LGF

-RetweetIslamic Leaders Demand Apology for Crusades

Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 1:51:59 pm PST

Egypt’s Al-Azhar University, the highest Sunni Muslim institution in the world (where the Grand Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi has gone on record many times praising suicide bombers, and where the Islamic Ruling Committee has called for Islamic nations to acquire nuclear weapons), now demands an apology from the Pope—for the Crusades.

Egyptian highest religious authority Al-Azhar has requested the Vatican to present official apologies on Christian crusades carried out against Muslims seven centuries ago.

Sheikh Fawzi Zafzaf, President of the Interfaith Dialogue Committee of Al-Azhar, said during a press conference that his committee has sent a request to the Pope last February, demanding an official apology on Christian crusades against the Muslim world, following the example of the Jews.

The principle of demanding apology from the Vatican germinated following Pope Jean Paul II’s visit to Syria and Egypt a few years ago, and the apologies the Catholic Church presented to the Jewish and some other Christian doctrines, explained Sheikh Zafzaf. “Al-Azhar is only asking for a similar treatment,” he added.

The Vatican’s ambassador to Egypt has abstained from commenting, saying that Al-Azhar’s request is now being considered by the Holy See.

TigerHawk wants an apology from Mohammed for the expansionist Islamic wars of conquest that made the Crusades necessary.

Advertisement

662 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 noshariaincanada  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:52:45am

declear the crudase and be unite

2 Maine's Michael  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:54:32am

I had a nasty shawarma in monreal last weekend.

I demand an apology.

3 not neo just conservative  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:54:38am

Kind of like apologizing for slavery. Tough luck guys, no apology here. Way before my time.

4 noshariaincanada  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:54:44am

Did you mean: declare the crusade and be united ?

[Google's suggestion :) ]

5 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:54:48am

That's pretty funny.

6 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:54:49am

I'm sorry.

I'm sorry we gave up.

7 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:00am

Pope to Al-Azhar:

"Nuts!"

8 dazoid81  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:12am

wow, noshariaincanada... you are fast... thought I would be first AND post declear the crudase... but you beat me on both counts!

9 vxbush  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:13am

Nothing like holding a grudge for, you know, a thousand years.

Sheesh.

10 noshariaincanada  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:36am

#8, i have technology :)

11 Maine's Michael  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:41am

Also, the tahini sauce was runny. I'll need an apology for that too.

12 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:49am
13 Joe Bananas...in Pyjamas  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:55:50am

Good but the Pope should then demand an apology from this idiot for the massacres that Muhammand comitted upon the Arabs and the Jews during his "conquests".

14 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:01am

These [bigoted word]s are nothing if not persistent.

15 hm  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:16am

That depends on what the meaning of the word apology is.

16 cat dancing  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:48am

I demand an apology for all the past mistreatment of left-handers by the Church!

17 scaramouche  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:50am

I demand an apology for all the Jews Mo killed in Medina. Also, for turning us into apes and pigs.

18 AG in Houston  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:50am

Funny stuff.

I expected a link to the Onion or Iowahawk...

19 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:57am

When will the Dinosaurs get an apology? The trilobites?

20 Dave Ray  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:56:58am

I demand an apology.

Don't know what for yet...but I'm sure there's something in the last couple of thousand years that I'm pissed about that I can't quite think about now.

Now where's the Pope's address?

21 RC neo-Jew  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:57:38am
The Vatican’s ambassador to Egypt has abstained from commenting, saying that Al-Azhar’s request is now being considered by the Holy See.

Polite Vatican-diplomat-speak.

Possible translation: "On yer bike, mate!"

22 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:57:41am

#17 scaramouche

That's sons of apes and pigs!

23 Maine's Michael  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:57:44am

How about an apology from the Mufti of Jerusalem for not only siding with Hitler, but helpong him plan the murder of jews in the Balkans.

And that was in recent memory, too.

24 Paul from Hamburg  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:57:54am

What is sad about all this is how many American kids will think that this is a good idea. Public schools always talk about how evil and nasty the crusades were. They never really explain that they crusades were actually a counter-attack against Muslim invaders.

25 Renna  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:58:11am

Well, it's only fair since they have all been so contrite about all those attacks in the name of their religion.

/sarc

26 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:58:12am

I demand George Lucas apologize for Jar Jar Binx.

27 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:58:38am

21 RC neo-Jew

Possible translation: "On yer bike, mate!"

Sorry, I'm from Ohio. Could you translate the translation?

28 JohnSteele  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:59:01am

Absurd

The Pope should "apologize" for the Crusades on one of two conditions:

1. Hell freeezes over

2. Grand Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi and the maroons at Al-Azhar University will:
- beg the West's forgivness for Islamic terrorism;
- demand that Muslims worldwide stop this crap;
- promise to stop teaching that terrorism is good;
- and promise to turn over to the West any Muslim who commits a terrorist act anywhere in the world.

Then and only then should the Pope even consider an "apology" for anything.

29 bhop  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:59:41am

I agree with #6. The apology should be for failing to do what was intended.

30 Vedado  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:59:52am

Sorry we didn't finish it

31 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:59:57am

They got all the sand, we got all the trees. It was a fair trade.

32 MickC  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:00:09pm

Sure, we'll apologize. First, give us back Rhodes,apologize for the sieges of Vienna,Malta,the attacks on Eastern Europe that lasted hundreds of years and siding with the Kaiser in WW1. If not, kiss our asses.

Yours,
Catholicism.

33 TMF  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:00:20pm

I for one, am not sorry.

Fuck off, Achmed!

34 Capt. Queeg  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:00:24pm

The Pope's a little hoarse right now. Would Dhimmi Carter do? Or how about Clinton? He was always good about issuing groveling "apologies" for just about anything (except his own transgressions)...

35 TotallySirius  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:00:31pm

I demand the Islamofascists apologize for forcing the crusades by occupying our holy land.

The crusaders were just following a fatwa and declared jihad on the Islamonazis.

36 dazoid81  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:00:35pm

26 - Peacekeeper

why limit it to JarJar? How about entirely ripping apart the mythology and history of the original trilogy and turning ObiWan into a liar.

37 Chuck Pelto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:00pm

TO: The Muslims
RE: Sure Thing...

...just as soon as you guys apologizes for the conquest of Spain, Greece, the Balkans, the 9th Century Invasion of France, the attempted conquest of Austria and Hungary, etc., etc., etc.

After you...gentlemen.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. And promise never to do anything like that again.

38 religion of bacon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:11pm

How do you say "kiss my pointing-towards-Mecca ass" in Arabic?

39 The Dread Pirate Gryphon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:14pm

If anyone deserves an apology for the Crusades, it's the Jews - but the more I learn, the less I care. Especially if the word "Crusade" makes the Islamofascists shit their pants.

40 Flanstein  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:29pm

As a Canadian, I'd like to apologise for Celine Dion, Brian Adams and Shania...

41 CheezNCrackers  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:30pm

Sod off, Swampy!

42 scaramouche  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:01:35pm

#22 Ward Cleaver

Oh Ward, you're such a stickler! He turned the Jews of the time into apes and pigs, (a literal transformation, according to the majority of interpretations) so the simian and porcine have been embedded in our DNA ever since.

43 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:02:27pm

I demand an apology for the Islamic conquest of North Africa!

44 ErnieG  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:02:47pm

Another possible translation: "Sod off, Swampy!"

45 Studsup  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:07pm

The Vatican might apologize. It would not shock me in the least. The Catholic Church has been assailed by Islam across the globe and the Vatican has done nothing except heap scorn on the USA for standing up to the menace. Add to the fact that the Church has shown an appalling lack of willingness to root out unprecedented levels of moral corruption within its own ranks (a polite way of saying that the corruption is institutionalized and enabled at very high levels), and probably is not fit to defend itself anyhow.

I say the Vatican attempts to appease and wager 1,000 quatloos.

46 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:08pm

#36 Dazoid81

Don't get me started! :)

47 ErnieG  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:47pm

#41 CheezNCrackers

Great minds...

48 scaramouche  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:48pm

#40 Flanstein

As a Canadian, I'd like to apologise for Celine Dion, Brian Adams and Shania...

And soon, perhaps, also for Sharia.

49 MickC  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:49pm

Oh yea, and we also want an apology for the invasion of Spain and France. We also want an apology for the multi-century occupation of Spain. And, ya know what? Throw in an apology for the Persian Empire's attempted invasions of Europe. I know they weren't muslim, but they were Arabs and we are being trivial today. Until then, smoke a pole ya humps.

-Pope John Paul II.

50 vxbush  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:52pm

"I want an apology for all those hospitals and schools and...


Oh. Never mind."

/Emily Litella (sp?)

51 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:03:52pm

I demand they eat slag and die. No apologies for something I had no hand in.

52 Capt. Queeg  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:04:30pm

#40 Flanstein

Not Shania!

53 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:04:35pm

I demand Kevin Costner apologize for Waterworld.

54 JohnSteele  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:05:24pm

#53 Peacekeeper

I demand Kevin Costner apologize for Kevin Costner.

55 Absoludicrious  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:05:58pm

I demand an apology for the Assyrian wars of conquest that made the Babylonian wars of conquest necessary, and for the Babylonian wars of conquest that made the Persian wars of conquest necessary, and for the Persian wars of conquest that made the Greek wars of conquest necessary, and for the Greek wars of conquest that made the Roman wars of conquest necessary, and...

Anyway, if you think the Crusades were "necessary," you've got a might strange definition of necessary, and if you think Mohammed and the Arabs were the first people to go on an unprovoked campaign of conquest, well, you clearly never took Western Civ I.

56 Powderfinger  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:06:06pm

Like the Pope doesn't have bigger things to worry about.

57 scaramouche  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:06:07pm

I demand an apology for the destruction of the Second Temple, and for the construction of an Islamic mosque on the site.

58 davic  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:06:35pm

Dhimmi THIS!

59 Renna  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:06:36pm

I demand an apology for New Coke.

60 CheezNCrackers  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:06:54pm
#47 ErnieG 3/17/2005 02:03PM PST

Heh!

Right you are, Ken.

61 ErnieG  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:01pm

They should apologize to Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton for not asking them first.

62 Maine's Michael  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:22pm

I liked Waterworld, at least the Smokers.

"Smokers!"

63 cat dancing  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:25pm

"I demand an apology for all the past mistreatment of left-handers by the Church!"


On second thought, since everyone knows why left handers were shunned, fageddaboudit.

64 Norwegian kafir  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:28pm

Human rights in Islam

Western media presents a distorted image of Islam. The Islamic way of life lays emphasis on justice. It treats humanity on equal footing and provides freedom after ending slavery. The charter of human rights which the United Nations presented before the world in 1948 was preached by the Prophet of Islam 1400 years ago. (Translated from Urdu)

65 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:30pm

How about apologizing to us for not supporting the Christians and Jews against the current Islamic Jihad?

Where's the Pope Phone? Hello?

66 Blue Chip  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:07:37pm

“In other news, the people of Germany and Japan are demanding the United States apologize for World War II, crappy American sit-coms and Britney Spears. They are however, grateful for cell phones, Bruce Willis movies and Internet porn.”

//Ken Brockman

67 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:08:25pm
Bitches Ain't Shit

Uh, what kind of music are you listening to Charles?

68 JohnSteele  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:08:34pm

Maybe George Bush would apologize? I dooonnn't thiiinnk sooo.

69 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:08:39pm

Shouldn't someone apologize for Elton John too?

70 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:08:45pm

OT

Moral relativist on previous thread watch.

They go and stick a large settlement of Jews right in the middle of a country of Arabs. Pretty soon the Jews start claiming land as their own, and making it clear that they have a massive superiority complex. Shortly thereafter, America, guided mostly by sympathy for them, decides to give them a huge foreign aid budget. Meanwhile, the Palestinians are poor. The Israelis don't share, understandably. but as they start building more and more houses on the Palestinian land, the Palestinians realize that they're being pushed out of their land.

I'm not saying the Palestinians are a civilized people, not by a long shot. They're more comparable to an Indian tribe. But this site rushes to post every time a suicide bombing occurs. I'll agree, they're despicable, and the Palestinians are despicable.

But what they don't post is all the new buildings that the Israelis build in Palestinian terrority which are illegal. They do this constantly, so the Palestinians, which are creatures of habit, have made a habbit of responding the only way they are capable.

I love the smell of troll squashing, it smells like a 3 week old sippy cup of milk that rolled under the car seat.

71 gymnast  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:09:06pm

Popes responce. "Fugetaboutit"

72 Megan  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:09:23pm

They're demanding an apology? Muslims take Sgrena hsostage and now they're acting like her. (I know, different country.) Reverse Stockholm syndrome?

73 Orbit Rain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:09:25pm

...hmmm...apologize for defending Christians against a murderous horde? . . . good luck with that one...you too have a warped understanding of history Tantawi.

74 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:09:43pm

I demand an apology from Canada for that f'dup round bacon.

75 Maine's Michael  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:10:07pm

I demand the music industry apologize for Michael Jackson.

Come to think about it, I demand the Plastic Surgery industry apologixe for Michael Jackson too.

And for Greta van susteren.

76 Studsup  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:10:56pm

#53 Peacekeeper -- "I demand Kevin Costner apologize for Waterworld. "

Not until he apologizes for "Dances with Wolves" first.

77 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:10:56pm
78 noshariaincanada  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:11:03pm

#40 Flanstein, #52 Capt. Queeg

NOT shania !

#48 scarmouche

hopefully also not sharia. (may commonsense prevail!)

79 dhimmishelter  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:05pm

When will these crackpots ever hop on the bus that left the seventh century? From referring to Christians as "worshipers of the cross," to polygamy and treating women as chattel, these anachronistic psycopaths would be laughingly irrelevant if they weren't so bloodthirsty.

Although I am late on this, my first impulse after "drop dead you morons," was that apologies are in order for every blood-filled Muslim conquest from Spain throughout Asia, their involvement in the African slave trade, (which they still conduct), and their continued daily murder of innocents from Bali to Spain to North America in the name of their death cult masquerading as a religion.

Some might argue that the Crusades did not go far enough, given the hateful cankerous nature of the ROP.

80 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:19pm

"Public schools always talk about how evil and nasty the crusades were."

During the first Crusade, in just the Rhine Valley, 12,000 Jews were killed. There were eight more crusades until 1272.

In one incident, crusaders forced every jew in Jerusalem into a burning shul. Anyone who tried to escape was forced back in.

Many Jews commited suicide rather than be forced to convert.

Muslims were actually much more tolerant of Jews during this period than Christians were.

81 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:25pm

What about the Cambrian extinction? Huh? Whose gonna apologize for that?

82 Powderfinger  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:36pm

As soon as al-Azhar apologizes to the Jews...

83 RC neo-Jew  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:40pm

#27 Aladin Sane

Translation of
On yer bike!

So what would the people of Ohio say to Sheikh Fawzi Zafzaf?

(Zafzaf? Isn't that a drink?)

84 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:12:41pm

I demand Massachusetts apologize for Teddy Kennedy and John Kerry!

85 Norwegian kafir  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:13:13pm

The Crusades were aggressive the same way D-Day in Normandy was aggression against Nazi Germany in 1944.

86 Belize042  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:13:26pm

I demand an apology from Donald Trump for his hair (Apology from the hair itself will do), Joseph Kennedy Sr. for siring despicable wretches, and that guy in the blue Celica who cut me off in traffic on January 20.

87 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:13:40pm

Only when they apologize on their knees for the rape of Africa, the conquest of Spain, the eradication of the Byzantine Empire and all it's western culture, the pillage of hundreds of churches and subsequent desicration by turning them into stinking places of worship of the moon diety.

Then we'll get onto the other smaller atrocities Islam has foisted on the world. In other words:

Sod off Swampies.

88 sharona  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:31pm

This is why these "cultures" are stuck in the dark ages. To lamely paraphrase Chris Rock's infamous "If you call you Grandmother 'Mom' and your Mother 'Pam' ... you're goin' to jail":

If you carry a grudge from hundreds of years ago & you see women as breeders and slaves ...

You ain't goin' anywhere but Mecca.

89 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:36pm

83 RC neo-Jew

Thanks for the translation. In Ohio, we'd just say "Fuck off asshole!" But hey, we're in flyover country anyway.

90 Capt. Queeg  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:48pm

I see a franchise opportunity for these asshats...

91 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:50pm
92 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:54pm

I demand American Infidel apologize for liking that misbegotten mess that starts with Costner drinking his own piss! Or had you forgotten that? I'm waiting... (crosses arms and taps foot).

93 Charles  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:14:56pm

Sarah D.: Heh ... that's the latest single from Ben Folds. It's a brutal parody of gangsta rap.

94 Pronghorn  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:15:12pm

Massachusets could never apologize enough.

95 FlyingTigress  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:15:33pm

I'd like to apologize for the rape and pillage of Western Europe done by my paternal-lineage ancestors, and aggresive colonization of Iceland and Greenland (what a mistake THAT was!) -- and the slaughter of Skralings in Vinland.

s/Kristen

/sarc

96 Renna  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:15:42pm

Well, I'm getting the feeling they might have more luck from the sorryeverybody.com crowd than this one.

97 erp  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:15:55pm

An all purpose apology from Adam and Eve for causing all the trouble in first place would be in order about now. Ditto the serpent. Let's start all over again and do it right this time. Don't bite that damn apple and we'll all be blissfully ignorant living in paradise.

98 FlyingTigress  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:00pm

I won't apologize for lutefisk, however.

99 Blue Chip  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:04pm

*whisper* should Richard Dreyfus apologize for "Mr. Holland's Opus" ? *whisper*

just saying. . .

100 Hhar  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:23pm

I think an apology is in order.

Apology: noun: "A formal justification or defense."

Not only in order, but fairly straightforward and easy to do. I'll do it for il Papa: Arab imperialism was threatening Europe.

I doubt the good Sheik will be satisfied but hey, that's his problem.

101 LouMinatti  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:23pm

This is completely and utterly off-topic, but since many of the readers here live in California and other high-priced areas I figured this is as good a place to ask as any.

My question is: How can you people in LA afford it? I looked at comparable real estate (typical tract homes) in parts of Houston and Orange County. The enormous housing bubble should be obvious to California residents, but I suspect it isn't - you guys are STILL bidding up the prices! I have more written here if you want to read it:

[Link: louminatti.blogspot.com...]

Better sell while you can! I've heard that those inside a bubble can never see it.

102 sharona  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:47pm

Speaking of demanding apologies, one of my faves is Harvey Keitel in "Resevior Dogs":

"Your shoot me in a dream, you better wake up and apologize!"
103 dak  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:50pm

Just as soon as they hand back Constantinople (and repair the cathedral that was butchered into a mosque), pay reparations for the invasion of Spain and Austria (and other European regions such as the Balkans), aplogize for the Ottoman empire, hand back north africa, "the holy land" and other regions that belonged to the eastern (christian) Roman empire.

104 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:54pm

I demand that the picture of rocks in the 7W ad be replaced immediately with our beloved hot chick.

105 Brenda  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:16:57pm

I'm not sorry.


Time for another "not sorry" website, medieval version?

106 redstateredneck  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:17:03pm

What, no reparations?

107 helloworld  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:17:04pm

ah the sharks smell blood and are going in for the kill. if i were the pope i'd declare islam a heretic religion and start a new crusade.

108 Dave Ray  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:18:13pm

Blue Chip:

“In other news, the people of Germany and Japan are demanding the United States apologize for World War II, crappy American sit-coms and Britney Spears. They are however, grateful for cell phones, Bruce Willis movies and Internet porn.”

...you forgot David Hasselhof and dodgy glam metal.

109 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:18:19pm

MM (#23):

How about an apology from the Mufti of Jerusalem for not only siding with Hitler, but helpong him plan the murder of jews in the Balkans.

Not just the Balkans. The Holocaust itself was, for the large part, his idea.

110 Studsup  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:18:40pm

Come to think of it, didn't the English have to pay a ransom to get back Richard the Lionheart from his failed Crusade? Now they want an apology too?

111 Renna  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:18:51pm

#107 helloworld

Well, that would certainly be unexpected.

112 alkmyst  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:18:55pm

I demand an apology from The Clash for featuring a video in which a Hasid and an arab eating McDonald's

I also demand an apology from all the people who voted for sKerry. a public apology. With pictures. And I want it on a prominent website.

113 alegrias  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:19:00pm

What chutzpah. Are they taking talking points from our LLLs and democrat/victim party, restititution this, remedy that, rewrite history to suit me?

