LGF

-RetweetEason Jordan Releases a Statement

Thu, Feb 3, 2005 at 8:26:14 am PST

Carol Platt Liebau has published a response from Eason Jordan.

To be clear, I do not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists in Iraq. I said so during the forum panel discussion. But, nonetheless, the U.S. military has killed several journalists in Iraq in cases of mistaken identity. The reason the word “targeted” came up at all is because I was responding to a comment by Congressman Franks, who said he believed the 63 journalists killed in Iraq were the victims of “collateral damage.” Since three of my CNN colleagues and many other journalists have been killed on purpose in Iraq, I disputed the “collateral damage” statement, saying, unfortunately, many journalists — not all — killed in Iraq were indeed targeted. When someone aims a gun at someone and pulls the trigger and then learns later the person fired at was actually a journalist, an apology is ppropriate and is accepted, and I believe those apologies to be genuine. But such a killing is a tragic case of mistaken identity, not a case of “collateral damage.” That is the distinction I was trying to make even if I did not make it clearly at the time. Further, I have worked closely with the U.S. military for months in an effort to achieve a mutual goal: keeping journalists in Iraq safe and alive.

Given what we know about the incident, and Jordan’s other statements on the record, this explanation is surprisingly lame. Captain Ed shows why.

Good luck finding any mention of this story in mainstream news. It’s being deliberately ignored.

Advertisement

535 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:28:55am

There comes a time when it's best just to shut your damn piehole. Jordan, that time is now.

2 noshariaincanada  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:29:09am

He's learned the taqqiya / kitman gig.

3 William  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:29:13am

"I do not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists in Iraq"

"Since three of my CNN colleagues and many other journalists have been killed on purpose in Iraq"

Does Jordan suffer from Schizophrenia?
 

4 GordonMcStraun  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:29:19am

IOW, US soldiers are really quite good shots, and not the spray-and-pray maniacs that I and my colleagues have been claiming for the past 2 years.

5 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:30:08am

it's being ignored because the Media know another cock up when they see one and would rather Jordan go away. The beating they've had this week so far has probably made the Media more thana bit gunshy

6 Axiom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:30:16am
I disputed the “collateral damage” statement, saying, unfortunately, many journalists — not all — killed in Iraq were indeed targeted.


Evidence please. This is the first time I have heard anyone say that journalists were "indeed targeted" to be killed by anyone.

7 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:30:39am
Good luck finding any mention of this story in mainstream news. It’s being deliberately ignored.

Proof please, Charles? Particular the word "deliberately."

8 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:30:50am

Oh I get it, we peons are too stupid to grasp your "Nuance" Eason?

"Targeted" in military parlance means that the mission profile and oporders are geared to the target. Considering you are "allegedly" a senior newsie perhaps you may have oh I don't know picked up ANY military theory? Words mean things-if the US forces were "targeting" journalists you could stack you simpering fools like cordwood.


Maybe if the newsies were not in such an incestuous relationship with terrorists and insurgents they would not be in the vincinity of inbound ordnance?

9 jscorse  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:31:00am

Jordon seems to lay out some points that are worth investigating- I hope people at this site take seriously the issue of journalists being killed in Iraq even if you don't like the messenger.

J.S.

[Link: voicesofreason.info...]

10 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:31:07am
11 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:31:31am

Fucking weasel.

Resign already.

12 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:32:12am

#7 Gordon

Oh goodie. Stupid is here. Perhaps you could explain how a story could be inadvertently ignored?

13 Capt. Queeg  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:32:38am

That gave me a migraine about halfway through...

14 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:32:53am

Can you say 'backpedal'?

Once upon a time these little 'slipups' never saw the light of day. Another case of MSM hypocrisy.

15 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:33:03am
16 sixstringslinger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:33:03am

Knew it! What a freaking weasel! This guy has GOT TO GO!

17 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:33:26am

#7 Nodrog,

Well considering that the blogs are all over this and Jordan acknowledges that *gee maybe I stepped in it" and there are ZERO stories in the MSM maybe that is *proof*?

You move the goalposts a lot...


How'd you like President Dean's SOTU last evening?

18 Axiom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:34:21am

By the way; the closest event I can recall that was remotely near the definition of "targeting" journalists was the Reuters cameraman that was shot by US troops because they mistook his camera for a shoulder fired missile.

Methinks Eason Jordan has been consulting with Seymor "The Government is being run by an 8 person cult" Hersh.

"One of the ways -- one of the things that you could say is, the amazing thing is we are been taken over basically by a cult, eight or nine neo-conservatives have somehow grabbed the government." - Seymour Hersh speaking at the Steven Wise Reform Synagogue
19 Eric MN  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:35:02am

Captain Ed has been a Eason Jordan blogging machine since Hugh Hewitt asked bloggers to look into his statements.

20 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:35:10am
21 NoHoKev  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:35:32am

It doesn't matter what Mr. Jordan says after the fact. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. The damage to our American military and their integrity was already done. The words of Eason, spoken in Davos, have already resonated thru-out the "we hate America" world-wide media as a validation of their beliefs.

22 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:35:35am

Jordan is playing with semantics now. The excuse doesn't fly.

CNN is just al-Jazeera in English.

23 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:36:20am

Somebody put this little Eichmann, braying into his microphone, out of our collective misery. CNN won't distance itself from him. Therefore, CNN is the Gestapo.

24 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:36:25am
25 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:36:33am

TEST

26 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:36:41am

#12 Thom: Did the MSM "deliberately" ignore the story of your mental breakdown?

There are a lot of stories the MSM ignores. I'm honing in on the word "deliberate." I'm telling Charles to prove it. He didn't even say "I suspect this is deliberate." He said it was deliberate as fact. I'm asking him to prove his fact.

Have you figured it out yet, Thom?

27 trendsurfer  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:37:21am

And yet ...

... according to reports I [Eason Jordan] believe to be true journalists have been arrested and tortured by US forces

As long as he can fan the flames of anti-Americanism and perpetuate the myth of the United States' inherent evil , his job is done.

28 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:37:34am

I imagine Eason Jordan is in his office with his fingers in his ears shouting,"LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you! LA LA LA LA LA!"

29 Colt  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:37:41am

#7 Gordon

Proof please, Charles?

You want Charles to prove that a story is not being reported? LOL!

30 rcris5  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:37:44am

Targeted, collateral, oops. Twelve? Whatever. Considering how these scums have been attempting to smear and destroy the good reputation of our military and obstruct the mission...I'd say twelve is just a good start. Let these sanctimonious bastards reap what they sow.

31 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:37:51am

#19 Eric MN

Part of the Captain's rebuttal:

While I appreciate your response, I find it singularly inadequate. Just in terms of the one incident in Davos, your characterization of the debate fails to match with the two independent sources we have already seen. The first source, Forumblog, tells us that your forum was videotaped. Where is the transcript? Why don't you simply produce that, or a videotape on CNN, with the portion of your statement? Surely CNN has the resources to track the tape down. The fact that your own news service fails to make that information available causes me to discount your characterization.

The good Captain is right on target with his response to Jordon's BS statement.

32 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:38:12am

Bizarre gas poisoning "accident" kills Georgia PM

I wonder if this is one of those accidents like a bowl full of dioxin getting dumped someone's soup while he is meeting with the head of the secret police.

33 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:38:46am

#26 Nodrog,

Hey Nodrog you and Kos ran the Moonbat 15 back in November...

how'd that race end up again?


Trying to play damage control while being silent on the tube means at least Clinton News Network is "deliberate".

34 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:39:19am

#29 Colt: My point exactly. Charles can't prove it. And when Charles can't prove something, he should state it as if it were a fact.

35 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:39:26am

#8 sven10077:

I agree. Notice the slipping of the Big Lie into the apology, rendering it completely specious. As you say, "targeting" has a specific meaning, which completely negates the rest of the apology. Either journalists are being killed by the US Military in a planned and purposeful way--i.e. "being targeted", or they're simply victims of collateral damage and honest mistakes. You can't have it both ways.

On a football field, the guys facing you are the enemy. If a spectator wanders onto the field, he's got no right to whine about getting sacked.

36 SoCalJustice  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:39:34am

(#7) Gordon

Proof please, Charles? Particular the word "deliberately."

When the chief of a major news network (or newspaper) is involved in some kind of controversy, it's a pretty safe bet that editors at other major news outlets are aware of it.

The only thing that executive producers and news execs follow more than their own audience is their competition.

There's nothing in the Washington Post on this - which is a little unsurprising because their main media reporter, Howard Kurtz, also has a show on CNN called "Reliable Sources." If a higher up at ABC or CBS made the same remark as Jordan, I bet he would have written about it though - this kind of thing is right up his alley. He was pretty fair on Dan Rather and memogate, as major newspaper reporters went.

So this is a special case for him, because he works for Jordan and has a conflict. Still, another WaPo media writer could have picked up the story...

The last NY Times story involving Eason Jordan is from September 2003.

The two most important papers in the U.S. are ignoring the story - and it would be shocking if they were unaware of it.

37 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:40:00am

RAWK! Deliberate! RAWK!

38 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:40:05am

#26 Gordon

They are aware of the story, but they are not reporting it. Have you figured that out yet?

39 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:40:39am
40 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:40:55am

Oh, Gordon is back from the hajj. Wonder who Gordon had in mind when he stoned the devil with those little pebbles in Saudi Arabia.

41 RebTex  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:40:56am

Jordan is doin' his best impression of a crawfish.
Words, like a bullet, are not retreivable once they're fired off!

42 scoreboard44  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:41:01am

Thus...He now walks around with a target on his back.

How stupid to accuse something like this in the first place.

Some people just don't know when to stay in their burrow.

43 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:41:11am

#34 Gordon

Are you actually claiming that they are unaware of this story? Can you really be that dumb?

44 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:41:26am

nodroG is cornering Charles...oh...oh...no he doesn't corner him! False alarm. Relax. Wasn't even close. Had more to do with nodroG lack of logic.

45 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:41:46am

#33 Sven: CNN is a small and diminishing portion of the MSM.

Charles didn't say CNN was deliberately ignoring the story, he was saying the entire MSM was deliberately ignoring the story.

Back in the early 20th century some would have called this techniqute "The Big Lie."

46 Earl  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:42:09am

OT

Another MSM tour de force, from the Toronto Red Star:

Zerby's baaack!

Lousy syntax? Check.
Incoherent argument? Check.
Spouts LLL mantras? Check.
Reflexively anti-American? Check.

Must be another Pulitzer-calibre piece by Canada's own Antonia ("Hey, can I have that last piece of baclava?") Zerbesias.

47 Sloan  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:43:19am

Don't get me wrong, I'm just as suspicious of Eason Jordan as everyone else...I think he probably did intend to malign our military. But it sure would be nice to have a transcript, or a video clip, or something with which to confirm Jordan's actual remarks. It doesn't sound, though, like this part of the Davos conference was being recorded in any way.

48 Capt. Queeg  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:44:00am

#26 Gordon

Please prove to us that the story is not being ignored. You don't like the word "deliberate"? Fine. Accuse Charles of redundancy, then.

ig·nore ( P ) Pronunciation Key (g-nôr, -nr)
tr.v. ig·nored, ig·nor·ing, ig·nores
To refuse to pay attention to; disregard.

Youn can't refuse to pay attention to something that you don't know exists.

Let's all chip in and get this guy a dictionary. It seems to be his downfall more often that not. Typical LLL: doesn't believe words have any meaning...

49 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:44:18am
50 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:45:13am

#45 Gordon

Look. You can't prove that something does not exist. So, all you have to do to refute Charles is find a story in the MSM about this uproar.

Until you do that, maybe you could stop squawking and derailing the thread with your idiocy.

51 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:45:18am

#35 JWPaine,

Thanks.

It just galls me, that any newsie has the gall to pretend the US military is "targeting them". If US forces were unleahsed on the press there would be the highest turnover ever seen in their ranks. There are times I wish we would help the embedded reporters with the terrs "calm down a bit" with directed fire, but at the end of the day we must suffer their idiocy so as to maintain our way of life...

Eason will have to forgive me if I save my tears for the people who are there executing our policy on behalf of the American people, and not bottomfeeders leveraging for marketshare.

52 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:45:37am

It is true that a U.S. Representative slapped Eason Jordan down on this one. I still am amazed it was Rep. Barney Frank (D, MA)!

53 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:45:58am

#40 Firebreather

Oh, Gordon is back from the hajj

LOL!

That explains the smell.

54 Powderfinger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:46:14am
55 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:46:18am

There's a huge difference between "deliberately targeted" and "mistakenly targeted." That Jordan would use the former and pretend it is the same as the latter (and only after being caught) fits in with how low a regard they have for the public.

56 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:46:22am

The MSM not interested in this? How can it be?

57 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:47:47am

/thermal sight: ON/

nodroG: GAZE

(Lizardoid Minions: Note the green vapor spewing from it's mouth. On the planet MoonBat, that is known as 'speech'. However, on THIS planet, it is known as trollspeak, or more commonly, bullshit.)

58 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:48:59am

#54 Powderfinger

D'oh. I had no idea that Charles asked us to ignore the idiot.

Guess what, Gordon?

59 Victor of the Apes  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:49:23am

Eason doesn't understand what collateral damage means, apparently.

60 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:49:28am

#33 nodrog

I just did a search on CNN.com for "eason jordan statement". Four hits, but nothing recent. Searching "eason jordan", 26 hits, nothing newer than 04/11/2003.

61 RebTex  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:49:44am

It appeared to me that the use of the word "deliberate" was an acknowledgement of the usual MSM tendency to NOT report on subject matter that displays them in a bad light.
Like a code of "honor" among theives, the MSM tend not to report on items that BLATANTLY show their bias.

62 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:50:01am

Bush allowed these reporters to be "embedded" (like lice in a dog's matted hair) with our troops.

All troops were trained and debriefed about how to handle these sacred cow journalists-- to risk their lives to protect the embedded lice and to treat them with kiddy gloves at all times.

The military would never invite a scandal by deliberately shooting the embedded lice.

But the embedded lice keeps trying to destroy the animal it inhabits, eating at the flesh of the military, sucking its blood to sustain itself.

Memo to Bush administration: This is the thanks you get from the media for your openness and naivete.

Never Again.

63 stormkitten  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:51:33am

#5 Jewels (aka Julian)

it's being ignored because the Media know another cock up when they see one and would rather Jordan go away. The beating they've had this week so far has probably made the Media more thana bit gunshy

Do they really? G.I. Joe doesn't think so. ;)

64 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:51:58am

#47 Sloan:

It doesn't sound, though, like this part of the Davos conference was being recorded in any way.

Not buying it. A boatload of newsmakers gather at a conference to say newsworthy stuff with a boatload of journalists looking for things to report... and no one was taking notes or recording anything?

Nope, just more liberal CYA. Seen it too many times.

65 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:53:14am

#61 RebTex

It appeared to me that the use of the word "deliberate" was an acknowledgement of the usual MSM tendency to NOT report on subject matter that displays them in a bad light.

Well said...

66 scoreboard44  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:53:55am

#55 Model 4

Kinda a like " I mistakenly stuck my foot in my mouth" instead of "I deliberately stuck my foot in my mouth".

One of those thingy's.

One is an example of just bad manners.

The other is an example of being from the deep south...as in...
"Peter and Tweeter were out back, chewing on each other's feet."

My dog smells well. my dog also smells good.

67 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:53:59am

On further consideration, I have to say that Jordan shows enormous contempt for the general public with his use of the word "targeted." The man's a journalist, someone who allegedly knows what words mean and how to use them. To slip that into an "apology" shows the greatest of duplicity.

OT: has anyone in the MSM called Jf'nK on his delivering "guns to the Khmer Rouge" comment last Sunday?

68 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:55:39am

#64 Model4,

Think Wannsee Conference...

there may be "notes" but none of the participants particularly wants them read in all likelihood.

69 RebTex  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:55:39am

ScoreBoard
Peter & Tweeter?!

70 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:55:53am

OT OT OT

From Debka:

Sudden upsurge of Palestinian terrorist incidents Thursday afternoon shortly after Abbas announced Palestinians had accepted ceasefire.

Fifteen-year old Palestinian boy with concealed bomb-belt apprehended at Hawara checkpoint outside Nablus on West Bank. He was heading for suicide attack. In Gaza Strip, 40 kilo bomb discovered and dismantled near Sufa crossing.

71 Mary  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:55:57am

#9 jscorce
Anyone can allege, can accuse. You have to provide something, some bit of evidence to back an accusation. Mr. Eason has not. On the contrary, he is back pedaling and playing the semantics game.

72 Axiom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:56:26am

Does anyone recall Eason Jordan lifting a finger when the press offices of Palestinian newspapers are ransacked and razed by crazed terrorists operating in the W.B. and G.S. because the newsspapers were critical of Yassir Arafat and the terrorist organizations?

The terrorists destroyed cars with the reporters in them. They burned down offices. They beat editors. They kidnapped journalists. They beat women. This was all in 2004.

73 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:57:11am

Most journalists romanticize the terrorists and have a similar desire to achieve "martyrdom" (only without dying as the terrorists do).

Out in the combat zone, a kind of transference takes place, whereby journalists seek to "live out" the martyrdom of their romanticized, underdog heroes ("heroes" is exactly how they see themselves).

Because the military is targeting journalists, many reporters feel they too are being targeted. Basic transference.

74 scoreboard44  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:58:26am

Last names Van Meter...it's an inside family joke.

75 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:58:49am
Because the military is targeting journalists, many reporters feel they too are being targeted. Basic transference.

Uh, Firebreather, you sure that's what you meant to write?

