LGF

-RetweetDuke University Antisemitism Watch

Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 8:46:56 am PDT

Following Duke University’s hosting of the Palestinian Solidarity Movement (a pro-terror, radical Islamist group), Duke’s Chronicle newspaper publishes an astoundingly vile piece of antisemitic writing by Duke senior Philip Kurian: The Jews. (Hat tip: gwlaw.)

You are not required to complete the work, yet you are not allowed to desist from it.

—Pirkei Avot (The Book of Principles), 2:21

Such describes the Jewish concept of Tikkun Olam. Perfecting, preparing or repairing the world: a credo that, to many Jews, prescribes what role they should play in the wider concerns of our society. Judging by the opposition to this past weekend’s Palestine Solidarity Movement conference, however, I cannot help but conclude that the powerful Jewish establishment has distorted the meaning of this age-old teaching.

It is well known that Jews constitute the most privileged “minority” group in this country. Among the top 10 universities, Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation: Only the California Institute of Technology has an undergraduate Jewish population below 10 percent, and four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.

In his slim volume The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000), Jewish-American historian Norman Finkelstein argues that American interest in Judaism is “a tribute not to Jewish suffering but to Jewish aggrandizement.” The holocaust label, he says, arose from the real suffering of European Jews during the 1930s and 1940s, in turn giving rise to the Holocaust ideology, distinguished in its capitalization. He documents economic exploitation by this “Holocaust Industry,” which he calls an “outright extortion racket.”

Advertisement

589 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Kylaer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:48:45am

Here comes the new Judenhass, same as the old Judenhass.

2 alegrias  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:50:32am

Kurian will be on the faculty soon.

3 tedzilla99  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:50:52am

Vile...this is what's being taught at our universities, people!

4 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:53:59am

I'm going to rephrase a comment here that I made on another post:

Why is there so much uproar in the MSM about Moslems being discriminated against, when we're facing, yet again, the demon of antisemetism---and this time, not from right wing facists, but from those loving, tolerant, oh-so-broadminded denizens of the liberal, progressive left? (I guess I just answered my own question; for the MSM, "Right Wing antisemetism bad, Left Wing antisemetism good".)

Talk about ignorning an elephant in the living room! This is a fire breathing, venemous dragon! We have got to wake up and oppose this, or WW II is going to seem like a jolly little Sunday School picnic, before this is over and done with!

5 Lune  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:54:58am

unrelated new story

MEMRI TV Project: Secretary-General of the Egyptian Labor Party: 'Those Who Bomb Fallujah Cannot Prevent Me from Bombing Los Angeles'

[Link: www.memri.org...]

6 bush's babe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:02am

Why do you think I changed Majors... These FREAKS run most of the poli sci departments. I couldn't deal with them and the progressiveness; IE hate. I am not say I know he is a poli sci major but BOY does he write like one of the looney toons I use to have to sit by in class.

7 cordy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:09am

That citing of Jewish overrepresentation--typical of leftist thinking. If any group is overrepresented it must be some sinister plot and/or they must be using it to oppress others. Hence this guy thinks quoting the Jew-stats is automatically some damning evidence against them. Hence Soros apologizing for being a rich Jew.

I wouldn't be surprised if Jews were disproportionately successful, at least in some fields, in other societies too, before they were wiped out. Hence the Hitler complaint of "Jewish" physics.

And to quote Finkelstein?

8 Fredster  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:37am

My Mouth falls open.

Apparently we see something very vile sprouting up in this university.

9 cordy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:43am

Oh, not that I think Jews will be wiped out here (in the U.S.)

10 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:56:25am

Read this very carefully, Kurian.

Julius Streicher: Follow his path, share his fate.

11 Cole Slaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:56:32am

#2 alegrias

That's pretty funny.

12 mad_scientist  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:57:19am

What the hell are these KIDS being taught that makes them hate the Jews so much and sympathize with the Pali's??

In my days in college (which was only 6 years ago) I dont remeber this much hatred being on display. Maybe I was to drunk to realize it...but there was some liberal bias in the teachings, but nothing like what I read about today.

These institutions are supposed to teach our kids to go out into the world and contribute via the sciences and arts. Yet all I see coming out of MOST of these cesspools is a crop of professional protestors, and wanna-be victims.

13 APH  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:57:36am

The Jewish students at those schools didn't get in through affirmative action or Holocaust guilt, if that is what this assclown is implying. Can't trust anyone that relies on Normal Finkelstein.

14 GoatGuy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:57:38am

Ah, the old ruse...

Jews are "privilaged", which explains the disproportionately large number of grad students of Jewish extraction in the most notable Universities of the land.

But what ever happened to the idea that Jews culturally are driven to academics, the professions, business and entertainment due to their long history of almost outrageous dedication to schooling, learning the Talmud, encouraging outgoing 'performance' art, and generally being among the world's most irrepressible bons vivants?

I mean, Mr. Wingnut could have easily replaced "Jew" with "Asian", and have been just as or more righteous about the issue. Or, Kurian could have easily decided to single out Republicans (who are disproportionately represented amongst the masters and graduate students at most universities). Why not these?

It is so simple: because of all the groups on the planet that have a sense of self, the Jews have a most self-critical view of their culture. You don't hear of a bunch of Republicans saying "Gee... maybe we aren't the greatest, maybe we've made our share of mistakes". You don't see the whole of the Asian community saying, "Gee, maybe we are a bit to driven, too (whatever)".

So, insofar as I can tell...

"Status normal: nothing to see, move along"

GoatGuy

15 Padre  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:58:05am

Jews, on the aggrogate, are white people. What's the fuss? He/she with the highest test scores, skills, and extra-curriculars gets the fat letter in the mail.

Just say "no" to affirmative action.

16 Killraven  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:58:13am

I don't get what this shmuck is saying. Too many Jews in Ivy League schools? We have a culture where education and human life is valued.

We come bearing the gifts of Fonzie, Seinfeld, and Joey Ramone. We're contributing to America, here. Geez.

17 Innismir  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:58:26am

I got sick to my stomache reading that load of tripe.

Ugh. I want to take a shower now.

18 Buck  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:59:28am

Aggrandizement?

What kind of word is Aggrandizement?

"The act of aggrandizing, or the state of being aggrandized or exalted in power, rank, honor, or wealth; exaltation; enlargement; as, the emperor seeks only the aggrandizement of his own family."

Does he possibly mean that the top 10 universities, where as he put it "Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation", it is because the admission boards are pre-dispossed to accepting Jews? That somehow jews are given power and rank in admissions? It is not based on test scores? Grade point averages? Nope, just if you were lucky enough to be born into a jewish family.

What a nut case, and worse, a dangerous nut case.

Aggrandizement?

19 applesweet  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:59:44am

OT

So, it this left wing or right wing?

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Kidnappers seized the British-Iraqi head of an international charity group in Baghdad Tuesday and later she was shown sitting anxiously and alone in a video broadcast by an Arabic television station.

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

20 Dave Ray  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:59:54am

I hope there are counter demonstrations and mass opposition to these people on the campus.

21 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:00:56am

When I see stuff like this, I wonder:

Did we really win WW II, or will that conflict, ghastly as it was, turn out to be a (comparatively) small battle in what turns out to a much ghastlier, bigger war as those forces that hate all life try, once again, to wipe out those of us who love it!

/And, of course, for the life-haters, the Jews are going to be at the top of their little list---they always are. The Jews love life.

22 flehman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:01:01am

I believe this comes from two sources:

1 Islamiztation of world believes. The Radical islamist are pushing Jew hatred onto all of society

2 Socialist are pushing a value and religion free society so they are attacking Jews and Christians to push them out of the mainstream.


Fritz's Thoughts

23 cordy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:01:21am

#12 mad_scientist

One thing I think really changed the dynamic--9-11. Then "Muslim" became synonymous with "victim", no mater where they were or what they did, no matter how moderate or radical, and those opposed to radical Islam became the enemy.

I think they were anti-Israel before but 9-11 really let them express it without fear and solidified what their new cause would be since South Africa and defense of the Soviet Union.

24 ibrodsky  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:01:52am

I wonder if Mr. Kurian believes Jews are "overrepresented" at these prestigious universities because they are outstanding students or their parents possess undue influence?

If the former, does he advocate discrimination to counterbalance their success?

If the latter, does he have any evidence--or just the psycho-babble of Palestinian terrorist supporter Norman Finkelstein?

25 Bob G.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:01:53am

If you follow the link, you can enjoy the privileges white skin affords you and post feedback to the article.

26 Cy_Kologis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:02:14am

OT:

Folks, I just heard Deroy Murdock talk on KSFO about his new website HusseinAndTerror in which he details the extensive connection between Hussein and Al Qaeda. It's worth checking out. Here's a money quote:

Thus, there is abundant and undeniable evidence that Saddam Hussein provided money, diplomatic services, shelter, medical care, and training to terrorists of every stripe, including those complicit in the 1993 WTC bombing and — according to a Clinton-appointed federal judge — the September 11 attacks. The Iraqi dictator aided al-Qaeda and other global terrorists who murdered Americans, both at home and abroad.
27 cordy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:02:22am

Actually, I guess the way some vilify Turkey, not even the more moderate Muslim nations get credit. It's only the radicals.

28 Lune  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:02:35am

on #5

I linked it up before watching it, YOU MUST WATCH IT!!!

(i meant to type news and not new)

29 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:03:18am

#19 applesweet

It's the Hate-Life Wing.

30 traveler  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:03:44am

There's a good book on the subject of the hijacking of our universities by liberals...

[Link: shop.wnd.com...]

Now they've fully indoctrinated Duke University students into full blown anti-semitic, pro-terrorist propagandists.

They must be so proud.

31 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:04:59am

There's already a letter to the editor about this, in today's Duke Chronicle:

Representation of Jews flawed

No matter the college percent population or the amount of monetary funding a group has or can offer illegitimates a person or a group’s right to actively disagree. Although Phil Kurian’s flawed column, “The Jews,” tries to tiptoe around it, he echoes the very idea that has fueled anti-Semitism for decades.

The 92,000 people who signed the petition are not identified as Jews, but as people of conscience who object to an organization that refuses to condemn terrorism. And I would imagine that many of the signers were black, white, Asian, Jewish and Christian. As much of the world, and this country in particular, fights a global war on terror, this very sentiment, whether or not you agree, should be allowed and understood.

Even worse is when Kurian tries to diminish anti-Semitism since most Jews do not have the visible differences that many other minorities who face racism have.

Jews certainly cannot “renounce their difference by taking off their yarmulke.” They do not wear their religion and heritage simply upon their heads. They have an identity, although it might not be totally visible, just as ingrained as African-Americans and other minorities.

Racism and anti-Semitism both continue to resonate throughout the United States and the world. And while it is obvious that there is a distinct difference between the two, both are sentiments that must be battled, and the sensitive feelings many have towards them should be respected even if they are not understood.

Judd Fastenberg

Trinity ’08

32 N.A. PALM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:05:03am

#7 G Soros, and all the other leftist jewish people who will vote for Kerry are discrediting themselves greatly.

Why would they do this? Did they vote for Hitler too?

Confused, not anti-semitic...

33 just right of middle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:06:16am

OT

Sinclair DC Bureau Chief fired

[Link: www.wtopnews.com...]

Mr. Leiberman complained that the show was an effort to sway the election. The article didn't mention whether or not Sinclair was following CBS's practice of using fabricated evidence...

34 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:07:02am

As a white man, this comes as a bit of a relief.

/sorry, couldn't resist

But seriously, this is very dangerous. If the campus thought police take their hate speech codes seriously, and not just as a weapon to shut down any opposing viewpoints, which they don't, they should crack down on this stuff now. I'd say they should crack down before it gets violent, but it's too late for that.

35 Smitty  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:07:09am

Many above have said it much more succinctly than I can but it seems to me that Jews value education. As a result, they enjoy higher percentages of university enrolment, higher percentages in professional fields, and yes, higher percentages of Nobel awards. Oh, the horror...

36 applesweet  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:07:58am

TalkinKamel #29

Ummm, maybe this creature has more than two wings?
I wonder what they intend on doing with her?

37 traveler  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:08:15am

#33 just right of middle

Mr. Leiberman complained that the show was an effort to sway the election. The article didn't mention whether or not Sinclair was following CBS's practice of using fabricated evidence...

Exactly. And funny how those pro-Kerry idiots never actually want to address the evidence put forth -- they only want to whine it'll hurt their boy in the election. Why don't they ever counter the evidence?

Because the truth is the truth and they can't.

38 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:08:20am
Only the California Institute of Technology has an undergraduate Jewish population below 10 percent, and four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.

Uh, Mr. Kurian, wouldn't that be consistant with Tikkun Olam?

39 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:10:00am

To: richard.brodhead@duke.edu
Subject: "The Jews", Duke Univ. Chronicle, Oct. 18, 2004
Date: 10/19/2004 11:38:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Richard Brodhead
President, Duke University
207 Allen Bldg
Durham, NC 27710
(919)684-2424
richard.brodhead@duke.edu

Re: "The Jews", Duke Univ. Chronicle, Oct. 18, 2004 ( [Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...] )

Mr. Brodhead:

I must denounce in the strongest terms the Jew-hating polemic in your University's newspaper: "The Jews", Oct. 18, 2004 by senior Philip Kurian.

If "Jew" were replaced with "black" in such a gratuitously inflammatory and deeply racist article, you'd have violent protests at your University.

Has your University no decency? What kind of person are you to allow your University's name to be disgraced through support of racism?

I am going to forward this message to as many colleagues as possible in academia and in the press, both conventional and new media.

Sincerely,

ScotSilv

40 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:10:59am
Only the California Institute of Technology has an undergraduate Jewish population below 10 percent, and four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.

Alright, time for some Jewish parents to start encouraging their kids to apply to Cal Tech. ;-)

The Kurians and Pat Buchanans of the world will just have to live with it.

41 ibrodsky  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:11:19am

22 flehman

Yep, the Muslim world has not skipped a beat in its admiration of Adolph Hitler...

IMO, this is one of the biggest untold stories. Racism is inherent to, and widespread throughout, the Muslim world. And the West is responsible for making Muslims feel that their racism against Jews is justified. Treating the Palestinian terrorists as different from Al-Qaeda can only lead to the conclusion that Jewish civilians uniquely deserve to be mass murdered.

As LGFers know, racism, hatred, oppression, and brutality are rife in the Muslim world. And so it will be until the followers of that vile religion are forced to reform.

42 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:12:26am
Why would they do this? Did they vote for Hitler too?

Oh please.
Why don't you go focus your gaze on the near 50% of americans who are going to vote for Kerry.

Why the fuck do you care so much who the jews are going to vote for, or are you lining up a scapegoat in the event Bush loses 'cause of FL?

You've brought this up in several threads.Something here stinks.

43 Reader2  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:13:53am

Does anyone know if Bala Ambati is still writing opinion pieces anywhere?

Duke's Chronicle could use his sane voice again.

44 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:14:28am

I thought Ranbutan's last name was Kennedy?

45 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:15:24am

#42 Maine's Michael

You've brought this up in several threads.Something here stinks.

Big time. This individual bears watching.

46 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:15:43am

The leftist Jew-hating attacks and antisemitic University indoctrination must stop - now - before Jews are forced to take matters into their own hands.

My family, for one, used the JDL years ago to bash heads (quite literally, with nunchoks) of Jew-hating hoodlums who were obstructing my father's pharmacy. Several required hospitalization.

I do not want to see this type of action - or worse - become necessary again in this country.

47 locutus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:15:47am
48 L88Vette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:16:04am

Ok, this klutz makes some good demographic points about the "overrepresentation" of Jews in elite colleges (the same could be said for high-paying sectors of the economy: law, finance, Hollywood, etc).

Of course, there are other groups that are over-successful: Chinese-Americans, Korean-Americans, Thai and Indian-Americans, etc.

I don't see what the problem is.

Oh wait...if you believe that the purpose of government is to TAKE from those who HAVE (money, sucess, etc), then it stands to reason that Jews -- even if most are liberal and/or Democratic -- are an oppressive class. And if you are going to UP the numbers of blacks and other politically correct "minority" groups, then it stands to reason that some groups are going to lose.

In the past, those groups weren't identified: whites, males, white ethnic Catholics, Italians and Irish, etc. Now it appears that Jews -- despite being a staple of the Democratic Party and among the liberal elite in most major cities of the USA -- are going to be targeted.

Not unlike what I predicted, along with the fate of Israel in the Democratic Party. Liberal Jews who thought otherwise were fooling themselves. When they bought into this whole "victimization, anti-Apartheid, diversity" baloney, they bought the WHOLE package. You don't get to pick and choose.

Caveat Emptor.

49 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:16:22am

Who is Norman Finkelstein?

50 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:17:21am
Among the top 10 universities, Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation

This is mostly due, of course, to blatant cultural bias in the SATs. Or have we forgotten all those dredel-related SAT math questions, or the requirement to conjugate the verb esn?

Hey Phil, Jews are "shockingly overrepresented" at top universities because they frickkin' well achieve. This is a concept with which you will, of course, be unfamiliar.

51 Spiny Norman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:17:40am

#44 Ed Moran, recipient of hate mail from HWSNBN,

Ranbuchanan, you mean? Apparently he has minions.

52 Loyd Dobbler  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:19:13am

I'm so sick of these jews being all, uhm, smart and successful.

53 Curt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:20:57am

NEA has been at it so long that we have left all the children behind (well, at least this one) in a big way. He's sensitive (about his hatred), but believes all sorts of fairy tales...interesting. Maybe more history should have been taught.

I'm trying to figure out how he thinks having 6 million of your cultural group eliminated in a methodical, anal-retentive manner is something that just cause people to take advantage of the "rest of us" for no good reason.

I liked the part about being over represented. I recall it took me being prodded to get off my butt in the second semester of senior year to apply to college, just so they'd let me in. Seems to me it's all about choices and socail engineer not coming along and telling you to do something you don't care for. Next thing you know, he'll advocate going and pulling people out of their jobs and forcing them to attend colleges and universities, all in the name of some bizarre conceptualization of "fairness."

He's funny, in a very sick sort of way... does he have a shaved head and swastika tattos? Wait! That would make him part of the VRWC...and liberals can't have that! LOL

54 Dave Ray  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:21:12am

Let's all hope that the commies at Duke wake up like this guy did!

Confessions of an ex-Commie

55 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:21:40am

OT

It's not up on their website yet, but:

In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

The Canadian Islamic Congress Friday Bulletin
Tuesday, October 19, 2004 - Ramadan 5, 1425, Year:7 Vol:7 Issue:120

THE CANADIAN ISLAMIC CONGRESS
MEDIA COMMUNIQUÉ

October 19, 2004

FOR THE SAKE OF HUMANITY AND WORLD PEACE, ISLAMIC CONGRESS URGES AMERICANS TO VOTE GEORGE BUSH OUT OF OFFICE ON NOV. 2

Two weeks before the American presidential election, the Canadian Islamic Congress believes it speaks for many Canadians of all backgrounds in urging their American neighbours to vote George W. Bush out of office. It is chiefly the current administration's policies that have bred ongoing death, destruction and misery in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine and made the world unsafe for Americans and all of us.

Since Bush took office four years ago, countless civilians in all three countries -- young children, women and men -- have died agonizing deaths. As the carnage continues, we cannot even begin to get accurate information on how many human lives including Americans are being sacrificed daily to Washington's policies. Not only has the Bush administration continued the decades-long oppression of Palestine; they have added Afghanistan, and then Iraq, to the mounting toll of unreported deaths in the name of "freedom."

It is time for Americans to stand up and reclaim the real seat of power in the Oval office of the White House. It is time for all citizens to unite around true democracy, to honour their nation's historic Declaration of Independence, their Constitution, and the high moral ideals upon which their country was founded.

President Bush has clearly forgotten, or never knew, the lofty principles upon which America took root. He has made no effort to work in good faith with the United Nations or the international community to contain terrorism and overcome injustice. On the contrary, policies carried out under his watch have provoked even more terrorism in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Citizens of the U.S. and all other countries deserve better from the American administration.

Four more years of the same belligerent stance toward the rest of the world will serve only the rich, the powerful, and the tyrannical, who want only to exploit and exhaust both the human and natural resources of
this planet. The inevitable result will be more death, destruction and human misery, with weaker nations bearing the brunt of fewer options and dwindling resources.

For the sake of world peace and for the good of U.S.-Canada relations, the CIC hopes and prays that George W. Bush is decisively voted out of office on November 2.

56 Just right of Middle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:21:43am

I think it is wonderful that the school would print such an article. Why? It reveals the hatred that is engendered within so many people. Our Constitution explicitly states a freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In principled fashion, the paper printing Mr. Kurian's diatribe should have allowed an opposing viewpoint. I suppose that would depend upon whether the paper was interested in a frank discussion of opinions or was interested in mindless race-baiting.

Apparently, Mr. Kurian is a good scholar ([Link: www.bnduke.org...] It appears as though one of the things he didn't learn "while growing up black" was tolerance. Unfortunately hatred does not care about race or academic ability. It can develop anywhere.

57 The Dread Pirate Gryphon  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:21:48am

I was working in a restaurant in Charlotte in the early 80s, and one evening I got into a religion discussion with an African-American gospel Baptist who worked there as a dishwasher. He was very interested in Judaism, and after an evening of easy back-and-forth about our differing views and the history of our religions (and the things we shared, religiously and liturgically speaking) he looked at me and said, "You know what your problem is? Everybody thinks you're white!"

58 morganfrost  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:22:52am

I particularly enjoy the suggestion that Jews ought to be mindful of our privileges and behave ourselves. I guess we might have our privileges revoked if we get too uppity!

59 forever banned  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:23:35am

scotsilv - excellent posts! i will take off your letter to richard brodhead in writing my own. thanks.

60 Buck  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:23:56am

The same Philip Kurian wrote "The case for a new affirmative action" in Janurary of this year.

He is obsessed with who else is getting an education.

61 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:24:53am

A little bit of sophistry in the piece. He claims he would support the right of the Ku Klux Klan to organize a political meeting on campus, but something tells me if the Campus Republicans or similar group tried to organize a big conference, he'd be the first out there protesting.

62 urban shocker  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:25:03am

Geez.. yet another person to cross off the list of people I admire/like/listen to:

Mike Krzyzewski
KRS-One
Alan Parker

63 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:25:43am

(#49) Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C

A poli-sci "professor" at Depaul.

This is how he describes himself.

64 SupplyGuy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:26:04am

How does anyone know how many Jews are enrolled in any given institute? All of the forms that I had to fill out that asked my ethnicity never asked if I was Jewish, just white non-hispanic.

Now, allowing that the statistics are true, instead of decrying the Jews for their disproportionate enrollments, the Jew-haters would do better to ask what the Jews are doing better and then try to emulate their success.

The only real question to ask is how long is the Jewish community going to support a party that hates them so much?

65 Drudoggy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:26:16am

This student is a blatant RACIST and is a disgrace to the
Duke student body. He writes his opinions as if they were fact, without actually doing any research into the matter. And, siting some statistics about the percentage of Jews at specific top universities, does not qualify as research. This student has no future as a writer in the real world, unless he wants a job with the KKK. Veryoffensive!

66 JohnAnnArbor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:26:19am

Philip Kurian.

Wonder if he's Armenian.

If so, wonder how he feels about Turks.

67 Earl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:28:13am

#31 SoCalJ

I'd edit Fastenburg's letter by referencing Jew-hater in lieu of anti-Semite. Otherwise, he's on the right track- although, had I wrote the letter, I would have directly identified kurian as a Jew-hater.

kurian is beneath contempt. Jew-hater.

68 The Angel Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:28:21am

OT
"Spanish police have detained seven people in an operation against a network of alleged radical Islamic activists in Almería, Valencia, Málaga and Madrid. Police say it's thought the group were planning to park a lorry packed with 500 kilos of explosives next to the National Court in Madrid."

[Link: www.typicallyspanish.com...]

- I thought voting for Zapatero's Spain and pulling Spanish troops out of Iraq would prevent a terror attack in Spain ever again.

/LLL delusional mindset

69 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:29:12am

My respect for Duke is dropping by the minute:

Duke Senior Philip Kurian Wins Melcher Award for Excellence in Journalism

DURHAM, N.C. -- Duke University senior Philip Kurian has been named the 2003-04 recipient of the Melcher Family Award for Excellence in Journalism for "Journeys in South Africa," an article that reflects on his immersion in the lives of two Cape Town families.

The award will be presented Saturday, Oct. 2, at the Centennial Gala for The Chronicle, Duke’s student newspaper, by Duke’s DeWitt Wallace Center for Communications and Journalism.

Kurian’s article, which appeared in the October 2003 issue of The Chronicle magazine "Towerview," explored in-depth issues of racial identity, analyzed the progress of apartheid reforms and compared and contrasted racism in South Africa and the United States. Kurian said he sought the experience in order "to immerse myself in a society wholly committed to the healing of its collective wounds."

"We received some excellent submissions for the Melcher Award this year, but Philip Kurian’s stood out," said Duke’s Associate Vice President of News and Communications David Jarmul, a selection committee member. "He wove together on-the-scene reporting with personal reflection in a compelling examination of social changes unfolding in South Africa. It’s difficult to sustain this kind of narrative in a long magazine piece, but Philip pulled us in and made us care about the people he was describing."

Don't expect him to be taken to task by the Duke administration over his blatant Jew-baiting.

70 uvaprep  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:30:51am

we do well academically because we haven't done manual labor since the pyramids in 2500 bc.

seriously, though, the same argument that the Ivy's were "overrun" with Jews was made in the early 1900's. Harvard especially went out of their way to limit the number of Jewish students to pacify the WASP-ocracy.

71 Carl B  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:31:13am

Somewhat OT:
These people are of the same mindset as the ACLU. According to CNN, the ACLU turned down over $1 million from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because "ambiguous language in the grants could foster impediments to free speech." What is that ambiguity?

The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that "promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state."

The Rockefeller Foundation's provisions state that recipients of its funds may not "directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity."

Those lunatics are concerned such language will prevent them from defending the rights of all Americans. Thank God the president can recognize a terrorist and defend Americans from them!

72 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:31:32am
73 Spiny Norman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:32:20am

SoCalJustice,

They have a well-worn headline cliche at Fark.com that seems especially appropriate:

Duke Sucks
74 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:32:49am

59 forever banned

Brodhead was Dean of Yale College before he went to Duke.

He was one of a number of Yale officials who ignored my pleas for help when two Yale senior professors tried to misappropriate my intellectual property and defame me when I resisted, aided by a Yale associate general counsel (lawyer) who had never passed the Connecticut Bar Exam.

Yale is the University whose "Divest from Israel" campaign spokesperson is Rod "Captain Kink" Swenson.

[Link: www.opinionjournal.com...]

Who Is Rod Swenson?
At Yale, as at several other Ivy League colleges, there's a fringe movement to divest the university from Israel. The Yale Daily News reports that the "alumni spokesman" for the divestment campaign is one "Rod Swenson MFA '69." According to the Web site of the defunct punk-rock band the Plasmatics:

With credentials that included an MFA from Yale, and creation of the legendary Captain Kink's live sex show theatre in Times Square, the Plasmatics was put together in 1978 by radical anti-artist Rod Swenson around lead singer Wendy O. Williams.

Williams, who died in 1998, "was a shock-rock queen who rose from the ranks of the porn industry where Rod Swenson, her companion of over 20 years, featured her in the live sex shows he promoted," according to this biography.

75 militarybrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:34:00am

My buck o'five (and I'm not feeling particularly generous):

Sir:

I read, with disgust that nearly made me vomit, the vile tripe published in your school newspaper by a Duke senior. Apparently, your university not only gives known associates of terrorists a platform to gather and discuss their hatred of Jews and the state of Israel, now open hatred disguised thinly as something scientifically studied due to it's use of statistics and percentages is used to support a completely idiotic conclusion is published as racist gospel in your paper.

I'm curious, had the description "Jews" been replaced by "African Americans," would that have been an acceptable article to publish? Were it to discuss how Asians are in colleges in disproportionate numbers to their presence in the general population as some sort of "take-over" attempt, would that be considered perfectly legitimate?

I find it difficult to understand how someone can take a cultural ethic of working hard to better the world and turn it on it's head to mean something sinister, but perhaps Mr. Kurian just wants an excuse for the fact that so many students just DON'T CARE enough to do well in school and make it so far.

Antisemitism is on the rise in the world right now, and your school is contributing to it. There is no excuse for this. It was institutions such as yours, and people such as those who remained silent while Mr. Kurian spouted his garbage that were responsible for allowing the Holocaust to happen. I would think that an academic institution such as yours, with something called a history department, would remember this and the cry, "Never Again!" would mean something to you. It seems, however, that your school would stand idly aside as so many did in the 1930s.

Shame on you, if you have any shame left.

76 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:34:01am
The holocaust label, he says, arose from the real suffering of European Jews during the 1930s and 1940s, in turn giving rise to the Holocaust ideology, distinguished in its capitalization.

Just what the hell does this mean? Is this asswipe actually suggesting that the systematic murder of millions should NOT lead to any sort of "ideological" reaction?

He documents economic exploitation by this “Holocaust Industry,”

"Jews!"... "economic exploitation!"... This is just loathsome.

Four pro-Jewish, full-page advertisements appeared in the Friday, Oct. 15, edition of The Chronicle, with two directly condemning the PSM.

"Pro-Jewish"??! Your mask (thin as it was) just slipped, Phil. I guess the speech you favor, then, could be described as "anti-Jewish"?

77 Ben B  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:34:18am

One more paragraph and the Protocols would have been wheeled out.

78 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:34:31am

(#73) Spiny Norman

Sounds like a Tarheel chant. ;-)

79 Atlas Wannabe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:35:38am

What a POS. No mention that perhaps the representation is appropriate given the level of accomplishment of the students.

Over-represented my ass. That POS is overrepresented in the gene pool.

80 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:35:38am

Here's something really creepy. I've been reading a biography of Ezra Pound, the poet and raving Jew-hater who, during WW2, broadcast poisonous anti-American propoganda over Italian radio--like Lord Haw Haw did in Berlin. Pound, though a gifted poet and instrumental in the careers of such modernist luminaries as James Joyce and T.S. Eliot (no slouch in the Jew-hating department himself) may well have been one of the most insufferable writers in history. The combination of a poor education and overweening self-importance made him susceptible to many of the crackpot theories popular at the time. He was especially consumed by notions of racial purity and monetary reform, and, as often occurs, the synergy between the two helped fuel a thorough-going and hysterical hatred of the Jews.

Anyway, the creepy part is that in his April 9, 1942 broadcast, Pound said the following:

I think Roosevelt belongs in an insane asylum now. His writers are lunatics. You have come down far when a Jew by the name of Finklestein runs your country.

I don't know to whom Pound is refering, but it totally creeps me out that his last name is the same as the self-hating Jewish "historian" who today is assisting our enemies.

81 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:36:09am

#4 TalkinKamel

TalkinKamel, the outcome for the left will likely be a little different this time around. Here's the kind of diversity many American Jews believe in:

[Link: www.thoseshirts.com...]

82 Azure  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:36:42am

"Regardless of your political stance or position on the PSM conference, it is impossible to ignore the unprecedented outpouring of pro-Jewish, pro-Israeli support in defiance of free speech at Duke."

Does this mean that anti-Jewish, anti-Israeli rhetoric is what constitutes free speech at Duke?

#14 GoatGuy
I had the same idea about Asians, et al. But anyone else in this context would not serve the purpose of this writer's ideology.

83 Barking Pumpkin  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:38:12am

#41 ibrodsky

You are correct about racism being rampant in the Muslim world. Please correct me if I am wrong but it is my understanding that in Arabic the words for "black man" means "slave".

84 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:38:48am

All I can say is we as Jews are headed for mighty rocky times.

I am grateful my dear parents and grandparents are no longer here to witness this. They fought Anti-Semitism all their lives. They fought it in honor of the slaughtered and for their children and the future they truly with all their heart, with their eyes wide open thought would be much different then it is today. How truly shocked, brokenhearted and thoroughly disappointed they would be.

I must add that by legitimizing the palestinian struggle for a homeland and not having deemed the PA a terror organization was a large factor which led to all of this in the first place. By legitimizing the palestinian struggle it served to delegitimize the plight of Israelis and Jews everywhere. It made us into monsters. All to appease the arab street who hate not only Jews but Christians and freedom loving people everywhere.