114 TotallySirius  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:19:05pm

I also demand someone apologize for leisure suits,disco,capri pants and those stupid, colored,skinny ass cigarettes.

115 Luigi  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:20:14pm
Sheikh Fawzi Zafzaf, President of the Interfaith Dialogue Committee


Nursing a 800-year-old grudge is a psychopath's idea of a suitable subject for "interfaith dailogue".

116 Blue Chip  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:20:17pm

#84 Aladin Sane

As a resident of Massachusetts, I offer my humble apologies (and ask for your sympathies).


//conservatives in Mass

117 religion of bacon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:20:56pm

And don't forget, the next step after an apology is... reparations!

The Islamic world will claim that the only reason that their technological progress stopped 1000 years ago is that evil Christians and Jews subjugated them. So if we assume that Riyadh would have naturally become the Silicon Valley of the Arab world, and the Islamic economy (excluding oil) would be the size of that of the US plus Europe, the lost revenues that are owed to them would be at least in the tens of trillions of dollars, right?

So before the Pope apologizes, he might consider that the next thing they'll want is the assets of the Catholic Church, as a down payment on what's owed them.

118 Ojoe  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:21:24pm

The Crusades were a good idea. Too bad the Crusaders didn't roll on to Mecca.

119 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:22:13pm
120 redstateredneck  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:22:20pm

112 alkmyst

I also demand an apology from all the people who voted for sKerry. a public apology. With pictures. And I want it on a prominent website


It's called sorryeverybody.com. Trouble is, they're apologizing for not winning.

121 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:22:22pm
122 el presidente'  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:22:27pm

The Crusades were defensive, the Hitler of that time in history ,was Mohhamed.

Moh and his gang would go village to village, kill the men, rape the women and children, and take the loot.

This is how he came to power.

An apology would be like, the Jewish apologizing for Hitler.

123 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:09pm

#93 Charles

I'm pretty sure I'm glad I can't hear it.

:-)

124 FlyingTigress  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:28pm

#106

How 'bout multiple independently-targetable reparations in the form delivered by Minuteman?

When you care enough to send the very best! -- s/ C.O. Grand Forks, Malstrom, Minot and F.E. Warren AF Bases

125 religion of bacon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:30pm

#106 redstateredneck

Aww, you beat me to it.

126 Luigi  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:37pm

Oh, by the way, if you're looking for a working definition of The Crusades, try this

A mass uprising of Dark Age semi-barbarians led by mad monks and crazed clerics to liberate Jerusalem and The Holy Land from the infidel and the Jews.


If the show fits, Fawzi, wear it.

127 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:53pm

It is now well known that the Crusades were a belated defensive measure against the Jihad that was ongoing against Christian countries in the ME. I hope therefore that the Vatican will ask for an apology from muslims for the Jihad and the subsequent massacres of Christians and Jews at the time.

Moving to the present and a bit more relevant - when are islamic leaders going to apologise for the genocide of Christians and Animists in Sudan? Also the massacres of Christians in Sulawesi, Indonesia.

As Al-Azhar is in Egypt - when is Al-Azhar going to condemn the government sanctioned discrimination of Copts in Egypt, the kidnapping and forced conversion of Coptic girls to islam?

When are muslims going to apologise for the greatest genocide in history - the massacre of some 70 to 80 million Hindus in their own land?

It is time that muslims renounce both dhimmitude and jihad against non-Muslims, and openly acknowledge the horrific devastation they have unleashed on mankind over the last 1400 years.

Islam has a lot to apologise for, but I will be content if muslims apologised for just one individual - muhammed, in recognition that he was a thoroughly debased individual.

128 sixstringslinger  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:23:54pm

An apology to the Muslims for the crusades? Well, let's see, um, ahhh, ah-hem, well we probably could, ummm...no.

129 TotallySirius  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:24:44pm

They got their apology(and reparations) in 1947,1967,1973

Bwahahahahahaha

130 Bob's Kid  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:24:45pm
The Vatican might apologize. It would not shock me in the least.

I'd be surprised if they didn't.

131 metapod  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:24:57pm

Crusades, oh yeah. That's when Frodo had to take those horses to battle Middle Earth.

132 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:25:26pm

#107

"ah the sharks smell blood and are going in for the kill. if i were the pope i'd declare islam a heretic religion and start a new crusade."

And don't forget to kill as many Jews on the way as possible!

133 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:25pm
134 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:41pm

45 studsup

The Vatican might apologize. It would not shock me in the least.

I fear that you may be right.

BTW, hasnt the Vatican already apologised for the Crusades?

135 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:43pm

I demand the Spanish apologize to the bulls...

[Link: www.junkstuff.dk...]

136 Robert D  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:55pm

#101

City dwellers are in Calif. are mostly moonbats that need to flock together, no matter the cost.

137 cjstavern  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:58pm

I demand an apology from Steven Bochco for "Cop Rock!"

138 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:26:58pm

#26 Peacekeeper
Maybe Chewbacca will beat up Jar Jar's father in the new movie. Keep a good thought.

139 RC neo-Jew  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:27:43pm
Sheikh Fawzi Zafzaf

I demand an aplogy from Zafzaf for Zamzam (or Zumzum)

Zam Zam

In 1971, an Egyptian doctor wrote to the European Press, a letter saying that Zumzum water was not fit for drinking purposes. I immediately thought that this was just a form of prejudice against the Muslims and that since his statement was based on the assumption that since the Ka'aba was a shallow place (below sea level) and located in the center of the city of Makkah, the wastewater of the city collecting through the drains fell into well holding the water...
140 Megan  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:28:01pm

When will Muslims apologize for Mohammed being a pedophile?

141 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:28:29pm
142 ggt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:28:29pm

the pope is old and tired, he'd probably do it. But then again, it took quite a while to apologize for the Galileo incident. Did they ever really apologize for that. I remember they apologized for the holocaust. But then again, I am getting old and am very tired right now--maybe I'll apologize if it will get them to SHUT UP.

I am really beginning to believe these whako's are professional spaghetti throwers. Sooner or later something will stick--statistically speaking. What a waste of human resources! Why waste energy throwing spaghetti when you could be building your country?

143 Jheka  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:29:07pm

The blood is frozen in my veins and the ground is shaking beneath my feet. Also, someone left the gates of hell open and there's an awful draft ...

I demand an apology!

O/T:

You friends and admirers at DU want to know:

Have you completed your daily pillaging?

144 alegrias  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:29:09pm

#122 el presidente

Ann Coulter ought to lead the last & total warfare crusade. Take no enemies.

This time with Texas cowboys up front & any remaining descendants of ye olde Spanish conquistador/swine herders bringing up the rear.

145 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:30:06pm

Will they apologize for TWELVE centuries of muslim PIRATES in the Mediterranean, raiding the European coasts and kidnapping people to enslave them or for ransom ?

146 Cato the Elder  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:30:14pm

Now I've seen everything.

Oh, wait, that's right: I still haven't seen a man eat his own head.

147 Jheka  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:30:29pm

#137 cjstavern:

Oh, come on ... you aren't looking forward to "The Shield - The Musical?"

148 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:30:35pm

I demand an apology from Lewis and Clark for eating my great great great great grandmother's dog.

149 cimom  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:30:49pm

I want an apology to whoever dreams up health food like oat bran, soy milk, and other pseudo-foods.

The Crusades were an awfully long time ago, is that when Islam peaked?

150 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:31:12pm

Hmm. No Jews are going to stand up to some of the valorizing of the Crusades that's going on here?

That's pathetic and suggests real ignorance. At least I hope it's ignorance...i.e. I hope it's not fear or self-loathing that's keeping you all so quiet.

151 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:31:12pm

OT

18Z NAM (old ETA) model shows lifted indices getting as high* as -8oC in SE Texas Saturday afternoon.

The Lifted Index can be found from looking at a skew-t thermodynamic diagram.The lifed index takes into account low level moisture. A negative lifted index indicates the possibility of convection. A lifted index less than -6C indicates the possibility of extremly intense convection. To find LI you subtract the temperature of the parcel at 500mb from the environmental temperature at 500mb.

The table below gives a general indication of the strength of convection likely, given the hight of the LFC (from Sturtevant, 1994):

LI Value Thunderstorm Potential
postitive value unlikely
0 to -2 possible with good trigger
-3 to -5 probable
less than -5 strong
note "positive" is spelled wrong, but whoever put this up at the OSU Buckeye Twister website is probably a good guy, so let it slide . Oh, and technically -8 is low, but we're talking absolute value, as long as its negative)-Ed

CAPE exceeds 3000 Joules/Kg at the same time


CAPE represents the amount of buoyant energy available to accelerate a parcel vertically, or the amount of work a parcel does on the environment. The higher the CAPE value, the more energy available to foster storm growth. CAPE is especially important when air parcels are able to reach the Layer of Free Convection (LFC). To find CAPE from a skew-T thermodynamic diagram, simply locate the area on the diagram where the parcel sounding (light green line) is warmer or farther to the right than the atmosphere sounding (red line). This corresponds to the white shaded region on the sounding below:

The white region is called the "positive energy" region. This area of this region is CAPE in Joules/kg. Naturally, the larger this area, the more CAPE, and the more energy that is available to rising parcels.
The chart below can be used objectively to gain a greater understanding of what numerical values of CAPE inidcate as it relates to convection of air parcels. A current map displayling CAPE across the country can be seen here.

CAPE value Convective potential
0 Stable
0-1000 Marginally Unstable
1000-2500 Moderately Unstable
2500-3500 Very Unstable
3500 + Extremely Unstable

It is important to remember that CAPE represents potential energy, and will only be used should a parcel be lifted to the level of free convection.

That explanantion refers to a skew-T diagram, here.

0-3 km storm relative helicity is a little lower than I'd like, about 100 J/Kg (well, traditional units are m2/s2, but J/Kg is equally valid and easier to type.) High CAPE and low-moderate shear suggests the tornado risk isn't that good, but the threat of severe wind and hail should be decent.

152 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:31:14pm
153 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:31:29pm

#146 Cato

Look again
[Link: hem.passagen.se...]

154 redstateredneck  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:31:36pm

121 American Infidel

Abram should apologize for having an affair with Hagar and begot himself Ishmael and now today we wouldn't have to deal with these wild ass moslems...


He couldn't help it; Sarai sent her to him.

155 alegrias  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:32:04pm

Are any of our $billions in US tax dollars going to fund this crappy Egyptian government approved school & "scholar"? This guy's getting on my last nerve like Wardo Churchill's ridiculous academic screeds.

156 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:32:10pm

The Poe has already apologized for the sacking of Constantinople in 1024 AD...Isn't that good enough.

You just can't satisfy some people.

157 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:32:26pm

Yawn.

158 sixstringslinger  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:32:45pm

I got yer apology right here...

[Link: www.maximum-ink.com...]

159 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:32:52pm
160 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:33:05pm

None of these links are working,,, I demand an apology.

161 lancekates  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:33:09pm

see, we don't deserve an apology for the current terrorist attacks...

but the crusades (which were wholly wrong), which no living person experienced... THAT needs an apology?


ha!

that's almost as funny as a preemptive french attack.

162 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:34:01pm
163 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:34:25pm

Will they apologize for the occupation of France and the destruction of the Louvre that happened in 2025 ?

164 lancekates  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:01pm

#154 redstateredneck

He couldn't help it; Sarai sent her to him.

you have to admit... that's the best defense for an affair..


"but honey... you TOLD me to!"

165 knotboy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:26pm

#36 dazoid81

How was Obi Wan a liar?

166 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:28pm

#161 lancekates

that's almost as funny as a preemptive french attack.

LOL! They did however invent 'preemptive surrender' ;-)

167 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:52pm

Since 3/4 of my family is originally from europe, I demand an apology from the islamists for the jihad that caused so much damage and loss to my ancestors homelands to which the crusades were the reaction.

168 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:52pm

American Infidel

(still waiting)

169 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:35:58pm

When are muslims going to apologise for the drivel that comes from the "holy" mosques in Mecca, such as this

O God, destroy the infidels and polytheists, thine enemies, the enemies of the religion. O God, make their children orphans, and defile their abodes, and cause their feet to slip, and give them and their families, and their households and their women and their children and their relations by marriage and their brothers and their friends and their possessions and their race and their wealth and their lands as booty to the Muslims

Is it any surprise that genocide of non-muslims is considered acceptable when such are the "sermons" from the mosques of Arabia?

I have on many occasions written that muslims are the first victims of islam, in that their minds were subjugated to a cult. But surely by now they must see the truth. What is wrong with muslims as humans that they do not see the poison of the koran?

170 alegrias  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:36:33pm

#150 Moishe Pipick
#152 Am Inf

Sorry for the omission, I thought it a given and understood universally this payback venture (call it whatever most p.o.'s Islamofascists) would be masterminded by fearless Joooish warriors, neocons or Karl Rove.

171 CalipHater  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:36:41pm

I demand an apology from Dan Fogelberg for making such lame music and for causing generations of guys to become more effeminate than before.

172 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:36:52pm
173 McBain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:37:01pm

Hmmm... Pesach is coming up... Did the Egyptians ever apologize for the 400-years-of-slavery thing? "Ok. Fine. Just GTF out already" wasn't technically an apology- especially when Pharoah rounded up his chariot posse and tried to renege... Just a thought.

174 Jheka  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:37:09pm

I want an apology from the Pope for not getting the job done ... and for The Children's Crusade ...

And from the Brits and Aussies and Kiwis for Vegemite and Marmite ... there's no excuse for that crap.

175 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:38:11pm
176 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:38:39pm
177 WarBicycle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:39:16pm

The Pope's response: "Go forth and multiply."

178 Lazarus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:39:40pm

#40 Flanstein

As a Canadian, I'd like to apologise for Celine Dion, Brian Adams and Shania...

No sweat, dude. You gave us Rush and hockey. More than makes up for it. Plus, Shania is easy on these imperial capitalist eyes.

179 rednaxela  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:39:44pm

OT

Re: MJ
I'm not usually inclined to agree with psychologists, but this one seems to be close to the mark:

"is a guy that's like a 10-year-old child. And, you know, he's doing what a 10-year-old would do with his little buddies. You know, they're gonna jack off, watch movies, drink wine, you know. And, you know, he doesn't even really qualify as a pedophile. He's really just this regressed 10-year-old."


[Link: www.thesmokinggun.com...]

180 IMMORTAL_CTHULHU  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:39:48pm

#174 Jheka

And from the Brits and Aussies and Kiwis for Vegemite and Marmite ... there's no excuse for that crap.

And for British 'food', Foster's beer commercials and all the sheep in NZ. But to be fair, thanks NZ for Peter Jackson and LOTR!

181 Beagle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:40:14pm

I'm very sorry the Crusaders attacked the Orthodox Church, especially the Jews, the Languedoc, and eventually lost the Crusades. Maybe if they'd stayed focused, instead of the constant infighting. Islam just keeps creeping along, like a giant amoeba.

182 lancekates  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:40:32pm

#172 Ringo

you'll understand if I'm a big hesitant to accept information about the Crusades from a catholic website...

nothing against the Catholic church, but I prefer a bit more unbiased opinion.

183 jkm  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:41:17pm

When will they apologize for the destruction of the Eastern Roman Empire? BTW, the Crusaders did not win. There are no Christain nations in the middle east.

184 alegrias  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:41:19pm

#175 Rayra

Thanks for reminder of another personnel upgrade opportunity: Bush wants El Baradei out on his heiny; think of the hawkish possibilities--and I don't mean nookyular djimmy carter!

185 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:41:36pm

American Infidel

Fer crying out loud! They were sailing around on the Exxon Valdez with no food but an endless supply of cigarettes? Does that make any sense?

186 Gabba Gabba Hey  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:41:38pm

Oh FOAD already! I'm sick of their damned demands. A plague be upon them.

187 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:42:05pm
188 Shinken  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:42:15pm

The Crusades: A Defensive Gesture
Popular perceptions paint the Crusades as an act of Christian aggression toward as alien Eastern culture. Although the desire to enrich Europe with captured plunder and lands, and the desire to spread the faith of Christianity were two important catalysts to the declaration of the Crusades, they were not the actual reasons that motivated these wars. Pope Urban II officially declared the First Crusade on Tuesday, November 27, 1095, with the goal of liberating the land formerly held by the Christians; and the liberation of oppressed Christians in the Middle East. Urban's declaration shows that the Crusades were not an aggressive venture by the Europeans, but rather a defensive move to count what they perceived as a looming threat to their lands and their faith.

Eastern aggression indirectly led to Pope Urban's declaration. After the death of Mohammed, Arab armies began successfully invading other nations. The Koran condemns aggressive acts of warfare, however, and a justification for these violations of Mohammed's principles was needed. Muslim jurists formed the concept of the jihad, or holy struggle, as the sought-after justification. The jihad's objective was to conquer the rest of the non-Muslim world "so that the world could reflect the divine unity [of God]" (Holy War, p. 40).

Under jihad, Arabs "conquered Palestine, Syria, Mesopotamia, and Egypt" (Infopedia, Byzantium). Constantinople survived two sieges, one in the 670s and another in 717-718. After the decline of the influential Abassids, the more belligerent Seljuk dynasty dominated in the 11th and 12th centuries. The Seljuks converted to Islam in the 10th century and controlled most of Iran and Iraq under Togrul Beg (c. 990-1063). Togrul's successors, Alp Arslan (c. 1029-1072) and Malik Shah (1055-1092) extended the Seljuk empire into Syria and Palestine. In 1071, Arslan conducted a campaign that resulted in the battle of Manzikert, where he routed the Byzantines. The battle of Manzikert "was the indirect cause of the Crusades" (The First Crusade, p. 28), heralding Byzantium's loss of control in Asia Minor. This loss of control "lay behind the appeal to the West in 1095" (The Crusades, p. 2). For the next ten years, Byzantium was in chaos and unable to counter the Turks. Then Emperor Alexius I of Byzantium ascended to the throne and waited for a suitable time to launch a counter-offensive against the Turks. By 1095, Alexius was ready to attack the Turks, but he desperately needed soldiers for his army. Alexius decided to send envoys to Urban's Council at Piacenza, who appealed to the assembled bishops and to the Pope to "send members of their flocks eastward to fight for their faith" (The First Crusade, p. 40). It is said that Urban told his audience that "a grave report has come from the lands around Jerusalem and from the city of Constantinople" (The Cross and the Crescent, p. 18), referring to Alexius' request for aid. Urban also stated that

. . . a people from the kingdom of the Persians, a foreign race, a race absolutely alien to God . . . has invaded the land of those Christians, has reduced the people with sword, rapine and flame. . .' (The Cross and the Crescent, p. 18)


Clearly, Muslim aggression acted as a catalyst to Urban's declaration.

(continued...)

189 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:42:40pm

@154 redstateredneck

Yeah look at the mess that woman has caused us all by sticking her nose into G-d's business!

190 savage_nation[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:43:13pm
191 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:44:24pm

155 alegrias

Not quite what you asked

Daniel Pipes brings to notice an article by Sherrie Gossett, that the Bush adminstration provided funds to an islamist group, ISNA (Islamist Society of North America), for social work. Daniel Pipes states that the ISMA is a Wahhabi organisation.

ISNA describes itself as moderate in outlook but some journalists who have examined the organization contend that it is linked it to Wahhabism, the extreme form of radical Islam that gave rise to Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda movement.
..

Mohamed El-sanousi, Director, Community Outreach & Communications for ISNA, was invited to and attended the Faith-Based Initiative meeting on March 1. He told AIM his organization has already received two grants in 2003 and 2004 under the faith-based initiative from the Department of Health and Human Services; specifically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. ISNA does not itself engage in social services, El-sanousi said, but trains others to do so. "We're a community development organization," he said. "We used the grants to train Muslim community leaders in how to apply for grants to do social services."

[Link: www.aim.org...]

Mohamed El-sanousi openly admits that the funds provided are for training on how to milk the system. I presume that funds so raised are for training islamic clerics.

I suppose that the ISMA is dedicated to furthering peace and tolerance in accordance with the principles of the RoP.
Sometimes one wants to throw up one's hands in despair.

192 dazoid81  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:44:29pm

165 - knotboy

In the original (a new hope), old Ben Kenobi tells luke that when he first met Luke's father he was a powerful guy. In episode 1 though, Luke's father is clearly a little kid when Obi Wan meets him. Obi Wan also says that Yoda was his trainer, when episode one shows us that Qui Gon was his trainer. And thats not even getting into the whole changing the force from something supernatural to something genetic!

193 savage_nation[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:44:49pm
194 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:45:01pm

#150 Moishe Pipick

I don't think it is so much valorizing the actions of the Crusaders, so much as deriding the demands of the stupid islamists.

