LGF

-RetweetCarter: The Revolutionary War Was "Unnecessary"

Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 2:00:59 pm PDT

It’s a pity that, as a past winner, Jimmy Carter can’t be in the running for this year’s Idiotarian of the Year award—because this mind-bending interview with Chris Matthews would make him a shoo-in: ‘Hardball with Chris Matthews’ for Oct. 18. (Hat tip: johnCV.)

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you the question about—this is going to cause some trouble with people—but as an historian now and studying the Revolutionary War as it was fought out in the South in those last years of the War, insurgency against a powerful British force, do you see any parallels between the fighting that we did on our side and the fighting that is going on in Iraq today?

CARTER: Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought. I think another parallel is that in some ways the Revolutionary War could have been avoided. It was an unnecessary war.

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely, and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

The real problem was that Washington had no plan to win the peace. (Jimmah’s been spending way too much time at the Burger King with Michael Moore.)

Advertisement

535 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 mglazer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:02:16pm

What a nutbag!

2 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:03:57pm

Jhimminy should be given a special Ignobel Prize in recognition of a lifetime of idiocy.

3 CrowScape  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:04:36pm

So... wait... if the BRITISH had been more reasonable, the revolution wouldn't have had to have been fought? Well DUH! By a similar line of thinking, if only those darn Nazis weren't so mean we wouldn't have had to deal with that D-Day thing.

4 NDMNTX  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:04:40pm

The man must just be getting more and more delusional as the days go by. What a, what a, ...dummycrat

5 zmb2  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:05:42pm

Just when you think people cant say anything dumber...along comes carter

6 Bill K.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:05:44pm

I say we stage a putsch and install Jimmy Carter as Idiotarian of the Year. It would fit his politics perfectly.

7 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:05:54pm

Oh, brother.

Why does Jimmy Carter hate the French?

/Not that there's anything wrong with that. I kid the French. ;-)

8 Maine's Michael  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:06:07pm

If, if, if. If you'd have had some judgement, we wouldn't be in this situation with Iran, you fruitloop.

Shut the fuck up and dissappear already.

Anyone got that excerpt from Mr. Hindsight's book about the tight pants?

9 Hhar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:06:14pm
more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought.

I'm no historian, but neither is Carter.

[Link: www.cwc.lsu.edu...]

10 Eric  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:06:23pm

I think Jimmah is beginning to show signs of dementia. This is just asinine( if it came from a sane man's mouth)

11 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:07:01pm

The Civil War was far bloodier, with WWII very close.

Idiot.

12 uvaprep  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:07:40pm

What kind of historian makes the claim that the Revolution was the bloodiest war that Americans have fought? Jimmy must have forgotten about the Late Unpleasantness that came near lil-ole Plains GA.

Carter needs to be sent on a permanent vacation to Iran, the paradise that he created.

13 wateshay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:07:44pm

... and had Saddam been a little more sensitive to our threats to blow his ass back to the stone age, the war in Iraq might have been avoided... or, if Al Qaeda had been a little more sensitive to our desire to keep the WTC towers and 3,000 American Citizens, the whole WoT might have been avoided.

Seriously, what's his point here? The Revolutionary war was fought because we weren't willing to put up with Britain walking all over us any more. Of course it could have been avoided if they hadn't walked all over us in the first place.

14 nimslight  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:08:42pm

did cater say that we can't win the cold war?

15 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:09:06pm

Hold off on that Boston tea party. In the name of peace and multilateralism, send Paul Revere, John Hancock, and Thomas Jefferson to have a parlay in London with that lunatic, George III.

16 loppyd  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:09:37pm

This chump, like Kerry would be in favor of a more "sensitive" war.

Pu-leeze! I'm cranky and especially fatigued by these fools today.

17 Yossarian  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:02pm

It was called the Olive Branch Petition and it didn't work.

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely, and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

Aww, he wishes the British Parliament had been a little more sensitive. Well, you know what? THEY WEREN'T. That's history.

Give me liberty or give me death!

18 nimslight  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:03pm

was that a typo?

19 Capt. Queeg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:05pm

I guess I comprehend what he's saying, but in his world could it be possible that we would still be trying to solve our differences with the British by "diplomacy" after 228 years? And, if so, if we went to war with them, say, next year, would it be a "rush to war"? These people take their own illusions about how the world works way too seriously. I won't even bother with the premise of Matthews original question.

20 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:13pm

If Jimmy Carter hadn't been president -

No invasion of Afghanistan, hence al-Qa'idah might have been substantially smaller

-No Islamist regime in Iran, therefore Hizbullah would not exist.

-No Sandinista regime in Nicaragua (11 years)

-Because of #2 and #3, no Iran-Contra

-No Robert Mugabe

-Andsoonsoonsoon

21 paxnhymn  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:18pm

yet another mindless comment from the president who brought us the misery index, double digit inflation, and the very begining of Islamofacism! He will go down as a peace advocate in the lll spun history books, instaed of the looser he is!!!


(spit!)

22 morganfrost  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:10:45pm

Carter has set himself the seemingly impossible goal of turning into a parody of himself. I think he may actually have clinched it with this interview...

23 Jmchez  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:11:24pm

He is right, and we would now be 4 or 5 different countries with no sense of patriotism at all (weak as it is now) because our freedom was not won but given as a dog gets a bone from its master.

How exactly did the Democrats go from Roosevelt and Truman to morons like Carter, Dukakis, Teddy K, Slick Willie and Kerry ?

How the hell did Carter get elected? It was his decisiion not to go to war against the Ayatollah in Iran for the sake of 21 lives or so that got thousands killed over this past 25 years. Even some of the hostages from 1979 have said that we should have declared war even if it had cost them their lives. Some principles are of a higher order.

24 agtiger  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:11:37pm

I'm left with my mouth hanging open, kinda like the AFLAC duck when confronted with Yogi Berra logic.

Non-violence and negotiations didn't work during the Iran Hostage Crisis, President Carter. They don't work now. The forces of darkness have handily caught on to the concept that a velvet fist inside of a velvet glove is pretty damned weak.

25 bolivar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:11:37pm

Jimmah, you are an arsehole and you use peanut shells to shit in. If they gave a prize for the dipshit of the year - you my friend would likely win it - no skerry might too but that is another story.

Suffice it to say that I never voted for this ass and never would have. His simplistic mind and thought patterns just boggle my noodle. He tries to breakdown conflicts like this into his simple minded babble and comes off looking like a rube and hick from the sticks which is all he will ever be. Thought there might actually be some good to come out of this asshat but, I was wrong...the senile old fool is sinking fast.

26 walstib  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:11:44pm

...and we could have be like Canada, India and Australia???

Oh joy!

(no offense to our Canadian, Indian or Autralian reraders, but really!)

27 BingoBunny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:12:11pm

Yep Carter needs a brain transplant.
maybe Clinton will volunteer when that husk he waddles arround in kicks off.

28 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:12:18pm
Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought.

Oh. My. G-d.

LOL

And this guy was President???

29 Oktober  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:12:45pm

last night he was on letterman. he said he was pissed that he didnt get a nobel prize when he was president because he thought he deserved one.

30 Parker in US  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:12:55pm

Carter no doubt was the worst president of my lifetime and I wish he would just dig a hole and crawl in it. I also fear that the Carter presidency was a preview to a Kerry presidency. Weak economy, weak military, weak president!!!

31 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:13:22pm

It's that damn George Washitler's fault!

32 Reagan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:13:22pm

Geez, what a distorted, nay ignorant outlook on our break with England. Does anyone here really think they would have given us what we wanted and we would have avoided war? Please don't insult us Jimmy. It was the British Empire and they weren't prepared in any way, shape or form to give us up at that time. We were valuable. They took our money, ie taxes, and didn't give a hellva lot in return and they weren't going to give up their money trough without a fight.

Someone please take the mike away. Mr. Carter shows more of his ignorance and his desired subserivance to totalitarian powers everyday. I guess in his world nothing is worth fighting or dying for. What in the hell did he learn in his time in the Navy? Did our armed forces teach him nothing? Not only are somethings worth dying for, they're worth killing for too. What's that old Patton quote? "The object of war isn't to die for your country it's to make the other poor bastard die for his."

We fight for what we believe in because that's who we are. Obviously Mr. Carter doesn't believe in that and we should encourage him to live where his views match the policy of his nation. May I suggest France. While they fought a revolution, their ass' has been run over several times since, They sure seem to have learned the lesson of appeasement Mr. Carter espouses.

33 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:07pm

What a moonbat.

I didn't watch it, but Jimmuh was on Late Night with David Letterman last night. Wonder how that went? Letterman also put Joe Wilson on when his book of lies came out.

I voted yesterday (first day of "early voting" in Texas). Straight GOP.

34 walstib  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:08pm

and to think that had there not been a backlash against Republicans after Nixon/Watergate, Jimbo would not have been president and today he'd be just another old farmer BS'ing this crap with Jed over at the feed store.

35 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:13pm

I find it amusing that Jhimminy would pick on one of the few, if not the only, revolutions that actually had positive results. I don't see him bad-mouthing Fidel's efforts, or suggesting that perhaps the Bolsheviks got it wrong. No, this gaseous windbag, this dispeptic fraud, is hot and bothered about a revolution devoted to the fundamantals of freedom and democracy.

Please, Jhimmah--do us all a favour and do something useful with your declining years. Write another dirty book or go build a house.

36 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:30pm

I know we can't have the same winner every year, but maybe there should be a lifetime idiotarian achievement award named in Jimmy's honor. The title gets pretty long, so maybe we could just call it: The Jimmy, sort of like the Emmy and the Oscar.

The Jimmy, for exceptional acheivement in idiotarian thought over many years, or some such.

37 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:48pm

I would love to get his take on the War of 1812. That's got to be a real doozy.

38 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:50pm

Two scumbags in one interview. First, Chris Matthews drawing parallels between our struggle for independence (fought by militia and regular troops against regular British troops) and the acts of terrorists in Iraq, many of whom aren't even Iragi. What to go Chris, you've swallowed the Michael Moore "minuteman" BS.

The second, of course, Dhimmi Jimmi -- Minimizing the accomplishments of our forefathers, declaring our fight to win independence as unnecessary and then saying how lovely and free we'd all have been had we waited, just like Canada. Just maybe if we hadn't shown the world we could throw off the yolk of tryanny, the Canadians, Indians and Aussies, along with us would be having tea time right now, with taxes on the tea.

Funny, I guess Carter fancies that if he were on the scene, he'd have convinced ol' King George and the Parliament to see it all our way, just like he did with Iran and the hostages or Korea and their nukes ... oops. The truth is that Carter never met a tyrant he didn't feel compelled to fawn all over. Carter in the Court of St. James in 1776? That would be the stuff of a Mel Brooks comedy.

The Revolutionary War was our most bloody? On what basis does he make that claim? By what standard?

Carter is a vain and bitter man.

39 nimslight  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:14:52pm

carter say people forget the france help us out!
did people forget the franch kill us troops in africa?

40 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:15:10pm

Die.Already.

41 levi from queens  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:15:25pm

28 RIP Ford -- the Civil War was far and away the bloodiest war we ever fought in terms of casualties as a percentage of the p[opulation and even total casualties (WWII may edge it out in total but with 5 times the population) Nam and Korea don't come close to say nothing of the 2 Gulf Wars. "Until recently" is the Civil War? Even in Georgia, I don't think the Civil War is recent today.

Sorry to rant pedantically.

42 perfectsense  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:15:43pm

...and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

Just 150 years later!

43 GW  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:18pm

#20
Aaaahh, the big trap. IF.
If John Kennedy hadn't gone to Dallas..
If Ron Reagan had won an Oscar...
If Hillary would've been servicing Bill he wouldn't have needed Monica...

not to defend Carter, I'm just saying.

44 Ringo the Gringo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:21pm

"...and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia..."

Who's to say that these countries would be free today if not for the example of the American Revolution and the US Constitution.

Was this idiot really president of the United States?

45 Model4  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:30pm
Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely

Yes, Mr. President, if the parties on both sides agree then war wouldn't be needed. Nor would Commanders-in-Chief.

However, as we discovered in your fetid presidency, international relations are seldom so easy. That's why we need real leaders who are willing to act when that's the best possible course to take. No wonder you're a disgrace, a shameful memory to even your party's faithful. Congratulations Dems, you've sunk so low nationally that even Carter is currently one of your luminaries.

46 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:35pm

#9 Hhar -

Oh, Lordy...it's even worse than I thought - he's off by a factor of OVER A HUNDRED when comparing the Revolutionary War to the Civil War and WWII. And not only is it not the deadliest war, it is the SECOND LEAST DEADLY war - only the War of 1812 had less deaths.

47 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:16:50pm

It seems Jhimmah is still getting and taking advice from Amy.

48 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:13pm

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't I learn in school that the 'Revolutionary War' almost had to be started by provocation (the Boston Tea Party) because England wouldn't let go? The colonials, finally fed up with being dictated to and after much negotiation and appeals to the then King George III, finally in desperation came up with the idea of provoking England by refusing to pay the newly hiked 'tea tax', mounted a raid on a frigate and tossed the unloaded tea into the harbor? They said they wouldn't pay the tax, obey England anymore and "take the tea and shove it up your jumper, England" and thereupon tossed the cargo into Boston Harbor.

49 gb  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:15pm

Apparently the Revolutionary War was the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.

50 Cam  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:26pm
and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

What a twat. The only reason Canada became independant without (much) bloodshed was because Queen Vic was smart enough to avoid another revolution and grant self governance in the colonies. Canada became independant because of the American Revolution, not in spite of it.

I am reminded of the Bart Simpson quote:

Ladies and Gentlemen, there is no such thing as a good war, with the following exceptions: The War of Independance, the Second World War, and the Star Wars trilogy.
51 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:27pm

Uhm, what's wrong with Canada, y'all?

Of course he could be wrong about the Revolutionary war. I remember what my Dad told me when I was just a tyke growing up in Canada.

He said that Canada got its independence from Britain because, unlike the US, Canada was a net drain on the British economy. Canada would have been happy to remain part of Britain, but they kicked us out.

Heh.

52 MichelefromLA  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:28pm

My friend, an older gentleman, who fled Iran due to a death threat put on his head by Khomeini says,

"Jimmy Carter is a stupid, stupid man! Nothing but a damn peanut farmer!"

53 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:50pm

You have to give Jimmah some credit for his long-term historical perspective.

one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought

Apparently for this Great Brain, 1861 is "recent".

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints

Hey, yeah, the parallel to the Iraq war is obvious. Had Saddam been just a little more sensitive to the complaints of the gassed Kurds...

54 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:17:58pm

Pacifism has shrivelled his already peanut-sized brain.

55 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:18:09pm

This has gotta be the dumbest fucking person I have never met

56 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:18:38pm

I think Gerald Ford is feeling a little less silly about his "Eastern Europe is independent and autonomous" remark in the 1976 debate.

57 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:18:40pm

Why can't a past winner recieve the award?

58 BeckoningChasm  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:19:20pm

But this is astonishing news! I can't believe the import of this, that we should be alive in this day and age to witness such sights.

I mean, I had no idea medical science was so advanced that it could keep a man, Jimmy Carter, alive whose brain has been entirely removed.

Congratulations to the Umbrella Corporation for this triumph.

59 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:19:24pm

Why even the sacking of Rome was entirely unnecessary. If only the Romans had negotiated with the Ostrogoths a little longer, they could have come to a mutually acceptable agreement and avoided all the bloodshed. For example, the Romans could have agreed to all commit suicide by poisoning themselves, thereby making the cleanup of the corpses much less messy.

60 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:19:53pm

#55 grayp

LOL

61 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:19:58pm

The only thing Carter is right about, is that the Revolutionary War was deadlier than the Iraq War.

62 Evil Bill  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:20:42pm

When ex-Prez Jimmy C, says Canada is a free country he is wrong. It is a dictatorship run by the Liberals. I don't think Americans would tolerate a government like the one we have up here.

63 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:21:04pm
Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive

That is fuc*ing it...the Democratic Party...until they clean house...are no more, gone, bye-bye, adios, frickin' nutjobs.

64 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:21:13pm

I think when Matthews interviews el cubos like Carter his show should be called Softball.

65 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:21:43pm

#52 MichelefromLA

I also have a good friend from Iran. I remember a conversation I had with him once went a little like this.

ME: So, wouldn't you like to go back and visit Iran?
Iranian: No, they will kill me if I go back.
ME: OH! why would they kill you?
Iranian: Because I'm jewish.

66 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:21:55pm

I have a feeling that my Dad was an wrong about Canada not being profitable for England though, lots of raw material in Canada... Sounds like the sort of conspiracy thinking a liberal arts prof like him would believe though - there an assumption that there's a profit motive behind everything.

67 Robert Crawford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:01pm

And this guy was President???

Not really. He held the office, but he wasn't president.

68 StreetCafe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:05pm

If you can stand to keep scrolling down the link, Matthews later interviews Ron Suskind, who elaborates on his Bush hit piece from the NYT Magazine.

What a disgusting show that must've been, from beginning to end.

69 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:24pm

Carter has lost it. Hardball is not far behind. Will somebody please tell me what the hell is going on?

And it's still a dead heat? Saints preserve us!

Al

70 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:25pm

King George should have been more sensitive. How did this guy get to be Pres?

71 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:29pm

By the way, folks, let's take a moment out from our dogpilin' on Jimmah to note that in the question, Chris Matthews seems to be inviting a comparison between the Iraqi jihadists and the Minutemen.

72 paxnhymn  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:22:42pm

25 bolivar

at least the hicks from the sticks have some common since...all Jimmuh has left is the accent!!!


24agtiger

you have a point. Jimmy Carter, the president who created the Iran hostage crisis, should know better than anyone that you can't negotiate with islamofacists(I don't even capitalize it now...makes it look illegitimate!)!!He is the quinessential definition of crazy...

Doing the same thing over & over again, expecting different results

Hey! come to think of it...all Democrats must be crazy!!

73 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:23:13pm

Whoops, #38 Studsup already preempted my post #71.

74 shan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:23:28pm

I'm sure Ben Franklin would be shocked by this. Didn't he try and try and try to negotiate a peaceful transaction to independence? He gave up, went back to Boston, and helped with the Constitutional Congress and the Declaration. If I've read my history correctly (Thank you very much Jeff Shaara!), the Revolutionary War didn't start in a split second: it took time!

What a maroon! Thank God I was too young to know what was going on but I did know a good song from back then. You know, the Oscar Meyer Weiner tune:

My President has a first name. It's J-I-M-M-Y.
My President has a second name. It's C-A-R-T-E-R.

Does anyone else know the rest of this? I just remember something about peanuts and the USA!

75 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:23:44pm

#62 Evil Bill

I like Canada (except for the weather). I like the US as well. As a jew, I feel more accepted in Canada than I did in Australia.

76 Son of a Pig and a Monkey  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:23:50pm

Uhh, Jhimmi's from Georgia, right?

I guess he forgot about the "March to the Sea".

77 Andrew B.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:23:54pm

WTF is this guy talking about???

What a moron.

78 Grantman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:02pm

OH MY GOD. How thick can this man be???

79 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:28pm

#36 a.k.a. Will

I had the same idea.

I think another parallel is that in some ways the Revolutionary War could have been avoided. It was an unnecessary war.

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely, and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing he's ever said. No offense But I don't want America to be just like Canada, Australia, or INDIA?!

I'm proud of our revolutionary history. I'm proud of the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence - neither of which would exist now if it weren't for that "unnecessary war".

Dhimmi Carter is a fucking asshole and an idiot if he'd throw away our history.

80 Cole Slaw  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:33pm

Anything, in the long run, could be avoided Jimmah, since, in the long run, we are all dead.

81 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:42pm

OT - A Hollywood liberal sees the light. (via Drudge)

82 armytramp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:24:43pm

If only King George had had sensitivity training! I hear it was all the vogue in 1776.

I'm glad he said this doinky stuff. Haven't laughed so hard in days.

What
An
Idiot.

Maybe he's going senile, not that he had much mind to lose...

83 moonsbreath  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:02pm

That's right Jimma, the Revolutionary War was the bloodiest and historians say the Civil War was. Some say Arrafat is a terrorist and you call him friend. And so it goes...

84 David Simon  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:14pm

Yeah Jimmy, confiscatory tariffs, like terrorism, are but a nuisance.

85 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:42pm

What you're witnessing here is the LLL philosophy in full blossom. The stench is absolutely amazing.

I wonder when he is going to ask us apologize to Britain?

86 Cam  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:54pm

#66 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar:

Your Dad was correct to a degree. One of the ways that Britain encouraged the settling of the Canadas was by offering free land and zero taxation. That said, Britain felt it neccessary to have a significant population on the U.S.'s doorstep, and thus maintained a (somewhat) significant garrison here. On the whole, the colonies may have been a net loss for the British, but in the strategic sense, it was considered an important military outpost.

87 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:25:55pm

PINMF!

88 Jim in Virginia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:26:09pm

Dementia is a very sad thing to witness.
(Or can anyone give me another explanation for this?)