76 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:59:37am

No doubt, Daniel Pearl was beheaded by vicious marines.

77 Loyd Dobbler  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 6:59:59am

Perhaps if they didn't stand 3 feet away from the terrorists while taking pictures of them firing rockets at American soldiers there would be less journalists killed. Then again, what do I know.

78 SwampWoman  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:01:05am

#32 Ed

Bizarre gas poisoning "accident" kills Georgia PM

I wonder if this is one of those accidents like a bowl full of dioxin getting dumped someone's soup while he is meeting with the head of the secret police.

Yep, when I read it last night, I wondered if the KGB was present...

Them Rooskies sho' be accident prone. If I were a suspicious person, I'd believe somebody be helpin' 'em on their way to the great beyond.

79 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:01:18am

#34 Gordon
#29 Colt: My point exactly. Charles can't prove it. And when Charles can't prove something, he should state it as if it were a fact.


Dear Gordon:

Why don't you prove that the story is being reported by the MSM?

Here's a Google News Search Result For "Eason Jordan".

How many MSM news reports do you see on this story, moron?

I don't even see anything from Fox!

80 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:01:58am

63 journalists killed in Iraq were the victims of “collateral damage.”Does this Eason Jordan dude provide references to each journalist and case reports on their deaths?

81 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:02:18am

Sorry, I screwed up my post #73... (Military targeting journalists, therefore reporters feel they're being targeted).

"Targeting journalists" should've read "targeting terrorists."

I know you'll all understand the Freudian slip, especially when it's increasingly difficult to distinguish between the two.

82 SoCalJustice  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:03:07am

If you type Eason Jordan's name into Google News, you get entries from:

1) Hugh Hewitt
2) NRO
3) FrontPageMag
4) Powerline
5) Weekly Standard
6) Powerline (again)

Nothing from a purported mainstream or non-ideologically slanted outlet.

Still waiting for LGF to be added to Google News. Stinky Beaumont's gotta step up his lobbying efforts.

83 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:03:52am
I know you'll all understand the Freudian slip, especially when it's increasingly difficult to distinguish between the two.


LOL Firebreather!

84 RebTex  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:04:02am

Hey!
Did ya'll hear?
Kinky Friedman is runnin' for Governor of Texas!

85 gwlaw99  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:04:30am

Assuming that the journalists were not actually working with the terrorists.Wouldn't the best descrption of this be "friendly fire" incidents.

86 Occasional Reader  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:06:19am

So let me get this straight: if my neighborhood has been plagued by violent break-ins; and early one morning in the pre-dawn hours, I hear a prowler in my yard, get a gun, and shoot the prowler; but if it turns out to actually be the milkman;

Then, according to Eason Jordan, I'm "targeting milkmen"?

87 scoreboard44  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:06:23am

off to Rush. gotta go.

88 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:06:58am

#85 gwlaw99, yea, but that is a big assumption!

89 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:07:00am

#68 sven10077: Remember when Kerry was crashing and burning on the snow slopes and abusing a member of the Secret Service, in the presence of a pack of reporters? Yet... no pictures or footage of that made it to air or into print that I recall. Or Kerry said that he had the support of "foreign leaders" for his candidacy, but when this upset people the reporter said "Uh, wait, I guess I mistranscribed the tape. He said, err, 'more leaders.' Please pretend that makes sense and doesn't raise the same concerns." Or Terezzza says "unamerican" in a speech, yells at a reporter minutes later saying "I never said 'unamerican!'", yet the MSM chooses not to point out her obvious lie, even when footage exists. It goes on and on.

Needless to say, GOP/ conservative figures do not get the same respect/ whitewash.

90 Bostonian  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:07:26am

#79, actually at least some of the news companies keep themselves out of Google (I don't know how). So to search the MSM properly, you have to go to their own search engines.

I just searched "Eason Jordan Davos" at the NYT site. Nothing recent.

Eason Jordan Davos

But that's the way you have to see what they've really got.

91 gymnast  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:08:15am

Now that my Man, the Reverand Al, has sucessfully pulled off his PETA scam, enduring him to the millions of his supporters on Oregon college campus's, He figures it's time to add some new talent to His campaign staff and this Eason Jordan is just the kind of public opinion shaper that the Rev' can use. Al senses that the impending unemployment of this CNN dude provides an opportunity to add a world class prevaricator to his staff on the cheap.

Al says that "Eason Jordon epitomizes many of the values that a Democrat politition must hold dear in the struggle to assume power in this great nation" and with his connections to the Middle East, " Jordon can be a great help to the Sharpton steamroller by bringing the Islamist vote to his mainly Christian Campaign".

The Rev hopes that Jordon can quickly get to work on adjusting the perceptions that resulted from Als ecumenical references to some goverment statistics the Rev commented on yesterday.

92 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:08:38am

If the Nodrog ever had a major league fastball (for a pinko liberal), it's sure lost its edge.

It's like a 39 year old pitcher with a 78 MPH heater, trying to survive the final spring training cut by throwing a bunch of junk up to the plate. Nodrog's batting practice "fastballs" are getting whacked all over the park.

Go back to KOS, Nodrog, otherwise known as the minor leagues, where you can have amateur hour with other washed-up has-beens and never-weres.

93 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:10:25am

Anybody got access to Lexis-Nexus? I don't know how frequently it's updated, but it has pretty much everything in print (at least, it did back when I was in grad school...)

94 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:11:05am

#89 Model4,


much as I respect the blogs as a place to engage MSM bias in judo, and not to undersell the influence that the boggers exerted against Rather I suspect that the press will be HAPPY to ignore the blogs until we get radio to start jawing about it.

The blogs need to act as a fact checking and early warning system for radio so that radio can influence the non-net savvy who don't see blogs...


The MSM/LLL relationship has gone from "love affair" to incestuous...

95 Mentat  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:11:18am

Wow. Captain Ed just lambastes him.

I always knew from my own experience that leftists tended to dominate university and college campuses and that the people to whom they were teaching their values and views had to end up somewhere. So, obviously they end up in the media, entertainment industries and government bureaucracy (which explains the State Department). It is interesting though that economics departments and business schools tend to remain completely untainted by this crap for surely what are good practical reasons. Even the Prime Minister of Turkey noted the other day, in response to Islamist overtures, that "There is no such thing as Islamic Economics."

It is what used to be called the Humanities (i.e history, literature, political studies, theology, philosophy, etc.) that has been most contaminated by the leftist contagion. It is only in the humanities that one can spout the most ridiculous nonsense and be acclaimed as a genius. Just this morning I read an article lamenting the absence of "black thought" from school curriculums. What the heck is "black thought"? Does this presuppose the existence of "caucasian thought" or "native american thought"? Does this mean that there should be "black" science similar to the Soviet Union's Lysenkoism?

Irrationalism is running rampant in the universities and colleges. As G.K. Chesterton said, "When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing. They believe in anything."

96 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:11:29am

Say Bostonian, your nick implies you need to employ zombie's modus operandi:-) living a faux moonbat life!

97 SwampWoman  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:11:41am

#84 RebTex

Hey!
Did ya'll hear?
Kinky Friedman is runnin' for Governor of Texas!

Dang, I'd sure like to hear "They ain't makin' Jews Like Jesus Anymore" as a campaign theme song.

That's one candidate I could get behind.

98 Bostonian  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:12:45am

#96
I just stay quiet and smile a lot.

Also, I try to stay out of Cambridge.

99 Occasional Reader  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:14:53am

And now that I've mastered Eason Jordan logic (#86), let me see if I can take a crack at Gordon Logic:

So the MSM are inadvertently ignoring an incredibly inflammatory statement, made by the head of the world's largest news organization, at the highest-profile event on the planet?

100 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:16:12am

This "Gordon" person is one strange dude.

Why does anyone entertain him? He's obviously mentally ill.

101 RIP Ford  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:17:10am
Kinky Friedman is runnin' for Governor of Texas!

I'll be voting for him.

102 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:17:58am

OT, but holy shit:

Friday Prayers at the United Nations

UNITED NATIONS, 31 January 2005 — Every Friday at a penthouse hall above the Dag Hammarskjold Library at UN headquarters in New York, one can hear the Adhan, recitation from the Holy Qur’an, and Khutba.

Muslim UN staff members and delegates can be seen arriving at the penthouse hall to offer Friday prayers. The arrangements have been made specifically for Muslims affiliated with the United Nations, who wish to offer Friday prayers.

Did anybody know this before?

103 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:18:05am

#95 Mentat

...It is interesting though that economics departments and business schools tend to remain completely untainted by this crap...

I wish that were true, however, even B-schools are drifting leftward. I recently had to (sadly) tell an old friend (who is an Marketing prof) to FOAD because he turned into a LLL troll.

104 narley  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:20:02am
I have worked closely with the U.S. military for months in an effort to achieve a mutual goal: keeping journalists in Iraq safe and alive.

(sarcasm on)

Since, of course, it is the responsibility of the U.S. military to ensure the safety of "journalists" in a combat zone as if said "journalists" were merely on holiday at Wally-World. Further, this responsibility certainly extends to the circumstance where said "journalist" is taking a photograph (from no more than ten feet away, and with the knowledge and permission of his subject) of the enemy firing on U.S. troops from a concealed position.

(sarcasm off)

NOT!

We must also not miss the subtext of Mr. Jordan's comment. Does he demonstrate any interest in keeping the flesh and blood of the U.S. military safe? No! Not unless we are to follow the CNN agenda of quitting and allow the traditional "culture" (a.k.a. tribal warfare, tyranny, slavery...) of the region to blossom into its own natural perfection (read "Hell").

105 YogSothoth  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:20:12am

#79 (Craig)

You can whittle down the list a bit by quoting Eason Jordon (so that only stories where the 2 words appear together are displayed) via

link

You are quite correct that none of the MSM outlets appear. Having said that, why doesn't foxnews at least show up? Surely, liberal media bias can't be the reason (foxnews hardly fits that label) and they did put the wood to that Ward Churchill idiot in pretty thorough fashion.

My guess is that some MSM outlets are looking at this but realize that with Jordan's current weasel words making the rounds only a transcript, tape or video could elevate this story beyond "he said, she said". In short, I'd say that without that transcript it's a bit premature to claim the MSM is deliberately avoiding the story. Gordon is right on this one.

106 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:20:32am

#94 sven10077:

much as I respect the blogs as a place to engage MSM bias in judo, and not to undersell the influence that the boggers exerted against Rather I suspect that the press will be HAPPY to ignore the blogs until we get radio to start jawing about it.

We'll see. The recent signs have me quite optimistic. CNN and MSNBC have been featuring left-wing bloggers like Wonkette, Kos and Sully. Fox News has had on bloggers and mentioned others.

The other day Rush was mentioning blogs and their impact positively, which means he now understanding where they fit in. At first he only saw them as a person new to them would see the "average" blog. Some young person posting all by themself about their day at class, what bands they like, etc. Of course some waxed indignant ("that means he's seen LGF and snubbed it!"), but it wasn't the case. So when the Big Dawg is making positive mentions to his audience of working folks across the spectrum of the American populace, that's very encouraging.

Blogging has come very far into the public spotlight in a relatively short span of time, especially when its technology seems like a backwards step on the surface. "A page with text with news and commentary you say? Whoop de doo!" I think it will progress very nicely.

107 loppyd  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:20:38am

If anyone has access to Lexus-Nexus that would be the place to go. I'm home sick (no, really!) or I'd be all over it at the office.

Bostonion - Cambridge is precisely where my W'04 sticker AND my Support the Troops magnet were ripped off and stolen, respectively. Shocking, I know.

108 Cato the Elder  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:21:12am

Eason Jordon releases a...

Damn! I can smell it from here!

109 loppyd  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:21:32am

Bostonian - oops my bad - didn't mean to call you an "onion"

110 Bilgeman  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:22:28am

"When someone aims a gun at someone and pulls the trigger and then learns later the person fired at was actually a journalist, an apology is ppropriate and is accepted, and I believe those apologies to be genuine"-Jordan

Which journalists in Iraq have been killed by aimed gunfire?

Names please?

Waiting;

111 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:22:48am

I turned on Rush, hoping to hear about Eason Jordan, but so far not a word.

112 Shammer  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:23:35am

#100 JammieWearingFool

This These "Gordon" person kids is are one some strange dude dudes.

Why does anyone entertain him them? He's They are obviously mentally ill.

:-)

113 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:24:02am

#105 YogSothoth

Glad you made it up from R'lyeh!

114 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:24:06am

#100 JammieWearingFool

Why does anyone entertain him? He's obviously mentally ill.

Good question. But I don't think we're entertaining it so much as it's entertaining us - after all, it IS fun to poke it with sharp sticks...
;^)

115 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:26:05am

#106 Model4,

Oh I agree that Blogs are a growing force.

Sorry if I did not make clear I was discussing THIS case in particular. Jordan is fortunate the majority of the rest of the samizdat media is busy with the SOTU...


OT)

Matthews is saying that the "hug was staged"...

Matthews: Hug was staged


The hilarious thing is he is such a rotund fu**ing hypocrit he is...

Beijing billy was MASTER of the staged event...

witness his antics at Omaha Beach on the D-day events

116 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:26:06am
117 Former CNN Watcher  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:27:38am

Eason Jordan is a lying incompetent.

Don't force him to resign. Let him keep beavering away incompetently at his job; let him drive more and more of CNN's audience away.

Eventually CNN will merge with Al Jazeera and the mask will completely fall away.

118 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:29:05am
119 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:29:25am

Eason Jordan, Serial Slanderer
From Hugh Hewitt

There is also the nugget uncovered by Peter Cook and publicized broadly by Ed Morrissey, that in late 2004, Jordan accused American troops of torturing journalists:

"'Actions speak louder than words. The reality is that at least 10 journalists have been killed by the US military, and according to reports I believe to be true journalists have been arrested and tortured by US forces,' Mr Jordan told an audience of news executives at the News Xchange conference in Portugal."

Eason Jordan is a serial slanderer of the American military, and he upped the charge from torture to murder this week. He's a senior exec at CNN, which is indifferent to his slanders. Perhaps because they play well where they are intended to? More Jordan, from a 2002 interview:

"The reality is that we are a US-based news channel, but that doesn't mean we're American in perspective with our international service. In fact the person who oversees all our international outlets is not an American at all, he's British, and we hired him from the BBC several years ago. There are more than fifty nationalities of journalists who work at CNN International producing that service. If we were to move CNN's base to Egypt maybe they'd say we're Egyptian—you have to be based somewhere. It's the people who produce the channel and the people who provide the reporting who are really responsible for it, and those are people from all over the world, the very best journalists and program makers we can find. No matter what CNN International does, as long as CNN's headquarters is in the United States people are going to say, well, it's an American service. But the reality is that it's an international service based in the United States, and we don't make any apologies about that."

In agreement that Jordan's feet should be put to the fire by his "Peers" to provide proof or apologize and resign.

But would "Ted" really care ?

120 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:29:30am

Hi, Rayra!

I'd pay good money to see you and Easton square off somewhere!

What are the odds we could arrange it on 60 Minutes? ;^)

121 MoonbatBane  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:30:16am

#15 song_and_dance_man 2/3/2005 08:33AM PST

Can we all 'deliberately' ignore Gordon.

Nah, I think I'll "indavertently" ignore Nodrog. LOL

122 thepoguemahone  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:30:54am

What an idiot - collateral damage refers to any unintended victims of military action intended to kill enemy soldiers

If your reporters are in a room and the military thinks they are not reporters, but might be enemy soldiers - and aim's deliberately at the room in an effort to kill those enemy - then they reporters are collateral damage

Unless Eason has some evidence the military intended to kill reporters - he should STFU

Or at least have the class to go out and forge some documents that "prove his case" - paging Mr Rather

123 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:32:52am

Not Gordon again.

You're so freaking lazy. Here, start reading, from bottom to top. It's amazing how Gordon always manages to come out on the wrong side of the issue, supporting the wrong people. How many years on LGF and he remains clueless? Must have a thick head.

124 Terp Mole  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:33:25am

In 1999, Eason alleged CNN journalists were targeted ("singled out") for violence by Serb forces.

KURTZ: Eason Jordan, one group of your CNN reporters in Belgrade had their hotel door knocked down as they were in the process of being expelled, had their car set on fire. This is pretty rough stuff going on. Do you have the impression that CNN, in particular, is being singled out by Serb security forces, and why might that be?

EASON JORDAN, CNN EXECUTIVE: Well, there's no question CNN is being singled out for this. For one reason, CNN has a long history in the Balkans and is not the most favorite network of the hard-line leadership in Yugoslavia.

Secondly, we're being watched in Yugoslavia, which is a -- at a time like this, frankly a disadvantage. We would rather not be seen in the war zone just because it brings out the hard-liners who really come down on us with a ton of bricks.

KURTZ: And yet at the same time, if I can follow up, that CNN reporters, along with most other Western journalists, were being expelled from the country, you were allowing certain Serb leaders -- the Yugoslav foreign minister, for example -- to come and make their case on your network. Why would you give them access if they're not giving your reporters access?

JORDAN: We're committed to balance. We owe it to our viewers to present a balanced picture, and if the Yugoslav leadership is going to make itself available to us, then we will allow them to share their views with our viewers around the world.

I should make one point, though. The Serb media has vitriolically lobbed bombs at CNN, saying that we cheered the start of the bombing, saying that we opened champagne bottles when the bombing began. And the Serb television has even said that CNN's leadership should be charged for war crimes.

JORDAN: Well, you know, there are also American commentators who are observing that this kind of war is good for our ratings.
[Source: The Press Goes to War (March 28, 1999) CNN RELIABLE SOURCES, Transcript # 99032700V50]


Nice! It's all good... "for out ratings."