The Crusades weren't a bad idea, but were executed badly. It was a LONG time ago. And yes, there were many atrocities against the Jews by the Christian knights and entourage. Let's all just pick up and go on knowing that there are evil men in the world that do evil things, regardless of intentions.

Islam can't do this, as it has a hate memory that is millenia long. Furthermore I have never once heard an Islamist apologize to an infidel. Therefore they can all simply piss off!

195 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:45:10pm

Of all the days, too.

Hey, I'm Irish. Someone owes me some kind of apology, right?

Or maybe it's the other way around. Whatever.

Guinness time. Yay!

196 Always Right  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:45:34pm

The Vatican’s ambassador to Egypt has abstained
from commenting, saying that Al-Azhar’s request
is now being considered by the Holy See.


Oh, oh, oh. Let's have GWB nominate the next replacement for Pope too.

It (the Vatican) really needs a thorough house cleaning. What an idiot.

197 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:45:39pm
198 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:46:27pm

188 shinken

Please send the link to the Vatican, just in case they have not read it.

199 IrishJean  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:46:52pm

In the spirit of futile apology requests - I want one from France! Oh, and the Vikings too.

200 skippyMoment  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:47:29pm

The Islamic Ruling Committee can go pound wet sand.

They were the aggressors then and now, and they want an apology from the Pope.

When pigs fly and wear pink tutus would be my response if I was the pope... guess that's why they would never let me be pope.

201 mean Gene  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:48:07pm

Apologize?

No way!

That would only lead to talk of reparations!

202 redstateredneck  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:48:16pm

189 Quark2

"Behold, you are with child, and shall bear a son; you shall call his name Ishmael; because The Lord has given heed to your affliction. He shall be a wild ass of a man, his hand against every man and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his kinsmen." (Genesis 16:11-12 RSV).


Ain't it the truth...

203 BBEV  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:48:24pm

This is just a smoke screen . To raise the hackles of the Populus for there loss of control and the expansion of FREEDOM.

204 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:49:05pm

#159 American Infidel  3/17/2005 02:32PM PST

"Perhaps they are not trying to drum up any animosity between Christian & Jews, ever think of that?

This is not a good time in world history to dig up old hurts & pain... "

Yeah, if I were a Christian I would have ignored this whole thing, as the Crusades are a terrific embarrassment, a truly evil period in history as far antisemtism goes. I probably wouldn't hail the Crusades as some sort of noble, secular defensive enterprise. Check the "Crusades Myths" limk above. (Jews hold your nose.)

Truth is, Islam used to be much better to Jews than Christianity was during this long period in history. Denying the truth never helps anyone. Christian insecurity and self-delusion does.

205 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:49:19pm
206 CalipHater  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:49:29pm

I demand an apology from the peoples of Egypt for laying the ground work for tax accounting which has made all our lives miserable.

Those that aren't math inclined should probably demand an apology for the entire arabic numberal system altogether.

207 Jheka  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:49:48pm

#196 Always Right:

That's Brilliant.

President Bush: "I'd just like to announce first that I'm appointing Richard Perle Pope, effective immediately. I won't be taking any questions but I'm sure that his Holiness, Pope Perle, will have comments later today ... oh, wait ... it's the Sabbath ... tomorrow, then.

208 J. Lichty  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:49:58pm

We Jews don't give to shits for apologies, we just want the goyim to leave us the fuck alone for a change!

Although, I would like Canada to apologize for Celine Dion, and Europe for the metric system.

209 rednaxela  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:50:08pm

Classic Kos, exposing his true beliefs:


Remember on Tuesday, how Reid stood with 37 Democratic Senators on the steps of the Capitol to warn Republicans not to employ the "nuclear option" and eliminate the filibuster on judicial nominees?

Well, guess who wasn't there?
Conspicuous by their absence from Reid's Capitol steps event were two Democrats: Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, who has voted against all but one of the Democratic filibusters since 2003, and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. Both men are up for re-election next year, and Nelson is running in a state Bush won with 66 percent of the vote.
Nelson has a good excuse. What was Lieberman's?


Hmmm, so you your ability, as a Democrat, to make a reasonable choices depends on the strength of support Republicans enjoy in your home state.

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

210 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:50:34pm

#190 Savage Nation

Library of Alexandria...

The info is not correct but I will not go into it because I don't want to create a division in here.

Info related to that: see Ipazia (Ipatia).

211 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:50:34pm

192 DAZOID81

Much has George Lucas to apologize for...

The Death Star wasn't even ADA compliant. Pure Evil.

212 Gabba Gabba Hey  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:50:40pm

158 sixstringslinger

The Man in Black *bows head in respect* One of my favourite songs:

When the Man Comes Around

213 skippyMoment  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:51:00pm

#208 J. Lichty

What did Celine Dion do?

214 foreign devil  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:51:06pm

Tell them the Christians, who were there first, want an apology for the sacking of Constantinople!

215 rednaxela  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:51:07pm

PIMF #209

make a = make

216 Robert D  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:51:45pm

#205 A I

That's what I get too.

217 J. Lichty  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:52:27pm

Pipick

Truth is, Islam used to be much better to Jews than Christianity was during this long period in history. Denying the truth never helps anyone. Christian insecurity and self-delusion does.

Yeah, dhimmitude was bliss compared to the inquisition. Boy, what a Hobson's Choice.

218 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:52:30pm

lancekates,

you'll understand if I'm a bit hesitant to accept information about the Crusades from a catholic website..

And I suppose you'd be hesitant to accept escargot recipies from a French website?

219 Luigi  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:52:32pm

Speaking of crusades, why don't we go in and take just enough Saudi oil to crash down the price to something reasonable? The people in Saudi who own this oil do not deserve to own it. Furthermore, they use the proceeds to do evil to us and practically everyone else in the world. Just the price alone (aside from what they do with the money) is killing poor people everywhere, starving them to death and making basic human needs beyond their reach.

220 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:52:36pm

AI
Naw, just another bad link. A photo of Costner being held prisoner in a septic tank-remember that one? Poopy!

(Sigh) Can we at least agree the THE POSTMAN sucked? :)

221 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:52:45pm

Since they claim to have invented it, I want an apology for algebra.

222 foreign devil  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:53:17pm

Tell the Imams that "pre-Democracy" thinking to seek to place "blame" instead of including it as historical fact, nothing more or less, no one alive today could possibly be blamed on either side for the time of the Crusades, BUT NOT TO PUT TOO FINE A POINT ON IT, the Crusades happened in response to Islamic terror!

223 CalipHater  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:53:50pm

#221 Sarah D

Already been demanded (in a sense)...

224 J. Lichty  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:53:58pm

skippy:

What did Celine Dion do?

My recollection is that she sucked.

225 fiery celt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:00pm

The Real History of the Crusades

...Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics. They are supposed to have been the epitome of self-righteousness and intolerance, a black stain on the history of the Catholic Church in particular and Western civilization in general. A breed of proto-imperialists, the Crusaders introduced Western aggression to the peaceful Middle East and then deformed the enlightened Muslim culture, leaving it in ruins. For variations on this theme, one need not look far. See, for example, Steven Runciman’s famous three-volume epic, History of the Crusades, or the BBC/A&E documentary, The Crusades, hosted by Terry Jones. Both are terrible history yet wonderfully entertaining.

So what is the truth about the Crusades? Scholars are still working some of that out. But much can already be said with certainty. For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.

Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East...

History of Islam:
The So Many Totalitarian Regimes...
... The so many battles and wars

What the Crusades Were Really Like (Part 1)

...From the time of Mohammed, Muslims had sought to conquer the Christian world. They did a pretty good job of it, too. After a few centuries of steady conquests, Muslim armies had taken all of North Africa, the Middle East, Asia Minor and most of Spain.

In other words, by the end of the 11th century the forces of Islam had captured two-thirds of the Christian world. Palestine, the home of Jesus Christ; Egypt, the birthplace of Christian monasticism; Asia Minor, where St. Paul planted the seeds of the first Christian communities -- these were not the periphery of Christianity but its very core.

And the Muslim empires were not finished yet. They continued to press westward toward Constantinople, ultimately passing it and entering Europe itself. ,,

226 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:04pm

KOS can eat slag. I used to work for Nelson and he was a decent man, and to be honest, Nebraska Democrats would be called republican in any other state. Coruse now with the loons in charge, just watch Nebraska turn crimson as they alienate the reasonable Dems in this state.

227 Lazarus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:09pm

"I apologize. I apologize for not telling you my true feelings, and for not telling you that you are a cowardly, degenerate old man, and you can go to HELL before I'll apologize to you!"

-- Rough IIRC of Kirk Douglas as Col. Dax in "Paths of Glory"

228 CalipHater  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:15pm

#221 Sarah D

see #206

229 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:16pm

#195 JammieWearingFool

I'm sorry I don't have a 6 pack of Guiness right now.

230 a.k.a. Will  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:17pm

The west should apologize for not kicking every Muslim back to the Arabian peninsula where they came from, and this should have been done well before the first crusade.

231 transferthem  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:18pm

Sure the Christians should apologise. In return, I expect that the muslims should apologise for mohammedpig's murder of Jews during his misspent life on earth. And that's just for a start.

How about apologising for Saladin invading Jerusalem, a Jewish city?

How about apologising for genocide in Darfur, Israel, Indonesia, Phillipines, Algeria...

I could go on, but better the west should declare islam illegal in western countries now and expel the maggots who are trying to spread its evil fundamentalism.

232 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:54:47pm
233 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:55:07pm
234 IrishJean  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:56:05pm

Oh - and the weather! I demand an apology for the weather; we had snow today, here in VA. Now, do I ask Ed for the apology, or Karl Rove?

235 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:56:19pm

I demand a Guinness, Damn it!

236 CheezNCrackers  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:56:31pm
Truth is, Islam used to be much better to Jews than Christianity was during this long period in history. Denying the truth never helps anyone. Christian insecurity and self-delusion does.

Well, my dear Moby, you are always welcome to whine from the comfort of ... let's say ... Damascus.

237 FlyingTigress  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:56:45pm

#199 Irish

OK. I apologize for my ancestors' (see #95) actions.

238 hm  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:57:20pm

OT OT OT

The BBC is at it again


Secret US plans for Iraq's oil

The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.


[Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

239 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:57:24pm
240 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:57:32pm

#158 & #212
Listening to the man and looking at the picture. Lovin' it!

Perfect. Yup, that's the proper response.

241 Peacekeeper  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:58:01pm

AI

I can't wait for you to come to your senses- you Costner coveting commentator. See you later!

242 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:59:11pm

#194 Orson Buggy  3/17/2005 02:45PM PST

I don't think it is so much valorizing the actions of the Crusaders, so much as deriding the demands of the stupid islamists.

This is my favorite:

#122 el presidente'

"The Crusades were defensive, the Hitler of that time in history, was Mohhamed...An apology would be like, the Jewish apologizing for Hitler. "


Ignorant and offensive!

243 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:59:26pm

229,

Since I'm not posting from a pub, I have those cool cans with the toy inside that makes noise when you open them.

244 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 12:59:56pm
Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics.

That's a good one.

245 saltmarsh  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:01:07pm

Perfidious Pigshit Cult

Go pray to the petrified dinosaur shit

Throw a stone at Your God

and kiss my ass.

246 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:02:11pm

I've only lived in two different centuries, and the 11th wasn't one of them.

But I did save money by switcing to Geico.

247 rednaxela  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:03:35pm

#244 Q

Gratefully, I missed that one.

248 Plato  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:03:38pm

I want an apology from Nissan. Maybe they were trying to get a little revenge for Nagasaki, but hey, I didn't drop it.

I wonder if that Egyptian university gets any of the $ we give Mubarik?

I still want an apology from Nissan. Ruined my whole trip.

249 Beagle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:03:46pm

#217 J. Lichty

Yeah, dhimmitude was bliss compared to the inquisition. Boy, what a Hobson's Choice.


The Inquisition got most of its techniques from the Albigensian Crusade which slaughtered as many Catholics as it did Cathars. Moreover, the modern nation of France owes its existence to the Albigensian Crusade. France: a nation built on rivers of blood. Also known as Beheadings R' Us.

250 IrishJean  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:04:20pm

Flying Tigress - accepted! Btw, did you know that the Vikings founded Ireland's cities?

251 cathyf  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:04:42pm

#130 Bob's Kid

The Vatican might apologize. It would not shock me in the least.


I'd be surprised if they didn't

Wouldn't surprise me either way. Craven appeasement is philosophically very consistent with their general attitude. On the other hand, never underestimate the power of the World's Oldest Bureaucracy to simply ignore whatever it chooses.

cathy :-)

252 GrassyKnoll_1963  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:05:40pm

The US had nothing to do with the Crusades. the EU could apologize if then want to.

I suspect that the spineless EU won't, but good for them for not yielding anyway.

253 Luigi  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:05:59pm

225 fiery celt

Steven Runciman’s famous three-volume epic, History of the Crusades, or the BBC/A&E documentary, The Crusades, hosted by Terry Jones. Both are terrible history yet wonderfully entertaining.


I recently saw both and recognized them as self-hating liberalism. Especially Jones. He could not trip over himself enough in debasing the west and kissing up to Islam. The more scholarly BBC version of history was less emotional but also knew the good guys from the bad guys -- and we ain't the good guys. I recently saw something on the History Channel, a history of the Knights Templar that presented the complexities without too much self-hating propaganda. I especially liked the back-channel alliances with the Assassins. If you blow this up -- excuse me, expand this -- you can see the state of the Assassins between the states of Antioch and Tripoli, right around where Hezbollah currently holds sway.

254 IrishJean  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:06:34pm

And Tigress - I would like to apologize for Brian Boru's defeat of the Vikings in the battle of Clontarf in 1014!
So sorry about that - but you must understand - it was the one and only time in all of history that the Irish actually united.

255 GrassyKnoll_1963  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:07:43pm

The EU should not apologize for the Crusades which was at the time a response to Islamic imperialism.

256 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:07:53pm

 
#233 American Infidel  3/17/2005 02:55PM PST


Truth is, Islam used to be much better to Jews than Christianity was during this long period in history...

"I don't believe that is the view held by Bat Ye'or, she has made it her business to study dhimmitude and it wasn't rosey for Jews under moslems..."

The majority of Jewish medieval scholars would endorse the view that Jewish life under Mulsim rule, although obviously not ideal, was better than under Christian rule. (Dhimmitude or forced conversion and death, that's an easy choice for me.)

"As for the rest & your obvious hatred of Christians, I am not going to touch that with a ten foot pole..."

I don't hate Christians. I'm just very suspicious of those who spend thier hours railing against Islam but seem incapable of even acknowledging the past sins of Christianity. Often such people skip over the facts suggesting that Islam and Christianity have more in common with each other than Christianity does with Judaism. So, just because I think "Judeo-Christian" is a misnomer, doesn't mean I hate Christians. It's hardly "obvious".

257 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:08:16pm

#252 GrassyKnoll 1963

The US had nothing to do with the Crusades

Are you joking ?
Rove convinced the Pope .

258 wanumba  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:11:38pm

I hope this isn't the rhetorical propaganda device that precedes a more conventional destructive event to jack up the terror points.

259 Speller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:12:17pm

Whenever muslims are asked to stand up a speak out against the latest koran inspired islamic atrocity they say there isn't a body or authority representing muslims the way christians are.

Well it goes both ways, how can the pope give an apology to them if they can't say sorry for their jihadis. Not that the pope owes them anything.

The pope probably will give them one anyhow. If he isn't too frail.

260 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:13:46pm

American Infidel:

"As for the rest & your obvious hatred of Christians, I am not going to touch that with a ten foot pole..."

So if a Jew doesn't kiss the ass of Christian history he obviously "hates Christians"?

You are *at least* as "obviously" antisemitic as I am anti-Christian. I'll touch that without a any pole.

261 Beagle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:14:42pm

France should apologize to southern France, the Jews, and the Orthodox Church. Then we can call it a day. Pope Innocent III should be dug up and burned, a custom which grew up under his orders and which he permitted to continue.

262 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:15:39pm

152 American Infidel

One must not forget the Zoroastrains in any apology. They were persecuted and massacred in their land of Iran, and now they are scattered around the world.

So when are muslims going to apologise to the Zoroastrians, the Buddhists for what they did in Afghanistan - hardly a stupa is left in Afghanistan and the last trace of Buddhism was destroyed by the Taleban. Apologies are also required by the Hindus.

And let us not forget the tragedy of the slavs under Turkish muslim rule slavery (i.e., harem slavery for women, and the devshirme child levy for Balkan Christian males), abductions, deportations, and massacres. The Turks also massacred over 200,000 Christian Armenians, following it up with a 20th century genocide, when they slaughtered an additional 600,000 to 800,000 Armenians.

I can see that there are too many apologies that islam has to tender to humanity. Therefore, I for one will be happy with just a single apology - an apology on behalf of muhammed to mankind.

263 cimom  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:15:51pm

I want an apology (and reparations) from Al Gore for trying to subvert our electoral process in 2000. He can include an apology for being a incompetant weenie too.

264 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:16:57pm

Wonderful.
The lord of the rings turns his red eye and everybody starts arguing with everybody else.

Excellent way to survive the war against the West declared by islam.

265 Catttt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:17:37pm

Sod off, Mohammed. We are not not sorry.

The Crusades were expeditions undertaken, in fulfilment of a solemn vow, to deliver the Holy Places from Mohammedan tyranny. I'm not sorry at all about that, because it was a good idea.

Going forward, it remains a good idea.

266 underground  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:17:42pm

Moishe,

you are acting the fool, trying to derail and MOBY-ing.

I want a apology from the Marx, for all the evil he invented.

267 eeevil conservative  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:18:14pm

OT

The Bill to expand habeas corpus to SAVE TERRI has PASSED the US SENATE! It now goes back to the House to fix the language (has to match) Then Pres Bush signs it and it is LAW!

268 underground  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:19:03pm

267 eeevil

HOOORAY!

Congratulations!

269 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:19:24pm

#267 eeevil conservative

Great news! Good job Sherri!

270 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:20:09pm

We are definitely winning the war if this is the best this guy can do is demand an apology for events hundreds of years past.

We really must be a burr under his saddle for this kind of drool to run out of his mouth.

271 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:21:58pm

Congratulations eeevil! This is a tremendous victory.

272 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:22:25pm

Remember this?

Egyptian Jurists to Sue 'The Jews' for Compensation for 'Trillions' of Tons of Gold Allegedly Stolen During Exodus from Egypt

These folks really are pathetic. We want the money, and an apology! Waaahhh.

273 zombie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:22:48pm

Personally, I have issued an apology to all Neanderthals for the damage done by my Cro-Magnon ancestors. I also apologize to Australopithicus for the ravages of Homo Habilis, from whom I am descended. I also would like to apologize to all non-anthropoid lifeforms for the savage invasion of my African ancestors when we colonized every continent and destroyed the environments thereon!

I grovel.

274 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:23:03pm

#270 Crimson Fisted

We are definitely winning the war

Sure.
No muslim immigrants come here, no mosques are being built, Europe is not going to be Eurabia in 10 to 25, Iran has no nukes and Israel lives at peace.
We are winning big.

In 50 it will be Amerabia. But hey, Bush is great !

275 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:23:49pm

#252 GrassyKnoll_1963

The US had nothing to do with the Crusades

There you guys go again with temporal causality, the second law of thermodynamics, logic, and all of that other no-fun unimaginitive stuff. Get with the program.

/Philosophy sophomore

276 Lazarus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:23:57pm

I'd kinda like an apology from Pitt, Iowa, and UTEP, right about now. But if you're an alumnus of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, you have my gratitude.

277 Malleus Dei  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:23:58pm

I want an apology for the Moslems on behalf of the millions of innocent people they enslaved.

"Moslems from the Middle East have enslaved and sold into North African slave markets no less than one million Black Africans every 100 years, for the past 1,000 years" - David Brian Davis, "Slavery And Human Progress"

That's ten million apologies they owe right there.

Plus, approximately a million European Christians were enslaved by Muslims between 1530 and 1780. The source for that is "Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800," by Professor Robert Davis of Ohio State University. Davis wrote that "Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland."

That's eleven million apologies for starters.

Then we can get what they owe us over the Moslem expansion, the destruction of the Byzantine Empire, the attacks on Vienna, the invasion of Spain, Tours...oh, the Moslems have SO SO very much to answer for.

And what we really should give them is response to this outrageous request is one last crusade.

278 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:24:29pm

I apologize for the Steelers not making it to the Superbowl.

