Kids discuss the legalization of gay marriage.
This episode featured the following kids.
Dominick, age 6
Lucas, age 7
Sydney, age 7
Maxim, age 9
Samirah, age 9
Addy, age 11
Caden, age 11
Tyler F, age 11
Claudia, age 13
Dylan, age 13
Elle, age 13
Music by: Cormac Bluestone
Kids React #132 - Gay Marriage Ruling
Kids React to Gay Marriage Ruling
(c) Fine Brothers Properties 2015
This format and title of this program is protected under Copyright and Trademark Law and may not be emulated or re-created in any way without express consent in any territory worldwide
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the right - particularly the Christian right - is once again apoplectic (although honestly, when aren’t they apoplectic about something?), and the House that Andrew Breitbart built, better known as the hate site named breitbart.com, is failing to disappoint this morning.
So without further adieu, here is Breitbart Schadenfreude Volume Whatever, the Marriage Equality Edition (extended dance remix):
Once God became banished, this desent into immorality was inevitable.
I fear that America, as founded, is done. God save us.
Better look out now - the gays are coming for you. And the Section 8 housing people, and they’re gonna take down the flag next, and socialized medicine, and other groups we can hate, like little kids with dark hair, and people who speak a second language, and people driving FIAT cars, and well, anyone not born in suburban Texas.
I mentioned this on a post related to Obamacare yesterday, and I think it holds relevant today. The globalists have won (for now) folks. The country has been hijacked.
What we ought to be doing is studying how people resisted a tyrannical government over the long haul. A recent case that I think would bode well for us is the Polish non-violent resistance to Soviet occupation.
Make no mistake. It will take time to take the country back. But it can and will be done. Because the inherent inconsistencies of totalitarian liberal policies ALWAYS present themselves.
I’m going to say this in my best lisp so all of you homosexuals will understand.
Go phluck youthelfs.
This decision brings new meaning to Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Push Organization.
We should feel sorry for them, Kennedy is encouraging them to continue acting strange instead opf snapping out of their psychotic-delusions …
God made human beings and He was pretty clear about how sex was supposed to be used.
1. Marriage only-husband and wife-man and woman.
2. Two made one flesh and children were to come of the union.
3. The husband was the protector and provider and the wife is the interior creative designer and worker to provide the home for the family.
4. Two men or Two women cannot equal One Man and One Woman.
So, the Gay Agenda is a lie that is meant to attack God. Since they reach Him, they go after Christians.
This is all part of the process to declaring Christianity “hate speech” or something. Just watch. I guarantee the end targets of all this are Christians.
The government must eliminate the ideals of Christianity (love, truth), as well as the ideals of the U.S. Constitution (liberty) in order to establish their luciferian one-world fascist-communist government.
Christians and gun owners - do you feel the target on your back yet? They will come for you.
Does this ruling now mean that Mischelle will declare its real sex?
The elite are behind the gay agenda as it contributes to depopulation, their goal.
What needs to be said is that gays are NOT equal and neither are the relationships they engage in. Children need a mother and fatherfather adadhaving good analanalysis 2 men having anal sex is against the laws of nature.
States rights are trod upon by the federal government once again.
The Founding Fathers warned of such a government. It is time again for each state to decide if it wishes to remain a part of this country in which the federal government views itself as more important than the citizens and the states that make up this country.
Anything the Liberals want and goes before the SCOTUS will be handed to them on a silver platter. Next will be gun control.
Definitely he is coming for guns
Absolutely he is….and the churches.
If marriage is a “right - one that is not tied to children and one that has no definition - then, by logical extension, those who have “natural” attractions to children, their own family members, to multiple people and even animals MUST now be allowed to “marry.”
Let the beasties, the furies, the pedophile and pederast, and the polyamorous celebrate! They shall not be denied their “love.”
Throuples, monogomish, marriagish, N @ Mbla….oh, they joys of life unhinged from morals and reality.
IT’S MARTYR TIME, CHRISTIAN BROTHERS!
I’m the owner of a business in the wedding services industry. I WILL NOT provide services to mentally ill, sexually dysfunctional, vagina-phobic anus/rectum-philes and penis-phobes who want to pretend they’re “married”. If they want to marry a member of the opposite sex as many sexually dysfunctional, vagina-phobic anus/rectum-philes and penis-phobes have done in the past, I will gladly provide them service.