89 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:26:47pm
And it was an ill-advised abuse and misunderstanding from London of the colonials that caused them one by one to renounce that oath and take up weapons against our own king.

Well, that speaks volumes. You "bend-over-backwards-and-screw-America" as*hole.

90 BIG  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:26:51pm

Civil War? Don't get me started on the Civil war.

Our President lied! He said the war was to preserve the union and what does he do? Free the slaves? WTF? Here we go to war and the leader of our nation lied to us? Lincoln lied and 650,000 died!

During the hotly contested elections of 1864, Democratic challenger Geroge McClellan (a decorated general best known for organized retreats) said that he would get us out of the war by simply appeasing the Southern States by getting rid of this emancipation crap. Why should we die for slaves? Why should these people be free?

Isn't it amazing that 140 years later, the Democrats still haven't changed their positions?

91 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:27:25pm

#70 Bob with one O

How did this guy get to be Pres?

Because Nixon came before him and people wanted someone innocent.

92 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:27:39pm

What was Carter's reaction to the Indonesian genocide in E. Timor?

93 ibu guru  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:27:48pm

Isn't it time Carter was confined to home with his Alzheimer's? Or could he really be so incredibly stoo-ooo-pid-d-d-d-d?

Can't believe I voted for him against the man who fell out of airplanes. Perhaps I can use the "dumb kid" excuse for that, but he can't!

94 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:27:51pm

#90 BIG

Lincold lied; people died.

95 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:28:08pm

#63 RWC


"That is fuc*ing it...the Democratic Party...until they clean house...are no more, gone, bye-bye, adios, frickin' nutjobs.


Don't do that to me. I really can't LOL like that. It hurts my back.

Al

96 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:28:25pm

If only the Confederacy had been a little more sensitive to the slaves.

If only Hitler had been a little more sensitive to the Allies.

If only the North Koreans had been a little more sensitive to the South Koreans.

97 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:28:45pm

#48 foreign devil

And we're a coffee-drinking nation to this day, thank heaven. :)

98 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:29:14pm

Let's turn the argument around the way it should be:

The Holocaust would have been unnecessary if Chamberlain and Stalin had not negotiated with Hitler and just gone in and kicked his ass in 1938.

It's the negotiations that lead to the disasters. War -- and the threat of war -- is what keeps the bad guys in line. Evil men and those with ill-intentions use talk to their advantage. Jimmy, John and their ilk still don't realize that, for reasons I can't fathom.

99 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:29:15pm

I think he's making the point that the war can be won (sometimes, not all) without firing a shot.'

i.e. The Cold War, Libya, hopefully red-China!! Vietnam was a massive military failure, proving that 'solution' does not always work.

Sometimes the change has to come from within, like in Russia's case with glasnost.

In the US Civil War period, it has been argued that slavery would have ended on its own in due course, as the world moved toward the industrial age. And the US vs. US carnage and deaths could have been avoided.

If Canada gained independence without a war, it's likely the US would have gained the same, so I agree with Carter.

There are voices of democracy and reform in Iran. They will be heard at some point. It's not up to us to try to impose laws on them. That just makes them unify instead and hate the US/Israel axis.

100 Pope Insouciance IV  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:30:37pm

It's hard to know where to begin with this nitwit.
But if there is a photo of Carter, Michael Moore, and John Kerry at the DNC convention, the RNC should use it as a still picture in their next ad.

Just that picture on the screen for 30 seconds.

101 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:30:54pm

#92 Jonny:

What was Carter's reaction to the Indonesian genocide in E. Timor?

He described it as "insensitive", I think.

102 flehman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:30:58pm

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive


What PC hog wash is that? He has lost his marbles. I guess that goes to show you how Anti America he is, He wishes the US had not even started.

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive

103 SoCalJustice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:01pm

OT

Simon Tisdall putting the al in al-Guardian:

Bush and Kerry dance to the tune of Ariel Sharon

104 moonsbreath  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:13pm

I was a teenager when he was governor of Georgia...sadly he wasn't much different.

105 Sleepy Jesus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:19pm

Crack kills, Jimmy!

106 flehman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:35pm

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive


Garbage!


Fritz's Thoughts

107 danightman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:35pm

#76

We're still wishing he would march to the sea.

If anyone here is old enough to have voted for Jimmeh, I have one question to ask: exactly why did anyone ever think this crackpot was Presidential material?

108 BIG  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:31:50pm

#94 scaramouche

I actually did a much longer rant about the 1864 elections on another blog. I'll have to go find it and post it here. It's scary how history keeps repeating itself.

109 Duder  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:32:12pm

OT:

Mark Hyman from Sinclair compared Dems against "Stolen Honor" to holocaust deniers.

This is news. I can't change the fact that these people decided to come forward today. The networks had this opportunity over a month ago to speak with these people. They chose to suppress them. They chose to ignore them. They are acting like Holocaust deniers, pretending these men don't exist.

Here: [Link: transcripts.cnn.com...]

However, the Jewish ADL wasn't too happy about that:
[Link: www.adl.org...]

110 wateshay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:32:34pm

Oh, I get it... he's trying to make a parallel between Britain in 1776 and the US in 2003... and since he's "right", there's no reason for facts to get in the way of his argument. Never mind that little thing where Britain was enforcing a tyranny, and we were freeing the Iraqis from one.

111 Capt. Queeg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:03pm

#99 NBK062 wrote:

I think he's making the point that the war can be won (sometimes, not all) without firing a shot. i.e. The Cold War,

That is one ignorant statement.

112 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:08pm

#81 scaramouche

If you want to see Hollywood liberals get a dose of anti-idiotarianism go and see "Team America*".

*if you're not put off by the kind of vulgarity often displayed on south park.

113 Slim  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:09pm

Nothing worth fighting for, nothing worth killing for, nothing worth dying form, right Jimmy? Just gotta sit down at Camp David and work it all out.

114 The Cyber Menace  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:14pm

It really is an amazing admission for someone who once led America. I saw some of this in the things he has said in the past, especially when he came out with a novel about the Revolutionary War. But I never expected him to be this open about his doubts concerning America's creation.

Think about it. He prefers America to be more like Canada and India. Then the left cringes when you bring up words like "global test". The American left's distaste for what America now is I think is exposed by comments like those made by Jimmy Carter.

Hey, I'm Canadian. I love Canada. Don't want it to be America. Just as I would assume that most good American patriots wouldn't want America to be Canada.

What a stunning remark coming from Jimmy Carter.

[Link: cybermenace.blogspot.com...]

115 JohnSteele  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:23pm

I think Rosaline forgot to give Jimmmah his meds this morning...

116 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:46pm

Now I see why those "I'm With Stupid" t-shirts were so popular in the late 1970s.

117 Cam  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:48pm

#99 NBK062:

Canada wsa peacefully granted limited independance because the Queen at the time was a mite bit smarter than Mad King George and she'd learned her lesson from the American Revolution. Thus, it is unlikely that Canada would have had such a peaceful transition had the Revolution occured.

We had a couple of minor revolutions as well, but they tended more to the drunken rioting kind of revolution, rather than the militarily organized type.

118 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:33:49pm

#103 SCJ; from your link--

It was Israel that, as far back as 1967, perfected the concept of pre-emptive war.


AHHH [restraining urge to claw my own eyes out]

119 BeckoningChasm  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:34:34pm

#107 If anyone here is old enough to have voted for Jimmeh, I have one question to ask: exactly why did anyone ever think this crackpot was Presidential material?

I was old enough to vote for Jimmah, but I didn't. I voted for Ford. I think Ford suffered because of the Nixon connection, and the press portrayal of him as an idiot. So I can understand why some folks thought, well, time for a change. Pity the change was for the worse.

120 moonsbreath  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:34:45pm

#107 danightman

I turned 18 in 1976 and the kids in high school said they were going to vote for Jimma because he promised to legalize pot.

121 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:34:58pm

{still floored by this assmunch's statement}

Unbelievable.

122 lewisge  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:35:24pm

Just when I thought I had heard it all from the looney left... I... I... BRAIN FREEZE !!!

123 Atlas Wannabe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:35:26pm

One word: Dementia

124 Jim in Virginia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:35:44pm

99 did you miss a sarcasm tag?
Libya turned around because of what we were about to do in Iraq. Qaddafi did not suddenly see the light, he didn't want to wind up in a spider hole.

"War is not the answer." Well, it depends on what the question is.

125 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:36:36pm

Carter is showing signs of dementia. I don't think I'll say anything mean. If I had a microphone I would not put it in front of his face. The obviously false statement about the Revolutionary War is only one sign his grip on reality has become tenuous at best.

126 Son of a Pig and a Monkey  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:36:50pm

Hey Jhimmuh,

If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle!

127 moonsbreath  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:06pm

What do you expect from someone (Jimma) who swore he saw a killer rabbit?

128 Jonny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:42pm

#99 NBK062 wrote:

I think he's making the point that the war can be won (sometimes, not all) without firing a shot. i.e. The Cold War,

Yes, this is valid, since England and America had a policy of Mutually Assured Destruction (back in 1776), the revolutionary war would have been won without firing a shot.

In 1788, under an arms reduction treaty, the Americans and the British both destroyed all their nuclear weapons, but scrambled to rebuild them when they learnt that nazi germany was working on one.

/yeah right!

129 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:45pm

#95 Al di Grandpa

Sorry my friend. But, it could be taken as a joke, but if sh*tbrick Kerry wins, prepare for a long, long, long term...

"Terrorism is a nuisance"

130 Quimmelton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:46pm

God, he sounds like Reagan used to.

131 Jim in Virginia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:37:57pm

118 Occasional reader- didn't Israel pass on a pre emptive war in 1973- and nearly lose because of it?

132 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:39:24pm

Our next Secretary of State...sigh...

Or UN Ambassador...

On the other hand, if Bush does win, and Kofi gets dragged down any further by the Oil-for-Fraud investigation, Jimmuh just might wind up as Secretary General.

Oopps, that had a sudden laxative effect on me...gotta go...

133 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:40:48pm

#130 Quimmelton

Buzz off.

134 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:40:49pm

#111

Last time I checked NATO did not invade the USSR to bring an end to Communism. Lech Walesa, Pope JPII, Reagan, Gorby, and many many others contributed to the fall. Most of the change was initiated from within. The day the Berlin Wall fell, it caught everyone by surprise, and no shots were fired.

These aren't FACTS? There was an invasion that day?

135 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:41:14pm

Jimmy's right -- we should have achieved our independence the way India did: live for 100 years under servitude, and then see 1 million people killed in a partition of the country! (In our case it would have been North/South). Brilliant.

Oh yes, that good ol' nonviolence works every time.

136 big L  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:41:23pm

You should read what the treatments were that King George got for his ailments.
He didn't speak much, if any English language. He spoke German.
The colonists did petition the Crown for their grievances. Ignorred.

Jimmah's answers might indicate a tad of Alzheimers coming on. My family member was afflicted and could come up with some bizarre scenarios.

I think Chris Mathews is looking for job as Kerry Press Secretary.
my two cents

137 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:41:36pm

This is Carter's take on the hostage crisis:

They made a serious mistake which brought catastrophe on their country, and Iran has never recovered its international prestige and its influence that they lost during that ill-advised experience.


What can you say? Nobody would agree with this assessment outside of the voices in his head.

138 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:41:43pm

#130:

God, he sounds like Reagan used to.

You mean, when he said unsophisticated, non-nuanced things like, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall"?

Say, have you seen the Berlin Wall lately?

FOAD.

139 Jim in Virginia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:41:58pm

107 danightman- Jimmah was the first of the "I'm not from Washington and we need an outsider" (because insiders brought you Watergate, Vietnam, inflation, etc.)
His best quote- " in a democracy people get the government they deserve." Hunter S. Thompson said he figured Carter was right on that one.

140 Galactic Jello  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:42:56pm
Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought.

Numbers Killed in Action:

Revolutionary War: 4,435

Korean War: 33,651
Vietnam War: 47,369
World War I: 53,513
Civil War: 184,594
World War II: 292,131

141 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:42:57pm

#130 Quimmelton

Care to explain that, or was it just a poop-and-run?

142 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:43:16pm

#99 NBK062

Actually, Iran is the one place in the middle east (not counting Israel) where a significant minority of the population loves the United States. Why? Because we're their government's official enemy, and because they hate their own government.

If we made an alliance with the Iranian goverment that would make "them unify instead and hate the US/Israel axis."

Anyway our current worry is that a Nuclear armed Iran will make good on (former Iranian President) Rafsanjani's promise to use their nukes on Israel as soon as they got them. The most likely scenario being that they'd secretly hand them over to terrorists (such as Hezbolla) and not take credit for the ensuing slaughter.

As for freedom eventually coming automatically to a fascist state, all I can say is that this sounds self-deluding wishful thinking. You might wish that a fascist state will automatically evolve, but there's hardly reason to believe that it will - rather it will find enemies, and keep wars going to destract it's people forever. Thus, jihad, terrorism and Israel...

143 Crapulentis_Sum  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:43:40pm

Djimmy Carter:

Dumbest. President. Ever...

144 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:44:08pm

#134 NBK062:

Last time I checked NATO did not invade the USSR to bring an end to Communism.

Last time I checked, just a few shots were fired along the way in the Korean peninsula, former French Indochina, Central America...

The Cold War was not won by "sensitivity".

145 scaramouche  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:44:48pm

#108 BIG

It's scary how history keeps repeating itself.

Yup. I've been reading recently about all the Jews in FDR's administration and how they convinced him to go to war.

#112 Jonny

While I applaud any effort to skewer the pretentions of Hollywood leftists, I think the ability to sit through South Park and other stuff engendered by those guys is determined primarily by gender: us chicks just can't seem to do it.

146 tgibbs  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:45:02pm
Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely, and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.

I don't see anything particularly outrageous. Of course the British could have avoided the war, if they had been a bit smarter. If they had been more conciliatory toward the colonies, they probably could have postponed independence for years by dribbling out concessions. But Britain was a superpower for that era, so it is easy to see how they could thought they could push around a bunch of colonists, and underestimated the difficulty of fighting such a war. They probably had to get whipped to realize that such an approach was doomed to failure.

147 Smartalice  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:45:20pm

#20 Frank:
Damn. Carter was the wrong man at the wrong time. Bar none. Damn.

148 Quimmelton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:45:27pm

#138 Occasional Reader

More like "I don't recall."

Look, there comes a certain age when people start losing it. Carter is obviously well past it and Reagan was getting there, I remember '87, not exactly in his prime there.

149 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:45:56pm
#143 Crapulentis_Sum 
Djimmy Carter:
Dumbest. President. Ever...

I'm not so sure about that one. Andrew Johnson and Herbert Hoover might give him a run for his money. Let's just say he's definitely in the top five.

150 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:13pm

Thom #79

Dhimmi Carter is a fucking asshole and an idiot if he'd throw away our history.

I've only voted for one Democrat for president ever, and I'm not admitting which one.

There is a lot of merit to a Lifetime Achievement Award, or The Jimmy. There are some who are consisitently idiotarian year-after-year, but never mange to rise to the top. Then there's Jimmy who'd win every year if not for the no repeat winners rule.

151 Rich K  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:28pm

So now Jimmy Carter is applying Political Correctness to our History and letting the hilarity ensue!

Perhaps if Hitler was more sensitive then World War II would have been unnecessary too.

152 The Monster  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:38pm
and of course now we would have been a free country now as is Canada and India and Australia, having gotten our independence in a nonviolent way.


Precisely because we demonstrated that the British couldn't field an army across the Atlantic to defend the Colonies, it was pretty darned obvious that they couldn't do so across the Pacific or the Himalayas. The Brits knew it, the colonies knew it, and they dealt with it.

Our revolution, in varying degrees, won those countries their independence in the same way that OIF won the immediate, unconditional cessation and renunciation of WMD programs by Libya. Occasionally, an example must be made, "pour l'encouragement de d'autres". There. Even Kerry ought to be able to understand that.

153 Model4  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:46:53pm

#88 Jim in Virginia:

Dementia is a very sad thing to witness.
(Or can anyone give me another explanation for this?)

Liberalism. See post #99. There isn't a tyrant or a tyranny liberals won't protect from the threats of freedom, democracy and human rights.

154 Asylum Aleikum  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:47:13pm
...do you see any parallels between the fighting that we did on our side and the fighting that is going on in Iraq today?

Who is more retarded, Carter who believes that the Revolutionary War was unnecessary, or Matthew who invites a comparison between islamofascists and the Minutemen?!?

155 Capt. Queeg  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:48:05pm

#134 NBK062

Your stupidity is appalling. The history of the Cold War is one of a series of proxy wars between the West and the Soviet Union and China. Thousands upon thousands died and many "shots were fired". That the Cold War ended without some kind of invasion of Russia is meaningless.

156 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:48:54pm

just want to save my name here. test...

157 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:49:22pm

#74 Shan -- "I'm sure Ben Franklin would be shocked by this. "

Ben Franklin? Can you imagine John Adams?!

Well, in God's own good time, Jimmy will get to meet his 72 Virginians. :-)

158 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:49:31pm

#148:

I remember '87

I do, too. And that's when he said "tear down this wall". June 12, to be exact.

159 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:50:16pm

#142 "Actually, Iran is the one place in the middle east (not counting Israel) where a significant minority of the population loves the United States. Why? Because we're their government's official enemy, and because they hate their own government."

This sounds dangerous. Are they going to welcome us with flowers too? Nobody wants Whitey to come in and impose laws, which is what the US tried to accomplish in Vietnam and there are paralells in Iraq.

That Iran population that may love the US of A, will rally around their kin if invaded. So it seems we should support the Iranians that want democracy in the same way we handled the Cold War. An invasion will turn moderates against us. That is what Iraq has proven.

And change will have to come from within, not be imposed. The USA cannot expect to just work over militarily 500 million Middle Easterners and have everything be rosy. It cannot work, not to mention the cost $$$.

160 CrowScape  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:50:28pm

#99

Vietnam was not a military failure, it was a political one. Our military won every single battle that was asked of it. The Tet Offensive was an utter military disaster for the Vietcong. If the politics were left out of it and our troops were allowed to move into the North, Vietnam would have been a happy democratic state today and a million civilians wouldn't have been slaughtered in Laos and Cambodia, plus we wouldn't have all these damned LLLs screaming "Vietnam! Vietnam" whenever the US gets involved in a war.

161 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:50:52pm

#155 Capt. Queeg

The history of the Cold War is one of a series of proxy wars between the West and the Soviet Union and China. Thousands upon thousands died and many "shots were fired".

Korea and Vietnam immediately come to mind.

162 Son of Semper Fi  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:52:24pm

CARTER: Well, I think almost any reasonable person who knew history would say that you can‘t go into an alien environment and force by rule of arms by forcing the people to adopt a strange concept.

What about Germany and Japan after WWII ... I can't believe that Jimmy is a historian let alone a former President ... please send stem cells to Plaines, GA

163 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:52:34pm

Whoops, I see Occasional Reader covered the Korea/Vietnam/Cold War example. Sorry.

164 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:52:36pm

#150 a.k.a. Will

I can even picture the prize (drawn by C&F of course):

One of those big hockey type cups in the shape of Dhimmi's grinning countenance, perhaps with the texture of a peanut shell. Inscription:

Dhimmi Carter Award for Lifetime Idiotarian Achievement

165 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:52:53pm

#153 Model4

And what do you call hawkish liberalism? I know it seems like pacifism is part of the dogma these days, but pacifism sounds to me like NEW stupidity, it can't always have been a invarient fixture of all liberal thought.

You know, there are no useful schools of thought if you let each concept and each movment be defined by idiots.

166 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:53:10pm

#128 Jonny

LOL. That was a nice fact bomb you just dropped there.

Our letter-number combo also said this:

Most of the change was initiated from within.

I'm not even sure what that means. I know that Reagan scared the crap out of the Soviets. The hardline Soviet generals who said a nuclear war could be won were marginalized.

167 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:53:26pm

I like this quote from the Carlin interview talking about his book entitled ("When will Jesus Bring In the Pork Chops?"):


CARLIN: It doesn‘t mean anything in particular. What I like about it is that it offends all three major religions around the world and in addition to the vegetarians.

Hahahaha, George, that's so f**king clever. When did you stop being funny???

168 jjag  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:54:07pm

Jimmy Carter was the John Kerry of his time.

No one really knew anything about him, they didn't look very hard. All anyone knew was one thing; he didn't have any apparent scandals about him.

Post Nixon, that was good enough for just enough voters.

Kerry? No one knew him. He runs as a "war hero" who might appeal to people who perceive the incumbant a failure in that regard. Like Carter, his hope is that the mere symbolism will suffice.

169 Quimmelton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:54:36pm

#158 Occasional Reader

"Facts are stupid things" -Reagan, 1988 misquoting John Adams who said "Facts are stubborn things"

170 baybuny  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:54:52pm

OT

Have any of you seen this "progressive" movement to swap nader/3rd party votes in decided states for kerry votes in battleground states???

www.votepair.org

is there any level they will not stoop to?

maybe all of the LGF'ers in battleground states ought to go on over and pledge their votes to kerry. stop up their system...

unbelievable! how can this even be legal??