Don't expect to find Eason blaiming Clinton's military for Serb targeting of CNN journalists.

125 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:33:56am

Uh oh ...

Muslim anger at Dutch imam plan

And we all know what happens when the RoPers get angry.

126 Mitchell82  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:33:57am

If jounralists wish to stay out of harms way and not get killed, stay home...they certainly arent the sharpest tools in the shed.

127 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:35:17am

#115 sven10077:

Matthews is saying that the "hug was staged"...

Hmm, wonder what a grieving mother who lost her war hero son could do to an ass like Mathews if she chose to reply to his accusation?

I think YogSothoth's got it right, there's just not enough goods to nail Jordan to the wall, so it would be unwise on many levels for a news organization to try to make an issue of it. Although once again, were he a conservative forgeries could be used to assign both words and deeds to him, and the media would have no problem with it.

The other day I heard a sad clip, think it was on Rush and think it was from CNN (sorry so fuzzy on this). It was during coverage of the Iraq election, and whomever was talking was praising the bravery of the reporters in Iraq, and no one else. Nope, not the Iraqi citizens, not coalition forces, but the reporters who are (relatively) coddled and protected, and largely stay hunkered down in safe zones waiting on their stringers' reports. Of course if you're of the mindset that US soldiers are deliberately targeting reporters, kind of explains how one could think this way.

128 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:35:46am
129 metapod  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:35:49am

Eason Jordan is a liar.

130 Smitty  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:36:24am

#71 Mary

#9 jscorce
Anyone can allege, can accuse. You have to provide something, some bit of evidence to back an accusation. Mr. Eason has not. On the contrary, he is back pedaling and playing the semantics game.

jscorce has a total of 5 comments - each linking to his own web-site. 'Nuff said.

131 Mentat  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:36:39am

#95 Mentat

Sorry folks, I misquoted Erdogan. He actually said:

My views on the Common Islamic Market was considered positive during my bilateral meetings in Saudi Arabia,” he said. “This issue has been raised in the past. The economy does not have any religion. One of the most important instruments of economy is money. Efforts to base money on ethnicity will lead to negative results. And the globalisation process in the world will, of course, reject these results.

[Link: www.ntvmsnbc.com...]

132 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:36:42am
Since three of my CNN colleagues and many other journalists have been killed on purpose in Iraq, I disputed the “collateral damage” statement, saying, unfortunately, many journalists — not all — killed in Iraq were indeed targeted. When someone aims a gun at someone and pulls the trigger and then learns later the person fired at was actually a journalist, an apology is ppropriate and is accepted, and I believe those apologies to be genuine. But such a killing is a tragic case of mistaken identity, not a case of “collateral damage.”

Wow. So journalists aren't being "deliberately targeted" they're just being "targeted". Intellectual heavyweight Eason Jordan is not. This guy makes George Soros look like Socrates.

133 Terp Mole  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:38:14am

Eason lied! Journalist died!

134 Submariner  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:38:25am

OT

Don't let your loved ones give you a "sherry enema"
Sorry, but too sad/funny not to share. And the phrase that comes to mind?
"With friends like her, who needs enemas?"

135 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:39:16am

#105 YogSothoth 2/3/2005 09:20AM PST

My guess is that some MSM outlets are looking at this but realize that with Jordan's current weasel words making the rounds only a transcript, tape or video could elevate this story beyond "he said, she said". In short, I'd say that without that transcript it's a bit premature to claim the MSM is deliberately avoiding the story. Gordon is right on this one.


Gordon is right about what? He demands that Charles provide proof that the MSM is deliberately ignoring this story. Here is his post:

#7 Gordon 2/3/2005 08:30AM PST

Good luck finding any mention of this story in mainstream news. It’s being deliberately ignored.

Proof please, Charles? Particular the word "deliberately."

YogSothoth, are you claiming that the MSM is inadvertently ignoring the story?

They're ignoring the story. Period.

Gordon is belching the usual leftist spin, then fleeing the debate - or trying to defend himself under a different username, which wouldn't surprise me in the least.

136 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:40:35am

900 Palestinian Prisoners to Gain Freedom

At the bottom of the article ...

The army said it arrested a 16-year-old Palestinian youth carrying explosives and a homemade gun and bullets at a checkpoint near Nablus, in the West Bank. Witnesses said the youth had been bragging to people at the checkpoint that he had an explosives belt.

900 released from jail and at least one on his way in. The Palestinians are insane, their own worst enemy.

137 SwampWoman  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:40:38am
When someone aims a gun at someone and pulls the trigger and then learns later the person fired at was actually a journalist, an apology is ppropriate and is accepted, and I believe those apologies to be genuine. But such a killing is a tragic case of mistaken identity, not a case of “collateral damage.” That is the distinction I was trying to make even if I did not make it clearly at the time.

Well, newsflash, you ain't all that clear yet. So lemme get this straight: I can aim a gun at somebody and pull the trigger but if it is a journalist all I have to say "dang, sorry 'bout that, I thought you wuz from the IRS" and everybody will pat me on the back and say "there, there, don't get all upset, we understand 'bout these mistaken identify things. Oh, better reload 'fore you go."

Somebody needs to go over these rules for killin' again. Apparently I am behind in my reading.

What was the difference between "mistaken identify" and "collateral damage" again? I don't really think I'd care all that much once I was dead. I always thought that "collateral damage" was what happened if the neighbor decided to shoot his ex-wife and her boyfriend while they was shoppin' and I got accidently killed in the Wal-Mart. I thought "mistaken identify" was if the drunked up fool thought I was his ex-wife and killed me.

138 loppyd  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:42:03am

#134 Submariner

I just scared the dog.

139 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:42:20am

#132 Dirk Diggler

Intellectual heavyweight Eason Jordan is not. This guy makes George Soros look like Socrates.

Further proof that great wealth and great intelligence do not go hand in hand. Soros may have been a whiz at currency trading, but is seems that pursuit must have damaged the rest of his brain. As for Jordon, he should remember the old adage

Tis better to be silent and thought a fool than speak and prove it.

140 SupplyGuy  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:42:55am

Being a military guy I can say that I don't see why it should be our responsibility to keep a bunch of journalists, bent on destroying our good name, safe in a combat zone.

If Eason is so worried about his safety tell him to stay home.

The fact is, he's scared of the military, not because they are out to get him, but because he and his ilk vilify the military on a daily basis, so he thinks they're out to get him because that would be what he would do if the tables were turned.

141 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:42:56am
142 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:43:08am

#123 zulubaby--

No sense in re-engaging Nodrog, your sworn and mortal enemy. It's more interested in sticking pins into its little zulubaby doll, or whatever it does.

Also, it's still recovering after the long flight back from Mecca.

143 SwampWoman  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:44:07am

Dang, I mistakenly identified the "f" as the "t" in my typin'. Time to get back to work 'stead of wastin' time procrastinatin'.

144 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:44:13am

#127 Model4

I think YogSothoth's got it right, there's just not enough goods to nail Jordan to the wall, so it would be unwise on many levels for a news organization to try to make an issue of it.

Baloney. There are respected people quoting the asshat. The asshat is denying he said what he said, and poorly at that. It is a story, and given the nature, size, and scope of the asshat's organization, it's a HUGE story. Or should be.

145 big L  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:45:28am

115-sven10077--Staged events? not only Omaha but Hil and Bil in Hawaii with the romance photos.

Plus for phony--the video of bill laffing it up at ron Brown's funeral until he saw the camera..then pretending to drop a tear and wipe his eye.

--Diane Sawyer asked mrs Norwood if she staged or rehearsed the hug...Geesh-with so many stories out there that are real.

Over and over the MSM try to tear down W. and over nad over the Msm look like fools. (Remember the day that the Rater gate memos were supposedly typed the office was closed due to Mother's day,a sunday.)

146 Jonny  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:45:29am
147 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:46:57am

Firebreather (#142)

Also, it's still recovering after the long flight back from Mecca.

LOL! Should we have a party, play loud music?

148 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:47:28am

#123 Zulubaby

RE: Gordon

You remember many years ago on the gradeschool playground, the little "t_rd" who nobody seemed to like, who would start some vile argument then run to a teacher or the principal for protection ...

that was Gordon.

In his child-like way, he likes to stir up useless Sh_t just to irritate you and waste a lot of peoples time, this time begging the question to prove a negative. He's hardly around later to answer for it ... ever notice ?

Charles keeps him for amusement, but don't waste your time on him, he's a 7 year old walkin' around in a 35 year old body.

149 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:48:00am

145 Big L...

well I am certain that the TANG secretary/CO were SO concerned over Lt. Bush that they felt the need to go in on a holiday to type it up...

/moonbat off


Yeah it is just funny wathcing them froth at the mouth about stuff that they do every time they get power...

150 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:50:47am

146 Jonny,

O...M...G...

But I don't know why that surprises me, Iran being The Islamic Nation, and Islam being the ROPMA.

151 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:50:54am

#146 Johnny

You need to pick up the pace a little pal.

You just getting around to reading news from 12/14/...2001 ?

152 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:52:58am

#144 Old Buick Tanker 2/3/2005 09:44AM PST

Baloney. There are respected people quoting the asshat. The asshat is denying he said what he said, and poorly at that. It is a story, and given the nature, size, and scope of the asshat's organization, it's a HUGE story. Or should be.


Exactly.

Look no further than here.

Which is referenced here.

Two different individuals are reporting what Jordan said, including a former CNN journalist.

153 Abe of Lincoln  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:54:04am

Well, if the journalists were CNN employees, you couldn't call it "friendly fire."

154 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:57:38am

#148 Havoc--

Yeah, I have a vivid mental image of that poor Gordon kid, endlessly tomented in the schoolyard. Now it's trying to take its revenge in a much bigger schoolyard, still trying to exorcise those long-ago demons.

As an aside, greetings to the musical Mrs. Havoc. Oh, to have been a young Brahms luxuriating in Clara's arms...

155 Bostonian  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:00:16am

#115: "Matthews is saying that the 'hug was staged'"

This is such a failure of imagination on Matthews's part.


Does he really think that there are no people in Iraq who mourn their dead?

Does he really think that none of those people might share a bond with Americans who've also lost their own?

Does it find it so incredible that the bond itself might rest in part on the common role of Saddam Hussein?


Matthews speaks without thinking.

156 TotallySirius  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:01:22am

When a story is on the newswire and not a single MSM outlet carries it,the only conclusion is that they are ignoring the story.

Case closed.

157 reader  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:02:30am

Its here, the book we've been waiting for. The Myth of Islamic Tolerance, a collection of essays by some of our favorite authors, including Bat Ye'or, and edited by Robert Spencer [see his site]. I'm going to make sure this gets into some of our local libraries, just as I have many other authors' titles. If it helps get it on the shelves, simply donate your own copy. Most libraries operate from very tight budgets. I've done it both ways. Libraries take books that circulate. That's the bottom line.

158 Beagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:02:31am

Eason Jordan is upset he can't plot murder with his buddy Uday any more.

159 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:02:54am

I read on LGF yesterday that there is both a video and a transcript of Eason's speech...plus the speech was attended by lots of public figures and heavyweights like Barney Frank and David Gergen, not to mention other terror-sponsoring journalists.

If somebody is not forthcoming with either the video or the transcript, then that is DELIBERATE. If the video exists and it is being withheld, that is DELIBERATE.

It's called burying the evidence, something the media is very, very, very accomplished at.

160 Old Buick Tanker  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:03:03am

Havoc,

Ouch! You're right, and I need to enhance my Date-and-Currency-Checker (tm).

10 points off of on my "Altar of U.S. Imperialism"... ;^(

161 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:03:11am
162 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:04:35am

#159 FB,

That is why I used the Wannsee conference as an example.

I respect that Barney Frank "stood up to Jordan", but that said this smells of 'conspiracy'.

163 narley  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:04:58am

Rayra #116

You make a very important point. The chattering bloviation heads - having no concept of how things work, and don't work in the real world - hold reality hostage to their gross assumption that outcomes are ALWAYS the result of specific intention or specific, intentional negligence. Their sheltered view of the world IS that simplistic and will always fail to provide any significant depth of understanding.

In war, people die in an *unfair* way. My brothers give their lives in order to enhance the security of my children's future and afford others (to whom we owe nothing) the priveledge of living in a civil society in their own land.

164 Eagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:05:26am

#95 Mentat

The absence of "black thought"? I think I heard that one on the radio this morning. Imagine the poor kids who hear this nonsense, and conclude they cannot think using their brains, but instead using their skin color. Who is the final arbiter of what is acceptable "black thought"? Who determines what whites are allowed to think?

Sad. Welcome to higher education!

165 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:05:56am

#157 reader---

I asked 2 metropolitan area libraries about Bat Ye'or's forthcoming Eurabia...and they got back to me that they have no intention of ordering it or carrying it.

Doesn't dovetail with their "agenda," apparently.

166 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:06:51am

Also the emotions were truly high for both of them. Why would Matthews go with "They had to have been instructed ahead time to hug"? It was incredibly more likely to happen than not. Going by probabilities in making an educated guess? Matthews must have other influences than logic.

167 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:07:16am

Havoc,

Charles keeps him for amusement, but don't waste your time on him, he's a 7 year old walkin' around in a 35 year old body.

I imagine Gordon to be about 75 or so, not 35.

168 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:08:05am

#155 Bostonian,

The sad thing is that the pain and respect was likely real.

Saddam Hussein destroyed a lot of GI's marriages and caused them a lot of grief with his intransigence necessitating round robin 180 day rotations for 10+ years.

Not all wounds are mortal.

not that I am trying to equate the supreme sacrifice with the emotional grief the entire Persian Gulf era caused.

169 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:08:29am

#136 zulubaby

900 released from jail and at least one on his way in.

It's déjà vu all over again...

170 yesandno  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:08:39am

This is not about Gordon...this is not about the word deliberately.

Jordan has equated the word "nuance" with the word "lie". That is because there is so much empty space in the cranial cavity, things just knock about against each other and change meaning before getting spit out.

He can backpeddle all he wishes. His original statement stands and we all get to interpret as we wish, not as he wants us to. Had he meant to say it differently he would have. The rest is BS.

"Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool then to open it and remove all doubt." Don't know who said that, but it applies. ... applies to Gordon as well...

171 Eagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:09:30am

#102 Thom

Didn't know it before, but I have been suspicious of the UN for some time now!

172 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:09:45am

Mr Pol, I wonder if it will ever end. The madness and chaos, I mean.

173 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:10:24am

#172 zulubaby

I don't think it will.

174 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:10:42am

sven10077--

Is it possible Barney "stood up" to Jordan because Jordan refused his advances? (OK, that's a cheap shot).

But seriously, why isn't Barney being interviewed by the MSM about this? (Well, we know the answer).

He's an unimpeachable liberal source, after all.

175 doubledip  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:10:47am

Slightly OT-

Seems the MSM was recently a bit too eager to nail Blair over doodles initially attributed to him, but later found to belong to Bill Gates.

176 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:12:47am

#174 Firebreather, deliberation on the part of the MSM?

177 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:13:19am

#154 Firebreather

Don't get ME goin' on that one, ... in Brahms dreams ... and in his drippy letters.

The Lovely and Talented Mrs. Havoc, Plays the Brahms piano Fantasy, but other than that, ... he could never satisfy her.


BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

178 Smitty  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:14:18am

#170 yesandno

Mark Twain? Not confirmed, just sounds like something old Mark would say...

179 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:14:58am

#171 Eagle

North America's premiere mosque

180 farng!  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:15:35am

#167 Zulubaby

Unfortunately, Gordon and others of his ilk come in all ages, sizes, sexes, colors...

181 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:17:09am

#167 Zulubaby

Hmmm ... yah, early onset of senile dementia could explain it.

182 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:17:54am

I imagine Gordon to be in his early 50s, but there's a simple reason for that...15 years ago I worked with a moonbat bartender/screenwriter-wannabe named Gordon. It was about 5'3" inches tall, overweight but not fat, with thick black hair. He/it adored clueless democrats, was extreme in all his/its thinking.

Now, whenever Nodrog posts, I picture the real Gordon I once knew, argued, and debated with.

183 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:18:30am

Here's something for a laugh, especially you outdoorsie types

Why people don't dive with their kayaks

184 Rufus Lee King  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:18:30am

175

Don't even know a Yankee doodle when they see one.

sorry

185 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:19:16am

OT: Remember the Oct. 15th, 2003 terrorist attack? 3 US citizens killed, one US diplomat wounded... Well, State Dept. got over it.

186 tigger2005  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:19:20am

It seems to me that when one ignores something, one always does it deliberately.

You have to know that it's there to "ignore" it. Otherwise you're just "unaware" of it.

To ignore something is a choice.

The MSM cannot possibly be unaware of the Eason Jordan flap. They also cannot possibly be unaware of the explosive nature of his accusations. The U.S. military with a policy of killing and even torturing journalists? That's bigger than Abu Ghraib! Yet, no stories anywhere. The MSM has clearly chosen not to give it any attention.

Charles could have just said "It's being ignored" and meant the same thing. But it's pretty common today for people to add "deliberately" for emphasis.

nodroG is really fishing here.

187 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:21:14am

#186 tigger2005

I don't think we need to prove CNN is aware of the story - and they're not reporting it.

188 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:23:06am

#176 Roger-- Yes, deliberation from the MSM...who would've thunk them capable of such calculated duplicity and cynicism, huh? Certainly not us!