Wake up call!! When truth becomes lost and unimportant the cancer of hate and lies sinks its roots deeply and securely. G-d help us all.

85 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:38:53am

This Philip Kurian guy has quite a problem with the "privileges" that Jews have.

It is well known that Jews constitute the most privileged “minority” group in this country. Among the top 10 universities, Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation ...

However, to preserve our democracy and honestly confront inequality where it persists, Jews must own up to their privilege in America, and use it more wisely.

privilege: a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor

privileged: 1. having or enjoying one or more privileges 2. not subject to the usual rules or penalties because of some special circumstance

He's implying that Jews are disproportionately successful because they're somehow granted special favors, and NOT because their culture values, oh, say, academics, or hard work, or the ability to make money, or whatever.

As another poster above mentioned, Asian-Americans seem to share many of these traits, but you don't hear assholes like this biatching about them.

To continue my paean to Jamie Glazov, here's a link to his December 3, 2001 article Why Jews Succeed .

I grew up not realizing that antisemitism really still existed in this country outside of a few hundred neo-Nazi nutjobs. Reality is a sad slap in the face, I tells ya.

My son is 1/8th Jewish, and this guy can go to hell.

/I wanna be like Moishe

86 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:39:38am

SCJ

Finkelstein's bio says both his parents survived the camps.


I take it from how Kurian quotes him, however, that he believes Jews use the Holocaust to lay a guilt trip on people.


While I suppose that is possible, in theory, the fact that Jews are targetted throughout Europe, are clearly targetted by Muslims everywhere, and even now face an uncertain future in the one Jewish nation on Earth (at least if their neighbors have anything to say about it), tends to discount that.

I know Jews as a group tend to be successful in this country, but I have never seen evidence that they have used Holocaust guilt toward that end. They value education and work hard.


I suppose one can say one of the impeti for the formation of the Israeli state was Holocaust guilt, but how is that a bad thing? Finkelstein's own biography has the quote

He dedicated his first book to his parents in which he wrote: "May I never forgive or forget what was done to them."


Really, I don't understand his motivation.

87 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:39:59am

80 scaramouche

Perhaps the deranged reference is to Rabbi Louis Finkelstein:

[Link: www.bookrags.com...]

As the head of the largest denomination of Judaism in America, Rabbi Louis Finkelstein served as an adviser on Jewish affairs to President Franklin Roosevelt (1940-1945).

88 Clio  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:40:17am

This journalist does not even cite a source correctly.

"Pirke Avot" does not mean "Book of Principles".
It means "Ethics of the Fathers".

89 abu_garcia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:44:56am

It is easy to recognize that this moonbat is not as much anti-semitic as he is an inhabitant of that parallel leftist Bizarroworld where earned advancement is a "priviledge".

exorbitant Jewish privilege in the United States
After World War II, overt anti-Semitism gradually subsided, in part because of American response to Hitler’s murderous regime, but largely due to Jewish association with whiteness and the privileges white skin affords.

I bet his views on the reconquista would make the folks at La Raza as happy as the Paleos.

90 alegrias  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:46:07am

John Edwards, report to your home state of Jihadi North Carolina & shake that gorgeous head of hair that drives Muslims wild.

Maybe they'll follow you like the Pied Piper back to the medieval ages & zenith of 7th century Islamic culture, or turn your state into the new center of Islamic wisdom in America.

91 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:46:10am

Somehow our higher educational system has become the new Khmer Rouge. The only 'good' people are uneducated peasant farmers. Give them guns and let them mete out 'justice'.

Life is not a zero sum game. Other people having great success has made my life easier, NOT more difficult.

92 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:47:10am

anyone no whether david duke is related to the founder of Duke University James b Duke?

93 transient  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:49:33am

Re #34

If the campus thought police take their hate speech codes seriously, and not just as a weapon to shut down any opposing viewpoints, which they don't, they should crack down on this stuff now.

I've been out of college for some time so the whole speech code thing is a mystery to me. Does anyone have access to, specifically a link to, any Duke Univ. code against hate speech? Is there any documentation of hate speech that has been previously repressed (against, say, Muslims, Arabs, blacks), based on such codes?

Specific reference to such codes IMO would be a more powerful argument in one's letters to Duke.

Kurian is only one example of the resurgence of antisemitism, always latent in Western society. The question is what is society today willing to do to fight it, before it reaches a catastrophic level. Fighting it means speaking out against hatred, and Duke, as a prestigious university, must openly face the question of whether they consider it acceptable, free speech not withstanding, to hate Jews, but not Muslims, and if so, why? And if not, what action are they prepared to take?

94 Clio  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:49:33am

Sorry -- In Post 88 I should have said "Sayings of the Fathers" not "Ethics of the Fathers". (But the Sayings are ethical.)

95 TS  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:50:48am

In the editorial Philip Kurian also says that he wouldn't oppose a KKK conference at Duke. So, imagine what his article would be titled instead of "The Jews" if it had been a KKK conference instead of a PSM one.

96 Powderfinger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:51:54am

#88 Clio

"Pirke Avot" does not mean "Book of Principles".

That's not what they said over at Stormfront!

Maybe they lied to me because I'm black

/kurian

97 mad_scientist  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:52:12am

Listening to Glenn Beck now...he is talking about why Jews want to vote for Kerry. The last lady who called said that she FEELS Kerry has a "plan" for the security of Israel, and that he is for Israel more than Bush is.

Can this lady be more wrong, and is she typical of the majority of Jewish voters since they consistently go Democratic??

98 Zach  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:53:46am

#85 Lewis, bravo well said.

I have married into a Jewish family (although my household is Christian) and feel insulted when I see this kind of dross.

The new antisemitism coming from the left is disturbing to me.

Socialism abhors those who work hard and profit from it.

These assholes think if you've managed to make something of yourself then it must have been some sort of fluke or conspiracy or anything except taking risks and putting in the hours.

Maybe, just maybe, the Jewish race is a bit more motivated than say, the average thick-skulled caucasian like myself (just kidding).

It's sad that many Jewish people are still under the spell of wealth-redristribution schemes and are in favor of special treatment for certain minority groups, globalization of governmental functions (aka liberal politcs)

99 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:55:44am

I have read this exerpt a few times and I found it devoid of point. How and why does the author make a case for the overrepresentation of jews in higher education, and then jump in the next paragraph to a "Holocaust Industry?"

I am sorry, but I don't see Kurian driving home any point... Maybe that is the point Charles is making, but you guys should enlighten me some more...

100 zulubaby  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:56:02am

This is so depressing. I can't believe what's going on at Duke.

101 abu_garcia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:56:30am

#24 ibrodsky

I wonder if Mr. Kurian believes Jews are "overrepresented" at these prestigious universities because they are outstanding students or their parents possess undue influence?

I would wager that he thinks they are outstanding students because of their priviledged position in society which inculcated in them a sense of self esteem (all must bow to the great juju, self esteem), everything being determined by class struggle.

102 alegrias  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:58:02am

#97 Mad_scientist

Wonder if the MSM and LLLs are goint to celebrate in large print Arafat's endorsement of their candidates & comrades, Breck & Lurch.

Yaser Arafat wants you to vote for John Kerry!

He approves of Kerry's "plan" for all of you...oh, and "death to Amerika," as David Letterman's Osama/Al Zawahiri videos always say in closing.

103 Smit  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:00:01am

Nuke Duke?

/really

#44 Ed - Yup, you're right, this screed sounds like R@nbutan, and now I'm having flashbacks to "shyster laywers" and tax the rich rants.

Ugh.

104 tgibbs  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:00:10am

As a non-Jewish academic in a scientific field, there is no question that Jewish people are heavily over-represented among my colleagues. But I have never encountered any hint of favoritism. It is simply a reflection of merit. Whether that reflects culture or some genetic predisposition (a very politically incorrect hypothesis), it would require active discrimination to erase it--and the quality of academic work would suffer as a result, because it would mean discrimination against some of the most capable individuals.

105 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:00:39am

I just read this whole thread and I think there's some hyper-ventilating going on.

College papers are notorious for publishing tripe like this. Every group that offends the leftist orthodoxy gets their day on the op-Ed page.

I interpret that Mr. Kurian is African-American, and the African American's are routinely puzzled/offended/angered by "model minorities" who've outperformed them without the aid of affirmative action; it makes them look bad. You could substitute "Asian" for "Jewish" in Kurian's screed, complete with all the same Ivy league overrepresentation statistics, and publish the same damn letter next week (less the Holocaust references).

(As a matter of fact, probably the sole reason that CalTech had to be excluded from his argument is that the Asians there outnumber the Jews).

Life as usual in the academy. No reason to panic yet.

106 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:01:22am

#36 applesweet

Maybe it does have more than one wing---or maybe it has no wings at all; it's all one, big, hate-filled blob, that sometimes calls itself "Left" and sometimes calls itself "right."; the Nazi/Marxist totalitarian movement, that's caused us all such grief in the 20th Century.

I've no idea what they're planning for this poor woman, though I can't think it's anything good; I hope she survives, and returns to her friends and family, though I can't say I'm real optimistic about this.

107 Tumulus11  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:01:41am

' It is well known that Jews constitute the most powerful "minority group" in this country. '
Philip Kurian 2004

' It is an open secret that Jews do not work, rather let others work for them. ... "The influence of the Jewish spirit" today dominates the United States of North America. '
Der Sturmer 1944

. Nauseating.

108 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:03:14am
109 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:03:26am

#93 transient
I think this is it Based on a quick (very) perusal of it, it sounds like they tried to pattern it on federal sexual harassment statutes.

Please ignore the "academic freedom" proviso at the top. Just read what really matters below.

Creating a "hostile environment" is one of the worst legal tests I can imagine (and it's used all the time). I'm too creative to be allowed to play with a loose standard like that. The potential for abuse and selective enforcement is enormous.

110 scotsilv  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:05:16am

To: philip.kurian@duke.edu

Dear Mr. Kurian,

In response to your article "The Jews", here is a slightly edited version called "the Blacks."

"The Blacks"

Judaism is a “gutter religion." Exploit them 'crackers for all they got.

-- Rev. Farrakhan

Such describes the Black concept of the world: a credo that, to many blacks, prescribes what role they should play in the wider concerns of our society. Judging by the opposition to this past weekend’s Slave Reparations conference, however, I cannot help but conclude that the powerful Black establishment has distorted the meaning of this age-old teaching.

It is well known that Blacks constitute the most privileged "welfare recipient" group in this country. Among the top 10 welfare states, Blacks enjoy shocking overrepresentation: Only California has an Black welfare recipient population below 10 percent, and four states have particularly stark Black advantages—Mississippi (30 percent), Arkansas (23 percent), Missouri (31 percent) and Michigan (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Black.

In his slim volume The Blackness Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Black Suffering (2000), black race bating demagogue Rev. Jesse Jackson argues that American interest in Blackness is “a tribute not to Blacksuffering but to Black aggrandizement.” The slavery label, he says, arose from the real suffering of blacks during the 1700's and 1800's, in turn giving rise to the Black Welfare ideology, distinguished in its capitalization. He documents economic exploitation by this “Black Welfare Industry,” which he calls an “outright extortion racket.”

Mr. Kurian,

I'm sure you won't find this too offensive.

Best Regards.

111 XanaX  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:05:23am

Everyone knows the Jews control the media, the money supply, the US government, and now, it becomes clear, academia.

/?!?!?

The scary thing about articles like this is that I get the impression they're just sticking a toe in the water, in order to get an idea of how much anti-Semitism is possible to serve up while still appearing "progressive"---whatever that's come to mean...

112 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:06:02am

ploome

I'm not Jewish, ploome, but I hope my view hasn't been distirted by that fact .

113 transient  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:07:58am

OT:
Representatives of Presbyterian Church meet with Hezbollah.

The 24-member delegation traveled to Lebanon on Sunday and met with the south Lebanon commander of Hezbollah, a group Washington calls terrorist but Lebanon sees as a legitimate resistance movement against Israeli occupation of Arab lands.

On Monday, they traveled to Syria, where they met with the minister of expatriates. They were scheduled to meet with President Bashar Assad on Tuesday and to travel to Jordan on Wednesday.

So now the Church has taken to meeting up with terrorists. Hezbollah of course is responsible for the murder of Americans as well as Israelis. What's next, sending round the collection plate for Al-Qaeda?

Wonder if they're going to address any issues like Hezbollah's firing on Israeli civilian settlements, or would that be too 'even handed'? Once again, killing Jews is okay, as long as it's for a 'good cause,' but Israeli self-defense is unconscionable.

It is another characteristic trait of antisemitism that Jews must accept an inferior position, and be grateful for what they get. Jews, as inferior, must trust Christians to defend them (or not, depending on whim). The fact that Israel insists on defending itself is intolerable to the Jew-haters.

114 alegrias  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:08:05am

FYI, in the pulling out all the pre-emptive stops department:

Trial lawyers are getting letters from the Association of Trial Lawyers of America asking for money to help those "civil justice champions" Kedwards defeat tort "reform" President Bush.

Imagine the horror, "...we could be facing the most dire threat in our history"...Next January we could once again be confronted with tort "reformers" in control of the White House and both Houses of Congress." "Trial Lawyers Attacked" --an insert with scare quotes from Bill Frist, Dick Cheney & Pres. Bush concerning doctors leaving medicine--the world is coming to an end!

Mary E. Alexander, Chair of ATLA PAC at [Link: www.atlapac@atlahq.org...]

115 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:08:17am

110

Ouch.

116 freedomsound  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:08:28am

Meanwhile...U.S. Presbyterian Church delegation was just in Lebanon meeting with Hizballah…to coordinate strategies to defeat the Jewish enemy I suppose.

117 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:09:23am

95 TS


In the editorial Philip Kurian also says that he wouldn't oppose a KKK conference at Duke

Did you read this comment:


Mr. Kurian,
Had I written such a piece last year, called the BLACKS, where I tell you that all you have to do is act white and you will be accepted, and that you are over dramatizing your plight as a people because slavery ended more than 100 years ago, I would have been branded a racist and probably protested against by several cultural groups. What you wrote today was an injustice to not only to the Jews, but to all minorities. I am embarased to have been a writer for the chronicle after reading this. Just because you use some textual evidence doesn't mean you are justified in what you wrote. You are an embarasment. At least I know my grandparents went through Concentration Camps. I heard their stories. I doubt now is yet the time to start belittling the Holocaust.

From the Chronicle:
Pipes calls for end to Palestinian aid
And from the very first paragraph:

Pro-Israeli activist Daniel Pipes advocated ending the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by cutting off worldwide support to the Palestinian cause in a Thursday night speech sponsored by the Duke Conservative Union.
118 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:09:33am

#21 TalkinKamel

I wonder "did WWII ever end?"

119 Poitiers-Lepanto  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:09:46am

I am not Jewish and I feel offended by this dirty column.
If the writer is an African American I am even more astonished and offended.

We are sinking deep into the abyss.

Nazi-fascism allied with redfascism and with islamofascism...

120 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:10:27am

Slim

WOW...you can tell race/ethenicity by writing!

but what about truth, objectivity, reasoned argument?

The article has no value and no point and the remarkably stupid asumptions the writer makes shouldn't be excused no-matter his race...

121 zulubaby  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:11:28am
You could substitute "Asian" for "Jewish" in Kurian's screed, complete with all the same Ivy league overrepresentation statistics, and publish the same damn letter next week (less the Holocaust references).

Wow, that's quite a stretch. It isn't about Asians, it's about "The Jew", complete with Holocaust references. What is your point?

122 Anant  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:11:37am

Actually, I think that these days in America it's actually Hindus, not Jews, who are the most "successful" minority. So does this mean I am part of some massive conspiracy? Am I secretly controlling the government and the media? Are Bush, Cheney, the 9 Supremes, the Senate, the House, etc, all Hindus in disguise?

This guy is a freakin' idiot.

As far as I can tell (not being Jewish myself), the Jews have EARNED every last scrap of the money, power, respect, etc they enjoy in this country. How many hospitals, museums, schools, etc have Jewish benefactors? Where I live (the Boston area) practically every single hospital is B'nai this or Israel that, or there's some building with "*Stein" on it.

The Jews have earned their place in America through the most noble way possible - through service - and for that they should be honored.

123 MJ  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:11:49am

Here's what Abe Foxman of the ADL wrote about this antisemitic piece of trash :


Letters to the Editor
The Duke Chronicle October 18, 2004


To the Editor:

Philip Kurian's offensive article contains a number of classic stereotypes about Jews including charges of excessive wealth, power and a lack of concern for anyone but themselves ("The Jews," Oct. 18). Indeed, if one were to follow the logic of his diatribe against the Jewish community, Jews would not be entitled to all the rights and opportunities available to other Americans because they are rich and powerful.

In fact, Jews, like others, have basic rights. They have the right to express themselves when faced with a hate-filled initiative such as the Palestine Solidarity Movement program brought to Duke. They have the right to fulfill themselves in society without having to endure accusations of privilege and of "shocking overrepresentation." They have the right and obligation to stand up when the State of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, is delegitimized.

None of this makes us anti-Palestinian. To the contrary, we believe that Palestinians should have a state side-by-side the Jewish state. We are aware, however, that the main reason a Palestinian state does not exist is that for too long, Palestinian leaders have the same hateful and destructive attitudes that Duke saw coming out of the PSM conference.

Kurian adds one more absurd accusation that demonstrates his bias: the charge that Jews in America are seeking to belittle and undermine the civil rights movement. Aside from the historic leadership role that American Jews played in the movement for civil rights, we, unlike Kurian do not see these issues as a zero-sum game where working on behalf of our own community means working against someone else. We believe that standing up for Jews and against anti-Semitism and standing up for other minorities is not only not contradictory but is, in fact, the essential ingredient for building a just society.

After the difficulties of this past weekend, one would have hoped that The Chronicle would have been more interested in printing an article to heal the wounds rather than one to further inflame the situation.


Sincerely,

Abraham H. Foxman
National Director




ADL Resources
Media Watch
ADL monitors electronic and print media reports about the Middle East
Related Material

Print This Page

E-Mail This to A Friend

124 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:12:19am

113

Maybe they could also address the fact that Palestinians destroy artifacts in the Temple daily. And that Palestinians piss on the Wailing Wall.

Or the fact that Arabs do not hold in regard anything Judeo Christian and that it might be better handled by Israel.

125 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:12:34am

#98 Zach

bravo well said

Thanks.

Socialism abhors those who work hard and profit from it.

These assholes think if you've managed to make something of yourself then it must have been some sort of fluke or conspiracy or anything except taking risks and putting in the hours.

I've only realized the truth of this just recently.

I was talking to this Chompskyite at a bar, and he seriously opined that "the rich" were, generally, evil.

It's hard to believe that people can really be this stupid. Or morally retarded, or whatever it is.

It was funny, because he said this in front of my (quite liberal) friend [okay, I like to think of myself as liberal too - I've just become a full-on liberal WARHAWK], who's working his ass off as his own boss in his internet start up company, for the express purpose of striking it rich - which may well happen someday; and then he'd instantly become evil.

I hope this helps my friend realize what kind of whackjobs he's allying himself with (my friend is, for all intents and purposes, in with the Bush=Hitler crowd).

126 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:13:05am

#111 XanaX

I agree. I think they are testing the water, so to speak, seeing how far they can go, and how much they can get away with. If they get a rap on the nose, they'll retreat---a little bit---whining that they're not Antisemetic! They're just worried about bad old Israel, and the Jewish community!

If they don't get rapped on the nose---well, I'm afraid it's going to be Germany, circa 1939; "Dejas Vous, all over again!"

As for "Progressive"---as far as I'm concerned, the term means nothing anymore. A lot of so-called progressive thinking these days doesn't seem much different from bad old Facist thinking. The Left is now in bed with radical Islam, and that's about as unprogressive as you can get! (See my post #106, to applesweet.)

127 ShanNYC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:13:22am

I'm just curious as to why some here seem to assume Mr. Kurian is black.

Further curious as to why that fact has any bearing on the discussion: does his assumed blackness make his drivel any more or less offensive?

128 Atlas Wannabe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:14:47am

105 Slim:

Generally, names ending in -ian are Armenian (although this is a pretty short one). In any case, I don't think assuming he's a black guy is a safe bet.

And as far as groups that offend the left wing - don't be ignorant, that letter got published because it is in synch with left wing sentiment.

This just reinforces my already objectivist leaning beliefs. The first step on the road to self destruction of a society is to reward poor performace.

Affirmative Action can not create benefit to a society.

Long live Booker T. Washington!

129 Belize042  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:14:58am

I feel I can write the next few days' news articles about this column and its reaction.

1. Protests, letters, emails, and phone calls inundate Duke and the newspaper.

2. Duke and/or newspaper issue statement "apologizing for any offense caused," as if there's a teensy possibility someone may be offended by such blatant Jew-hatred, you know, thin-skinned people, I guess.

3. Kurian denounces "censorship" and demands his rights to free speech be respected. The ACLU will probably feel compelled to make one of its asinine pronouncements.

4. Demonstrators at Duke decry the "muzzling" of Kurian.

5. Quietly, everything goes back to the way it was. Welcome back to the editorial page, Mr. Kurian. Gonna write about them Jews again? Good boy!

It's not actually funny, because it's likely what will happen.

130 nimslight  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:15:53am

Poll: Bush Doubles Support Among Blacks

they see the light


[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

131 American Infidel[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:15:53am
132 Buck  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:16:17am

I am not shocked that the opposition to the PSM conference would be misunderstood. Mr. Kurian underestimates how much money it really cost to get a university like Duke to host such an event. In fact it takes years of 'funding' student groups, and student activists. Without that history, the PSM would have been sent to book the local hall in town.

Hamas, the PA, and the other terror groups that were represented are to many the same organization as al-qaeda. Would we allow OBL to hold a similar conference? With restrictions perhaps.

I too am an advocate of free speech; however there is a line that we cannot allow anyone to cross. Hate messages, the call for genocide, slander, or un-truths designed for the purpose of hate must be controlled.
There is a difference between allowing free speech, and hosting it.

Even Mr. Kurian would set limits to the free speech he would 'probably' let the Ku Klux Klan have.

Yet he does not seem to advocate placing the same need for "serious discussion" on the PSM.

Finally, the 92,000 signatures were not bought, or forged. They represent a group of people using the privilege their signature represents wisely.

I respect that signature as a vote, or chance to stand up and be counted. Mr. Kurian discounts that. Those 92,000 people have no standing, have no real voice.

I suspect he is going to learn otherwise. Their voice will be heard, and he will accept what they say in the same way he would 'probably' accept the voice of the KKK.

133 kelly  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:16:58am

#116 freedomsound

the jerk doing most of the talking is from Ann Arbor, Michigan. That town besides having a university has an extremly large arab population.

Its very possible that he is trying to keep his neigbors happy and hopes that they will not do anything to his church.

Since Hezbollah is a listed terrorist list he should be charged with treason for consorting with the enemy. Anyone based in this town want to report this infraction to the FBI and the local newspapers demanding an investigation with proper followup??

134 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:17:35am

116 freedomsound
If it is not bad enough the Presbyterian Church is divesting from Israel, now they meet with the enemy. Talk about sick! If this is not an example of a world turned upside down, nothing is.

But there is more...always more:
Anglican leaders following Presbyterian lead

135 Charles  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:19:09am

It's not an assumption: Kurian is black.

136 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:19:19am

It is a pretty wicked assumption the Mr. Kurian is black. I interpreted that the reference to African Americans in his article was merely a vehicle to drive a point through.

For all those here who found that article offensive, it was equally offensive to lash out at Mr. Kurian's percieved ethnicity.

At least level the playing field here people by not sinking to Mr. Kurians level when presenting your rebuttal to his opinions about Jews.

137 forever banned  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:19:40am

#110 scotsilv,

laughing/crying out loud!

138 Smit  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:22:33am

#131 American Infidel - Those responses are great. Especially the one that proves to us Brits, once and for all, that Americans do in fact 'get' sarcasm.

My favourite:

Please keep in mind that I am something of an anglophile, so this is not confrontational. Please remember, too, that I am merely an American. That means I am not very bright. It means I have no culture or sense of history. It also means that I am barely literate, so please don't use big, fancy words.

Set me straight, folks!

Sounds positively lizaroid to me!

139 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:23:08am

#125 Lewis

I used to think of myself as a liberal. I would have thought that standing up against terrorists and dictators [eg. Bashir Assad, Ali (the jews did it) Komeine, Yasser (g-d father of terrorism) Arafat, etc..], the liberal thing to do.

It seems that the conservatives are the ones standing up for human rights and the liberals are standing up for the right of dictators to build mass graves and stone woman to death.

140 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:24:57am

135

I stand corrected, but my point remains firm. It is not in very good tact to attack his ethnicity in response. For the very same reason he has attacked the jewish population with a sweeping generalization and stereotyping, it is not necessarily very intelligent to stoop to his level in teaching him a lesson.

141 JT - Last of the Moheebans  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:25:19am

#136

oops- he is black. And the point of most of the posts that reference that fact isn't to harp on his race, but to show how racist his own article was.

Zulubaby was right that you can't take the holocaust references out of his diatribe and apply the rest of his article to other minorities.

The references to other minorities in this thread merely show how endemic antisemetism has become by pointing out how clearly racist the article would have been had it been about any other group.

142 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:25:33am

123 MJ
Anytime Foxman writes anything the other side yells foul. You see with great proof that today people can be as Anti-Semitic as they please and when they are accused of it they claim Jews are paranoid for mere criticism is not Anti-Semitism.

Lack of truth mixed with hate and denial makes one hell of a really stiff drink.

143 Composmentis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:25:38am

Free speech must remain just that. There have to be some constraints, and common sense dictates most.

The most disturbing thing about the meeting at Duke is
the banning of recording devices. Where was Duke
when this freedom was restrained? Would the freedom of the press to print a transcript hurt their "cause".

144 Smit  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:25:44am

From Charles' link -

Fascinated by science, inspired by innovative solutions to social problems, and entranced by great literature, life stories, and any heated discussion, I have a set of interests as varied as my experiences.

What a pretentious wally.

145 American Infidel[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:25:49am
146 cantrecant  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:27:32am

Philip Kurian sounds like the usual envious power seeking loser looking for a conspiracy to blame for his loserdom. Such people are in the power of the devil and refuse to believe that doing right is the path to success. They view success as the result of evil scheming and seek to out scheme everyone else.

147 transient  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:27:33am

#109 beagle;

Thanks for that. Looking at their code, (and I followed a few useless links to the 'policies' page) Kurian's article would not qualify as harassment and more likely would be protected. There is no clear proviso against hate speech as such.

One might ask the Duke administration specifically if they in fact show favoritism towards Jews, or if they believe other Ivy League (or Ivy League standard) universities do. If Duke does not, the administration should publically refute the charges in Kurian's article. Otherwise, they confirm they are part of the problem.

It's quite ironic, really, because until the second half of the 20th century, Jews (with perhaps extremely rare exceptions) were not even admitted to Ivy League schools.

148 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:28:35am
149 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:29:22am

Thank you Charles for bailing me out...Kurian is black. I had intuited that from the sensibility of the article and from the nature of his other publishings. I was on somewhat thin ice I suppose, but turned out to hold up anyway.

So anyway, back to my main point which was:

The "model minorities" are an embarrasing and perplexing dilemna for proponents of affirmative active who for the less successfully assimilated minority groups.

I don't know if that makes Kurian's opinion any less threatening sounding to a Jew (no, I'm not a Jew, we established that earlier) but I think it does shade his perspective.

150 left jab, right cross  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:30:15am

I hereby nominate Philip Kurian for the:

"Jason Blair outstanding achievement award in fictitious journalism"

What a Loser.

151 reason  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:33:04am

141

The point of it is well understood, but one has to wonder about the taste of the delivery. I am sure Mr. Kurian will read that and have plenty of ammunation for a rabble rousing group like the ACLU to pounce and put spin on. Further diminishing your point ot him.

I am sure that Mr. Kurian will not see the bitter sarcasm in the text, but WILL understand that someone who is "white" has obviously attacked his race.

Is that the response desired? Do we here at LGF seek to be painted as racists? Or could we have simply pointed out to Mr. Kurian that his viewpoints about the jewish population are "in fact" anti semitic and racist, and that Mr. Kurian is simply a racists hatemonger regardless of his race.

152 Just right of middle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:33:09am

#127 ShanNYC

I did a google search on his name and found him at [Link: www.bnduke.org...]

Since there was a clear picture of him there, I don't think I was really assuming his racial background.

Of course, I would prefer to get rid of the hyphenations and just call all of us American. However, I don't think that the hyphenated Americans are willing to give up their anger.

153 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:33:11am

OT - that darn "Iraqi" resistance

October 19, 2004
IRAQI BORDER POLICE ARRESTED 142 INFILTRATORS COMING FROM IRAN LAST WEEK. THE INFILTRATORS WERE OF DIVERSE NATIONALITIES, INCLUDING AFGHANIS, IRANIANS, AND PAKISTANIS, AND CARRIED WEAPONS AND DRUGS, BUT NO DOCUMENTS. (AL-ZAMAN, BAGHDAD, 10/19/04)

154 BXEKLT  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:33:30am

This is off the topic - but the world today is a better place because I saw that Rick Sanchez is on CNN.

155 kelly  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:33:52am

Getting Stoned: Islamic Style

Almost two months after having hanged a 16 years-old girl, the ruling Iranian ayatollahs are to commit another human crime by condemning another young girl to stoning.

According to Iranian and foreign press, Zhila Izadi, a 13 years old girl from the north-western city of Marivan had been condemned to death by stoning after being found that she had been pregnant from her 15 years-old brother.

The independent Iranian online newspaper “Peyke Iran” (www.peykeiran.com) that had first revealed the news last week reported on Saturday 16 October 2004 that the girl has given birth two weeks ago in prison.

While Zhila as been sentenced to stoning, her brother, jailed in Tehran, is to receive only 150 lashes, in accordance with Islamic laws.
lawyer

156 XanaX  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:34:06am

Cut the guy a break...He's probably just blowing off a little steam, you know, to get back at his Jewish classmates who, by out-performing him in school, inadvertently expose him for the intellectual midget he really is.

/not

157 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:34:11am

I would say Mr. Kurian is just a racist hatemonger.

158 ShanNYC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:34:51am

It wouldn't matter to me if Mr. Kurian were white, black, brown or martian...his writing is drivel, the same old tired accusations of the "Holocaust Industry" and Jewish victimization recycled from about five minutes after Auschwitz was shut for good. It would be mildly offensive if it were original.

I used to write for the campus daily, and it seemed to me an article like this would get play once a semester (I remember one railing against the Israeli practice to kill puppies in Gaza, since the Palestinians were strapping bombs to the dogs' back: the writer seemed to feel dogs in Gaza had more of a right to live than Jews in Tel Aviv).

In any event, no need to look for explanations from Mr. Kurian's color: idiots like that transcend race.

159 coach  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:36:24am

As they say so often and well at FARK:

"Duke Sucks!"

160 a girl called Alex  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:37:17am

OT: Another kidnapping

This time they take the head of CARE, which, it is reported, supplies water for 21 million Iraqis.

161 Right Wing Nutt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:37:52am

anyone listening to O'Reily, just read supposedly he said bush is up 49-41 in new fox poll

162 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:38:37am
163 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:39:32am

#160

You don't think they'll really "take her head," do you?

164 2met  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:40:28am

Please, please, please, please, please...

Make sure everyone knows the difference between Norman G. Finkelstein and Norman H. Finkelstein.

Norman G. Finkelstein is one quoted in the Duke article. He is the controvercial author of The Holocaust Industry and Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, New and Revised Edition.

Norman H. Finkelstein is a school librarian in the Brookline Massachusetts Public Schools and an instructor at Hebrew College. He writes books for young readers, including Remember Not to Forget: A Memory of the Holocaust and Heeding the Call: Jewish Voices in America's Civil Rights Struggle. He is the recipient of the Golden Kite Honor Book Award and two National Jewish Book Awards.

These are two very different people. Norman H. Finkelstein was a teacher of mine, a man of great integrity and love for his Jewish heritage, and a supportive member of the Jewish community.