171 TotallySirius  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:56:20pm

Jimmuh must be getting into Algore's meds.

What's with that crap about turning against "our king"?

Americans bow to no king!

172 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:56:24pm

#169:

Oh my GOD! I had forgotten that Reagan misquoted John Adams by one word! Yep, that's clearly evidence of advanced dementia.

/sarcasm

173 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:56:33pm

From yesterday's thread - #276

RE: 'Ol Jimmy the Ignorant

You only had to live through his administration to realize how ignorant and DANGEROUS he was.

My fav. Chapter about him was in Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country .

After the CIA and the NSA had to get out globes and maps to show 'Ol Jimmy where countries were, and after floundering for months, Bert Lance indicted for Bank Fraud back in Atlanta and resigned the cabinet,
he abandons the Shah to Khomeini followers, AND fires his whole cabinet in one night. SH___T ! Wall Street Freaked within weeks average home mortgage rates were over 15% and Bank Prime lending rates to their best customers hit 21%.

We got a new economic phrase thanks to 'Ol Jimmy "StagFlation" e.g. stagnant economy with high double digit inflation. BTW 'Ol Jimmy HATED Paul Volker, but Wall Street convinced Jimmy that unless he appointed Volker, Fed. Chairman, game over.

Considering the work he's been doing since 1999 shilling for Gore then the LLL underground, now this, he should be given cognative tests every 90 days for Alzheimers.
___

#276 Brian Hoitt

Brian Mathews is a narcissist. Just another entertainer selling adult diapers, beer and apparently 'Ol Jimmy's lame book.

Since when do expect narcissistic entertainers to know anything beyond Jr. High History, and NOT shill for Kedwards ?

174 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:56:41pm

CARTER: Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought.


Horse Hockey!!!

If that is what his idea of being a historian is about, he might just want to look at little known thing that happened...oh like 1861-1865, to the tune of about 620,000 casualties!

The Revolutionary War is no where near that. His history is just like his politics...Bass ackwards!

175 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:57:01pm

#107 danightman -- "If anyone here is old enough to have voted for Jimmeh, I have one question to ask: exactly why did anyone ever think this crackpot was Presidential material?"

I admit to voting for Carter in his first term and I was a Republican. I did so because I felt that Nixon, despite his accomplishments, had shamed the Party and the Presidency with Watergate and the subsequent coverup. I wanted all the Haldeman's, Erlichman's and Dean's embedded in government swept clean. My only regret is that the same soiling of the Whitehouse and worse occured under Clinton, and the scumbag's minions are still soiling the government. If the Dems cared as much about the integrity of Government, guys like Joe Wilson and Sandy Berger would be doing time instead of getting airtime.

176 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:57:30pm

#125 Beagle

The obviously false statement about the Revolutionary War is only one sign his grip on reality has become tenuous at best.

Hi Beagle! How are the pups? Molly sends kisses.

But you're wrong on this one. If the man didn't have a history of uttering lunacies, I might give you the point. But he does and it's a long one. And every one comes from moral vanity. Carter suffers from the stupidity of the truly arrogant.

So, that does raise a question: If and when dementia sets in, how would we know? (Stolen from my thought experiment "When Keith Richards dies, how will we tell?")

177 security mofo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:58:20pm

will someone please wake me up from this nightmare...

178 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:58:32pm

Jimmy Carter: Worst President of the 20th century; worst ex-President of the 21st. Idiotarian emeritus.

Had the English Parliament been a little more sensitive...

Unfortunately classes in "sensitivity training" were not available in the 18th century.

The Revolutionary War, more than any war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we've fought.

This comment can't stand up to any criticism, but is Carter actually comparing the American Revolution to the war in Iraq? Probably, after all, he did sit with Michael al-Moore during the Democrat convention and al-Moore is on record comparing Iraqi terrorists to the Minutemen.

179 Evolutions Eve  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:58:41pm

Apologize, George W. Bush!!!

Apologize for fighting an unwinable war. Apologize for failing to win that unwinable war before the All-Star break. Apologize for fighting the insurgents too aggressively, and apologize for showing them too much mercy. Apologize for forcing democracy and freedom upon the mere 85% of Iraqis who desire them. Apologize for ignoring the thoughtful and nuanced objections of some civilian-bombing terrorists in the Sunni Triangle. Apologize for not sending enough troops and apologize for taking too many troops away from their homes and families. Apologize for…oh, apologize for something. It really doesn't matter what. Just admit that you were wrong about something important. It's ever so much easier to defeat your arguments when you concede them to us first.


Apologize, George W. Bush, because there's something delicious about watching righteous men eat their words. You won't be so quick to dismiss nuances and overtones and penumbras when you have a shame-faced apology sticking in your craw. And when we've neutralized your moralizing tone, it will be vastly easier to neutralize the popular, we're-the-good-guys morality that you propound. Oh, we could take the high road, of course, and praise an apology as a dignified gesture that will help to heal the bitter divisions in our society. But we won't. Your apology will be reduced to a lurid sound-bite on some vicious DNC advertisement that mocks your confident faith and uncompromising principles. And let's not even think about how America's enemies will use your apology to undermine your credibility. Get used to the smell of your apology, George W. Bush. It will be rubbed in your nose until the day you die.

Apologize, George W. Bush, even though official apologies are invariably useless. When a government official "apologizes" and "takes full responsibility," you can be certain that the official isn't sorry, and plans on doing nothing. Bill Clinton apologized for slavery -- not that it made a difference to anyone, anywhere. Janet Reno took full responsibility for the Waco debacle -- not that she or anyone else lost their job over it. Apologies don't bring the dead back to life, and they don't fix failed policies. In wartime particularly, it's better to actually change flawed policies than to engage in the ritualized Kabuki theater of apologies and lamentations and public self-flagellation. It would be enlightening to examine whether the Bush administration has, in fact, changed its policies when they have proven unsuccessful. But such an examination isn't as much fun as demanding public repentance.

Apologize, George W. Bush, although wartime presidents never do. Roosevelt didn't apologize. Truman didn't apologize. Neither did Eisenhower, Johnson, Kennedy, or Nixon. Every wartime president has made mistakes -- sometimes ghastly mistakes that cost the lives of soldiers and civilians. But no one ever demanded apologies from those presidents, perhaps because Americans used to understand that war is an inherently chaotic and unpredictable thing in which awful mistakes will always be made.

180 skwired  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:58:47pm

the ONLY vote I would cast in Jimmy Carter's favor is for idiot of the year. Keep to building houses and growing peanuts, Jimmy.

181 Model4  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:59:07pm

#162 Son of Semper Fi: Shhh... NBK062 said that couldn't happened, so it must not have. He's already played the race card, already played the Yahoodi card... I'm curious to see where this goes.

182 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:59:46pm

Aaaargh...sorry Charles. Sorry everyone. I did not mean to cut&paste that much of it. :-(

183 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 12:59:51pm

NBK062 sounds familiar. I'm thinking it's a previously banned troll. They all sound so much alike with their generic talking points. It's giving us lessons on the Iraq experience now. How much do you want to bet it's never read an Iraqi blog?

184 DANEgerus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:00:45pm

So the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the United States Constitution... our entire Republic... is the result of an "unnecessary war" because just 175 years later Britain woulda let us be on our way...

This from the worst President of the United States in the history of our country... the supreme (D)... the man whose NorthKorean appeasement may yet result in a nuclear weapons exchange and whose Iranian appeasement gave us the very Islamci "republic" building nuclear weapons while supporting terrorism world wide.

185 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:00:48pm

#99

You are correct about the US military winning the battles, and Tet being a desperate move by the enemy.

I dunno about the populace though. We had years to convince the people of the South and we never even accomplished that, let alone the North too.

Our soldiers did even know which citizens in the South were for or against us.

The majority of the Vietnamese people just wanted Whitey gone, whether French or USA. Iraq is no different at this point.

186 traveler  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:01:03pm

Hey Everybody! Summer's Eve is Back!!!

Hit the tip jar!

187 DANEgerus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:01:39pm

"The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not "insurgents" or "terrorists" or "The Enemy." They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow -- and they will win." -- Michael Mhore

188 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:02:22pm
The Revolutionary War Was "Unnecessary"

People, people, people you must remember... This war, The Revolutionary war, would not have passed the, "Global Test"

189 stefania  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:02:55pm

Still a minority, but good news:

Italian Blogs for Bush

190 tgibbs  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:07pm

#38 studsup

Minimizing the accomplishments of our forefathers, declaring our fight to win independence as unnecessary

How does pointing out the rather obvious fact that the war was a mistake on the part of the British minimize the accomplishments of our forefathers? Of course the British made a mistake! They lost! When you lose a war, it generally means that you made a mistake--either you made a mistake in the way you fought the war, or you made a mistake by thinking that you had a chance of winning in the first place.

The fact that the British screwed up by trying to put down the Revolution instead of offering concessions does not in any way minimize the achievements of our Revolutionary War heroes. Yes, the British almost certainly could have avoided the war. Most colonists started out loyal to Britain, and were reluctant to fight a country to which they still had ties. But even if they could have avoided the war, the fact is that they didn't, and that was what made the Revolutionary War necessary.

191 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:18pm

Right Wing Conspirator/EE

Excellent link.

192 Occasional Reader  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:23pm

#99 NBK:

There are voices of democracy and reform in Iran. They will be heard at some point.

Will that point be coming before, or after, the mullahs join the Nuclear Club? If it looks like the latter, I'm in favor of hastening along the former, perhaps with some precision strikes using the F-32 Clobbersaurus.

193 security mofo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:26pm

fuck you simon tisdall, fuck you al guardian, fuck you brent scrowcroft, fuck you jimmy carter, fuck all of y'all...

is it nov 3 yet?...


aarrrgghhh !!!

194 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:03:53pm

#186 traveler

Hey Everybody! Summer's Eve is Back!!!

Hit the tip jar!

My thoughts exactly.

pssst...Charles...5 percent sound fair ;-)

195 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:04:08pm

Thom #164

I can even picture the prize (drawn by C&F of course):


A big, self-satisfied, clueless, toothy grin.

196 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:04:26pm

#159 NBK062

Yes of course, most Muslims will never accept an infidel invader even if he's a liberator. That's one thing we learned from Iraq.

But I don't think we need to invade to free Iranians, I think we need to topple this regime because the time has run out to prevent them from going nuclear and bringing their terrorist network with them.

The best way to handle this? Well the best isn't good, but it's better than the worst, eh.

People never really grasped the obvious:

Destruction is always easy. If your family has been touched by violence then you know that it only takes one digusting wretch with a gun or knife to destroy any life, no matter how valued... But technology is the lever that makes it possible for any hater kill 10, or with a bomb 100 or with, say a pinch of weaponized anthrax into a ventalation system, a thousand, or with a nuke, a hundred thousand or more...

Destruction is easy to achieve, and protection almost impossible. So we can't afford to give the haters of the world any more time. The technology is too available, and they're obviously reaching for it.

Another thing people don't grasp is just how sick and bigoted middle eastern society often is... But I don't have the strength to detail that for you. I'll just say that many places, people want blood and they want lots of it and they're teaching their children to want it too.

197 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:05:01pm

May whatever God you pray to, save this Country. For if john kerry and john edwards win this election, they will not.

198 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:05:18pm

#98 Zombie

It's the negotiations that lead to the disasters. War -- and the threat of war -- is what keeps the bad guys in line. Evil men and those with ill-intentions use talk to their advantage. Jimmy, John and their ilk still don't realize that, for reasons I can't fathom.

As a guy who photoarchives Bezerkely and San Francisco rallies, I would have figured you would have understood this by now.


It's their Ideology that makes them moronic

Intellectual Morons : How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas

199 Pete (Alois)  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:05:45pm

This is effed up.

Jimmah needs to quit smoking them aflatoxin-laced peanuts, ah reckon.

200 Rantworst  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:05:57pm

James Earl Carter means well. But then, so do many other bumbling incompetents. I won't defend Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon's pandering to liberals with big government programs and allowing inflation. But Carter's "I will not lie to you." should have been followed up with "but I will steal from you."

Inflation is a tax, and we paid the inflation tax very heavily under Carter, and government revenues ballooned because of it. Carter, of all people, is the last to say what is necessary or not. He wasn't even able to realize that what was necessary then was tax cuts and inflation fighting, when he was President.

And now many of the people leading the attack against Bush are Carter holdovers, accusing Bush of being a failure. But they should know more about failure than any Administration

Carter just has vowels in the mouth because he is soft on Saddam, and has been since he was in office.

201 Midwest Pundit  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:06:13pm

JIMMUH! JIMMUH! JIMMUH!

Why so angry, grasshopper???

Could it be that like Al Gore you lost to a legend with balls of steel?

Could it be that your Glass House of Liberalism is crashing down all around you?

Jimmuh need a hug???

202 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:07:09pm

#175 Studsup

I also voted for Carter in 1976 for the same reasons as you did---it was the biggest mistake of my politcal life.
I atoned by voting for Reagan in 1980--- but the damage was done. Can you imagine what additional disasters would have occured had Carter been re-elected? I really think that four more years of Jimmy's incompetence, dithering and malaise may have been fatal to America, Israel and the West.

203 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:07:25pm

#191 RIP Ford

Thanks. I hope you read through all of it. I love the way it closes -

Apologize, George W. Bush, even though the mistakes are ours.
204 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:07:25pm

#188 Elcid

How are you finding Bethlehem, PA? My old stomping grounds...(lots different from PCB, yes?)

205 ddd  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:07:58pm

I am Canadian and the ass hole British would never had granted the very limited freedom in Canada today.
AS for Egypt they are promoting anti-Semitism every day.
They lie about plane crash.
The only thing they did not do was attack Israel directly is because the Egyptian would be beaten badly and ant land acquired should be Israeli.
Jimmy you should have given Iran 24 hours to hand over the hostage and their capture if not Iran would be a sandpit.

206 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:09:10pm

#195 a.k.a. Will

Yes!

207 CCR  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:11:14pm

I'm trying to come up with a less competent head of state in all history than Jimmy Carter. I think he edges out Nero. Any other suggestions?

I'm certain his amnesty for Vietnam draft dodgers alone has done more harm to this country than any act of treason in our history, including Oppenheimer giving nuclear secrets to Stalin.

I nominate Jimmy Carter for the not so prestigious "Road to Hell Lifetime Acheivment Award"

208 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:11:32pm

#203 Right Wing Conspirator

Yup. Excellent rant! I hope everyone takes it in.

209 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:22pm

QUICK! CNN--Lou Dobbs on now! HEADS UP!!

Douglas Brinkley who wrote the biography on Kerry and has had a change of heart since and now thinks Kerry lied to him is coming on as Lou's guest shortly!

210 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:47pm

#176 grayp

I'm pretty good. Thanks for asking. How is terrorizing the Saudis with a harmless beagle going? That's one of the funniest things I've ever heard.

I agree with the we'll never know when Carter is crazy position. I can only imagine how he cooked the Revolutionary War numbers to arrive at his nutty conclusion. Did he count women who died during childbirth?

211 Thom  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:57pm

#207 CCR

Oppenheimer did not give nuclear secrets to the Soviets. Are you thinking of Klaus Fuchs?

212 Sparkle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:12:58pm

So Billy got all the brains...

who'da thunk it??

213 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:13:48pm

Ugh. I just read the entire interview. Matthews is actually worse than Carter.

"MATTHEWS: What do you make of this new philosophy, Mr. President, that we can go into countries like Iraq and that we can use our force of arms and our economic might to transform them into democracies? It‘s the new conservative philosophy. It‘s the Bush doctrine, whatever you want to call it. What do you make of it?"

It's new? Conservative?

Hey Chris, you dolt, you stupid freaking dolt, why don't ask the Japanese and Germans if they think the idea of using our force of arms and economic strength might transform them into democracies?

Chris, did you spend your entire childhood and adult life watch sitcoms or something? What did you do with the money you mother gave you to pay tuition?

214 Crapulentis_Sum  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:14:11pm

#207 CCR 10/19/2004 03:11PM PST


I'm trying to come up with a less competent head of state in all history than Jimmy Carter. I think he edges out Nero. Any other suggestions?

Pol Pot (and his cronies) of the Kymer Rouge comes to mind and he ruled about the same time as Carter. Coincedence or not ?...

215 eXcel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:14:20pm

"Bloodiest war until recently"

I assume he forgot about the civil war, and WWI and WWII. The next biggest would then be vietnam? and in second to last place we have the 2nd Gulf War. As Phil Hendrie would say "you need a check-up from the neck up."

216 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:15:42pm

#129 RWC

I'm with you! If I didn't laugh sometimes, I'd cry.
It sounded as if Carter's bizarre statement was the last straw for you. "This is fu*king it..." struck me funny.
Much of the really great posts on LGF have wonderful humor included. And that says a lot about us.

I know that is not true on the KOS, DU, and other LLL blogs. Hate precludes humor. It even trumps intelligence. In a way we should feel sorry for them.

A

217 shrewd-attitude  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:17:03pm

I feel terrible! My first voting experience was to vote for Jimmy in the primaries. Of course, at that time, everyone thought he would legalize marajuana. Instead we got 15+% unemployment, where I lived. Thanks Jimmy!

Hey, didn't Jimmy Carter get rich from the Government subsidizing peanut farmers?

218 Andy in Agoura Hills  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:17:16pm

#213 Studsup

Its "Chrissy" Matthews. He's been neutered. Besides you do know he is a Democratic shill, since he worked in the Clinton White House? Right?

220 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:19:46pm

#219

Could be. HOPE NOT.

At least Spain caught some guys. Those cells in the USA that they were 'communicating with' are still out there. Scary.

221 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:19:53pm

#217 shrewd-attitude

Hey, didn't Jimmy Carter get rich from the Government subsidizing peanut farmers?

Yup.

Peanuts -- Supply Quotas Cost Consumers

Every year the USDA establishes a quota on the number of pounds of peanuts that can be grown for domestic consumption. It distributes these quotas to peanut farmers who have a license to grow peanuts. It is illegal to produce and domestically sell peanuts in the United States without a USDA license.
222 eXcel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:20:32pm

"we could have gotten independence bloodlessly like canada and india."

Ever hear of a little thing called 'another hundred years of colonial oppression' ? Not to mention it's naive to think that modern / free U.S. had no influence on Britian's policy on colonies.

223 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:22:37pm

#219 stefania

In the end no people on earth will hate Islamists more than Iraqis.

We win.

224 Portia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:23:41pm

I've not read EVERY post above and I'm sure someone has said this before, but if so it bears repeating:

How can a former president of the US fail to understand what a revolutionary concept the US was when formed? How can he fail to understand that this whole "government of the people" was a re-invention of the founding fathers/a result of the revolutionary war?

No, Jimmah, no. IF the revolutionary war hadn't happened we wouldn't be "free like Canada and India." It would be all princes and potentates as far as the eye can see and no man would be a citizen but all would be subjects.

I like this world betterthan Jimmah's little wonderland.

225 Mossback  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:23:56pm

I was in Sweden when the hostages were taken in Iran. To a person, the Swedes expected war within days. They asked if I'd be going home when the draft started.

Then, day after day: nothing. How Carter survived the humiliation of inaction explains a great about the man whom Kerry emulates.

The man couldn't even mount a rescue effort, FGS!

226 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:24:14pm

#282 Paul -- "I atoned by voting for Reagan in 1980--- but the damage was done. Can you imagine what additional disasters would have occured had Carter been re-elected?"

I took the same prescription. I could never have imagined Carter to have been so ineffective. The seeds of the present day Carter were there to be seen. He blamed the US people for their problems, he never accepted any personal responsibility for anything he did or failed to do. All those traits are coming out now in very ugly ways in this man.

I saw a documentary available on DVD about the "Miracle on Ice". The recent movie was pretty good, but this documentary was even better. The stage was set by casting the 1980 Olympics against the backdrop of the national and international scene. Voiceovers of Carter's "lectures" (can't bring myself to call them speeches) to America are part of that backdrop. Just hearing them now makes you grind your teeth. He was awful, a defeatist and a man you really hated what was great about America. He hated it, because he has none of that greatness in his character.

227 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:24:19pm

204 grayp

Email me, I'll tell ya' all about it.

228 Luigi  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:24:38pm

I'm starting to believe we've really taken out the terrorists' A team in Iraq in that fact that they've kidnapped that Arabic lady aid worker. What a bunch of dumb bunnies! They're only going to have to let her go. Soneone's going to get a call from Kofi or Chirac, and she'll walk. I give it until tomorrow morning.

229 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:24:44pm

#218 Andy

he worked in the Clinton White House?


I don't think so. He was, however, Tip O'Neill's press secretary.

230 pickettj1970  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:26:07pm

I am horrified this maggot was ever the leader of the free world.

231 Beagle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:26:28pm

#213 Studsup

Pat Buchanan and Chris Matthews mean the same thing when they talk about new conservatism. It's a euphemism. I'll just leave it at that.