#177 Havoc--- Given the "romantic" times, I think it possible that Brahms and Clara "did it," especially after Robert went bonkers. And while Brahms isn't known for his symphonies, I actually esteem the 3rd and 4th pretty highly, and enjoy them more than his "academic" works.

189 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:23:08am
190 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:23:14am
191 tigger2005  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:24:17am

BTW--Eason's explanation is "surprisingly" lame?

Really, Charles, what kind of explanation did you expect?

192 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:24:48am
193 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:28:35am

#118 Rayra

Oy vey.

LOL! Yiddish suits you.

194 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:30:25am

#192 Pulchritudinous Patriot

Funny, BTW they just canceled Star Trek...

195 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:31:35am

The Swift Vets story and Rathergate were ignored by the MSM for weeks, but their hand was forced by talk radio/bloggers, and they eventually ran the stories (while simultaneously trying to debunk them and smear the vets & bloggers).

I think the Eason Jordan thing could play out similarly...if we get a massive e-mail campaign going against CNN, the talk radio guys burn up the airwaves, and we keep kicking it around here on the Net.

Give them MSM a week or so to begin reporting it...uh, I mean downplaying/minimizing it.

196 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:31:42am

#191 tigger2005

Eason's explanation is "surprisingly" lame?

Yup. Even "I misspoke" would have been better.

what kind of explanation did you expect?

Not an 'explanation' that basically says 'I'm totally insane and can't speak English', anyway.

197 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:32:14am

#194 Peacekeeper...

Too bad, although I stopped watching when ST:TNG ended.

I just love that Jean-Luc Picard..;~sigh~

198 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:32:43am
199 Havoc  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:35:22am

#188 - Firebreather

Given the "romantic" times, I think it possible that Brahms and Clara "did it," especially after Robert went bonkers

Lot's of things are "Possible" including a bunker under the Denver Airport with a secret Nitrogen Chamber and a Lizaroid Master from another planet.

C'mon ... The Schumanns were two of the most famous people of their time... and she had kids. Only proof you have is some drippy musings in Brahms letters.

This younger man older woman thing has got to stop, let go,
, it will come to no good ...

Except in my case, the lovely and talented Mrs. Havoc is older , by a little .

200 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:35:31am

#123 Zulubaby: Your little link to the LGF Eason Jordan shrine didn't address by question to Charles one little bit. And then you ad your usual ad hominems.

Either you're thick, or you're so schooled in Apartho-logic that it's impossible to wash out.

201 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:36:59am

Iran wants peace and happiness everywhere. Beards on all the men and sheets over the women. Who can argue with that.

202 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:37:49am

Charles:

Have you, by any chance, been able to get a copy of a video or transcript of the event in which Mr. Jordan made the remarks?

I have not.

I agree with Gordon in the respect that to say that the MSM is 'deliberately' ignoring the story is harsh, considering the lack of real evidence that there is corroborating the story. To report the story without hard evidence would be something akin to what CBS did about the President's ANG records.

203 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:38:26am

OT...

It is my firm (and horrified) belief that Hillary Clinton will be our next President.

Think about it.

1. The only real competition she will have at the primary level is John Kerry, who has proven himself to be a delusional lying traitor over and again. The blogosphere stands ready to thoroughly trash Kerry with his own speculative fiction.

2. Anti-war, anti-rationality John Dean (Yeearrrggg!") is going to head the DNC.

3. Bush has a number of policies that even his supporters don't care for, including profligate domestic spending, an unfinanced border security coupled with the unpopular "wishful thinking" work passes for Mexican laborers. Plus, Social Security reform, while necessary, is going to be a major issue in the years to come--thanks to Dem Demagoguery ("democrat" "demagoguery"--a coincidence? you be the judge) and the increasing population of retiring Baby Boomers.

4. Hilary is positioning herself as a "Moderate."

The set-up is complete. With no viable Republican competition on the horizon, and no realistic Democrat to challenge her, Hillary can easily (and with some "reluctance") save the Democratic Party from the stranglehold of the far Left. In addition to a relieved and unanimous Democratic vote, she'll get the Anybody-but-a-Republican vote, the AARP vote, even some of the Republican vote (those who disagree strongky with Bush's domestic policies but support him for his exemplary foreign policy).

It will happen. Pleasant dreams.

204 YogSothoth  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:39:51am

Back at ya, Immortal ;-).

Lest anyone suspect otherwise, I am most assuredly *not* Gordon. Look people, one of the things I like about being on our side of this debate is that we generally tend to be more scrupulous about using reason and logic than our opponents.
This is a good thing. Let me illustrate - I am pro-death penalty but used to use the argument "Well, I'd rather see them put to death than spend all that tax $$$ to keep them in prison for life". As it turns out, it actually costs more to kill them than it does to keep them in prison for life. Once I became aware of this fact, I ceased to use that line of reasoning in my arguments. If your point of view is based upon reason and logic you only dilute it by allowing it to be associated with non-rational thinking.

Now, the hypothesis here is: "The MSM is deliberately ignoring this story". Certainly that is a possible conclusion, but is it the correct one? Well, given that foxnews has no track record of burying stories that paint leftists in a bad light one has to either assume that they've made an exception in this case or that some other reason is the correct one.

Are all of y'all who are in disagreement with me prepared to explain why foxnews has deliberately buried this story?
Are you prepared to predict that foxnews will continue to not cover it should a transcript, video or tape become available?
If not, why not?

Let's leave bad reasoning that happens to bolster one's point of view to the leftists, shall we? We're on the right side here folks, our point of view doesn't need this sort of "help" to win out in the end.

205 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:39:56am

@200 Nodrog

Well I see mr.snarky himself has graced Charles' site once again with his illformation.
Sure wish someone would do some dental work on you boy, maybe that'd shut you up for awhile. Better yet send you packing to the realm of VFI.

206 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:40:03am

#200 Gordon

"#123 Zulubaby: Your little link to the LGF Eason Jordan shrine didn't address by question to Charles one little bit. And then you ad your usual ad hominems."

I agree with with you Gordo! You deserve some UNusual ad hominems.

207 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:07am

In Jordan, they love Eason Jordan for his name. Muslim Jordanians just think Eason Jordan is the greatest westerner there is, even better than Robert Fisk and Michael Moore...and Eason's sociopolitical views are exactly the same as most Muslims. They're all "victims" of America. Their mutual victimhood and perceived martyrdom has forged quite a spirit of camaraderie.

It's a mutual admiration society. I wouldn't be surprised to see Eason in a headdress, with a goatee, mounting a camel, holding a Koran, to curry more favor with his adoring audience.

Jihad now. Jihad forever. It's Eason's credo.

208 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:11am

OMG...the spirit of Gordon is moving me-I mean-moving my bowels...Gaaa. I can't control it...it's sending a message...

It says: "ZULUBABY-oh child of apartheid-and right wing Jooo-how dare you try to duel with MOI the master of the blogosphere-and compete for the attention of THE LIZARD MASTER?"

Now it's crying-I can't figure out what it's saying...wait-I think I'm getting another message...

"ZULUBABY-GET USED TO IT...President Kerry...".

That's all I can pick up now-I've lost the frequency now.

209 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:26am
Apartho-logic

Fuck off, Gordon.

210 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:32am
211 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:33am

#202 PS,

To report the story without hard evidence would be something akin to what CBS did about the President's ANG records.


Sorry I disagree, there is nothing being said about wanting the MSM to use their happy magic time machine and gin-up some forgeries to sex up their story. The MSM has more than they run on many stories with, and why would Jordan be engaging in damage control if not for a brushfire that needed putting out? The MSM should at a minimum be investigating the story and interviewing attendees while keeping viewers abreast of the issue.

They are failing in their reporting duties with as much aplomb as they exceeded them in the Memogate affair.

212 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:41:36am

"strongky"?

PIMF

Shoulda been "strongly"

A pox on the chiclet keyboards on laptops!

213 bigel[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:42:13am
214 Studsup  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:42:17am

I believe that the Defense Department should instruct every branch of our services that logistical support and protection for CNN correspondents and staff should be denied. The purpose of the order is to protect the reputation of our military services. No more armed guards and transport for reporters, camera crews etc. The less contact our military has with CNN, the fewer opportunities for CNN to slander and undermine our military and its mission.

As for CNN staff and stringers embedded with terrorist units, well, they take their chances along with the rest of their terrorist friends and allies.

215 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:42:25am

WriterMom, LOL! He is so lame.

216 W-lover  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:42:30am

nodroG-

What the f*** are you on? Where is your proof that the story is not being ignored by the media?

Put up, or shut up...

217 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:42:36am

#200 nodroG

CNN is aware of the story, and knows it's a story, as the lame 'explanations' prove. CNN is a news organization whose job is to report stories. They have chosen NOT to report this one. In other words, CNN has deliberately ignored this story. And CNN is part of the MSM. Hence, the MSM have deliberately ignored this story.

218 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:44:40am

#210 Rayra

Transfer. And devastatingly aggressive counter-battery fire on any subsequent lobbing of ordnance over the borders.

Won't happen.

219 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:45:16am

@204


Lest anyone suspect otherwise, I am most assuredly *not* Gordon.

Oh, I dunno know. You've been here a couple of months, posted 3 times and struttin' around like you own the place already.
You might fool some of the people about who you are.

220 pookleblinky  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:45:23am

OT

Did anyone else see this Cox & Forkum cartoon?

221 texanista  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:46:07am

ya just gotta laugh at such sanctimonius misanthropes. LOL
GAZE

222 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:46:13am

#211 sven10077

Sorry I disagree, there is nothing being said about wanting the MSM to use their happy magic time machine and gin-up some forgeries to sex up their story. The MSM has more than they run on many stories with, and why would Jordan be engaging in damage control if not for a brushfire that needed putting out? The MSM should at a minimum be investigating the story and interviewing attendees while keeping viewers abreast of the issue.

Agreed. Irresponsible news agencies are out there and they do run with much less. However, it is those same irresponsible news agencies that have agendas so glaring that they would ignore the story if it hurt their cause. Responsible news agencies will investigate...get a copy of the transcript...contact Mr. Jordan and ask that he appear in rebuttal or submit a response...THEN run with it.

223 Studsup  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:46:58am

#209 zulubaby -- "Apartho-logic".

I find that to have been a rather nasty insult coming, as it did, from this blog's resident infidelophobe.

224 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:47:00am

Gordon,

Your fastball, such as it was, has lost about 20 MPH. You're just getting by on junk. And everybody is whacking your junk over the center field bleachers. Batting practice fastballs don't cut it in the Big Leagues.

225 Millie Woods  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:47:01am

Oh dear that Gordon chappie! One imagines a nightmare scenario where he ends up as your dinner partner at a party and you have to listen to his boring tautologies for a whole evening because the host had it in for you and deliberately* placed you there .
BTW isn't there a group called journalists without borderrs which publishes annual statistics about journos being killed on the job? The numbers are quite significant.
*That's deliberately

226 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:48:42am

This is Just Plain Wrong Man...


As you can see I am having a slow day at work.

227 mcbain  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:49:31am

OT: Skateboard accident on the Moon!

Even in 1/6 gravity, accidents happen. Please, kids, wear your safety equipment at all times!

(This link expires at midnight on 02/03/05 - after that, you'll have to look in the APOD archives for this to make any sense...)

228 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:50:12am

#225 Millie Woods

Among the self-proclaimed Fwench 'elites' there is one game I find both disgusting and very funny: the Diner de cons. The idea is, for a group of self-proclaimed 'elites', to each invite to a dinner one person (not a member of the 'elites'), and make it as stupid a person as possible. The player who invited the most stupid person wins.

nodroG, what are you doing Saturday evening? I'm inviting you for dinner.

229 W-lover  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:50:43am

pookle-

That kicks ass! And I believe that particular jackasses name is Gordon!

230 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:51:40am

#217 Mr Pol

Good point.

Gordon...

Charles isn't REPORTING the news...he is providing commentary.

Commentary is exactly that. He calls it as he sees it. He believes, obviously, that the MSM in general is deliberately ignorning the item.

I would argue that with MOST msm outlets it is probably not deliberate. MOST would prefer to see CNN sink completely, and I am sure that if a transcript or video of the event becomes available, FOX, particularly, would be all over it.

231 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:51:47am

#228 Mr Pol

I saw a movie (French) with that plot! People actually do that?

I'm inviting krazykounselor.

232 William  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:51:49am
has anyone in the MSM called Jf'nK on his delivering "guns to the Khmer Rouge" comment last Sunday?

An excellent question.  Looks like a big "NO" so far.
 

233 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:52:04am

#199 Havoc--- OK, I can live with Brahms and Clara being platonic. But Wagner's first wife was older than he was...and don't forget Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway. Older women "know things."

/Another guy with an older wife (3 years)

234 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:52:49am
235 Malleus Dei  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:52:59am

It must be nice being a big shot at CNN and never having to worry about ever being called to account for anything that you say by the MSM.

236 farng!  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:53:16am

#200 Gordon

Put a cold compress on your forehead and ask mommy to put you in the crib for your afternoon nap. Someone's a cranky little fella...

237 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:53:40am

#231 Thom

I saw a movie (French) with that plot! People actually do that?

Yes. Hence the movie.

I'm inviting krazykounselor.

Against THE nodroG? Hah!

238 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:54:36am

Ok, last one...I need to stop with the Starbucks already

There is no Hell, there is only France

239 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:55:58am

#233 Firebreather

OK, I can live with Brahms and Clara being platonic.

For Chopin and George Sand, there is proof it wasn't platonic. Listen carefully to the mazurkas, and you'll hear her moving under the piano.

240 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:56:54am

#237 Mr Pol

But just look at my idiot!

241 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:56:55am

#202 pilgrim shadow:

To report the story without hard evidence would be something akin to what CBS did about the President's ANG records.

Not even close. Stories and angles within stories are reported all the time where there is no "hard evidence" but there are witnesses to the events. That's a far cry from using a partisan nutjob with a dubious and unverifiable story, describing him as "unimpeachable" while cloaking him in anonymity, helping him work with a political party in an ongoing campaign, and dismissing every credible expert and witness who says the evidence is forged and/or erroneous.

Seriously, how did you even think about equating the two?

242 BIG  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:56:59am

I picked up my local fishwrap the other day and I saw a story about how the IDF murdered a 10 year old Palestinian girl. Their only source was some Hamas guy that says it was Jews that killed her. Nice big headlines on the article.

Yesterday I read on the internet about how a Palestinian was arrested for her murder. It seems it was impossible for her to be shot by the IDF and she died because some moron fired his gun in the air.

So I pick up my fishwarp and expect to see a retraction...

THe MSM only reports what it wants to report. This is a story they don't want to report. It is like a tree falling in a forest, if they don't report it, it will never make a sound.

243 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:58:04am

@233

/Another guy with an older wife (3 years)

Hey, there ain't nothing wrong with that. :)

244 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:58:07am

#234 Rayra

polite well-worded equivocating crap is still just that.
complete bullshit. We've got at least two corroborating witnesses - a Lib congressman and a former CNN co-worker of Jordan's - and a huge historical trail of similarly phrased accusations about 'military targeting journalists' uttered by Jordan.
245 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:58:17am

#240 Thom

One comment. No stamina.

246 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:58:30am

relax hon

247 YogSothoth  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:58:56am

Believe what you like, quark2 - but a quick email to charles and an examination of the his apache log will prove otherwise.

As far as "strutting around like I own the place" I don't guess you believe in sharpening ones wits with actual debate. You know, the reason so many leftists get obliterated during political arguments is that they are so insular. It is trivial for a left-leaning person to *never* encounter the very best reasoning from the right - not possible for us on the other side of the aisle. I personally think that it is a feature (rather than a bug) to test your skills against the very best your opponents can muster, how otherwise can you really know the strength of your arguments?

Have you never heard the phrase: "Is your line of reasoning so feeble that it cannot withstand criticism?". Is this not exactly what we excoriate the defenders of islamofacism for doing? Do we not revel when cretins like Ward Churchill come face-to-face with people not in his "amen corner" for the first time? Are we like him or the people who hand him his ass?

248 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:59:16am
249 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:59:29am

"And today in sports... Gordon, AKA "Nodrog," has been placed on irrevocable waivers for the purpose of giving him his unconditional release. Nodrog was acquired 2 years ago by LGF for a mop, 2 Hefty Bags, and a can of Drano. For 2 years, LGF regulars played Fungo with Gordon, and Gordon worked as a ball retriever and batting practice dummy...

but now an aging Nodrog, once LGF's resident Court Jester, serves no particular purpose..."

250 Paul  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 8:59:41am

This thread has gone from being about Eason Jordan's dissembling to being about nodroG's snideness and his ability to send LGFers into a tizzy.

We've got better things to talk about.

251 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:00:01am

#240 Thom

"YogSothoth" looks promising... what do you think?

252 Powderfinger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:00:50am

#234 Rayra

But it could have been produced on an IBM Selectric Composer using 4 different type balls and a slide rule... You can't prove it wasn't, right?

/oblivious

253 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:01:22am

#245 Mr Pol

One comment hell! Go, and see stupidity in full bloom. :)

254 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:02:00am

Gordon is on the menu...quick-buy stock in Immodium.

255 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:02:15am

#253 Thom

Ouch. OK. I'll invite Kos. So there.

256 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:02:25am

I'm not arguing that the story has no credibility.

If you are familiar with my posts...I'm far from an apologist for any LL news organization. When we hit them with the Rathergate scandal...we didn't do it with innuendo and with 'he said / she said' crap...we hit them with the facts...right between the eyes. If you want to see this guy get fired and run out of town, you don't do it with the information we have right now.

But I would BET that somebody...somewhere...has a video. And I, for one, would LOVE to get my hands on it. I'd love to back up the things that have been said with fact...and slam it down his dhimmi throat!