My heresy will inevitably result in the hate-filled, bigoted and fascist Gaystapo or the state’s attorney general initiating religious persecution against me. I will not appear at any legal hearings inquisitions by my persecutors as this would be an admission that they have the moral authority to deprive me of my 1st and 13th Amendment rights. This will result in a default judgement against me entailing a massive fine and perhaps even jail time. A lien will be placed on my home and eventually the Gaystapo’s minions of fascist tyranny will come to take possession of it. I can promise you this: They will be met with a fusillade of full-metal-jacketed lead. As Patrick Henry said, “Give me liberty or give me death!” I would rather die with my bleed-out cooling the hot, spent cartridges from my still smoking hot barrel knowing I’ve taken out some of the fascist enforcers tyranny than to cower under the jack-boot of SCOTUS and the Gaystapo, and I will dispatch as many of their enforcings minions to Hell before they murder me.
This nation, over the past decade has been drafting their own death warrant via corruption, and lawlessness. Today, they signed that death warrant, the US, or any other nation for that matter cannot survive insanity like this, as Justice Scalia pointed out, we now have a nine member oligarchy determining how and what we can say, think, and do. A national disgrace.
Thanks’ to government schooling a majority of folks do not understand the Fourteenth Amendment. In my quest through our history step by step I found this explanation that cleared any misconception I had previously thought and was taught in ‘GOVERNMENT’ school’s.
14th Amendment Citizenship: Citizen = SLAVE
Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th Amendment, there was no legal definition of a “citizen of the United States”, as everyone had primary citizenship in one of the several states. The Constitution referred to the sovereign state citizen, and no one else. Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside the several states were commonly called “citizens of the United States.” In the Constitution for the United States, the term was used to identify state citizens who were eligible under the suffrage laws to hold office, and they were required under the Constitution to have primary allegiance to one of the several states.
Funny you mention the 14th amendment. According to the men who authored it, the Kenyan Turd is not a US citizen. Sotomayor and Kagan were appointed by an illegal alien. Now sodomy and deviance has been normalized. This nation is in deep trouble.
Next up they Next up they will try and force the Catholic church to perform gay marriages.
Everything on the supreme court should take a bullet !
I was at the medical clinic this morning for blood work and the TV had ABC news on in the waiting room. One of the commentators running off at the mouth about the polls showing millions of people supported this marriage farce. I commented to the people in the waiting room, “Funny how those millions of people never voted for this. This is being imposed on us by the courts.” The truth is this is just another round in the culture war being waged by the left against the country. They will be going after people’s religious beliefs namely the churches next. If you thought it was bad for the odd baker or florist or pizza shop owner. Well you ain’t seen nothing yet, now they have a really big target to go after. That being God himself.
As the 1st LGBTQ-POTUS LowBama will be celebrating at Mans Country Bath House with Rahm, Reggie, Boehner, Frist, Graham, GWB, Hastert, Foley, B.Frank …
It’s politicians not regular citizens who do this more by-%. That’s why they go far in politics bcs they can be controlled by the hidden controlling elite who have evidence of their deviant-behavior-activities … Liberal-Lowbama is sort of close to Rahm and Reggie …
RL was O’Bolo’s personal assistant on the campaign-trail and in the WH, from 2008-2011, and they both went on vacation together in 2011 without M-Obama.
2-2013 - Obama Vacationed Alone with Reggie-Lv Bans Media from Taking Pictures
Is this the end of the gay agenda? I wish I could say “yes”, but unfortunately the global elite aren’t done with their useful tools. Don’t get me wrong, I love my gay friends & family, I just don’t like the social engineering & the indoctrination of school age children, in days gone by, that would’ve been considered grooming.
flags displaying 2 homosexuals getting married - encircled with a slash -
will now be banned
flags displaying 2 homosexuals getting married - encircled with a slash -
will now be banned
The bent wrist society are doing their little giggle dance - A mighty sick sight!
This is terrible until you consider how states bastardize the 2nd.
GET READY FOR THE NEXT BLACK, GAY WOMAN PRESIDENT! HILLARY? LMAO
I wouldn’t be surprised if she came out as a transracial. She sure likes her fake accents.
Well we already have a transgender in the WH….
look, conservatives, at least you get to keep your guns. guns are cool, focus on that. be happy.
You might regret that
Now is the time for war.
If they are on the Left, kill them.
This is why young Earth creationist Ben Carson will never be President of the United States; his grasp of history and government is… tenuous, to say the least: Ben Carson Invokes Dred Scott Decision as Precedent for Ignoring Supreme Court Rulings.
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson raised eyebrows last week when he told Newsmax that a potential Supreme Court ruling to legalize same-sex marriage across the country would not have to be implemented, because “the laws of the land come from the legislative branch.”
It’s not a commonly held opinion, given that the high court has long asserted the right to invalidate laws it deems unconstitutional, and no other presidential candidate has suggested that the court’s ultimate ruling on same-sex marriage could be ignored.
During a Republican gathering Saturday in Greenville, S.C., Bloomberg asked Carson to explain his assertion.