165 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:41:04am

#88

"Pirke Avot" does not mean "Book of Principles".

Actually, the name of the tractate is simply avot, which means 'Fathers.' It is often prefaced with the word 'Pirke', which means "chapters of".

But calling it "Principles" may be the only correct thing Kurian did -- albeit by accident. In the Mishneh (the part of the talmud that includes Avot'), the term Av (singular of Avot) is often used to mean basic category or basic principle. Thus the 39 categories of malacha (activities -- often mistranslated as 'work' or 'labor') that are prohibited on the Sabbath are referred to in the Talmud as the 39 Av malachot (primary forms of malacha).

Pirke Avot has nothing to do with the Fathers (Avraham, Yitzhak and Yaakov) and everything to do with fundamental principles of ethics. Hence Principles is really a more accurate translation than the more common term "Fathers." And the term "ethics" (a Greek concept, with no precise analogue in Hebrew, which instead uses such terms as justice, or the right thing, or the law, or the teaching) nowhere appears in the title Pirke Avot.

166 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:42:25am

If Jews have done something (whatever that may be) with the Holocaust, what should we call what Muslims have done with the Crusades into Jerusalem circa 1099-forward? I don't think there are any living victims of the Crusades. Those were medieval (read: violent) times anyway. Nobody followed modern conceptions of human rights because they did not exist. The Crusades are frequently cited by Muslims as a violation of their rights (I guess to conquer and not ever lose).

Academia is filled with dark mentions of the Crusades, as if that justifies Muslim atrocities today. Actual living Jews, and millions of dead Jews, suffered the Holocaust. But in the span of 60 years, with anti-Semitism increasing all over the world, the author finds it important to note that the Holocaust has received attention in the media and elsewhere.

I should be used to the double standard by now.

167 Jollyman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:44:15am

While a lot of people are saying that Mr. Kurian is of Armenian descent, I have to disagree. "Kurian" is a fairly common name in the state of Kerala in India. The state is quite famous for having elected Communists consistently to the state legislature. As for his moonbattery, he partly belongs to the same ethnic group as another barking lunatic, Arundhati Roy. So that should explain it somewhat. OTOH, Kerala has a long standing Jewish community with amicable relations with the surrounding Hindu society. So his attitude could be native to the US.

He considers himself black - so either he is basing it on his skin color or he has one black parent/grandparent. He is only partly ethnically black - if at all.

168 SlimyBill  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:46:46am

His ethnicity might not be black but his heart sure is.

169 transient  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:46:55am

#105 slim

I just read this whole thread and I think there's some hyper-ventilating going on... No reason to panic yet.

When would you be ready to speak out?

"First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Catholics, but I was not a Catholic so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out."
---Rev. Martin Niemoller.

The take-away lesson is to speak out now. Before we have to panic. Before we have to leave the country.

[I am assuming this is why ploome asked you about your ethnicity. Jews learned this lesson in the 1940s. The rest of the West did not.]

170 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:47:21am

Duke seems to be making an extra special effort lately to promote antisemitism and cozy up to terrorists. Lovely.

In some ways Norman Finkelstein is worse than Chompsky because both his parents were survivors, it's as though that gives him special self-hating Jew privileges that can be justified because of his parent's trip through Nazi hell.

171 editor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:48:47am

I haven't read all the posts, but the quotation from Pirkei Avot refers to Torah, not to Perfection of the World.

172 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:49:33am

#135 Charles
From his bio:

Growing up black in Charleston, South Carolina, my identity has been largely shaped by race


Yes, this is the new America. No wonder he thinks in terms of "The Jews". The civil rights movement empowered black people all over the United States to become raging bigots.

173 Fondu  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:51:40am
174 transient  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:52:10am

#166 beagle;

(paraphrasing): "A violation of [Muslim] rights (I guess to conquer and not ever lose)."

Yeah, that seems to be their attitude to Israel. They have a right to attack, but if they don't win, damn, call the UN quick!

175 cantrecant  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:53:50am

#146 cantrecant

Such people are in the power of the devil

From the lower left of the page Charles posted (Philip Kurian) I see that the university itself has that cute old sucker as their team mascot.

176 kid charlemagne  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:54:14am

Perhaps the most important reason why Jews are so over-represented at top universities: They're fucking smart!

The average I.Q. for Ashkenazi Jews is approximately 115, one standard deviation above the mean of 100.

177 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:54:17am

#135 Charles

Holy cow:

My name is Philip Kurian, but most of my friends call me Phil. I am a student at Duke University, where I have the distinct privilege of being a Benjamin N. Duke Scholar. Besides paying for tuition (which is no slight matter), the BN Duke Leadership program is empowering me to pursue my passions and goals in life, always challenging me to take the hard road to defining personal success.

Heh. Turns out he DOES know what privilege means.

And this privilege has EMPOWERED him!!!111!

Growing up black in Charleston, South Carolina, my identity has been largely shaped by race, and coming to Duke was yet another challenge in my development.

Ah, another notch in the belt for the leftist PC multiculti non-integrationist folks, always working to highlight our differences, and make sure that NO ONE ever forgets their racial identity. Victimhood in perpetuity!!!

178 ShanNYC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:54:21am

Beagle, # 172
"The civil rights movement empowered black people all over the United States to become raging bigots."

Yes, dammit, so much better when those blackies knew their place. Honestly, when did these black folks get so uppity?

/do I really need the tag?

179 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:54:31am

I was reading a web site by a geneticist the other day and there was some blurb about the link between high IQ and a genetic disease among Ashkenazi Jews - there was some disease that as a side effect seems to increase the connections per brain cell, which also seems to increase the intelligence of it's suffers.

I thought that was interesting because Albert Einstein's brain was preserved and (recently) studied, and I also read that the number of connections per neuron was higher than is considered normal.

If Albert was the world's greatest physicist, perhaps Richard Feynman was the second, also a Jew.

Anyway I did a search to find a table of IQ by country and similar things.

Ashkenazi Jews are the ethnic group with the highest median IQ, and perhaps, the article I read above suggests that there are genes in that population which sometimes encourage genius, explaining why Jews are "over represented" at universities.

By the way, the country with the highest median IQ is Japan, whose children score MUCH higher than the children of other countries (suggesting a better education and environment), but whose adults only score moderately better.

180 Michoel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:55:57am

#165 Yankev,
You got a makor for all that? Avot means Avot. As in the Chachamim who express themselves in these perakim.

181 AG in Houston  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:56:32am

Makes me wonder if the astute racist Kurian realized that the Rabbi of my Temple marched with Martin Luther King.

Probably not.

I would like nothing more than 5 minutes with Kurian in a room.

I will show him how uppity a Jew can get.

182 Quimmelton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:57:51am

#32 N.A. Palm

To be totally fair, Soros survived the Nazis and the Communists. He's from Hungary and left there in 1947.

183 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:59:07am

Thank you Yasser Arafat for this:An Israeli civilian was shot and killed by Palestinian sniper fire near Mevo Dotan in north Samaria on Tuesday afternoon.

Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades, a group associated with Palestinian Authority chairman Yasser Arafat's Fatah, in a statement issued soon after the attack, claimed responsibility for the attack which it said was to avenge the death of Zakhariya Zbeidi's deputy Sheikh Mahmud Abu Khalifa in an IAF strike two months ago.

Next four years we must push to make Al Aksa and the PA deemed a terrorist organization. It is the only right thing to do. And while we are all pushing we must also insure that Arafat is tried for war crimes.

184 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:00:18am

#178 ShanNYC

You are just too stupid to understand anything aren't you?

What, do you think black people are incapable of becoming bigots? Look up, jackass.

Quit projecting your racist views on me. I'm sick of your leftist attitudes which dehumanize people of other races, making them incapable of choosing to believe things out of free will.

185 Opinionated Vogon  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:00:39am

Yesterday while blogging I stumbled across this interview of Brigitte Gabriel. She is a christian from Lebanon and this is her story. (sorry if this has been posted in other threads) Its about 45 minutes long but well worth the time imo.

Brigitte Gabriel interview.

186 sunny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:00:55am

new fox news poll shows bush up 7 points. No link yet it was just on TV

187 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:01:36am

And this in from MEMRI TV:

Lebanese Progressive Intellectual: 'The Calamities of Contemporary Arab Culture are Largely Due to the Egyptian Media and Intellectual Community'

Another quest in the next four years would be to cut off the money to Egypt!

188 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:02:36am
189 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:04:40am
demon of antisemetism---and this time, not from right wing facists, but from those loving, tolerant, oh-so-broadminded denizens of the liberal, progressive left? (I guess I just answered my own question; for the MSM, "Right Wing antisemetism bad, Left Wing antisemetism good".)


Someone else probably made this point already, but it can't be made enough: There never were "right wing fascists", at least not in the sense the "left" or "liberals" want you to believe. Fascists and national socialists were socialists! Their ideas had a lot in common with the ideas on the current "left" and nothing in common with freedom loving conservatism or libertarianism. There is no surprise anti-semitism is showing up on the "left". The "left" is showing its true colors again. (BTW, a lot of post-WWII American "neo-nazis" were just clueless punks and loners using nazi symbols for shock value. If you go back to the source and read the arguments of real fascists and nazis in the 1920s-40s, they sound a lot like the LLL. For example, a book like Kennedy's Against Nature would fit right in with the treehugging Heidegger type nazis. Don't forget old Joe was a nazi sympathizer. Coming full circle.)

190 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:06:16am
191 ChuckC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:07:50am

OT

I just read a disturbing entry at JihadWatch.org suggesting Bush would accept Sharia law in Iraq if the Iraqis were to vote for it. This quote supposedly originated from AP, but I can't find another source.

192 Darwin Akbar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:08:21am

#74 - scotsilv:

I am old enought to have actually seen the Plasmatics perform in 1979 or 1980. They really sucked. The highlight of the show was watching Wendy Williams tounging the barrel of a prop shotgun. Musically, they were the worst I've ever heard (and I've been attending rock shows since 1973).

As for this person, it only shows what we on this site have known for the last 3 years - Jewbaiting is the only acceptable form of racist expression allowed today. Everything else is "prohibited hate speech." Moreover, in his typical leftist mindset, only the ideas he approves of are worth protecting as "free speech."

It is truly sickening.

193 loppyd  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:09:38am

I am not Jewish, but I found this article to be insulting and sickening nonetheles. Any decent, clear-thinking person who reads Kurian's hateful words will feel the shock and disgust that I felt. Shame on him and shame on Duke. Now I'm glad I got the thin envelope from them back in '88.

194 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:10:54am

#139 Jonny 10/19/2004 10:23AM PST

It seems that the conservatives are the ones standing up for human rights and the liberals are standing up for the right of dictators to build mass graves and stone woman to death.

Yes, I noticed this about a year ago (that probably makes me a little slow). Paleoconservative isolationist foreign policy is the new liberal, progressive foreign policy.

My brain hurts when I think about this too much.

195 Quimmelton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:14:04am

#191- ChuckC

That's f-ed up. I read something about that as well. Maybe they're trying to sneak it in, so there isn't any big notice.

196 a girl called Alex  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:14:20am
197 just right of middle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:15:17am

175 cantrecant

Dang, can't a brother get his props around here? I put that link in on post 56.

Man, this is just like television news...the lowly cub reporter does the research, and the famous person gets the credit for breaking the story.

198 freedomsound  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:15:40am

#181 AG in Houston

Makes me wonder if the astute racist Kurian realized that the Rabbi of my Temple marched with Martin Luther King.

Also note that of the 14 original founders of the NAACP, 13 were Jewish.

Sadly, Kurian and his ilk would likely see that as a Jewish conspiracy to control Blacks.

199 Rantworst  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:16:03am

To a leftie, success is always a conspiracy. Whenever a Republican wins a close election, they start with conspiracy theories.

Vowels in The Mouth

200 IrishBrewer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:17:58am

What a lame story.

Should all colleges be artificially stocked to contain the same percentages of students as found in the populus? Could it be that in some ethnic cultures, education is seen as more important than in others? That being the case, some minoities have a distinct advantage in gaining admission to competitive colleges. If Kurian can show that prospective students are being given preferential treatment due to their ethnicity, fine - prove it but to just state that the colleges are being unfair just because of the percentages of a given minority group seems askew is a bunch of bs.

What is his solution? Randomly choose who gets into Yale and give everyone an "A"?

201 RC neo-Jew  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:18:09am

Union of Jewish Students stall messed up at European Social Forum,

UJS activists set up the display on Friday to provide the only mainstream Jewish presence at the Alexandra Palace human rights event...

But only the human rights of 'palestinians' matter to some people - they don't recognise the human rights of Jews.

The table was littered with rubbish, as well as leaflets from pro-Palestinian groups and a pamphlet on Islam produced by the Muslim Association of Britain.

The organisers of the Social Forum, which had plenty of pro-palestinian events, couldn't see anything wrong with it, but the police could see what it was...

Police are now treating the incident as a racially motivated crime
202 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:18:42am
I just read a disturbing entry at JihadWatch.org suggesting Bush would accept Sharia law in Iraq if the Iraqis were to vote for it.

You either believe in democracy or you don't. Bush can't go around second guessing the choices of the Iraqi people. Another clear line he lays out. I think part of his gamble is sharia (cough, spit) is not going to happen in Iraq. If it does it's the Iraqi's problem. If it does and leads to confrontation with the west, that creates a new situation that can be dealt with.

203 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:19:18am

Rayra 190

Come onnn Rayra!

He's a black kid who's going through his intellectual formation period, and who's ranting a pretty common rant about "Why-is -that-minority-doing-so-much-better-than-my-minori ty-even-though-they-didn't-have-affirmative-action .?"

I hardly think that makes him Judenhass, or makes him require a "spanking." My goodness, who's for and against thought control here?

204 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:19:48am

Beagle (#172):

The civil rights movement empowered black people all over the United States to become raging bigots.

The Jew-hatred coming from the black people is suprising at first glance (no good deed goes unpunished), but actually is easily explainable. It's just hating the whitey taken to most logical and convenient end.

Jews are a perfect target for that hatred since they are both the most conspicously successful group of whiteys, and the most vulnerable (the other whiteys having no great love for them either, and are all to happy to deflect the black resentment in such a way).

205 IrishBrewer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:22:08am

#202

OT - Funny about Harry Potter. My wife and 7 yr old daughter are also hooked. They've both read all the books (some more than once) and eagerly await the next. There are Catholics on both sides of the HP debate as well.

206 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:23:31am

#178 ShanNYC

Answer the questions posed to you in earlier threads, or shut the hell up.

207 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:24:03am
I hardly think that ... makes him require a "spanking."

You're right. A baseball bat is much more appropriate here.

208 ConIL  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:26:14am

#202 Bush would support Islamic Law.

You are refering to:

[Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

209 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:26:39am
210 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:27:04am

OT **apostate watch**

Uh oh, CAIR's not going to like this:

Female basketball player leaves USF, returns to Christianity

TAMPA, Fla. - A 22-year-old woman who created an uproar when she wanted to wear Islamic garb while playing basketball for University of South Florida has left the school and returned to Christianity.

Andrea Armstrong, who is from Lakeside, Ore., said in an Oct. 6 e-mail to the Oregonian newspaper in Portland that her conversion was a misstep caused by loneliness and estrangement from her home support system.

"It was my loneliness and forgetfulness of my past teachings that caused me to convert to Islam," she wrote. "I know that my actions caused great controversy over the past few weeks. I had no idea that a decision that I thought I was making for myself would reach out so far beyond myself and affect so many."

Armstrong's story drew international headlines when she announced she left the team and lost her scholarship after coach Jose Fernandez told her she could not wear the religiously mandated long pants, top with long sleeves and scarf during practices or games.

Armstrong then met with Fernandez, university officials and a representative of Council on American-Islamic Relations, and officials agreed that the team would accommodate her Islamic attire and reinstate her scholarship. The university also agreed to ask the NCAA for an exemption to its uniform policy to allow her to wear a scarf.

211 militarybrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:29:58am

Irish Brewer:

I haven't noticed any Catholics who are anti-Harry. We taught it at my school, and we're Catholics ourselves. Even the Vatican came out and said the book was a good one and not demonically inspired Satan-in-disguise.

212 Just Right of Middle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:30:03am

206 Sarah D.

While I enjoy intellectual discussions with people of differing opinions, it has occured to me that ShanNYC is just trolling and baiting. After all, he was saying we were assuming the race of Mr. Kurian after I had already posted a link that would have addressed his concern.

In the end, I suggest that you follow the popular internet adage, "Don't feed the trolls." Ignore him so he will lose interest and find another sandbox in which he may play.

213 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:30:03am
214 JohnAnnArbor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:31:41am

OK, I just read this article:
[Link: www.newsday.com...]

The Presbyterians meeting Hezbollah.

The leader of their "delegation" is from ANN ARBOR.

I'm nominally Presbyterian, but stuff like this is driving me nuts. I'd like to give this dude a piece of my mind...

215 American Infidel[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:32:26am
216 Pooh  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:32:57am

The anti-Semite only ever sees control or privilege, he never sees contribution.

And simply because Jews are doing well in a society does not mean they are inured against the terrors of Jew-hatred. Many Jews in pre-war Germany, Austria, Hungary, Holland, Poland and Czechoslovakia had also been very successful; it didn't prevent the great majority of Jews in those countries being murdered a few short years later.

In any event, only a complete lunatic or a person who is grossly anti-Semitic would cite the repellent Norman Finkelstein as an authority on Jewish issues.

217 Rantworst  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:33:22am

"I'm nominally Presbyterian, but stuff like this is driving me nuts. I'd like to give this dude a piece of my mind..."

That's the leftie hezbians for you. Lots of sympathy for any group with car bombs.

218 nimslight  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:33:37am

well no one can call me a racist, because I hate everyone equally

219 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:33:52am
220 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:34:30am

#193 loppyd

I am not Jewish either but Kurian's editorial offends every thinking person. All the tired code words are there:

"...powerful Jewish establishment", "It is well known that Jews constitue the most privleged group in this country.", "Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation...",
"We are dealing with a well funded, well orgnized [Jewish] establishment.", "Jews must ownup to their privlege in America..."

Mr Kurian has written a noxious, anti-semitic screed; he's David Duke in academic glad rags.

221 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:35:13am

Mr. Kurian:

G-d blesses those that bless the Jews and curses those that curse the Jews.

-- Torah

222 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:35:16am

#212 Just Right of Middle

I know exactly who and what she is, thank you very much.

SHE condones using children for human shields, and she calls our soldiers baby-killers.

Mind your own business please.

223 Sword of Beowulf  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:36:22am

Nixon went to Duke's law school.

224 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:37:41am
225 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:38:06am

It has been suggested that Kurian is an imbecile who is unaware of Jewish contibutions to the Civil Rights movement.
I think this is unlikely, he is probably simply another academi-whore going down for Arab grant money or investment capital.
This recycled petro-cash is all pervasive, even when the grants are not direct, and there are ALWAYS strings attached.
It is one of the many dirty secrets of post 60s academia here and in Europe and also has a pronounced influence on certain business sectors, notably those who depend of venture capital.

226 heyniceboard  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:38:51am

""It is well known that Jews constitute the most privileged “minority” group in this country. Among the top 10 universities, Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation: Only the California Institute of Technology has an undergraduate Jewish population below 10 percent, and four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.""

Actually, those percentages are almost tied with Asian-Americans (4% of American population, including under-achievers such as the Pakistani, Hmong and Philipino-American populations). Unlike most Jews, Asian-Americans are a very visible minority. Ambition, diligence, dedication and intelligence are the crucial elements; no one would think that Asian-Americans in American society today are artificially privileged.

From American Heritage dictionary, "privilege": A special advantage, immunity, permission, right, or benefit granted to or enjoyed by an individual, class, or caste.

227 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:39:35am
228 squeegy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:40:44am

There is a myth amongst the left that representation in any field must be proportional to the demographics of the population. Any rationally objective human being knows this isn't true. But the liberals perpetuate it anyways.

Just because Jews have a dispproportionately high representation in the education system does not indicate presence of conspiracy. The Asian population is also highly represented in the educational system.

Why then are Blacks overly represented in the National Basketball Association? Is there an NAACP conspiracy to monopolize the inflated salaries and endorsements in this particular sporting industry? Why aren't Mexicans better represented in this sport? Does not the Latin American segment constitute a vast percentage of the population in this country?

229 Partizaner  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:40:47am

Looking on Kurian's bio, I notice that one of his influences is Freud. That is right, the Jew, Freud.

Sounds like a case of circumcision envy to me. Let's get to the root of his psychosis.

230 zonekeeper  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:40:55am

Wow...way OT, but ya'll need to see this.

I'm almost drawn to tears myself, however all I need for that is the picture that inspired the ad. It's being reported that this is the single largest ad buy for the election so far, I guess from both sides.


And to those LLL's who would see this not for what it is, but instead twist it into something it's not...

GO TO HELL. You are the enemy and we no longer are fooled.

--

231 TMF  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:43:20am

Real Clear Politics polling updates have Bush down 1 in FL and 2 in OH. Not good. He needs to be up by 4 to be safe, or close to safe with all of the crack for votes fraud going on.

232 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:43:40am
233 ShanNYC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:44:54am

#212 Right of middle

You and others here who believe Mr. Kurian's race is an issue are engaged in the same race-baiting Mr, Kurian himself is guilty of in his article. But I suppose it is trollish for me to point that out.

I also see that you have ignored the second part of my question: Does Mr. Kurian's race make his drivel any more or less offensive?

234 JohnAnnArbor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:45:55am

#229--

And the one he picks is a pseudoscientific charlatan. I didn't realize how much Freud just made stuff up (rather than actually doing research) until recently.

235 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:46:07am
236 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:48:06am

I reported here a Jew was shot to death in the West Bank.

Family has been notified. He was a soldier.

237 Right Wing Nutt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:51:34am

KerrySpot is reporting that fox poll also, good news I suppose

238 kamala  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:52:10am

I submitted this feedback--think the moderator will include it?

Philip, Good start, but your point would have been stronger if you went beyond talking about how many Jews are at top universities and also pointed out how a disproportionate number of Jews are rich, run World banks, run Hollywood, and bake matzah with the blood of Christian children.
239 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:52:32am
240 Furious J  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:53:01am

OT: The Kerry Spot has the 411 on a new 527 ad that will be airing in Battleground states. Here's an excerpt:

Lynn Faulkner (Ashley's father): "My wife, Wendy, was murdered by terrorists on September 11th."

Narrator: "The Faulkners' daughter Ashley closed up emotionally. But when President George W. Bush came to Lebanon, Ohio, she went to see him as she had with her mother four years before."

Linda Prince (a friend of the Faulkners): "He walked toward me and I said 'Mr. President this young lady lost her mother in the World Trade Center.' "

Ashley Faulkner: "And he turned around and he came back and he said 'I know that's hard, are you all right?' "

Prince: "Our president took Ashley in his arms and just embraced her. And it was at that moment that we saw Ashley's eyes fill up with tears."

Ashley Faulkner: "He's the most powerful man in the world and all he wants to do is make sure I'm safe, that I'm OK."

Lynn Faulkner: "What I saw was what I want to see in the heart and in the soul of the man who sits in the highest-elected office in our country."

241 Rantworst  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:54:06am

Slightly to the right of Off topic:

242 ConIL  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:56:36am

OT: but I don't get it. Is this LGF blog conservative or zionist/jewish? or some combination? Do zionists now vote Republican? Aren't most zionist congresspeople liberal Democrats or LLL's like Boxer and Feinstein and Charles Schumer? What the H is going on here??

243 Blackhorse  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:57:13am

I watched a history program on A&E the other night. It was about the Nazi propaganda war machine against the Jews.

The editorial column by Philip Kurian is very much the same Jew hatred rhetoric as that of the documented Nazi propaganda.

Fact: Such propaganda resulted in the Mass Murder of millions of civilian Jews.

What's your point Philip Kurian ? Do you want to stroke up the Furnaces and Gas Chambers again?

244 Pickle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:58:36am

Why are the closet antisemites coming out and saying this sort of thing, these days? Because nobody's denouncing and shunning them when they do, as used to be the case. The opposition is gone. In fact, most of this scumbag's academic facultymembers will probably be nodding their heads in self-satisfied agreement--another fine product of their hateful teachings.

245 Paco from Sefarad  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:58:48am

#242 ConIL

Please leave your assumptions at the door. Thank you.

246 Damian P.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:59:43am

Real Clear Politics polling updates have Bush down 1 in FL and 2 in OH.

Must be all these letters from Guardian readers, convincing Ohio voters to support Kerry.

247 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:00:51am
248 militarybrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:01:20am

ConIL

Check the FAQs. (and I'm typing this in a friendly sort of way, but nuance doesn't show up in print)

Hee Hee. I used nuance in reference to myself.

I can't wear flip flops today because it is raining.

249 IDFDave  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:01:46am

hmmm...
there seems to be some people who agree with his editorial, I wonder what they have in common???

"I enjoyed your article, however you did not dwell on recent Jewish problems such as 9/11 and the war in Iraq."
[Link: www.americanfreepress.net...]

Mohammed Marouf
giftsoftime@hotmail.com
Engineer
California"


"I can see form the letters received that the Jewish lobby is getting into high gear to try and silence you.

From the occupations of the letter writers you can see just how much Jews are overrepresented in society. I see here a doctor, a lawyer, a librarian and lots of students.

This jewish power must be stopped. You forgot to mention all the Jews who steal all the nobel prizes instead of leaving them for others.

Jahaan Badour
rentgin@hotmail.com
Computers
New York"

"I am glad you have the courage to stand up to the Jews. I agree with everything in your article, except you pointed out that the holocaust is a fact, when in reality what happenned is still open for debate.
"
Ayman Belghazi
Student
Michigan

250 Right Wing Nutt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:01:53am

Confirmed, BUSH IS UP 7 in FOX poll...very good news, even after convention they only had him up like 4?

251 mglazer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:02:32am

Free speech is not always pleasant speech yet it is free for anyone to speak their mind no matter how vile it may seem to you with exception as a responsible member of a free society

Speech that incites or is used to inflame that might lead to or cause violence can be deemed illegal in certain contexts

As we have seen freedom is never free and free people can be free to do bad things

So were does this leave humanity?

There are always extremes in the world

As all blessed people know balance is essential in life to maitnain fortitude throughout our limited time journey

We dont eat chocolate all day even though it tastes great and makes us happy because we know that can be harmful

So too must we balance freedom with respect to liberty

Freedom is free to do liberty is free to be

You are free to do but I am free to be, if you use your freedom to not let me be you are abusing it and no longer free to do so. Abusing freedom not meeting the blance is a fine line and will probably always be everchanging and debatable based on context and perspectives

Freedom includes respect of others or at least concern for their safety that is known as responsiblity.

The patriot act is a great example
We balance freedom with security due to our current perspective and context which might change and this balance newly realized

Oh and BTW

I LOVE BUSH -- all sorts :)


FIGHT TERRORISM

Minnesota - The only state to oppose Reagan (and vote for Mondale!) flirts with conservatism

[Link: slate.msn.com...]

It is a new era - the young people are not as easily fooled and manipulated we are smarter and better
we have values and we are willing to sacrifice for righteousness when necessary

No one likes to kill but will do so naturally when required

252 Pooh  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:03:56am

#242 ConIL

"OT: but I don't get it. Is this LGF blog conservative or zionist/jewish? or some combination? Do zionists now vote Republican? Aren't most zionist congresspeople liberal Democrats or LLL's like Boxer and Feinstein and Charles Schumer? What the H is going on here??"

Oy vey.

253 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:04:43am
254 I. Melvin  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:05:32am

From Haman to Hitler to Hamas and now to the fans of Coach K, it's always the same.

Want to find the locus of evil? Look for those wanting to be rid of the Jews.

255 TMF  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:06:59am

Conil

"Labels are meaningless"

/John Kerry

256 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:07:22am

#203 Slim, your theory doesn't hold up because Kurian preempts it with

While Jews undoubtedly lay claim to a long history of racism and genocide that continues across the world today, this characterization does not transport perfectly to the United States. After World War II, overt anti-Semitism gradually subsided, in part because of American response to Hitler’s murderous regime, but largely due to Jewish association with whiteness and the privileges white skin affords. In short, Jews can renounce their difference by taking off the yarmulke. Clearly, this is not a luxury enjoyed by all minority groups.

Apparently you did not read the whole article.

257 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:08:38am
258 cantrecant  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:08:44am

#197 just right of middle

Dang, can't a brother get his props around here? I put that link in on post 56.

You are tasting what it's like to dash yourself against the vast MSM stone wall. Not really, sorry about that, skipping through the comments I just happened to see it first in Charles' post.

259 Paco from Sefarad  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:10:28am

#249 IDFDave

From the occupations of the letter writers you can see just how much Jews are overrepresented in society. I see here a doctor...


Antisemite slime slithers into any crack it can find, even the "prestigious" British Medical Journal has allowed itself to become a platform for gratuitous Jew hatred.

I'm only somewhat heartened to see that most of the comments on the article denounce it.

260 Spiritualized  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:11:08am

Leftist politics taken to their logical conclusion:

Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron, written in 1961:

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

(...)

[Hazel] had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn’t think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.

Rest of the short story at the above link.

261 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:14:03am

Talkin Kammel...

Maybe you can clear something up for me?...

I always thought that the NAZIs were the National SOCIALIST Party of Germany rather than conservatives...am I confused!

262 ibn Abu  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:14:12am

There's a series of comments among the mostly anti-Kurian comments on the websites written under Arabic names and saying pretty outlandish things. These are actually pretty funny if intended as satire. Sadly, I think they are serious.

263 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:14:25am
264 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:15:21am

Greetings From Pennsylvania

I'm in Bethlehem, PA for a panel discussion tonight with Kos and the Wonkette. I'll report on that event later. In the meantime, check out the new pro-Bush ad by Progress for America. It's called Ashley's Story, and it's powerful.

[Link: powerlineblog.com...]

Ashley's Story

[Link: www.ashleysstory.com...]

Never forget...Never forgive!

265 RC neo-Jew  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:15:52am

#244 Pickle

Why are the closet antisemites coming out and saying this sort of thing, these days? Because nobody's denouncing and shunning them when they do, as used to be the case.

Not only that, but supposed 'moral leaders' don't just fail to denounce, but encourage the haters. Some here have already mentioned Presbyterians meeting sympathetically with a terrorist organisation. Anglicans threaten to disinvest in Israel but make no attempt to discourage palestinians from terrorism.

266 thinkingmom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:17:06am

This ranting piece of garbage by a senior at a respected University demonstrates, among other things, how far the university has fallen. The guy writes like he doesn't have a clue that the university's mission is to educate the most able students it can attract. It's as if the concept of academic merit is utterly alien to him. The sheer anti-intellectualism of it is stunning.
Here in California, Asians dominate the best UC schools, and I'm sure Jews are "overrepresented" too. So what? This guy ought to be publicly rebuked by the university for this ignorant, incendiary screed. Maybe Duke could even assert that it stresses academic merit in admissions, and not bogus "diversity" unrelated to ability to succeed at intellectual endeavor.

267 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:17:11am
268 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:17:32am

#256 Roger

I did read the whole thing. It's that last part that was most telling...

He as a black can't lose his skin and assimilate. He believes Jews can (assimilate). That's his rationalization for his frustration with the fact that Jews have succeeded in America and his minority hasn't (particularly).

This is a theme among blacks all the time. It's embarassing to them that other later-arriving minorities (Asians, Latins) are succeeding here better than blacks are, and even without affirmative action in some cases.

I just don't think he's Judenhass, but clearly there's only that one opinion that welcome here. So perhaps I should go.

270 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:20:05am

Some idle thoughts:

For the past 30 years, and certainly for the last 3, the academic left has done everything possible to excuse, legitimize, and glorify terrorist violence by those with whom the left sympathizes. There is no atrocity too depraved to be excused, no brutality worthy of their qualified denunciation---if it comes from their side.

One of their favorite tropes, the "cycle of violence," in fact exploits the power of terrorism by implying that defensive measures will simply make the problem worse (leaving surrender as the only option, in case that is not obvious).

The academic left has not been the target of violence; but, given all this, it is apparent that they would be highly susceptible to it.
Why else would they believe so ardently that the willingness to commit atrocities is a test of legitimacy ("poor desperate people resort to desperate measures")?

Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

271 zulubaby  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:21:19am
I just don't think he's Judenhass, but clearly there's only that one opinion that welcome here.

You're more than entitled to your opinion. It happens to be wrong.

272 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:23:51am
273 glwing  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:24:11am

Those discussing the Presbyterians:

Be aware that there are two branches. The Presbyterians USA are left/liberal---very.

I did not link to the article but noted that the post said US Presbyterian and they have been referring to the USA branch.

274 ckrall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:25:02am

From Pharoh, to Herod, to Hitler, to Hamas, humanity continues to try to rid themselves of the Jews "Gods chosen people" When will they learn?

275 norar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:29:38am

Next thing you hear, some schtinkers complaining that Jewish scientists get priveleged treatment on Nobel Prize Commettee. Or may be not, after all they would not be able to claim 'Holocaust exploitation' as Jewish scientist were "overrepresented" among the Nobel Prize laureates long before that.

276 gymnast  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:29:46am

I'm sure that my Man, The Rev. Al is appreciative of Mr Kurians efforts at moving the race forward as a force for the future. Al is pleased with affirmative achievements and is currently seeking to institute a program of double affirmative action to speed up the process. Mr Kurian fits right in with Al's ideas about gettin' ahead by moving others behind, which is a key component of Al's new ideas about civil rights.

277 cottus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:30:12am

Oy Vay! (did I get that right?)

Is that all it takes to raise your chances of getting into Harvard? Be Jewish? Sign me up! Where's my Yamulka?

And to think all these years it had to to with intelligence and ability, or legacy or being black or something. But to just be Jewish! Still sounds too simple, though. I bet it's harder to get into "respectable" Universities than that.

278 ConIL  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:35:08am

#267

Someone answered my Q "Oy Vey" and there are about 10+ links to Israeli newspapers on the side bar, so I am concluding this site is less USA conservative and slightly more interested in jewishness and zionism.

And PS I did read the FAQ, so sorry about applying labels. Have fun, you people. But if Bush wins and appoints conservative justices to the Supreme Court, I don't want to see ANY two-faced backstabbing and whining against the man GWBush at that point. No cafeteria GWB supporters here I hope.

Ciao.

279 Buck  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:35:18am

#242 ConIL

Ya, why don't these people fit into the nice round hole a good round peg should fit into?

What will happen next?

280 Atlas Wannabe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:35:54am

And for those of you on the free speech soapbox, please note that the feedback on the article must be accepted by their moderator before being posted.

What cowards...

281 ibn Abu  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:42:07am

#275

Someone commenting on the Duke article made exactly that argument. Still unsure whether it's a joke.

282 zulubaby  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:42:23am
Have fun, you people.

Kush meer in toches.

283 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:42:48am

#180

#165 Yankev,

Yeah, I do, but not here at the office. One example is in the first mishneh in one of the perakim of Meseches Shabbos (8? 7? 9?) that starts "Av melachos arbaim chasar achas" -- the Fathers of Melacha are 40 minus one. A melacha quite obviously cannot have a father -- Av in this sense means principal category.

Elsewhere in the same mesechta are discussions about whether a given act is an Av melacha or a toldah (lit. "generation" or "offspring") of that Av. Again, Av in this case means category.

Wait a minute -- I DO havee a source here. Introduction from Artscroll's edition of Avos says that the tractate is called Avos because it is address to parents, with advice about raising proper Jewish offspring. The introduction then cites two other sources who say that the title refers to Avraham, Yitzhak and Yakov. THEN , citing Midrash Shmuel, the editor continues "Alternatively, the term Avos is used to mean 'major categories,' within which there are subcategories, in the same sense there are 39 major categories of forbiden work on the Sabbath, each of which has its own subcategories. So too, the major principles of human ethical behavior are to be found here . . . "

I think I first came upon this explanation in Bunim, "Ethics from Sinai."
Yakov

284 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:44:18am

Attention, lefties concerned about "free speech"

There is no constitutional right to immunity from criticism, disagreement and opposition.
There is no constitutional right to the forum of one's own choice.
There is no constitutional right to be taken seriously.

In fact, the standard lefty tactic of characterizing criticism as an attack on free speech is, itself, a demand for censorship and oppression, since it equates opposition speech with the criminal offense of suppressing constitutional rights.

Think about it.

285 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:46:58am

#274 ckrall

You forgot Hamman!

Today we eat Hammantashen.

286 militarybrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:47:33am

zulubaby:

What does that mean? Something worth adding to my repertoire?

I've found my french cursing fairly useful - the Russian even more since it SOUNDS rude even when it isn't. I use the Russian to yell at my kids when they're being bad and I don't want to be quoted by Social Services.

When they hear, "I'm going to beat your butt!" in Russian, they straighten up a lot quicker than when I say it in English.

Spanish has the best names to call people so far, though, in my experience.

287 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:50:21am

Wasn't it Orwell who said "some propositions are so absurd they can only be believed by imbeciles and academics".

(I'm an academic by the way, and its pretty lonely here in Canada with this band of merry socialists who are pumped up on anti-americanism).

288 Nannette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:50:26am

The idiot has quoted Normal Finkelstein who's come head to head with Prof. Alan Dershowitz on a number of occasions...

[Link: www.democracynow.org...]


Did Alan Dershowitz Borrow Shamelessly from a Discredited History Book?
By Norman G. Finkelstein

Have your say!

[Link: hnn.us...]

289 glwing  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:50:37am

#278 ConIL


Have fun, you people.


As a Catholic you votes Republican I am about as rare as a Jewish Republican so guess that makes me one of "you people".

Why do I find the term "you people" obnoxious? Hmmm, could be that it reminds me of the very topic we are discussing here.

290 Powderfinger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:51:21am

#280 Atlas Wannabe

To give credit where it's due, the comments are overwhelmingly negative. Mine was posted.

291 RC neo-Jew  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:51:26am

#273 glwing

I hope the other branch of the Presbyterians doesn't go down the same path.

Some Church organisations are working hard to spread the poison among the different denominations. As I write, not far away an intense, angry women from Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel is giving a talk to a church group about her 'experiences' in the 'West Bank'.

zombie has gone up even higher in my estimation - already very high. I thought of attending the talk, but then the thought of being alone in a room full of rabid Jew-haters kidding themselves that they are being virtuous by demonising Israelis, and indulging in hatred... it scared me!

/shudder

292 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:51:42am

#286 militarybrat

It means "Kiss my ass!"

293 glwing  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:52:00am

you=who

That is what happens when the phone rings while you are typing.
Grrr

294 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:53:25am
I just don't think he's Judenhass, but clearly there's only that one opinion that welcome here. So perhaps I should go.

Your stubborn refusal to recognize Judenhass when it is being sprayed in your face is a sign of either stupidity or unsavory agenda. Neither is welcome here.

295 a girl called Alex  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:54:07am

OT: thought this would bring a laugh for you all - via the Corner at NRO (this will send you to a video at slate):

John Edwards, pretty as a picture

I can't believe a man could spend that much time on his hair. God help me, I watched the whole thing.

296 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:54:18am

Hmmm...Does anyone doubt that Mr. Kurian got into Duke U based on Affirmative Action? I'm thinking it was not based on his analytical skills.

297 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:56:37am

Slightly Right of OT:

Faced with extraditing a Terrorist Cleric from London - the Brits Finally get it Right

Radical cleric in Britain charged with urging murder of non-Muslims

298 Morgan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:56:55am

The sad reality is that many Jewish students go off to college hoping to make friends of all races, religions and nationalities, but are subject to such hatred from Muslims and "undrerepresented minorites" that they leave college bitter, angry and more than a little bigoted. I know that was my experience, as well as the experience of many of my Jewish friends.

299 karmic_inquisitor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:59:06am

four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.

A little less than 1% of the US population is incarcerated. Over 5% has a criminal record.

What is the representation of these "minorities" in leading US universities?

300 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:59:32am
Ciao.

Yeah, go fuck a chainsaw.

301 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:00:18am

"I just don't think he's Judenhass, but clearly there's only that one opinion that welcome here. So perhaps I should go."

That reminds me, I neglected to address another important lefty-academic "right" in my #284---there is no consitutional right to feel welcome, comfortable or accepted.

302 glwing  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:00:30am

#300


Big OUCH!!!


LOL

303 Florida Lady  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:01:03am

I really wish the liberal Jewish people in South Florida who have voted en masse for the liberal Democrats in the past would take a very close look at stuff like this . . .
and I wish they would realize that, by continuing their voting in that vein, they are cutting the throats of the Israelis

304 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:04:18am

*Sigh* That's how it started in France, around 1985. If you're Jewish and living in the U.S., you'd better prepare your kids to making aliyah.

305 mglazer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:05:04am

If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.

Free citizens need to be able to withstand some criticism when holding a minority opinion

It is tough to not be cloistered and accepted but it is better to stand your ground in a tough crowd

Responsible mature humans can do that

I went to a kerry rally with a mocking sign that said

"Terror isn't sooo bad!"

Strogn-willed, confident, and those with balanced mature ersponsible respectful values can go into a room with those of another opnion without the need to run away to feel okay

It is not a mature or strong sign to flee in teh face of incredible odds it is much better to stand your ground and not flip flop

-- that is why in this day and age BUSH will win!

306 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:14:18am

In the event no one has seen this yet..

AMSTERDAM — An 18-year-old Jewish girl's diary which describes her last month of imprisonment during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands has been discovered. Echoing the famous Anne Frank diary, the new find tells of both the terror and the mundane aspects of life during the Holocaust.


Her name was Helga Deen. She was murdered in Sobibor.

307 yellowroseoftexas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:14:49am

There's a new website that is trying to stop the ISM and get them deported. [Link: www.stoptheism.com...]
If you have any info on the ISM that can help the website,please email them and let them know.

308 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:16:26am

mglazer #251

Freedom includes respect of others or at least concern for their safety that is known as responsiblity.

Maybe nit-picking, or maybe very important. I'd say freedom includes respect for the rights of others, but not respect for others. If rights are respected, others will be left to live their lives and no harm will be done.

Respecting others goes beyond that and is part of the PC, multi-culti BS that attempts to require everyone to respect cultures and traditions that, by the standards of their own culture and traditions, they might find abhorrent.

309 kid charlemagne  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:16:44am
310 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:17:02am

Thoughtful and hateful, and couched ever so slightly in civility, with a nod to decency at the end. Very well done.

For an asshole who is clearly educated way beyond his intelligence.

Basically, Kurian is an ignorant fool who little truly understands what a Jew is and what being Jewish means, especially in this country. Even if he is a Jew, which is possible--self-loathing is as common among us as among the rest of humanity--he has no real idea, and he should keep his opinions about things he knows poorly to himself.

What Philip Kurian also apparently fails to understand is that anti-Semitism is rife in America, and is not just aimed at the so-called "privileged" Jews. Not all of us were able to afford to go to college, where we would be able to place our names above such vile, specious filth as what this Trinity Senior has written, yet we still feel Duke's support of terrorism is wrong. Clearly, Duke has harkened back to the southern staples of hatred and racism, but this new evil is couched in the liberal mantle of free speech instead of support for slavery. Good for Duke; every nation should have at least one institution of higher learning where the vile-minded are allowed to roam freely, and are free from all social responsibility. Good Job Duke.

But bear this in mind too: Whether Jews alone comprise a so-called privileged minority is debatable, but what is not debatable is the good that Jews have brought to the world. What is also not debatable is that we are now armed. More important, we are fully prepared to use those arms in our defense wherever that need arises. We will never again let shallow, hateful, small-minded people like Kurian take us to the ovens; and so people like him can prattle till even they tire of hearing themselves. Words are words. We Jews know better, and that's all that matters.

But a small word of warning to people who may find companionship and pleasure in Kurian's words. Keep it at just words, for if it ever grows beyond words you will find that Jews are much more than the stupid sheep you seem to think them.

Hate monger and Jew-hater. Thus I brand Philip Kurian.

311 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:18:07am

#278 ConIL

Buh-bye, asshole!

Wishing you many years of hemmeroids. Big, bulgy ones in reverse proportion to your brain.

312 Teacake!  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:19:30am

Seems the alpha-people love minorities who do not do as well in life as they do. And you have the bleeding hearts who sympathize with the criminal elements for after all those people went bad due to all the injustices they have faced thoughout life... which explains why they hate Jews... a minority that in general does very well in life and a minority that has endured generations of injustices, remains to have a low criminal element. If only Jews would behave like all the other minorities.

313 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:21:41am

Put his words in the mouth of Louis Farakan(sp). The fact that he is black makes what he is saying even more dispicable! Last time I checked there is no affirmative action program for Jewish people. The folks he seeks to disparage got where they are because they earned it and were the best qualified for Christs sake...

HE IS A MOONBAT MORON MAKING EXCUSES FOR HIS FAILURES>

314 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:22:41am

#287 Jonny

Oooh-you're a non-LLL academic in Canada? How amazing. I'm in Toronto-where are you?

315 Da Coyote  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:23:01am

With all due respects to the many folks who are "fuzzy" majors and actually have a brain, THIS article is a prime reason why we in the sciences do not consider a "fuzzy" degree from an ivy college to be worth sneezing at. This guy is right out of the dark ages...and probably considers Bush to be dumb. Lessee the Duke guy try flying a fighter.

316 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:23:24am

#210 So Cal Justice:

I wonder what prompted that girl to leave the university and Islam after she'd more or less won her point? That's the part of the story that I find most fascinating and that's missing.

317 ploome hineni[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:25:27am
318 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:25:36am

Typical "liberal" -- the evil, overbearing, rapacious Jews are exceeding their quotas. We have to scale back university admissions of Jews in order to make our universities look more "like America". The clear implication of this misguided man is that government should discriminate on the basis of race and religion. This fellow is one more reason why the liberals of today have become the fascists of yesterday.

Whatever happened to merit based admissions? Is the author suggesting that these Jewish students don't belong at Duke and the other academic institutions but have been given preferential treatment? It would seem to be the case, otherwise, the statistics only prove that a lot of Jewish kids were smart enough and hard working enough to earn places at these universities.

This guy also suffers from plantation mentality, as if to say -- "if you are a minority, that it's damned uncivil of you to make contributions and achieve things in a measure larger than your numbers or status as a minority should permit. At least if you are going to be a minority, have the decency to act like one."

He tries to sugar coat his bias by passing off trite compliments to the Jews. The author may not engage in wild rhetorical flourishes, but this piece is as fundamentally racist as they get.

1,000 Quatloos to the first person that can pull some editorials from Euro papers in the 1930's and find striking similarities with this piece.

319 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:29:21am

#318 Studsup

I'm not sure how much is available on line, but the quotas inflicted upon the Jews of Germany for the best high schools and universities (then any schooling at all) is well documented in books about the period. There is one in particular-I can't remember the name now-that documents the role of academia in the Holocaust. A classic, quite devastating. If anyone wants the name, I'll try to remember the title, I read it a while ago...

320 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:29:55am

#298 morgan

I know that was my experience, as well as the experience of many of my Jewish friends.

ditto.

321 Blackhorse  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:32:55am

#183 selpaw


I agree with you.

322 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:33:11am

#300 Q

You got a way with words ;)

323 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:33:16am

#314 Writer Mom:

You're in Toronto? So am I. Scarborough--right on the Bluffs overlooking Lake Ontario. We should have a TO meet-up sometime. I'm sure there are others here; Shiksa Girrl is in TO too.

324 WriterMom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:35:13am

#323 foreign devil

How cool-I didn't know you were here. I've had the pleasure of doing lunch with scaramouche several times-she's also here in Toronto. And-check your e-mail, I just sent you a note about something else.

Let's tawk!

325 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:35:13am

#268 Slim,

This is a theme among blacks all the time.

You apparently don't know many black people either.

Nearly every black friend I have has come a long way as individuals/teenagers and are proud of their achievements and aren't spending time with your-attributed-to-blacks theme at all. Hopefully wet-behind-the-ears Kurian will experience the knocks of life and realize his writing and thinking stinks; maybe sooner if he reads the feedback(read some of them; their great!) responses and criticisms of his last poor attempt at writing drivel and takes it seriously. Realize that his article and last sentence in particular is a nonsensical tautology. According to him 3% of the population must own up to their privilege in America, use it more wisely, or our democracy cannot be preserved. My words: if there is any connection between owning up to privilege and democratic preservation, it takes a hell of a larger percentage than 3%!

One of my best friends came from Nigeria; worked and worked and payed his dues just like me. He drove cab in New York; job after job going to school part-time till he could go full-time and today, as a professor, teaches material science at a well known university. Never looked over at the next guy or felt that he had to 'lose his skin to assimulate' as you say. He is just one of many. He would just shake his head at your asshattery.

FYI, there aren't many blacks immigrating in China or Iran.

326 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:35:21am

1000 Quatloos is bid. Do I hear 2000??? 2000 Quatloos??? Provider #1 wins the bid.

327 Hhar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:36:24am

OK. So this jerk is saying that I sweated through highschool to get scholarshuips, paid for my multiple degrees MYSELF by working, and I managed that because I'm shockingly overprivileged? Because somehow someone else felt guilty over the Holocaust?

An idiot and a whiner, that's what he is, and he's going toa schol I could not have afforded to go to. There's a lesson there...

328 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:36:24am

#323 foreign devil

Shiksa Girrl is in TO too.

Et moi aussi. (I learned that in high school.)

329 yellowroseoftexas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:36:46am

291# NeoJew
At one time I was really shocked whenever I read about Christians and church groups supporting the Palestinian cause considering the fact that so many Palestinians supported terrorism.Now I am not really surprised at anything the liberal Christians do anymore.I really think most of them are really antisemitic.There is no other way to describe people who constantly condemn Israel any and every chance they get and yet never criticize the poor Palestinians even when they see the brutal murder of a pregnant Jewish women and her children as a legitimate act of resistance [Link: northernva.typepad.com...]
And when Palestinians celebrate the murders of Jewish civilains including children. [Link: humphrys.humanists.net...]
I am not surprised these people met with Hezbollah. I think they have alot in common when it comes to their opinions on the Jews. They want them all dead.

330 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:37:17am

#323 foreign devil

There is a meetup in TO every month, although it is almost always cancelled because we can't get enough people to attend.

331 AW  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:41:14am

Since I just had a good meal, I'm not going to read past the first paragraph. I just want to note that the citation from Pirkei Avot is incomplete.

20. Rabbi Tarfon said: The day is short, the task is great, the laborers are lazy, the wage is abundant and the master is urgent.

21. He used to say: It is not incumbent upon you to finish the task. Yet, you are not free to desist from it. If you have studied much in the Torah much reward will be given you, for faithful is your employer who shall pay you the reward of your labor. And know that the reward for the righteous shall be in the time to come.

Being righteous and studying Torah is the task. What does this have to do with Tikkun Olam? What does that have to do with protesting a pro-Palestinian conference? Whats the point of this paragraph?

332 lmg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:42:05am

It's going to take a couple of generations to undo the damage to our society caused by the Left. They've brainwashed people into believing that eveyone is the same - same abilities, same interests - and any superiority demonstrated by any group is "wrong". It must be enormously stressful to maintain this nonsense in the face of the facts of everyday life. Perhaps that's why they have become so hateful.

Jews are not "overrepresented" in elite institutions for a group with an average IQ 1 standard deviation above the average and a culture that emphasises study and intellectual achievement. The ones overrepresented are the members of government-favored minority groups who have no business being there, but are placed there by deliberate policies of discrimination against whites, Asians and Jews. There follows their inevitable falling short, and a cooking of books to hide the truth, and public and self-deception to continue the farce. This psychological gymnastics and denial of reality cannot be healthy for any of us.

333 Teacake!  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:43:30am

I don't think I saw this other DUKE situation posted yet.
---PART ONE---
1st day report on PSM Conference Date: 10/16/2004

We have received the following information from Stand With Us sources attending the first day's events at the Palestinian Solidarity Movement conference taking place at Duke.

This is an annual conference of
pro-Palestinian activists nationwide to come together and plan their anti Israel agenda for the next year and participate in anti Israeli workshops.

As completely expected, speakers at the PSM (Palestinian Solidarity Movement) conference white-washed the Palestinian terrorist groups and said that terrorist groups like HAMAS and ISLAMIC JIHAD are a result of the creation of Israel...

Some highlights from today's "LESSONS"

INFILTRATING THE ORGANIZED JEWISH GROUPS THROUGH HILLEL

HIllel is a good way to infiltrate the organized Jewish community on campus. Because Hillel is a democracy, Hillel makes it easy to get involved...Some Hillels have brought refusniks to speak... so it will be easy to get "in" and get on their boards..."Take a position on their boards"...That Hillel's guiding principles agree with Zionism but that different viewpoints are encouraged---so get inside... and control the debate.

INCITEMENT of YOUNG CHILDREN IN AMERICA AGAINST ISRAEL -

Palestine Education Project (PEP for short) (This is for young children...around America)

Ora Wise led this session. (She is the link between the ISM and the PSM) Here is what people were told to do:

Contact teachers all over the country, NOT PRINCIPALS... go directly to teachers...so you can get in...go to inner city schools. Speak to minority kids... Once in a classroom, here is how you teach about the Israeli oppression:

Give a kid some water, but give other kids a lot of water. Give some kids toys and other kids no toys. Talk about the comparisons. The Israelis have the toys, the water. The Palestinians have nothing (and it is the fault of Israelis. Blame the Israelis)

Get children to draw photos of their families in their homes. Then show them all the photos of what a Palestinian child would draw, reflecting oppression. (you can order these special pictures) Get a hoolahoop. Get the classroom of kids to stand close together around the hoolahoop. Then put a
child in the middle of the hoolahoop. The child in the hoolahoop is the Israeli. He has lots of space. All the water. Everyone else is crowded and uncomfortable...

For more information and materials for the PEP program...

Palestine_in_school@yahoo.com

PRESBYTERIAN DIVESTMENT

They will use the Presbyterian Church to get the Episcopal Church to also divest from companies who do business with Israel... Work to Isolate Israel from the world community through divestment... BUILD BRIDGES between different campus groups..

NASSER ABUFARHA--author of the Alternative Palestinian Agenda, and doctoral candidate of Cultural Anthropology of the University of Wisconsin. Some of his thoughts:

Israel, THE COLONY, is not supported by any other state but by a Jewish population all around the world...The very IDEA of a Jewish state is the problem. There should be no talk of a Jewish state. Ending the occupation will NOT end the struggle. Pulling out tanks will not end the struggle. The STRUGGLE is to END the state of Israel. We should not be expected to give up our country to MAKE ROOM FOR ISRAEL

Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah... are not radical groups... they are the logical outcome of the establishment of a Jewish state on Arab land. PFLP (One of Arafats original terrorist groups) is a leftist group. It's only a liberal group. Not a radical group...Challenge the very notion of the Jewish
State. Zionism is incompatible with a two- state solution... The two-state solution can never work...

Talked about the right of Return. The only thing standing in the way of the right of return, is the idea of the Jewish State.

334 sffilk  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:44:32am

Part of the problem now is that Judenhasse wears a suit and tie and is trying to sound scientific.

For those who may not know, the term anti-Semitism was created by a Jew-hater who wanted to make Jew-hatred seem legitimately scientific.

335 The Hardcore One  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:45:04am

Normally, I don't feed trolls, but 278 just crossed the line a bit...

"Someone answered my Q "Oy Vey" and there are about 10+ links to Israeli newspapers on the side bar, so I am concluding this site is less USA conservative and slightly more interested in jewishness and zionism."

And the point of that comment was...? Maybe if you took the time to look around the entire site, you'd discover that there's a good number of people who post here that aren't Jewish, yet feel the same way as our friends who happen to be Jewish do.

So Charles has a ton of links to Israeli newspapers. In the words of that famous philosopher Derrick Coleman:
"WHOOP DE DAMN DOO!"

I figure, the more sources of info out there, the better...and seeing that this is the site that Fact Checks Your Ass™, it's always a good thing to have more places to fact-check than just the rancid crap the MSM here tries to spoon feed us.

Does that make us all Zionists? According to the logic presented in that first comment, I guess it does. And thanks, I'll wear that badge proudly (besides, anything that pisses off the Jihadis is quite alright in my book).

"And PS I did read the FAQ, so sorry about applying labels. Have fun, you people. But if Bush wins and appoints conservative justices to the Supreme Court, I don't want to see ANY two-faced backstabbing and whining against the man GWBush at that point. No cafeteria GWB supporters here I hope."

Geez, as I've seen it, just about everyone here is voting for W in 2 weeks (outside of our resident tin-foil hat wearing trolls, but those opinions we don't count). They may not all agree with his views on some things (read: domestic stuff), but for the most part, we all agree that he's the one to keep this country safe...and that trumps EVERYTHING.

Oh and another thing, asshat...there are some here that are hoping W does just that (like myself)...next time before making assumptions, try reading around other threads than just one and making snap judgements. You'll go much farther in life.

"Ciao"

So long, moby...don't let the door hit ya where the Good Lord split ya...

336 DocDublU  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:45:08am

a sickening transmorgrification of the facts. American Jews arrived in America with nothing...bubkis...and have scratched and clawed their way to positions of power in all industries, universities and cultural settings. They should be blamed for their success? Hurray for the American Jew who knows the value of hard work, suffering and perserverence.

This author has taken his open mindedness so far that his brain has fallen out. The groups who attended and paricipated in the Duke meeting included outright supporters of terrorism. Worse, they foster the anti-Anerican propaganda that breeds the next generation of terrorits. Free speach is not a ablsolute right. The speeker must use caution in choosing his words as the Supreme Court has consistently upheld. The author has choosen to ignore caution and thereby invites anarchy.

337 Teacake!  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:47:03am

PART TWO
---
Talked about the right of Return. The only thing standing in the way of the right of return, is the idea of the Jewish State.

SATYA - from the Ruckus Society

She made the Tiananmen Square analogy with Palestinian child and tank in Israel. She proposed that cutting down the fence in Israel is a viable nonviolent direct action...

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL...

Marty Rosenbluth, is quote, Israel Occupied Territories Specialist

To his credit, Rosenbluth challenged the PSM to eliminate guiding principal number five that does not come out against terrorism. He proposed that the PSM needs to take a stand against terrorism in order to be consistent. International law requires the use of force to distinguish between combatants and civilians. This does not only apply to Israel, international law is a two way street. You cannot condemn Israel for killing children while not condemning suicide bombings and killing children at a pizzeria.
The PSM was handing out leaflets against this stance by Marty Rosenbluth... Rosenbluth also drew attention to the Palestinian State Security Court that Al Gore visited and commended...Rosenbluth says that in actuality these quote, courts are being used to try quote, collaborators (or people who want
democracy...) and the trials are only 15 minutes long, taking place at midnight, and people are executed after these trials.

Amnesty International has met with Hamas, etc... and has been trying to convince them to stop using terrorism

The fourth Geneva convention is explicitly against the use of using human shields and the use of child soldiers...

USE BIRTHRIGHT TO GET TO ISRAEL, then join the ISM--the INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT... cut Israel's fence, be an international witness to Israel's terrorism, stop the bulldozing, etc...

Jessica Rutter presented...she began the divestment campaign at Duke, she went to birthright and then to the ISM. She brought this conference to Duke. Among things said, Jessica wonders about the story of Massada... and if it did take place, what's the difference between those Jews killing themselves and the Palestinians killing themselves?

Israelis kill Palestinians indiscriminately. Occupation stories... horrific stories were told... demonizing Israel...you need internationals to walk with the Palestinians because the Israelis will shoot at
Palestinians if there are no internationals.

338 selpaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:50:19am

#321 Blackhorse
Thank you. This is absolutely essential if we are to get anywhere with this horrible situation. If people want to help and they really care then they must press to make PA & Al Aska a terror organization.
It is difficult to ignore the truth that the PA under the auspices of Yasser Arafat have been the incubator to Hamas & Islamic Jihad as well. He is the granddaddy of them all and should be held accountable.

Part of what I wrote in #84 is yet another truth we need to deal with.

I must add that by legitimizing the palestinian struggle for a homeland and not having deemed the PA a terror organization was a large factor which led to all of this in the first place. By legitimizing the palestinian struggle it served to delegitimize the plight of Israelis and Jews everywhere. It made us into monsters. All to appease the arab street who hate not only Jews but Christians and freedom loving people everywhere.
339 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:53:41am

Grayp, have you seen this?

Sorry if you got upset. It's risky to look at a single post out of context.

340 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:54:40am

This is dated Oct 15, but I wasn't around over the weekend to know if it has already been posted.

Imagine. An anti-sermetic movie aired on gov't TV in Germany and Franc - just for Ramadan.

Last Thursday and Friday - Oct. 7 and 8, 2004 - the Franco-German channel Arte, mostly paid for by the taxpayer, broadcast a very bad French-Egyptian movie by Yousri Nasrallah called "Les portes du soleil". The fact that it was very bad was actually a blessing, for the main purpose of the movie was to show the founders of the state of Israel as moral equivalent to the Nazis


And yes, there are decent French.
apologise to the Jewish people. I feel hurt in my flesh by the despicable Jerome Clement, by the French ministries of Culture and of Foreign Affairs who made me pay for this cloaca of a movie, and for the general apathy that surrounded this scandal. I am deeply sorry about the behaviour of my country, France - my only country, which I have always loved dearly and cannot support today.

341 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:55:39am

Optimist that I am, IMHO the schools aren't teaching how to think. Following that line of thought I'm not sure the students even understand that what they're espousing is anti-semetic (no clue by fours please! I'm not giving them a pass on this one). Of course the flip side is that anti- ___(fill in the blank) is caused by sorely lacking reasoning skills. This is a trend that started long ago and is now coming to fruition.

Even back in the '70's regurgitating what you heard in lectures or read in books written by that prof was enough for most classes. So if one didn't have to reason through an essay, one didn't have to read with a critical eye towards the drivel that was assigned.

342 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:57:16am

#339 Maine's Michael,

Yes, I did, thank you. I've been extremely busy and have not been as consistent as I usually am.

Not to worry, I luv ya...

343 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:58:20am

In each generation, anti-semitism takes on a new cloak.

In our generation, it is the cloaks of 'cultural relativity', and the politicaly correct 'understanding the narrative' of others, even when that 'narrative' is "we want the jews dead and gone'.

344 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:59:09am

Roger #325

One of my best friends came from Nigeria; worked and worked and payed his dues just like me. He drove cab in New York; job after job going to school part-time till he could go full-time and today, as a professor, teaches material science at a well known university. Never looked over at the next guy or felt that he had to 'lose his skin to assimulate' as you say. He is just one of many. He would just shake his head at your asshattery.

Not sure what case you're making since it's well known that African immigrants outperform native-born African-Americans, as does most every immigrant group.

345 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:00:32pm

Scaramouche and Jonny:

Okay! Sounds like a plan--though between here and Christmas will probably be busy but maybe we can squeeze something in. Where do you plan to meet?

346 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:01:37pm

bob with one o

is caused by sorely lacking reasoning skills

reasoning has nothing to do with hate, jealousy, or envy...

347 Swede  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:02:05pm

I wonder what this guy will think 20 years from now when he reads his old stuff. Remove the word "Palestinian" and replace it with "Viet Cong" or "North Vietnamese" and it sounds just like those 60's assclowns on campus back then. I wonder what those former radicals think of their stuff today. Do you think they're proud of it? I doubt it.

And for what it's worth, Duke sucks.

348 Victor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:03:26pm
"What’s worst is that the “Holocaust Industry” uses its influence to stifle, not enhance, the Israeli-Palestinian debate"

The, "Israeli-Palestinian debate".

That's a good one. So now we have the debaters joining the militants, activists and insurgents in slaughtering the innocent.

But give the kid a break; he's just a larval moonbat parroting the elite academic line. He'll grow up and wake up.

349 AW  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:05:38pm

Not all Jews are keen on higher education. For example, Ali G (Sasha Cohen, an Israeli Jew), has this to say at his Harvard commencement speech.



Hearmenow, u iz de most cleverest students in America - some of u iz probably brilliant at counting - ye know...1,2,3...4... I could continue...easy. Others of u will be brilliant at English - have memorised de whole alphabet 'a to x' and even be able to spell words like 'hippototamus'.