279 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:25:15pm

This reminds me of when an Egyptian lawyer decided to sue the entire Jewish people for the articles of gold that the children of Israel took with them when escaping from slavery in Egypt 3400 years ago.

Some lawyers in Israel said that they would sue Egypt for back wages owed to Hebrew slaves for their employment in Egypt for hundreds of years prior to the escape.

The Israeli lawyers told the Egyptian lawyer to collect this back pay from Egypt, take out enough for the value of the gold, and then forward the remaining money on to the Jewish people.

280 Sarah D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:25:46pm

I apologize for not giving a rats a$$ about football.

281 eeevil conservative  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:25:58pm

WOOO HOOO! WHAT GREAT NEWS!

I think I am going to go out for Mexican and have a Marquarita!

282 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:26:50pm

Are we going to pro-actively apologize for the destruction of the environment in ANWAR? If so, are the bears going to reto-actively apologize for crapping in the woods? This could get fun.

283 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:26:52pm

#266 underground  3/17/2005 03:17PM PST
 
"Moishe,

you are acting the fool, trying to derail and MOBY-ing."

Sorry to derail your fond memories of the Crusades.

I don't know what "MOBY-ing" is, but I'm guessing "MOBY" is some sort of "liberal" who said something stupid. Therefore any reference to the subject he spoke foolishly on is automatically disqualified from honest debate.

Sorry, I'll wise-up. The Crusades were AWESOME (dude).


Jews for the Crusades!

284 Aladin Sane  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:27:03pm

280 Sarah D.

Apology accepted.

285 Beagle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:27:32pm

#264 Poitiers-Lepanto

Wonderful.
The lord of the rings turns his red eye and everybody starts arguing with everybody else.


Very much like the phenomenon which turned all the Crusades into failure or bloodbaths eventually. Muslims play divide and conquer. They know the only high point in Islamic culture is when the West was at its nadir. No better way to start a fight than bring up the Crusades.

The Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople and never quite made it to Jerusalem.

The Albigensian Crusade destroyed the Cathars and laid the intellectual and mechanical foundation for the Inquisition.

All the Crusades caused the Jews to scatter or be killed. The Albigensian Crusade is where the French* began requiring Jews to wear identification.

I'd like to remind everyone that, supposedly, we've moved past theocratic wars here in the West.

*The French were the driving force in all the Crusades. This helps explain why they were so poorly executed.

286 Asylum Aleikum  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:27:36pm

I too demand an apology from the Pope - for not finishing the job.

287 eeevil conservative  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:27:43pm

THANKS TO ALL OF YOU THAT HELPED!

YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS MEANS TO TERRI'S FAMILY!

I am SOOO CRYING!

HAPPY TEARS!

288 JimmyTheClaw  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:27:51pm

i'll apologize in advance of the west muking necca and destroying that rock idol that muslims worship.

/uncrosses fingers

289 Gabba Gabba Hey  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:28:07pm

I demand an apology from Freud. I had to study the old fart damn near every year of my undergrad degree. I didn't have to study him in grad school, but I had to endure a boring classmate who referred to him for everything. I swear she probably read to see what he said about wiping back to front or front to back. I demand an apology from that loquacious twit as well.

290 rorschach  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:28:09pm

O.K. If I must, I must.

I humbly apologize for the West turning Mecca and Medina into a glass covered parking lot.

/(oops. I hope I didn't let the cat out of the bag.)

291 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:28:16pm

#272
Oh geez! The amount

In other words, 1,125 trillion tons of gold, that is, a million multiplied by a million tons of gold. This is for one stolen ton. The stolen gold is estimated at 300 tons, and it was not stolen for 1,000 years, but for 5,758 years, by the Jewish reckoning. Therefore, the debt is very large…

I am not familiar with Egyptian history, but don't they historically deny the Exodus?

292 Sydney Carton  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:28:45pm

"Often such people skip over the facts suggesting that Islam and Christianity have more in common with each other than Christianity does with Judaism. "

In what sense are Islam and Christianity more closely linked than Christianity and Judiasm? This obtuse statement needs more explanation.

293 MyDogHasFleas  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:29:04pm

This is probably a good idea. Why not apologize? What's to be lost if you don't? The Catholic Church is pretty well out of power these days anyway.

294 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:29:53pm

@262 DP111

last trace of Buddhism was destroyed by the Taleban.

You didn't hear the news? They've discovered a couple of small Buddahs close by where the big ones were blown up! :)

And yes, the Armenians are overdue a most profuse apology.

295 odrady  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:30:17pm

I'm an American first, Irish always...but my Irish component is due about, ummm, two hundred apologies!

No wait, this country has given my ancestors and I unprecedented freedoms, ample opportunities, and unrivaled equality for the three hundred years we've been here.

So, never mind...

Hey Islam, suck it up and cope.

296 fiery celt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:30:18pm

pipick

Truth is, Islam used to be much better to Jews than Christianity was during this long period in history. Denying the truth never helps anyone. Christian insecurity and self-delusion does.

Where did you learn your history?

Islam was literally born of Jewish blood---

What Happened to the Jews of Medina

The Treatment of Jews
in Arab/Islamic Countries
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-s emitism/Jews_in_Arab_lands_(gen).html

This is the story of the tragic end of the Jews of Medina. A case of ethnic cleansing, betrayal and genocide carried out by the Messenger of Allah (PBUH). The prophet raided the 2000 year old Jewish communities of Medina, killed their men, confiscated their properties, enslaved their wives and children and banished the unwanted with no provocation on the part of he Jews. The holy Prophet's sole motive was greed for their wealth and lust for their women.

...The numbers of the Muslims in Yathrib grow thanks to the tolerance of the Jews and their error in giving the immigrants a safe haven. Jews did not foresee that the man to whom they give asylum today would be so ungrateful that would turn against them and eventually would be the cause of their destruction...

What Muhammad did to the Jews?
The Invasion of Banu Qainuqa

The Invasion of Bani Nadir
The Invasion of Banu Quraiza

"The Jews and Christians say: 'We are the children of God and His loved ones.' Say: 'Why then does He punish you for your sins?" (Surah 5:18)

MUHAMMAD AND THE JEWS:
AN ETERNAL ENMITY

"The Day of Resurrection will not arrive until the Moslems make war against the Jews and kill them, and until a Jew hiding behind a rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: 'Oh Moslem, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'" (Sahih Bukhari 004.52.176)

The Jews of Old-Time Medina

After Muhammad's move to Medina, war broke out between his new supporters and the Meccans. The Jewish clans of Medina remained neutral and were at first unharmed. But after an unsuccessful Meccan siege of Medina in 627, Muhammad accused the Jews of siding with the Meccans and attacked them, killing all 600 able-bodied men of the Banu-Korayzeh and enslaving or expelling the Banu-Nadir and the Banu-Kainuka. ...
And He [Allah] brought those of the People of the Scripture [the Koranic term for the Jews] who supported them [the Meccans] down from their strongholds, and cast panic into their hearts. Some ye [the faithful Muslims] slew, and ye made captive some. And He caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth, and land ye have not trodden.

... The 12th-century Jewish traveler Benjamin of Tudela reported large numbers of them still living in the Khaybar region, and it was apparently only in the 15th or 16th centuries that the last remnants of them disappeared completely.

Islam hasPracticed "Judenrein and genocide upon the Jews since it's evil and bloody inception---and will continue to do so until it's bloody final days

O YOU WHO BELIEVE! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; THEY ARE FRIENDS OF EACH OTHER; AND WHOEVER AMONGST YOU TAKES THEM FOR A FRIEND, THEN SURELY HE IS ONE OF THEM; SURELY ALLAH DOES NOT GUIDE THE UNJUST PEOPLE. (5:49-51)

297 J.D.  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:31:09pm

#293 MyDogHasFleas
You're kidding, right?

298 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:31:31pm

#267 eeevil conservative

The Bill to expand habeas corpus to SAVE TERRI has PASSED the US SENATE! It now goes back to the House to fix the language (has to match) Then Pres Bush signs it and it is LAW!

This is incredibly wonderful news!

eeevil, you are awesome for everything you did to help in this!

My best wishes to her family and to everyone who worked to make this possible!

WOW!

299 Roland  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:31:46pm

I demand the Muslims apologize to all of those camals, sheep, and goats...

300 Gabba Gabba Hey  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:33:20pm

#267 eeevil conservative

That's WONDERFUL news!

301 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:34:05pm

#274

Just my humble opinion and interpretation. Someone on the losing side tends to make comments like that. Doesn't need to be anyone else's opinion or interpretation! Sounds a lot like "wahhh apologize to me for bloodying my nose even if I did deserve it, wahhh."

IMHO.

302 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:34:24pm

I demand an apology from the Pope for not admitting that he wears a yarmulke.

That little round red hat on the back of your skull isn't fooling anyone, Your Graciousness or whatever.

It's a yarmulke. It's a kippah.

Just keep in mind that we know. :/

303 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:35:16pm

@292 Sydney Carton

If you will use Charles' search you will discover that this cut and paste argument was a waste of Charles' bandwidth yesterday.
Oranges and Apples are relative crap.

304 Pope Insouciance IV  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:35:16pm

Well, we've already apologized for the Inquisition. That got WAY out of hand.

And the Salem witch trials. They were a hoot! But also a little overboard.

But as to your apology for the crusades: go pound salt.

305 Victor  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:35:44pm

I do hereby apologize to everybody, on behalf of everyone, for everything, past, present, and future.

That settles that.

Next thread, please.

306 eeevil conservative  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:36:22pm

Thanks Sarah D. and rightasrain and I know I am missing some of you, but it is hard to type through the tears!

THANK YOU!

307 underground  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:36:48pm

Moishe,

You play this game in every thread I have seen you in, insinuating moral equivalence.

I understand that during various periods of time just about everybody got shafted, fair enough? Crusaders killed Jews, Muslims killed Christians, etc.

But whats going on in the real world today, eh?

I must have missed the recent announcement from the Pope to go kill Jews, right?

I do seem to be seeing a lot of idiocy being perpetrated by adherents to what is essentially a tribal value system.

Oh, and MOBY is a reference to an idiotarian musician of some sort...

308 Catttt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:37:05pm

Maybe Islam should compensate Africa for taking thousands of people into slavery.

Maybe Islam should compensate the people of the Russian Caucasians for the thousands of men and women sold into slavery (men to fight, women for the harems).

Maybe Islam should compensate for initiating the lucrative slave trade of Africans, later adopted and expanded to new markets by the Portuguese.

Maybe - well, you get the idea.

309 CroMagnon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:38:01pm

Interesting read:

"the Glorious Past of the Muslims Ummah"
[Link: members.lycos.nl...]
---

While most muslims try hard to paint an image of a non-violent, peaceful initial spread of Islam, a muslim historian - Dr. Moshin Farooqi - doesn't beat around the bush when he describes how the early (and later) muslims attacked, invaded and conquered parts of Europe. He even goes so far as to boast joyfully about the aggressive actions of these muslims as 'the glorious past of the Muslims Ummah'...
310 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:38:04pm

#301 Crimson Fisted

Instead I deem all the idiots who express optimistic opinions in this tragic moment of history SPIES AND ALLIES OF THE ISLAMIC INVASION.

And avoid me, because this is just a start.

And if you want to discuss my point of view, just wait another twenty years and you will be satisfied.

In France they waited too.
In Holland also.

311 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:38:33pm

@293 MyDogHasFleas

I think you must have left your collar at home.
You've also forgotten your tags.

312 Sydney Carton  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:38:36pm

re #303,

I totally agree. Thanks for the tip. I'm not a big fan of these things anyway, but that statement piqued my curiosity.

313 D.C. Law  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:38:54pm

Pipick #256 - I'm reading your posts with absolute disbelief. The idea that the [bigoted word] rule was ever better for the Jews at ANY time in history is nuts. Yes, Jews were brutalized by the Crusaders. Yes, Jews were brutalized during the Inquisition. But there was just as much brutalization going on in the [bigoted word] world, in places like Yemen, Syria, Persia, (where the custom of marrying off children at the age of 9 came into vogue because unmarried Jewish girls would be kidnapped and turned into Islamoids) and Tunisia then, and while the Christian world had an Enlightenment, and gave birth to the United States (where, ever, has there been a better place for the Jewish people?), the [bigoted word] world degenerated into a slaving backwater. As for the Jews, well, even the "good" [bigoted word]s were happy backers of Hitler. During the North African campaign, the Tunisians and Morrocans cheered Rommel, because it meant the end for their Jewish neighbors.

Stop being an insufferable putz. In these times, its the believing Christians - - people like W - - who are the only people in the wide wide world who will stand with the Jews.

So get your effin head out of the 12th Century. The threat today is the [bigoted word]s, and frankly, we all would have been better off if the Crusaders had done a better job and leveled mecca.

DAS VEULT!

314 underground  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:42:07pm

313 DC Law

I totally agree.

315 Havoc  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:43:12pm

What life was like in the "Golden Era of Islam" and How Mediteranean Europe was enslaved.

Kind of like Dafur in the Sudan Today.

316 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:43:53pm

#313 DC Law
#314 underground

I totally agree, too.

317 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:43:56pm

#313 D.C. Law

Ditto.

318 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:44:28pm

I demand Charmin apologize for Mr. Whipple!

And I demand that Wisk apologize for "ring around the collar"!

319 a.k.a. Will  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:45:02pm

Has anyone even mentioned the biggest Islamic slaughter of all in India? Millions were killed and historians say this invasion is responsible the centuries of poverty that came forward to modern times.

But some PC fools in the west probably will apologize for the crusades without a mention of Muslim deeds over the centuries.

320 Sydney Carton  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:46:00pm

OT: Looks like Sharon is heading to the Ranch:

Bush invites Sharon to Texas Ranch

321 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:47:27pm

Not interested in any apology by anyone. IF you illegally invaded Israel, murdered Jews, appropriated THEIR property in Israel and ELSEWHERE, either took over the property or transported the property OUT of Israel... WE want it back. Fuck the phony apology.

322 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:48:31pm

294 quark2

They've discovered a couple of small Buddahs close by where the big ones were blown up! :)

I did not know of this. Any links?

323 reader  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:48:32pm

Malleus Dei #277,


That is very likely a gross undercount. The Muslim slave trade, which continues today in much of the Arab Muslim sphere, especially in northern Africa, greatly exceeded the Atlantic slave trade. The numbers I've read say it in all likelihood exceeded 100,000,000 slaves, after 1,400 years and counting. The Atlantic slave trade, which lasted roughly for 400 years, was 14,000,000. Furthermore, the Atlantic slave trade would probably not have existed, certainly not on the scale that it did, were it not for Arab Muslim slavery being already well-established in Africa. Also, the slaves taken by Arab traders tended to be women, not men, to a ratio of 2 to 1. They were used for sexual servitude. More evidence of the sickness that is forever Muhammad, and his evil religion.

Muslims desperately want to be FIRST VICTIMS. Its how they sustain their propaganda, and rationalize their sick hatred of non-Muslims, which they are commanded to do by their sick prophet and weak god, Allah. The fact is Islam is history's worst offender and greatest criminal. Its record of genocidal jihads, slavery, oppression, rape, discrimination, theft no other religion or civilization can touch. They know that, which is why they must keep up the lies. I wish more people would read about this. Don't expect this history and true Islam to show anytime soon in schools.

Do something about slavery, Muslims! Oh, that's right, I forgot. Your only prophet was a racist!

324 Catttt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:48:41pm

313 D.C. Law

Well put, but I am afraid wasted on Mushy Pipsqueak. It never listens.

325 cimom  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:48:50pm

I want the environmentalists to apologize interferring with oil drilling and refining in the US (among other offenses). This makes us dependent on foreign oil for overpriced gas while pouring money into countries that sponsor terrorism.

I love those Brits who beat the stuffing out of Greenpeace.

326 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:48:58pm

@306 eeevil conservative

Hey gal! :)
Darned good, no great work! I watched her brother interviewed this morning. I sure hope there will be armed guards around her until she can be moved safely away from her assassin husband.

G-d Bless...

327 BananaRepublican  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:50:41pm

I demand an apology from the crusaders for not finishing the job.

328 CrimsonFisted  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:52:42pm

#310
Not the first time (nor the last I am sure) I have been considered an idiot. Just my opinion, I could be wrong! I have learned much here at lgf and will continue to learn.

329 David  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:53:04pm
I demand an apology from the Pope for not admitting that he wears a yarmulke.

Is that a white yarmulke you're wearing, Your Holiness, or just male-pattern baldness? Allah Pundit used torefer to him in his parody as "the Jew Pope". Because everyone who doesn't submit to Islam immediately is either a Jew or controlled by the Jews. I know. Aisha told me.

Seriously, in Italian they call the Episcopal Kippah a zuchetta. Which sounds like either a pasta sauce or a vegetable.

330 Hankmeister  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:54:31pm

Hadn't read all the posts and maybe someone has already made this point, but wasn't it the militant Seljik Turks that started the whole ball rolling when they were harassing and sometimes murdering Christian Pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land? It seems to me to be another case of the Muslim cult not wanting to take responsibility for something THEY STARTED!

331 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:54:41pm

#283 Moishe Pipick

Get real. The Crusades were awful. The people in charge were corrupt "nobility" egged on by flawed dogma, cruel in the extreme for *anyone* in their path. I think that the main body of Christians in the world today are past the false "blood libels" etc.

The idea behind the Crusades, while not entirely on target, had the general right idea. This was to get the muslim hordes out of the holy land. It is true that the knights didn't differentiate between muslim and jew as they considered both beneath them. They also considered every one else beneath them, being feudal lords, so stop feeling like the lone ranger, Moishe.

332 LoFlyer  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:54:43pm

Anything over 200 years is irrelevant to most Americans. Other people look at things differently and hold grudges forever. The Christians and the Muslims have both massacred millions, and neither side can be held blameless. Both religions have changed with the times; the Christian religion has lost much of its power with the rise of democracy and the secularity of western governments. While the Christians do have right-wing fanatics they are generally considered benign or charitable in their purpose. The Muslim religion appears based on the subjugation of all other religions and the complete rejection of modern human rights such as equality of the sexes, religions and races.
For one religion to demand an apology from another is the height of arrogance and intolerance of the other. This has all the signs of another propaganda campaign with the western journalists all jumping on the Islamic victimization image because they hate the Catholic religion most of all. I expect this story to become the basis for a claim for reparations and the justification for an Islamic invasion of Europe in ten years.

333 CheezNCrackers  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:57:15pm

I demand they bring back "Futurama" !

334 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 1:57:24pm

While we are at it I want this to happen so Jews are treated as all others:
1. Give Medina BACK to Jews
2. Want a Separate Entity or whatever you call it in the Jewish Quarter in Italy just like the Vatican has.
3. I want back all property (religious, secular, information on our people that they should know etc) stolen during the raids on Jerusalem by WHOEVER has it. GIVE IT BACK Thieves.
4. Lived in Spain and Poland long enough to establish a SEPARATE Jewish State in each of these countries..just like the Pals are being allowed to do. Some Jews can trace back their ancestery in both these places much LONGER than the so called Spanish and Polish People..Bet you didnt know that. Russia? Bet we can do the same there. Who says Jews are entitled to just ONE State? Muslims and others have control of many MANY States.

I want the PROFIT MOTIVE taken OUT of the Picture. Its a "good thing" FINANCIALLY to instigate Pogroms against Jews. Need to get rid of this same old, same old extra reason to murder Jews.

335 harley  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:00:12pm

Peacekeeper
I love Jar Jar :-)

I fear that the pope will apologize.

336 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:03:38pm

#332 LoFlyer

The Christians and the Muslims have both massacred millions, and neither side can be held blameless.

Muslims are ordered to by their faith. Christians are not. BIG difference. The actions of individual people claiming to be Christians does not change the tenets of the faith. And I disagree that the Christian faith has changed. The individuals running the denominations have done all kinds of things -- not necessarily in keeping with the faith.

Killing by Muslims, however, has always been dictated by their faith.

337 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:04:08pm

313 D C Law, 323 reader

Great posts.

319 aka will

I did mention the greatest genocide in recorded history - post #127

85 Norwegian Kaffir

Well put.

As a poster pointed out, the muslims want an apology as a first step to reparations. As muslims cant get booty through conquest anymore, the only way they can get hold off it, is by playing the victim.

It is not enough that the Western world is propping up the islamic world with billions of dollars, as well as allowing virtually unrestricted immigration of muslims (BTW, this is a crusade) - now they want an apology as well.