257 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:02:57am

#239 Mr. Pol---

Only a French woman could be named George.

258 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:04:09am

OT: Major terrorist attack thwarted today in Jerusalem. Hudna, anybody?

259 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:05:10am

#257 Firebreather

Her real name was Aurore Dupin.

260 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:05:37am
261 William  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:06:16am

Check out the Washington Post on that unbelievable moment during the State of the Union when the

262 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:07:24am

When the video becomes available...assuming there were people in the audience and one of them thought to bring their camcorder...and decides he/she wants to make a few bucks...

It'll be on Drudge...it'll be on Fox...then sooner or later it'll pop up on the rest of the MSM EXCEPT, of course, CNN.

263 Sarah D.  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:07:28am

Sorry if this has already been posted.

'Celebrity Backlash' Helped Re-Elect Bush, Actor Says

"The Democratic Party has to make a decision of which way they are going to go. If they want to go the way of Howard Dean, if they want to go the way of [Al] Sharpton, if they want to got the way of [Dennis] Kucinich, that is a choice that the party makes and I think they will forever condemn themselves to minority status," Silver said.

A big Thank You to Michael Moore for helping get Bush re-elected!

264 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:07:46am

#260 Rayra

Lock the gates. Cut off the utilities and Israeli-provided humanitarian support.

Won't happen. Which means

Let the murder factions there rip out their guts for a few years.

won't happen either.

265 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:10:46am

#264 Mr Pol

Won't happen

Still a great idea though...

266 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:11:10am

#264 Mr Pol

Wont happen


Not in the NEAR future...but in the long run, the Palestinians will have to be DEFEATED. Its the only thing they really understand.

267 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:11:11am

Mr Pol (#258)

OT: Major terrorist attack thwarted today in Jerusalem. Hudna, anybody?

Look at this crap -- Abbas Says Palestinians Will Call Cease-Fire Feb. 8

I mean if he's calling for a cease-fire, why not do it right now, today? Does anyone actually believe that the Palestinians can give up their addiction to Jewish blood?

268 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:12:16am

#259 Mr. Pol---

You're right...but she also smoked cigars.

269 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:12:29am

#251 Mr Pol

Hmm. I am partial to the sanctimonious ones ...

YogSothoth - are you free Saturday? We're having a dinner party in Gay Paree. Mr Pol is quite handy in the kitchen, so you'll have a great time.

270 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:12:59am
271 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:13:14am

#261 William

This is nothing but anti-Bush liberal bias.

When a dog pees on a fire hydrant, is it vandalism?

272 Globular Cluster  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:14:29am

It isn't clear to me what Jordan hopes to gain by distinguishing between collatoral damage and mistaken identity. Both result in the undesired, accidental death of a non-combatant.

273 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:14:50am

#268 Firebreather

You're right...but she also smoked cigars.

So did Monica. Well, OK, she didn't exactly smoke 'em...

274 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:14:56am

#267 zulubaby

I mean if he's calling for a cease-fire, why not do it right now, today? Does anyone actually believe that the Palestinians can give up their addiction to Jewish blood?

Just another diversion to try and perpetuate the illusion that they will really participate in negotiations. This is just a BS ploy to buy more time and generate more sympathy from the Pali lovers...

275 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:15:22am
276 freedomsound  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:15:27am

If someone is shot, obviously they must have been fired upon. When you fire a weapon you are always targeting something even if you aren't aiming at the thing you are targeting, or even aiming at anything at all for that matter. Thus, journalists are being targeted in Iraq. That's what I meant. I was simply misquoted. Look at the little monkey.

/Eason Jordan

277 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:16:08am

#272 Globular Cluster

It's called BACKTRACK

weak, desperate, feeble attempt...
before the video comes out...
and I think it will come out.

278 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:16:33am

#272 Globular Cluster

It isn't clear to me what Jordan hopes to gain by distinguishing between collatoral damage and mistaken identity. Both result in the undesired, accidental death of a non-combatant.

He's attempting to deny that 'journalists' were actually embedded with terrorists - while at the same time trying to blame the US.

279 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:16:54am

OT?


Gordon- this seems appropriate


Apartho-logic?


I expected better.

280 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:17:41am

Yeah "another woman" sort of misses the meaning of what went on...

I think at least ONE Iraqi said, "thanks from the grateful people of TWO nations"...


the press sure has a tin ear.

281 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:18:30am

@251 MrPol

Yep. :)


Look here is a good reason why.

If you are familiar with my posts

Yeah all 5 of them. OooAaah!

Think it comes with replaceable parts? *lol

282 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:19:18am

We can argue all day about what kind of journalism standards are necessary before running with a story.

Why would anyone believe that if FNC had their hands on information potentially damaging to CNN they wouldn't come out with both guns blasting?

283 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:19:25am
284 mardukhai  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:19:39am

Actually, if you read what this idiot wrote, he doen't even know what he says.

It's a mess of internal contradictions. Why was he reacting to Frank's observation of "collateral damage" if they were indeed killed by mistake.

Because he is an idiot, and he doesn't want to admit it.

285 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:20:12am

There is a "smoking gun" on Eason Jordan even if the videotape and transcript are burned... Celebrities like Frank and Gergen, who attended the speech, can attest to what was said, if they wish to.

As good liberals, they can sugarcoat the comments or instruct us on how to "interpret" what Eason said ("I think...what he MEANT to say...was...").

But very visible people can reconstruct the speech, if not verbatim, than the crux of it. They probably wouldn't put their own credibility at risk by lying to cover up for a sack of shit like Eason Jordan.

286 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:20:44am

#271 Mr Pol, more like relief.

287 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:20:59am

IMMORTAL_CTHULHU (#274)

This is just a BS ploy to buy more time and generate more sympathy from the Pali lovers...

... and receive that $350,000,000.

288 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:21:16am

#267 zulubaby

Does anyone actually believe that the Palestinians can give up their addiction to Jewish blood?

Not a chance...but never mind...Purim is coming up, and you know what that means-my special Hamentachen with gentile blood.

Bwahahhahahaaha!

289 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:21:52am

#287 zulubaby

... and receive that $350,000,000.

Ah, yes. Never forget the jyzia...

290 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:22:07am

@270 Rayra


Okay. shhh!

291 levi from queens  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:22:41am

Perhaps we need something like MEMRI to publish in America the overseas quotes of American MSM-- just as showing what Arabs say in Arabic is different than what they say in English.

292 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:23:16am

#273 Mr. Pol--

Clinton's grand jury testimony: "But it wasn't burning when I put it in...the cigar, I mean..."

293 Sarah D.  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:23:53am

Maureen Dowd is sounding worried. Everything she holds dear is in danger. Big Bad Bush will destroy it all.

Inherit the windbags

He doesn’t just want to dismantle the ’60s, he wants to dismantle the whole century—from the Scopes trial to Social Security. He can shred one of the greatest achievements of the New Deal and then go after other big safety-net Democratic programs, reversing the prevailing philosophy of many decades that our tax and social welfare systems should equalize the distribution of wealth, just a little bit. Barry Goldwater wouldn’t have had the brass to take a jackhammer to that edifice.


...

With their brutal assault on history and their sanctimonious manner, they give a whole new meaning to Teddy’s philosophy of the presidency. Bully pulpit, indeed.

She's running scared.

294 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:24:03am

#287 zulubaby

Your right - never forget the cash...

295 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:24:05am
296 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:25:01am

OT: I just placed my first football bet. They purposely asked people who haven't got a clue about football for their contributions to the office pool. That would be me.

297 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:25:06am

#295 Rayra

What is your solution / path forward?

Who cares? Nodoby seem to want a solution.

298 levi from queens  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:26:02am

282--Pilgrim Shadow --FNC is good on some things. But they have apparently struck a bargain with Beijing to be allowed into that market. Never trust the NYPost or FNC on China. If they can strike one such deal, they may have others.

299 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:26:22am

#296 WriterMom

Sucker. :)

So what was the bet?

300 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:27:27am

297 Mr.Pol,

exactly-not even Israel as a whole.

IF israel were unified and on a near war footing it would be a LOT easier for us to reject the prevailing world view that the Jorgyptians are the "poor blessed aggrieved ones" but when a prtion of Israel itself wants to go Neville Chamberlain what are we to do?

301 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:28:02am

#270 Rayra

lol...sorry

302 greenmamba  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:28:05am

#200 Gordon

Zulubaby ... Either you're thick, or you're so schooled in Apartho-logic

Ascribing "Apartho-logic" to zulubaby simply because she hails from South Africa requires logic akin to racism Gordon. Welcome to "Die Klub."

Besides, I have it on good authority that zulubaby is really Suzie Mtwetwe and she spent much time in Camperdown, a few short miles from her birthplace of Durbs-by-the-sea, where she attended the Madrassa of Welcome to Ask-Imam.com, the online fatwa resource! As we speak your I.P. address is being tracked and you can expect a "visit" any time from her Man In Black with a view to recruitment.

303 mardukhai  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:28:29am

#9 jscorse

Jordon seems to lay out some points that are worth investigating- I hope people at this site take seriously the issue of journalists being killed in Iraq even if you don't like the messenger.

JS -- He lays out no points at all. Covering war is inherently dangerous. I once interviewed a military expert in "friendly fire" cases, and he told me that two percent of the time, soldiers open fire on their own, and there is very little that can be done to reduce this.
The more technology advances, the faster war becomes, and the more mistakes that will be made. And if you try too hard to reduce friendly fire casualties, you slow down the tempo of operations, and thus increase casualties by lengthening the war and giving the enemy time to react.
Like every extremist posing as a moderate, you aren't one.
Read some books, visit military bases. Learn something.

304 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:28:52am

#297 Mr Pol

The only solution the Pali's want is the total destruction of Irael.

305 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:30:25am

#298 Levi

Maybe...but you can't convince me that they would kill a story damaging to CNN.

306 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:30:50am
307 Luigi  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:30:53am

OT -- mutated strains

If Howard Hughes knew about this he'd probably be alive today. I'm getting a neti pot today.

308 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:31:06am

#304 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU

The only solution the Pali's want is the total destruction of Israel.

That's not a solution: that's the problem!

309 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:31:53am

@297 MrPol

Mans natural predication...to prognosticate. And usually until it's too late. :(

310 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:33:00am

#299 Thom

Moi?

New England 24 to 17. Am I totally embarrasing myself?

311 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:33:34am
312 TO'D  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:33:40am

Ailes has got to be laughing his geekers off.

313 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:34:55am

greenmamba,

Besides, I have it on good authority that zulubaby is really Suzie Mtwetwe ...

LOL! I'm crying from laughing so hard.

314 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:35:05am

#304 Mr Pol

I stand corrected sir! :-)

#300 sven10077

IF israel were unified and on a near war footing it would be a LOT easier for us to reject the prevailing world view that the Jorgyptians are the "poor blessed aggrieved ones" but when a prtion of Israel itself wants to go Neville Chamberlain what are we to do?

I cannot for the life of me understand the lemming-like behaviour of appeasers...It is almost like suicide by proxy

315 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:35:41am
316 EW1(SG)  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:37:23am

#267 zulubaby:

Does anyone actually believe...

Nobody with the common sense the Hashem gave a clod of dirt...

317 Sarah D.  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:37:28am

I'm glad I don't watch TV. And I'm really glad I don't watch TV in Great Britian.

Animated Frog's Genitals -- Okay for TV?

318 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:37:38am

#314 IC,

well see that's the thing I suspect that the national psychology of the Israeli left is like a battered wife...

the rest of the west is cheerily encouraging Lefty Israel to chase those purple footballs with some gin...

just amazing.

319 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:39:32am

#311 Rayra

To defeat an enemy, the only way is to fight it. In Sept. 2003 Bali terrorism was being defeated. So the talk of 'withdrawal' started. Now troops are being withdrawn from Gaza, Judea and Shomron, so that the Bali can rearm, and captured terrorists are being released, to make good their losses. Oh, and the US has already sent a $20 million jyzia and will send an additional $350 millions to the terrorists. And I'm supposed to think somebody wants to win?

320 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:42:11am

From Ha'aretz:

20:47 High-ranking IDF officer who lives in a settlement says will give up his Israeli citizenship if the pullout is implemented

He's wrong, but I know exactly how he feels.

321 endangered in Mass  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:42:28am

I am guessing that the journalists that have been killed by US forces were't embedded with the same but were covering the "insurgents"

How many pictures of insurgents firing RPG-7's at US forces have we seen that are take while standing next to the "insurgents"?


You reep what you sow.

322 azul93gt  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:42:33am

Since the MSM is not deliberately ignoring this story perhaps the Nodrog could give an alternate but more likely rationale as to why the MSM is under-reporting the story?

Let's face it the LLL-DNC-MSM alliance is under seige, and they are in full circle the wagons mode.

323 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:42:45am
Our readers are presumably aware of the controversy swirling around Eason Jordan, the top news guy at CNN, who allegedly charged at the World Economic Forum in Davos that American soldiers have deliberately killed journalists in Iraq. The controversy began with a report by the Forum's official blogger, Rony Abovitz, and continued as CNN issued a clarification yesterday. We posted on the issue here and here.

The Latest on Eason Jordan

324 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:43:31am
#315 Rayra 2/3/2005 11:35AM PST
#301 pilgrim shadow 2/3/2005 11:28AM PST
#270 Rayra
lol...sorry
Oh no. You aren't getting out of it that easy.

Nothing I said was meant to offend you as a woman...I thought you were a guy.

325 Bostonian  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:45:23am

#202:

To report the story without hard evidence would be something akin to what CBS did about the President's ANG records.

During the SBVT days, the lawyer-blogger Beldar pointed out that when he goes to court, the kind of evidence he likes best on his side is eyewitness testimony.

And that's just exactly what we've got.

***
Moreover, if that video proved that Jordan was misquoted, we would already have access to the video.

It is in CNN's financial interest to make the story go away. And in fact, CNN has been trying to make it go away, by sending email & posting its "rebuttal" on people's blogs. Yet... no video.

There's only one explanation: it makes Jordan look really really bad.

326 Ojoe  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:45:27am

Eason Jordan you SOB.

327 greenmamba  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:45:47am

#313 zb

LOL! I'm crying from laughing so hard.

Don't tell me it's a case of mistaken identity! Hammarsdale behind Rainbow Chicken Farm Shed #77632 ... it wasn't you!

328 endangered in Mass  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:46:21am

#325 Pilgram Shadow

Smoothed that one right out.

329 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:47:14am

Bonstonian

No doubt it makes him look very bad...even his defense is weak an not credible.

330 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:50:14am

#329 pilgrim shadow

Not credible? His defense is "I'm insane and can't speak English." Well, I believe it.

331 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:50:29am

@319 MrPol

Looks like a repeat of the very same mindset that prevailed in pre WWII europe.
Insanity.

OT

Over at PowerLine the guys have responded to another Trib faux pas.We Reply to the Star Tribune

We sent this column to the Minneapolis Star Tribune yesterday, in response to the attack on us which they printed on Monday:


In her January 31 Commentary column (“Note of caution is in order in the world of blogs”), Camille Gage alleges that we conveyed a false story regarding voter fraud in Wisconsin on our Power Line web site.
332 Shammer  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:50:34am

OT: Tales from the Iraqi election, and /OT off, tales of "journalists" living in the green zone

333 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:52:13am

#330 Mr Pol

lmao

I guess you can read between the lines and get that...

334 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:53:15am

#315 Rayra 2/3/2005 11:35AM PST

#301 pilgrim shadow 2/3/2005 11:28AM PST

#270 Rayra

lol...sorry

Oh no. You aren't getting out of it that easy.

Nothing I said was meant to offend you as a woman...I thought you were a guy.


Rayra! *LMAO!

335 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:53:16am

Heh, I wonder which he values more his ego/pretensions to intellect/integrity, or his job...

reminds me of how the MSM was always selling the notion Beijing Billy was William J. B. Clinton Supra-Genius...

unless he had stepped in dogshit like Waco or Filegate and he needed their aid facillitating the Bubba Bill comedy hour...

"aw shucks suh we is just dumb hilljacks from Ar-Kansas new to town(in 1994-9) and it are a B-yoo-a-cratic snafu..."

/cue Dukes of Hazard music

336 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:53:30am

#310 WriterMom

Nope.

337 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:54:11am

greenmamba,

Hammarsdale behind Rainbow Chicken Farm Shed #77632 ... it wasn't you!

That was you!? Wow ...

338 cleve  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:54:55am

Jordan should just learn Arabic and save himself a lot of trouble.

339 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:57:00am

#336 Thom

[whew!]

Then when I win the pool, I'll contribute a bottle of wine to that dinner party you were talking about...

340 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:58:11am

#339 WM,

Hey that is actually a really good pick...although maybe a touch high for the eagles as Owens will not be at full speed.

341 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:59:01am

#331 quark2

Looks like a repeat of the very same mindset that prevailed in pre WWII europe.

Not only in Europe. When Histadruth was created, David Gryn had to fight to have the world 'Jewish' added. In 1907, the creation of the Hachomer was opposed by almost everybody. Same thing for the Jewish Legion during WWI. It took the 1921 bloodbath to create the Haganah - and it was still opposed by most Jews as late as 1929.

342 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 9:59:24am

#339 WriterMom

LOL. Do you have a quest in mind?

343 mitzblitz  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:00:40am

Quark2:
Very interesting link.

"We're working two very, very big stories right now that have a couple of things in common. One is they're enormously costly, but more importantly or more worrying is that they're both exceptionally dangerous, because we've seen something in both places that I thank God happens very rarely, and that is that in both places journalists are not only being killed but they're being targeted. There are combatants in both of these conflicts who are trying to kill journalists, and that is unusual and a very nightmarish situation."