I iz also well clever - me was so brainy dat me finished me education 6 years before any of u - at de age of 15 - de teachers had to admit dat dere was nothing else dat dem could teach me. U students has come from every corner of de US from de rainforests of Arizona to de deserts of Alaska. Some of you iz probably never even seen a black man before...allo

350 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:06:30pm

Img #332

Jews are not "overrepresented" in elite institutions for a group with an average IQ 1 standard deviation above the average and a culture that emphasises study and intellectual achievement. The ones overrepresented are the members of government-favored minority groups who have no business being there, but are placed there by deliberate policies of discrimination against whites, Asians and Jews. There follows their inevitable falling short, and a cooking of books to hide the truth, and public and self-deception to continue the farce. This psychological gymnastics and denial of reality cannot be healthy for any of us.

Now you know all IQ tests, college entrance exams, and tests in general are culturally biased.

351 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:07:59pm

What's the big deal? This clown has his opinion and is stating it. I don't see any Jew-bashing, just anger that his pet cause stirred up a hornets nest of those who disagree with him. If his artical was "I hate Jews, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able. I would also support others rights to disagree, boycot, demonstrate, against him and whoever gave him the soapbox.

Apparently he is more interested in racial causes and sees everthing through the "racism" prism. In his ideal world, all societal resources would be divied up by the racial makeup of the society rather than on individual merit. That is after making up for past disgressions.

In reading all of the posts here, maybe he has a point. Could it be that anything that is said that is not pro-israel is automatically deemed anti-semitic? If one agrees with the Palestinian point-of-view, are they automatically anti-semitic? I think not.

Just for the record, I think the Israel/Palestinian problem can be resolved by pulling out most of the settlements and finishing the wall.

352 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:08:15pm

280 Atlas Wannabe 10/19/2004 12:35PM PST
And for those of you on the free speech soapbox, please note that the feedback on the article must be accepted by their moderator before being posted.

What cowards...

***
This is why I posted my response to him here as well, and why I will also send it to the provost at Duke, and to the UMC, and anyone else who might have an e-mail address.

Of course, you realize, this could all be planned... Duke may actually be seeking to become the South's Berkeley.

Hard to say

-SangerM

353 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:08:26pm

grayp,

Thanks for the post about Miss Deen. It surely put my mind back into the proper perspective.

354 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:11:03pm

#341 Bob with one O

Optimist that I am, IMHO the schools aren't teaching how to think. Following that line of thought I'm not sure the students even understand that what they're espousing is anti-semetic


Excuse me. My parents taught me right from wrong, not the schools. Where are their parents?

355 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:13:15pm

#345 foreign devil

I am going home (Australia) next week but I should be back before christmas.

356 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:13:23pm

dustyroadguy,

I agree, although I had to read your post three times.

"reasoning has nothing to do with hate, jealousy, or envy... "

but I'm not sure we agree.

357 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:42pm

grayp (#340):

"I believe that truth and justice will prevail."

The truth is great, and shall prevail,
When none cares whether it prevail or not.

358 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:29pm

#344 a.k.a. Will, read 268.

...other later-arriving minorities...

Maybe Slim meant it more the way you put it, I don't know.

I don't know if your arguement is limited to blacks. Could be any immigrant. Also depends on the definition of performance which sounds difficult to measure.

359 RC neo-Jew  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:39pm

#337 Teacake!

It's horrific - but it all looks so familiar.

Israelis kill Palestinians indiscriminately. Occupation stories... horrific stories were told... demonizing Israel...you need internationals to walk with the Palestinians because the Israelis will shoot at

That's what these creeps are doing. Pretending they are 'working for peace' when really they are working for the dismantling of Israel.

360 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:20:04pm

grayp,

Most of my contemporaries were so busy hating their parents, and capitalism, and America, that right vs wrong got upended too. Again, I'm not giving them a pass but the constant, pervasive propaganda will work against us for a long time to come.

Sorry, but we lost the education system a long time ago.

361 RC neo-Jew  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:20:30pm

#351 anonyrat

If one agrees with the Palestinian point-of-view, are they automatically anti-semitic?

If the palestinian point of view is that the Jewish state should be destroyed and the Jews driven into the sea, then yes.

362 Morgan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:30pm

"What's the big deal? This clown has his opinion and is stating it. I don't see any Jew-bashing, just anger that his pet cause stirred up a hornets nest of those who disagree with him."

The easy answer is to simply change the names around - an article about "the Blacks" which emphasizes crimes committed by blacks, the "Slavery Industry", the fact the affirmative action is the result of Black power and a call for blacks to become more like whites would be racist, whether or not the author wore whites sheets and a hood.

But of course you will never see such an article in a college newspapers, or for that matter similar articles attacking any group but Jews.

363 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:35pm

#357 Q

Oh my. Thank you. (
Coventry Patmore? You can't make this stuff up!)

364 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:54pm

#350 a.k.a. Will

"Stop being Capcious"


#1 - Hmmm now that you mention it --

On the kids SAT ACT prep classes, there wasn't nuttin' in 'dere 'bout selling Crack, slappin yo Ho, bangin in de hood wif my 9, or snoop doggy dog, no why's is OK to call my own peoples N_gga.

The only Spanish in 'dere was on the SAT II Spanish and Advanced Placement Exam.

Lots of Big Big words in the Vocabulary section. You had to read and write AMERICAN English,

. . . yup yup sounds culturrrly biased 2 me.

#2 - Nothing in there testing basketball, track, or football skills.

However -- if you gots really good tape and were an all conference standout: then for the Big 10, Pac 10, SEC, #1 doesn't matter, as long as yo ho can read de stuff to u.

365 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:24pm

Roger #358

Also depends on the definition of performance which sounds difficult to measure.

I think it's usually an economic measure, or how much money you're making.

But Kurian is joining the ranks of Jesse Jackson and Reverend Al, firming up the victim status and blaming others, rather than honoring the example of your Nigerian friend.

366 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:26:19pm

#351 anonyrat, let me guess for the record; you weren't strong at problem solving in high school were you?

367 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:27:05pm

#360 Bob with one O

Sorry, but we lost the education system a long time ago.


Unhappily, I agree with you. And so did my parents. I went to private school in high school. I don't know what I would do if I had children today. militarybrat has my undying admiration. She homeschools her kids - ALL FOUR of them. That woman rocks and her kids will do well.

Byt the way, I hated my parents too. They frankly didn't give a rat's ass. Dad beat me like a gong and it served me well.

368 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:28:27pm

#361 - you got me

If the palestinian point of view is that the Jewish state should be destroyed and the Jews driven into the sea, then yes.

I should have been more clear - there are those that support the "moderate" palestinian cause (remove settlements, palestinian state, etc.). Anyone who agrees with the "drive them into the sea" crowd would surely be deemed an anti-semite.

I guess my bigger point was that anyone that disagrees with Israel or the cause of zionism is branded an anti-semite regardless of their reasoning. There is no way to have intelligent discourse if certain positions are automatically off the table.

Until Arafat is taking a dirt nap (natural cause of course), nothing of note will be accomplished. I tend to side with the Jews, if only because the U.N. does not.

369 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:28:36pm

anonyrat:

If one agrees with the Palestinian point-of-view, are they automatically anti-semitic? I think not.

You think wrong. Baalestinian POV is anti-semitic by definition. They -- as a collective identity -- have no raison d'etre other than Jewish murder, no motivation other than Jew-hatred. They are, as Maine's Michael memorably put it, a genocidal weapon masquerading as a national movement.

Substitute "Palestinian" for "nazi" and ask yourself that question again.

370 kid charlemagne  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:29:12pm

Img #332: Very nicely stated.

a.k.a. Will #350: Are you being sarcastic?

371 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:29:55pm

#365 a.k.a. Will, true. I was responding more to slim's

This is a theme among blacks all the time.

a theme from slim rather than Kurian.

372 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:30:25pm

#366 - how so oh wise one?

#351 anonyrat, let me guess for the record; you weren't strong at problem solving in high school were you?
373 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:37pm

Our public school systems are disgrace. As are out public universities.

While I have put my kiddo into private school...I get back from the university gnashing my teeth daily.

I have a mind to bring a can of spray paint for the Guevera and Castro T-shirts. What a bunch of idiots. Then again, they're in the element they've grown accustomed to.

374 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:32:15pm

#368 anonyrat

Oh, this should be fun. Define

cause of zionism
375 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:59pm

out=our

Sorry...

376 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:35:41pm
so I am concluding this site is less USA conservative and slightly more interested in jewishness and zionism.

Then you would be very much mistaken. Let's try a bit of perspective.

1) The thread discusses remarks by a scholarship sttudent at Duke, in which he posited that only Jews would object to a supposed academic conference aimed at supporting the murder of civilians in a democratic country allied with the US, the ultimate dissolution of that country, and the exile, extermination or enslavement of its citizens.

2) The conference also posits that of all the ethnic groups in the world, only the Jews are inherently unworthy of ever having a state.

3) The writer tried to support his position with classic anti-Jewish complaints (too rich, too powerful, privileged) presented in leftist jargon (not a true minority, oppressive, wealthy). These complaints have little to do with the conference and lend no logical support to what the writer claims to be arguing -- i.e. that the conference is a good thing. After all, what does the position of American Jews in US society have to do with whether Israelis should be murdered?

4) The thread found its way to LGF because most of the Lizards here -- most of whom I surmise are not Jewish -- recognize that anti-Semitism is a warning sign of serious rot and danger in any democracy. Denial of anti-Semitism and casual acceptance of anti-Semitism are two others, as are widespread inability to present or understand a logical argument, acceptance of irrational conspiracy theories, and ignorance of history. These symptoms are the more troubling when they infect what should be the intellectual leadership of a country.

5) The links whose prevalence you seem to find objectionable are a side line to the thread. They were posted by a number of Lizards in response to a number of ill-informed postings about whether Jewishness is a religion, a race, an ethnicity, a candy mint or a breath mint. (Short answer: it is futile to try to fit Jewishness into non-Jewish concepts, just as it would be futile to argue what Christianity tastes like or how many hydrogen molecules it takes to make a strawberry shortcake into C sharp.)

Sorry if all this discussion of what it is to be Jewish confounds you. It is a rarity here, indulged in only when necessary to enlighten non-Jewish friends or to set trolls straight.

377 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:36:36pm

kid charlemagne #370

a.k.a. Will #350: Are you being sarcastic?

Yes.

378 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:22pm

grayp,

After the weekend posts ya' had me scared.

: (

My parents didn't give a rat's ass either whether I liked 'em or not. BTW My three are all in public schools. Older two are honor students, 1st grader too young to tell yet, but I digress. Thanks for keeping me honest.

379 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:38:35pm

351 anonyrat 10/19/2004 02:07PM PST

Someone smarter than me once wrote that "writing is Nature's way of showing us how disorganized our thinking is." I think annonyrat could be the proof of that notion.

He wrote, "In reading all of the posts here, maybe he has a point. Could it be that anything that is said that is not pro-Israel is automatically deemed anti-Semitic?"

Well of course not--even I could sympathize with the Palestinians a little, if they weren't hate-filled child-killers who wanted to see me dead--but what Kurian wrote was a prime example of ultra-fine, super-deluxe, modern liberal, Jew-hate. There was no agreement with anything. AND HE WASN'T WRITING ABOUT ISRAEL!!

Kurian was telling everyone why American Jews are whiny, sorry, over-privileged, under-useful bottom feeders whose very existence may not necessarily be a curse on America, but is surely an oozy zit. Seems plain enough to me.

Frankly, I think it's time for you to get a cluepon, or at least to read the article in question. And BTW, if you really think "pulling out most of the settlements and finishing the wall" will actually resolve the Israel/Palestinian problem, then you don't really understand the nature of the problem. You might want to check into that too.

- SangerM

380 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:40:28pm

#296

Does anyone doubt that Mr. Kurian got into Duke U based on Affirmative Action? I'm thinking it was not based on his analytical skills.

On the other hand, you would be amazed at the lack of writing skills on the part of many college applicants and students. They were probably so blown away at his ability to write a simple and compound English sentences that they never bothered to analyze the logic of his content.

381 may05  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:42:05pm

#5 Lune

What a reliable source?!! MEMRI? I watched the interview ... and take my words for granted: MEMRI have twisted the man's words!!

So, next time try to give a better source or diversify your sources...

382 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:08pm

SangerM,

"Someone smarter than me once wrote that "writing is Nature's way of showing us how disorganized our thinking is."

Dude, that's me.

383 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:33pm

#379 SangerM

AND HE WASN'T WRITING ABOUT ISRAEL!!


LOL! Sweetie, you might want to be a tad gentler when stating the obvious. Its head might explode!

384 Zack  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:40pm
It is well known that Jews constitute the most privileged “minority” group in this country.

Interesting. Sneer quotes around "minority" for a group that is less than 1% of the general population, a decimation achieved by having endured centuries of persecution, genocide, and forced conversion.

But what Jewish suffering—along with exorbitant Jewish privilege in the United States—amounts to is a stilted, one-dimensional conversation where Jews feel the overwhelming sense of entitlement not to be criticized or offended.

1. If American society would like to extend such alleged privileges, some would decline and some would accept. Unfortunately for those who would like to receive the phantom rewards, there are none - nor have there ever been any.

2. Any Jews who feel a "sense of entitlement not to be criticized or offended" must be bitterly disappointed, because what they get is mostly the opposite - criticism for having somehow survived the many genocide campaigns waged against them.

Kurian only offers a repetition of the same fallacious logic of genocide used to exterminate Jews down through the centuries. For a group already so reduced in size as to be almost nonexistant, and a country so small as to be almost invisible on a world map, what makes it worth all the trouble Mr Kurian and his fellow anti-Semites go through in their over-the-top blood libels and slanders? But then this isn't about reality and logic, is it?

385 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:47:13pm

bob with one o

if you are serious I offer the following, really not interested in a debate however.

There are two types of logic used in 'reasoning'

deductive: a general rule or therom that is not disproved by ANY specific examples.

inductive: specific examples which are gathered to make a broad or general assertion.

the first is non-subjective the second is inherently subjective.

This writer is using inductive reasoning to deduce a general assertion. He has a bias which is obvious to me but yet unrecognized or unrevealed by him. Therefore his argument fails. Non-the-less his argument is "reasoned". It is not his reasoning skills that make his argument fail it is his bias, prejuduce, envy or hate.

386 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:48:04pm

#268

This is a theme among blacks all the time.

I have about as much use for sentiments like that as I do with Kurian's dreck.

It's a theme among Black demagogues and race hustlers. It's a theme among people who play the politics of race. It's a theme among anti-Semites who happen to be Black, including those who emphasize their ethnicity as major theme in spewing their hatred.

But a theme among Blacks? As in THE Blacks/all Blacks/most Blacks? Gimme a break.

387 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:48:43pm
and take my words for granted

Not bloody likely. MEMRI is a respected and competent organization. You, on the other hand, is an annoying little pest.

388 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:50:20pm

grayp (#363):

You're welcome. Great poem and great insight, aren't they.

389 Pooh  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:54:46pm

#351 anonyrat

"What's the big deal? This clown has his opinion and is stating it. I don't see any Jew-bashing, just anger that his pet cause stirred up a hornets nest of those who disagree with him. If his artical was "I hate Jews, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able. I would also support others rights to disagree, boycot, demonstrate, against him and whoever gave him the soapbox."

You do not care and you do not see the blindingly obvious for one simple reason: you too are an anti-Semite. No doubt, seventy years ago, you'd have been cheering on Father Coughlin and telling the Jews to fight back if they were offended. You are the very worst of America. You hide behind the freedoms she offers in order to further your hatreds.

"If one agrees with the Palestinian point-of-view, are they automatically anti-semitic? I think not."

Those who demonise Israel; those who hold Israel to a higher standard than any other nation; those who utilise anti-Semitism in their fight about Israel; those who excuse the use of suicide bombers against Israel; those who wish, one way or another, to destroy Israel - all these people are anti-Semitic.

"Just for the record, I think the Israel/Palestinian problem can be resolved by pulling out most of the settlements and finishing the wall."

Then you are a fool as well as a bigot.

390 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:55:21pm

#368 anonyrat,

I guess my bigger point was that anyone that disagrees with Israel or the cause of zionism is branded an anti-semite regardless of their reasoning. There is no way to have intelligent discourse if certain positions are automatically off the table.
I guess my bigger point was that anyone that disagrees with Seminomadic Bands or the cause of environmentalism to preserve the rain forests is branded an anti-pygmyite regardless of their reasoning. There is a way to have ignorant discourse if uncertain positions are automatically on the table.
391 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:57:22pm

dustyroadguy,

I was serious in agreeing with you that "logic has no place in hate envy etc...perhaps "truth" would/ could have entered into my post but most of us here have already agreed to certain set premises and I would then stand accused of thread hijacking.

Your last paragraph was on the mark and was far more eloquent than I could have stated.

392 Luigi  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:59:52pm

Why do I not have to wonder who this kid is voting for?? The man is obviously a Kerry supporter.

393 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:59:53pm

382 Bob with one O 10/19/2004 02:46PM PST

Dude, that's me.

Me too, I thunk...

383 grayp 10/19/2004 02:46PM PST

LOL! Sweetie, you might want to be a tad gentler when stating the obvious. Its head might explode!

I know, and I agree--it just sort of came out that way, being so obvious and all... See what I mean about disorganized thinking? :-)

SangerM

394 Pooh  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:50pm

#368 anonyrat

"I guess my bigger point was that anyone that disagrees with Israel or the cause of zionism is branded an anti-semite regardless of their reasoning. There is no way to have intelligent discourse if certain positions are automatically off the table."

This is one of those "big lies" that is extremely popular with anti-Semites at present. The notion that anyone who disagrees with Israel is automatically branded as a Jew-hater flies in the face of all the known facts: that Jews in Israel and the Diaspora are the most self-critical people on earth. If you have any doubts check out the various newspapers in Israel and the Diaspora. As Zionism is the movement that brings fulfilment to the Jewish right to self-determination, anyone who disagrees with Zionism, on the other hand, is quite obviously an anti-Semite.

395 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:04:04pm

#351

Could it be that anything that is said that is not pro-israel is automatically deemed anti-semitic? If one agrees with the Palestinian point-of-view, are they automatically anti-semitic? I think not.

Let's see. His column is called "The Jews". The writes

It is well known that Jews constitute the most privileged “minority” group in this country. Among the top 10 universities, Jews enjoy shocking overrepresentation: Only the California Institute of Technology has an undergraduate Jewish population below 10 percent, and four schools have particularly stark Jewish advantages—Harvard (30 percent), Yale (23 percent), UPenn (31 percent) and Columbia (25 percent). Keep in mind that, at best estimate, no more than 3 percent of all Americans are Jewish.
396 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:04:41pm

#261 eschew-obfuscation

(Sigh) Yes, the Nazis were socialists too, just as much as the Communists. This is one of the reasons I don't really care if a movement is described as "Right Wing", or "Left Wing", since, essentially they're both the same; hating individuals, and longing for an all-powerful government run by Stalin/Hitler, to whip the people into line.

And the Nazis certainly weren't "conservative"! Among other things, they despised reason, religion (except for the weird paganism they cooked up), and believed a person's race, not his individual character, was the most important thing about him.

Read Peter Verkooijen's post #189; he describes the whole Nazi/Socialist thing better than I ever could!

397 vyaduck  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:06:24pm

my be Mr.. Kur(i)an thinks he is at David Duke university,
or is this just indicative of North Carolina mind set, does anyone know where John Edwards is ?

398 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:07:52pm

387 Q 10/19/2004 02:48PM PST

You wrote: "organization. You, on the other hand, is an annoying little pest. "

It should be, ARE an annoying little pest, not is.

Trust me. I checked in Strunk and White: second person, singular (though it could also be used for a plural you). Is goes with third person, singular (but not plural).

Unless of course, you meant your other hand is an annoying little pest, in which case the problem is with punctuation, not conjugation.

-SangerM

399 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:11:25pm
It should be, ARE an annoying little pest, not is.

Yeah, you ARE right. ESL caught up with me.

400 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:05pm

vyaduck,

"does anyone know where John Edwards is ? "

1. Over there, on the left.

2. In schmuppie's arms

Sorry, couldn't resist.

401 Yankev  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:12pm

#384

Kurian only offers a repetition of the same fallacious logic of genocide used to exterminate Jews down through the centuries.

Shamson Rafael Hirsch traces it all the way to the Phillistines' complaint against Yitzhak.Bereshis (Genesis 26:16) "Go away from us. You have become more powerful than us." [Eng. translation per The Living Torah.] Hirsch z'l points out that the Hebrew can also be translated "You have become powerful FROM us" -- i.e. all your success came from taking advantage of us. Writing in 19th Century Germany, he had the benefit of a lot of history to look back on, in nation after nation.

402 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:13:05pm

#396 TalkinKamel


NAZI = national SOCIALIST workers party.

403 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:13:46pm

And you can't say "national socialism" without saying "socialism".

404 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:14:43pm

399 Q 10/19/2004 03:11PM PST

Yeah, you ARE right. ESL caught up with me.

Oh, Sorry. I didn't realize you were Canadian...

:-)

405 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:15:33pm

#400 Bob with one O, it's hard to track John Edwards now that he has a portable mirror.

406 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:19:40pm

#379 SangerM

Is it true that all Jews have big noses? Is it also true that all Jews can't be trusted when it comes to money?

Is it also true that all palestinians want to kill all the jews?

/sterotype off

even I could sympathize with the Palestinians a little, if they weren't hate-filled child-killers who wanted to see me dead

You really missed my point, but on to a different one.

I find it hard to believe that there are no palestinians who would like to settle the conflict in a peaceful fashion by having a palestinian state that co-exists with Israel. Surely there are those who have the same desires and aspirations that most "normal" people have. Surely there are those who have a modicum of intelligence and are not brain-washed by the nonsense found in their religion.

Just as surely, there are those who want to kill as many Jews as they can in support of their belief that they can somehow succeed in "driving the Jews into the sea" and that this is good and god-pleasing.

My personal opinion is that by removing most of the disputed settlements and by increasing security (a wall provides additional security), the problem is more easily managed until the Palestinians come to their senses.

Being secular, I support Israel as one of our strongest allies. I have very little compassion for the palestinians given the support (ranging from strong to tacit) for the tactics of hamas et al.

For what it's worth - the author of the article that started this thread would hate me too. I'm white, wealthy, and run a public corporation. I have no religous affiliation because they are all man-made crap.

407 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:20:04pm

#401 Yankev

Well, not just your #401. I just want you to know how much I value all your posts. I've learned alot. Thank you.

408 lmg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:20:53pm

#350:

Now you know all IQ tests, college entrance exams, and tests in general are culturally biased.

Yes, and Reality is the mother of all tests.

409 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:22:36pm

#406 anonyrat

Even Sami al-Soud, who is the nearest thing to a non-antisemitic Balestinian one can find, acknowledges a Balestinian state means the destruction of Israel. See, not all Balis are liars...

410 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:22:42pm

Roger,

The many faces of John Edwards?

411 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:23:17pm

He shoots - he scores!

You do not care and you do not see the blindingly obvious for one simple reason: you too are an anti-Semite.
412 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:25:10pm

#408 lmg

That's the point: reality is culturally biased :-)

413 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:26:05pm

#406 anonyrat,

I find it hard to believe that there are no palestinians who would like to settle the conflict in a peaceful fashion by having a palestinian state that co-exists with Israel. Surely there are those who have the same desires and aspirations that most "normal" people have. Surely there are those who have a modicum of intelligence and are not brain-washed by the nonsense found in their religion.

Yes. They are called Israeli collaborators and are often murdered by the Palistinians in power.

414 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:26:10pm

#406 anonyrat

Unfortunately, I think it's going to be hard for the Palestinians to come to their senses, or feel safe enough to express their longings for peace, (those of them that do want peace) as long as Yassir Arafat is alive, and getting the big bucks from the US and from Europe to prop up his criminal empire.

And, even if he does kick the bucket soon (one can always hope), there's probably a whole line of wannabe-be successors, hoping to take his place.

The PLO is the worst thing that ever happened to the Palestinian people.

415 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:27:36pm

#414 TalkinKamel

There is no such thing as a Balestinian beoble.

416 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:29:31pm

386 Yankev 10/19/2004 02:48PM PST

But a theme among Blacks? As in THE Blacks/all Blacks/most Blacks? Gimme a break.
**
I agree completely with what you wrote.

At the same time, I have to admit that I am often baffled by seemingly successful Blacks who are also vocal Jew haters. Is it for the spot-light and the instant audience? Do these folks actually feel Jews are responsible for the plight of poor Blacks in America? Do they think Jews took something from American society that would otherwise have accrued to them? Whatever the cause, it sure seems to resonate with some of the Black population.

For my part, I always felt Jews and Blacks had a lot in common, but that was when I was young. These days, it just feels like a lot of people want to blame someone else for their troubles and Jews are convenient targets.

Does that make any sense?

-SangerM

417 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:42:06pm

Mr Pol,

Forgive me but the appropriate term would be fait accompli? Sadly, the lie has been repeated often enough (the people believe).

418 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:42:34pm

SangerM

You infer that all palestinians want to kill you (hence why you can't bring yourself to show even a "little" sympathy) and then agree "completely" with a post that not all blacks are anti-semites?

Someone smarter than me once wrote that "writing is Nature's way of showing us how disorganized our thinking is." I think annonyrat could be the proof of that notion.
419 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:48:05pm

#417 Bob with one O

Yeah, I know... even Israelis are now believe that shit. A quick look at a map of the Middle East should be enough for anybody to see the truth, but... I dunno. My personal theory is that the total amount of intelligence available is a constant, and world population has increased.

420 heyniceboard  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:50:57pm
Now you know all IQ tests, college entrance exams, and tests in general are culturally biased.

It's funny how Asians never seem to complain about the Verbal sections, as it would seem to be VERY biased against them (large portions of Asian-Americans speak English as a second language). Other than the Indians/Pakistanis, Asian languages are not at all related to the Indo-European language family (anyone here took Chinese or Japanese in college?); one could argue that this would certainly affect how they think out and interpret a passage.

421 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:52:23pm

Mr Pol,

LOL And they're breathing perfectly good air we may someday need. My friend if you ever make it to Colorado, well, drinks are on me. At DIA of course!

: )

422 lmg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:52:52pm

#406:

... until the Palestinians come to their senses.

Scientists predict that may ocur some time after protons decay but before all the supermassive black holes evaporate, right?

423 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:54:07pm

406 anonyrat 10/19/2004 03:19PM PST

> "Is it true that all Jews have big noses? Is it also true that all Jews can't be trusted when it comes to money?"

You cannot possibly imagine how many times I have heard people say just these things around me because I don't have a big nose, and because my name doesn't sound "Kike."

But I digress.

> Is it also true that all Palestinians want to kill all the Jews?

Not at all.

However, they support their government (or what passes for it), which does. They support the HAMAS, the PLO, and other organizations, and most important, (as a so-called nation of people) they have not risen up to say STOP, or to call for a halt to the violence. Even the nutcase liberals in America will take a stand. It may be for a dumb issue, but damned if they don't get out there and protest!

More to the point, when the Palestinians started the Intifada, they were as close to a State as anyone could ever have imagined. But that wasn't enough. Why? Because they hate Israel and they want it, and Jews, destroyed. All Palestinians? Of course not, but those who don't want it don't count for beans since they are both silent and powerless.

If you think those who do not want Jews dead are in the minority, you might want to visit some of the other links here on LGF, like the car swarm pics or the child-hate links.

>You really missed my point.

Well that may be true, but you missed mine, and you made it at the same time. You clearly hadn't read the article, or you misunderstood it. Or, you choose to take the discussion in another direction, but you did so by accusing people of being intolerant and ignorant. I try to be neither, or at least not more of the second than the first, but I am clear on one thing:

The Palestinians are my enemy. All of them? Hardly, but since I can't tell them apart, I just assume I need to worry about all of them, at least until I see some group of them stake a claim to sanity and decency by, say, denouncing terrorism and child killing as a legitimate means of protest, for example.

And as for Kurian. He may also hate you for being "white, wealthy, and running a public corporation" but he didn't say so, and I bet he never would. Why? Because he is trying to separate non-Jews from Jews; because Jews are acceptable targets these days; and because ultimately, he wants you to hire him and donate to his cause, or at least to let him hold an Anti-Israeli Conference on the campus of your alma mater.

Of course, I don't mean you specifically, but people within your demographic.

- SangerM

424 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:57:58pm

#422

Scientists predict that may ocur some time after protons decay but before all the supermassive black holes evaporate, right?

I'm afraid you may be correct sir. However, I tend to be an optimist and have this fanciful idea that evolution will eliminate the insecurity in humans that breeds religion.

425 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:58:29pm

#423 SangerM

You cannot possibly imagine how many times I have heard people say just these things around me because I don't have a big nose, and because my name doesn't sound "Kike."

Having a Polish-sounding last name and not looking like the stereotypical Jew, I know exactly what you mean. Funny how most Jew-haters assume Poles must hate Jews...

426 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:04:52pm

418 anonyrat 10/19/2004 03:42PM PST

You infer that all Palestinians want to kill you (hence why you can't bring yourself to show even a "little" sympathy) and then agree "completely" with a post that not all blacks are anti-Semites?

Well yeah, actually, because I know not all blacks are anti-Semites, but I'm not sure about any Palestinian. I'd just have to take someone's word for them not wanting to kill me, and frankly, their record just ain't too encouraging. Know what I mean?

Frankly, I'd feel safer walking around with a Star of David on my arm almost anywhere in America than I would doing the same thing anywhere in the Palestinian territories. I might get my ass kicked by some folks for being a well-off looking white guy stupid enough to go where he shouldn't, but that wouldn't be because I am Jewish.

Nice try.

But since we're discoursing, let me ask you. Have you ever said to anyone else "Some of my best friends are Jewish?"

:-D

427 zygazint  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:05:03pm

Scapegoat

The scapegoat apparently was a goat that was driven off into the wilderness as part of the ceremonies of Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, in Judaism. The rite is described in Leviticus 16.

Two male goats were to be brought to the place of sacrifice along with a bull. The high priest then cast lots for the two goats. One goat was offered as a burnt offering, as was the bull. The second goat was the scapegoat. The high priest placed his hands on the head of the goat and confessed the sins of the people of Israel. The goat was then led away into the wilderness, bearing the sins of the people with it, to be claimed by the fallen angel Azazel.

In Christian theology, the story of the scapegoat in Leviticus is interpreted as a symbolic prefiguation of the self-sacrifice of Jesus, who takes the sins of humanity on his own head, having been driven into the 'wilderness' outside the city by order of the high priests.

Figuratively, a scapegoat is someone selected arbitrarily to bear blame for a calamity. Scapegoating is the act of irrationally holding a person, group of people, or thing responsible for a multitude of problems.

Scapegoating is an important tool of propaganda. For example, in Nazi Germany the Jews were singled out as the source of Germany's economic woes and political collapse.

Scapegoating is often more devastating when applied to a minority group, as they will by definition be in the minority, and thus find it difficult to defend themselves. A tactic often employed is to characterize an entire group of individuals according to the unethical or immoral conduct of a small number of individuals belonging to the group.

Some other common "scapegoated" groups of individuals throughout history have been blacks, immigrants, Communists, Capitalists, "witches", women, white men, the poor, the rich, the Jews, Gays and gypsies.

In industrialized societies, scapegoating of traditional minority groups is increasingly frowned upon. In the extreme, this may result in socially enforced rules regarding speech, as in political correctness.

Scapegoating may be applied to organizations. For example, corporations or governments are seen by some as responsible for an exaggerated multitude of social problems. Political correctness may be a contributing factor in the development of such beliefs regarding corporations, particularly where a highly developed sense of tolerance towards traditional minority groups clashes with a continued (and some would say unjustified) need to lay blame.

Compare: moral panic; hue and cry; witchhunt

428 lmg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:09:19pm
I'm afraid you may be correct sir. However, I tend to be an optimist and have this fanciful idea that evolution will eliminate the insecurity in humans that breeds religion.

Perhaps. But we have introduced some very anti-Darwinian policies into our societies that are turning demographics, if not evolution, in an unfavorable direction. Humans have probably been frustrating evolution for a very long time, though. Our hope may lie in our own future biotechnology, or in a favorable chance mutation, like the one that may have given humans speech some 200,000 years ago and started our final migration out of Africa.