Fact is though, I've been for a more aggressive foreign policy since I began watching what defeatism got us in Vietnam. I was just a little kid, but it was obvious even then that the opponents of the war had more to do with our failure than the North Vietnamese. Carter (for whom Chris Matthews wrote speeches, by the way) was defeatism walking on two legs.

232 Road Rage  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:26:29pm

Recommended reading,

The Real Jimmy Carter: How Our Worst Ex-President Undermines American Foreign Policy, Coddles Dictators and Created the Party of Clinton and Kerry
by Steven F. Hayward

233 ragman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:27:05pm

#41

There were far more casualties in the Civil War than any other war in American history, not just as a percentage of the population but in raw numbers. I actually took Carter's comment about "until recently" to be a reference to the current situation in Iraq. Can you believe that? I remember his presidency all too well - a total sense of failure and despair on a nationwide basis. This man was the worse president of the modern era, by far. He has now evolved into a bitter, senile, pontificating moron. Just the type of guy the anti-Americans and MSM love.

234 NBK062  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:27:23pm

Wasn't it Carter who said Americans should get used to wearing a sweater, and turning down thermostats?

235 Kyda Sylvester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:28:12pm

Just when you think you've heard it all, Jimmy Carter opens his mouth (again). With no lack of competition, Carter is hands down the worst president of my lifetime (I'm on my 11th) - perhaps of the 20th century. His ineptitude in domestic affairs was surpassed only by his ineptitude in foreign affairs. Hard to believe, but he may be an even greater menace in his current role as the worst ex-president of my lifetime. Apparently peanuts aren't brain food.

236 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:28:37pm

Was the Civil War "unnecessary" too? After all, slavery's no big deal, right?

237 Jheka  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:28:47pm

Carter: America's first "Internationalist," anti-American president. John Kerry hopes to be the second.

238 Ringo the Gringo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:29:16pm

Andy in Agoura Hills

Chris Mathews also worked in the Carter Whitehouse.

239 pbird  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:30:20pm

#10 Eric, yes, he does sound like he's mid-stream in developing senile dementia and some cynical types are using his vapid pronouncements.

240 theparson  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:30:37pm

I know THIS is OT and I do apologize but, it's so rich.
Letters from Americans responding the the Brits trying to influence us dumb Americans.

PS If someone else has posted this I apologize. I admit I haven't read all 200 posts.

241 Jheka  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:30:39pm

Even when the Soviet Union was collapsing from the inside, Carter gave them hope. In the late 70's, the Kremlin seriously thought that they might prevail in the cold war. And so did the White House.

242 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:31:25pm

OT
Israeli love goddess Natalie Portman soon to be Mrs. Weather Underground.

PORTMAN DATING SON OF KILLERS
Hollywood beauty Natalie Portman is reportedly romancing the son of two infamous American murderers.

The 23-year-old star has been spotted out on dates with university graduate Chesa Boudin, the son of radical Weather Underground members Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, who were jailed for murder after the notorious Brinks robbery in Nyack, New York, in 1981.

Two police officers and one Brinks employee were killed in the hold-up.

Kathy was released from prison last year on parole, while David remains incarcerated.

But Portman is so attracted to Boudin, she's refusing to let his family history prevent her from sparking up a relationship with him, according to Britain's The Sun newspaper.

What's the matter with this girl? She's the most beautiful Jewish woman in the world and she's dating a member of one of the ultimate anti-morality violent moonbat families?
[...shakes head sadly...]

243 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:33:13pm

#140 Galactic

Your numbers seem low.

I respectfully submit to you and inivite all LGFer to visit the following site:

American War Details

I'm retired...so I have the time to find this stuff..and I love doing it.

Al

244 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:35:23pm

#242 zombie

Beauty times brains = a constant.

245 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:35:29pm
246 FlyingTigress  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:37:13pm

The only conclusion that I can reach is that Jimmy spent just a little too much time around (a) the power plant of 'nuke' boats and (b) Adm. Rickover (another barking loon -- just prior to his long-overdue retirement during the Reagan administration).

That, or the Saturday Night Live skit about his presidential tour of Three Mile Island after the "oops" was actually true.

This is your brain. (picture of healthy brain)

This is your brain exposed to extended non-lethal doses of radiation from submarine power plants (picture of Jimmy)

Any questions?

247 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:41:11pm

#242 Zombie

248 Barbara Skolaut  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:43:33pm

Jeebux Cripes on a Crutch!

Jimmuh's always been an incompetent traitorous leftist nutbag, but this is beyond the pale!

Has anyone had him examined for clinical senility?

Oh, wait... For his brain to go senile, he'd first have to have a brain.

Wotta maroon.

Ship his worthless carcass to Phrawnce.

249 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:43:49pm

#236 Mr Pol

Was the Civil War "unnecessary" too? After all, slavery's no big deal, right?


C'mon Mr Pol...get with the lingo...slavery was a "nuisance."


Al di Grandpa

I have reached my end with them far before Carter's comment ;-)

250 Aviator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:45:59pm

I have to admit I'm undecided about Carter. I'm not sure if he was just the worst President of the 20th century or if he was the worst President in the history of the republic. (I'm leaning towards the latter.) Senior statesman - bah. More like senile statesman.

251 Bostonian  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:46:38pm

Josh:

Yes of course, most Muslims will never accept an infidel invader even if he's a liberator. That's one thing we learned from Iraq.

Where do you get this nonsense from?

252 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:47:40pm
253 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:48:47pm

#140 Galactic Jello


Apologies to you GJ. Upon further review your numbers appear to very accurate, but the site I referenced above contains other detail for those interested.

Al

254 eeevil conservative  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:49:29pm

Has Carter had any counseling lately?

Could he be suffering from Dimmensia?

okay boys and girls, can we say PEACENICK?

255 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:50:30pm

#242 Zombie,

How many actors and actresses are so deeply obsessed with a need for attention of any kind that they will do almost anything to get it?

This guy Boudin is a snake, a real snake. If you live in the NYC area, where the families of the victims of his murdering mother live, then you had to endure his smarmy and self-indulgent efforts to insert himself in the public eye. It was all part of the effort to rehabilitate the reputation, in futherance of the release from prison, of his mother. She committed the crimes, not him. But he was a decided fixture in helping to retain her release, and the MSM just loved every bit of what this sick pathetic privileged young man had to say and do.

Boudin herself was a child of privilege. He benefitted from that. Even, I think, went to Yale or some such place. Seems he was underprivileged in not having had a "mother", just like the children of the slain policemen didn't have fathers. Yes, that was the moral equivalency found to be so compelling by our MSM and, apparently, the NY State Parol Board, who remain unaccountable for their injustice in this case.

The absolute lowpoint was when he publicly offered to meet with the widow of one of the slain men in order to stage some orgy of public reconciliation and atonement.

It was pathetic. He was a crass self-seeker. The widow, after retaining silence in the face of all the lies and distortions of the MSM of the poor and misunderstood Ms. Boudin, the felony murderer, finally went public with a statement in response to Mr. Boundin's slimy invitation. The statement was short, firm and to the point. Class in the face of liberal crass.

I hope the misguided Ms. Portman gets everything she wants from this relationship and then some.

256 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:51:38pm

#252 song_and_dance_man

Carter is probably the reason so many Americans are allergic to peanuts.

257 Furious J  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:52:24pm

Is Carter trying to equate Washington with Yassir Arafat? That's my read. The colonials were the aggrieved party (a la the PPP) and brits should have welcomed them into a political solution.

OT: Weirdness afoot at Wikipedia

258 harley  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:53:28pm

Oh my God, He is senile. It really is kinda sad. Another thing that duct tape could fix, right across his mouth.

259 mirrror  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:53:31pm

Jimmy Carter:
"Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints and requests the war could have been avoided completely..."


He's probably right. SO WHAT!

Does he think he can change history?

260 CCR  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:54:16pm

#211: probably.

#214: Could be. I still think Jimmah should get the RTHLTAA though.

261 overwatch  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:55:14pm

To be fair, was war inevitable? Take out the propaganda from the UDI and there are actually very few areas which could not have been negotiated on. The main sticker seems to be treatment of the native americans and I'm sure if old George was enough of a tyrant he'd have OK'd a few massacres if that was what it took to keep the show on the road.

262 Big Bamboo  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:56:18pm

Moron !

263 mr_lil_rhody  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:56:39pm

246 FlyingTigress

maybe it was that ufo >:)

264 Bob with one O  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:56:48pm

zombie,

I must repectfully disagree. The world's most beautiful Jewish women are here (intelligence is sexy, you know?).

265 gumble  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:57:22pm

Nobelist Prescott lauds Bush policies

Americans will spend the next two weeks trying to sort through the differences between President George W. Bush and Democratic challenger Sen. John Kerry on many issues.

But on the economic front, especially when it comes to taxes and economic growth, the president's policies are more likely to bear fruit, according to Arizona's new Nobel Prize laureate.

"That's an easy one," said Edward Prescott, the Arizona State University professor who shared the 2004 Nobel Prize for economics.

"When you cut tax rates, employment always goes up," he said in a phone interview Monday with The Arizona Republic.

Prescott, speaking from Minnesota, where he advises the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, described Kerry's plan to roll back tax cuts for top wage-earners as counterproductive.

"The idea that you can increase taxes and stimulate the economy is pretty damn stupid," he said.

Bush's campaign on Monday released a letter signed by Prescott and five other Nobel laureates critical of Kerry's proposal to roll back tax reductions for families earning $200,000 or more.

In The Republic interview, he said such a policy would discourage people from working.

"It's easy to get over $200,000 in income with two wage earners in a household," Prescott said. "We want those highly educated, talented people to work."

266 EddieP  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:58:34pm

Jimmah is on to something. Gee we could still be part of the Austro Hungarian Empire if we hadn't fought in WW1.
We could have more German Kings and Queens than we could count. If old Archduke Ferdinand had a good gun control law, maybe we wouldn't have to be in Sarajevo today.

We already have enough Queens.

/sar

267 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 1:59:51pm

#261 overwatch

To be fair, was war inevitable?

Yes. Somebody had to pay for the war against France, and the British people in Great Britain could not afford it.

268 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:00:06pm

#242 Zombie

Photo additions to Zombie's Hall of Shame

The same family that produced 'Ol Jimmy, also produced

'Ol Billy - Posing here with " 'Ol Redneck Power 1"

Be sure to read the caption above the signature on the can.

Don't miss the

Picture of Billy's grand opening and the Sad Sad story of the demise of this upstanding diplomat to Libya and entrepreneur.

269 Birkel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:00:13pm

Carter said:
the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought

I've not read the whole thread but let me make this point (again if it's made above). That's just plain wrong. The bloodiest American war by far was the Civil War. It's not even close.

So either Jimmy Carter is arguing that President Lincoln's "War of Northern Agression against the South" is similar to President Bush's "Wrong War at the Wrong Time in the Wrong Place" or else he's justing making it up as he goes along.

REPEAT: He's talking about the Civil War or else he's stupid. Or Both.

270 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:02:34pm

Why is Right Wing Conspirator apologizing on behalf of Evolution's Eve?

271 scorched earth 138  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:03:35pm

Geezus, this proves that Billy is the more rational sibling!

272 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:04:55pm

#270 Frank IBC

Why is Right Wing Conspirator apologizing on behalf of Evolution's Eve?

Because he taught her everything she doesn't know.

273 Farmer Joe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:05:07pm

#126, Son of a Pig and a Monkey

If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle!

If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass a-hoppin'.

274 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:05:09pm

Earth to Frank IBC, Earth to Frank IBC

Leave it alone. You'll figure it out after awhile.

This is Houston/out

275 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:05:16pm

#264 Bob with one O 

zombie,
I must repectfully disagree. The world's most beautiful Jewish women are here (intelligence is sexy, you know?).

Of course -- I meant the most beautiful Jewish woman aside from zulubaby.

Interesting factoids from a celebrity biography site:

Profile: Natalie Portman
Birth Name: Natalie Hershlag
Born: June 9, 1981, Jerusalem, Israel
Height: 5' 3"
Fact: Natalie speaks fluent Hebrew
Quote: "I'm going to college. I don't care if it ruined my career. I'd rather be smart than a movie star."
276 RIP Ford  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:05:29pm

#270 Frank IBC

{ahem}
{cough}
{cough}
Froll
{cough}

:P

277 Sevoguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:06:30pm

Jimmy Carter was the last time I voted Democratic in any race. Things to remember about Carter:

The Hostage Crisis
Giving Back the Panama Canal
21% interest rates
The betrayel of the Shah of Iran leading to the formation of the "ISLAMIC STATE." This is the worst thing that could have happened to Iran. Now these religious fanatics are spreading terrorism without impunity. Thanks Jimmy.

The Recession during his Presidency.
Credit Card companies being allowed to raise their rates above 12%.

This list is almost endless.

278 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:07:26pm

;)

279 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:12:26pm

#123 Atlas Wannabe

One word: Dementia

And since he thinks the Revolutionary War was the "bloodiest in American History, here's another one:

Antietam

280 foreign devil  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:12:27pm

#275 zombie:

B-B-But I'm not Jewish. Can I be bootiful too?

281 Al di Grandpa  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:12:42pm

#277 Sevoguy

Ditto on the vote.

We should add the 'Conversion of many Democrats" to his list of accomplisments.

Al

282 kmclay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:14:32pm

Jimmy Carter's mother, aka Miss Lillian, has been quoted as saying that sometimes she looked at her children and wished she remained a virgin...

I guess this would be one of those times.

283 Gary of Carlsbad  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:16:00pm

If I have any complaints about "Team America: World Police", its that the media doesn't get blown up like the idiotarians from Hollywood, and neither does Jimmy Carter.

With the passage of time, its just hard to think of Carter as anything less than a socialist and a traitor to everything this country stands for.

But in this particular case, he reminds me of what Oscar Wilde once said: "An Economist is someone who knows the price of everything...and the value of nothing."

Only an intellectual could believe that the Revolutionary War wasn't worth fighting.

284 Right Wing Conspirator  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:16:49pm

#270 Frank IBC

Why is Right Wing Conspirator apologizing on behalf of Evolution's Eve?


Men do a lot of stupid things when it comes to women.
:-P

285 American Infidel[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:17:41pm
286 jrdroll  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:18:15pm

#277 sevoguy

Billy Beer

287 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:19:34pm

Carolina Girl:

Yes, the Civil War was 600,000 dead, and Antietam was 23,500 ALL BY ITSELF.

Antietam alone was five times the number of dead compared to the Revolutionary War.

288 jrdroll  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:20:42pm

#285 American Infidel

Do you all think I should accost her tomorrow or not???

Good time to practice voter intimidation.
/sarc off

289 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:21:25pm

RWC -

Heheheh. :)

Related to that, were you the one that was commiserating with me a while back, about the "hard-to-get-ishness" of South American women (or girlie men)?

290 Cornholio  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:21:42pm

Even the French don't surrender wars from 200 years ago. I hope news of Carter's speech doesn't reach England. Otherwise, we'll get the following message from Prince Charles: "Americans, I have canceled your presidential election. Oh, and this April, kindly send your American income tax forms to Her Majesty's Royal Treasury in London."

291 mich-again  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:22:05pm

What Jimmy is saying is that George Washington was nothing more than a terrorist to the British and if only the British Empire had been more sensitive to his concerns, then everyone would have gotten along and no one would have been killed.

What a marooon!

292 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:22:16pm

Precise figures are hard to come by, but most historians agree that Revolutionary War fatalities did not exceed 30,000, including civilians and all combatants, and were probably little more than half that.

Many of the relevant figures for other wars have already been quoted here.
The Civil War exceeded all others combined, killing some 2% of the entire population in military fatalities alone.
I have never seen reliable totals for civilian casualties in the Civil War (and there were no large scale massacres) but they must have run into the tens of thousands just from forced evacuation, starvation, and simply being in the way.

Carter is truly demented. With him as a source, NEA drones and lefty professo-liars will no doubt soon be telling students that the current war is the bloodiest in history---and getting away with it.

293 Bryan Hiott  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:22:33pm

Jimmy Carter truly revealed his ignorance of American history when he called the Revolutionary War "the most bloody" we've fought until recently. Matthews revealed that he was completely in the tank for Carter when he referred to the former POTUS as a historian.

Let me set the record straight. First, Carter may be a historian; but he is an amateur at best. Second, the Civil War remains the most bloody American military conflict. In September 1862, in one day of battle on the fields of Sharpsburg, Maryland, more Americans fell than in any other single day of battle in our history.

294 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:22:37pm

#119 Beckoning Chasm

Same here. Old enough to vote for Carter. Smart enough not to.

295 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:23:24pm

Actually, for this thread, shouldn't it be

"Revolution's Eve"?

296 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:24:37pm

#285

Oh yes, by all means. Tell her it's something he has in common with John Kerry, by Kerry's own admission...

297 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:24:47pm

Just remember if not for Billy Carter -- Ronald Reagan would have had more difficulty beating 'Ol Jimmy, . . . but not much.

Once sober, Billy was no longer in demand on the talk-show circuit, so he turned again to his Libyan friends for financial help. In July 1980 he belatedly registered as a foreign agent of the Libyan government and admitted to receiving a $220,000 "loan" for oil sales he was supposed to facilitate. The press rushed to find out whether the president's brother had hawked his influence with the White House, and a new presidential scandal, "Billygate," was born. As Jimmy himself later admitted, "He was the president's brother, and therefore fair game."
While relatively few people doubted Carter's basic integrity, the whole thing did cast further doubts on his judgment, and what Kaufman calls his "presidential timber" in the midst of the president's uphill battle for re-election. "The damn Billy Carter stuff is killing us," complained Hamilton Jordan. It was the last thing the Carter campaign needed going into the Democratic convention in August.

Thank you Jimmy but a Big Big Thank you to Billy Carter & Margo Hemmingway (What some girls won't do for a $)

Compared to Zulubaby & Zombie,

'ol Billy&Margo look like last week's left over hog jowls & hash browns.

298 Zeke  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:25:25pm

Next thing this peanut farmer will be saying is how those M16's really won the Revolutionary War for us even though it wasn't really necessary...and of course Kerry will chime in with "You're right Jimbo, but those automatic weapons have no place in a civilians hands today like they did back then...

It really is getting this insane...

300 American Infidel[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:27:17pm
301 BenJeremy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:27:39pm

Well, joining the party late, I'm skipping all of the above commenct (sorry), but first off...

Wow.

Carter was the worst President ever, before this comment, but AFTER this comment, :::sigh::: I can't even give him the benefit of just being a bumbling, misguided peacenik with no common sense.

To make that statement, you have to be a complete and utter moron - or an absolutely evil communist sympathiser.


Without the American Revolution, there is no Democracy to influence all of the uprisings, both violent and peaceful, that resulted in dozens of other democracies throughout the 1800s... The United States was THE MODEL for democracy in action, a success story beyond the wildest dreams of freedom-loving citizens around the world. Without that bloody revolution, the royals of Great Britain would still hold America, India and it many other colonies firmly under their thumbs. Even the British government itself would look vastly different!!

Not only does Carter deserve the title of "Worst President Ever" - but he should have his former Presidency REVOKED, all bills he enacted REPEALED, his image pulled from all official buildings, and his name stricken from history books (the last part might be too rash, as we might want to let him serve as an example).

What a disgusting excuse of a human being.

302 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:29:03pm

#107 daknightman

I don't know -- the same delusional group that thinks that Kerry is fit to be President. They wanted Ford out because Ford was "selected, not elected..."

Oooo...anyone get a shiver of moonbat deja vu or just me?

303 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:29:48pm

#298
Don't forget, Zeke, it was the US Army Air Corps' carpet-bombing of Coventry in 1780 that turned people like Fisk against us.

304 HUSKER  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:32:09pm

Hopefully Bush will lose and then Kerry can administer some of the OBVIOUSLY AWESOME STEM CELL therapy that Bush has BANNED to Jimmy Carter, he definitely needs something! I thought the Civil War was bloodier than the Revolutionary War. That must be, "Wrong stat, Wrong post!" sorry.

305 LoFlyer  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:32:54pm

History will not be kind to Mr. Carter’s term as President. I admire his work with Habitat for Humanity, but he has failed both as a president and as elder statesman. With a record like that why would anyone listen to him? Again this is the liberal bias of the MSM at work. The MSM ignores his failure as a president and trumpets his achievements as a statesman, ignoring items such as the disastrous North Korean treaty brokered by Carter and implemented by Clinton. The MSM publishes creative revisionist history before it’s even in the history books. This is getting to look more and more like the old Soviet Union and Pravda, the MSM of the Soviets creating the cultural atmosphere which suppressed western democratic ideology and enhanced and sympathetic coverage of communism. The fact that this being done voluntarily and without any centralized leadership speaks volumes for the decades of indoctrination by the left in our universities and schools.

306 Bukko  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:33:33pm

Jimmy Carter is one stupid fuck. Some people think you can be nice and the bad people will go away. They are stupid fucks! It takes people like Bush to keep the Jimmy Carters of the world safe.

307 Studsup  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:33:54pm

#285 American Infidel -- "Do you all think I should accost her tomorrow or not???"