Looks clear to me. Targeting physically or mentally, the obfuscation doesn't hold up.

MM

344 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:01:50am

Gordon is, indeed, quite cranky. He is cranky because I will not give him a role in my upcoming movie, "All About Moi," which I plan to bring out in opposition to the upcoming Ridley-Scott idiocy, "Kingdom of Heaven." He is merely jealous because moi am going to be a star, and he is not!

Gordon, Gordon, if you were using Leper-King logic you would see, right away, that it is unthinkable that anyone but moi should play moi! (bad enough they've got that "Dude" from "Fight Club" impersonating me in that Ridley-Scott thing! And in a MASK, yet! Is this the Crusades or Dumas' "The Man in the Iron Mask?)

And you can't play Saladin, either! (That's the role you really wanted!) I told that Abbas is going to play Saladin! He doesn't know this yet; I believe his performance will be---heh, heh, heh---more "realistic" if we simply fall upon him unwares, for the big battle scenes, heh, heh, heh. . . Anyway, Saladin was a Kurd. You're a Troll.

I did offer you the role of Abu-ba-boo-boo, Saladin's court jester, but you turned it down! Now, quite sulking, and I will instruct my singing, psychic dolphins to send you some mental aromatherapy! Do you prefer violet or lavender thought waves?

/Actually, being in a mask wouldn't be so bad, if I could have the one from "The Mask," and the upcoming, "Son of The Mask"! Smokin'!

/Channeling Baldwin IV, The Leper King and Master of Apartho-logic, Leper-king logic, dolphin logic---coming soon to a theatre near you!

345 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:05:21am

OT: Official: Ukraine sold missiles to Iran, China

A senior lawmaker yesterday called for Ukraine's prosecutor-general to investigate alleged sales of nuclear-capable cruise missiles to Iran and China in violation of international nonproliferation treaties.
346 cathyf  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:05:42am

I'm wondering, does anybody else get this sort of queasy embarrassed feeling listening/reading people who have no clue at all how stupid they sound? Clearly Jordan doesn't know what "collateral damage" means.

Maybe I'm just softhearted... It's like what do you do if you see a total stranger with his fly down, or with the back of her dress tucked into the waistband of her pantyhose. Do you tell them? Do you flee in embarrassment?

cathy :-)

347 sandspur  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:08:10am

OT
Volker releasing interim OIF report. Does not cover performance of contractors. Does not cover Sec Council oversight. Full report midsummer. Major violations from outside UN oversight i.e. smugglers.

On FOX now

348 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:08:11am

#219 quark 2

Well, "Yog" certainly sounds like Gordon to me!

#267 Zulubaby

CEASEFIRE! Blah, blah, blah, PALESTINIANS CALL FOR CEASEFIRE! Blah, blah, blah, ABBAS REINS IN MILITANTS! Blah, blah, blah, CAN ABBAS REIN IN MILITANTS? Blah, blah, blah, blah, PALESTINIAN CEASEFIRE/ISRAEL RELEASES PRISONERS/CAN MILITANTS BE REINED IN BY ABBAS?

Blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahbl ahblah!

349 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:08:40am

#346 cathyf

I'm wondering, does anybody else get this sort of queasy embarrassed feeling listening/reading people who have no clue at all how stupid they sound?

Not I. Pointing and laughing is much more fun.

350 littleoldlady  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:08:57am

#336

THOM! Not infront of the Philadelphian - PLEASE! Have a little heart, will you?

351 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:09:35am

#348 TalkinKamel

Ha'aretz:

21:40 Israeli official, after talks with Palestinians reach dead end: 'They rejected the prisoner offer. They walked out'

Interesting, huh?

352 RebTex  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:11:47am

Sarah D.
THat leads to the question:
Is a frog's a$$ watertight?

353 Bunker Buster  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:12:50am

It's pretty clear that this guy is as anti-American as he is paranoid, and his paranoia is exceeded only by his anti-Americanism.

354 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:13:50am

OT

Fox News website had an advertising link to American Task Force, a website dedicated to a "Two State Solution". The website links to a Powerpoint Presentation that lays out information AS FACT about Israeli/Palestinian relations. They leave out certain key elements of the equation...go into great detail about Israel's land-grabbing conquest and 'occupation' of the poor little Palistinian people.

Then they go into detail about the two things standing in the way of peace in the Middle East.

1. George Bush (because of statements he made in a letter to Sharon...that seem pretty harmless and obvious to me)

2. The Security Barrier

what a joke...

Can I get some help debunking this page by page or is it a waste of time?

355 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:14:04am

#344 TalkinKamel

And I thought nodroG was cranky because he had his one cogent post for the year already - and almost no one noticed. (I think it came while he was out of koolaid.)

Or was it because Charles was profiled in the NY Sun, and nodroG wasn't - being as his delusions (not to mention the neighbors dog) have told him that he really is the conscience of LGF.

It's just pathetic to see it rant "deliberate" - "Prove it" - without knowing that every editor in the MSM makes conscience decisions as to what they think is news and what they want their readers / viewers to see (as opposed to giving the facts). Based on that, if no MSM outlets, almost a week after the event, report on it - those editors have deliberated and decided it is not newsworthy. Jordon himself doesn't seem to understand the issue (probably since getting a pass on this since 1993) - hence the very weak and lame defence.

All Jordan had to do, given the video / transcript, to support his claim is to produce them. The fact that he doesn't means they are damning to him.

So, rather than exercise proper damage control, CNN / Jordan are trying to stonewall, and with the tacit assistance of the rest of the MSM - who don't want to see another big win by the bloggers - they are hoping the story will die on the vine.

MSM hasn't learned anything. (But then, nodroG, neither do you, or the rest of the LLL).

356 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:14:57am

#351 Mr. Pol

"Interesting, huh?"

Yes, very! The Palestinians are playing the same old con game they played under Arafat!

(Blahblahblahblah. . . )

357 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:18:09am

#355 Athos

I do think Charles getting profiled might be one of the things that set the Nodrog off today. . .

(No, the MSM, the LLL's and Nodrog never learn.)

WriterMom

LOL!

358 Crusader  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:18:40am

#354 pilgrim shadow
"Can I get some help debunking this page by page or is it a waste of time?"

I'll take "waste of time" for a thousand, Alex.

Nobody who tacitly or overtly supports the Paleos would take the trouble to worry about *facts*--they're only interested in propoganda.

359 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:19:08am

#354 pilgrim shadow

Can I get some help debunking this page by page or is it a waste of time?

Probably a waste of time...the LLL can never be convinced that their cherished illusions are not FACT. There are so many falsehoods presented as FACT by the MMM , UN, NGO's and others that most people cannot seperate fact from fiction.

IC

360 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:19:21am

#357,

DADDY YOU DIDN'T EVEN MENTION ME!


/nodroG off

361 reader  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:19:47am

Zulubaby #267,

Look at this crap -- Abbas Says Palestinians Will Call Cease-Fire Feb. 8

I better inform the Easter Bunny. He hates having to stand in the shadow of the groundhog.

362 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:19:55am

#350 littleoldlady

Oops ... sorry.

WriterMom - you're gonna lose big time!

#354 pilgrim shadow

42 pages of bullshit. Ugh.

363 David Simon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:21:30am

#155 Sven 10077 -

Matthews is saying that the "hug was staged"...

Chris Matthews is a fat asshole.

"Hey lady, be my guest at the State of the Union Address. All you have to do is cry on camera, hug an Iragi woman and hand her your son's dog tags."

Buchanan is wrong: He's worse than cynical; he's downright malevolent.

364 chuck  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:21:34am

I thought the military's goal in Irak was to destroy islamic terrorism. If the goal is really to protect journalists, maybe we'll start getting some of them behind the war. And the troops.
It seems as if a lot of these "journalists" are in FRONT of our troops. I can't imagine them being shot by mistake if they're BEHIND our troops. That must mean a lot of them are with the enemy.

365 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:22:39am

Charles,
We need an Oil for Food thread, please!

That Volcker guy is proving very evasive.

366 littleoldlady  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:24:40am

#362 Thom

WriterMom - you're gonna lose big time!

That's better! (Sorry, WriterMom :-)

367 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:25:53am

OT
from the Jerusalem Post:

Brilliant essay in marxist-islamist fascism.

"America is like one of the big heads of a seven-headed dragon," Khamenei said. "The brains directing it are Zionist and non-Zionist capitalists who brought Bush to power to meet their own interests."

I love you too Khammy.

/Where do we have the other SIX heads ? I feel we need them NOW.

368 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:26:59am

RE American Task Force

I wonder who they are and who funds them.

They at least mention as one of the challenges to peace "Violence Against Civilians" ...but they completely ignore the fact that Israel is left with the option of taking harsh actions such as occupying the area in order to provide safety for its citizens and building a safety barrier...in REACTION to the violence against civilians.

but yeah, generally 42 pages of BS

369 Cavy  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:27:26am

SNIFF ... SNIFF ... Okay ... who let the AIRHEAD in? (#9 jscorse )

Dude ... before you start citing "references" (like those I've seen from you so far ... "NY Times" HaHa) you need to check out the "BIAS' situation in the Media ... once you have done your FACT CHECKING and found out where to get the straight story ... ANNND ... read the links associated with this post (Charles put them there for a reason) ... you may want to reconsider that stupid idea that Eason "Raises some valid points" (or some such horse shit) The Asshole is an F'n FRAUD of a "journalist" and ANYONE who see's even the slightest validity in his drivel is ... A F'N AIRHEAD ...

370 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:27:57am

900 Palestinian Prisoners to Gain Freedom

The Jericho withdrawal could take place before the summit, but approval was largely window-dressing. Jericho has been quiet during the fighting, and troops have moved into the town only a few times to make arrests.

"Window-dressing"? Fine, we'll keep the land then.

The Palestinians want the towns handed over in one blow.

Yeah, nothing is ever enough, or good enough, for them.

The participants in Thursday's meeting said the military would also remove some West Bank roadblocks and open the Karni cargo crossing between Gaza and Israel. Karni, Gaza's lifeline, was closed last month after militants killed six Israelis.

Israel will never learn. Gaza's lifeline cut off -- boo-hoo. Because six Israelis were murdered -- nothing, silence.

Israel has killed dozens of wanted Palestinian men in targeted assassinations that have elicited international criticism.

Whereas suicide bombings that mass-murder Israeli women and children are met with stony silence.

The Palestinians want Israel to grant amnesty to all fugitives.

The Palestinians want, want, want, but never put forward what they're prepared to do in order to achieve their goals. They're so used to being treated like spoiled, over-indulged two-year olds that they don't know how to behave like responsible adults.

The ministers also gave the go-ahead for construction to begin on a seaport in Gaza, which would stimulate a Palestinian economy hurt by the fighting.

No one cares about how badly the Israeli economy is hurting because of the terrorism.

In violence in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian militants ambushed an Israeli army vehicle, slightly wounding two soldiers with grenades and gunfire before the army returned fire and killed one of the militants, military officials said.

But that's fine and any violence coming from the Palestinians shouldn't get in the way of giving them whatever they want, the darlings of the international community.

I hate the media, I hate the hypocrisy, it literally makes me sick to the stomach.

371 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:29:20am

TalkinKamel (#357)

I do think Charles getting profiled might be one of the things that set the Nodrog off today. . .

Definitely. He's insanely jealous of Charles.

372 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:29:53am

#368 pilgrim shadow

I wonder who they are and who funds them.

See [Link: www.americantaskforce.org...]

373 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:30:05am

@341 MrPol

Yup, same ol' broken record. :(

@343 mitzblitz

Same ol' song, different verse.

@348 Talkin Kamel

If he isn't Nodrog, he's his twin. :)

@352 RebTex

Dangit! I'm sure glad I wasn't drinking when I read about
the frogs ass! *LOL

374 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:30:24am

#354 pilgrim shadow

Oh jeez. Their "solution" is for Israel to withdraw behind the 1949 armistice lines and surrender "Arab" "East" Jerusalem. Not even Chimpy McDeathwhore endorses that lunacy.

Those people are hopeless. Actually, scratch that. They are malevolent.

375 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:33:09am

#370 zulubaby

I hate the media, I hate the hypocrisy, it literally makes me sick to the stomach.

Zulubaby, I couldn't have said it better.

376 3 wood  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:34:15am

#346 cathyf

I understand what you mean and usually I would also give this situation an innocent construction due to being "soft hearted" (some would say soft headed) myself. However, I am reminded that this Jordan is the same sleaze that admitted that he knew about various attrocities taking place in Iraq during the 90's but did not report them. Remember that he admitted to knowing about a 31 year old Kuwati woman named Asrar Qabani (I think that is spelled correctly) who was kidnapped in 1990 tortured and brutally murdered/butchered in 1991 by Sadaam's henchmen, yet he reported none of this. Thus he lost any benefit of the doubt from me and I see him as a pathetic character who's word is not trustworthy.

This is not meant to put down your thoughts, only to mention another aspect you might not be familiar with :-).

377 Yehudit  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:35:34am

Check out Jay Nordlinger at Davos.

Jordan is on a panel concerning democracy and the media. It is moderated by David Gergen. I am not present, but people I know are, and they fill me in. Also, one may read an account of this incident on the WEF blog, here. In addition, one may read an account at OpinionJournal.com's Political Diary (subscription required).

Apparently, Eason Jordan states — or implies (on this, I am not quite clear) — that the U.S. military is targeting journalists for murder in Iraq. Yes, you read that right. Barney Frank — as it is told to me — goes nuts: What? Whoa, whoa, whoa. You've reported this story, right? It is a momentous deal. Jordan starts to backpedal, realizing that he has gone too far, with this audience. (Not for the first time, incidentally, does Barney Frank show some cojones in Davos — see, for example, my Part I, which touches on Frank, China, and Taiwan.) Gergen, the moderator, is nonplussed at what Jordan has done.

Afterward — again, as it is reported to me — Jordan is surrounded by Arab attendees, who congratulate him on having the "courage" to speak the hard truth. Jordan accepts those congratulations.

To repeat: I am absent from this session, but I have no reason to doubt the testimony I hear. And one can consult the WEF blog and the Journal, measuring those accounts. As for Jordan's performance, I suppose I should provide commentary, but what can one say?

378 papijoe  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:35:55am

testing

379 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:36:52am

Let me get this straight.

Charles makes a sweeping, 100% fact statement that the MSM is DELIBERATELY ignoring this story.

I point out that Charles has no proof.

And now I'M supposed to come up with the proof?

I'm not the one that made the assertion.

For Zulubaby it's apartho-logic. For all of LGF it's illogic. And for Quark2, it's just spiteful, wilful stupidity.

380 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:36:56am

#370 zulu

New Pali regime = Old Pali regime

Pretend negotiations for the world to see...claim they are one-sided until you get EVERYTHING...and keep the conflict going because it is what helps you keep a grip on the society.

I hope and pray that peaceful negotiations can happen...but I fear Israel will eventually have to call the Orkin man...its just a matter of time.

The problem is...this 'journalist' is using the term 'militants' to describe a mindset that is the same mindset of MOST Palestinians. They (the MSM) live in a state of denial.

381 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:37:58am

#293 Sarah D.

Things are getting really scarey out here in Jesusland! Fanatical Christian right-wingers are following our cowboy president's Darth Vaderesque lead, and are banning nipples, on both men and women! Nipples aren't mentioned in the Bible (I don't think), so naturally they want to get rid of them.

Not content with banning secondary sex-characteristics, President Chimp-Hitler is going to ban the 60's! That's right, no more peace, no more love! No more re-distributing the wealth to the oppressed masses, or feeling sorry for poor people! No more of those lovely, liberating drugs, that helped make me the creative free-spirit and insightful writer that I am today!

He's going to ban the 30's too, and that wonderful New Deal, and Roosevelt! Rumsfeld and Condi are building him a time machine, so he can go back and change the world, so that the 60's never happened! No psychodelics! No Timothy Leary! No, "Love American Style!" Just boring Jesusland conformity and T.V. dinners! And right-wing Christians, banning nipples, and building anti-evolution museums! Only Mekong man can save us now!

/Channeling the lovely and talented Mo Dowdy, hysteric extraordinaire.

/Read the link on Sarah D.'s post #293. I'm satirizing her, people, BUT NOT THAT MUCH!

/First WriterMom channels Nodrog, then I channel Modo! What a day!

/Maybe Modo and Nodrog should date?

382 jfromfolsomca  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:38:18am

This guy is such a winey prick.

j

383 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:38:58am

#203 jwpaine

It is my firm (and horrified) belief that Hillary Clinton will be our next President.

I agree, but I'm fairly sure she will be an OTB (One-Term Bubbette). After Hillary, it will be Dr. Rice, or Joe Lieberman as a Republican.

Either that or the First Caliph of Washington.

384 BPP  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:39:32am

370 zulubaby

The ministers also gave the go-ahead for construction to begin on a seaport in Gaza, which would stimulate a Palestinian economy hurt by the fighting.

Why is this not more controversial? Who here doesn't think that that seaport will become the major smuggling route for heavy weapons?

385 redstateredneck  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:40:43am

#376 3 Wood

admitted that he knew about various attrocities taking place in Iraq during the 90's but did not report them


Yep, that nailed it for me. I used to ocasionally watch CNN - hell, I knew it was biased, but WTF, but when that came out, I swore, never again. With FNC, talk radio & the internet, who the hell needs 'em?

386 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:40:51am

#355 Athos: Have you ever thought that perhaps other MSM editors aren't running the story because it really ISN'T newsworthy?