429 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:09:46pm

#351 anonyrat

If his artical was "I hate Jews, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
If his artical was "I hate Blacks, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
If his artical was "I hate Asians, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
If his artical was "I hate Indians, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
If his artical was "I hate Mexicans, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
If his artical was "I hate Arabs, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.

You're quite the supportive person. Kudos to you.

430 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:10:47pm

SangerM

I like you and appreciate your views. I could spend the next 10 minutes responding directly to your last post, but alas, I have neither the time nor inclination. I will close with this?

I am not a Jew and therefore cannot fully see from your perspective.

It is obvious that Kurian would dislike me immensely (did I mention I'm a republican too?) given the contents of his article and argument that people are defined by the group(s) with which they belong (a muslim innuit lesbian vegetarian would rank very high to him). It would be obvious to him that since I am white, wealthy, etc., that I don't "deserve" anything and should be spat upon.

Let's hope that in our lifetime that some sanity prevails in the middle east.

431 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:14:29pm

#426 SangerM

But since we're discoursing, let me ask you. Have you ever said to anyone else "Some of my best friends are Jewish?"

No, but some of my employees are jewish. I guess I consider them friends. What's the point?

By the way, I'm polish, so my theory is that I can pick on anyone I want to. Know any good pollack jokes?

432 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:16:11pm

425 Mr Pol 10/19/2004 03:58PM PST
#423 SangerM

> Funny how most Jew-haters assume Poles must hate Jews...

Or how many whites think being white qualifies you as a person who hates blacks...

Or...

Well, you know what I mean.

The real issue is whether one allows them the delusions or corrects them. I used to be silent. I am not any longer. If people want to spout their biases, I just figure they have the right to hear that I'm not one of them.

Just sucks the air right out of a conversation that has gotten unpleasant... :-)

433 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:17:50pm

#429 Roger

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes. You forgot homosexuals though.

I like my bigots to be known so I can make decisions accordingly. I have lost many friends due to racist jokes. I don't tell racist jokes, so you figure it out.

434 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:19:15pm

Ahhh, one more for #351:

If his artical was "I hate Poles, and here's why...", I would still support his right to publish this wherever he is able.
435 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:24:38pm

#432 SangerM

The real issue is whether one allows them the delusions or corrects them.

That mostly depends on the kind of environment... and on the amount of force require to correct those delusions.

436 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:26:59pm

430 anonyrat 10/19/2004 04:10PM PST
431 anonyrat 10/19/2004 04:14PM PST

> Let's hope that in our lifetime that some sanity prevails in the middle east.

It could happen. We saw the end of the cold war, and the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, so it might happen. I won't hold my breath, but I'm willing to hope.

> What's the point?

Just a smart-assed question. I have heard that too many times, usually from people who didn't really understand why that was not a good thing to say. Sorry.

> Know any good pollack jokes?

Lots, but to be honest I stopped telling ethnic jokes about 15 years ago. I love them, but the fact is they promote stereotypes and make life harder for the butt of the jokes. If you think otherwise, try telling Pollock or Jew or Italian or Scots jokes with different ethnicities. People don't laugh because the stereotype doesn't work and isn't known. There's lots more reason I don't but I am being called to watch a movie, and it's family time.

G'night, take care.

- SangerM

438 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:27:31pm

#298 Morgan
#320 Jonny

The sad reality is that many Jewish students go off to college hoping to make friends of all races, religions and nationalities, but are subject to such hatred from Muslims and "undrerepresented minorites" that they leave college bitter, angry and more than a little bigoted. I know that was my experience, as well as the experience of many of my Jewish friends.

You're fcuking kidding me. That's disgusting. If I may ask, how old are you, and where in the world did you go to school?

439 Timbre  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:28:31pm

Jews "enjoy shocking overrepresentation," Philip? Just in college? Perhaps you think Jews are overrepresented on Planet Earth? Perhaps you wish to reduce Jewish numbers? Why don't you try to start the Reduction with me, Jackass?

440 Blackhorse  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:28:43pm

#406 anonyrat


"I have no religous affiliation because they are all man-made crap."


You have just reached the level of Philip Kurian.

441 LRFD  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:29:12pm

You know, it's wack-jobs like this who run or write for almost all of the major college newspapers in this country. What amazes me is just how subconscious this entire thing is among the higher-ups. They preach and rave and navel gaze on the subject of racism, but are perfectly willing to allow, nay condone actual racism against Jews.

That's my two cents on the subject.

442 transferthem  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:35:29pm

G'Day!! I'm new here at Duke. Can someone please direct me to the 1930's Faculty of Genocide?

443 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:45:14pm

#440 Blackhorse

"I have no religous affiliation because they are all man-made crap."
You have just reached the level of Philip Kurian.

How true. We both have an opinion and have expressed it in writing to the consternation of some that read it.

Atheists are the really the most hated of minorities. Our very existence threatens thousands of years of folklore and superstition. My god, just think what would happen if one of them talked to your children!

444 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:47:33pm

#443 anonyrat

Atheism does not mean you have to insult everybody else's faith. Try leaving other people beliefs alone. You might not be less hated, but at least you'll stop pissing me off.

445 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:50:23pm

#329 yellowroseoftexas

At one time I was really shocked whenever I read about Christians and church groups supporting the Palestinian cause considering the fact that so many Palestinians supported terrorism.Now I am not really surprised at anything the liberal Christians do anymore.I really think most of them are really antisemitic.There is no other way to describe people who constantly condemn Israel any and every chance they get and yet never criticize the poor Palestinians even when they see the brutal murder of a pregnant Jewish women and her children as a legitimate act of resistance ...

Actually, I think that you're wrong that these people must be antisemitic.

Lemme give ya a ferinstance: my mom. Okay, she's not a liberal Christian, she's a new age pagan moonbat, but she's got the same thing going on, what with the sympathyzing with the poor oppressed Palestinian terrorists in their quest to commit genocide.

And she's not antisemitic in the slightest. She's got loads of Jewish friends, and has dated a whole slew of Jews (well, a few, anyway - I'm not trying to make my mom sound like a tramp here ...).

Everything she knows about why Israel is wrong, she learned in the 60's from her liberal Jewish friend. Even in the light of all the Palestinian atrocities (kept as well glossed over as possible by the MSM, of course), she hasn't seen fit to revisit her position on this issue.

Plus she's a farking moonbat. When I confronted her with the fact that there's an absolutely HUGE peace movement in Israel, and absolutely NONE in Palestine, she right then and there - without any evidence, of course - decided that, well, they MUST exist, they're just keeping vewy, vewy quiet.

I told her that they'd better be, or they'd be killed for being Zionist sympathyzers.

Nonetheless, she's perfectly content to believe that the people of both sides of the conflict, deep down, all really want the same thing: peace. She's completely deluded. I think that the concept that Muslim/Arab culture in general - and Palestinian culture in particular - is so antisemitic that it precludes any peaceful solution to this problem, conflicts too extremely with her peace-and-love worldview for her to accept.

There, that's my story. My not antisemitic, yet dedicatedly anti-Israel mom. I'm telling you, they're out there. I'm willing to bet that the misguided Christians you're talking about follow the same pattern.

446 agentd  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:57:44pm

I realize this is slightly off-topic, but I'm doing a research paper on US-Israel relations during the cold war. I have a bunch of books, but they're all anti-Israeli. I know of some pro-Israel books, but does anyone know any pro-Israel books that have information on that specific topic (US-Israel relations during the Cold War)?

447 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:01:25pm

#444 MrPol

I'm sorry you took my opinion (religion = crap) so personally. I shall rephrase:

"I have no religous affiliation because, in my humble opinion, and not to be constured as an attack on anyone's individual faith and belief system, they are all man-made crap."

I don't know what religion you espouse, but assuming you are a christian, don't you think that islam is crap? What about scientology (as if that were even a religion)? What about the moonies? Surely they are following a "crap" religion.

My only failing is that I express my opinion a little more freely than most. Personally, I respect anyone's religous beliefs, provided that they do not inflict them on me or mine.

Naturally, I have a BIG problem with the jihadists. The koran seldom mentions atheists because I assume it was thought that everyone was either a muslim, a "people of the book" or a polytheist. I'm sure us atheists wouldn't fair very well under sharia law though.

448 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:09:28pm

#447 anonyrat

I'm Jewish, not religious.. I wouldn't care either way about Islam if it wasn't violent and preaching genocide. And there's a difference between freely expressing an opinion and being offensive.

449 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:09:33pm
I have no religous affiliation because they are all man-made crap.

Man-made? Absolutely.

Crap? Go and study the Torah, young one; it may make you a better atheist.

As I commented in the Johnny Cash thread:

I think [meme theory] is one of the all-time most brilliant scientific metaphors ever, and it breaks my heart that the originator, Richard Dawkins, can't apply his own idea in a positive way to Judeo-Christian thought.

Because not only does the meme concept provide an excellent framework for understanding the endurance of phenomena like Islamofascism and Bush Derangement Syndrome, but for me it provides a comfortable way to explore Judaism and re-visit Christianity even though I'm personally an atheist. I view religious belief systems as akin to genomes, and I can go in and extract beneficial memes to be spliced into my own worldview, without taking all the potentially harmful baggage of traditional religion.

The atheist who says "the Bible has nothing to teach me because there is no Supreme Being and the miracle-stories are lies made up by men" is as big a fool as the guy who says "I have nothing to learn from Aesop's Fables because everyone knows that tortoises and ants can't actually talk."

450 Blackhorse  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:09:34pm

#444 Mr. Pol


Thank you Mr. Pol


Blackhorse

451 Morgan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:19:44pm

438 Lewis

"You're fcuking kidding me. That's disgusting. If I may ask, how old are you, and where in the world did you go to school?"

I'm 34 and went to Cornell. There, as in many other schools, the Black students segregated themselves, the Muslim students ranted about Israel and Jews and the "progressive" students made demonizing war against the Jewish state the focus of their college lives.

But its not just me - you will find that almost half of all Jews in their 20's and 30's are Republicans, as opposed to less than 20% of Jews in their 60's and 70's. Much of the reason for this shift has to do woth the fact that Jews on college campuses are the target of the type of bigotry you read in the Duke Chronicle. And all of this hate comes from the left, much of it frem blacks - read the link below and learn something.


[Link: www.adl.org...]

452 anonyrat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:23:15pm

I stand by my opinion, however flippantly stated. I have studied many religions, probably moreso that many of the adherents of those religions. Religion has always fascinated me. True, I summed up my opinion as 'man-made crap' for brevity, but I stand by it nonetheless.

Why is it that so many can freely espouse their opinions, most of the time stated as fact, but when it comes to religion, it is taboo? For example, it is perfectly fine to insult the "farking moonbats" to no end on this blog, which any liberal would find offensive to the extreme, but when I state my opinion that "religion is crap", it somehow transcends the mores of acceptable discourse? Any deep held belief appears to be fair game, but religion is out of bounds?

453 Victor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:24:30pm

#376 Yankev  10/19/2004 02:35PM PST

Well said.

454 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:27:08pm

#452 anonyrat

It's like that... no discussion about abortion, no racism, no bigotry, no Judenhass and no homophobia. Discussions about religion/atheism should remain polite, too. If you don't like Charles' rules, you don't have to post here.

455 mich-again  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:21:33pm

Oh I so love the smug intelligence of the atheists.

Atheists are smarter than "religious" people because they know how it all happened eons ago and it sure wasn't like the book of Genesis. Nope, the primordial soup was struck by lightning and ..tadah!.. one-celled creatures appeared. Then through millions of years of evolution, the one celled creatures eventually became...us. HUH??

Mind you, I do believe generally in evolution, and in all things scientific But even the staunchest atheist has to admit that they have no idea how the chemicals came alive. And without that, how can you continue building a scientific theory?

I don't have the blind faith it takes to be an atheist. I think God started this whole mess.

456 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:22:46pm
but when I state my opinion that "religion is crap", it somehow transcends the mores of acceptable discourse?

Either I wasn't clear enough, or you're being deliberately whiny. Let me make it plain: I wasn't accusing you of being mean to religious believers; I was accusing you of being an intellectual sluggard who's too lazy to examine religions and find that there's often considerable wisdom there -- accumulated human wisdom, not infallible divine wisdom, but wisdom nonetheless.

Not all traditional religions have wisdom in the same proportions, however. Judaism and Islam provide the starkest possible contrast, and one needn't assume the intervention of G-d or Satan to understand why Jews have made such outstanding contributions to philosophy, to science, to philanthropy, while Muslims, for almost all of their history, have excelled only by pillaging and scavenging the creativity of other cultures. The key difference is that Judaism constantly encourages debate and argument and self-examination and skeptical scrutiny of tradition, while Islam declared itself complete and perfect early on, slammed the door on debate, and has been a stagnant intellectual swamp ever since.

I used Judaism and Islam as examples, but the wise atheist should recognize that other religious traditions as well have wisdom mixed in with the supernatural claptrap. As an atheist, you're free to take the wisdom and discard the hocus-pocus. But you're a fool if you throw away the wisdom because you disdain the miracle stories.

So when you say "religion is crap," you aren't crossing the bounds of acceptable discourse; you're crossing the bounds of intelligent discourse.

Or, more bluntly, you're not being TOO RUDE; you're being TOO STUPID.

P.S. But I will pray for your enlightenment...

457 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:27:00pm

#415 Mr. Pol

True. Historically, there never was a Moslem group in the Holy Land that defined itself as being distinctly "Palestinian." What's now the Holy Land was once part of the Ottoman Empire.

However, for the Moslems of the Holy Land, who, under saner circumstances, would have become Jordanians, or Israeli citizens after the founding of Israel, Yassir Arafat, the myth of "Palestine", and "Palestinian Right of Return" have been disasters. They should have been re-settled, somewhere, long ago. Arafat should never have been allowed to set up a thugocracy over them, in his quest for power. And, if the country he was fighting against was anything other than a Jewish state, he would have been condemned for this long ago.

458 Nannette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:27:50pm

anonyrat,

If there were no religion, man would invent religion, after all, it's been around for tens of thousands of years... long before monotheism was practiced!

459 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:29:06pm

#451 Morgan

I'm (somewhat) flabbergasted.

My wife's a Cornell dropout, the same age as you; maybe I'll ask her take on the social scene there. She's not Jewish, though (well, genetically, she's 1/4 Jewish through her maternal grandfather, but ...)

You shoulda oughta come to the U of C what like I did. I suppose the black students somewhat self-segragated (all 2.5% of the student body of them), but there was none of this antisemitic bullshiat (well, maybe I'll have to confirm that with my former roommate ...), and there were barely any Arab students.

I didn't think my college social environment was particularly notable, save for being filled to the brim with hyperintelligent misfits sorely lacking in social skills (me among them), and being politcally largely apathetic - there weren't any of these stupid moonbat protests there then that I seem to hear about all the time now.

460 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:32:07pm

anonyrat

Shut up and listen to Throbert. You're making us atheists look bad.

461 Nannette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:33:31pm

For all of you who claim to be atheists... can any of you prove unequivocally that there is no God, or Creator???

462 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:37:29pm

#461 Nannette

Please... let's not go through that again... It's the kind of discussion that makes me long for Mr Holland's Opus.

463 bojado71  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:43:38pm

Not sure if it has been noted yet, but Kurian was awarded the Benjamin N. Duke Scholarship which pays for his entire education.

He was also given the 2004 Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation award.
The Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation awards scholarships of $2,000 for senior-year study and up to $26,000 for graduate studies to students who plan to pursue careers in government or public service. In addition, Truman scholars receive leadership development training and internship opportunities in the federal government.

And finally he was the 2003-04 recipient of the Melcher Family Award for Excellence in Journalism.
Duke alumnus Richard Melcher (could he be a jew???), a former Business Week writer and editor, established the Melcher Award in 2003.

I have become so fed up with this blatant hypocrisy of anti-semitism in the academic world that I have written to leaders of both the Benjamin N. Duke Scholarship and Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation to ask them point blank if they would still have given the awards to Kurian after reading his column. I am also asking if they will be taking back the awards as I am sure they do not want to be known as rewarding racists. Below is the letter I wrote to the Benjamin N. Duke Scholarship. I will paste in my next posting the letter I wrote to the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation. Please feel free to also write these folks as well as others and let them know how you feel.

Subject: Philip Kurian: The Jews Student Newspaper Article
To: info@bnduke.org
CC: washington-dc@adl.org


To Catherine Dhongade,
Please also note that I have copied the Anti-Defamation League on this message as I want them to know how Duke University not only allows an anti-semite to spew hatred, but also gives him a four year, fully paid scholorship. I am of course referring to Phillip Kurian and his piece in the Duke student newspaper called "The Jews" which can be accessed at the following link: [Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...]

I would like to know how you justify continuing to subsidize the education of a student who writes such vile and racist thoughts? Is there any movement to take back his scholorship due to his racist views not being shared by your organization? I am sure if he had written a similiar article on African-Americans you would have pulled his scholarship.

Because I have no hope that you have the courage to truly combat racism, myself and others will now take it upon ourselves to communicate to prominent Duke alumni how you are fully paying for the entire education of this hatemonger. I am sure that you subsist on donations, so I will also be sending this to prominent Jewish politicians as well as prominent publications to let them know that the Benjamin N. Duke Scholarship is being given to students who write columns using the most blatant stereotypes as well as using "facts" with no references to back up a hate filled article. As you will surely defend Mr Kurian as excercising his free speech, so will I. The only way we will be able to stop the growing anti-semitism on your campus is to let people know of its existence. There is no better way of doing this that to send a link of Mr Kurian's article as well as a little info on who is paying for his education. This note to you is meant to at least give you the opportunity to express whether you agree with his column and if you plan on taking any action with regards to continuing to pay thousands of dollars for his education.

I would appreciate a response that indicates specifically whether you are offended by his column or not, and also if you still feel he deserves the scholarship after having read it? Also, if had you read it before offering him the scholarship, would you have still given it to him? Please note that if you do not respond, I will also include your lack of communication on this very important subject in all communications I sent out regarding this horrible incident.

Thank you

Gary

464 bojado71  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:45:10pm

Here is the letter I wrote to Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation. I will post here any replies that I receive. They should be good for a laugh.

Subject: Phillip Kurian - Duke student newspaper article: "The Jews"
To: lblair@truman.gov
CC: washington-dc@adl.org


To Louis Blair,

Please also note that I have copied the Anti-Defamation League on this message as I want them to know how the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation awards scholarships to an anti-semite who spews hatred. I am of course referring to Phillip Kurian and his piece in the Duke student newspaper called "The Jews" which can be accessed at the following link: [Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...]

I would like to know how you justify selecting a racist as a 2004 national winner of the Truman Scholarship, which recognizes academic accomplishments, leadership potential and commitment to a career in public service. Please read the attached link and let me know if you find his comments offensive? Is there any movement to take back his award due to his racist views not being shared by your organization? I am sure if he had written a similiar article on African-Americans you would have pulled his scholarship.

Because I have no hope that you have the courage to truly combat racism, myself and others will now take it upon ourselves to communicate to prominent politicians as well as prominent publications to let them know that the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation award is being given to students who write columns using the most blatant stereotypes as well as using "facts" with no references to back up a hate filled article. As you will surely defend Mr Kurian as excercising his free speech, so will I. The only way we will be able to stop growing anti-semitism is to let people know of its existence. There is no better way of doing this that to send a link of Mr Kurian's article as well as a little info on who is giving him awards. This note to you is meant to at least give you the opportunity to express whether you agree with his column and if you plan on taking any action with regards to continuing to pay thousands of dollars for his education.

I would appreciate a response that indicates specifically whether you are offended by his column or not, and also if you still feel he deserves the award after having read it? Also, if had you read it before giving him the award, would you have still given it to him? Please note that if you do not respond, I will also include your lack of communication on this very important subject in all communications I sent out regarding this horrible incident.

I noted that in writing about the Characteristics of Successful Truman Scholarship Finalists, you state the below:

Sophistication on the issues: The candidate realizes that there are few clear-cut answers and solutions, that there are problems and obstacles, that our political system rarely moves ahead full-speed--and for good reasons. Just saying that something should be this way or that way is rarely enough.

Do you still feel that Mr Kurian posesses this sophistication needed for your award?

Thank you

Gary

465 Nannette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:46:42pm

#462 Mr Pol

Please... let's not go through that again... It's the kind of discussion that makes me long for Mr Holland's Opus.

Sorry I mentioned it... I've been through that discussion so many times before... I have a mental block so just forgot what the results are like... :-)

466 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:46:45pm

#437 Nanette

RE: Presbyterian Delegation Meets with Hizbollah

So sad isn't it ?

More than likely you will see a Legal Cat Fight Royal in the Presbyterian Church before anything like this is tried with "South Africa Style" dis-investment.

The "Christian in name only Moonbats" running this stuff have control of some Church Machinery, but the Gay/Lesbian ordination battle is likely to split the Presbyterians very soon just like the Anglicans/Episcopalians. The moonbats don't generate enough funds to pursue their pet social causes and the conservative congregations are getting ready to pull out.

You will probably see ERISA lawsuits over pastor's pension funds before they could pull off this kind of dis-investment battle. I'd be delighted to get one started and hold the Trustee's Fiduciarily liable personally to their last red cent.

A very nice legal battle is already underway in Orange County CA with the Episcopal Bishop of L.A. over pulling out of the Episcopal Church and leaving with their property and Pastor's Pensions. "Three Churches have broken away and are now under the "Bishops of Uganda" of all things. (Is this a great country or what)

There are plenty of conservative Presbyterians who say to the -- Social do-gooder "Christian in name only" moonbats, ---"Oh yeah ? ... Bring it on baby"

467 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:49:57pm

456 Throbert McGee

Throbert, that was truly inspired.

I think there was something there that we all need to either learn or be reminded of.

468 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:53:33pm

#461 Nannette

For all of you who claim to be atheists... can any of you prove unequivocally that there is no God, or Creator???

Begging Mr Pol's forgiveness, I'd like to say that there are quite a lot of things which I can't prove unequivocally, and yet, somehow, manage to take a firm position of belief on.

I can't actually prove that the sun will rise tomorrow. However, if someone were to come and ask me whether or not the sun would rise tomorrow, I would not claim to be undecided on the matter.

I do recognize that there's the possibility that I may be wrong about the existence of a supreme being. I don't think that automatically makes me an agnostic, though.

469 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:54:26pm

#463 bojado71

I think you've hit upon the ideal way to close these assholes down.

Dry up their funding.


May I suggest you copy Kurian on your correspondance?

If nothing else, the anxiety of potentially losing his funding may keep his mind occupied with his studies rather than his hatreds . . .

470 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:55:44pm

Lewis,

I think I dated your mother.

Say Hi for me.

471 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:58:48pm
But even the staunchest atheist has to admit that they have no idea how the chemicals came alive.

OT: I highly recommend Larry Gonick's Cartoon History of the Universe Vol. 1 as a holiday gift. It's subtitled "From the Big Bang to Alexander the Great," and covers the current theories on abiogenesis (well, current as of 1990) as well as the histories of Middle Eastern peoples that the Bible records with varying degrees of accuracy. It is NOT for religious believers who think that "myth" is a dirty word and who insist that Scripture must reflect history in a direct, literal way. But if you're open to the idea that the Bible's "history" consists of embellished, poeticized accounts of actual events, then Gonick's work is a treasure, because he explains in concise cartoon format how the historic events came to be interwoven with symbolic exaggerations in order to produce the accounts given in the Bible.

And, too, he covers other ancient cultures the same way -- explaining the real history (as best as it can be reconstructed today) behind the mythicized stories of the Trojan War, for example.

472 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:06:59pm

463 bojado71 10/19/2004 06:43PM PST

Thank you! I will copy and follow suit or just write my own! I was NOT aware the fellow had any credentials worth noting!

Regards,
- SangerM

473 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:07:35pm

#468 Lewis

I'll quote a rabbi friend again: "If you ask for arguments for or against the existence of G-d, you're not talking religion, you're talking politics."

Religion is about faith, not proof. It is not about what exists, it is about what you believe - and how it helps you cope (or not) with life. Religions don't even require g-ds - see Buddhism.

What I find disturbing in this whole 'proof' thing is that it often is a barely disguised attempt to damage other people's beliefs, as a first step toward denying them the right to their own beliefs. Maybe if socialism and communism had never existed I would not react like this...

474 Nannette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:07:39pm

#466 Havoc

It's very sad that Arabism has so divided the world, some religions, as well as nations.

Islam has a lot to answer for, and most of all their 'divide and conquer' practices...

The only way Islamism and Arabism can be beaten is by strength of unity...

By 2025 they'll be the major world religion and will then think they have a right to conquer all of us... unless of course something drastic happens in the meantime, like a natural disaster!

475 nagasaki_hata  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:08:54pm

This guy and his "talent" for conveying such ideas in an intelligent/somewhat subtle way are dangerous.

Judaism is the first among noble religions, IMO, Christianity being the second. Christ came to fullfill, not replace it.

My son has Jewish grandparents - he's "jewish enough" for Hitler -- this shit angers and frightens me. He's being raised as a Christian, but as WWII showed, that means little, and in any case as 9-11 shows, we are all Jews now.

Perhaps liberal Jews will wake up and realize just who their enemies really are -- it's not the born again or other Christians -- it's the flipping anti-religious and of course the Islamists.

Thanks for posting this. Just voted today(here in Hawaii nei, we can vote early -- too bad we can't vote OFTEN as do the Dims ;) A Vote for Kerry is a vote against Israel, USA, Western Civ and oh yeah, reason.

BUSH, baby, BUSH !!

476 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:13:15pm

456 Throbert McGee 10/19/2004 06:22PM PST

Very nice. I especially like the comparison of Islam and Judaism. Nicely written.

[Funny too]

-SangerM

477 Mojo Jojo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:15:22pm

This scumbag will never get a real journalism job. The drek he wrote is now in the Google cache. So whenever he applies for a job & a background search is done on Google, it will always appear. He'll just have to convert & change his name to Kareem Abdul al Dukey & get a job at Al-Jazeera.

478 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:15:29pm

448 Mr Pol 10/19/2004 05:09PM PST
#447 anonyrat

> I'm Jewish, not religious.. I wouldn't care either way about Islam if it wasn't violent and preaching genocide. And there's a difference between freely expressing an opinion and being offensive.

Me too, neither, on all accounts!!

- SangerM

479 Victor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:16:23pm

#424 anonyrat:  10/19/2004 03:57PM PS

"However, I tend to be an optimist and have this fanciful idea that evolution will eliminate the insecurity in humans that breeds religion."

Insecurity breeds religion. The things you learn on LGF.

#449 Throbert McGee:  10/19/2004 05:09PM PST

"The atheist who says "the Bible has nothing to teach me because there is no Supreme Being and the miracle-stories are lies made up by men" is as big a fool as the guy who says "I have nothing to learn from Aesop's Fables because everyone knows that tortoises and ants can't actually talk."

What you say.

#452 anonyrat  10/19/2004 05:23PM PST

"...but when I state my opinion that "religion is crap", it somehow transcends the mores of acceptable discourse? Any deep held belief appears to be fair game, but religion is out of bounds?"

Not at all out of bounds. Certainly there is crap to be found in religion. But in the dirty bathwater is also a baby. Check out the baby. Enjoyed your comments.

480 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:17:41pm

#471 Maine's Michael

Yeah? Is your name Michael Jaffe?

481 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:24:10pm

#480 Lewis 10/19/2004 07:17PM PST
#471 Maine's Michael

> Yeah? Is your name Michael Jaffe?

This is just too... well.. too ... kinda-makes-my-teeth- itch-funny!

And Wow! He got your name right the first time?

Is this you too?

Michael Jaffe Duck Stamps

:-D

-SangerM

482 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:25:47pm

#473 Mr Pol

Religion is about faith, not proof.

Amen to that, baby!

The only time I'm tempted to start arguing about the existence of G-d is when someone tries to "prove" it.

Which, as you said, is missing the whole point.

Faith, I respect. Half-assed arguments, I don't have a lot of use for.

483 mich-again  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:27:57pm

This story disgusts me.

Parents, be careful where you send your kids to college. You never know if they'll be down the hall from the Hitler youth posing as the liberal left.

I recommend buying college kids conservative magazine subscriptions so they'll have the data and arguments to stand up to the campus fascists and expose them as dumbasses.

Personally, I miss the Worker's Party idiots at their little table in the Student Center. I loved asking how unemployed losers like them ever got into the Worker's Party.

484 TalkinKamel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:28:26pm

#466 Havoc

I have been following the Episcopal legal battles a little bit. They have their moments of humour, such as the Moonbat Christians-in-name only protesting their deep love for their erring conservative brethren---even as they're launching lawsuits against them. They don't want to lose those churches, or rather, they don't want to lose the INCOME from those churches!

It's also a hoot watching these oh so tolerant moonbats freak out over the idea of one of their churches being led by (gasp, shudder!) an Ugandan Bishop! I mean, it's so. . . you know. . . third world! They're just. . . you know. . . not our kind. . . and how dare these---these UGANDANS act like they have anything at all to tell us about Christianity? We're the ones who're supposed to lead them!

485 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:28:38pm

Hi, been gone for a few hours, just got back.

> I'm Jewish, not religious.. I wouldn't care either way about Islam if it wasn't violent and preaching genocide. And there's a difference between freely expressing an opinion and being offensive.

Well, let me tell you that I would and do care about Islam regardless of whether it practices violence and preaches genocide.

It treats women as chattel. I have posted on this time and time again and I'm not going to let this go. Islam could be as kind to the kufir as is the risen sun when it kisses us all awake in the mornin'. But as long as women are stoned, as long as women are unequal 'moderate Islam' exists on the same planet as unicorns.

Would any of you here not care about the Ku Klux Klan as long as it only preached non-violent racial superiority?

To say that because you are not religious does not release you from the moral obligations of evaluating a value system, even if that value system presents itself as a religion.

I'm being polite. I'm giving you a second chance.

486 Victor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:32:52pm

#456 Throbert McGee  10/19/2004 06:22PM PST

"I used Judaism and Islam as examples, but the wise atheist should recognize that other religious traditions as well have wisdom mixed in with the supernatural claptrap. As an atheist, you're free to take the wisdom and discard the hocus-pocus. But you're a fool if you throw away the wisdom because you disdain the miracle stories."

Dammitall, Throbert, that's what I meant to say, but you said it better. I just hate people who think and type faster than me.

(When the thread gets this fat it takes an e-t-e-r-n-i-t-y to load on dial-up. Drat. My kingdom for cable.)

487 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:33:03pm

#485 grayp

I see your point. But, I think you are wrong: the problem is not with Islam. Tuareg in the Sahara desert are Muslim (at least nominally so), and they do not treat women as chattel. Their social structure is a matriarchy, and believe me, they don't only respect women, they obey them.

Now, my opinion of Arabic culture, OTOH, is very close to your opinion of Islam... :-)

488 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:38:17pm

#487 Mr. Pol

Honey, you know I'd lay down my life for you. But.

Tuareg in the Sahara desert are Muslim (at least nominally so),


The KKK are nominally Christian.

489 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:39:12pm

Aren't the Tuaregs slave traders?

490 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:41:30pm

#456 Throbert McGee. I like it! Your well thought post 456 is something you and I agree on. I wish to 'borrow' from it from time to time.

491 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:45:27pm

#488 grayp

I'd say the Tuareg are more Muslim than the KKK are Christian, but... Anyway, I still think it proves that equal rights for women are not totally incompatible with Islam (but probably mostly so). In my opinion the situation in the Muslim world today comes from three different things: a tribalist social structure, a violent religion and a misogynist culture. Wiping out Islam would not be enough to give equal rights to women, as I don't believe Islam is the root of that evil. Nor would it be enough to build a true democratic society.

That said, I admit I could be wrong.

492 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:47:08pm

485 grayp 10/19/2004 07:28PM PST
Hi, been gone for a few hours, just got back.

> Well, let me tell you that I would and do care about Islam regardless of whether it practices violence and preaches genocide.

>It treats women as chattel, etc.

You could not be more right or me less articulate, I think. I understood Mr Pol to mean, and I meant, that so long as Islam does not attack me and mine, and has not impact on me or my way of life, I do not feel the need to become involved with it, nor especially to fight it.