Absolutely not! She'll probably have you up on charges and sue you for any number of claims. This is a bonafide moonbat you are talking about here, and a nosey self-important one to boot. Would you accost a rattlesnake or a rabid raccoon?

Now, if she were to come out with another "you know he's a war criminal don't you?" , you might respond by saying -- "you mean Bill Clinton, of course he is -- he killed Belgrade citizens to get the Broadrick rape allegations off the front page". Or "John Kerry, of course he is, he admitted it to Congress".

If that's all too long, a simple "f**k off loser" works too.

308 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:34:38pm

Another Factoid about 'ol Jimmy.

He has authored many books, including a collaborative effort with his Daughter Amy Carter


" ... She entered Brown University in 1987 where she was arrested during student protests against US foreign policy in South Africa and Central America (the charges were later dropped, surprise surprise).
She went on to obtain her masters in art history from Tulane University.

She married computer consultant James Wentzel in 1996, retains her maiden name and has a son Hugo James Wentzel.

She illustrated The Little Baby Snoogle-Fleejer, a children's book written by her father. "

Not a book about War.

309 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:34:57pm

#300 American Infidel

I believe so. But when do Moonbats actually let a fact deficiency stop them?

Plus, they have no manners, and we're I come from, Honey Child, manners are EVERYTHING.

310 Rose  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:35:47pm

Australia 0909 hours
This is too much to get my brain round at this hour-need a double strength black coffee -
lump us with the Canadians!!!
that aside- Australia was never a Colonized as were the Americas and Canada- we were a penal colony, a vast 'empty ' land in which to dump all prisoners from the overcrowed gaols and the Hulks ( old ships where prisoners were held as the gaols very full to overflowing. As a consequence it was found that their were vast grasslands to graze stock and then discovery of gold. But 'free' one can say that now but technically and constitutionally we are still bound to Britain, and though as British born and a 'Monarchist' I can see that within a few years we will be a Republic.
My generation are loyal to the Royal Family for historical reasons and respect of their example during WW2.
With the cessation of mass immigration from the 'Old country' we '10 pound poms' are aging and I do not think the next generation have the same emotional ties- I know that my own adult children are far more America orientated and show no interest in Britain and the Royals.
America is the MOST FREE nation on the planet and long may she remain so.
You will have a flood of French, German, Dutch and Spaniard sand possibly British queuing to immigrate to the USA with in 10 years from their formerly free countries who will be part of the Greater Caliphate of ISLAM

311 Carolina Girl  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:37:06pm

#308 Havoc

Didn't Jimmah also state, during that farce he called a Presidency, that he discussed possible nuclear policy with friggin' Amy (who was what? 10 at the time?)

A complete fool. A national embarrassment. Words fail me.

312 Zeke  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:37:07pm

#298

You're right! I had forgotten all about that bombing back in 1780... That was almost as bad as our tanks rolling over the brave Brit troops on Bunker Hill.

My grandkids are gonna love this new "make it up as you go" History when comrade kerry wins. I can hardly wait!

313 Patrizio  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:39:27pm

OFF TOPIC (but very much worth it)

Remember the Guardian's campaign to influence voters in Clark County, Ohio?

You know, to vote for Kerry...

Well, the Washington Post has a piece that mentions it, and provides this little jewel of a link. Through it, you can read the angry replies the Americans gave to the whiney arrogant Communists that call themselves "Liberals" and "Britons"

314 Rose  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:39:58pm

Addit
Jimmy need to read up on India

315 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:41:36pm

If Bush had not invaded Iraq
10/19/2004


Democrat Presidential nominee John Kerry delivered a speech today condemning President Bush for failing to invade Iraq in the follow-up of military action against the Talaban and Al Qaeda in Afghanastan. "Leaving this tyrant in power in contravention of numerous United Nations resolutions is unconscionable," Kerry told the Veterans of Foreign Wars. "He has left available a base of operations and a source of supply and money."

Kerry went on to criticize the war against terror as "stalled" while the real threat to America, "Saddam Hussein’s Iraq goes untouched." Kerry said, "People are murdered daily in Baghdad and throughout the country. Rape rooms are a tragic reality. Torture chambers are full as Saddam’s sons carry out their sadistic impulses on the helpless and hapless victims of this regime. President Bush has done nothing as this brutal dictator takes the money from the Oil for Food to build palaces while his people go without food...

"There can be no doubt of Saddam’s ties to our terrorist enemies. We know that in 1998, after bin Laden issued his public fatwa against the United States, two al Queda members went to Iraq where they met with Iraqi intelligence. Within weeks, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet with bin Laden and extend to him safe haven in Iraq. Bin Laden remained with the Talaban, but the invitation from Saddam was always there. Al-Zarqawi has long received refuge in Iraq. The terrorist Forouk Hijazi is known to train his forces there. Abu Nidal has safe haven in Baghdad as he plots murders. Abu Abbas, who planned the hijacking of the Achille Lauro, lives in safety in Iraq. And at Salman Pack, just south of Baghdad, terrorists train using the fuselage of a commercial jet airline. The trail of evidence revealing Saddam Hussein’s ties to terrorists is self-evident to all but those in the White House.

"Our own intelligence organizations and those of Great Britain, France and Germany, agree that Saddam is aggressively pursuing weapons of mass destruction. For all that, he has been left free to further develop his weapons of mass destruction which he can deliver into the hands of those who make war against us at any moment. Saddam Hussein has trained, financed and armed terrorist who attack and murder us, yet our President stands stalled on the border of Iraq, preoccupied with wiping up the last remnants of the Talaban in Afghanistan. To leave this cancer in the midst of the Middle East is to have assured defeat in this so-called war against terror. We need fresh leadership, a President with the vision to remove those who support our enemies from power. To have not invaded Iraq, when the whole world acknowledged the necessity, is to leave a job undone and is the height of arrogance and criminal stupidity."

UPDATE: Thanks to Instapundit for the link.

[Link: www.sunnyblog.com...]

316 zombie  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:43:05pm

#280 foreign devil

B-B-But I'm not Jewish. Can I be bootiful too?

No.

317 ewok10  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:43:25pm

Canada and Australia gained their freedom from Britain because the British found out what it was like to lose a war.
Jimmy would have been on the wrong side in that war too!

318 a.k.a. Will  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:43:42pm

Next, Jimmy will explain how increased sensitivity and diplomacy could have saved all those people from the Huns and Mongols.

319 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:44:18pm
320 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:45:38pm
321 Dar ul Harbarian  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:45:39pm
CARTER: Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought.

cough..cough...Chickamauga...hack...cough...Gettys burg...snort...cough...Chancellorsville...

322 Howling Cat  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:46:15pm

I was old enough to vote for Jimmah in 1976, but I didn't. I was working for the Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept. We had a lot of people who favored Carter because he championed "zero-based budgets." Do ahead, ask me how well zero-based budgets worked in the Parks & Wildlife Dept.

323 G.Galvan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:46:56pm

This just goes to prove what the LLL has been saying all along. Republicans (especially GWB) are stupid, and Democrats like Carter are smart.


/sarcasm off

324 Tiby2  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:47:11pm

I'm probably late, but these numbers are from the Department of Defense:

[Link: web1.whs.osd.mil...]

WAR/CONFLICT DEATHS
---
REVOLUTIONARY WAR TOTAL 4,435
1775-1783

WAR OF 1812 TOTAL 2,260
1812-1815

MEXICAN WAR TOTAL 1,733
1846-1848

CIVIL WAR (UNION FORCES ONLY) TOTAL 140,414
1861-1865 E/

SPANISH - AMERICAN WAR TOTAL 385


WORLD WAR I TOTAL 53,402
1917-1918

WORLD WAR II TOTAL 291,557
1941-1946 H/

KOREAN CONFLICT TOTAL 33,651
1950-1953 K/

VIETNAM CONFLICT TOTAL 47,378
1964-1973 M/

325 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:48:03pm

All reputable accounts of the French Revolution (those written before the 1960s, that is) emphasize the importance of the American example in fomenting the original 1789 uprising against the French monarchy.

If it weren't for the Revolutionary War, we would now be negotiating with Louis XXIII of France for navigation rights on the Mississippi.

326 Oxbow in Fla  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:50:12pm

I've heard this story from two nuclear engineers I work with. During Carter's time in the Navy, Admiral Rickover made a personal decisions on every officer and civilian engineer involved in the nuc sub program. Rickover rejected Carter and refused to allow him to serve in the sub fleet.

His "unbalance" was well known dring his short term in the Navy.

327 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:50:38pm
328 azul93gt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:51:19pm

As if through a looking glass dumbly.

329 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:52:24pm

#311 Carolina Girl

(Havoc waves a furry paw)

Oh yes, Amy advised him on Nuclear Policy, and "Steel Magnolia" Rosalynn sat in on Cabinet Meetings and Oval Office meetings to protect her wussy husband and control who he allowed to interview him after 1976 . . .

The November 1976 Playboy interview --

" I try not to commit a deliberate sin. I recognize that I'm going to do it anyhow, because I'm human and I'm tempted. And Christ set some almost impossible standards for us. Christ said, 'I tell you that anyone who looks on a woman with lust has in his heart already committed adultery.'
"I've looked on a lot of women with lust. I've committed adultery in my heart many times. This is something that God recognizes I will do--and I have done it--and God forgives me for it."

Next night in the Presidential Quarter's - - -

Jimmy: " Rosalynn . . . I think we're alone now darlin' "

Rosalynn: "Jimmy . . . STFU "

330 manofaiki  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:54:45pm

How the fuck did this guy ever become Gov. of Georgia?


More guys from Georgia alone died in the Civil War than the total colonial casualties in the Revolutionary War.

There's a link with stuff like this up somewhere but I can't find it. It shows American deaths in all wars from the Revolutionary War to the first Gulf War.

We didn't even lose 20,000 colonists if I remember aright.

Over 100,000 Americans died in the Civil War.

How could he not know that?

manofaiki

331 DrZin  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:54:54pm

What a f*cking idiot; the Revolutionary War was one of the LEAST bloody wars we'd ever fought. What the hell is he thinking?!?

Everyone always talks about how "smart" that mendacious, seditious son of a b*tch is . . . I have YET to see any indication of that.

332 Lizard by the Bay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:55:10pm

OT: Attention all Bay Area Lizards (especially East Bay)

I would like your help in boycotting Renaissance Rialto Theaters. Now, this pains me to do this. RRT is a company that has rescued many old art-deco era theaters and kept them open and operating when others wanted to tear them down. And for years I worked for the company (though it has been a long time).

But now, Alan Michan, the company's owner, has gone overboard with his politics. Three of his four theaters are currently being used EXCLUSIVELY for showing pro-Kerry and anti-Bush propaganda. At the Oaks Theater he is showing "Unconstitutional: The War on our Civil Liberties", "Soldier's Pay", and "Unprecedented: The 2000 Presidential Election". At the Orinda Theatre he is showing "Going Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry" and "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism". And the Park Theater in Lafayette is showing the pro-communist "Motorcycle Diaries".

Some of you may not patronize these theaters (or his fourth one, The Grand Lake) anyway. But if you ever have, or even if you don't but live in the East Bay, call the Renaissance Rialto front office at (510) 452-1998 and tell then exactly why you plan to never give them one of your hard-earned dollars again.

333 HUSKER  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:55:40pm

# 285 American Infidel

Yes. Shoot her and pull an untraceable tiny gun out of your boot and stick it in her hand so as to get her prints on it. Then say it was self defense. Seen it in a movie once.

For optimum effect fire the untraceable tiny gun at a wall beforehand so as to substantiate that she fired first.

Also replace your 'W 04' sticker with 'Re-defeat Bush' sticker and say, "Quagmire and Halle Burton" alot, the authorities won't even ask you a single question.

334 tgibbs  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:56:33pm

#160 Crowscape

Vietnam was not a military failure, it was a political one. Our military won every single battle that was asked of it. The Tet Offensive was an utter military disaster for the Vietcong. If the politics were left out of it and our troops were allowed to move into the North, Vietnam would have been a happy democratic state today and a million civilians wouldn't have been slaughtered in Laos and Cambodia

And just what would we have "won" for our investment of 50,000 American lives, aside from the dubious privilege of occupying a large chunk of Southeast Asia and suffering continued casualties for who knows how long? In one sense, it was indeed a political failure--because the American people would never have agreed, then or now, to sacrifice thousands of their children for an experiment in Southeast Asian nation-building. So they were told instead that American security was at stake, that we had to win in Vietnam to prevent a Communist takeover of Southeast Asia that would be catastrophic for America. Yet, when the war ultimately was lost, the Domino Theory turned out to be as much a paranoid delusion as Saddam's stocks of WMD. The dominoes fell, to be sure, but they fell the other way.

335 Jagster  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:57:12pm

# 78 Bob


King George should have been more sensitive. How did this guy get to be Pres?

Because he looked good compared to Hanoi John and Lyndon Johnson?

336 manofaiki  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:59:33pm

Just followed the link and I was right.

The official number from combat deaths for the Revolutionary War is 4,435.

The official number of combat deaths in the Civil War (not counting those who died of other causes, which was 3 times higher) is

184,594.

So Jimmy Carter was off by about 180,000 dead soldiers.

Georgia, along with South Carolina and Virginia, was one of the hardist hit states as far as casualties went.

More Georgia Confederates died in the Civil War than colonists killed in the entire Revolutionary War.

Once again, Jimmy Carter demonstrates what a unique individual he is.

manofaiki

337 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 2:59:41pm

From time to time, historians rate the Presidents and usually either James Buchanan (who did very little to avert the coming Civil War) or Warren Harding (who did very little, period) are listed as the worst. But Buchanan and Harding look like Washington and Lincoln compared with Jimmah. Nobody had to listen to Buchanan and Harding (who died in office) yammer on for 20 plus years after their disgraceful terms were over.

Somebody made the amusing comment earlier in this thread that if Watergate hadn't happened Jimmy would would just be talking this B.S. to Jed at the feed store. But I doubt the guys at the feed store would be buying the idea that the Revolutionary War was unneccesary.

Carter was the South's Revenge for losing the Civil War - well, he would have been except for the unfortunate (for Southerners) fact that he was their g-ddamn President too.

Regarding Natalie Portman: Sadly, she's a big time idiotarian. She visited Milwaukee recently to remind all us fly-over types that we need to vote for Kerry. The citizens of her native land seem to disagree with her strongly on that point. Sadly, I don't know how much the Israelis will be able to influence their American cousins.

338 Lizard by the Bay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:01:05pm
Yet, when the war ultimately was lost, the Domino Theory turned out to be as much a paranoid delusion as Saddam's stocks of WMD.

Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese slaughtered by their northern brothers after we pulled out. Tell that to the millions more killed in Cambodia and Laos as communism spread like a cancer. Tell that to the ones still alive with fresh memories of the re-education camps.

Fighting communism is never a bad idea, unless you don't plan to win.

339 ragman  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:01:25pm

The most historically accepted figure on civil war deaths, on both sides, is over 600,000. It produced more casualties than all other American wars combined.

340 The Hardcore One  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:01:52pm

Johnny Damon on a crutch!

Just when I thought Jimbo couldn't have said anything stupider than his comments on the election a few weeks ago, he goes and tops himself...

Then again, seeing that this man did jack squat about the mad mullahs in Iran, let the Sovs walk right into downtown Kabul, lectured us all about "malaise" and other things...it's par for the course for this idiot.

And if the Revolutionary War was the bloodiest one in our history, he's learned some stuff I sure as heck didn't in school. Last time I checked, the Civil War, WWII and a few others kinda made the Revolution look like child's play in regards to casulties.

Good G-d. The Union lost as many soldiers as the Continental Army did in the ENTIRE REVOLUTION in a matter of minutes at Cold Harbor. Antietam/Sharpsburg was a butcher's bill that trumped EVERYTHING before it (as in more Americans died that day than in the Revolution, War of 1812, & Mexican War combined). And Fat Crissy refers to this dimwit as a "historian"??? Victor Davis Hansen is a historian...the late Stephen Ambrose was a historian...Jimmy Carter is FAR from being a historian.

As for the questions from Matthews, typical Fat Crissy. Why am I not shocked...

In parting...there's a quote from Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars that could sum this up...

"Who's more foolish? The fool (Carter) or the fool that follows him (Matthews, Kerry, Moore, et al)?"

341 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:02:48pm
342 Lizard by the Bay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:03:02pm
Regarding Natalie Portman: Sadly, she's a big time idiotarian.

What do you expect from a religiously new-age vegan?

343 whiner  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:03:50pm

Matthews just aired part two of the interview a few minutes ago. Dhimmi did not disappoint . . .

344 willhemakeit  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:06:45pm

I live outside of Plains Ga, Carter's home town. When he left the Depot in Plains to go take his place as president there were 200 people there to see him off. Four years later there were thousand there to make sure the son-of-a-bitch was home.

345 manofaiki  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:07:32pm

#334 tgibbs -

As far as nation building in Southeast Asia it worked out fine for the Japanese and the South Koreans.

Too bad we didn't get a real chance in Vietnam, or they would probably have a country just like S. Korea today.

Instead, like N. Korea, they are a basket case surviving on charity.

What people overlook is that we tried to do for the South Vietnamese what we had alreadly done successfully in South Korea just 10 years earlier - stopped a Communist invasion and set up a fledging government moving towards democracy.

We did a good job in South Korea, the benefits of which can be seen today, because at the time there was no fifth column at work at home undermining the war effort.

Ten years later in Vietnam, that wasn't the case.

For over 45 years the people of South Korea have enjoyed freedom and prosperity while a small US presence has remained behind watching the DMZ, and in a few years even those troops will be gone.

Would that S. Vietnam had ended the same way, but it didn't.

The Vietnamese would be a hell of a lot better off today if it had.

manofaiki

346 pizall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:08:16pm

This "great man" will be in the town where I work (Framingham, MA) tonight. I think he has some kind of book signing.

Word is, security has really been increased. I am still not sure why though, I mean, the enemies got to love him.

Just a thought

347 Elcid  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:09:17pm

344 willhemakeit

I live outside of Plains Ga, Carter's home town. When he left the Depot in Plains to go take his place as president there were 200 people there to see him off. Four years later there were thousand there to make sure the son-of-a-bitch was home.

ROTFLMAO...

348 Sword of Beowulf  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:10:06pm

I agree with JC regarding the American Revolution. Had they realized what they had then...

Since the British abolished slavery a couple of decades (I think) before the US Civil War, speculation on what could have been is probably infinite.

I think Jimmy the C is a dork, nonetheless, however intellectually honest his comments on the British and the American Revolution may be...

349 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:13:19pm

willhemakeit:

Four years later there were thousand there to make sure the son-of-a-bitch was home.

But he got away!!! Damnit, couldn't y'all have locked him in a barn or brained him with a cattle prod everytime someone with a camera and a microphone got within 50 feet of the man?

House arrest would have been appropriate.

:-D

350 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:14:57pm

# 332 Lizard by the Bay

While I support you in your sentiment.

I'm from Chicago -- and when it comes to organizing boycott's

I've seen Jesse Jackson, and you're no Jesse Jackson.

351 Cam  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:15:08pm

#348 Sword of Beowulf:

Since the British abolished slavery a couple of decades (I think) before the US Civil War

1833, IIRC.

352 PETN Sandwich  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:16:05pm

"Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought."

Give me some of whatever Carter is smoking! ... err, second thought I'll pass. Whatever Carter's been huffing has caused permanant brain damage.

353 kathyn  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:19:06pm

Carter is sure becoming a "nuisance".

354 Lizard by the Bay  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:20:03pm

#350 Havoc

I'm under no illusions that I'll be shutting down this theater chain. But if I can help inform people about where to spend their money on a night at the movies, and maybe persuade enough people to call them and let them know that their naked partisan politics will cost them money in the long run, then I'll have done enough to be happy.

355 Renna  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:21:00pm

#346 pizall

I have one of those books he signed! Stood in line for hours. What do you think I could get for it?

Any offers from this group?

356 dbdukes  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:21:12pm

#330 manofaiki

How the fuck did this guy ever become Gov. of Georgia?


1970 Georgia was a one-party state. Running against Hal Suit, a Republican journalist (and, in my opinion, a good man), Carter was a shoo-in. No other excuse. And, as I learned in the Army, the maximum effective range of an excuse is 0 meters.

On behalf of all sensible Georgians, I apologize to the US and to the world.

357 Megan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:21:39pm
Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints

But I thought that whenever anyone hated America, it was our fault. If only Washington and the rest of the colonists had asked why they hate us, and had more respect...I mean, monarchy and taxation without representation, that was just part of British culture at the time...And the colonists believed they had a right to own guns! How barbaric!!! They never asked permission from anyone to rebel. And they didn't want to pay taxes...typical greedy American capitalists thinking about themselves and no one else! They probably only fought the revolution for Israel anyway./sarcasm (hope you could tell)

358 BenJeremy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:23:16pm

#319 Iron Fist 10/19/2004 04:44PM PST


I'm beginning to wonder if his awful Presidency was not deliberate. I'm old enough to remember stagflation and the 444 Days of Humiliation (we should have nuked Iran then).