Some lame-o CNN guy goes off half-cocked at a world event, apparently unrecorded.

If Zulubaby or Quark2 got up at a podium and claimed U.S. troops had targeted reporters in Iraq I wouldn't expect the MSM to report it either.

387 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:40:59am

Having spent the past hour or so watching the Oil for Food news conference unfold, I didn't have a chance to read Mr. CNN's "explanation".

Having just done so all I can say is that it is the most incoherent bit of gibberish I have seen in a long time, possibly since Kerry's campaign ended.

Ostensibly, every sentence is a contradiction of the preceding sentence.

388 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:41:43am

#379 nodroG

A news organization that has the story, because it's about itself, choses not to run it, and that is not deliberate? What, they accidentally made a choice?

389 eeevil conservative  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:42:06am

#378 papijoe

everything okay?

390 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:42:06am

@379 Nodrog


Here you go...maybe this'll make you happy.


Chimp, chimp,chimp,chimp

And I don't have to provide any willful or spiteful stupidity.
You do that every time you post here.

391 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:43:12am

#379 Gordon

For the answer to your question, see #386 Gordon.

392 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:43:25am

Perhaps the resident idiot could prove that there isn't an invisible elf hiding under his chair.

393 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:44:19am

#386 Nodrog,

executive vice president and chief
news executive of CNN


is hardly a "nobody"...

if the guy knows we are murdering his people he should have the balls to tell the hard truth and protect his bottomfeeders no?


btw) LOVE ME DADDY!

Charles why didn't you mention I, NoDrog as the "guiding light"?

/moonbat off

394 Bunker Buster  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:44:36am

It's no use trying to argue with nodroG. Reason, logic and the cold hard facts simply have no currency with him. My humble suggestion is don't feed the troll.

395 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:44:40am

#346 3 wood

You're right. Jordan's knuckling under to Saddam's regime, and hiding so many horrible atrocities, pretty much destroys the credibility of anything he says.

396 jfromfolsomca  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:44:59am

Just wondering that if any journalists were actually killed while in Iraq, was it because they were standing in the middle of the terrists. They seem to have lots of photos of terrists shooting off weapons.

j

397 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:45:09am

#386 nodroG

A major news organization claims the US is deliberately targeting journalists, and that's not newsworthy?

Not that it changes anything - the decision that it's not newsworthy is pretty deliberate - meaning they deliberately ignored the story.

398 Bunker Buster  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:45:50am

They were probably reloading mags for the terrorists.

399 papijoe  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:45:52am

#389 eeevil conservative

Yup. If the network commandos don't come crashing in through the skylight in the first 90 seconds, I'm good to go...

Or was that the first 90 minutes...?

400 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:45:59am

#370 Zulubaby:

About the Palestinians:

Yeah, nothing is ever enough, or good enough, for them.

Meanwhile, earlier in the same post:

"Window-dressing"? Fine, we'll keep the land then

This is beginning to sound less about those awful Palestinians and more about Messianic dreams of Eretz Israel. Nothing is ever enough for Jewish extremists either.

Or, "they may be religious fundamentalist crazies, but they're OUR religious fundamentalist crazies!"

401 jemima  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:46:19am

I apologize if this tidbit has been riden into the ground but last I heard Eason Jordan was "dating" Danny Pearl's widow. Was Danny Pearl targeted by the US military or was it some freedom fighters? Just asking.

402 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:47:04am

#400 nodroG

Still racist after all this years...

403 bbcrackmonkey  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:47:08am

I just registered at DailyKos for the first time so I could post comments. The reason I did so was because he's using blatantly false statistics about the Iraqi election, saying that only 40% of eligible Iraqis voted when it was over 50%, and he's basing this on a fake statistic on the average age of Iraqis which can easily be refuted by a quick glance at the CIA World Factbook.

404 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:47:23am

#386 nogroG

Last time I checked zulubaby and Quark2 are not the head of an international *ahem* 'news' organization. When you spout nonsense, it is not newsworthy either.

405 Thom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:47:52am

Charles, can't you just ban it for pity's sake?

406 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:48:01am

PIMF - nodroG...

407 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:48:23am

#405 Thom

I second that.

408 Gordon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:48:43am

#388 Mr. Pol: Your argument certainly applies to CNN. But, last time I checked, CNN was a small part of the MSM mega-machine.

Charles said THE WHOLE MSM was DELIBERATELY ignoring the story. Without any factual backup apparently, since he is too cowardly to provide the proof, or admit it doesn't exist.

409 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:48:44am

@386 Nodrog

If Zulubaby or Quark2 got up at a podium and claimed U.S. troops had targeted reporters in Iraq I wouldn't expect the MSM to report it either.

Oh thank you for putting my name in the same sentence as zulubabys! I didn't know you cared so much.

/sarc


You are so compacted with shi'ite Gordon your eyes aren't brown anymore, they're black from the old shi'ite being compacted by the overrun of the new shi'ite.
Maybe it's time Charles took you in for your annual rabie shot.

410 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:48:45am

#394 Bunker Buster

My humble suggestion is don't feed the troll.


I second that motion, especially seeing as the troll is unwittingly answering his/her own queries in subsequent posts.

411 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:50:16am

#408 Gordon

Your argument certainly applies to CNN. But, last time I checked, CNN was a small part of the MSM mega-machine.

Yeah, and journalists don't talk to each others, and only CNN reads blogs.

Charles said THE WHOLE MSM was DELIBERATELY ignoring the story.

Deliberaterly = by choice. Are you arguing that no other news organization heard about this story?

412 bbcrackmonkey  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:50:31am

Gordon, this story is indeed very newsworthy. The same guy who admittedly covered up Saddam's atrocities, a major executive at CNN, is accusing US soldiers of deliberately murdering journalists. How you cannot see the newsworthiness of this escapes me.

413 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:51:30am

Why is he here?

414 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:52:23am

Sorry für OT, but I can´t resist ;-))

A little boy goes to his dad and asks, "What is Politics?"

Dad says, "Well son, let me try to explain it this way:

I am the head of the family, so call me The President.

Your mother is the administrator of the money, so we call her The Government.

We are here to take care of your needs, so we will call you The People.

The nanny, we will consider her The Working Class.

And! your baby brother, we will call him The Future.

Now think about that and see if it makes sense.

So the little boy goes off to bed thinking about what Dad has said. Later that night, he hears his baby brother crying, so he gets up to check on him. He finds that the baby has severely soiled his diaper. So the little boy goes to his parent's room and finds his mother sound ! asleep.

Not wanting to wake her, he goes to the nanny's room.

Finding the door locked, he peeks in the keyhole and sees his father in bed with the nanny. He gives up and goes back to bed.

The next morning, the little boy say's to his father, "Dad, I think I understand the concept of politics now,"

The father says, "Great son! Tell me in your own words what you think politics is all about."

The little boy replies, "The President is screwing The Working Class while The Government is sound asleep. The People are being ignored and The Future is in deep shit ."

415 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:52:57am

#293 Sarah D.

. . . By "Mekong Man", of course, I mean John Kerry, the real president of the country (not that cowboy Darth Vader). We can only hope that, in the country's hour of need, he will come blasting out of the jungles of Vietnam, killing all those right-wing Christian nipple-stealers, just like he killed all those Vietcong, and just like he fought the Khmer Rouge (wait---didn't he say he was running guns for them? I get confused. . . )

But, anyway, he'll kill off all right-wing Christians and those who want to renounce the New Deal. He'll have this big lightsabre fight with Rumsfield, and Rumsfield will fall into this big tunnel and blow up, just like the evil Emperor in "Star Wars." Kerry will bring back the 60's, and every vote will be counted! I like his nipples, too! (Thereza has nipples too, of course, but they're not as nice as his---or mine! If only men would date smart, independent women like me, they'd see that our nipples are just as nice as the ones on those stupid little secretaries and caretakers and mommy-types they always insist on marrying!)

/Channeling Mo Dowdy again---and I'm going to go hit myself over the head with a hammer, to make it stop!

416 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:53:08am

#413 pilgrim shadow

Why is he here?

To disrupt threads. And to piss us off.

417 pookleblinky  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:53:11am

Someone brought up bugmenot.com on this or an earlier thread. Does anyone know if the nodrog is the bugmenot registration nic?

I have too much respect for Charles to even right-click on the account-name.

418 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:53:51am

Shut up, Gordon. Nobody cares what you think.

419 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:54:44am

#418 zulubaby

You call that 'thinking'?

420 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:55:23am

@400 Nodrog

This is beginning to sound less about those awful Palestinians and more about Messianic dreams of Eretz Israel. Nothing is ever enough for Jewish extremists either.


You are one sick POS.
The Israelis give and give...you name ONE damned thing the [bigoted word]s have given.


I'm waiting...

/crickets

421 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:56:04am

#482 Mr. Pol

(sigh) What can you expect? I'm pretty sure Nodrog is an Islamophile.

(Off to hit my head with a hammer; "BE GONE, MAUREEN, BE GONE!")

422 jfromfolsomca  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:56:48am

#403 - bbcrackmonkey

You are brave. I occasionally check out that site and have come to the conclusion that you can't reason with that group or have a real debate. If anyone disagrees or puts forth a more moderate opinion, the hate starts flying.

j

423 eeevil conservative  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:57:14am

papijoe

LOL!

424 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:57:25am

#386 Gordon

Have you ever thought that perhaps other MSM editors aren't running the story because it really ISN'T newsworthy?

Let's see -it's not newsworthy that the Chief News Executive of CNN accuses the US Military of not only deliberately targeting journalists (their employees) for assassination, but also of torturing them? Is that what you are saying? That's about as newsworthy as putting panties on the head of a terrorist in Abu Ghraib, right.

Nor would they pass on an opportunity to support Jordan if he is right - it embarasses the US Military (a favorite target), and it would embarass the bloggers who brought down Dan Rather if they prove Jordan either right or that he never really said that. Again, a reason to cover the story.

Finally, the 3rd option, they can't let Jordan go the way of Rather and have the bloggers win again, so they stonewall, and hope the story whithers on the vine.

This is a story...one that Jordan and the MSM want to disappear.

Oh, BTW, the isn't some lame-o CNN guy. It's their freaking boss - the CHIEF NEWS EXECUTIVE of the NETWORK. He was on the freaking panel at Davos - it's not the place where just any lame-o is invited to participate. SHEESH!

425 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:57:34am

More French weirdness.

The article's kind of hard to follow, but sounds like this guy is likely a serious slimeball. Funny thing is that French students suddenly seem to have found something to get upset about when this right-wing guy might be doing some Holocaust denial. But the blatant (and often violent) anti-Semitism spewing from the left and from Muslims? Couldn't care less. It's all about politics and power.

426 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:58:14am
427 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 10:59:52am

#417 pookleblinky

No username/password on bugmenot.com for LGF...I am sure if Charles found one being used he would cut it off at the knees;-)

I am afraid the el gordo is a living breathing troll...

428 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:00:05am

#403 bbcrackmonkey
#422 jfromfolsomca

It can nevertheless be very educational to have alook around there, from a purely sociological point of view.
The thread on Hillary falling ill is one of the most instructive I've yet seen.

429 lagartija  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:00:21am

#408 nodroG

Rest your hands and face!

430 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:01:02am

#427 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU

See [Link: www.bugmenot.com...]

431 Model4  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:01:31am

TalkinKamel: Your posts always make me smile!

432 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:01:40am

#383 Who Watches the Watchmen?

Thanks for the nod. I was beginning to think I'd either:


1. Made an argument the illogic of which everyone was too polite to mention (like that time I walked around the office for an hour with toilet paper stuck to my shoe);

2. Violated some unwritten LGF law about OT posts having a specific wordcount, meter, and rhyming scheme;

3. Just woke up and smelled coffee old-timer LGFers have been drinking a long time.

BTW: In regard to a previous OT I posted here regarding the lack of big media attention to SuperHero Kerry's self-proclaimed delivery of weapons to the Khmer Rouge, James Taranto on his Best of the Web (just below the middle of the page) notes that he has changed his recurring description of John Kerry as
"The haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat, who by the way served in Vietnam"
to
"The haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat, who by the way delivered weapons to the Khmer Rouge."

Well, it's a start.

433 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:01:41am

Mr Pol, more like drool really.

Gordon, I'd be proud to count quark2 amongst my friends, thanks. Piss off, you racist asshole.

434 hurricane_jimmy  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:01:57am

Off Topic:

Anybody else take notice of Chris Matthews cynical comments regarding the embrace between Mrs. Norwood and the Iraqi woman who voted in the election. Seems the Lardball host was convinced it was completely staged for dramatic effect only. Scarborough seemed surprised by Matthews comment. Norah O'Donnell immediately responsed with "I don't think so, but who cares anyway?"

435 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:02:45am

#430 Mr Pol

Did the same thing 12 minutes ago...no login.. Either I can't type (a great possibility!) or it is new...

IC

436 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:03:54am
437 Eagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:06:02am

OT:
Question for y'all about this Oil for Food programme:

CNN just released this. I am not sure if this is finally starting to break out in the MSM. But following CNN for the past couple days, they have been showing this article claiming that the US knew about the smuggling all along.

Conspicuously absent (at least to me) is that the 2nd article doesn't state when the US knew of the scandal. Considering the timeline, I would guess it occurred on Clinton's watch.

Now for the question: Am I missing some part of this story, or is CNN almost downplaying the UN's part in this, and trying to shift attention to the "US involvement"?

438 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:07:19am

#437 Eagle

You're not missing anything.

439 eeevil conservative  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:07:38am

CNN is a joke.

440 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:07:47am

#436 song_and_dance_man

Any act of ignoring is by definition deliberate.

There really is no point engaging the troll, you might as well watch Jerry Springer.

441 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:08:47am

#408 nodroG

Where is the story on CNN? ABC? CBS? NBC? NY Times? Boston Globe? WaTimes? Newsday? USA Today? NY Daily News? NY Post? LA Times? Chicago Tribune? Philadelphia Inquirier? SF Chronicle? Seattle PI? MSNBC? FNC (other than a brief Brit Hume mention)? BBC? CBC? WSJ beyond the Political Report?

Come on, show one major outpost of the MSM running this - either to hammer Jordan as the blogsphere does, or to defend Jordan and counterattack the blogosphere.

This is the EXACT same scenario as with Rathergate - except with Rathergate, on day 2 or 3, Howard Kurtz of WaPost jumped in and started the MSM feeding frenzy on the wounded shark guppy Rather.

BTW - You aren't going to deflect THIS issue from the irresponsible, inaccurate, pandering statements of Eason Jordan to an issue on Charles' use of ONE EFFIN WORD. You ain't that good.

The issue isn't Charles - the issues are Jordan, his history of irresponsible judgment / statements and the MSM covering for him. (Well, it also is a little about how pathetic you - are you sure you aren't Eason Jordan?)

442 will_not_back_down  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:08:49am

Is everybody reading this from Rony Abovitz?

Response from Rony Abovitz?

And Mckinnon?
Mckinnon?

443 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:09:08am

#426 song_and_dance_man 2/3/2005 12:58PM PST

I got the joke via e-mail from a friend in the USA. No copy right *gg*

444 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:09:45am

bbcrackmonkey

How you cannot see the newsworthiness of this escapes me.

He only sees what he wants to believe.

445 Roger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:10:15am

#408 Gordon, you just used the coward word, punk. There is no one lower on the coward scale than you. Never have you ever answered well delivered arguments refuting your drivel. Repeatedly on many threads. Scram, punk.

446 Rancher  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:11:01am

The fact that this is all over the blogosphere proves it’s newsworthy. The demand is out there and Blogs are filling that demand. If the MSM refuses to cover something and the Blogosphere does then that is just another nail in it’s coffin.

447 CalipHater  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:11:29am

Charles,

Need more posts, life force fading -- must... stay... strong... & avoid... cyber... stalking... {collapse}

448 ted  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:11:58am

I LOGGED TO THE LATEST CURRENT THREAD SCROLL DOWN AND THE POST I SEE IS GORDON

JEEZ

449 Sarah D.  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:12:26am

#381 TalkinKamel

/Maybe Modo and Nodrog should date?

Dowd hates men, so that would work out perfectly!

450 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:12:28am

#442 will_not_back_down

Abovitz is trying to obfuscate the issue - kinda like the nodroG, but better. McKinnon is being honest, especially when she says "I don't feel that I'm in a position to speak objectively on this issue."

451 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:13:55am

#400 nodroG

This is beginning to sound less about those awful Palestinians and more about Messianic dreams of Eretz Israel. Nothing is ever enough for Jewish extremists either.

That statement is

a. ignorant
b. morally bankrupt
c. intellectually bankrupt
d. nearly the legal defintion of fighting words.
e. All of the Above

452 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:15:30am

#437 Eagle

IMHO the most fascinating aspect is not the report but Volcker's evasive performance during the news conference.

For instance he was asked whether he would disclose his own financial details so as to prove that he has no conflict of interest.

His answer: "It is beyond me how that might be relevant."

Obviously there was no follow up question from our MSM friends.

453 eeevil conservative  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:15:43am

Sarah D.

Dowd hates men, so that would work out perfectly!

DANG, I LOVE YOU!

454 Sean  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:16:54am
You're so schooled in Apartho-logic!

I nominate Nodrog(#200) for the rotating titles!

455 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:18:15am

#449 Sarah D.

ROTFLMAO! :-0

456 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:19:28am
457 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:20:13am

Troll feeding frenzy! Hey gordon guess what I am? (channeling John Belushi).

458 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:20:18am

Sarah D., LOL!