On the surface, that may seem only self-serving and short-sighted, but I feel that same way about many things which I personally find distasteful or vile. It's is not that I agree with those things, or that I even feel they are legitimate, only that I do not feel I have to engage the world to make it all better for all people.

I am well aware that women are treated badly under Islam. That is one reason we donated money to the Afghanistan Girls School program (not sure of the proper name for the program). I am also aware of how other cultures and peoples treat women, from China to Africa, and we do our best to ensure our daughter is never naive enough to think she might be better off in any of those countries.

But, the world is big, and there are many problems, and as I wrote, the biggest reason I care about Islam today is because it is the state religion of murderers and terrorists. The rest is just part and parcel of the overall package.

Does that make sense?

- SangerM

493 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:47:21pm

- #474 Nanette

The only way Islamism and Arabism can be beaten is by strength of unity...
By 2025 they'll be the major world religion and will then think they have a right to conquer all of us... unless of course something drastic happens in the meantime, like a natural disaster!

Don't fret dear.

The Islamic Culture invented only two things - Pharmacology -- and they stil pursue it with a vengeance -- and Piracy in the name of Religion

The Islamist states can't manufacture and market, they can't grow enough food to feed their populations, they have to import their weapons from France and Russia.

If the Islamists succeed in taking over Europe by end of the century, Europe will starve, (if they haven't blown it up before).

Without oil revenue from the Persian Gulf regions the Islamists are reduced to what they had before the 1900's, -- subsistance from Hand to mouth.

I predict three things by 2050 when world population has peaked and begun to decline.

I - Some kind of major confrontation with China -- the Chinese believe they will have one with the U.S. ; China can't win this, the Three Rivers Dam and other China infrastructure is too vulnerable in a war. What may avert this calamity might not surprise you. The fasting growing conservative Christian churches in the world are in China, then Africa.

II-Some kind of eventual total confrontation to take the Persian Gulf Oil resources away from the Thug Dictators; AND if democracy there proves impossible, some kind of Caliphate of the Western Democracies ruling for the benefit of the indigenous people groups.

III-Never ending conflict for Israel with her neighbors over defensible borders and the "right to exist".

200 years from now it won't matter, the oil resources, of the Persian Gulf will have been exhausted. The productive industrialized countries will have moved on. The bedoins will return to wandering between watering holes.

III-May trump all however, as the "Preachers of Hate" may eventually try to Nuke Tel Aviv and West Jerusalem.

WW IV comes to a climax then. No predictions on the Outcome, other than Havoc and his Celtic Blue Faced tribe are heading to remote farm country.

494 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:48:17pm
Yeah? Is your name Michael Jaffe?


LOL. As my two year old would say, "Nope."

495 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:51:11pm

#489 Maine's Michael

Aren't the Tuaregs slave traders?

Well, they don't sell slaves any more, but... As a cynic put it in 1998, "Yes, they freed the slaves in 1968, but not all of them have been told yet." I've never said Tuareg were perfect - only that their women are definitely not chattel.

BTW, Tuareg is plural, the singular is Targui.

496 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:53:35pm

Thank you, Maine's Michael and SangerM.

For a little more insight into how I think about G-d, as an atheist, read this retelling of Adam's Fall. I transcribed it from an out-of-print library book because it touched me when I was a teenager, so much that I never forgot it. And as an adult, I went to the trouble of tracking down the book in which the story appeared, so that I could transcribe it and post it for other people to read.

I call myself an atheist because I think it's somewhat more likely that there is no Supreme Being than that there is one. But if there is a G-d, I feel myself in no danger of His wrath on account of my atheism -- because I know down to my toes that the most devout believer is not that much closer to His Truth than I am.

How do I know? Well, even supposing that (say) the Torah is the "truthiest" of all the alleged Holy Scriptures that have ever existed in mankind's history, there is not a word of speculation in the Torah that there might be other Jews elsewhere in the Universe -- perhaps ammonia-breathers with wings and six eyes, but Jews by belief, nonetheless.

And yet we know beyond a doubt that there are a fewscore billion galaxies in the Universe; we know that galaxies like our Milky Way are not unusual; we know that yellow stars like our Sun are a dime a dozen; we know that the basic chemical elements from which Earth is made are likely to be commonplace throughout the Universe, or at least in Milky Way-like galaxies. Put all this together and its a statistical certainty that life has evolved to at least slime-mold levels a million and a half times on a million and a half earthlike planets. Is there intelligent life elsewhere? I dunno, but I'm pretty damn sure that this Universe is way too big for the Chosen People to be center and focus of all creation.

Ergo, even if the Torah is the best reflection of G'd's mind currently available to humanity, it is still only a fraction of the Whole Story. So, as an atheist, I'm not that bad off. The Orthodox Jew who believes every word of the Torah with his whole heart and soul is almost as much in the dark as I am.

And that's okay, because if there's a G-d, I've gotta believe that He wants His children to grow up at their own pace.

497 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:59:56pm
BTW, Tuareg is plural, the singular is Targui.

I see one has to get up PRETTY EARLY in the morning to get one up on Mr. Pol!

498 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:02:20pm
499 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:02:57pm

Throbert,

I saved your story to my drive and will read when I have time, which, with three children 4 and under, may be in 16 years.

As regards the cartoon history, which volume do you recommend?

500 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:09:31pm
Well, let me tell you that I would and do care about Islam regardless of whether it practices violence and preaches genocide.

Grayp: High-five and hugs to you! A year or so ago, I got myself into deep shit on a mailing list that skewed left overall and had a critical mass of self-congratulating, ultra-tolerant liberals.

What happened?

Well, one day I said something like "Islam mostly sucks, and Muslims mostly suck, even when they're not blowing shit up -- because they're still wife-beating, gay-bashing, blasphemer-stoning Young Earth Creationists at the end of the day. And you'd be making fun of them of them too if you weren't so GODDAMN DISTRACTED by their brown skin, interesting textiles, and delicious cuisines!"

Eventually, I had to permanently resign from that mailing list because of the LLL clique that insisted on seeing white Christian Republicans as more dangerous than any brown-skinned Muslim could ever be.

I still cling to the hope that the more center-left members of that list have peeled themselves away, leaving the self-infatuated LLLs to stew in their own bile.

501 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:12:48pm

493 Havoc 10/19/2004 07:47PM PST

I think you hit the nail on the head re: this century's potential problems, but there are some smaller ripples that might make a difference. For example:

1. Assuming a less-than-successful fight against aids, Africa, a good part of India, and possibly China will lose a LOT of people. This will not affect India and China so much, but I can see a time when the rest of the world looks at (sub-saharan) Africa and realizes it is essentially open for colonization. A good many of the minerals on the World Powers' "strategic minerals" list (most people don't know there is such a thing) come ONLY from Africa, and I doubt any large nation, or any conglomerate would allow any other to monopolize those resources. I suspect India will have the best chance of moving people to Africa since so many Indians are already there working in a variety of capacities, and because the distance is short. Fact is, I think South Africa had better start looking to grow north or it will find it cannot in a hundred years...

2. Mexico is home to a LOT of people, a good number of whom are POOR and who live in Mexico City (around 20 million people there now, I think). Unless the NAFTA program succeeds in building a wide buffer zone of wealth along the border it is not inconceivable that a charismatic leader could induce the poor to march north en masse. That would be a real problem.

3. Quebec could become a separate country, and being French and anti-American could very well become a North American Algeria. I do not think this would bode well for us.

4. A war with China may happen or it may not, but I think it more likely that the US will fade in influence as China rises. They have the people and the lack of regulatory burden to very quickly generate wealth and prosperity. I think it likely that Chinese people will begin settling elsewhere, and as their numbers grow, and they mix with their new countries, the Chinese culture will become more blended with that of the rest of the world. Hard to say about this.

5. Hispanics are the largest minority in America and growing. I have read and been told that most Hispanics are intent on becoming American--learning English, assimilating to some extent, etc--but their presence alone will change the flavor of the stew we call American Society... To me this is not a bad thing, so long as this country retains is basic social and moral foundations, but I predict America in 100 years will be something very different than what it is now, and in 200 years, could be very much like what's shown in Blade Runner.

There's more, but this should do for now...

-SangerM

502 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:14:00pm

#491 Mr Pol

Wiping out Islam would not be enough to give equal rights to women, as I don't believe Islam is the root of that evil.


Fair enough, as my understanding is that Islam, during its genesis upgraded the standing of women compared to the status quo at the time. Nevertheless, I evaluate Islam's stance regarding women according to the current status quo and find it - how shall I say? - wanting.

SangerM

Does that make sense?


Stop posting that. You've always made sense. Just expect me to challenge, nag, etc. It is wearisome, I know.

Throbert, you are not an athiest. You're an agnostic. An athiest KNOWS there is no god

Havoc I don't know where to begin

The Islamic Culture invented only two things - Pharmacology --


Really? I didn't know that. Your post was excellent.
But you left out one thing.

I have a gun.

I don't mean that in a flippant manner. I mean that to say that Islam will fail because despite its relatively high birth rate, 50% of its population, the women, are helpless housepets.

503 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:14:01pm

#491 Mr Pol, ahem,

Muslim:B1N142 “‘O womenfolk, you should ask for forgiveness for I saw you in bulk amongst the dwellers of Hell.’ A wise lady said: Why is it, Allah’s Apostle, that women comprise the bulk of the inhabitants of Hell? The Prophet observed: ‘You curse too much and are ungrateful to your spouses. You lack common sense, fail in religion and rob the wisdom of the wise.’ Upon this the woman remarked: What is wrong with our common sense? The Prophet replied, ‘Your lack of common sense can be determined from the fact that the evidence of two women is equal to one man. That is a proof.’”
Qur’an 4:15 “If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; if they testify, confine them to houses until death [by starvation] claims them.”
Qur’an 24:34 “Force not your slave-girls to whoredom (prostitution) if they desire chastity, that you may seek enjoyment of this life. [And here’s the freedom-to-pimp card:] But if anyone forces them, then after such compulsion, Allah is oft-forgiving.”
Qur’an 33:51 “You may have whomever you desire; there is no blame.”

Even if she does not desire you? Apparently.

504 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:14:39pm
Well, one day I said something like "Islam mostly sucks, and Muslims mostly suck, even when they're not blowing shit up -- because they're still wife-beating, gay-bashing, blasphemer-stoning Young Earth Creationists at the end of the day. And you'd be making fun of them of them too if you weren't so GODDAMN DISTRACTED by their brown skin, interesting textiles, and delicious cuisines!"

You need your own blog, sir.

505 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:17:26pm

Billy, Charles, Cleanup on Aisle 498,

ep ep, forget it, is O.K.

Rayra World Policeman got it, all taken care of ...


Nothing to see here folks, move along , keep moving ...

506 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:18:57pm
As regards the cartoon history, which volume do you recommend?

Well, Vol. 1 is the only one that I've read so far -- later volumes are in my Amazon wishlist. I believe that he deals with Muhammad in Vol. 3, and I've heard that he defers a bit too much to Muslim sensitivities there. But definitely pick up a copy of Vol. 1.

507 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:21:44pm

Oh Throbert! LOL! Can you email me the list and I shall go raise Havoc? (sorry Havoc)

508 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:23:22pm

#502 grayp

Fair enough, as my understanding is that Islam, during its genesis upgraded the standing of women compared to the status quo at the time. Nevertheless, I evaluate Islam's stance regarding women according to the current status quo and find it - how shall I say? - wanting.

...to say the least. Yeah, Islam has enshrined the Arab culture attitude toward women, and now that I think about it, it probably is spreading it today.

509 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:24:14pm

#503 Roger

See above.

510 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:26:08pm

#405 Maine's Michael

You need your own blog, sir.


He has one! Throbert is brilliant.
But it's not what you might expect

Scroll down. You'll see a pic of me and our beloved Molly the Beagle.

511 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:26:26pm

#506 Throbert McGee.

I recommend
Shattering the Myths of Darwinism too.

FYI, it was written by an agnostic.

512 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:27:52pm

#509 Mr Pol,

problem is not with Islam

?

513 Throbert McGee  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:28:44pm
You need your own blog, sir.

I do, in fact, have a blog for posting this kind of philosophical ruminating: Throbert McGee's Blinkin' Blog. It's just that I've long neglected that blog and have gotten out of the habit of copying my LGF posts to my blog for archival. Perhaps it's time I got back in that habit.

514 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:30:04pm

oops! He's already got it archived - click on the date that will bring up October 10

515 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:30:10pm

Ahhh, 508! I went too far up.

516 SangerM  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:30:54pm

#496 Throbert McGee 10/19/2004 07:53PM PST

Very thoughtful! Thank you!

I am not an atheist, but I do not ascribe to any religion either. I suppose I take the opposite tack from you, in that I have found the world to be far too full of wonder and amazing things, and there have been too many small miracles in my life (and I mean that sincerely) for me to feel otherwise. I used not to feel this way, and claimed agnosticism (denial of knowledge about whether there is or is not a God), but that was when I was younger.
As for the counter argument that a belief in God implies a belief in the Devil, well, I don't know. Evil exists, and I know that, but I am not sure it Satan is the source of it. Sometimes, I think God is the light against the Dark, and the Dark is where we would all be without him.
How's that for "man-made crap."

BTW, if you have never explored Kabbalah, you might want to. It leads to some interesting notions about beings from other planes, planets, etc... Intriguing and thought provoking if nothing else. One book that explains a lot is 'God is a Verb" by David Cooper about Kabbalah and the "Practice of Mystical Judaism."

- SangerM

517 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:31:54pm

#513 Throbert McGee, which way you choose, you should preserve 456.

518 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:33:44pm

#512 Roger

Yup. I think the way women are treated in the Muslim world comes from Arab culture, not from Islam. Islam enshrined that misogynist culture, and today is spreading it, but it is not the problem. Destroy Islam, women won't be better off in the Muslim world - you also need to reform that culture.

519 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:34:53pm

#517 Roger

I second that.

520 Roger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:36:08pm

#516 SangerM, well my fellow Christians don't like it, but I have always felt humans could easily have chosen the tree of the knowledge of good and evil without anybodies help. The probability was very high ~100% - leads to some very interesting questions.

521 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:42:40pm

#518 Mr. Pol

Destroy Islam, women won't be better off in the Muslim world - you also need to reform that culture.


Ok, I don't mean to pick a nic but I'm confused. The only reason I'm up this late (and BTW it's what time where you are?) is because my husband could no longer stand to watch the Yankees game, so it's my job to do it for him.

Anyhoo, is there, currently, an Arab culture that is not Islamic?

522 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:51:58pm

#521 grayp

Anyhoo, is there, currently, an Arab culture that is not Islamic?

There are Christian Arabs, yes. They don't treat women a lot better.

523 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:26pm

Sanger --

Aids has a cure and is working remarkably well in Uganda. It's called celibacy before hetero-marriage and faithfullness after hetero-marriage, it was discovered in the Ugandan Christian Churches. It's a new concept that may be exported to Europe and the United States. Story still developing . . .

Mexico will continue to be a problem for 50 years or more. I predict something like "The Israeli Security Fence" in less than 10 years, from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico.

China may surprise us all, moderate, Continue to Christianize and do the heavy lifting dealing with Islam in 20 years.

Hispanic culture is already a major force in the U.S. We have 5 hispanic stations on basic cable here on the leftcoast. I can't clearly understand the language, but by the looks of it, it's easy to see why it has replaced "the playboy channel".

Now Quebec as a separate Islamic Sharia thuggocracy is a fun concept. "June 1, 2037, U.S. declares war on Royal Islamic forces of Quebec and it's Caliph" June 2, "U.S. declares war with Quebec over, says it may be inhabitable by 2550."

GrayP --

#493 -- official addendum

Grayp has a gun.

Once Islam's leaders are liquidated it's housepets, er women, will follow whoever feeds them, No matter the layout or outcome of the Nuclear Future.


Nanette ... don't fret.

We'll be fine as long as we avoid a major national screw-up and avoid another asleep at the wheel president getting blown in the oval office (when he should be working).

On that note -- vote Bush.

G'nite.

524 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:04:55pm

#523 Havoc

Now Quebec as a separate Islamic Sharia thuggocracy is a fun concept. "June 1, 2037, U.S. declares war on Royal Islamic forces of Quebec and it's Caliph" June 2, "U.S. declares war with Quebec over, says it may be inhabitable by 2550."


ROTFLMAO! I am sooo stealing that!

525 Victor  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:12:54pm

Lordy. I pop back in here and ya'll are yammering on about God & destiny & the freaking cosmos. Fine reading. The lamp is low, and I can't think of a blessed thing to add. Except sweet dreams & goodnight.

526 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:22:31pm
I recommend Shattering the Myths of Darwinism too.

My (well-meaning) advice to the theolaters is: leave evolution, and serious science in general, alone. Heed your own injunction to "render unto Caesar" and realize that there is no conflict: science and religion deal with different aspects of being, and there is nothing precluding "the Supreme Poo-Bah is causa sui" and "2x2=4" both being true.

Attacking a hard science on its own territory is a fight theolatry cannot win; it will only hurt itself in the process by making its adherents look like deluded obscurantist fools with an unsavory agenda.

527 Albertadude  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:28:36pm

Uh, one thing I would like to clarify is that Islam is absolutely brutal too Women and too suggest otherwise is sheer lunacy!!!

While it MAY be true Islam uplifted the Status of Arabic women in pre Islamic levant society, that is like saying Stalin is slightly better then Hitler!!

Uh, all you have too do is look how the women are dressed in Islam too know what it thinks of the fairer sex...and add on to that that a man may have upto four wives and countless concubines (sex slaves) and that when a woman is raped, she needs 4 male witnesses and that a wife may be BEAT for being unsubmissive and on and on...these are all Islamic ideals and teachings that are practiced to this day!!

If we can destroy Islam, you can be damned sure that slowly but surely, the lot of womens lives from Jakarta to Casablanca will start improving!

528 Q  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:42:27pm

Albertadude:

If we can destroy Islam

Take away oil and the greencards (or whatever the EU equivalent is) and Islam will die.

529 BRUTUS  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:29:41pm

#351 anonyrat

I would also support others rights to disagree, boycot, demonstrate, against him and whoever gave him the soapbox.

This is what you say in paragraph 1. In the following paragraphs, however, you language clearly indicates that you do NOT support others' rights to disagree.

You are a hypocrite.

You are also not very sophisticateed, as you do not see the racism in Kurian's article. You claim that if the article read "I hate jews and here is why" then it would be racist, but since it does not, it is not. That is like saying "I love black people because they love their watermelon and fried chicken... and boy, they got rhythm" is not racist because it does not contain any overt language of hatred. A very shallow analysis, my friend, and, based upon my readings and postings on this blog, shallowness is not appreciated here.

Dude, you wanna criticize Israel, go ahead. That, in and of itself, does not make you a racist. When you cloak your racism as criticism against Israel, however, a popular trend these days amongst LLLs so as to avoid being labelled as racist, it is racism. I hope this helps you understand the distinction.

I have many friends, for example, who disagree with Israel's razing of Pali homes. Personally, I agree with it, as it has proven to be an effective deterrent. However, I cannot disagree with those who say that the measure is draconian. It, admittedly, is. My concern, however, is in preventing the murder of Israelis, and if that is one of the only effective measures to do so, I fully support it, no matter how draconian. The fact is that Israel had this war thrust upon it, and war - any war - is tragic in so many ways. While you may believe that the only way to end the war is to abandon certain settlements and keep the wall, I believe that the only way to end the war is for the palis to stop their campaign of terror and sit down and negotiate in good faith.

530 piglet  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:31:22pm
Harvard (30 percent),

Harvard had a history of trying to keep jews out.

A friend of my father's had to go to medical school in Holland in the 1950's due to anti-jew quotas in America. Note that he was able to pass american boards and learn medicine with some of his classes taught in Dutch.

CAL TECH has an average sat score of 1600, meaing every freshman there got a perfect score on the test.

I can't find a link for the harvard donut jew quota story.

531 hershel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 10:31:37pm

It's pretty ironic that Kurian the Jew-baiting scumbag is getting the Harry S. Truman scholarship. Truman had a Jewish partner in his business (I guess that's *real* overrepresented, 50 percent!!) and recognized Israel the day it was born over the objections of the always-reliably-antisemitic State Department.

532 Pickle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 11:54:13pm

Here's how the conversation has gone tonight:

Asshole #1: "The Jews use the blood of arab children to make their bread!"

Someone: Uh, you're nuts. Shut up.

Asshole #2: "YOU STIFLE ANY DISSENT, WHAT ARE YOU, A ZIONIST NAZI?"

Nice team troll.

533 NBK062  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:17:10am

"Seriously, did any of you actually read the article?

All this guy's sayin is that yes, the Jewish people have suffered and, to a lesser extent, still do, but this does not give them the right to oppress freedom of speech. I can't seem to find a paragraph where Mr. Kurian advocates another holocaust or says "Hitler was pretty awesome." Yes, he made his argument in a sensationalist manner, but there's no need to get all huffy about it. The more you complain about the article, the more you validate the point he's trying to make, that the Jewish seem to have developed a (false) sense of entitlement to immunity from any kind of speech that is even slightly derogatory or not in their interests.

michael"

500 posts and counting.

534 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:38:52am
535 Mr Pol  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:53:51am

#533

FOAD.

536 NBK062  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 1:04:10am

#535

Ha ha that's 535 and counting, you can't keep your mouth shut can you. Let's keep the valiadation going...can we hit 600, maybe 700?

537 Roger  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 1:28:49am

#526 Q, are you speaking to me? It's been a long time:-) Very arrogant and assuming of you in 526. You quote me but don't reference. What's up with that? Can't handle a title to a book that has nothing to do with theology or creationism? Very weak. And without knowledge of content to boot. Don't you know that Darwinism is racist tautologies written by racists? Still is? Ever wonder where Mein Kampf got it's supporting material? Talk about an unsavory agenda!

#533 NBK062,

Granted, I tend to err on the side of complete academic freedom; I would probably let the Ku Klux Klan hold a conference on campus, as long as it could be couched within the framework of serious discussion.

He had to put an ignorant qualifier on, didn't he? And that isn't the only nonsensical statement by Kurian. Read the feedbacks below the article before you judge whether people on this thread are reading the article.

538 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:05:55am

#533 NBK062

All this guy's sayin is that yes, the Jewish people have suffered and, to a lesser extent, still do, but this does not give them the right to oppress freedom of speech.


Uh, no, that isn't all he's saying, unless you can somehow show that his insistence that the "shocking" Jewish "over representation" in academia is an example of a Jewish attempt to oppress freedom of speech.

Listen up, pinhead: I'm Jewish, I'm an academic, and I didn't get where I am via some conspiracy or privilege. I worked for it.

Go rot.

539 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:32:54am

Robert:

Q is right about biology. Science has its own rules qua science. People who try to translate the conclusions of science into ideology are committing a basic category error. I mean,so Darwin was a racist:. It means absolutely nothing about the validity of evolutionary biology, and trust me, you do not want to tangle too hard with this issue: I have been around this bush about a zillion times.

The science of evolutionary biology is rock solid. It rests on three pillars: the fossil record, the evidence of deep time, and the twin-nested hierarchy of genetic and morphological taxonomy. Darwin being a racist doesn't affect any of that. It is also plain to me that G-d created the heavens and the earth in six days, and rested on the seventh.

Since I first heard of it, I have agreed with the RAMBAM's advice that matters to do with G-d's nature, and the his creations are not to be taken lightly, and should be discussed only between intimates, and with the learned. I am reminded also that the Pirkei Avuot states that we must not use Torah as a spade to dig with. I am quite sympathetic to many forms of Biblical literalism, but scientific creationism is pretty much a synthetic chimera: an abomination. Beware of it.

(Personal credentials: Two degrees in evolutionary biology, natural history geek, and longstanding veteran of the creation-evolution wars.)

540 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:34:41am

What kind of retards are running Duke?

This:

[Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...]

is how the administration views the issue. The money quote:

In the weeks before the conference, I received many reasoned expressions of concern, but also some attacks on Duke’s decisionthat were astonishing in their virulence. Among the things I found troubling in these messages was the tendency to think of the conference’s supporters in this way: You, Duke student, can be thought of as belonging to a group that contains terrorists and terrorist supporters. Therefore, you are indistinguishable from terrorists and deserve as little opportunity to exercise your rights as they do.

One can understand the passion that underlies such a thought, but that does not prevent it from being highly dangerous. This is the disindividuating, dehumanizing logic of prejudice. It says, I already know you because I know your type—more truthfully, your stereotype.

I was deeply troubled by Philip Kurian’s Oct. 18 column because it seemed to display the same habits of thought. The column was headed “The Jews,” as if Jews were susceptible to group definition, and though its author probably did not mean to, it revived stereotypical images that have played a long-running role in the history of anti-Semitism.

So this person thinks that objecting to the support, solicitation and frank encouragement of terrorism as a point of objective fact

[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]

Is "stereotyping" of the same sort that Kirian does? RRRrrrAAARSGGGRRRGGGgg

ITS NOT STEREOTYPING IF THE PSM IS ACTULLY ENCOURAGING TERRORISTS AND YOU KNWINGLY ALLOW IT. ITS THE TRUTH.

541 Bojado71  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:54:20am

Regarding my posts beginning at #463. Thanks for the kinds words and please also take the time to communicate to those who rely on donations and funding that if they continue to support a racist, they will be exposed to those giving the donations. We should follow the steps the Left takes when they disagree and be as loud and vocal as possible instead of silently fuming or just exchanging comments with others who already agree with us. That will get us nowhere except closer to an ulcer.

By the way, I will be writing the Melcher Family Award for Excellence in Journalism folks tonight and will post the letter on here. I will also post any replies I get from my letters. I will also begin writing to different members of Congress as well as prominant Duke alumni and staff including Coach K. I am expecting few replies, but will make it clear that a lack of reply will be noted in future communications.

Sorry if I sound extreme, but this hypocrisy has just gotten too much for me.

542 sffilk  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:57:55am

#438

I went to college from September 1973 until January 1979, starting at UCLA, then moving to Cal State University Northridge (aka Earthquake U). In 1975(?), when Moshe Dayan came and spoke at the student union at CSUN, the people leading the anti-Dayan protest (it was no rally, it was a full-blown protest) were Arabic and Latino. They didn't want to know the truth, they wanted Dayan off campus.

In 1976 (I think it was 1976!), when the "Zionism=Racism" resolution was passed by the UN, CSUN was the only campus in the CSU system to pass a resolution supporting this flagrant lie and, to the best of my knowledge (and here I could be wrong), it has never been nullified.

Yet, as for me, I am only bigoted against bigots, and that includes anyone who says that as a Jew I have no right to exist.

543 Bojado71  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:00:15am

RE: #540

I believe that Richard H. Brodhead, President, Duke University is on some committee or something that awarded Kurian an honor. I will further research is and then send him a simliar letter to the ones I sent to the organizations last night.

By the way, did you notice he still tried to defend Kurian by saying he probably did not mean what he so clearly wrote...this guy does not even have the guts to fully criticize a racist, but has to soften it..just pathetic.

544 Bojado71  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:11:08am

seems the jewish students at Duke are starting to worry..I do not blame them as the President has allowed a very hostile environment to form there.

[Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...]

545 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:35:47am

Sanger M:

Does that make any sense?

Your description? Yeah, I fully agree.

The situation that you so accurately describe? No, I can't figure out how to make sense out of it at all.

Yankev

546 XanaX  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:38:24am

So Duke President Brodhead has responded to the article with an extremely weak "apology" for the column.
He starts out bt praising those who helped make the PSM Conference "peaceful" (HAH!), then follows up with this little exercise in moral relativism:

"In the weeks before the conference, I received many reasoned expressions of concern, but also some attacks on Duke’s decisionthat were astonishing in their virulence. Among the things I found troubling in these messages was the tendency to think of the conference’s supporters in this way: You, Duke student, can be thought of as belonging to a group that contains terrorists and terrorist supporters. Therefore, you are indistinguishable from terrorists and deserve as little opportunity to exercise your rights as they do.

One can understand the passion that underlies such a thought, but that does not prevent it from being highly dangerous. This is the disindividuating, dehumanizing logic of prejudice. It says, I already know you because I know your type—more truthfully, your stereotype.

I was deeply troubled by Philip Kurian’s Oct. 18 column because it seemed to display the same habits of thought. The column was headed “The Jews,” as if Jews were susceptible to group definition, and though its author probably did not mean to, it revived stereotypical images that have played a long-running role in the history of anti-Semitism."


Completely half-assed.
[Link: www.chronicle.duke.edu...]

547 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:56:54am

#516

As for the counter argument that a belief in God implies a belief in the Devil, well, I don't know. Evil exists, and I know that, but I am not sure it Satan is the source of it.

Jews believed in God for millennia before Christianity turned the idea of Satan into the Devil.

In Judaism, Satan works for, recognizes the authority of, and carries out the wishes of God. Satan has the unpleasant task of tempting man to disobey God's law, and, if man fails the test, acting as prosecutor. Why? Think of it as quality control testing and a necessary adjunct of freee will.

The pagan Zoroastrian Persians believed in two equal gods locked in constant struggle, one a power of goodnes and light, the other a power of darkness and evil Christianity adopted this dualism, but with their newfound belief in the One Creator, turned the god of darkness into a creature rather than a god, specifically a rebellious angel who defied God's authority but would ultimately be defeated by God.

FWIW, in Judasim, an angel has no free will and therefore a rebellious angel would be a contradiciton in terms. The Hebrew word for angel (malach) also means messenger, and an angel is simply a messenger on an unshakeable mission from God.

IOW, no, belief in God by no means implies a belief in the Devil.

548 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:02:42am
Intriguing and thought provoking if nothing else. One book that explains a lot is 'God is a Verb" by David Cooper about Kabbalah and the "Practice of Mystical Judaism."

It is impossible to understand Kabbalah without a thorough grounding in Talmud, Halacha, and experiencing life as an observant Jew. People who think they are studying Kabbalah from taking popular courses or reading English language popular books, and who do not have the necessary background, are like someone who cannot read, add or subtract, let alone do algebra, but think they understand calculus because they look at the pretty drawings and charts in a college textbook they found. And people who pander to them are nothing more than purveyors of snake oil.

549 Jed  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:04:12am

Did Jews get into universities by affermative action, or brains and hard work? Does that make them "privileged"?

I nominate Norman Finkelstien as idiotarian of the year.

550 hershel  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:07:54am

Yankev #48

"It is impossible to understand Kabbalah without a thorough grounding in Talmud, Halacha, and experiencing life as an observant Jew."

Surely you can't be suggesting that Madonna doesn't
*really* understand Kabbalah! :^)

551 anonyrat  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:08:52am

#529 Brutus

Wow. I'm being so thoroughly spanked that I should just slink back to my swastika-laden den.

Once again, my point is being missed. If you read all of my comments from last night, you would find that counter to my newly acquired "anit-semite" label, I am in fact supportive of Israel - including the razing of homes of the terrorists and their families as a deterrent. Being that I see no ability for the "moderate" palestininians (assuming there are some) to have any voice to effect a peaceful solution, the wall makes perfect sense to me given the current state of affairs.

I also believe that the U.S. support of Israel is the largest issue as to why the islamo-fascists are targeting America and our interests. So be it. Our support for Israel as an ally should not waver. In fact, it should strengthen.

My main point is that there should be no sacred cows when it comes to one's ability to express one's opinion. Regardless of whether it is popular or not, I support the ability (and right) to do so. I also support the consequences of this right. If the author of the initial article lost his position due to his views, that is perfectly acceptable to me.

Because my initial posts on this subject were not rabidly opposed to Mr. Kurian, I was labeled an anti-semite. This illustrates my case perfectly. If my penalty for expressing my views (on free speech) forces the anti-semite label, then so be it.

Mr. Kurian is obviously a liberal to the extreme in that his "group identity" thought process leads him to believe that jews are so "over represented" in institutions of higher learning solely based on their group identity rather than the accomplishments of individuals regardless of their group. This is anathema to my way of thinking.

I find much fault in the article, but the ability for him to express his views (and suffer whatever consequences - if any) are also part of the deal.