338 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:05:07pm

Since one group of my ancestors was almost certainly murdering another one at some point in history (and I even suspect at which point), I hereby apologize to myself and accept said apology.

339 dazoid81  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:05:34pm

333 - CheezNCrackers

HERE HERE! I did my part, bought all the dvd's...

340 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:05:36pm

If the Pope apologizes, Islamists will claim Europe as their property.

They'll want it WITH INTEREST, of course (along with all the money that European immigrants took with them when sneaking off to America.)

So they'll claim AMERICA is theirs, too. Along with Canada.

Australia and New Zealand will be the next to claim (due to their European roots.)

Anyone who's ever met a European will have their country claimed after that (as accessories after the fact.)

They'll sue to win the world.

341 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:06:19pm

@322 DP111

I'll see if I can find the linky. :)

342 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:07:11pm

Crusades? Included the murder of Jews...case anyone didn't know. They made no distinction. Also...just to clarify. Israel and Jerusalem is Jewish THEN and NOW. I know this is a NUKE statement.. Might as well set it down NOW.

Israel is a distinct and independent country and IT decides who stays and who goes. THey have been polite and accommodating but it didn't work out as they thought or hoped it would. Palestine is being set up and funded while the world knows that the Pals will just wait until the opportunity arises to DESTROY ISRAEL.

It wont be long till Israel will have to play HARDBALL for its own Survival. We get it...

343 DP111  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:08:04pm

Jihadists launch online fund-raiser

From each of us according to what we can give in support of this blessed uprising. Each of us he contributes what he can from his salary for its support. We have started this fund-raising campaign for our brothers, the mujahideen in Palestine, and all money raised will be required to be used for Jihad. For Allah above said: "fight hard in Allah's name with your money and your work"

[Link: www.jihadwatch.org...]

I'm sure that muslim escapees to the West will be donating generously.

344 reader  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:10:12pm

Malleus Dei #277,

Ronald Segal, author of "Islam's Black Slaves", who I think writes about Islam with a protective political correctness, thinks the minimal estimate of black African slaves that were taken into custody should be 30,000,000. What's left out of this number and must be factored in is the number that died in transit. A much higher percentage died, in comparison to the Atlantic trade. Estimates are at least 80% died along the slave trade routes, which spanned the continent of greater Africa. One major reason for this was Africans were often forced by Arab slave traders to march for hundreds, if not thousands of miles into the Arab lands of the north. Imagine a trail of thousands of rotting corpses in the sun, and you have a good picture of glorious Islams ignoble record of enduring African slavery.

345 FlyingTigress  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:12:34pm

#254 IrishJean


And Tigress - I would like to apologize for Brian Boru's defeat of the Vikings in the battle of Clontarf in 1014!

Apology accepted. The descendents of "Sven the Incompetent" are still on our 'poopy' list...

But, of course, the side of the family from the decended from the Clan Cameron...demand an apology from the flatlanders in the south of the island.

346 helloworld  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:15:51pm

jeez, what a shitstorm.

i don't recall mentioning the pope should declare war on judaism or invade israel. calm down moshe.

#342 vickie

they also killed eastern orthodox christians and weakened constantinople to the point where the turks were finally able to conquer it.

no one here is saying the crusaders didn't fuck up badly, but at least they tried fighting back against islam.

347 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:21:03pm
348 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:21:07pm

OT: But not that much. I was listening to the radio..bout a year ago. Little Station in N. Va. Muslim or Islamic or whatever you want to call it. Sat or Sun Afternoon. Just happened on the program. Cant bring up that program on my radio again yet. So I cant give a name or a link..But I heard what I heard. (maybe Islam thought better of talking about their "plans" and stopped broadcasting..dont know)

This is what I heard. Talk Show with Muslim Moderator and Callers. Short and Sweet..MOST callers objected to Christian Missionizing efforts (tho their PR trained people tell Americans they dont). The last conclusion was that Islam intends to Organize Anti Christian Missionizing activity PLUS they intend to put big funds into Missionizing TO Christians. Isn't that just jolly? What do you think is going to happen when two huge powerful groups come face to face with this in AMERICA?

Jews dont like to be missizoned to...and complain about it...but no one of any consequence in the Jewish Community is raising huge Mega Funding to Missionize to others. Quite a diff...right?

This is going to get very ugly and possibly violent IF Islam institutes this Organized Funded Missionizing attempt to Christians in America.

349 MeanMrMustard  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:21:49pm
350 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:23:34pm

How typically Islamic. Demanding apologies from the infidels for launching the Crusades 900 years ago, but an apology isn't exactly forthcoming for their overrunning of Christian lands which sparked the Crusades. And I don't suppose they'll apologize to the Hindus and Buddhists when they overran Pakistan, Afghanistan and Indonesia, slaughtering as they went.

The basic fact is that Muslims refuse to see anything wrong in their religion of Stone Age headchoppers, but look for faults in everybody elses, and expects everybody else to apologise for trying to stop the spread of Islam, but then, who would be sorry to see Islam go? Certainly not me.

351 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:24:04pm

@322 DP111

Still haven't located it yet. The smaller buddahs were discovered while experts were ascertaining the damage to the two larger Buddahs. Caused all kinds of excitement.

352 LeonidasOfSparta  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:26:29pm

If radical Islam REALLY wants an apology for their sorry-ass selfhoods, they should go all the way back to Sarah and demand an apology from her for letting her Egyptian maid Hagar sleep with Abraham her husband, thus bringing about the birth of a manchild-- Ishmael-- who was prophesied to be a contentious, malcontented, hairy, miserable, warmongering, hatefilled, rabblerouser who would alienate everyone...

Thus began the factious hatred that spawned between the Children of Israel springing from Abraham's son Isaac and his son Jacob aka Israel) and all of the children of Ishmael which finally led to Muslim vs. Jew and Christian.

GET OVER IT you contentious, malcontented, hairy, miserable, hatefilled warmongers and LET WOMEN YOUR be equals!

Talk about those who might have a reason to demand an apology from anyone about anything-- all those MUSLIM WOMEN who, for centuries, have been kept silent deserve AN APOLOGY.

I DEMAND THAT radical, tyrannical, Islam APOLOGIZE TO WOMEN-- ad nauseum, world without end!
and then stop marrying little girls when they are too young to tell you to go SOD OFF!

353 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:26:30pm

#348 vickie

Jews dont like to be missizoned to...and complain about it...but no one of any consequence in the Jewish Community is raising huge Mega Funding to Missionize to others.

Jews raise mega funding among ourselves to missionize to other Jews.

I've never heard of any Jewish group that missionizes to non-Jews.

The Jewish outreach for missionizing to other Jews is ENORMOUS, though, and truly wonderful.

These programs are making a huge difference.

Missionizing only to our own is very different from other religions, as you indicated. VERY VERY different.

354 scott in east bay  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:27:15pm

Perhaps someone can ask Brenda Lee to sing.."I'm sorry, so sorry, please accept my apology..."

355 Mik  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:27:43pm

Lawrence Auster has an excellent piece on West's (lack of) Response to Islam:

[Link: www.amnation.com...]

356 coulterclone  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:29:59pm

I haven't had time to read much of the thread, but as long as we're asking for apologies, how about the Muslims apologizing for the Children's Crusade when they murdered babies and sold those they didn't kill into slavery.

And how about an apology from the stink bag Paki who runs the convenience store down the street from my house who throws his garbage into the alley.

And how about an apology from the Arab world for not being able to use their left hands because Allah apparently doesn't believe in toilet paper.

And how about an apology for all the ugly hairy douche bag Muslims that are scaring Americans away from engineering and computer science and chemistry departments in large universities in the United States--and that's just the women.

And how about apologizing for those bad hoods those women wear--being an American female my blood boils every time I see some Islamic female prancing around in a veil copping a phony baloney sanctimony.

And how about an apology for turning Cat Stevens into a nut job who stopped playing music--wait, that was a good thing.
Never mind.

357 scott in east bay  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:30:25pm

Well, if the pope does apologize, I want to start a different kind of Not in My Name group.

358 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:30:35pm

Israel was an independent distinct country. NO one else had any right in there IN THE FIRST PLACE. All those groups illegally INVADED Israel.

Weve kept quiet about this... and I personally think it was a big Mistake. We did this hoping that there woudnt be established a Pal State. Now that there IS going to be a Pal State..then it is time to SAY IT LIKE IT WAS and play Hardball.

Let the Orthodox claim what was theirs for their own area of the world. What THEY are doing in Jerusalem NOW I dont know. It isn't theirs...any of it.

Israel is Israels and NO one elses. Israel makes the rules in Israel... Israel isn't a "caretaker" for ANYONE else.

Now lets see what happens when Israel says this OUTLOUD. Then see who "loves Israel" when we make this clear. Might as well know NOW.

359 nagasaki_hata  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:30:40pm

Deus vult! (God wills it)
--- Pope Urban II at the beginning of the First Crusades.

360 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:31:14pm

@347 AI

I have yet to read one post critizing islamic religion/behaviour/trustworthyness...do I need to keep listing?

361 Lyana  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:31:36pm

#351 quark2

Isthis anywhere close to what you were looking for?

Tremendous advances in the methods and practices of archaeology since the site became inaccessible in 1979 should help unravel Bamiyan’s mysteries. Tarzi has already found tantalizing clues, including several small sculptured Buddha heads and a wall that might be part of a monastery. According to Tsiang’s journal, a monastery adjoins the sleeping Buddha. “I think perhaps we are near his feet,” Tarzi says.
362 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:32:47pm

And when is Bill Gates going to apologize for Microsoft Bob?

363 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:35:15pm

Bill Gates should apologize for Windows.

364 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:41:10pm

rightasrain: I KNOW about Jews Missionizing..(think its the wrong word tho) to other Jews ONLY. It isnt the same thing at all so thats why I didnt bring it up.

rightasrain: Im not Orthodox..but fight to the death for Orthodox to be Orthadox and stay that way IF they want to and INVITE other Jews to at least become familiar with what we were all about.

If it wasn't for the Orthodox ...the rest of us would have been absorbed away long ago. They are THE ONES to stand in WITNESS to the "CONTRACT". Even tho they may not approve of me...I more than approve of them..(tho they dont require my approval) FROM THE HEART.

I dont agree with them in lots of ways...but what the heck...two Jews ..three, four, ten? Opinions..that keeps us VITAL thru all the bad times. (For G-d sakes there were Discussion Groups going on in the Death Camps) Maybe it is G-ds secret plan. We are told that we dont know his plans. We are people and G-d is G-d and not even remotely the same.

365 heidi  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:47:50pm

i got bad coffee today at starbucks and have felt quite put upon all day as a result. can someone call the pope for me on this problem as well?

366 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:48:30pm

#363 rightasrain

Apologize hell! I want him to fix it!

367 coulterclone  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:51:08pm

Virginia Kelly should apoligize for Billy Blythe.

I've been catching up on the thread...Moishe Pipick..you are just a dumb asshole with some sort of weird personal issues that you can't deal with so you blame everyone else for your problems...wow, you ARE a Pali troll! APOLOGIZE!

Hillary Clinton should apologize for Chelsea.

The Queen should apologize for Prince Charles.

Bayer should apologize for Baycol

Du Pont should apologize for Agent Orange

Germany should apologize for Hitler

Japan owes us one for Tojo

France should apologize for DeGaulle, and the rest of the French

England should apologize for starving the Irish in the 19th century, for really really bad pub food in the 20th, and for an epidemic of toxic Middle Eastern restaurants in east London in the 21st.

New Jersey should apologize for putrid dumps

Charles should apologize for that disturbing carpet humping guy in that ad...

368 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:53:42pm
369 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:53:55pm

And Robert McNamera needs to apologize for the following:

Hosing up the Vietnam war.
Hosing up the Thunderbird.
The Edsel.
His lame book.

370 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:54:38pm
371 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:57:01pm

#366 Orson Buggy

Apologize hell! I want him to fix it!

Ain't going to happen. XP is the end of the line. From now on, you won't buy software, you'll rent it. Of course, there are penguins...

372 EE  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:58:04pm
Jihad is sometimes presented as the Muslim equivalent of the Crusade, and the two are seen as more or less equivalent. In a sense this is true -- both were proclaimed and waged as holy wars for the true faith against an infidel enemy. But there is a difference. The Crusade is a late development in Christian history and, in a sense, marks a radical departure from basic Christian values as expressed in the Gospels. Christendom had been under attack since the seventh century, and had lost vast territories to Muslim rule; the concept of a holy war, more commonly, a just war, was familiar since antiquity. Yet in the long struggle between Islam and Christendom, the Crusade was late, limited, and of relatively brief duration. Jihad is present from the beginning of Islamic history -- in scripture, in the life of the Prophet, and in the actions of his companions and immediate successors. It has continued throughout Islamic history and retains its appeal to the present day.


-- The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, by Bernard Lewis.

373 Aisha  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 2:59:44pm

I want a f**king apology from whichever of you kafirs put the itching powder in my burkha. A Muslimah ripping of the hijaab and running naked down the street while scratching her private parts and being beaten by half a dozen Arab men is NOT FUNNY AT ALL kaffirs! ALLAHU AKHBAR!

374 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:04:33pm

@361 Lyana


That's it! Thanx, where'd you find it?

375 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:07:07pm

Orson: It isn't what you SAY...its what you DO.

Apologies mean nothing. You have to "make it RIGHT".

I hear Jews are now getting "permission" to examine Maimonides's (sp) papers..PERMISSION? Are you kidding? We are supposed to be grateful for this PERMISSION? RETURN THOSE PAPERS. They are OURS not yours. WHat ELSE do you have in your possession stolen years ago that isn't yours? We are just a small group ,with a small no of important to us and only us, items. GIVE THEM BACK!

Incidentally the Greeks are getting their artifacts back slowly but surely. They dont belong in other countries without Greek PERMISSION. How dare others just cart away Greek Ancient Culture and claim ownership for themselves? Its the same damn thing. I support the Greeks. Some of the most important "artifacts" are sitting in ENGLAND. Give it the hell back to Greece ENgland. It isn't YOURS..nor your Culture. Egypt has been demanding the same thing as well and getting results.

The US is quietly returning the BONES of Dead Native Americans TO Native Americans so that they can hold services and hold their own ceremonies for their own PEOPLE. The US is also transferring ownership of many Native American Artifacts TO the actual people that these artifacts belong to ie Native Americans THEN...the Native Americans can decide for themselves where these items should reside. Its the RIGHT THING..to do.

376 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:07:33pm

What's worse is that people take these rantings seriously...they agree with them...how pathetic...and we are supposed to respect these people? They complain about infidels humiliating them...they're doing a pretty good job of it all on their own...

377 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:08:07pm

#347 American Infidel  3/17/2005 04:21PM PST

"I bet the next time a subject similar to this comes up, you will start by slamming Christians... "

Yeah, the next time a bunch of non-Jews get together and make jokes celebrating a campaign that resulted in the mass murder of Jews maybe I will. Please pardon my uppity behavior, sir.


"Of course you hate [Christianity]...Your first words were of the EVILS that Christianity foisted/perpetrated upon the Jews...

Forcing every Jew in Jerusalem into a synagogue because they are Jewish, because you believe they killed your messiah, and then burning it, while forcing back-in those who try and escape, is evil. Killing 12,000 Jews just in the Rhine Valley because you think they might poison the well is evil. Were these Christians evil? Yes. Are Christians that deny this is evil, evil? You can answer this question yourself.

#307 underground  3/17/2005 03:36PM PST

"I do seem to be seeing a lot of idiocy being perpetrated by adherents to what is essentially a tribal value system."

The same Jews who remain silent here are the same Jews that deserve to intermarry an implicit antisemite like the person calling me a tribalist. That's JewWatch talk.


Or are there Jews in this thread joking about and celebrating the Crusades? Why not, I mean I'm just an oversensitive fool correct?

378 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:08:44pm

@373 Aisha

Not only will I knot apologize, I'll knot tell you who dunnit. :)

379 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:10:06pm

Vickie
I started reading Loftus' book...do you know if he has written an update? The book was written in 1994 - so much has happened since then and i'd really like to know what truly happened during the Oslo oasis period...

380 Hankmeister  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:11:37pm

Moishe Pipick, don't be so self-righteous. You're falling into the same pattern of hatred that the Islamofascists are trying to foster by their stupid demands for an apology.

If it makes you feel better, I personally apologize for the millions of Jews that were subsequently murdered by Christian Crusaders over the last one thousand years (I'm not apologizing for the Holocaust since that was the work of secular National Socialists. Remember, nearly three million Christians were also murdered by Hilter for the unwillingness to bow the knee to him). But I'm just a dumb evangelical conservative married to a Messianic Jew, so what authority do I have, right?

But now what I want from you is for you is to acknowledge that many thousands of First Century Gentile Christians (and Messianic Jews) who suffered the loss of life at the hands of Hellenistic Jews in Asia Minor. After all, citing the precedence of prior offense, I would say that was what originally got the ball rolling for the unfortunate animosity that was inexcusably cultivated between Jews and Christians down through the ages. And First Century Christians were not only the victims of local Jewry but also of the Roman authorities.

But why do you think Islamofascists often refer to Jews ("Allah has made them pigs and apes") and Christians ("followers of the Book") in the same breath? For example, Surah 5:51 encourages Muslims not to take Jews and Christians as friends...ever. "O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and Christians for friends; THEY ARE FRIENDS OF EACH OTHER; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

Whether you like it or not, Moishe, Christians and Jews have been on the same side for a long time despite their theological differences. If it makes you feel any better, "Christians" (I use the term very loosely here) have killed more Christians than they've killed Jews down through the ages - so maybe its not really personal, eh? But the biggest murderers of all are the atheist socialist/secular humanists who have butchered ten times more people in one short century (over 200 million) then both militant Christians (which historically means Roman Catholic) and Jews combined the last 2000 years! So NO ONE is exempt from this madness. SO CUT THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS CRAP. Hindus, Buddhists, animists, cannibals, eskimos, North American Indians, etc. all have blood on their hands whether they actively murdered other tribes and people or created societies which bred such diseases, famine of incompetence, moral debauchery, and lawlessness that it resulted in the deaths of its citizens.

I'm waiting for liberals, secular humanists, and moral relativists to apologize the slaughter of 45 million innocent Americans (who knows what the world total is) at the altar of "choice". There's enough blood guilt to go around without you ginning up more guilt trips. Let's deal with the here and now or are you're looking for reparations, too?

381 Bubble Girl  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:15:17pm

This thread is one big Confessional. Okay, everyone who has apologized, say one hundred Hail Mary's, five hundred Our Father's, and flog yourself with a pussy willow 50 times facing North.

Amen

382 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:16:00pm
(I'm not apologizing for the Holocaust since that was the work of secular National Socialists. Remember, nearly three million Christians were also murdered by Hilter for the unwillingness to bow the knee to him).

The Roman Catholic church laid the groundwork for the Holocaust.

383 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:17:50pm

#150 Moishe Pipick
Hmm. No Jews are going to stand up to some of the valorizing of the Crusades that's going on here?

That's pathetic and suggests real ignorance. At least I hope it's ignorance...i.e. I hope it's not fear or self-loathing that's keeping you all so quiet.


Sshhh...

Don't confuse anyone here with facts.

Besides they'll just say that the Jews murdered by the Crusaders were what we politely call today, unavoidable collateral damage.

You know, like when you're an illiterate Templar riding across Europe to Jerusalem to kill the Muslims and make the city Christian, it's hard to avoid killing every Jew you meet on the way because, well, they do sort of look alike with those beards and all.

Think of it as a kind of medieval laser-guided bomb that went a bit off target and razed a synagogue.

No harm, no foul!

384 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:19:00pm

Ninetails: I haven't read new book YET. Heres what I do know. WHen nobody or practically nobody knew about or cared about what Loftus said..he was able to say it like he experienced it. NOW...its a different situation. I feel that might have been some "pressure" on Loftus cause he has become so well known ...pressure to "moderate" his views. Just supposing. I wonder if this is happening. Seen it before with other people.

Heres how I read Lotus's book. I read it a while..get VERY UPSET..and stop and put it actually down. THen a while later when I thought I could stand hearing what he was saying Id pick it up again and start reading.

What I learned in that book about killed me. It hurt me. So much I didn't know. I'm sorry to learn some of the facts I did learn then.

You read the new one for me. I dont think I could stand hearing anymore about people I THOUGHT were our friends and werent...

385 Bubble Girl  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:19:39pm

Q @382

The Roman Catholic church laid the groundwork for the Holocaust.

Should I be apologizing to you...since I am Catholic...