Well, even before that, Carter could have convinced the Shah of Iran to defuse the volatile situation with his people, and end-run around the Islamists to keep a progressive, modern government in power... instead, we left them out to dry.


Let's not forget, it was CARTER who cozied up to Osama and Saddam. His "peace" negotions with Israel gave Egypt valubale territory to help smuggle weapons and explosives to Palestinian terrorists. Ten years after giving the Canal to Panama, we had to knock the despot Noriega out of office. Erase his "accomplishments" and the world becomes a better, safer place for all of humanity.

Carter is like a one-man-France... he's left a legacy that America has spent over two decades cleaning up, and is directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans.

359 Juliette  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:23:21pm

I cast my first vote for president for this guy. Don't hurt me! I was nineteen.

360 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:24:33pm

#236 Mr Pol


Was the Civil War "unnecessary" too? After all, slavery's no big deal, right?

I get your point and Im with you on it but just so you will know; contrary to popular belief, that war was caused by much more than slavery.

361 mailmars  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:27:31pm

#72

Doing the same thing over & over again, expecting different resultsHey! come to think of it...all Democrats must be crazy!!

Sorry for posting so late in thread but could not let this one go... Not crazy.. that is the definition of stupid...


Mark

362 mich-again  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:29:36pm

Jimmuh, your brain aint working too good anymore. Too bad that your mouth still does.

363 johnCV  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:30:03pm

My first hat tip!

ululululululululululululu

364 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:31:09pm

#360 Stonewall

I get your point and Im with you on it but just so you will know; contrary to popular belief, that war was caused by much more than slavery.

Yes, there were other reasons behind it. Still, despite the recently rewritten LLL history, slavery was one of the major reasons.

365 stlglf  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:31:25pm

What, the most bloody war??? Total revolutionary war killed and wounded 10,623 (4,435 killed) while bad, not the bloodiest by far. There was that nasty Civil war, 110,100 killed or mortally wounded with 224,580 dead from disease, then there's that little thing known as WWII, 291,557 american KIA's. That doesn't even count WWI, Korea, Viet Nam, even the Mexican American war was more bloody 13,000 or so deaths in service. This guy is a nut, and worse one who doesn't know what he's talking about.

366 chris_m  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:32:24pm

the next time I hear that Jimmy Carter was 'one of our most intelligent Presidents' I will remember this ignorant statement.

367 Paul Denton  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:32:46pm

Imagine my surprise, to get home from a midterm exam on a course covering Britain from 1760-1870 and see this. It's practically a bonus question.

To sum up from the historical British foreign policy perspective, since I don't see it here: Even if there'd been a trend towards granting self-government by the "Responsible Government" movement of the 1850s and 60s without the experience of having imperial control forcefully repudiated, still-British American colonies probably wouldn't have been considered white enough to risk limited independence upon. Think South Africa or Bermuda - the racial factor made those in power reluctant to allow self-government for fear of chaos, right up until the 20th century. How many mini-"racist republics" would Jimmah have had existing in the place of the states of Georgia, Alabama, the Carolinas, Florida, et al?

368 z  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:36:17pm

I'm far down on the comments, so maybe someone else caught this, but from what I read, I didn't see anyone object to his reference to how Canada, India, and Australia are free countries now.

He must think that Canada, India, and Australia-to the degree that these countries have freedom-developed freedom completely independently from the fact of the existence of America.

If we could just go back and erase the start of America, and instead let the British set up shop and rule from overseas, China, India, and Australia, would be just the same as they are today, or better, as the thinking goes.

In this view it seems that America is really an accident, has nothing essential to do with the existence of freedom of Man on Earth.

And Matthews said Carter was studying history?

369 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:41:28pm

#364 Mr Pol

Respectfully speaking, I'm not exactly sure what rewrite you are speaking of so I won't address that. However, being quite the student of the history of that war as well as the heritage of my ancestors, I can not over state that there exists a much deeper cause and that slavery was more of a " straw that broke the camels back " thing than anything else. There are constitutional issues as well as many other self determination issues invovled I would ask you to read some of the opinions of Dr. Walter Williams to see where I'm coming from on this issue. At any rate we are both conservatives so let us not parse words over over an issue that is of no consequence between now and nov. 2nd.

370 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:41:42pm

#354 Lizard by the Bay

RE: Your Orinda and Lafayette Theater bocott

Some suggestions --

-- Put a big sandwiche board sign in the back of your pickup with the Items in # 322 in big letters double sided. Park it in front of the theater. about 5:30 on Friday and Saturday Night.

-- Wear a sandwiche board sign with the Items in # 322 in big letters double sided. Walk in front of the Theater until 10 PM. Wear a raincoat and Rainhat to protect you from the Starbucks coffee and the Gyros (Alekos Mmmm) thrown at you by the Home Grown LLL

-- Hand out discount coupons to the new Century 16 Theaters in Walnut Creek and Pleasant Hill

-- have a hand megaphone and Sing "This Land is your Land" Have your laptop playin the JibJab cartoon by wifi on the hood of the pickup

-- Get Zombie to take pictures and post to the Web

-- Call Rush Limbaugh and Hannity and get interviewed live

-- Repeat for 52 weeks

371 mich-again  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:44:05pm

332 Lizard..

I agree with you, but I go a bit further. I haven't been to ANY movie in ages. I hate the hollywood bitches so much that I can't see giving them one single dollar.

Just what is the allure of sitting in a dark dirty room with a bunch of fatass strangers watching some BS movie and you don't even have the remote? F hollywood, F the bleating heart actors, F the whole damn motion picture industry.

Hell yeah I'm down with your boycott!

372 dairydog  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:44:47pm

And now they're trying to influence our elections. Because "the whole world needs a voice".

The Guardian: "Operation Clark County"

373 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:44:48pm

#369 Stonewall

Respectfully speaking, I'm not exactly sure what rewrite you are speaking of so I won't address that.

Lots of LLLs in Europe are now saying the Civil War was sparked only by economical concerns, slavery was just used as an excuse, the North was a lot more racist than the South and anyway, slavery in the South wasn't that bad...

Do I need to tell you how much I loathe those 'historians'?

374 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:44:56pm

Lizard by the Bay

Bocott is how they say Boycott in Plains, GA

375 Megan  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:49:20pm

If people today were around in 1776...
Michael Moore- The Loyalists who have risen up against the Patriots are not "insurgents" or "terrorists" or "The Enemy." They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow -- and they will win.
There is no evidence that the British are a threat. That is a lie.
Kerry-I voted for the Declaration of Independence before I voted against it.
Kofi Annan- The American Revolution did not have international approval, it was illegal.
Chirac- Would say "France is America's ally" despite having trade deals with the British, and selling weapons to the British.
ANSWER- No war for (tax-free) tea!
Sheila Jackson Lee, Jim Moran, Pat Buchanon- We're fighting for the Jews!

376 joe_surfs35  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:50:44pm

Casualty stats at [Link: www.cwc.lsu.edu...]

377 JohnSteele  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:52:07pm

#196 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar
#159 NBK062

Yes of course, most Muslims will never accept an infidel invader even if he's a liberator. That's one thing we learned from Iraq.

It has little it anything to do with Iraq. D**n few people will happily accept an invader, Muslim or non, infidel or not. Some 'occupations' are more acceptable than others. Germany and Japan 'accepted' the occupation because the fabric of their nation and society had essentially been obliterated. They were 'defeated' and it was obvious to everyone involved.

Remember, for the most part there were no two bricks standing one on the other in Japan and Germany. We did not do that in Iraq and as a result they do not necessarily percieve themselves as 'defeated'. that being said, the vast majority of Iraqis are not in rebellion against us. Most recognize they need help and are prepared to work with us until their country is on its way to restorarion and they have acquired some measure of freedom, independence and self government. At that point they'll be happy if we leave, and we will be too.

378 hithere  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 3:59:47pm

Let's put Sherman and Peabody in the way back machine, set the dial for 1775, send them to Parliament with the sensitivity training handbook, and see if Carter is right.

George III; W., the third US President named George. Coincidence?

379 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:01:28pm

373 Mr Pol

not sure about the eurabians but it really began as a tax issue. As far back as the early 1800s the federal gov got 85% of its operating capital from taxes on the agrarian south and basically none on the industry of the north. this taxation increased to about 50 % by the mid 1800s. After struggling under taxes this high when the abolitionalist came along, the south saw themselvles being unable to make it without that workforce and so it was on from there. However, 95% of the soldiers never owned slaves. Like my ancestors they were dirt pooor farmers who only saw their land being invaded.

380 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:02:59pm

#377 John Steele

RE: Iraq's Conversion and an American Exit

Most recognize they need help and are prepared to work with us until their country is on its way to restorarion and they have acquired some measure of freedom, independence and self government. At that point they'll be happy if we leave, and we will be too.

I wish I could share your rosey optimism on the subject.
I have a client/contractor right now in Najaf. His read is we are in this for 20 years at least, unless Syria, Saudi Arabia Lebanon, and Iran are also invaded, the guilty punished and a new democracy takes over in each.

Not likely.

381 Havoc  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:07:03pm

#378 Hithere

George III; W., the third US President named George. Coincidence?

hmmm, ooo,...Spooky eh?

382 LarryW2LJ  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:07:22pm

What a freakin' moron! And to think there was a time in my life that I actually respected this wing-nut!

Had the British Parliament been a little more sensitive to the colonial’s really legitimate complaints

Echo syndorme of Kerry's vow to fight a "more sensitive" war on terror? What the hell we gonna do - change the Islamists diapers and give them some nice, warm milkie-wilkie?

I'm gonn hurl - I'm gonna do it!

383 wiseoldfool  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:07:58pm

Jimmy Carter 2004 = Neville Chamberlain 1938

384 JohnSteele  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:12:02pm

#380 Havoc

I'm not sure it will be when you or I might consider it done, but rather when they think they are ready. I'd hazard a guess that will happen sooner than the former.

It might very well be 20 years to reach real success, but I think they and us will be ready long before it looks like Switzerland.

And. I'd venture that in the long pull we will be there a long time --- with basing rights, not occupation duties.

I may have 'rosy optimism' but I prefer it that way, gives you something to work toward.

385 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:17:17pm

#379 Stonewall

IIRC taxes themselves were but a consequence, actually - the Union needed the foreign currency that came from Southern exports. Hence the high taxes.

Anyway, my knowledge of the Civil War is very limited, despite the lessons to be learned from it. It's just that I resent excusing racism and slavery to further an anti-American agenda.

386 jlfintx  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:23:18pm

That guy is a total waste of oxygen. What a space puppy!

387 dougrhon  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:23:45pm

First of all, the Fiskie should be re-named the Jimmy.
I have had many thoughts about Jimmy lately. I am thinking he should give back his passport. He can move into the United Nations and become a citizen of the world. It is obvious that his thinking goes way beyond criticism of a specific policy and into the realm of anti-AMericanism. I cannot believe this man was elected president. The worst thing is when he finally shuffles off this mortal coil, he will be celebrated as a great humanitarian and he has been a disaster for this country in every conceivable way. He is a great fool.

388 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:24:29pm

#385 Mr Pol

Understood however, as a conserviative, you must understand the tax effect on the producer of goods. In fact when Lincolin saw the secession coming, his statement was " who will pay for our government." Being a conservative you must understand the complete unfairness of expecting us to fund every thing with no help from the north. To us we, the South were the slaves to the Union, if you get my drift.

389 Bryan Hiott  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:26:45pm

I just love it when Democratic lap dogs like Chris Matthews look upon such borderline demagogues as Jimmy Carter with admiring eyes. Matthews called Carter a historian. I was more irate some network talking head had the audacity to call ex-Klansman Rober Byrd of West Virginia the historian of the Senate simply because his speechwriters could throw in a few quotations by Cicero. Preposterous.

390 ubangi  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:27:44pm

Don't forget-this is the man that Kerry wanted as his Middle East envoy!

391 Cato the Elder  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:31:18pm

Wait a minute, Jimmy: Wouldn't that line of argument make you the former President of an unnecessary country?

392 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:32:16pm

#388 Stonewall

Oh, the taxes were unfair, no question about that. The foreign currency was needed to fund the industrialization of the Union, which was absolutely required. IMO grabbing those currencies through confiscatory policies was both unfair and very stupid, AND delayed industrialization of the South by at least a couple of decades. But I never expected a gov't to be fair, let alone smart...

393 Bryan Hiott  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:32:50pm

#390

That would have been unfortunate. Can you imagine Byrd's desperation upon learning that opossums aren't found in the Middle East?

394 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:33:12pm

"Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought."

I put on my DUnce rationalization cap and gave this some thought.
Maybe Peanut Boy is evaluating this according to the percentage of survivors at some point during his own lifetime.
When Carter was born, in 1924, there were still a few veterans of the Mexican War (1846-48) alive. There were still thousands of Civil War vets at that time (59 years after Appomattox, about comparable to our present historical distance from WW2).
The last Civil War veteran, John B. Salling (age 113), didn't pass away until 1959, btw.
That left only the Revolution and the War of 1812 with 100% death rates in 1924. Carter, historian that he is, probably knows that there were more participants in the Revolution, so naturally it qualifies as the bloodiest once the percentage tie causes the determination to accede to absolute numbers.

That completes tonight's lesson in looney left logic.

395 T. Jefferson  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:34:02pm

Jimmy Carter … where have I heard that name before? Oh yeah, wasn't he the Commander in Chief for that outstanding military victory – Operation Eagle Claw?

396 Pennies for Patriots  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:34:12pm

And perhaps if Britain hadn't murdered or marginalized so many of the Scots and Irish they would not have been so inclined to seek redress for the injustices imposed upon their forebearers as well as themselves.

What complete and utter fool, has Carter never opened a history book in his life.

The Revolutionary War was not a new war, it was just the closing chapter of a very long war.

The only way that ass could have a narrower vision would be to look down a length of garden hose.

397 Ojoe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:36:09pm

Oh, if the Brits had been more sensitive, oh, oh, oh, why we'd be stuck here also with Prince Charles and his Big Ears, and maybe all our motorcycles would leak oil, and the headlight would go out unexpectedly at night when there was no moon. Oh, such an un-necessary war! I hope this is the last comment!!

398 ubangi  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:38:21pm

#393 Bryan Hiott

No attack rabbits, either!

399 Catttt  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:38:22pm

I'm just want to mention that I e-mailed the Guardian UK writers a picture showing the Boston Tea Party, in response to their recent drive to tell Ohio how to vote. I wish I had a time machine and could send Carter back to that little incident in Boston. Maybe he'd learn a thing or two - - - naaah.

400 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:39:01pm

#397 Ojoe

all our motorcycles would leak oil

You owned a Triumph, too? :-)

401 Perpetual Student  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:43:20pm

The mid-term examination I will have tomorrow is an unnecessary one. Had I simply not enrolled in a Physics class, I would not be under the burden of having to study for it now.

...

402 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:44:32pm

Imagine this:
Could Lord Randolph Churchill really have married Jenny Jerome of New York if she had been a subject commoner rather than a citizen of a foreign country? I think not. He would have ended up with some thin-blooded girl of his own station, their son would have been a feeble-minded inbred fop rather than Winston Bloody Churchill, noone could have rallied the Brits against Hitler in 1940, and nazis would rule the world today.

403 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:45:34pm

# 392 Mr Pol

I have enjoyed discussing this with you Mr Pol I sincerly hope that you will trust or look into some of the things I have said. The Southern Soldier is one of the most patriotic in our history. He cared little of slavery but sought to defend his home from invasion. And while the North had 3 times the manpower and all the industrial might, the Southern soldier held the field until about 1863. A remarkable acheivement for a rag tag army without even any shoes. And when we look at the constitutional issues such as can be found in the ideology of "in the course of human events" etc etc. The question must be asked, Did this constitution apply to just 1776 or beyond? It is the deeper constitutional issues of self determination that are most concerning to me.

404 AllanTheRed  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:48:28pm

Instead of wasting time on Jimmy Carter, and his appeasement BS go to href="[Link: www.rememberingseptember11.com...] target="_blank">Remember 9/11 and why we need GW

405 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:50:10pm
I wish I had a time machine and could send Carter back to that little incident in Boston. Maybe he'd learn a thing or two - - - naaah.

Cattt: If Carter's ancestors had thought like he does, they would have headed to Canada with all the other Loyalists.

Such a shame that that didn't happen. He could have become Prime Minister of Canada instead (he would have been no worse for them than that other asshat they elected, Pierre Trudeau) and saved the rest of us a heap o' misery.

406 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:51:26pm

jhimmy cater is suffering from what is called in polite Baptist circles a 'Messiah' complex...

He believes to his core that it is his G-D given responsibilty to model his interpretation of Jesus Christ in order to bring salvation to the world through the elimination of ALL conflict...

He is WAY BEYOND a 'normal' MOONBAT...

He has become an even larger embarrasment as an X-President than he was as a failed President...

407 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:51:53pm

There is only one way I can explain a Carter Presidency.

Too many of us were doing coke back in the '70's.

408 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:54:42pm

#403 Stonewall

I will look into it - while we were discussing I bought a couple of books about the Civil War on Amazon :-)

The constitutional issue I plan to avoid, though: it's not that I am not concerned about it, it's just that I can imagine what Comrade Ketchup and his fellow LLL would do with it...

409 johnCV  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:58:02pm

358 BenJeremy

Carter is like a one-man-France... he's left a legacy that America has spent over two decades cleaning up, and is directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans.

Well put.

Carter exemplifies everything wrong with the liberal left. A figurehead of a corrupt and bankrupt ideology that worships at the of itself.

He is a disgrace and a national embarassment. He should be aired on every radio/TV station every day and allowed to speak freely that people can witness this travesty.

410 DocDublU  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:58:57pm

Seriously Charles, it's not nice to expose and exploit those suffering from early onset dimensia. We all rip on Michael Moore for his poor taste in badgering an obviously dottering Moses in "Bowling". It's quite clear that Mr. Carter has driven his trolly round the bend and ain't coming back to the whistle stop. I suspect this is his last major interview before retiring to his underground nuclear submarine and missle silo buried thoudands of feet below his mild mannered peanut farm in Plains. mmmyaaahhahahahahahaha! They all laughed at me at the academy...I'll prove them all wrong! mmmyahahahahahaha!

411 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 4:59:46pm

#379 Stonewall

Absolutely correct. My ancestors were dirt poor citrus farmers far removed from those huge cotton plantations...but they fought hard in the war. It was about taxation. I still have a problem with taxation. Maybe it's a Southern thing!

412 applesweet  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:01:17pm

Pennies for Patriots #396

The only way that ass could have a narrower vision would be to look down a length of garden hose.

And that's with both eyes at the same time!

413 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:06:07pm

Dementia seems to have set in early for Jimmuh.
Does anyone else remember this amazing gaffe from 1978?

Jimmy Carter delivered a memorable oration at the funeral of former vice president and Democratic presidential nominee Hubert Horatio Humphrey in 1978.
"One of our nation's greatest leaders," Carter momentously declared, "was Hubert Horatio Hornblower..."

414 elandadem  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:06:39pm

Carter, once again, proves what an idiot he is. Canada and Australia did not have to fight for their independence because we did and Britain learned a lesson most fail to learn. For further enlightenment read "The March of Folly" by Barbara Tuchman. Some would say she was a kool-aid drinker, but she was nevertheless very coherent.

415 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:08:12pm

408 Mr Pol

Great Mr Pol, just remember that the victor writes the history books so depending on what you are reading it could have a Southern or Northern bent to it but becuse of the above it is most likely the later. If you wish to do any further research on the Southern side of the story one of the best Authors is Dr. Michael Hill. Also While I am strongly conservative, I am also strongly regional. while I support strongly our country! I will never turn my back on Dixie. As sentimentally foolish as it may sound, she is my love and my heart.

416 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:12:54pm

#411 Sarah D.

God Bless you. Ms O Hara would be proud of You. I Tip My hat to you Ma'am. Youre a Southern Flower ...you are.

417 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:19:51pm

Hmmm..400+ posts and counting. We can always depend on Carter to bring out the wrath of LFGers. It's not just his disastrous presidency, it's his disastrous post-presidency that is so galling.

You'd think that any man who presided over "stagflation", astronomical interest rates, malaise, the Iran debacle, the horribly botched hostage rescue attempt, and a demoralized military would shut up and build houses. But Carter has made a post-presidency career of attempting to undermine every Republican president, kowtowing to every Third World thug and trumpeting the virtues of Yassir Arafat.

418 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:20:17pm

#415 Stonewall

Good point... I bought this and this. Do you recommend something else?

419 Moe Katz  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:23:04pm

What is it with this groupthink here? Carter has a fair point, and he does correctly lay the blame on the British Parliament, not the American colonists.

420 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:23:56pm

Well, before I go all the way to the top to read the whole thread, I have to boast.

Yes, I stood out in the 35 degree heat, outdoors, in the hot October sun, for almost an hour, to do early voting. I voted the straight Republican ticket, except, to my horror, I discovered that re-districting has put me in Sheila Jackson Lee's district, and she had no Republican opponent, so I voted Libertarian.