459 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:20:32am

#456 song_and_dance_man

Then why are you selling it?

He needs the money?

460 will_not_back_down  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:20:42am

#450 Mr Pol

Im writing my response now to what Ron posted for my take on that. Eason pack pedaling in a nut shell is worth it's weight in gold.

More to point though, Ron's chose not to take a side with the media or the blogsphere, he's stuck in the middle, (insert irony here), what I got out in a nutshell bare bones was: dont start sh#t and there wont be sh#t.

461 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:22:00am
462 W-lover  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:22:27am

eeevil-

I thought about you last night when I saw those inked fingers!

463 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:23:32am

#456 song_and_dance_man

Then why are you selling it?


$$$.

The question should be how he got it in the first place.

464 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:23:34am

#460 will_not_back_down

Ron is trying to 'enlarge' the debate... add enough noise and the signal is drowned. McKinnon's post says "I owe the bastard a favor, so I'm going to shut up." Interesting, huh? If she felt defending him was the moral thing to do, would she shut up?

465 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:24:39am

#460 will_not_back_down

Like it or not (and I don't like it), it is an historical document, and selling it doesn't mean anything. Whoever buys it, on the other hand, is fair game.

466 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:24:45am
Abovitz is trying to obfuscate the issue - kinda like the nodroG, but better. McKinnon is being honest, especially when she says "I don't feel that I'm in a position to speak objectively on this issue."

With all due respect to Mrs. McKinnon, objectivity is not required, evidence is. If Mr. Jordan has credible evidence to back up has allegation let him present it. He has not (at least to my knowledge) presented any. He certainly didn't present any when pressed on the issue by Barney Frank.

People that nasty sore on the roof of LGF's mouth will never heal as long as you keep tonguing it.

/Veiled reference to you-know-who

467 EW1(SG)  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:25:29am

#454 Sean:

I nominate Nodrog(#200) for the rotating titles!

I might second your nomination as it is a most ludricrous statement, but I won't because of the sheer venom and hatred directed at a lovely woman. Better his name be obliterated from memory.

468 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:25:32am

#466 Dirk Diggler

See #464.

469 W-lover  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:26:48am

Eagle-

Senator Norm Coleman told me that the MSM was going to be paying more attention to this scandal. I guess he was right.

470 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:28:41am
471 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:29:03am

#469, they can afford to now as it can't damage Jungle John.

I think the majority of the MSM sat on it as they instinctively knew that Jungle John would lose his luster if the depths of UN corruption were known as would all internationalists.

Witness TurnerChannel spinning it as a US matter.

472 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:29:26am

OT - Time to take a poll - from Michael Totten's site

Oh, and nodrog, the correct answer for the multiple choice question above is E.

473 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:30:03am

Sean (#454)

I nominate Nodrog(#200) for the rotating titles!

It's a pretty vicious comment and I don't believe I'd like to see a reference to Apartheid on the rotating titles.

474 zulubaby  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:31:06am

EW1(SG), ah, thanks! :-)

475 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:31:59am
476 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:33:22am
McKinnon's post says "I owe the bastard a favor, so I'm going to shut up." Interesting, huh? If she felt defending him was the moral thing to do, would she shut up?

My guess is Ms. McKinnon, though she undoubtedly respects Eason Jordan, probably also knows how flakey he can be. Why jeopardize her credibility and reputation?

477 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:33:54am
478 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:35:11am

#464 Mr Pol

Good point.
Its not always the case that inferences can be drawn from silence. Here it is.

479 Mr Pol  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:35:46am

#476 Dirk Diggler

Having the reputation of not returning favors is not very good either. Nah, by being 'honest' she's being smart.

480 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:36:11am

Anybody else wondering when Charles is gonna notice that his captive audience is (as we used to say in the Navy) "Milling about smartly" on this well-chewed thread and post a new one?

I mean, I can watch Gordon get smacked around for hours, but that's just me. I'm just thinking of others. I'm a sharing, caring kind of guy.

481 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:36:37am
482 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:37:21am

#475 song_and_dance_man

Notice this section in particular:

Consider the Power Line blog, cofounded by Hinderaker. Last year, it helped set off the mass debunking of CBS's supposed memos about President Bush's National Guard service. Marshall's Talking Points Memo site, meanwhile, is a must-read among the Democratic elite.


Evidently, Marshall is making a very valuable contribution.
/

483 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:38:02am
484 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:38:23am

#480 jwpaine

I second that motion.
Oil for Food!

485 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:40:02am
486 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:41:55am

#437 Eagle 2/3/2005 01:06PM PST

I dont´know why CNN (Spiegel magazine in Germany is also reporting on the story) reports these old and well known facts.

The scandal about the oil-for-food-program is NOT about smuggeling oil, it is about bribes and corruption, oil vauchers for being on Saddams side and so on...

Iraq watch 2000

487 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:41:56am

@460 Dirk Drggler


People that nasty sore on the roof of LGF's mouth will never heal as long as you keep tonguing it.

Amen.

488 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:42:48am

Someday when an MSM organ runs a piece on LGF or Charles, I'll bet that that NodroG will be right there as "balance". It's what he's after.

489 quark2  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:46:53am

@480 jwpaine

I mean, I can watch Gordon get smacked around for hours, but that's just me. I'm just thinking of others. I'm a sharing, caring kind of guy.


*LMAO!

Yeah my copy of this thread is getting real dog eared. It's beginning to look like my pups have gotten a hold of it and drug it around on the floor. :)

490 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:46:58am

#486 zuckerlilly

The scandal about the oil-for-food-program is NOT about smuggeling oil, it is about bribes and corruption, oil vauchers for being on Saddams side and so on...

True, however, after having seen him in action for the first time earlier today, I think the biggest scandal to date is the fact that Paul Volcker is the person looking into it.

A tale involving a fox and a hen house come to mind.

491 BIG  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:49:33am

#475 song_and_dance_man

Are bloggers journalists? Do they deserve press protections?

No we are not. Bloggers have a shred of integrity.

492 Sarah D.  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:50:30am

Fair and Balanced? I don't think so...

"I think Jeff's questions suggest he has a pretty strong partisan bent that is at odds with the mission of White House correspondents who go to those meetings on behalf of the public," said Bob Deans, who has covered the White House for seven years for Cox Newspapers. "That is not the point of White House briefings."

-snip

"The story isn't me, the story is that it doesn't seem that there is room for a single conservative in the White House press corps," he added.

The problem is that partisan reporting is fine, as long as it's liberal.

493 BPP  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:50:48am

397 Mr Pol

A major news organization claims the US is deliberately targeting journalists, and that's not newsworthy?

Apparently not. I did a quick Google search and the only references to this story seem to be in the blogosphere.
Is this a case of the MSM circling the wagons? Seems unlikely. Wouldn't you think Fox News would have a field day with something like this?

So how come no coverage? I'm guessing that's because verbal gaffes at a private function by anyone other than a politician are never covered in the news.

At least I think that's right. Any counterexamples you can think of?

494 Peacekeeper  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:52:03am

NPR just had a "review" of the SOTUS by their theater critic, just openly hostile hackwork. Of course they're not biased.

495 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:52:34am

Btw, does anyone know whether Kofi was entitled to see an advance version of the Oil for Food report?

It might be important if he wasn't since, during his smug performance in yesterday's news conference, Kofi slipped up a few times, effectively admitting that he had already read the report.

496 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:53:55am
497 Dave the.....  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:54:05am

Could be FOX wants to be very sure before they take off on this. If they run stories and commentary on it and things turn out not to be quite true (seems unlikely now), that would be a big blow since it's about a competitore.


If MSM does cover it, look for the accusers to be attacked (aka SBVT).

498 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:57:13am

#491 BIG

#475 song_and_dance_man

Are bloggers journalists? Do they deserve press protections?

No we are not. Bloggers have a shred of integrity.


Wrong, well, at least the first sentence is.
It all depends on whether one is talking about journalists or "journalists".

499 Eagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 11:59:45am

#486 Zuckerlilly

Couldn't agree more. Thanks for the link though. Just what I've been lookig for.

But I put myself in the mindset of (seemingly) many people around me. Someone who just follows Cnn will likley see this as a "US thing" and start screaming Haliburton. Kinda itches me ya know?

#480 jwpaine
#486 hm

That scene from Return of the Jedi comes to mind. An officer asks why the imperial forces are not attacking the rebels (who are themselves after the 2nd death star). Admiral says something like:
I have orders from the Emperor himself. He has something special planned.

So here we are waiting impatiently for the next topic.

500 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:00:13pm

#496 song_and_dance_man

The UN cannot be trusted?


Now now, if you had listened to what Paul Volcker had to say, you'd would refrain from asking such a cynical question.
Of course it can be trusted.
/

501 Firebreather  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:00:41pm

CNN...a complete dung heap.

502 Beagle  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:00:52pm

Oil-for-Food

I've been reading the report since it came out. Sevan's relationship to African Middle East Petroleum is damning.

I owe Volcker an apology. This preliminary report (PDF) is far from a whitewash.

The selection of BNP, auditing, and UN procedures all come under intense scrutiny. The forthcoming reports should be very interesting.

503 sven10077  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:01:05pm

TKS at NRO has this on EAson:

SOME MINOR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EASON JORDAN STORY [02/03 04:26 PM]

No word from CNN or Barney Frank's office yet.

I am informed by a friend that at least one major right-of-center newspaper will be writing an editorial about Eason Jordan's comments for tomorrow's edition.

Steve Sturm is raising questions about Jordan's math.

[Link: www.nationalreview.com...]

504 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:01:48pm

So is everybody reading the Volcker report? I just downloaded the pdf from FoxNews. Two-hundred-forty-six pages.

505 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:03:35pm
Wouldn't you think Fox News would have a field day with something like this?

They may be totally unaware of the comments. The first place I heard of them was right here on LFG.

506 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:03:56pm
507 Powderfinger  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:04:47pm

#493 BPP

I'm guessing that's because verbal gaffes at a private function by anyone other than a politician are never covered in the news.

The World Economic Forum is not a private function.

You're very generous in your assesment of Jordan's remarks as a gaffe. Do you think he makes a lot of those? He seems to. Or, maybe it's something else.

508 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:05:45pm

#499 Eagle


So here we are waiting impatiently for the next topic.


Indeed we are.

Unfortuntely, however, since a previous engagement will keep me from hanging around here for much longer, will you all make sure to mention that Paul Volcker in an asswipe, if and when the pertinent thread is opened.

509 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:05:46pm

No, no and no, the UN cannot be trusted:

Don't Let Volcker Report Whitewash U.N. Oil-For-Food Scandal, Analyst Says

To that end, Gardiner proposes:

-Bringing transparency to the IIC’s operations. Identify all 60 people working on or with the committee, complete with all of their prior affiliations.

-Publicly disclosing all interviews between the IIC and U.N. officials and all findings from the committee.

-Furnishing monthly updates on IIC activities and progress to Security Council members.

-Setting and honoring a date for publication of the final IIC report to remove the timing of its release from U.N. political manipulation.

-Forcing the U.N. to make all of its personnel who were involved in the Oil-For-Food program, as well as all relevant documents, available to the various committees of the U.S. Congress that have opened investigations.

510 hm  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:07:47pm

#502 Beagle

The report might not be, but Volcker's press conference certainly was.

511 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:12:19pm

@506 song and dance


Bloggers are more like leaders who get up on the soapbox, giving information that many agree with, and, by virtue of the medium, consolidate the opinion that was already present in the readers.

Well put.


@509 zuckerlilly 2/3/2005 02:05PM PST
Do you really live in a world where you think the Oil For Food Scandal will be fully investigated...and that if it really IS investigated, that information would be divulged to the American public? There is no Freedom of Information act for the UN.

512 mich-again  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:12:36pm

I find it funny that ALL the left wing blogs are now posting that banner ad "FACT:.." that tells the story of how great the UN's "crude for food" program was and try to explain away the negative reporting as partisan right wing spin. The ad even goes as far to blame the program's shortcomings on...who else? GWB and his administration. The target audience for the ad is their cheering section. Whats the point?

I'm guessing that Kos, DU and all the other Left Wing Nut Job blogs are getting paid to show the ad from the UN's PR budget, a good portion of which came from our UN contribution.

513 Malleus Dei  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:14:31pm

The UN is corrupt and cannot be trusted.

514 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:15:19pm
515 Ex_dem  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:21:22pm

Too many comments to read them all, so apologies if these points have been made before.

This is the first time I have heard anyone say that journalists were "indeed targeted" to be killed by anyone.

But no one doubts that journalists have been specifically targeted in Iraq; the "insurgents" have targeted and killed several of them.

Good luck finding any mention of this story in mainstream news. It’s being deliberately ignored.

I would wait another day or two before making such a judgment. Howard Kurtz said he was looking into it. A good journalist isn't going to write a "he-said-he-said" article; a good journalist is going to try to find the tape, and that could take a few days.

516 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:21:52pm

#511 pilgrim shadow 2/3/2005 02:12PM PST

Seriously? ;-)) No, I´m a realist, but I think we here can do a lot, that the UN cannot escape with these lies and blame the USA.

Many Iraqis suffered because of this UN-scandal.

517 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:23:19pm
518 sonofsheldon  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:25:10pm

Eason Jordan; a clear case of talking out of two sides of his mouth, and lying out of both of them.

519 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:25:21pm

#516 zuckerlilly

I guess I'm a pessimist...but I think its time for us to pull out of the UN completely.

520 3 wood  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:27:53pm

#395 TalkinKammel

Thank you for the kind words. When Jordan confessed to not reporting attrocities, that was all I needed to know about him. This guy can justify in his own mind doing some very weird things with the truth if it suits his own purposes. I hope things are going well for you and yours.

I see the one of the "three faces of nodroG" is out today folks. Just put him on the pay-no-mind list.

521 pilgrim shadow  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:30:14pm

#517 ploome hineni

I disagree. I think if a REAL and RESPONSIBLE journalist was to run with a story, he/she would want more than the word of a single individual...or even a group of individuals. Don't get me wrong, I think they'll get it...eventually...if its not overblown. Mr. Jordan's remarks tend to make me think the story is 100% accurate.

This is a pretty big story to go to press with "some woman who worked at CNN and is a friend" type information.

In fact, its a blockbuster. A CNN-buster, if you will.

522 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:31:00pm
523 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:33:02pm
524 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:34:21pm
525 zuckerlilly  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:34:44pm

# 519 pilgrim shadow

The UN isn´t reformable. I think the political part of the UN should be cut off and a new organization should be founded by democraties.

526 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:37:45pm
527 EW1(SG)  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:44:44pm

#521 pilgrim shadow:

In fact, its a blockbuster. A CNN-buster, if you will.

The revelation that they refused to report atrocities in Iraq didn't hurt them. Why should this?

528 Proud Kaffir  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 12:49:10pm

CNN has become the al-jazeera of the west. They have a story reporting a marine general as saying, "Shooting people is fun."

[Link: www.cnn.com...]

Of course, only when you read further down do you discover that he actually meant that he found it rewarding to combat Islamofascist scum who prey on women and brutalize others.

I salute people like this man. Our troops should be proud of defending our citizens and citizens around the world from these death cult thugs.

It's despicable for CNN to become a western affiliate of al-jazeera and twist the truth around like this.

529 will_not_back_down  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 1:16:35pm

Saying that the US Military "targets" journalist and making a statement like this in a global public forum as a US citizen and journalist is for lack of a better word: irresponsible. While the fog of war will always exist and there will be casualties in any armed conflict and failing to try and record and document history as it unfolds will always out weigh that cost.

There are no frontlines in this conflict, there are barbaric an hideous crimes of humanity being carried out against human beings there, the enemy has crossed every line of human decency, and yet we find that the very brave people who are trying to keep all of us safe are constantly defending themselves from a global witchhunt.

Many have not agreed to take out Saddam and his sons, but we gave that man 48 hours(and 12 years) to respond and he choose not too. The dead are on his hands and nobody else.

530 sgt tom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 3:33:41pm

it is irresponsible in the least to not be sensitive to the soldier's viewpoint in this debate...
shouldering/hoisting a video camera gives the same visual signature as bringing up a shoulder launched missile. the glint of sunlight on the lens on the one is the same as in the case of the other.
are you telling me that a 19 year old kid, with the responsibility for the safety of himself and all his closest buddies, is going to wait past the fraction of a second it takes to launch that missile and ensure the death of himself and his buddies, long enough to check to see if it's a journalist? don't hold your breath! certainly none of the "special" people on the left wing would hesistate.
it's foolishness not to realize what a threat that lens flash entails.
and the return fire it invites.
if it were me, the individual concerned would be a casualty, without question.
while not the worst of shots, i am among the top percentage of shots; most soldiers would take that target down within a three round burst.
would you run up to your local police and pull up a toy pistol in a position that looks like you're about to fire? not if you anticipate living long enough to have children!

531 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 3:54:34pm

And here's another from DU on Mattis:

This is why the US NEEEDS its ass kicked and kicked good

Sorry, but this sort of shit-spewing fascinates me.

532 jwpaine  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 3:58:06pm

Oops, my bad. Posted #531 toi the wrong thread.

533 TalkinKamel  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 4:09:51pm

#520 3 Wood

Thank you, me and mine are doing quite well at the moment!

534 WriterMom  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 5:27:49pm

Is Gordon gone yet?

535 Athos  Thu, Feb 3, 2005 7:20:14pm

#534 WriterMom,

Yes, the game of Whack-a-Troll appears to be over.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

This space unintentionally left blank.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

Why do people continue to compose music, and even pretend to teach others how to do it, when they already know the answer? Nobody gives a f*ck.