386 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:20:41pm
387 Killian Bundy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:21:04pm

Unilever Bestfoods should apologize for Marmite!


/Mister Yuck

388 vickie  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:21:21pm

Naintails: I read your post too fast. Do that sometimes. I dont know if there has been an update. Anything on Amazon about it? Might say that he has updated it. OR not.

389 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:23:20pm

#377 Moishe Pipick

I'm just an oversensitive fool correct?

Correct.

390 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:24:16pm

BG (#385):

Should I be apologizing to you...since I am Catholic...

Not at all. No one is personally responsible for what's happened before their birth.

What's needed -- for everyone -- is not an apology but a clear-eyed acknowledgement of historical facts, without any whitewash, however politically expedient it may seem at the moment.

391 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:25:03pm

#383 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo


Maybe you need to scroll back up and re read
#380 Hankmeister

There are none of us who without feet of clay.

392 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:25:54pm

"#367 coulterclone  3/17/2005 04:51PM PST
 
"I've been catching up on the thread...Moishe Pipick..you are just a dumb asshole with some sort of weird personal issues that you can't deal with so you blame everyone else for your problems...wow, you ARE a Pali troll. APOLOGIZE!"

Actually, what I'm arguing is that many Christians have such "personal issues" that are hard for them to "deal with". Then they blame me for these "problems" in their religious history relative to the Jews. Boasting about real Islamic attrocities doesn't really change things. Fact is, if you were a Jew in the Middle Ages you'd prefer to live in Muslim Spain rather than France, Germany, Italy or England. (Even though things in Spain would hardly be ideal.)

So, please tell me: What do you think are my "personal issues"? Please elaborate...I'm dying to hear what you think they are.

And I'm a "Pali troll" huh? Why not just call me a Nazi, you latent antisemite?

393 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:26:58pm
394 saywhat?  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:27:19pm

Apologise for crusades? Aw, hell no!

OT

CAIR Seeks Clarification, Apology from National Review

CAIR's request came in response to a complaint from a member of the National Review's e-mail list who received a message promoting an apparently self-published book that, according to the magazine, is a "guide into the dark mind of (the Prophet) Mohammed." The National Review's review of the book states: "(The author) explains why Mohammed couldn't possibly be a true prophet, and reveals the true sources of his 'revelations.'"

It quotes the author as claiming: "Mohammed posed as the apostle of God...while his life is marked by innumerable marriages; and great licentiousness, deeds of rapine, warfare, conquests, unmerciful butcheries, all the time invoking God's holy name to sanction his evil deeds."

According to the National Review, the book shows how "Mohammed again and again justified his rapine and licentiousness with new 'divine revelations.'"

"This anti-Muslim screed is the literary equivalent of 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' and should not be promoted by a publication that has any sense of decency," said CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper. "The National Review must clarify its position on Islamophobic hate speech and offer a public apology for promoting a book that so viciously attacks the faith of one-fifth of the world's population."

Hooper said anti-Muslim rhetoric often leads to discrimination and even violence.

I doubt there is anything incorrect in the Nat'l Review piece.

395 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:28:01pm

#382 Q

The Roman Catholic church laid the groundwork for the Holocaust.

'splain.

396 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:28:59pm
Ohh that is good...Where can I find this, so the next time some Christian hating Jew brings up the crimes of Christians...I can play that game too, rake up the past every chance I get...

Just say "filthy Christ-killer" and be done with it.

397 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:32:34pm

E2m (#395):>

'splain.

Gladly.

398 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:33:24pm

#371 Earth2moonbat

We own the latest from MS in perpetuity as long as we maintain our agreement with them. (I specialize in MS licensing). Then again, when ever they get the itch to screw us all more, they'll change the rules.

399 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:34:49pm

#391 quark2

Maybe you need to scroll back up and re read
#380 Hankmeister

There are none of us who without feet of clay.


You're comparing a dispute between Jews (which is what the fight between Jews who rejected Jesus as the Messiah and Jews who believed in him) to the Crusades, the Inquistion and the Holocaust?

Well alrighty then...

/rolls eyes

400 Heraclius  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:35:04pm

What's with all these jews supporting the crusades? Seriously, so many jews were killed (including all the jewish residents of jerusalem) and many more along the way. You guys have a very fucked up view of history. Ask your rabbi about what he thinks of the crusades some time.

401 westoner  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:35:34pm

I wonder, will Al-Azhar University be demanding an apology from Mongolia for the invasions of the 13th century and for Hulagu, grandson of Genghis, for his destruction of the Abbasid caliphate, the destruction of the Ayyubid states in Syria and the Mamluk state in Egypt?

Or is this just another exercise in honky bashing?

402 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:36:39pm
403 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:37:12pm

#380 Hankmeister  3/17/2005 05:11PM PST
 
"Moishe Pipick, don't be so self-righteous. You're falling into the same pattern of hatred that the Islamofascists are trying to foster by their stupid demands for an apology."

I'm not self-righteous. I don't want or need an apology. I'm just stating unacknowledged, real issues that many people seem incapable of dealing with dispassionately (And it's pissing me off.). And for you to bring abortion into this, well, that is ironically, genuinely self-righteous and irrelevant in my opinion.

404 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:37:30pm

Charles

There is a cleanup on aisle 396.


Q...we don't need anyone starting more intercine warfare on Charles' threads. Please stop.

405 JollyFatMan  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:37:46pm

Amazing that they would ask for such a thing.

For those that want a history lesson, the Crusades were a direct response to military expansionism and atrocities committed by the Muslims.

Muslim history books are replete with 'we conquered this land and everybody converted to Islam as if by magic' . Yea right. You mean the ones you let live because they were forced to convert is more like it.

Has anybody noticed that Islam is only a majority religion in areas thet it has conquered and forced conversions directly? Probably not.

They should apologize instead.


JFM

406 Bubble Girl  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:37:51pm

Earth2Moonbat @ 395

Hey Earth... Happy St. Pat's Day...

/Raises Green Beer... before going back to ER to finish shift...

407 Bubble Girl  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:39:24pm

Quark2

Happy St. Pat's Day, Lassie...

May the wind always be at your back...

BG - cheers!

408 J. Lichty  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:40:03pm

#394 saywhat:

"This anti-Muslim screed is the literary equivalent of 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' and should not be promoted by a publication that has any sense of decency," said CAIR

Does anyone else see the flaw in this logic?

Is CAIR actually criticizing the POEZ?

I thought that the POEZ was second only to mein kamph and the holy koran in its adherence to the truth. Boy, next you will see CAIR criticize Arafat.

409 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:40:29pm

#384 vickie 3/17/2005 05:19PM PST
Vickie
I've only started reading Loftus' book - i'm in the middle of six others :-)
What i noted, so far, though, was just how much credence was given to two brits in shaping western policies...now, i'm no historian, but, i find it kind of hard to believe that these two had so much influence/power...again, i haven't read that far into the book - about 30-40 pages which, given the size of the book isn't miniscule - but, i'm reading with a grain of salt right now...

410 Heraclius  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:40:53pm

The crusaders got their asses kicked, deal with it. The crusades are over and these stupid egyptian fucktards are asking for an apology. The people here who are calling for another crusade and people denying the massacres of jews are almost as dumb as those egyptian fucktards. And i'd like to point out, the crusades weren't just directed at the holy land, the europeans also take many parts of syria and lebanon that were never part of the "holy land" and formed separate crusader states out of these lands.

411 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:41:11pm

#402 American Infidel  3/17/2005 05:36PM PST

"Moishe Pipick comes on ugly, and does the work of moslems..."

"Divide and conquer, no better way to get the ugly to come to the forefront between Jews & Christians then mentioning the Crusades..."

Yes. Do not trust the Jews. We (the unassimilated ones) will divide you. We are agents of foreign powers. Jwe are just "ugly". I don't know how else to describe it.

412 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:41:12pm

#404 quark2
Charles

There is a cleanup on aisle 396.


Q...we don't need anyone starting more intercine warfare on Charles' threads. Please stop.


Yes!

Purge the heretic!

We must all pretend to be in total agreement with each other at all times!

And any Jew who doesn't go with the flow...

Well, remember the Crusades?

413 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:42:48pm

quark2 (#404):

I may stop, but I will not aplogize for what I wrote. AI's unmistakable glee at finally having something to stick to those arrogant Jews did rub me the wrong way. Intensely.

414 Lyana  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:43:25pm

#374 quark2

Good! Nothing special - just google.

415 John Schneider  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:44:35pm

As a Catholic(albeit, not a very good one), I find myself at odds with many of my Catholic brethren over the Church's role in anti-Semitism and its evil aftermath, the Holocaust. It's interesting that many of the Catholic faith refuse to acknowledge that Christ himself (whether one believes him to be the Messiah or not) was a Jew. The followers of Christ somehow lost their way, choosing to label their forefathers as "Christkillers" and other filthy epithets.

I never understood why it is that these "good" Catholics can't figure out that the Jewish heritage is OUR heritage, and though we as Catholics may be ignorant of much of Judaism(as I freely admit to), we have to acknowledge that this is where WE came from. Period.

416 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:45:35pm

@399 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo

For someone who has been posting here for a very long time Craig, you're showing a rather nasty side.

I think I put it correctly when I posted that we all have feet of clay. Or did you not see/read or ignore that part of my post?

Of course you can tag/play along with the destructiveness of the troll if you so desire, and continue this until it turns into a uncontrolled hate fest of people who have always gotten along despite their differences.

I'm tired of having someone crush into my face the sins of my forefathers that I have recognized and worked to overcome. Instead of acting like an arrogant goat ramming its head into everyone enflaming them.
We are none of us perfect, nor will none of us ever be. But we can emulate the ones who are higher up in an effort to be righteous.
We will sinners all...and we struggle with this every day.
But when someone comes along and redundantly repeats we are losers and nothing we can do can undo that ...we are losers...he needs to shut the hell up.

417 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:45:51pm

"#404 quark2  3/17/2005 05:37PM PST
 
Charles

There is a cleanup on aisle 396"

Yes, erase the evidence. The Crusades were a noble Christian enterprise and a Christian that supports Israel and hates Islam can't possibly be antisemitic.

418 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:46:40pm

#392 Moishe Pipick

[Fact is, if you were a Jew in the Middle Ages you'd prefer to live in Muslim Spain rather than France, Germany, Italy or England. (Even though things in Spain would hardly be ideal.)]

I have to agree with you on that. Jews have been treated like shit throughout European history. The old ruse of welcoming Jews then relieving them of their possessions and exiling them, pogroms, the Shoa etc.

My point is that it was not for valid religious reasons, but rather, for gain. (It took a lot of gold to run the feudal system.)

Most "nobles" were unable to read or do math, so they hired a lot of foreigners to do the work for them.

I read the history of the Jews. I was disgusted so badly that I could only read an hour or so each day. It was truely an eye opener. It also made me an ardent Zionist and supporter of Israel.

I think Q is on the right track. We all need to acknoledge the past, but keep focus on the present and future.

419 Bubble Girl  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:50:57pm

Quark2

I'm with you... Life is too fucking short to pull this kind of bullshit... today we had three DOA's, two of them, little children... I don't ask people's religion when I treat them for everything under the sun... to hold this kind of centuries old Quid Pro Quo Who Did What... doesn't add up to anything... other than Supreme Bitching...

420 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:52:13pm
421 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:53:19pm

#397 Q

It's hard to get any details from a book link like that, but from what I understand, the thrust of the book is controversial among people who know this stuff (Medved, for example) better than I. My take on this is that the pope may or may not have had a role in feeding the anti-semitic climate in the '30s, but it's hard to imagine the outcome being any different regardless of the activities of the pope or the church.

Nazism (national socialism) is simply marxism cross-bred with nationalism. The holocaust was as much driven by the central planning instinct of the authoratarians in charge as is was by the nationalist/racist tendancies. Once they started accepting the idea that the state can and should manage society, the rest was inevitable. The killing started when they concluded that they were beyond the optimum population (sound familiar?). The first to go were not the Jews, they were the disabled. The Jews weren't far down on the list, because the Fuhrer deemed them undesirable, but the real driving force was "rationalizing" society and the economy. If they thought that there was a "rational" use for the Jews, they would have been "used".

Anti-semitism is but one element in the holocaust, and it may not even be the most critical element. The central planning paridigm and the idea that nothing should stop the persuit of utopia are at least as prominent, if not more. Against this madness, the pope is powerless.

BTW- I wish I could remember, but one of the Israeli prime ministers (Meir? Begin?) formally noted (thanked) pope Pius for the help given to the Jews in WWII. I suspect that that book is grassy knoll stuff.

422 Lazarus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:55:08pm

#373 Aisha

Honor killing to follow?

423 doubledip  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:56:13pm

Did Mehmet Ali Agca ever apologize for shooting and wounding Pope JP2? Never mind that the pope forgave him anyway and that Agca was pardoned by Italy's president in 2000.

Now Agca appears to scheduled for release by Turkey sometime this year.

"To me [the pope] was the incarnation of all that is capitalism." ---Mehmet Ali Agca
424 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:56:15pm

#422 Lazarus

They'd have to catch her first, and seeing she is older than 9 and still a virgin, I'd say she can outrun 'em all!

425 montanapatriot  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:56:33pm

Cheers for Eleanor, Louis, and Raymond... !

426 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:57:43pm

#412 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo

You are totally out of control.

If I have offended you I apologize, for that was not my intent.
If you have been reading the threads for the past few days this has been vitriol has been posted over and over. And no matter how it has been presented in debate it just gets uglier.

The Jews have been persecuted for 2000 years. Everywhere they go. That is a fact. Many times, hundreds of times over, it was those who have labeled themselves christian/catholic, as well as other religious groups who have persecuted them. That is historical fact. But what is not fact is that Jesus himself ever established the precepts of this behaviour. Jesus came first to save His own people the Jews, and then the gentiles. The Jews did NOT kill/murder Jesus. He gave His life willingly on the Cross. He said so himself on the cross. But it seems that a good majority of folks just want to dismiss or ignore this fact.

This is the last I am going to post on this. But if the bunch of you insist on turning this into another intercine flame war, I hope Charles boots the bunch of you. We're just now getting over one the worst ones I've ever witnessed at LGF, we don't need another one.

427 mojo_the_migo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 3:59:07pm

Saw a PBS special in my Poli sci class. Main Points by movie and professor.

The islamic conquest was very tame and tolerant compared to other conquests, most converted willingly due to law and order that the conquest brough with it. Their proof of point was how fast they were able to take over and convert.

The Crusades were barberouse raiders with little to no justification for what they were doing.

Even after the crusades, the expansion on European land wasn't as nearly as bad as what we did in the crusades.

I don't believe the crusades were a totaly defensive war, but I don't believe islamic forces were as sweat and innocent as was presented in class. In defense of my liberal professor, he is a fair guy. Just a wee bit off in this case.

428 Orson Buggy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:00:17pm

Day is done. G'night all. Try not to flame each other to death, we need each other in the days ahead.

429 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:01:11pm

#427 mojo_the_migo

Saw a PBS special in my Poli sci class. Main Points by movie and professor.

You forgot the /sarc tag, right?

430 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:03:06pm

This thread is getting off track!
While it is very important never, ever to forget the past or allow anyone else to rewrite it, it is unfair to hold a present-day Christian guilty of the Crusades, the Holocaust, the Inquisition or anything else - unless he be a fool and actually would support such actions occuring again - then, at least in my book, that person wouldn't be a Christian...what is very gratifying to see is how people of faith are returning to their roots - Christians are returning to the teachings of Jesus - not in any fundamentalist order or rules or beliefs soaked in old-wives' tails about those evil Jews - but people who want to live the words Jesus spoke and do good.

American Infidel:
Please enlighten us - what did the Jews do in history that caused death, starvation, and any other suffering upon another tribe of people?

431 Lazarus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:04:21pm

#424 Orson Buggy

I hope so. I would really miss Aisha's penetrating insight into the smelly devolution of the "Arab street". May it flow with the fleetness of Aisha's feet instead of the blood of the kuffir for a change...

432 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:04:48pm

AI (#420):

Let the games begin...

Not interested, hon.

433 Cognosus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:04:51pm

#427

A video on the Crusades in a Political Science class?

"And you see, class, how Bushwin successfully used his bishop, Carlus Rovius, to keep down the peaceful, innocent Muslims -- until, of course, the great hero Moore'adin challenged the web of lies and drove back the capitalist Italian merchants!"

434 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:06:30pm
435 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:06:36pm

"You, Craig, Moishe and several others (at other times) are quite gleeful in being arrogant 'we never did anything bad' Jews...Rubs me the wrong way too, intensley."

"As I said, two can play that game...Let the games begin..."

It's arrogant to simply point out mass murder and pograms when non-Jews make comments that whitewash, if not glorify the Crusades? And to speculate on the underlying cause of certain individuals discomfort with such material is also off-limits. OK, interesting. But you imply that our whining and sense of eternal victimhood make us "arrogant"? (Wow I'd never though of that before, at least before I went to JewWatch.) Fact is, if Charles were a Jew he never would have posted this topic with "Tigerhawk's" smug call for an apology. He would have thought twice. Or is that taboo to mention?

436 underground  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:07:29pm

377 Moishe

Dont take on so, you are projecting!

I was talking about muslim fundy's not Hebrew tribes

What the hell is JewWatch anyway?

You have got to cool off a bit.

437 montanapatriot  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:07:58pm

Apologize? Sickening, revolting CRAP, aided and abetted by the American left. May they drown in their own vomit!

438 quark2  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:09:53pm

#419 Bubble Girl

OH gosh! I'm so sorry to hear that! **hugs**

439 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:10:35pm

427 mojo_the_migo 3/17/2005 05:59PM PST
Sounds like you saw the CAIR-produced PC version of the Spread of Islam...Islam was spread by the sword...pure and simple. How did they describe the raising of churches and their replacement with mosques - a peaceful event?

440 mojo_the_migo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:10:42pm

429 Earth2 and 433 cog

Yeah, forgot how bias PBS is. I try to stay moderate on the crusades, you have a lot of primitive screw heads that kill because you look at them wrong. Thats humanity at that time. Again, my professor is a decent guy though. The video would be far more bias then him.

441 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:11:28pm

#416 quark2
#399 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo
For someone who has been posting here for a very long time Craig, you're showing a rather nasty side.


I tend to get a little peeved when I stumble across a thread that's filled with glee about an enterprise such as the Crusades, which went way beyond a defensive action against the spread of Islam in Europe and ultimately became a war of imperialist conquest that spread beyond Europe's borders and involved indiscriminate wholesale slaughter of non-Christians, including women and children.

Top that off with one or two posters suggesting that the Jews who don't see the Crusades as such a noble enterprise, as say World War 2, should get their heads down, keep their mouths shut, and just go with the flow (or else!) and I get downright pissed off.

You spoke earlier about Jewish persecution of the early Christians. Well, you'll never hear me make excuses for religionists who use murder and repression in the name of protecting their faith, regardless of their religion and whether they did it two-thousand years ago or yesterday.

Two wrongs don't add up to a right.

442 Pitiricus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:12:37pm

#427

This is the islamic view, that they "persuaded" others... Of course 0they forget to mention the sword and oppression...BS!

I want an apology from Islam for foisting a false pedophile prophet and his poisonous message of hatred on the world... A good world would be one without Islam!

443 Pitiricus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:14:06pm

#385:

no, the Pope did it for you... :-)

444 Q  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:15:14pm

E2m (#421):

The origins of the national socialism are not the issue here. The gist of the matter is that nazi Jew-hatred did not arise out of thin air, and the European populations did not magically turn into Jew-haters overnight. The soil was more than ready. And it was made so in small part by the efforts of the RCC.

During the course of the 19th century, the "old", religious, Jew-hatred (which could be escaped through baptism) got gradually transformed into a "new", racist one (from which there was no escape). RCC was one of the main moving forces (if not THE force) of that transformation.

That is not to say that the Protestant, let alone the Orthodox, Christianity was much better. Feet of clay, indeed.

445 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:15:41pm

#430 ninetails
American Infidel:
Please enlighten us - what did the Jews do in history that caused death, starvation, and any other suffering upon another tribe of people?


Ummm...

Have you ever read the Book of Joshua?

Whatever happened to Amalek, anyway? I haven't seen them around in a while...

446 Pitiricus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:15:42pm

#441:

you better read the real history of the crusades, not the bowdlerized version of it...

It was defensive! Islam as usual wanted to conquer the world... It had to be stopped... The crusades in the East didn't succeed, but the reconquista and the crusades of the Russians did...