“What I would really love to see, as the Constitution states, civil matters being taken care of in the state and the states.”
“Probably the best thing to do is go back and read about the Dred Scott case,” Carson responded, referring to the 1857 case in which the Supreme Court validated slavery; today it is widely viewed as the worst ruling in the Court’s history. “And as you know, President Lincoln wasn’t too much in favor of that. And his policies indicated that. Clearly it created a lot of division. We ended up fighting a war over it but in the long run it was the right thing to do.”
Here’s an open thread to follow the news around the Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby case.
Will SCOTUS really endorse the religious right’s cynical, perverse inversion of “religious freedom?” I have a bad feeling they will.
Breaking: SCOTUS holds govt can’t require closely held corps w/ religious owners to provide contraception coverage
Video: Rachel Maddow on the Horrible SCOTUS Decision Allowing Anti-Choice Protesters to Harass Women
The video included in this clip, showing a group of “pro-life” activists celebrating the murder of a doctor and a clinic escort, is absolutely horrifying.
Another awful Supreme Court decision today extends the Citizens United disaster and further erodes America’s political system by striking down aggregate limits on campaign contributions; according to the new ruling, wealthy individuals may now contribute as much as $3.6 million to a single politician.
The decision — written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito — held that “aggregate limits are invalid under the First Amendment.” Justice Clarence Thomas concurred with the other conservative justices but penned a separate opinion arguing that campaign finance restrictions should be wiped out further.
The conservative justices argued that eliminating aggregate cont limits doesn’t give rise to “quid pro quo corruption” which the court recognized as a legitimate rationale for campaign finance restrictions in the landmark Buckley v. Valeo case in 1976.
“Spending large sums of money in connection with elections, but not in connection with an effort to control the exercise of an officeholder’s official duties, does not give rise to such quid pro quo corruption,” Roberts wrote in the ruling. “Nor does the possibility that an individual who spends large sums may garner ‘influence over or access to’ elected officials or political parties.”
The law currently permits individuals to spend no more than $2,600 per election per candidate, allowing for up to $5,200 for a primary and general election. The aggregate limit is $48,600 on contribution to candidates for an election cycle, and $74,600 on campaign committees. The Supreme Court ruling keeps the individual limits and eliminates the aggregate limits. Supporters of the law noted that without limits, a single donor could contribute as much as $3.6 million to a single politician between giving to candidates and committees.
The legality of government collection of telephone metadata has been settled for a long time, so it isn’t really surprising that the Supreme Court turned down a direct review of FISA today.
The type of review requested (a “mandamus” review) is rarely granted.
The Supreme Court on Monday passed up an opportunity to weigh in on the constitutionality of the National Security Agency’s collection of a massive database containing information on virtually every telephone call made to, from or within the United States.
The justices’ action makes it unlikely the high court will provide a definitive answer on the question during its current term.
Acting without comment or indication of dissent on Monday, the justices turned down a petition from the Electronic Privacy Information Center seeking to have the Supreme Court perform a direct review of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order authorizing the call-tracking program under the PATRIOT Act—a controversial anti-terrorism statute passed a few weeks after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
The surveillance issue could reach the high court through a variety of other vehicles. The Justice Department pointed to three civil lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and conservative legal activist Larry Klayman.
The ACLU, the EFF, and lunatic Larry Klayman. Strange bedfellows indeed.
10:24 AM ET
Supreme Court strikes down part of DOMA, dismisses Prop. 8 appeal
We’re getting key decisions from the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage
Rulings on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Proposition 8 could affect how states and the federal government handle marriage equality
Part of DOMA was struck down, and the way is cleared for same-sex marriages to resume in California
WOOP WOOP WOOP!
The Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act on Tuesday, the provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of the country must have changes to their voting laws cleared by the federal government or in federal court.
The 5-4 ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, found that “things have changed dramatically” in the South nearly 50 years after the Voting Rights Act was signed.
The court’s opinion said it did not strike down the act of Congress “lightly,” and said it “took care to avoid ruling on the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act” in a separate case back in 2009. “Congress could have updated the coverage formula at that time, but did not do so. Its failure to act leaves us today with no choice but to declare [Section 4] unconstitutional. The formula in that section can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance.”
Congress, the court ruled, “may draft another formula based on current conditions.”
“Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions,” the majority said.
“There is no doubt that these improvements are in large part because of the Voting Rights Act. The Act has proved immensely successful at redressing racial discrimination and integrating the voting process,” Roberts wrote.
That’s why we’re gutting it, Roberts didn’t add.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder addressed the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act.
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Section 4 of the landmark Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional and that Congress was tasked to come up with a new way of determining which states and localities require federal monitoring of elections.