552 hershel  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:24:56am

Anonyrat #551

You still don't have a freakin' clue, do you? One of the first things you wrote in this thread was this:

"I don't see any Jew-bashing"

when this guy was spewing out the most contemptible bigoted anti-semitic stereotypes and implying that Jews do not deserve what they have earned through their hard work and diligence. Now you're changing the subject and defending Kurian's right to "expression". Well, we here on LGF are expressing ourselves too.

Kurian of course has the right to spew out whatever kind of bigoted venom he wishes while standing on a street corner, or posting to a blog - I'm sure there are many that would welcome his repellent views. But newspapers have editors and make choices as to what they do and do not print. He has no more "right" to have that crap published in the campus newspaper than David Duke has to be the commencement speaker. I wouldn't be surprised to see it at this point, though.

553 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:40:57am

#551

Mr. Kurian is obviously a liberal to the extreme in that his "group identity" thought process leads him to believe that jews are so "over represented" in institutions of higher learning solely based on their group identity rather than the accomplishments of individuals regardless of their group. This is anathema to my way of thinking.

He is also obviously an anti-Semite. Very few anti-Semitten will say that they hate Jews just for being Jews. I saw a wonderful column whose author and location sadly escape me. He wrote that never in Poland were Jews killed or hated simply for being Jews. "The Jews" were hated and killed for being too religious and for being atheist. For being capitalists and for being communists. For being clannish and for pushing themselves in where they did not belong. And so on with pairs of obviously contradictory traits, all of which anti-Semites used to justify their hatred of "The Jews."

One classic theme of left and right wing anti-Semitism is that "the Jews" enjoy special privileges and power, which they gained not through individual achievement and hard work but thorugh nefarious and unfair means. Mr. Jurian has tapped into this theme. Whether he realizes it or not (and I suspect he does not), that makes him every bit as much an anti-Semite as one who says "I hate Jews because they kill gentile childrena nd eat their blood" or "because they killed my savior" or "theya re all greedy theiving bastards."

Period.

As to freedom of speech, I agree that it would be foolish to invoke a hate speech code to sanction Mr. Kurian. But freedom of speech does not imply a duty to provide a forum. There was a time when responsible newspapers did not provide a forum for antiSemtisim and other forms of bigotry. There was a time when decent people rebuked or snubbed those who publicly expressed public bigotry.

When Henry Ford ran a series "The International Jew" , based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, in his newspaper, more than 100 prominent Christians took out ads in the NYT and other major newspapers, proclaiming that anti-Semitism was a problem to be oopposed by all civilized people and not just by Jews. Signors included William Howard Taft and Jane Hull. Polite people distanced themselves from Ford until he repudiated his views.

Such is not censorship, but rather simple etiquette. And in a democracy composed of numerous ethnic groups who ideally must get along in order to advance their common welfare, it is also political common sense.

And it is that lack of etiquette and common sense on the part of Duke and the Chronicle that I lament, even more than I lament Mr. Kurian's transparent Jew baiting. As do I lament that so few of the letters objecting to Mr. Kurian's filth appear to be signed by Duke's non-Jewish students.

Does failure to recognize Kurian's Jew baiting make you an anti-Semite? Of course not. Does it make you an enabler and abettor? Perhaps. And perhaps you should look at his remarks with the benefit of a bit more knowledge of history.

554 Maine's Michael  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:46:21am

Kurian:

Thank you for demonstrating conclusively that anti-Zionism does, in fact, equal anti-Semitism.

Feedback at the chronicle left by 'Gershom'

555 ploome hineni[deleted]  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:49:41am
556 cba  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:50:43am

I just read the feedback (57 comments so far) and found it wonderfully comforting. The vast majority were opposed to it, and made excellent points. Of the few supporting comments, all but one were so insane that the posters were clearly either rabid Jew-haters or someone acting the froll.

557 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:54:39am

#553 Yankev

Well put (again).

Like any other phenomenon, antisemitism is defineable by its regular patterns, and blithely assuming that because it is a prejudice, it will be recogniseable by the same standards as another prejudice is like saying that one can easily diagnose colon cancer by doing a mammogram. Similar diseases vary widely in their presentations.

So with anti-semitism. Only when you are familiar with its forms and expressions (and Killian does a bang up job of hitting on the major themes) will you see it.

anonyrat: to see what Yankev is saying you need to study the history of antisemitism. It isn't enough to just say "prejudice is prejudice": each prejudice is different.

558 anonyrat  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:59:01am

#456 Thobert

So when you say "religion is crap," you aren't crossing the bounds of acceptable discourse; you're crossing the bounds of intelligent discourse.

I'm such a blogtard. Being relatively new to the blogosphere, I suppose it would be wise to compose my comments more thoughtfully rather than just make them in a conversational way.

In conversation it might go like this:

me - religion is crap
you -

Not all traditional religions have wisdom in the same proportions, however. Judaism and Islam provide the starkest possible contrast, and one needn't assume the intervention of G-d or Satan to understand why Jews have made such outstanding contributions to philosophy, to science, to philanthropy, while Muslims, for almost all of their history, have excelled only by pillaging and scavenging the creativity of other cultures. The key difference is that Judaism constantly encourages debate and argument and self-examination and skeptical scrutiny of tradition, while Islam declared itself complete and perfect early on, slammed the door on debate, and has been a stagnant intellectual swamp ever since.

me - I still think religion is crap - you doo doo head.


Just because I deem it "crap" does in no way assume that any wisdom-nuggets contained therein are discarded as crap too. I don't really need to credit the ten commandments as to why killing is probably a bad thing in most circumstances.

I also don't see a need to wipe myself with three stones after I go to the bathroom or to believe that when a red calf is born is jeruselem that the temple needs to be rebuilt so that sacrifices can be made.

559 hershel  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:03:20am

#558 anonyrat

"Just because I deem it "crap" does in no way assume that any wisdom-nuggets contained therein are discarded as crap too. "

But that would certainly be the most reasonable, if not the ONLY reasonable inference of your statement. And that has nothing to do with being "new to the blogosphere".

560 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:12:02am

anonyrat: in real conversation it would go like this

you: "religion is crap"
me: "How very interesting. "

You should bear in mind the following scene from Austin's Sense and Sensibility:

Mr Ferrars: "Some people imagine that there can be no accommodations, no space in a cottage; but this is all a mistake. I was last month at my friend Elliott's, near Dartford. Lady Elliott wished to give a dance. 'But how can it be done?' said she: 'my dear Ferrars, do tell me how it is to be managed. There is not a room in this cottage that will hold ten couple; and where can the supper be?' I immediately saw that there could be no difficulty in it, so I said, 'My dear Lady Elliott, do not be uneasy. The dining-parlour will admit eighteen couple with ease; card-tables may be placed in the drawing-room; the library may be open for tea and other refreshments; and let the supper be set out in the saloon.' Lady Elliott was delighted with the thought. We measured the dining-room, and found it would hold exactly eighteen couple,- and the affair was arranged precisely after my plan. So that, in fact, you see, if people do but know how to set about it, every comfort may be as well enjoyed in a cottage as in the most spacious dwelling." Elinor agreed to it; she did not think he deserved the compliment of rational opposition.

In real life, people like me play Elinor to your Ferrars. Online, the usual social constraints on behavior are to some degree lessened. Think about it.

561 Q  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:16:26am

Hhar (#539):

Q is right

Heh.

562 cba  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:17:24am

#560 Hhar:
I think that's a wonderful explanation.

(BTW, the Ang Lee movie was the only time I can remember that I enjoyed a movie more than the book it was based on. I found the Elinor of the book to be a humourless prig with no charm whatsoever, and couldn't see why either she or Edward were attracted to each other.)

563 Q  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:33:00am

Roger (#537):

I apologize if you perceive my disrespect as directed at you personally. Thing is, I view creationism as horseshit with not-quite-hidden unsavory agenda (theocracy, to be blunt).

That book, which I admittedly haven't read, struck me as one promoting that very kind of horseshit under the guise of "objectivity".

I may be wrong -- regarding the book, but not regarding creationism.

564 Composmentis  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:42:24am

I posted a cpmment yesterday supporting freedom
of speech, with certain restraints, and I would add
now, responsibilities. I added that I had read that no
recorders would be allowed at the conference, and
decried the failure to support freedom of the press,
as this implied.

There was no direct response. There were a few
snide references to supporters of free press. I saw
no evidence of any concern that the actual words
spoken would never be available to anyone who
might wish to print the messages delivered.

If there is a proof that we have freedom of speech, it exists here, on this blog. It may range from inane vulgar ranting to philosophical wisdom based on
good information, but it is free.

If I am deemed a troll, so be it. If someone can
direct me to a transcript of the event in whole or
part I would appreciate it.

565 Havoc  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 8:39:24am

#534 Rayra

wth are you jabbering about? - try reading some of may05 past posted shit. Then come back here a criticize my response to the creature.

Hey no problem pal. Feed the Lebanese Troll all you want. Perhaps hatemongers deserve a JDAM in their dining room

You have a mind and a memory like a steel trap. Nice job on May05.

AND, Alcoholics panhandling, AND Trolls should be ignored and left to starve.

When they get hungry enough, they'll stumble into the
Rescue Mission

Free country, and a policy difference in dealing with trolls. After years of failing, I try not to feed them.

As far as in your face Troll bashing, Nice job tho, 10.5 for style points.

566 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 10:04:47am

Hhar

blithely assuming that because it is a prejudice, it will be recogniseable by the same standards as another prejudice is like saying that one can easily diagnose colon cancer by doing a mammogram.

Terrific analogy!
Yankev

567 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 10:14:38am

#558

I also don't see a need to wipe myself with three stones after I go to the bathroom

Thank you for a perfect example of why the unlearned ant should not flatter themselves that they understand the Talmud because they managed to skim through an English language transaltion or a summary.

The Talmud is a mixture of the prescriptive, the proscriptive, the philosophical, the descriptive/historic and much more.

In the case of using three stones, it is being descriptive, not normative. The Talmud does not say one should wipe oneself in this way. It is describing the customary hygenic practice at the time (glad I didn't have to do that) in a region where vegetation was sparse and seasonal (hence no mulberry leaves) or abrasive (grasses were proscribed because of the risk of serious injury). Remember that until the late 19th century, paper was made from rags, and was not the cheap substance that we take for granted today. One would no more have wiped oneself with paper than with silk.

I assure you that contemporary observant Jews in Western countries (this includes Israel) use paper for this purpose rather than stones, and that no recognized Jewish religious authority thinks that by doing so we are somehow being untrue to Torah.

568 piglet  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 10:32:49am
I also don't see a need to wipe myself with three stones after I go to the bathroom

Demolition man:

In the movie, "Demolition Man" with Wesley Snipes and Slyvester Stallone, Stallone plays a character named "John Spartan."

Anyway, in the movie John Spartan misses out on about 50 years of things by being cyrogenically frozen. He is awakened to capture Snipes character.

There's a scene where Spartan comes out of the washroom, leans over and hints to Sandra Bullock's character, Lena Huxley, that the washroom needs more toilet paper. "In the place where the toilet paper normally is, you've got these three sea-shells..."


"he doesn't know how to use the three sea shells. HAHAHAHHAHAHHA"

569 anonyrat  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 11:06:14am

#567 Yankev

Also an illustration as to why the dimwitted peacock should not assume he knows with certainty of which he speaks.

Narrated 'Abdullah:
The Prophet went out to answer the call of nature and asked me to bring three stones. I found two stones and searched for the third but could not find it. So took a dried piece of dung and brought it to him. He took the two stones and threw away the dung and said, "This is a filthy thing."

What is this talmud of which you speak?

570 Paco from Sefarad  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 11:56:54am

#452 anonyrat

I have studied many religions, probably moreso that many of the adherents of those religions.

#569 anonyrat  

What is this talmud of which you speak?

Yet you know not of the Talmud of which we speak?

571 anonyrat  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:18:00pm

#570 Paco

Sorry, i forgot to close my comment with the /sarcasm tag.

572 Hhar  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:31:55pm

#571 anonyrat

Too late for one thing, and not enough, for another.

#561 Q: I think we've agreed once before about something (I forget what). It was bound to happen again sooner or later, I suppose ;)

573 Maine's Michael  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:34:06pm
I note that your 'scholarship' is funded in part by the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation.

Rest assured I and others will be asking them if this is the sort of scholarship they want funded with their money.

In the meantime, you may want to reflect on how easy it is to ruin one's future career based on an ill thought out screed that gets national attention.

That is, of course, unless you plan to spend your career in the arab world.

Maine's Michael
Maine

It got posted on the feedback to the "editorial".

Maybe he'll have a sleepless night or two.

574 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:42:38pm

#567

unlearned ant

PMF
I started to write "ignorant", thought better of it and wrote unlearned but neglected to finish deleting my prior choice of words.

No tribute was intended, implied or otherwise, to the diligence of the one who first wrote about stones as a hygiene device.

Yankev

575 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:50:12pm

#567

Also an illustration as to why the dimwitted peacock should not assume he knows with certainty of which he speaks.

Touche. (Pronounced too-shay.)

Also as to why I should never do my own proofreading (see #574)

I did not realize you were quoting from Muslim sources. But even so, it does not appear to this Kufr that the use of 3 stones (or any stones) is religiously mandated; it appears more to be describing (or taking for granted) the hygienic practices of the time. If anyone has a source that this is normative and not prescriptive, I'd be interested in knowing it.

Why three stones you ask? Nothing magical or religious about it. They were in decreasing size, so as to allow the user to clean progressively smaller areas around the relevant orifice. See Tractate Shabbos, I forget exactly where, but somewhere in the 8th or 9th chapter.

576 Yankev  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:24:57pm

My response to the Chronicle (we'll see if their moderator posts it):

In response to Duke 98, the reaction is not so much hypocrisy as disappointment. Of course people realize
that Mr. Kurian's views cannot be attributed to Duke as a whole, or even to the Chronicle. On the other hand, there was a time when responsible publications realized that free speech does not require one to give a forum to blatantly anti-Semitic or racist views. The Chronicle's apparent disregard for this principle is legitimate cause for criticism. If the Chronicle staff is not capable of realizing why Mr. Kurian's column is in fact an expression of blatant anti-Semitism, the more shame on them for their lack of judgment and analytical skills.

President Brodhead was warned before the conference that PSM conferences on other campuses had resulted in an upsurge in anti-Jewish speech and anti-Jewish violence. He chose to deny those risks. In the name of protecting free speech and the right to know, he even supported the PSM's ban on allowing reporters and observers into their sessions. Mr. Kurian's hateful and hate filled piece was hardly unforeseeable. Pres. Brodhead used poor judgment,
and there is no shame in holding this against him.

Not so long ago, public purveyors of racism, genocide and Jew baiting were shunned in polite society and chants of "Death to the Jews" were not deemed worthy of presence on U.S. college campuses. Duke's president apparently sees no reason to preserve this no doubt outmoded taboo, and does not lament its passing. Nor does he seem to realize
his own role in hastening its unfortunate passing.

Finally, it does not speak well of Duke's faculty and curriculum that a senior student and scholarship
recipient, presumably among the finest Duke has to offer, can write such a column for publication. Apparently no one taught him elementary principles of logic, and any western or middle eastern history he learned was colored by political biases and uninformed by sources contemporary to the events. Had he received a proper education, he would know that much of the PSM's view of the middle east is based on myth rather than fact, and he would also know that his rantings have precedent in every anti-Semitic movement of modern times, often with predictably tragic results. That his greatest support has come from Holocaust deniers speaks volumes, as was pointed out by others. That he seems unaware of what he is saying speaks volumes of Duke's having failed a student who apparently had great potential.

In short, it is indeed foolish to attribute Mr. Kurian's views to Duke students in general. It is perfectly legitimate to hold Duke, its president and the Chronicle responsible for their respective failures in this
disgraceful incident, just as it is legitimate to wonder why more non-Jews have not condemned Mr. Kurian's screed.

577 Composmentis  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:31:05pm

A plea.
Is no one on this thread willing to post a
reply to my earlier post #563?

578 Composmentis  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:32:01pm

Sorry for error. Reply to post #564.

579 sffilk  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 3:52:51am

The Jew-haters are fighting back:

This feedback is 96.2% Jewish Filth. The amount of zionist rubbish that has arisen because of this simple, non-offensive article, clearly proves the author's point. Jews don't like to be offended. Oh boo hoo, Jews! What an outcry over simple statement of FACT. What are you trying to cover up, Jews? Why don't you all stop hiding behind the pro-Israeli puppet show you call the media and face the facts, Israel is becoming the monster that Germany was during the Third Reich.

/s/Karsten Chu

Shame on you educated JEWS, who can’t even take criticism --- you all proved Kurian to be sooo RIGHT!!!

/s/ Linda Smith

580 Paco from Sefarad  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 4:06:45am

#579 sffilk

Of course that isn't antisemitism, not even antizionist, just freedom of speech.

/sarcasm

581 Yankev  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 4:35:45am

#564
We'd all love to see a transcript. According to the articles at Frontpagemagazine.com, PSM first announced that no cameras or recorders would be allowed. As the conference drew closer, they announced that even note taking would be banned.

582 Roger  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 7:30:57am

#563 Q, if you come back to this thread. Ok. You are wrong about the book and also wrong with Hhar about my position on the subject. You both assume too much and claim to be so superior with knowledge about biology that you both suggest I don't even look at it.

I never brought up Creationism, literalism or theocracy(of which I am utterly apposed) Just like I am apposed to rascism couched in the fine words of evolution. Theocracy can easily be apposed without forming a religion around Darwin's myths.

The book was written by Richard Milton, who criticises (neo)Darwinism without religious objections. I believe I gather he is an agnostic.

Darwin himself wasn't an extreme racist but many others were like Huxley. The thoughts of the era did influence him.

Hhar

The science of evolutionary biology is rock solid

And this is a perfect example of why there is such stagnation in the biological establishment and does not admit to any unknowns or limitations in any of the scientific methodologies they employ. Richard Milton points out that physicists are more honest and have progressed because of it and biologists need to learn from them if they want to progress. Instead they sit and claim to be all knowing while the physicist go so far as to speculate about hidden variables and such.

Darwin being a racist doesn't affect any of that.

What a person believes and thinks always effects that person's scientific efforts; don't kid yourself it doesn't. It is why there are such differences of opinion on the interpretation of data. The physicists have done experiments to prove that results of experiments are effected by the observer.

It is also plain to me that G-d created the heavens and the earth in six days, and rested on the seventh.

Not so plain to me unless the KJV is somehow mystically the first language of the oracles of G-d and man's translations and writings are somehow guaranteed to be perfect. I'm not completely set in my view on this one; perhaps someone can help me with the translations for the Hebrew words for evening and morning. Also Genesis does not cover the beginnings of the universe, formation of matter beyond the laws of conservation of mass and energy, origins of life and so forth. It is really more interested in describing the beginning of G-d's relationship with humans. In fact the second verse starts the whole explanation with a past tense to describe the earth:

Now5 the earth6 was without shape and empty


I'm looking for it but can't find it at the moment, there is a verse that says something to the effect "Look to nature(science); by the principles and mechanisms you find there, by these G-d made it all happen". But the Scriptures do not fill in more details than that so why people get all lathered up is beyond me. Richard Milton and I just don't see Darwinism or neoDarwinism as the answer from a scientific and continued progress in physics approach all the while remaining aware of our current limitations in experimental methodology and belief influence.

Looking at [Link: www.bible.org:...]

3tn The English verb “create” captures well the meaning of the Hebrew term in this context. The verb ar`B* (B*r*a) always describes the divine activity of fashioning something new, fresh, and perfect. The verb does not necessarily describe creation out of nothing (see, for example, v. 27, where it refers to the creation of man); it often stresses forming anew, reforming, renewing (see Ps 51:10; Isa 43:15, 65:17).

illustrates one must get a clear appreciation for the meaning of the word 'create'.

65:17 Isaiah 65:17 For look, I am ready to create new heavens and a new earth! The former ones41 will not be remembered; no one will think about them anymore.42

predicts it will happen again.

583 Bojado71  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 8:39:23am

Well I have received the first reply to my letters to organizations subsidizing Phil Kurian's education and it is a doozy! This reply is from Bob Korstad, Director of the B.N. Duke and Trinity Scholars Program which is paying Phil Kurian's full college bill. It is the most stark evidence I have ever seen of how left wing racism is tolerated on campuses and seen as a "teaching moment" (to quote Mr. Korstad) while right wing racism (and rightly so) is completely not tolerated.


Here is the letter ...just amazing.


Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:10:45 -0400
From: "Bob Korstad" Add to Address Book
To: "Gary Friedman"
Subject: duke


Dear Mr. Friedman,

Thanks for your note on Phil Kurian's column in the Chronicle. I too was very concerned by what he wrote, and I have talked to him and other people at Duke about it.

I have known Phil since he came to Duke. He has been an outstanding student and has played an important leadership role on campus, particularly on issues of race. I have had many discussions with him over these years, and I have never heard him utter a single word that I would consider racist or anti-Semitic.

But his column displayed prejudice, ignorance, and immaturity, and I am hoping to use this as a teaching moment for Phil and others in the Duke community.

Although I am disappointed in Phil's judgment, he will not lose his scholarship. The BN Duke and Trinity Scholarship program has students from
many racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds. Phil's hardest job will be to regain their trust.

I refer you to President Brodhead's letter in yesterday's Chronicle for more about how the university will treat this issue.

Thanks you again for your concern.


Cordially,


Bob Korstad, Director
B.N. Duke and Trinity Scholars Program

Robert Korstad
Associate Professor of Public Policy Studies and History
Duke University, Sanford Institute of Public Policy
Box 90245 Durham, NC 27708-0245
919)613-7335/fax(919)681-8288

584 Hhar  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 11:30:44am

Roger, you write:

And this is a perfect example of why there is such stagnation in the biological establishment and does not admit to any unknowns or limitations in any of the scientific methodologies they employ. Richard Milton points out that physicists are more honest and have progressed because of it and biologists need to learn from them if they want to progress. Instead they sit and claim to be all knowing while the physicist go so far as to speculate about hidden variables and such.

I'm not sure what you mean by stagnation. Can you give an example of such "stagnation"? I look back on the history of evolutionary biology since I started formally studying it, and I can point you to several major revolutions in methodology and theory. In specific, molecular phylogeny, game theory, paleoecology and cladistic methods of taxonomy have all achieved spectacular advances in the area of evolutionary biology alone. Add to that the application of molecular biology and developmental biology to basic problems in evolution, and frankly I don't see stagnation at all. I know a good number of practising evolutionary biologists, and NONE of them have ever told me that they are all knowing, and in fact during my formal education, it was stressed to me several times that there are important areas of evolutionary biology that of necessity we will always be ignorant of.

What a person believes and thinks always effects that person's scientific efforts; don't kid yourself it doesn't. It is why there are such differences of opinion on the interpretation of data. The physicists have done experiments to prove that results of experiments are effected by the observer.

Ummm...I beleive that what you are citing is the notion that the ACT of observing affects reality. This has nothing to do with the ideology/beleifs of the observer (which is what you are referring to. In any event, if you think that Darwin's racism affects the validity of evolutiobnary biology, you are going to somehow have to demonstrate that racial prejudice effects the validity of the fossil record, the evidence of deep time, and the twin-nested hierarchy of genetic and morphological taxonomy. Just saying "Well, it could" is an extraordinarily weak argument.

As to the nature of G-d's creation of the Universe, I am sorry I didn't make my position clear: its not a topic that I my particular approach to should be bandied about carelessly, and certainly not in this context. I don't reference the KJV, but the Masoretic text, though I will say that I'm not a naive literalist: I just sound that way;)

585 Hhar  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 12:41:51pm

And a follow up for Roger.

If you go here:

[Link: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...]

Enter as a search term "molecular evoltion". It will list the titles (and link you to the abstracts, and in some cases, the whole paper) of peer reviewed articles on molecular evolution (a small portion of evolutionary biology). Note: several hundred papers since 1967. take a look at this one:

[Link: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...]

Note the abstract:

We further show that the conclusion of the earlier study is likely confounded by two factors introduced by the relatively limited sample size: (1) nonuniform distribution of genes in the genome, and (2) stochastic noise in substitution rates inherent to short lineages such as the human-chimpanzee lineage. Our results offer a general cautionary note on the importance of controlling for hidden factors in studies involving bioinformatic surveys

Sound like a stagnat field? More like a controversy to me. Howabout this one:


[Link: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...]

wherein the expected genetic diversity of a plant population is NOT explained by simple models of molecular evolution. No stagnation there. howabout this one:

[Link: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...]

where transposable elements are demonstrated to contain fractions of genic sequences, that could be a fertile ground for molecular evolution.

There is no stagnation here: this is a fascinating and largely unknown world that is constantly throwing surprises at the researchers investigating it, and the researchers can also identify real patterns that fit with evolutionary theories developed from other disciplines (like, say, paleontology):

[Link: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...]

If there is a point of stagnation, it is that no one thinks that the science points anywhere but the notion that all life evolved through deep time into its current state. This is an idea that is not going to go. But then again, i don't know of a physicist that thinks that there is any doubt that a hydrogen ion contains one proton. Some facts are simply very well established.

586 Roger  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 2:24:03pm

#584 Hhar

Can you give an example of such "stagnation"?

survival of the fittest yadda yadda yadda...How do we know which creatures are the most fit? Check out the ones that have survived. Why did they survive? Because they were the most fit. Yadda yadda yadda... The public and it's schools have gotten no where and there are a lot of biologists want it that way because they have an 'unsavory agenda' using Q's words. Even what you cite as advances hinges on all past preconceptions and analysis of the data is not as cut and dried as evolutionary biologists claim. The very choice of words by evolutionary biologists loudly proclaims their prejudice. Their ever consuming need to put things in hierarchies and catagories. If you ever have time, stand back from it all and stare at it and another picture may emerge like an autostereogram.

you are citing is the notion that the ACT of observing affects reality

Nope, nothing about changing reality. I'm saying people can think they understand something and be completely wrong for their entire life. If they build on a wrong observation any dependent 'understanding', it too is flawed.

In any event, if you think that Darwin's racism affects the validity of evolutiobnary biology, you are going to somehow have to demonstrate that racial prejudice effects the validity of the fossil record, the evidence of deep time, and the twin-nested hierarchy of genetic and morphological taxonomy.

I don't have to demonstrate that two wrong interpretations have or don't have cause and effect. That's your job. You cite it all as if it's all wrap up and wearing a bow tie. Again please don't attribute all the racism of Darwinism to Darwin:-) He had a lot of help.
There is no straightforward mapping between genes and 3d body layout. No bow tie to 'twin-nested hierarchy of genetic and morphological taxonomy'. (BTW, twin-nested hierarchy is an old phrase but reapplied.) In fact that problem is one of the surprises Richard Milton discusses in the book with the title I recommended that started Q to responding to me again:-) Q and I have a little history on the long, long, (longest?) thread:-) Q tried to irritate me and I replied that Q's contribution is white noise. Well this is the first we have written directly since and I'm glad for it because both of you are thinkers.

...my particular approach to should be bandied about carelessly...

Agreed:-)

587 Hhar  Fri, Oct 22, 2004 3:06:32am
survival of the fittest yadda yadda yadda...How do we know which creatures are the most fit? Check out the ones that have survived. Why did they survive? Because they were the most fit. Yadda yadda yadda...

When I went to University (and since then things I doubt have changed that much) it was pointed out that "survival of the fittest" (I assume you are quoting Spencer's conception of Darwinism, and not Darwin's, who never said anything of the like) was indeed a tautology. However, if you consult the actual evolutionary literature, you will see that NOWHERE in modern evolutionary biology is "fitness" equated with "survival".

According to most biologists, "fitness" is a theoretical quantity which is either maximised, optimised, or simply sufficed by evolutionary processes, under various biological (e.g. environmental, physiological ) constraints. There is no tautology in its use, any more than any other predictive model is "tautological (and in a sense, all such models are "tautological", as formal systems have results that flow logically from their axioms and initial conditions.) Quite simply, "fitness" isn't a "thing" so much as an heuristic construct for modelling purposes, and it is defined differently according to the requirements of the model.

As to the definition of fitness (as I alluded to above) it is certainly not "survival": the fitness of a gene or genotype or trait has to do with its ability to propagate through time, either relative to others or in absolute terms. It can be thought of in terms of its probability of propagating in the present, second, third or nth generation, but primarily the maximisation (or whatever) of fitness is thought of as being the theoretical means by which biological phenomena can be predicted to result in the observed patterns of population changes in time.


The public and it's schools have gotten no where and there are a lot of biologists want it that way because they have an 'unsavory agenda' using Q's words. Even what you cite as advances hinges on all past preconceptions and analysis of the data is not as cut and dried as evolutionary biologists claim.


All science is an historical endeavor; as Shaw put it, a tree does not grow in the middle of the air. I regard it as a failure of professional biologists and teachers if people think that the data is cut and dried: it certainly is not. But like I say, some things about evolution ARE pretty much as well set as any other scientific notion, and those things are generally what get people excited and annoyed about evolution. As to agenda, I agree with you whole heartedly that evolutionary biology is certainly used to push an anti-theist agenda, and even that many evolutionary biologists have such an agenda. However, many do not. Neither fact validates or invalidates the science: the validation of science can only be assesssed via its ability to predict, explain and control the natural world.


The very choice of words by evolutionary biologists loudly proclaims their prejudice. Their ever consuming need to put things in hierarchies and catagories. If you ever have time, stand back from it all and stare at it and another picture may emerge like an autostereogram.

See above, but wrt hierarchy and category, all I can say is that you should try to work a bit in biology, and you will see that hierarchies and categories are not just heuristics, but real entities. The precise structure and definition of those entities is the subject of furious debate, and has undergone extensive revision (like I said) within my own adult life, but like my hydogen ion, no one in science seriously doubts that they address real biological entities. Just like physicists have a "consuming need" to pop atoms into categories and called atoms, isotopes, and states of matter, so are the concepts of "species" and "clade" categories notions that reflect (however ambiguously) reality.

588 Hhar  Fri, Oct 22, 2004 3:23:34am
I don't have to demonstrate that two wrong interpretations have or don't have cause and effect. That's your job. You cite it all as if it's all wrap up and wearing a bow tie. Again please don't attribute all the racism of Darwinism to Darwin:-) He had a lot of help.

Waalll, I dunno. If Darwin's racism is proposed as an objection to the empirical validity of evolutionary biology, then science has a great big problem, 'cause Shockley (the guy who won the Nobel for his work on Solid state electronics) was a Eugenecist and Oppenheimer was a Communist... You see where this is going?

There is no straightforward mapping between genes and 3d body layout. No bow tie to 'twin-nested hierarchy of genetic and morphological taxonomy'. (BTW, twin-nested hierarchy is an old phrase but reapplied.)

Well, I don't recall anyone saying that there is a straightforward mapping of genes to body layout, because that's the realm of evo-devo, and that field is both exploding and anything but straightforward. The twin-nested hierarchy doesn't refer to evo-devo so much as the fact that molecular phylogeny, worked out on the basis of non-structural genetic changes (e.g. tRNA sequences, which do not determine body morphology ) reflects phylogenies worked out on purely morphological bases. In point of fact, evo-devo is re-inforcing the idea that our fundamental hierarchical divisions are in fact appropriate reflections of the history of life on earth, from a purely scientific point of view.


In fact that problem is one of the surprises Richard Milton discusses in the book with the title I recommended that started Q to responding to me again:-) Q and I have a little history on the long, long, (longest?) thread:-) Q tried to irritate me and I replied that Q's contribution is white noise. Well this is the first we have written directly since and I'm glad for it because both of you are thinkers.

I apologise if I stuck my nose in. Oops. In any event, its always good to meet a skeptic, as one thing I think we can agree on is that independant thought is precious.

589 Princess Valium  Fri, Oct 22, 2004 10:09:17am

I think it's great that everyone is scribbling about what an ass Kurian is. What I want to know...what more will be done? This turd shouldn't be allowed to keep that nice, free ride he has. His editor's head should roll. Why aren't the Dookie students protesting more?


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Play nice.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

Discover the World's largest E-Book Store! Save big on bestsellers!

 Frank says:

I think you should leave it up to the parent, because not all parents want to keep their children totally ignorant. -- Frank Zappa in response to a question from Senator Hollings.