Sheila was the one who complained about the "lily white" names for hurricanes. Personally, I think a "Hurricane Antwon" or "Hurricane Jamal" would be kinda cool.


BTW, I did the early voting at the "Barbara Bush-Cypress Creek" branch of the Harris County Public Library, where, btw, I have checked out books about weather.

421 flyboy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:25:07pm

I profoundly feel that ex-President Carter's brain (?) has been impacted by his own peanuts!

422 Moe Katz  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:29:00pm

Prince Charles recently claimed that King George would have sailed over to America to smoothe over the differences with the colonists but became too ill for the voyage.

423 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:30:05pm

#418 Mr Pol

Those are great. The only other one I would recommend off the top of my head would be one called "The south was right" I know it is carried by Barnes and Nobles but not sure about Amazon.
However, thanks for indulging me. It really is a passion of mine to show my ancestors were the most honorable of men and that they fought for the independence of the south and not for the institution of slavery. Having at least 5 members of my family in battles from Gettysburg to Chicamauga and having an uncle who as a medal of honor winner. Their Honor is of the utmost importance to me. Thanks you sir for your indulgence.

424 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:34:56pm

#416 Stonewall

Why thank you sir!

I remember seeing a boxed set of books in an old bookstore years ago...it was a "letters home from the soldiers" type thing. As I recall it was two hardback books (of course that could have changed with later printings). I have tried to find it again, and kick myself for not buying it then. Any ideas about finding this?

BTW - these were Confederate soldiers.

425 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:35:32pm

#423 Stonewall

Full disclosure: I lived 7 months in Dalton, GA... :-)

426 tankdemon  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:37:17pm

Does Jimmy realize that Canada and Australia (not positive about this one, but probably also India) are still part of the British Empire, still loyal subject of the queen. To say we would have gotten independance as they did is truly to show a lack of understanding of history and the world.

427 Edward  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:38:02pm

OK, I'm writing as a loyal subject of the Queen, and one whose sympathies in the 1776 affair are with the Loyalists -

CARTER HAS LOST HIS MIND!

Whether or not the Revolutionary War was necessary or not, whether it was avoidable or not -

Where is the parallel with what's happening in Iraq???

Oh, there's an insurgency there, and there was an insurgency in the southern colonies, so it's just the same, is it?

[calming self]

If we need historical parallels, try this: Jimmy Carter and William Ewart Gladstone. Carter can't tell the difference between an American rebel and an Islamist terrorist. Gladstone couldn't tell the difference between an Irish Home-Ruler and a Mahdist fanatic. In either case, it's the sort of blindness that leads to Third-world populations being abandoned to years of blood and horror, all in the name of high-minded liberal principles. If Carter had his way, as Gladstone did, the West would doubtless abandon Iraq as Gladstone did the Sudan, and death and slavery for the local people would be the result again.

If history teaches us anything, it is that doctrinaire liberals should never, ever be allowed to decide the fates of nations.

If Carter teaches us anything, it is that liberals are incapable of learning from history.

428 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:38:40pm

Mr Pol

Sleep callls so I must go; but below I leave you a quote from that day and time. Please read it slowly and disect its meanings. It believe it will impress you in terms of integrity. God Bless and you see you on the blog of blogs later on.

429 dustyroadguy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:38:45pm

ed

hurricane Pdiddy
hurricane SnoopDog
hurricane IceTea
hurricane emem
hurricane Fat Albert

Thank you for voting...you have my simpathy
SHEILA...OMG, did you see any of the observers she requested?

430 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:39:21pm

"I am with the South in life or in death, in victory or in defeat... I believe the North is about to wage a brutal and unholy war on a people who have done them no wrong, in violation of the Constitution and the fundamental principles of government. They no longer acknowledge that all government derives its validity from the consent of the governed. They are about to invade our peaceful homes, destroy our property, and inaugurate a servile insurrection, murder our men and dishonor our women. We propose no invasion of the North, no attack on them, and only ask to be left alone."
~~Major General Patrick Cleburne C.S.A.

431 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:40:12pm

“He was overwhelmed with a feeling of tenderness, and was also aroused sexually, which his tight trousers made obvious to both of them.”

432 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:42:05pm

424 Sarah D.

I have seen some of those letters on the net but not sure where you might find the book. I will be glad to look around. If i find em I will hunt you down On LGF

433 Tats66  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:45:51pm

Why does anything that this inbred peanut farmer, who by the way is THE MOST EMBARRASINGLY SORRY EXCUSE FOR A PRESIDENT WE EVER HAD, WHO EMBOLDENED OUR ENEMIES JUST BY HIS PRESENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE (HMMM, LIKE KERRY?) says???

434 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:46:26pm

425 Mr Pol

Full Disclosure:

Born and Bred in the first state to secede (SC). Have lived here most of my life (45 yr).

Deo Vindice!

435 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:46:49pm

#430 Stonewall

Amen. And maybe some other time we can discuss what led up to this...and what it created.

Good night sir.

436 indy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:48:07pm

My family and I live in the South, & most of my us think Jimmah is a freakin idiot who has more teeth than brains; just shows what happens when you smoke peanut shells...

as for sensitivity, bleeagh. I was in middle school in 1980 when Ronald Reagan was inaugurated and remember the Iran hostages being released after 400+ days when Jimmah left the white house. Who do YOU think the islamofascists were more afraid of?

437 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:49:22pm

#434 Stonewall

BTW if you're still up, I am a pioneer family of Florida. We were here before it became a state...and damned proud of it!

438 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:50:25pm

Stonewall: I am a Yankee (although not a "damned" one, I hope:-) who has lived down South (well, in Northern Florida, which is a darned sight more southern than Southern Florida, anyway. I don't really count Alexandria, VA as "southern"), I've always been interested in the South and this puzzles me: In my observation, Southerners tend to be fiercely patriotic as well as very loyal to their region. I've never quite understood how people who were rather eager to get out of the Union back in the 1860's developed such a strong national attachment.

Jimmah Peanut has always struck as a most uncharacteristic Southerner, because he's actually anti-American. (Think of that! An anti-American ex-President:-(

439 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:50:44pm

No observers.

But they did have voting instructions in English, Spanish and Vietnamese.


Personally, especially here in Texas, I'd think we'd just have voting instructions in English.

I'm not trying to be insensitive, but I don't think one should be granted citizenship (and hence the right to vote) w/o the ability to speak American English.


On the other hand, I will say my neighborhood is chock full of pupuserias, taqueria and pho houses, and I do appreciate the diversity of food.


Saw 2 Muslim woman at the polls, one just the head scarf, the other in the full head to toe black Batsuit.


I'll get peeed if they start offering voting instructions in Arabic.

440 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:53:30pm

435 Sarah D.

could think of no other I would rather discuss it with Sarah D. and may the gentility of the old south find you and pamper you wherever you go.

Hat Tip /

441 grayp  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:54:59pm

Stonewall

It really is a passion of mine to show my ancestors were the most honorable of men and that they fought for the independence of the south and not for the institution of slavery.

Your ancestors were most certainly honorable. And States Rights is to this day one of the values I find most precious in our country.

But it is unavoidable that States' Rights was invoked to protect the institutionalization of slavery - among other things, I grant. You cannot read the history of this country, the letters of the Founding Fathers and not know that this was the sore that would not heal. The sore left to fester for the children to resolve because other issues had to be settled first. And I would posit this question: If the States that formed the Confederacy had agreed to give up slavery, would there have been a war?

442 Ojoe  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:55:19pm

While we are on England here, a note to all Northern Californians ... we are living here on land that by one measure belonged to England, in its glory days (may it have more) because Drake, yes El Draque, who singed the beard of the king of Spain, did also sail his gold-laden ship along the shore here, and claimed this place for the Queen of England, the one who had real balls, Elizabeth Tudor! So there! I think of Drake and Elizabeth as parallels to the arrows and the olive branch on the great seal of the USA, each necessary, and impossible without the other. Good Night, all.

443 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 5:59:07pm

Memories of Jimmuh -

-Those horrible teeth.

-The "Montezuma's Revenge" incident in Mexico.

-"The Moral Equivalent of the War in Iraq" (OK, I added the last two words.)

-"Malaise"

I do give him credit for Airline Deregulation and appointing Paul Volkler, though.

444 RayH  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:01:26pm

We're talking ifs here. Big ifs. If King George lll had been more sensitive to the needs of the colonists there wouldn't have been a war. Such as not adding the Tea Tax. Or the Stamp Tax or trying to take the guns away from the colonists. Then yeah the war wouldn't have occured. But those things happened.
Perhaps in that alternate universe where part of Jimmah's brain exists it did happen. But not here.
20/20 hindsight over 200 years after the fact is not actually a sign of great wisdom. His legacy just keeps growing and is endangering America and the world today.
Iran and North Korea are getting ready for nuclear war. If Jimmah had been less gullible and more sensitive to the fact that ayatollahs are completely mad, he would have helped bolster the Shah to put down the fundamentalist revolution. I like to believe that most if not all of the world's terrorist problems wouldn't exist had he done that. And his brilliance in helping negotiate North Korea's acquiring the nuclear technology need for bombs.
Wonder what future historians will say to that.

445 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:01:42pm

Ed Moran, #420

Now that Sheila Jackson Lee is your Congresswoman you might want to get serious about seceding from her district. OTOH, you can look forward to Hurricane Tupac.

Stonewall, #430

Pat Cleburne, Irish immigrant, Southern partiot and soldier---one of the best. I wonder what might have happened if his idea of recuriting Black soldiers had been heeded by Jefferson Davis.

446 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:05:00pm

#441 grayp

Your question was not pointed at me, so forgive me for intruding...but yes...there would have still been a war had the South agreed to give up slavery.

IF by chance the government would have relinquished the South from taxes for a period of readjustment...then maybe not. But that was never offered.

The war was about taxation, and asking the South to fork over more taxes while giving up what made them able to pay the taxes was the problem. I'm not arguing the slavery issue here, I'm stating an economic fact of the times as they were.

447 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:06:47pm

#438 It's Miss Donna V. to you

No ma'am, you are not a Yankee, you are a northerner. the diff is that a Northerner moves down here, has a diff accent but loves the area and melts in. A Yankee is one who moves down here and immediately starts telling us " thats not how we did it up North"! And of course the response is I 40 west or I 95 North...pick one.

I can't really explain the quandry you present. Yes we did want out and we lost over 200.000 men in the effort. Our homes and families were burned out by Shermans troops and we barley survived. But we believe in fighting for our homes or homeland even if we where held in this country by force of arms. We are Patriotic but will always yearn for Dixie's own rule, the CSA (if you will). We will always honor the cause for which they fought (that cause was independence). We lost but what better country to lose to?

448 Frank IBC  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:08:39pm

Hurricane Fat Albert

Oh G-d, I'm going to still be getting the giggles from that one at work tomorrow.

Also, "Hurricane Aunt Esther".

449 Mr. Willard  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:09:48pm

"I signed the Declaration of Independence before I erased my name from it"

/Loyalist John Kerry, misreading the tea leaves in 1776

450 Sol Roth  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:10:53pm

Carter continues to be a plague on rationality. Goodness grief, what a fuming, flaming idiot.

I'll save the electrons on Matthews Lenin.

451 HULUGU  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:11:11pm

chris matthew thinks we are fighting nationalists in iraq--al tikriti facists and islamist jihadis as well as gangsters and theocrats of all kinds escape his LLL vision--too much blonde hair dye has fucked up whatever intelligence he once had--and let's not forget he once was one of jimmuh carter's speechwriters--how this dingbat gets two shows to display his ignorance is beyond me--talk fast talk nonsense and be connected--he jumped the shark with the afghanistan quagmire and will self destruct in 5..4..3..

452 dbdukes  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:12:43pm

#438 It's Miss Donna V. to you

I've never quite understood how people who were rather eager to get out of the Union back in the 1860's developed such a strong national attachment.

IMHO it is an error to assume that those in the South were "eager to get out of the union" -- but they weren't afraid to. Southerners have stong beliefs. Whether we're right or wrong, we feel strongly about it.

#441 grayp

If the States that formed the Confederacy had agreed to give up slavery, would there have been a war?

Don't lose sight of the fact that, while not abolishing slavery, the Constitution of the CSA abolished the slave trade. I may be wrong, but I have thought the South recognized the need to get rid of slavery. The issue was the how long it would take to happen.

453 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:18:14pm

Just found this: according to a bill for a celebration party thrown on Sept. 15th, 1787, the 55 framers of the U.S. Constitution drank 54 bottles of Madeira, 60 bottles of claret, 8 bottles of whiskey, 22 bottles of port, 8 bottles of cider, 12 bottles of beer, and 7 large bowls of spiked punch big enough "that ducks could swim in them." Sixteen players provided the background music for the bash. This would appear to explain why the Constitution was signed on the 17th, and not the 16th, of September.

454 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:18:54pm

#447 stonewall

Sherman, the American Attila. Ante bellum he spent a lot of time in the South and respected its people and culture---but he made hard war. When he tried to make a generous peace settlement with Joe Johnston, he was denounce by Stanton and the new administration.

P.S. my sister and brother in law now live in North Carolina, they love it. They enjoy the open and friendly people, the climate and the "Carolina blue sky".

455 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:18:57pm

441 grayp

Can't prove either way but can go so far as to say that secession had been an option that was rearing its head as early as 1830 as a result of the taxation( long before abolition came along). Also remember that Lincloin didn't make it an issue until 1863 when the support for the war was failing amongst the populice. And even at that time he said " i would free all of the slaves, none of the slaves or some of the slaves if it will keep the union together". In that context he was not concerned about the slaves but the disolution of the union. And one last thing then I really must go to sleep, the emancipation proclamation only freed the laves of the South not the north. Think that part over.

God Bless see ya'll tommorow!

456 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:20:58pm
Northerner moves down here, has a diff accent

I have an accent???

;-D

457 Stonewall  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:23:53pm

#456 It's Miss Donna V. to you

Not for long suga we'll have you drinking mint julips and whistling Dixie before ya'll can hear the bowleevil knawing on da cotton all da live long day.

458 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:26:11pm

Stonewall: LOL! Goodnight, y'all!!

459 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:27:42pm

Donna V., #456

I have an accent?

Although I now live in Wisconsin, I was born in NYC and moved back and forth between the city and its suburbs. People in Milwaukee think I talk like Joe Pesci in "My Cousin Vinny".

460 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:31:06pm

We're clever in Texas.

The Confederate flag flies in the south end of the stadium every Texas Longhorns home game.

But only the wise know, because it is the actual Confederate flag, which sort of looks like the US flag, but different, not the Confederate battle flag.

(IIRC, they developed the Confederate battle flag so popular at Nascar races, because the actual Confederate flag was difficult to distinguish from the US flag from a distance, causing confusion)

461 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:31:59pm

#459 Paul

Yeah, and the people in Wisconsin are the fastest talkers on the damned continent. Must be the beer and cheese. I drove them crazy..they kept trying to finish my sentences for me!

462 It's Miss Donna V. to you  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:34:21pm

Paul: Talking like Joe Pesci might come in handy in Milwaukee, especially if you visit the East Side and are accosted by Moveon dolts on the street.

"Vote for Kerry? Fuggitaboutit, moonbat!"


:-)

463 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:36:12pm

Stonewall,
The Southern states seceded because of Lincoln's opposition to slavery. That was the only real reason the South seceded. If they had stayed, they prolly could have prolonged slavery into the 20th century since Lincoln would have only used legal means to stop slavery and that would have taken decades. The War was about slavery, state's rights is just a paper rationalization. Lincoln used save teh Union appraoch at first because emancipation was not a populist issue at first. But he never wavered in his belief that slavery was an evil and the war was his opportunity to rid the US of the fatal compromise!

464 Lewis  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:36:21pm

Yep, Carter, the worst President of my lifetime.

I used to think that he'd found redemption in his good works post-Presidency - that, while he was a terrible President, he had become a great ex-President.

Boy was I wrong.

This man is a dangerous idiot whose political opinions deserve negative weight. Just shut up and build another house, Jimmah!

465 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:36:57pm
466 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:39:18pm

#463 Jakester

Er, No. It wasn't about slavery to begin with.

If you believe it to be please post the links...because all of the history I have studied does not agree with your assessment.

467 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:40:14pm

Actually, Sherman caused very few casualties for both sides in his March to the Sea. There were a fraction of the casualties for his whole campaign compared to a blood bath like Shiloh!

468 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:44:20pm

Sarah,
Before the South secceeded, they realized the balance of federal power was shifting to the free states. They vowed secession if Lincoln was elected because of Lincoln's hatred of slavery. Slavery was the core of the issue, all the others were peripheral. If it was just state's rights, why didn't any free states secceed? I really don't have time to hunt links down, but that is a respectable and accepted historical viewpoint!

469 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:46:35pm

I miss-spelled, it's seceded!

470 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:47:03pm

#468 Jakester

but that is a respectable and accepted historical viewpoint!

I disagree, but how about I hunt you down tomorrow to hash it out...I have to get to bed!

'Night!

471 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:48:48pm

What's the point? If you feel slavery wasn't the real reason for the Civil War, there's no point in arguing any longer.

472 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:50:06pm

Back to topic:
Carter, go build a house and shutup. Pleeze!

473 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:50:28pm

Fine. Then you are wrong. Period.

Glad we had this discussion.

/sarc

474 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:51:06pm

Sarah, what is the reason, just for curiosity?

475 Paul  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:52:30pm

Donna V., #462

accosted by Moveon dolts.

That actually happened! One warm Saturday in September I was coming out of Beans and Barley and was accosted by a daffy co-ed selling cookies to raise money for Moveon. I did avoid a confrontation (seeing that I was in enemy territory) but I didn't buy any damn cookies.

476 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:53:30pm

Taxation. As has been stated before on this thread. Taxation.

477 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:55:04pm

#471 Jakester

Read the previous discussion. The industrialization of the Union absolutely needed the foreign currency from the cotton crops. Confiscatory tax policies were in place that made impossible for the South to survive without slave labor. So they were backed into a corner from which they felt secession was the only way out. Had it been possible to lower the taxes and abolish slavery over 10 years or so, history would have been different.

478 Sarah D.  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:58:37pm

Thank you Mr. Pol! It's late and I'm too tired to expound!

479 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:59:17pm

#478 Sarah D.

It's early here - 6 am :-)

480 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 6:59:29pm
481 Portia  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:01:58pm

451, Mr. Pol

Just found this: according to a bill for a celebration party thrown on Sept. 15th, 1787, the 55 framers of the U.S. Constitution drank 54 bottles of Madeira, 60 bottles of claret, 8 bottles of whiskey, 22 bottles of port, 8 bottles of cider, 12 bottles of beer, and 7 large bowls of spiked punch big enough "that ducks could swim in them." Sixteen players provided the background music for the bash. This would appear to explain why the Constitution was signed on the 17th, and not the 16th, of September.

Does anyone know if this was a Friday night? I think we just found evidence of early Lizardoid Founding Fathers.

P.

482 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:04:27pm

There was no income tax then, most federal taxes were derived from customs and liquor. So how were the taxes, since federal government was so tiny, so onerous? Facts and figures? Industrialization was funded by private investors, with the state's kicking in for canals and railroads here and there. The federal government was very small then.

483 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:04:35pm

#480 Iron Fist

Probably what would have happened under President Lee, had the South won.

I am not sure - those foreign currencies were absolutely needed to industrialize. The way I understand it, the whole Union had painted itself into a corner. Slavery had to go, but at the same time, revenue from slave labor had to stay. Frankly, I don't think there was a way out.

484 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:08:05pm

#481 Portia

It was a Saturday :-)

485 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:09:14pm

#482 Jakester

Export tariffs. And it wasn't so 'tiny'.

486 Jakester  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:09:26pm

The govenment was not funding industrialization. Foreign and domestic investors were. The federal government collected tariffs, kept a small army and navy and ran a federal bank back then. Oh, they built a few roads too!

487 Ol' Southern Boy  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:20:21pm

I think it's age-related. Dementia is setting in.

488 Mr Pol  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:26:47pm

#486 Jakester

I don't know. I read all this in Daniel Boorstin's The National Experience, but it's mostly an introductory text. It also claims government aids for industrialization were massive and cites Whitley's funding as an example. I've ordered a book on the tax aspects of the Civil War, as soon as I've read it I'll give you an answer.

489 NeonZebra  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:31:18pm

Hey Jimmy, come over here for a minute! Yup, just like I though. Somebody screwed your head on backwards.

490 The Sanity Inspector  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 7:31:29pm

#241 Jheka

Even when the Soviet Union was collapsing from the inside, Carter gave them hope. In the late 70's, the Kremlin seriously thought that they might prevail in the cold war. And so did the White House.

And not only that, Carter was genuinely shocked when Brezhnev rolled into Afghanistan. How could any American President be as shocked as he was, at that late stage in Soviet history? What a naif!

This terrific post by retired SEAL Matthew Heidt reminds me of another reason I disliked Carter. Heidt says that Bush has quietly slipped the Special Forces off the leash and is letting them do their jobs to the hilt. But it's secret work, so Bush doesn't trumpet it. I contrast this with Carter, outing the existence of the Stealth bomber project, for election purposes in 1980.