447 kiwiviv  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:16:13pm

I started reading this thread and it was so funny it brightened my day. ...

By the end, however, I feel like killing myself with all this bickering...

I want an apology from the Pope...or someone...

448 Pitiricus  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:18:22pm

From [Link: www.crisismagazine.com...]

"Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics. They are supposed to have been the epitome of self-righteousness and intolerance, a black stain on the history of the Catholic Church in particular and Western civilization in general. A breed of proto-imperialists, the Crusaders introduced Western aggression to the peaceful Middle East and then deformed the enlightened Muslim culture, leaving it in ruins. For variations on this theme, one need not look far. See, for example, Steven Runciman’s famous three-volume epic, History of the Crusades, or the BBC/A&E documentary, The Crusades, hosted by Terry Jones. Both are terrible history yet wonderfully entertaining.

So what is the truth about the Crusades? Scholars are still working some of that out. But much can already be said with certainty. For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.

Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.

That is what gave birth to the Crusades. They were not the brainchild of an ambitious pope or rapacious knights but a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be subsumed by Islam. The Crusades were that defense..."

449 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:18:26pm

381 Bubble Girl 3/17/2005 05:15PM PST

I think the punishment b'fits the flogging going on here! :-)

Time to get back to the original subject of this thread, no?

American Infidel:
I have no intention of getting into an argument with you either. I was just curious not having known those events in history when Hellenized Jews persecuted other Jews (early Christians). But, then, those 'Hellenzed Jews' were just that - Hellenized...they were about as Jewish as your average moonbat leftist socialist is...

Anyway - that was history. Like i said in a previous past it is always good to know history - all history - and then move on.

450 mojo_the_migo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:18:53pm

439, they explained massive conversion on that there was a great lack of law and order due to colapse of the Roman empire, there was a power vacuum.

They said they let churches stand for the most part. They mentioned that one jerk king burned down the church of the Holy Sepulcher (SPELLING?!) and the church used him as a skape goat. The king that followed rebuilt it for the Christians.

451 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:24:46pm

445 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo 3/17/2005 06:15PM PST

Whatever happened to Amalek, anyway? I haven't seen them around in a while

Could be a neighbor...all of the ancient tribes that were either dispersed or occupied by invading armies melded into other cultures...except for the Copts and the Jews - if anyone knows of any others, please speak up!

452 coulterclone  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:25:08pm

AYe yi yi! Looocy! I go away for an hour and see what happens? Moishe's gone splody on us all. If you don't agree with it, it yells, "Anti-Semite!" Kinda the way Al Sharpton yells "Racist!".

Example: #392

And I'm a "Pali troll" huh? Why not just call me a Nazi, you latent antisemite?

See? And latent? LATENT? Au contraire! I hate EVERY ethnic group equally and loudly and proudly.

And Moishe, you asked...

So, please tell me: What do you think are my "personal issues"? Please elaborate...I'm dying to hear what you think they are.

Here is your answer,, #411

Yes. Do not trust the Jews. We (the unassimilated ones) will divide you. We are agents of foreign powers. Jwe are just "ugly". I don't know how else to describe it.

See? Self-loathing. Yep. The most personal of personal issues. Anti-Semitic Jew...LATENT self-loathing anti-semitic Jew.

I suggest that you become Irish. Lots of self-loathing and some really fantastic guilt to go with it. And the morning after beer buzz is really good. While YOU are pissing and moaning about how things haven't been good for your people since they planted themselves in Spain in the 12th century, the Irish sing praises to the good things in life:

A long time ago, way back in history, when all there was to drink was nothin but cups of tea.
Along came a man by the name of Charlie Mops,
and he invented a wonderful drink and he made it out of hops.He must have been an admiral a sultan or a king,
and to his praises we shall always sing.
Look what he has done for us he's filled us up with cheer!
Lord bless Charlie Mops, the man who invented beer

And I will NOT apologize to ANYONE for injecting Irish content here.

Happy St. Patrick's Day to everyone...even self-loathing Jews.

And here's raising a glass to Charles with many thanks! Hear hear!

453 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:25:09pm
454 coulterclone  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:26:01pm

AYe yi yi! Looocy! I go away for an hour and see what happens? Moishe's gone splody on us all. If you don't agree with it, it yells, "Anti-Semite!" Kinda the way Al Sharpton yells "Racist!".

Example: #392

And I'm a "Pali troll" huh? Why not just call me a Nazi, you latent antisemite?

See? And latent? LATENT? Au contraire! I hate EVERY ethnic group equally and loudly and proudly.

And Moishe, you asked...

So, please tell me: What do you think are my "personal issues"? Please elaborate...I'm dying to hear what you think they are.

Here is your answer,, #411

Yes. Do not trust the Jews. We (the unassimilated ones) will divide you. We are agents of foreign powers. Jwe are just "ugly". I don't know how else to describe it.

See? Self-loathing. Yep. The most personal of personal issues. Anti-Semitic Jew...LATENT self-loathing anti-semitic Jew.

I suggest that you become Irish. Lots of self-loathing and some really fantastic guilt to go with it. And the morning after beer buzz is really good. While YOU are pissing and moaning about how things haven't been good for your people since they planted themselves in Spain in the 12th century, the Irish sing praises to the good things in life:

A long time ago, way back in history, when all there was to drink was nothin but cups of tea.
Along came a man by the name of Charlie Mops,
and he invented a wonderful drink and he made it out of hops.

He must have been an admiral a sultan or a king,
and to his praises we shall always sing.
Look what he has done for us he's filled us up with cheer!
Lord bless Charlie Mops, the man who invented beer

And I will NOT apologize to ANYONE for injecting Irish content here.

Happy St. Patrick's Day to everyone...even self-loathing Jews.

And here's raising a glass to Charles with many thanks! Hear hear!

455 coulterclone  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:26:46pm

YIKES! I posted twice...sorry...too much beer! Night all!

456 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:27:39pm

#444 Q

If you add socialist/secularist to the list, we are in agreement.

457 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:29:23pm

453 American Infidel 3/17/2005 06:25PM PST
accepted. we all get raw sometimes.

458 American Infidel[deleted]  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:31:24pm
459 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:38:17pm

458 American Infidel 3/17/2005 06:31PM PST
I hear ya!

460 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:38:48pm

#451 ninetails
445 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo 3/17/2005 06:15PM PST
Whatever happened to Amalek, anyway? I haven't seen them around in a while

Could be a neighbor...all of the ancient tribes that were either dispersed or occupied by invading armies melded into other cultures...except for the Copts and the Jews - if anyone knows of any others, please speak up!


I was being facetious. Of course there are survivors of every massacre, so you're probably right, the ancestors of Canaanites and Jebusites are still around but living under different tribal and clan names.

The point is: The Book of Joshua records many massacres committed by Jews during the initial conquest of the land:

Take for example this little ditty:

8:24 It happened, when Israel had made an end of killing all the inhabitants of Ai in the field, in the wilderness in which they pursued them, and they had all fallen by the edge of the sword, until they were consumed, that all Israel returned to Ai, and struck it with the edge of the sword. 8:25 All that fell that day, both of men and women, were twelve thousand, even all the men of Ai. 8:26 For Joshua didn’t draw back his hand, with which he stretched out the javelin, until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai. 8:27 Only the livestock and the spoil of that city Israel took for prey to themselves, according to the word of Yahweh which he commanded Joshua.

I don't know any other way to describe this but as a wholesale slaughter of an entire city followed by looting.

461 kiwiviv  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:40:28pm

I'm still depressed

462 hutchrun  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:41:05pm

i want the bastards to apologize and beg forgiveness for the atrocities on Sikhs.

463 kiwiviv  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:41:10pm

You guys at LGF are usually funny - you've stopped being funny

464 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:43:12pm

#454 coulterclone  3/17/2005 06:26PM PST

"See? Self-loathing. Yep. The most personal of personal issues. Anti-Semitic Jew...LATENT self-loathing anti-semitic Jew."

I was being sarcastic. It was obvious in context. Unless you are a moron.

"See? And latent? LATENT? Au contraire! I hate EVERY ethnic group equally and loudly and proudly."

But I'll take this at face value. The part where you seem entirely off balance and insane, and the part where you admit to being a bigot.

"Moishe's gone splody on us all.'

Considering that I am a Jew who actually has relatives that have been killed or injured by Palestinian terrorists, these persistent references to me as a "Pali" or "Splodey" are not only ridiculous, but somewhat comparable to the way Arabs call Israelis "Nazis". They do this because they are antisemtic and want to deflect attention from the real issues. But actually, I don't think you even understand what the issues are. I honestly think you're just quite stupid.

Good night.

465 hutchrun  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:46:50pm

#462...contd

I mean the mossies should apologize and beg forgiveness for the atrocities on the Sikhs, Hindus etc.

466 Beagle  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:48:24pm

#441

I tend to get a little peeved when I stumble across a thread that's filled with glee about an enterprise such as the Crusades, which went way beyond a defensive action against the spread of Islam in Europe and ultimately became a war of imperialist conquest that spread beyond Europe's borders and involved indiscriminate wholesale slaughter of non-Christians, including women and children.


I'll say this one last time. The largest mass killings of any crusade involved as many Catholics as it did anyone else. Beziers (sorry, no accent mark) is up there with the fire-bombing of Tokyo by medieval standards.

This is where the Frenchy Arnaud said (there is some debate whether anyone said it, but whatever):

"Kill them all, God will know his own."

This was a case of the French slaughtering the southern French, Catholics and Cathars all together. I wish people would really study the Crusades. Two of the major actions in the Crusades involved Christians attacking other Christians. Beziers in the Albigensian Crusade is one, the sack of Constantinople is the other.

Overall, by far, the bloodiest of any crusade was the Albigensian Crusade. It lasted decades, created the modern boundaries of France, jump-started the Inquisition, destroyed respect for feudal institutions, but especially the Catholic Church. Alleged heretics were burned, even dug out of their graves and burned, en masse.

The bright side, if there can be a bright side to such brutality, is that the Catholic Church never regained the power it had under Innocent III. The Inquisition followed, but the power of the church was never the same.

467 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:50:36pm

Submitted by Mark Fisher, February 16, 2005 at 13:11

Mr. Pipes stated that "historically Christians killed most Jews." This is a very misleading and inaccurate statement, ...

Daniel Pipes replies:

Suffice to say, to justify my assertion, that Muslims did not engage in the sort of pogroms that were common in Christian countries from the Crusades until the 20th century.

DP

[Link: www.danielpipes.org...]

I'll leave it at that too.

MP

468 kiwiviv  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 4:56:45pm
I'll leave it at that too. MP


Yes please Moishe...go to bed...please!

469 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:02:25pm

460 Craig Abu Al-Boo-Boo 3/17/2005 06:38PM PST

Sounds like the history of any nation state...so, why are Jews and Israel always held to a different standard?

470 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:05:36pm

466 Beagle 3/17/2005 06:48PM PST
I've been tempted to purchase a few of the books on the crusades that i'm drawn to at my local book store - but, i'm not sure which ones really tell the true story - can you suggest a few?

471 Smith Space Technologies  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:09:06pm

FUCK YOU you damned Satanic Allah sons of bitches! Mohammed is a homosexual pedophile he bred your daddy just to make a turd out of you!

I will never give an apology for the Crusades of long ago or the modern day Crusades of now.

Defiling and the final destruction of the Kaaba idol is not enough looking down on your Islamic ashes might but burning your Qu'ran to light my marijuana filled bong to smoke over your dead ashes and drink the bong water just to piss on your Islamic ashes would make my day.

The tyranny of Allah and his homosexual whore Mohammed their future punishment of these wicked souls will be unavoidable and intolerable the torments of the lowest hell of fire and brimstone.

~ Ezekiel 22:14 ~ Can thine heart endure, or can thine hands be strong in the days that I shall deal with thee? I the Lord save spoken it, and will do it.

472 Kyriakon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:10:15pm

I know this is going to be unpopular, but the Moslems do deserve apology for the sheer barbarity of the Crusaders. You simply cannot sugarcoat these acts of aggression; these savages, fighting for a supposedly lofty cause, committed unspeakable atrocities. By their own admission, the crusaders slaughtered masses of Jews and Ishmaelites. It was said that these unholy warriors had to wade through rivers of blood in the streets of Jerusalem.

Look at what has been perpetrated in the name of the Christian faith. There is no imaginable justification for this sort of wholesale destruction, and it will forever remain a dark spot in the dismal history of this world. Sadly, this sort of hypocrisy and savageness is common throughout "Christian" history. Massacres, persecutions, burnings, and justifications for slavery abound. Looking to Scripture, we have often contorted God's word into our own dangerous aspirations, perpetrating unspeakable evil as a result. As is written, ""There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of
death".

Our faith has a terrible cultural context, and we will never go beyond it so long as it remains a religion, i.e. a set of personal beliefs regarding God. Instead, we must accept the great truths on God's terms.

If we fail, we are destined to more crusades, more persecutions, and more massacres.

473 ninetails  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:10:20pm

MoishePipick

You're glossing over what the islamists did to the Jews - which is not fair.
During WWII, when the US army moved into Morocco, my father, who was serving in the US Army, noticed that only those 'arabs' whose fez fringe was a different color were being beaten while the police looked on...when he asked why those with the different colored fez fringe were being targeted, the policeman answered 'Juif'...

474 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:16:16pm

#464 Moishe Pipick

My sincere apologies [not kidding around for the topic but I mean this] for not saying something myself earlier about Jews being killed in the Crusades. People were joking around in the topic about the Muslims whining about the Crusades by that time and I just let it go.

It's not a funny subject, really, and I just assumed that those who were saying they supported the Crusades didn't realize that Jews were killed by the Crusaders, too (although the war had nothing to do with Jews.)

I think things got out of hand here.

Sometimes, days go by when there's nothing really funny happening here and the local comedians (as most of us can be at times) don't get the chance to be lighthearted.

I was away from my computer or I would have said something when things got heated for you in particular.

It bothers me a lot when some here can jump so quickly to calling someone else an "it" (even someone who is NOT a moonbat and NOT supporting our enemies' efforts to kill us.)

Calling a Jew a "Pali" or an "it" for a political disagreement is not funny (it's happened to me, too.)

Anyway, I'm sorry I wasn't here for most of this. I would have stood up with you.

Kol tuv,
rightasrain

475 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:24:47pm

RE: Hellenist Jews

They were sort of post-Jews (Jews who admired the Greeks and wanted to be Greek instead of Jewish.)

Hellenist Jewish boys who wanted to take part in the Olympics back then had reverse-circumcisions (I have no idea where they got the extra skin for these plastic surgery operations and I don't want to know.) It was so that the Greeks wouldn't make fun of them for missing their foreskins during the naked Olympic games.

Whatever Hellenist Jews did to anyone else has nothing to do with the Jewish people who remained Jewish.

Greeks seemed incredibly cool to a number of people at the time.

They weren't really that cool, though.

The Jewish people survived Greek influence, thank G-d.

476 Kyriakon  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:32:48pm

#475 rightasrain

The Roman Soranus prescribed the surgical technique known as epispasm to uncircumcise the circumcised. It involved a nasty incision and pulling. I'll leave it at that.

477 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:37:24pm

Oh, I see.

Thank you, Kyriakon.

Especially for leaving it at that. :)

478 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 5:50:17pm

As for the early European Christians - they were pagans and utter barbarians who were taken over by Christian armies. They were primitives (peasants were lucky to know 50 words.)

The upper class had more advantages, but the lower classes were just illiterate wild people who were given to mass murders of Jews upon hearing the stories of how Jesus died. Even if they could have read (which they couldn't), they weren't allowed to see the Christian Bible anyway.

It's not like they were the kinds of G-d-fearing Christians that we have today. They were essentially pagans who had been recruited by the ruling armies to be something other than pagan.

Overall, they were a scary bunch (scarier than Muslims were at the time in many ways, when it came to how they treated Jews.)

It was no picnic for Jews under Muslims either, but Muslims did other sorts of things to Jews (mostly involving stealing from Jews and spitting, etc.) It was not the same situation as Europe.

After the Protestant Reformation and the invention of the printing press, European Christians could read the Christian Bible in their own languages. It made the Christian populations work a lot harder on being literate.

The Jewish people, of course, had been a literate population for thousands of years by then (usually literate in multiple languages.)

Christians changed drastically as the result of being able to read the Bible. Incredibly so. The early Americans were part of this flock of Christians and they were awesome (and also they were obsessed with the Jewish portion of the Christian Bible.)

We owe the early Christian Americans a heck of a lot for bringing the influence of the Jewish Bible into American culture.

By the time the Europeans really started getting sophisticated (and much more literate), they stopped being so religious.

The Enlightened found other reasons to hate Jews, and the Holocaust was mostly a product of that hatred (which was worse than the Christian hatred because the Enlightened excuse for hating Jews made it impossible for Jews to convert away from it.) The Enlightened brought in a 'racial' idea that made converted Jews just as Jewish as Jewish Jews. All Jews were slated to die in this scenario.

There's no real reason to be angry at Christians today for what happened a long time ago. The Christians then were different from today's Christians.

Nowadays, Christians are a huge source of support for Israel, too.

Anyway, just some thoughts on this Thursday night...

479 EE  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:03:22pm

It is true that over the past couple of centuries, the greatest enemies of the Jews, in terms of murder, eviction, and many other persecutions, were Europeans. The Jews should regard that bloody history of murder by Europeans as a European phenomenon, and not as a Christian phenomenon.

The Crusades, the history of pogroms, the Inquisition, the Holocaust, the raids of Chmelnicki, the persecutions in the pale of settlement in Russia, the eviction of Jews from hundreds of cities towns and villages in Europe, that extraordinary brutal belligerent history of Europeans against the Jews did not happen in the New World, but did happen in Europe. Since it was not a New World occurrence, too broad a brush should not be used to describe this.

Take the US for example. There is a different culture here in the US than there is in Europe, and to call those European brutal events as Christian events is to use much too broad a brush in painting what happened.

It is not only grossly inaccurate to do so, it is very stupid, and it is counter-productive.

The past is dead, and it is the future that needs to be safeguarded.

Today, the best friend of the Jewish state is the US. And today, it is post-Christian secular Europe that poses a political threat to Israel. The political threat comes from a Europe that increasingly allies itself with the Arab Muslim enemies of Israel, and that is in a transition state that will become an Islamicized Europe.

480 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:04:03pm

#473

ninetails  3/17/2005 07:10PM PST

"You're glossing over what the islamists did to the Jews - which is not fair."

No I'm not. I'm saying Christans have killed more Jews than Muslims. I'm saying that the Crusades were fundamentally ignoble. I'm saying that if one were a Jew during the Middle Ages it would be safer to live in Muslim Spain than Christian Europe. Argue against these points if you disagree, but don't tell me it is "not fair" to raise them.

481 mich-again  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:24:29pm

478 rightasrain

Thanks for that post. Extremely informative and very well written. I tell my kids that they'll never understand what J* was trying to say unless they know about Jewish history and faith along with the culture he was raised in. Any Christians throughout history who demonized Jews were hijacking his very simple message of peace and brotherhood.

As a born/bred Christian, I always kind of scoff at the whole concept of Catholic or Christian Theology. The message is far too simple to clutter with complicated verbiage and obtuse concepts. Those who try are fools.

482 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:25:38pm

#479 EE

It is true that over the past couple of centuries, the greatest enemies of the Jews, in terms of murder, eviction, and many other persecutions, were Europeans. The Jews should regard that bloody history of murder by Europeans as a European phenomenon, and not as a Christian phenomenon.

Exactly.

Today, the best friend of the Jewish state is the US. And today, it is post-Christian secular Europe that poses a political threat to Israel. The political threat comes from a Europe that increasingly allies itself with the Arab Muslim enemies of Israel, and that is in a transition state that will become an Islamicized Europe.

Very true.

Thank you!

483 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:25:41pm

#479

EE  3/17/2005 08:03PM PST

"It is true that over the past couple of centuries, the greatest enemies of the Jews, in terms of murder, eviction, and many other persecutions, were Europeans. The Jews should regard that bloody history of murder by Europeans as a European phenomenon, and not as a Christian phenomenon.

The Crusades, the history of pogroms, the Inquisition, the Holocaust."

While I agree that there is something fundamentally barbaric about Europeans, that the USA is the safest place for Jews in the world (and I'm sure calling antisemitism a "European" problem and not a Christian one will score you points in this deranged asylum) there is obviously something Christian about European antisemitism.

So, the Crusades and the Inquisition are best understood as primarily "European" phenomena? Do tell...

484 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:27:22pm

#481 mich-again

Thanks very much!

