardless, even if racists did indeed have slightly lower IQs than “anti-racists”, that still doesn’t debunk peer reviewed scientific facts that bolster racist views - like the widely observed racial IQ gaps making it idiotic to allow low IQ races to mass immigrate to your society.
I support creating a White Nationalist state where non-Whites are denied citizenship. Or at the very least non-White immigration is severely restricted. And before you reject such policies, what’s the alternative? To allow the demographic genocide against Whites to continue?
slaves in America could have been instead shipped east to muslim nations where all the males are castrated before arrival killing 80% of the males, and the females are sent to hard toil and random rapes and torture.
I feel so sorry for the blacks that were captured in Africa by Arabs and African rulers and shipped out as property.
The luckiest 5% of of the total of just the Atlantic slave trade (not the larger Arabian trade) ended up in North America.
I say lucky because food, shelter and the ability to continue to have children and raise families is an anomaly in the history of world slavery while it was legal in America.
Black Slaves in America had it better than the 1.5 million whites slaved by the Barbary muslims in north Africa.
About Scott Terry - CPAC Slavery Defender and ‘Disenfranchised Whites’ Illustrated
At ‘Minority Outreach’ Panel, CPAC Participant Defends Slavery