491 DANEgerus  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:04:17pm

The amazing thing is that besides discarding the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, as if those documents didn't inspire the French revolution and dozens of other freedom movements...

Does anybody really believe that after 175 years of British domination the might and manpower of the USA wouldn't have been exploited by the UK... in say...

The Crimean War? World War I? World War II?

We wouldn't have been late... we would have been there day one in all three and that would have cost millions of American lives defending British empire...

Compared to the total lost in all of America's wars of about one million.

So thanks Jimmuh for wishing millions of lives lost upon your country.

492 Texas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:14:02pm

Jimmah Cahtah has indeed been spending too much time with Michael Moore and if we had just left well enough alone, Hitler would have fallen without us getting involved. Right. The scary thing however, is that Carter's alter ego, John Kerry, is way too close to the presidency. Get out and work for Bush!

493 jaybird  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:14:04pm

The amazing part of it is that Carter is an Annapolis grad. You'd think that somewhere along the way to getting a BS degree there he would've been exposed to a class that studied the several major wars that the US has been in over the last 230 years, what the issues were, how they were fought, casualties and such data. Maybe he knew it once and forgot.

494 Texas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:17:37pm

#493 Maybe he was inattentive to his history lessons.

495 Galactic Jello  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:26:38pm

#243 Al

Your numbers seem low.

Why do they seem low?

They are the exact numbers you link to...

496 Texas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:28:22pm

I just read a story on the Belarussian Government breaking up a small anti-government rally in the capital of Minsk, putting several people in the hospital. I lived there for four years running a small humanitarian aid ministry. It is a sad commentary that the last totalitarian government in Europe is able to inflict it's horror on a very sweet people. Alexander Lukashenko, a former Soviet apparatchik, has governed Belarus with an iron fist for 10 years. May that mistreated people eventually be able to enjoy true freedom. This seemed kind've appropriate in light of our conversation on the USA gaining freedom from another tyrant long ago.

497 Galactic Jello  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:30:51pm

#253 Al

Apologies to you GJ. Upon further review your numbers appear to very accurate, but the site I referenced above contains other detail for those interested.

Guess I should read the next 100 posts before I reply...

:)

498 QueenEsther  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 8:47:40pm

Carter and Arafat: A near-surreal lovefest

The following episode begins on January 19, 1996, a day before Palestinian Authority elections that Carter was to monitor.

That evening Jimmy and Rosalynn headed to Gaza City to have dinner with Arafat and his American-born wife, Suha. The evening turned into a near-surreal lovefest: as Arafat's pink-jumpsuited baby daughter bounced on Jimmy's knee, the two statesmen reminisced about Carter's days in the White House and about their first meeting in Paris in 1990. To Carter, the Palestinian election was the capstone on his post-presidential efforts to fulfill the promise of the Camp David accords; for his part, Arafat kept repeating how his return to Gaza City would not have been possible without Carter's "persistent efforts toward our cause."

499 Texas  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:04:54pm

#81 Way too funny! LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

500 nvdoyle  Tue, Oct 19, 2004 9:21:52pm

History's. Greatest. Monster.

501 hoyden  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:18:40am

38: ...throw off the yolk of tryanny, ...

Those tyrannical yolks are really messy when they're sunny side up!

/thinking out loud

502 ang2004  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 1:11:11am

What a wuss this guy is!!! Jimmy Carter is an absolute disgrace to this entire country-a candy ass if I ever saw one. He could not do anything about the hostages in Iran but they damn near threw those hostages out when Reagan was sworn in. They knew they were in serious trouble once Reagan got the power. This guy can't be a Christian--must be a muslim hiding in a Baptist Church. My, my and to think we could still be trying to win the peace with the beloved Hitler. Then instead of 50 stars on our flag we could have 50 little swastikas. Jimmy must be developing Alzheimer's(or maybe he has always had it).

503 Nathan  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:07:16am

As a Georgian, I apologise...
Guess being a Brit would have been better...uh did Jimmy mention the looting of Ireland which had the forefathers concerned, looting India, looting just about anyopne in the way.
So Jimmy wants us to consider kneeling to a King...prefers Royalty. If we had only been more patience. Revolutionary War - "Wrong War, Wrong Time, I would have done everything differently..."
I prefer Steven Decatur - when asked to bow to I believe the sultan of Tripoli ( or something like that) - "An American bows to no one but God."

Idiot

504 Jakester  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:32:21am

No doubt taxes had a role, but that was an example of the infighting between the states that was ultimately based on the free-slave divide. I will check out your cited text. But the South had representation in Congress, unlike the Colonials b4 1776, and they could always sell their cotton to the Northern mills, so it wasn't the massive hardship you described. It would be like saying Hitler invaded Poland because of the Danzing Corridor disputes, not a root cause.

505 mrmarble  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:37:51am

It is HARD to believe that this twit was the President. My head hurts just thinking about this boobs comments.

506 leo (dissident view from Berlin)  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:41:39am

The trick of Mr. Carters success is that he is a retired politician who deals with countries where they don't have retired politicians. I doubt that many North Koreans ever have heard that there are nations in the world which limit the number of a politician's terms. This allows the leaders of the die-in-office countries to lie to themselves and their peoples that he was still representing his government at least on a honorary parking post. And playing the prop in other nations' fantasy ideologies gives Mr. Carter the possibility to lie to himself that he had made diplomatic achievements, so it's a win-win deal.

507 cybermonk  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 2:47:49am

I think Jimmy deserves a "lifetime Achievement" Award
for the Idiotarian Award, perhaps even having it named after him, such as the "Jimmy Carter Idiot of the Year Award."

:)

508 leo (dissident view from Berlin)  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:08:33am

#373 Mr Pol 10/19/2004 05:44PM PST:

Lots of LLLs in Europe are now saying the Civil War was sparked only by economical concerns, slavery was just used as an excuse ...

So said the then European governments, whose imminent diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy might have turned the balance in favor of the South, if the Lincoln administration had not preempted it with the emancipation proclamation. It is a great irony that the LLL now says exactly the opposite of what Karl Marx argued in his contemporary coverage of that war... must have been a bloody imperialist warmonger, that London-based pro-Lincoln freelance journalist.

509 Jakester  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:39:59am

Leo,
thanx, the economic argument for the cause of the Civil War is part and parcel with the trashing of America. By making it seem that some cabal of Northern capitalists started the war for profit, it denigrates the idealism of America. This basterdized version of history got accepted not only because of the Marxists in academia, but with the help of Southern apologists who wanted some romanticized, heroic view of the South that ignored the barbarity of slavery and the contradiction between slavery and the ideals of the Declaration and the Constitution. So you had this view of heroic Southerners fighting for their freedom versus the greedy Northerners fighting for profits with made both the America haters and the Southerners happy! Unfortunately, the black left, no friends of America, uses the same argument, any argument that denigrated America and makes us look greedy and selfish is okay with the L³'s!

510 Mardukhai  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 3:51:39am

Jimmuh may be a total loon, but as a historian, let me put my own 2 cents in:

Oddly, the Revolutionary War might REALLY have been unnecesary because the British completed the development of the parliamentary system within a few years. By 1800, the British prime minister was responsible to parliament and had to resign without a majority.

All English-speaking colonies had similar "responsible governments" shortly after.

The US and Canada would never have been divided, and given the relative strength of American and England, we would have been the tail wagging their dog by 1820 or 1830.

There would have been no Civil War, too.

511 SeanGleeson  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:05:22am
512 leo (dissident view from Berlin)  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:26:37am

#509 Jakester - The postmodernist left must rewrite Marx just like the politbüros retouched photographs because there is a parallel between the then war on slavery and the current war on theocracy. The Islamic terrorists still have the strategic advantage of a downhill battle, such as the Confederacy before the Emancipation Proclamation. They only need to prolong the status quo and wait for a diplomatic catastrophy between the European and the Islamic states to happen. The Lincoln administration understood that slowly phasing out slavery such as the colonial powers had done was a dead end, and that going on the offensive and freeing the slaves was the only option to preempt the then imminent diplomatic catastrophy. We might see this parallel fully unfold when the Bush administration succeeds to dismantle the last remnants of the Carter Doctrine and get the case of the Iranian theocracy to the Security Council.

513 Jakester  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 4:33:57am

But the "Greedy North" view of the Civil War was well accepted because the normally conservative South found it redeeming, it turned their sordid defence of slavery into a war of freedom from economic centralism! that view was one of the first revisionist histories to gain some acceptance in the US .

514 C-Low  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:10:34am

Carter is a freekin RETARD who has no grasp of history and needs to go back to school.

the Civil War was Americas bloodiest war by far

Canada got thier freedom by peaceful means but I suspect the Monroe doctrine from america played a mojor part in the British not really wanting to have a war in the americas. Example of why not to Spanish American War.

India and the other birtish colonies didnt get thier freedom until after WW2 which Rosevelt had tagged into the garantee of support for Britian during the meeting Chruchil and Rosevelt had off the coast of Canada on a warship before america even entered the war when Churchil was still begging our entrance Roosevelt got a condition of British giving up her empire. Not well publisized but it happened.

So in my opinion if America didnt revolt the British empire would still be here today. It was our victory then our leadership and example that allowed and embolden the other colonies to do the same.

People like Carter hate america and just cant face the fact that without America the world would be nothing like it is today. France Britian Spain and maybe Germany Russia would rule the entire world in some form of empire to this day. Kings and Queens would still rule the day. The reality is that america is truly a great nation that is the only nation to do things such as war the most costly thing a nation can take on for the benifit of others and on even demand reward or repreations. America is the only nation that has literally conquered and had the entire world in her hand and rather than divide up into territorys give them all freedom. At the end of WW2 we were the only to have nukes we could have declared our World Dominance then but instead we gave freedom to W Europe much of Asia. Even today we invaded Iraq but instead of opening the oil wells and America taking and selling all of the oil until the troops could come home to pay for our war effort NO we not only are fitting the bill of the war and part of reconstruction but the oil being sold is financing the Iraqi gov. Carter just needs to face reality that america with all her faults is the most Fairest country (by her divrersity her at home in every major city you can find someone form every country on earth) the freeist (we even let known subversive elements not only speek but participate in gov like Carter) Non-Empireal (proven through example after example in our past) strogest most independent educated poeple (filtered through the sifter of Capatalism and froged hardened and driven by its sucess) Deliverer of Freedom (ask W & Europe the old Soviet Territories, Most of the Americas, Iraq, Afghanistan and the future) Every were america goes those nations thrive the countries who ally themselves and imulate our Capatilism and Democracy thrive. We are not only the leader of the world we are the World and the Example of what the rest of the world could accomplish just if they follow the example. We lead from the front in every catagory.Carter and the like are a hold out of a minority in this country that has been with us through the ages. Once called Communist, Socialist, Pacifist in the past they used these names openly today they only whisper these name but instead mislead us with name such as "progressive" "democratic" "Liberal"

515 deadonballs  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:27:38am

If I were a democrat, I would pay any amount of money to shut this guy up. How the fuck can he armchair quarterback the Revolutionary War? How can he speculate two hundred years back in time. Sure, I probably could have won the Crusades, the Vietnam War, and a whole slew of wars if I had years to look back on them -then have the ability of fantasizing the outcome. My God, what kind of fantasy world does this dipshit live in?I apologize for these unkind words about a former president, but my God, this guy could fuck up a cup of coffee when it comes to foreign policy. N. Korea, Haiti, Iran, Panama, East Timor, Nicaragua, this guy's resume just flat out sucks. He has pissed more money away on moral certitude and pacifism that it is a fucking miracle that anyone with a brain would even listen to this yo-yo.

Sorry for the expletives... It's just that everytime this ignorant old man talks on TV, I just want to reach through the screen and choke the son-of-a-bitch with my own two hands.

OK. I am fine now. Breathe. Count to ten. Thanks for listening. The check is in the mail.

516 Jakester  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:28:15am

D'Himmi Carter, that says it all!

517 thepoguemahone  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 5:49:05am

I saw some of this last night - Matthews actually asked him what he learned from the Iran Hostage Crisis and he listed 3 flaws of the Bush Admins handling of Iraq

What a dumbass

BOTH of them

Look Matthews - you want to be a big news boy - try forcing your liberal guests to answer a freakin question!

For Carter to be so dense as to not be able to name a lesson learned from the 444 days he let Americans languish in Iran is unbelievable

Heres a hint Dhimmi - the lesson is that the Islamo Facist's don't give a high holy crap for diplomacy and only relented with the inauguration of Ronald Reagan

518 McKinnon of that Ilk  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:35:30am

# 514
So in my opinion if America didnt revolt the British empire would still be here today. It was our victory then our leadership and example that allowed and embolden the other colonies to do the same.

Wow - it only took them 171 years before they acted on your example and felt emboldened.

Canada - only did it in 1982 - your neighbour obviouly wasn't emboldened at all. And we still appoint their Upper House, the Queen is on all their money, and the Governor General represents the Queen in all government affairs.

As you might say "WOOO!!! USA! USA! USA!"

519 leo (dissident view from Berlin)  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:37:04am

#513 Jakester - A proclamation to put it on track goes in a minute, but change often takes more time than you would want it to. The current German president still would have been elected with a vote from a war criminal had not the Wiesenthal Center intervened. Born on the rubble of the old racist South, a Jimmy Carter might suffer the same over-impartiality syndrome as the current European consensus - which has grown on the rubble of Nazism and thus imagines itself as the worlds probation officer when it fights the mirrors of its own dark past. But there is no such thing as a fresh start in history. After getting rid (or being ridded) of an evil there always follows an hangover. We only see the durations of these hangovers shrinking down from centuries to mere years as global communications is unfolding.

Europe still suffers a religious hangover from the totalitarian era of the Church which makes it blind to recognize theocracy in other cultures, and a colonial hangover that makes it give a benefit to the doubt to nations suitable as props for third world romanticism, which is all former colonies except the one that had become independent on its own. After the emergence of postmodernism in 1848 the Enlightenment in Europe was overshadowed by a recurrence of the one-church-state in the secular form of the one-party-state. In contrast, America came into existence only after the collapse of the Roman theocracy and through the collapse of colonialism. Thus America can answer to the Islamic threat even though there is a Jimmy Carter while Europe is helpless.

See the diplomatic catastrophy looming on the horizon:
EU on Iran nukes: "Only time will tell"

520 GoodOne  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:37:09am

Jimmy C..."I actually did vote for the Revolutionary War...before I voted against it.

Idiot

521 Owl  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:48:35am

Apologies from all the sensible people in Georgia. We think Carter was brought to Georgia by alien life forms, as a form of punishment for the world. He is the biggest moron we've ever had here, and brother, we've had our share.


McKinney! Cater/McKinney '08 !!!

( i think i just threw up. )


Again, the reasonable People of The Great State of Georgia ask for your forgiveness for the likes of Jihad Cartera'mamid. And to think he was a farmer...geeesh, not like any farmer I've ever known.

Did i mention the world was going nuts?

522 locutus  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 6:54:01am

Mr. Carter,

Stick to building houses.

523 Maynard  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:35:08am

And to think: he said this on a broadcast aired on the 223rd anniversary of Cornwallis' surrender to Washington at Yorktown.

524 Studsup  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:37:22am

Funny isn't it how Carter says we could have patiently and peacefully waited for independence like Canada, Australia and India but neglects to mention Ireland?

Hey, Jimmuh, what exactly did the Republic of Ireland have to do to get its freedom from England and when did that exactly happen? Tell us please Mr. Historian. Why would we not have shared that same fate, especially given the huge influx of Irish immigration to this here?

I think that Jimmy Carter has gone quite insane.

525 Veeshir  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 7:51:08am

Adams Lied, People Died
Blood for tea
Ye Olde Halliburtone!!!

526 MichelefromLA  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 8:12:57am

You know those "We're so sorry for invading Iraq" posters by those moonbats that were posted a few days ago...

What we should have done during the Carter administration is send those messages to the people of Iran -

"We're so sorry our citizens elected Jimmy Carter as President. Will you ever forgive us?" Seriously!

527 Gordon  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 8:14:35am

You are misrepresenting Carter's viewpoint on this issue, Charles. Which doesn't excuse Carter's other inanities - but on this one he's making a point that Barbara Tuchman made in her "March of Folly" and "First Salute" books, that English ineptitude and pig-headedness led to the successful American revolution. If the British parliament hadn't pressed on with its punitive tax proposals and methods to discipline the colonies, we would be just like a big Canada or Australia now.

I'm not sure what point Carter is trying to make with this though. It's not really applicable to the Iraq war - President Bush, for all his faults, isn't exactly acting like that other George 230 years ago.

528 BarCodeKing  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 8:34:21am

Let's laugh at the idiocy of this man. First of all, the Revolutionary War was NOT the bloodiest war in our history. Not. Even. Close. Try the Civil War, Mr. Peanut (or The War Between The States or The War of Northern Aggression, if you'd prefer). The casualties in that war made the Revolutionary War look like a Girl Scout picnic. Carter's ignorance of history is breathtaking.

Secondly, what reason is there to think that Canada and India and Australia would have become free, independent nations today without the example of the Americans being able to rule themselves rather than taking orders from London? Carter assumes that without the enlightened example of the United States as a beacon of freedom for mankind, other nations would still have gained their independence.

There's a reason this man was a one-term president. He wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer back in 1976, but he wasn't Gerald "The Accidental President" Ford, and with the Watergate scandal still fresh in everyone's mind, there was no chance of any presidential candidate with an (R) after his name winning. A competent Democrat could easily have set the stage for several consecutive Democrat administrations, given the disarray among the Republicans. Carter was most emphatically not a competent Democrat, proving to be a failure both in domestic and foreign policy, and we've had Republicans in the White House for 16 of the past 24 years as a result. Thank God and Reagan for that.

And let's also be thankful that Mr. Peanut is still out on the stump dispensing Democrat idiocy. If George W. Bush is Reagan's political heir, then John Kerry is Carter's. Remember that come Election Day.

529 BushBacker  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 11:40:38am

This from a one-termer (thank the almighty) president who, for starters, gave us double-digit inflation; passively allowed American hostages to sit in Iran for 444 days; and gave away the Panama Canal.

He would have done Americans the biggest favor if he'd drank himself into oblivion on kegs of Billy Beer!

He's quite happy, I'm sure, with Kerry's "global test" philosophy and no doubt would have installed Jacques Chirac's phone number in his presidential speed dial for daily consensus reports with the spineless coward!

530 Sentinel Talos  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:03:54pm

First off, the revolutionary war was not our bloodiest war. That distinction belongs to the Civil War, no recount needed. More Americans died fighting in that than all of the wars we fought combined.
Secondly, of course we could have become independant if the Brits had been willing to let us. But they weren't, hence the battle of Lexington and Concord.
Thirdly, if I'm understanding Jimbo's comments correctly, he's saying that we're the redcoats and the Iraqi terrorists are the minutemen. Excuse me, what is that? Last time I checked George Washington didn't have innocent civilians kidnapped and gruesomely murdered. Also the idea that had we been more 'sensitive' and not 'rushed' to war the whole Iraq problem would have disappeared, is at the very best ludicrous.
As a final note, if gaining independence via the peaceful route would make us like Canada, a culturally split country unable to defend itself with a failed health system to boot, then I'd have to say the Revolutionary War was necessary.

531 Stonewall  Wed, Oct 20, 2004 12:53:24pm

#513 Jakester

I see we have much diff views on the causes of that war. I will not attempt to change your mind but I will assure you that the "slavery was the sole cause" idea is simplification to the extreme. The taxation issues were going on decades before it got to the point of secession. Slavery was an issue but it was by far not the only issue. The first rumblings of secession began about 1830 over the taxation of the agrarian south. Those rumblings increased to a fever pitch when slavery became at issue.

532 Composmentis  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 5:41:22am

Battle of Fort Sumter April 12/13, 1861

Emancipation Proclamation Jan. 1, 1863

Tivo?

533 ivanyiag  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 2:49:35pm

If Washington had chosen the Canadian way, the North American continent would be
1. the North-West would be Russian (Alaska, Washington, Oregon etc, also British Columbia in Canada)
2. the South-west would be Mexican (California, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, New Mexico
3. the south would be French (Louisiana tenessee, Georgia etc)
4. maybe Florida would be British after a British-Spanish war

Colonial America would be the rest of the continent, including central and Eastern Canada, with the capital in Quebec, the official language might be Frenglish or Engrench

534 zulubaby  Thu, Oct 21, 2004 4:13:03pm
You are misrepresenting Carter's viewpoint on this issue, Charles.

--

I'm not sure what point Carter is trying to make with this though.

Poor Gordon.

535 travis  Sat, Oct 23, 2004 3:45:22am

official independence dates:

US of A: 1776

canada: 1982
india: 1947
australia: 1986

their patience finally paid off! more at http://www.all-encompassingly.com/archives/000479. php


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Arranging for impudent party.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

To me, cigarettes are food -- Response to an assertion that his nicotine habit conflicted with his anti-drug stance

Sharper Image