485 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:28:24pm

Well, I see I've missed the party while watching The Apprentice.

Would somebody please teach Moishe Pipick how to use the quote function?

Eeeevil Conservative: I had no idea you had connections to Terri Schiavo -- I've been praying for her every time I think of her. So glad to hear a step in the right direction.

I get so angry when news segments characterize her as a "Right to Die" case. She's trying to live. If that were my daughter, I'd fight as hard as her parents have.

As for the Crusades dustups -- I won't join the fray. Getting tiresome. The Muslims can go f--- themselves.

486 Killian Bundy  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:28:51pm

Can't we all just get along?

/Rodney King

487 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:31:03pm

Peacekeeper

[sigh] Can't we just agree that "The Postman" sucked...

ROFLMAO.

488 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:32:31pm

#483 Moishe Pipick

While I agree that there is something fundamentally barbaric about Europeans, that the USA is the safest place for Jews in the world (and I'm sure calling antisemitism a "European" problem and not a Christian one will score you points in this deranged asylum) there is obviously something Christian about European antisemitism.

Moishe, I see what you're saying, but I think in Europe's case they slid from being former barbaric illiterate pagans who'd been rammed into Christianity into becoming the Enlightened without much of a stay in history as real Christians.

This is why a lot of the early Christian Americans fled to the New World - they wanted to be Christians.

Europe just didn't spend enough time soaking in what it means to be religious with enough intensity to help them be moral when they became Enlightened.

I think this might account for why Europe (even though they were Christian for so long) is totally different from Christian America.

Even though most of our immigrants came from Europe, America had a different play on what it meant to be Christian (religious) and it's made a very big difference, I think.

489 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:38:50pm

Once there was a "Jewish Problem" in Europe. Europeans worried (out loud) what do with this "foreign element". Jews were considered alien, not only because they were non-Christian living in Christian nations...but because Judaism, specifically, was considered by many Christians to be a threat to their project; i.e. Christianity was supposed to usurp Judaism. However Jews stubbornly persisted.

Every European nation in the 30's discussed deportation, conversion, ethnic cleansing and mass murder as possible solutions to this so-called Jewish problem.

The USA hasn't had the same kind of history. Our country has generally been more tolerant of immigrants, outsiders, foreigners. Virulent antisemtism has never been tolerated here in the same way it has in Europe.

However, this does not change the fact that European antisemitism, from the Crusades to the Holocaust, is closely related to the Christian establishment.

490 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:41:02pm

Eeeevil Conservative

Setback for Terri Schiavo being reported at WorldNetDaily. Bill Fails in Senate

491 Albertanator  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:41:46pm

Hey, is this moral equivicating idiot Moishe simply Judith come back in another guise?

Sounds completely familiar to be sure.

492 helloworld  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:41:54pm
I'm sure calling antisemitism a "European" problem and not a Christian one will score you points in this deranged asylum

i've held my tongue this long but i can't stand it anymore. how exactly is antisemitism a "christian" problem?

493 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:42:59pm

#491 Albertanator

He's sure got the same angry furnace going -- He's throwing Christianity into the flames today.

494 JimmyTheClaw  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:43:29pm

ok for fun with the crusades check out firefly studios stronghold crusader. ive been playing it but my monitor blew a gasket and this old 12" one cant get the refresh rate or something so i'm stuck jonesing for mideivel war strategy seriously check the game out the muslim side uses arabic words and taunts even aloha snackbar. now i gotta wait a few weeks before i can get back on the trail to defeat saladin.

now back on topic i always try to apologise for things i have done that were wrong however apologising for something a distant ancestor did or might have done that you had no say in or control of is wrong on sooo many levels.

495 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:44:44pm

#492 helloworld

I wondered the same thing. I've studied the Bible for almost 9 years now, and nowhere have I come across where I'm instructed to kill Jews or even be Anti-semitic.

496 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:45:50pm

#492

helloworld  3/17/2005 08:41PM PST

"i've held my tongue this long but i can't stand it anymore. how exactly is antisemitism a "christian" problem?"

Historically...are you kidding me?

497 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:46:42pm

The BTK killer was a ranking elder in his Christian church -- I guess that makes Christianity guilty of his murders, too.

498 steve miller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:47:07pm

Is that the sounds of "An American Symphony" I hear?

499 helloworld  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:53:57pm
Historically...are you kidding me?

no i'm being dead serious. throughout history the jews were attacked by assyrians, babylonians, greeks, romans (and others i'm prolly missing). all this before christianity even cursed the world with it's presence. then the immense (and NON christian) roman empire was slowly converted to christianity. how many old hatreds and prejudices were left over? chrisitanity went from being a mainly jewish cult to religion of a majority NON jewish empire. where did it's founder, his 12 followers, his mother, or his most famous convert (Saul) ever command or encourage attacks against jews or call for their murders?

500 Albertanator  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:56:02pm

The bottom line is this...When Muslims have slaughtered and killed and enslaved Jews and Christians and others, they have done so on perfect accordance with Islamic teaching...

Mr. Pipick, would you like to challenge me on that assertion?

However, when members of various churches have done horrible things in Christ's name, they have done so against the teachings of the Bible...Tanach and Greek...


Again, Mr. Pipick, no one is denying that people have done horrible things in the name of Christianity...what we are saying is that in Islam and uniquely so, they have the teachings and example of that deranged murderer, Mahound, to back up their actions!


Even the most dishonest moral equivicator cannot compare these 2 ideologies though as we have seen over and over, many try.

501 EE  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:56:44pm

#483 Moishe Pipick
Yes, I don't accept your generalization of them as Christian phenomena, when their focus was in Europe. European Christian phenomena would be more accurate, wouldn't it?
And I wouldn't call Hitler a Christian leader, but he surely was a European leader.
And regarding today's dhimmi Europeans, who exhibit anti-semitic tendencies, and are hostile to the Jewish state: they are post-Christian secularists mainly. They are heading toward an Islamic Europe. There is an alliance between the European Left and radical Islamists in Europe
[Link: www.benadorassociates.com...]
I wouldn't call that a Christian phenomenon, but it is essentially a European phenomenon (even though there are some more isolated echos of this European phenomenon elsewhere in the world).

So Moishe I think that you are missing the forest for the trees. There is a Judeophobic phenomenon in Europe that is, was, and will be. And to characterize it as Christian is to miss the main thing that has been going on, and to paint it with too broad a brush. It is a European phenomenon in my book.

502 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:57:15pm

#489 Moishe

You're right that it's been closely related to the Christian establishment, but the sense of being "alien" has also had a big nationalistic element to it. The Jewish people have always been a nation with the intention of returning to our nation's homeland.

One of the ways that some Jews in Europe tried (in order to be seen as GERMANS, etc.) was to establish the Reform Movement and call the place of worship "The Temple" (as if to say, "See? We don't have a longing for a Temple back in some other homeland. We're GERMANS. Our Temple is right here.")

There were also massive conversions of Jews to Christianity during the 1800s in the last century before the Holocaust. Many of these were done for the opportunities, not for the religious draw of Christianity.

In Israel's Holocaust museum, one of the sets of newspaper clippings from Germany in the 1930s shows a political cartoon with a very handsome man in a nice suit. His handsome face is really a mask, though, and the cartoon shows what's underneath this very handsome mask: An ugly, hook-nosed caricature of a Jew.

The more European Jews looked and acted like Germans (and other Europeans), the more the Europeans hated them for it.

They hated Jews for the ethnicity, not for the Jewish religion.

---

Something else is that even the most NON-religious, pro-nationalistic, and pro-religious reasons for hating Jews has always broken down to the Jewish mission to bring G-d's ideas of morality, conscience, and human civilization to the world.

Europe was a stopover for the Jewish people on the way to bringing American democracy into the world (a clear child of Judaism) and on the way to returning to live near barbarians again, as the Jewish people have always done (except for when living in America.)

All this was going to happen and it's all been about something (the Jewish people's mission.)

Europe may or may not survive at this point, but it's now a big battle between Jewish values (freedom, justice, the preciousness of human life, education, etc.) versus BARBARISM (terrorism, human sacrifice, totalitarianism, etc.)

The final showdown for all this is approaching.

Everything indicates that this is so.

503 TalkinKamel  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 6:58:55pm

I suggest everybody go back and take a look at the article which is the subject of this thread.

The Moslem religious leader, Sayidd Tantawi, calling for this apology from the Pope, has praised homicide bombers (no, I will NOT call them "suicide bombers"!) and has urged Islam to acquire nukes. This is not someone interested in rectifying history's wrongs, or in condemning violence (which he heartily supports, as long as it's perpetrated by his own side.) This is yet another battlefield in the ongoing jihad; one more effort to humiliate the West, and whitewash Islam.

The apology he demands has nothing to do with the Jews who were murdered by Crusaders. If anything, he probably wishes they'd killed more! (Maybe this will be the next thing the Pope will have to apologize for? The Crusaders left too many Jews alive, to create the modern day state of Israel, thereby oppressing poor Moslems?)

Tantawi has praised homicide bombers as martyrs! He doubtless despises Jews, Christians---and everybody else who isn't an adult male Moslem.

He wants apologies? Let him issue a few himself!

I wonder what his reaction would be if the pope said something like "Okay, you can have your apology---but only if you condemn all homicide bombings!"

Something tells me Tantawi wouldn't accept that.

We can't change what happened during the Crusades. We can change what's happening today.

504 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:01:31pm

#503 TalkinKamel

Good points!

505 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:03:14pm

All these old books contain a lot of nasty rhetoric, but if yo think the New Testament is immune:

"For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of you own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out.

They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.
(I Thessalonians 2:14-16)

But who cares about this stuff? it is indisputable that the Church has played a huge role in fostering antisemitic attitudes. Denying that is...antisemitic.

But we don't have to harp on it. Just don't celebrate the Crusades. OK?

506 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:05:29pm

"We can't change what happened during the Crusades. We can change what's happening today."

We can change what happened during the Crusades if we whitewash it, celebrate it.

507 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:05:35pm

#505 Moishe Pipick

But we don't have to harp on it. Just don't celebrate the Crusades. OK?

Sounds like a good idea to me, Moishe.

508 JimmyTheClaw  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:05:46pm

#495 traveler 3/17/2005 08:44PM PST
#492 helloworld

I wondered the same thing. I've studied the Bible for almost 9 years now, and nowhere have I come across where I'm instructed to kill Jews or even be Anti-semitic.

try reading the koran and suhnna its in there not the bible.

ok another crusade thing the christians who studied the muslim texts also found them heretical from a christian pov. craig winn points out the heretical elements in prophet of doom. even though i'm not a biblical scholar or a reverend {raised lutheran} i can see this when ive read the islamic books. think about how muslims cry heresy and blasphemy. christians did the same thing but have moved on because of the printing press and the ability to actually read the bible they discovered a lot of what was being taught was not in accordance with the teachings of jesus. mohammedans on the other hand are doing exactly as their so called prophet did. [yeah i get odd looks when i tell people bin laden is actually a good muslim, and that islam is a religion of peace for muslims only all other faiths are inferior in their creed] ok gtg cartman is on cursing hippies its a repeat of last nights episode.

509 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:06:40pm

#500 Albertanator

Exactly. That's where Moishe's moral equivalency falls flat with me. Christianity does not dictate slaughter -- despite some professed "Christians" engaging in murder or whatever else.

Islam, however, clearly states that slaughter is part of the conversion by the sword.

Very well stated, Albertanator.

510 EE  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:08:27pm

#503 TalkinKamel

We can't change what happened during the Crusades. We can change what's happening today.

That is where I hope the focus will be: on the present and the future.

Good for you for trying to put things in perspective.

511 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:08:33pm

#508 Jimmy the claw

christians did the same thing but have moved on because of the printing press

Good point!

Also, I hate being in the same room with the Koran, but I've seen the passages...and I'll take your word for it.

:)

512 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:10:55pm

"And regarding today's dhimmi Europeans, who exhibit anti-semitic tendencies, and are hostile to the Jewish state: they are post-Christian secularists mainly."

50-60% of Christian Europeans, polled in the mid-eighties (before Islam was really an international issue in the way it is today) agreed with the statement, "Jews are eternally guilty and/or cursed for the murder of Jesus Christ." How very...European.

513 steve miller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:12:19pm

One of the most noticeable features of "Mr. Holland's Opus" is its attention to the woodwinds.

514 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:13:44pm
How very...European.

How very...unenlightened and ignorant of the very faith they mindlessly profess. After the poll, they went back to their secular day.

515 EE  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:14:42pm

#512 Moishe Pipick
And what percentage of Americans would agree with that statement?
Again, I see that you fail to see the difference between the American mind set and that of the Europeans.

516 traveler  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:14:54pm

#513 Steve miller

Don't you think Richard Dreyfuss is getting too old for the sequel if they don't hurry up?

517 steve miller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:19:44pm

Glenn Holland: Playing music is supposed to be fun. It's about heart, it's about feelings, moving people, and something beautiful, and it's not about notes on a page. I can teach you notes on a page, I can't teach you that other stuff.

Sigh.

They just don't make movies like this anymore.

I think in the sequel "Mr. Holland's Extra-special Opus" that they should have him trying to teach Elaine (Barbra Streisand) play the flugelhorn. Laughs ensue as Elaine insists on only playing the left side of every score.

518 JimmyTheClaw  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:20:08pm

jesus had a dying statement "forgive them they know not what they are doing"

mohammed had a dying statement "no religion but mine in this land"


the comparison is telling

also many false prophets will come in his name judge them by the fruit of their tree ok being drunk and cant put my thoughts down coherently so back to lurking

519 steve miller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:26:20pm

Vice Principal Wolters: Have you been to any of the football games this season, Mr. Holland?
Glenn Holland: I can't say that I have, no.
Vice Principal Wolters: Well, Mrs. Jacobs and I feel that there's something missing.
Glenn Holland: Touchdowns?

520 fiery celt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:40:55pm

mojo---

Saw a PBS special in my Poli sci class. Main Points by movie and professor.

The islamic conquest was very tame and tolerant compared to other conquests, most converted willingly due to law and order that the conquest brough with it. Their proof of point was how fast they were able to take over and convert.

The Crusades were barberouse raiders with little to no justification for what they were doing.

Even after the crusades, the expansion on European land wasn't as nearly as bad as what we did in the crusades.

I don't believe the crusades were a totaly defensive war, but I don't believe islamic forces were as sweat and innocent as was presented in class. In defense of my liberal professor, he is a fair guy. Just a wee bit off in this case.

Consider the Source...

PBS...NPR...Ford Foundation...Carnagie Mellon Foundation... MacArthur Foundation... LLL University System...

521 Moishe Pipick  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:44:43pm

#514

traveler  3/17/2005 09:13PM PST

"How very...European."

"How very...unenlightened and ignorant of the very faith they mindlessly profess. After the poll, they went back to their secular day."

You mean during the poll they were acting Christian (by thinking of Jews as Christ-Killers)? And then they reverted back to their regular secular ways? So what you're saying is that all remains of their Christianity (because of their secularism) is their antisemitism. So this antisemitism must be very basic to, or at the core of their Christian identity (if that's all that remains). That is, without even reading the New Testament, one, as a European Christian, just kind of knows, instinctively, emotionally, that one, because a Christian issue is on the table, should behave in an antisemitic manner . It's like a priming effect in psychology.

That's brilliant. You get it. Exactly my point!

522 steve miller  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:47:36pm

Glenn Holland: Which instrument do you think you'd like to play?
Louis Russ: Well, I was kinda thinkin' like... How about electric guitar?
Glenn Holland: Well, this is a marching band. The extension cord will kill us.

523 helloworld  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 7:53:59pm

Moshe

So this antisemitism must be very basic to, or at the core of their Christian identity (if that's all that remains). That is, without even reading the New Testament, one, as a European Christian

that's like blaming the massacre at nanking to buddhism (after all weren't the invading japanese buddhists). if according to you the new testament is considered antisemitic (which you still haven't proved), then so can the tanak. and if you want i can give you verses.

524 logger phd  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 8:03:09pm

I demand an apology from Irish Catholics for their sappy hymns, from American Catholics for their soullessly designed churches, and Mexican Catholics for their tacky sacramentals.

My German ancestors came to America 270 years ago to flee living under oppressive, Catholic France. Then after all that, I convert.

Following Q's cue: "Self, I apologize." "Self, accepted. Have a drink on me."

525 logger phd  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 8:04:16pm

By the way, does this Zafzaf guy have tenure yet?

526 fiery celt  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 8:05:50pm

Again... I reiterate

Islam was born of the slaughter of Jews and Jewish Blood---

What Happened to the Jews of Medina

...and Islam will seek it's final days amongst the slaughter of Jews and of Jewish Blood

"The Day of Resurrection will not arrive until the Moslems make war against the Jews and kill them, and until a Jew hiding behind a rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: 'Oh Moslem, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'" (Sahih Bukhari 004.52.176)

Until the final days Muslims are mandated by their unholy god "allah" persecute, enslave and make war upon all Jews, Christians and pagans...

"The Day of Resurrection will not arrive until the Moslems make war against the Jews and kill them, and until a Jew hiding behind a rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: 'Oh Moslem, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'" (Sahih Bukhari 004.52.176)

Pope Innocent declared war upon Islam after 400 years of continued Muslim conquest ---Assyria, Turkey, Egypt, Palestine, Lebanon, North Africa, Syria, Southern Spain...and Jerusalem.

The Crusades were called upon and began as a defensive war---

If the Crusades and Europe's defensive wars against Islam had not occurred, ...Europe as we know it would have never existed. Neither would have the renaissance and the enlightenment.
The Principles of the Republicanism would have never had been born and United States would have never existed.

The goal of Islam has always been Dar el Islam or a Global Caliphate.
This goal has remained unchanged.

Eventually all Jews (and Christians) will have to be destroyed under Islam--- The so called prophet and his "allah" has decreed this to be so...

527 logger phd  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 8:39:00pm

Hmmm, do any of the old-timers sense deja-vu with this thread? Kinda like a certain movie that came out just over a year ago? The longest thread in LGF history?

Dare we speak its name? ;-)

Okay, enough mischief. Off to bed.

P. S. Still haven't seen the _Postman_ --I avoid movies that amanate suckiness before even watching them (see also: _Titanic_, _Far and Away_, and that movie with Clint Eastwood and the orangutan).

528 MigueldowninMexico  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:07:37pm

Forget it, it's quite impossible to help Israël and its people. The "goyim" here are supporters of Israel, except for the occasional troll. But for the Jews, that is not enough. They will alienate their possible allies by attacking them, mainly those of Christian persuasion, for the Inquisition, the Cruzades, even the Shoa! Fine way of treating your allies. But I'm not surprised in the very least, when I've known personally dozens of Jews who hate Israël, for example; and have heard about thousands more, like the Chomsky kind and many other anti-Jewish Jews. Amazing. Now, if they can't keep a united front (actually, the enemy is inside the house) it's no wonder that they'll lack the dexterity to create bridges with the "goyim". I wish people around will ponder on this.

529 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:15:38pm

#528 MigueldowninMexico

If the only way you support the existence of Israel and the freedom of the Jewish people is when enough Jews kiss your ass sufficiently (to your personal satisfaction), then you're not in favor of the Jewish people being free at all.

Morality is when you want a people's freedom for their own sake, NOT for your own selfish needs.

530 MigueldowninMexico  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:19:21pm

#228
Don't get it huh? Attacking is the way of making friends. Sure. Hope others will get it.

531 MigueldowninMexico  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:20:40pm

That was #529

532 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:23:22pm

#530 MigueldowninMexico

If you can't be moral without demanding ass-kissing for it, then you aren't moral in the first place.

Your friendship means nothing if you demand payment for it.

533 rightasrain  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:30:46pm

Furthermore, if Islamists manage to take down their primary goal (the one democratic nation in the world they would most like to get: Israel), the weaker nations of the world would be even faster targets than Europe.

Everyone would be at risk, including you.

534 Jheka  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 10:42:50pm

Miguel:

You are not the first to predict doom for the Jews for one reason or another. You won't be the last. In over 5,000 years, not one doomsayer has been right. Here is what Mark Twain wrote about the Jews in 1900:

If the statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a nebulous dim puff of star dust lost in the blaze of the Milky Way. Properly the Jew ought hardly to be heard of; but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are also away out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all the ages; and has done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of himself, and be excused for it. The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains.

Since that time we have survived the Holocaust, pogroms and persecution in the Soviet Union and elsewhere, numerous wars with the combined might of the Arab world, hatred by, in turn, the American Right and the American Left and pervasive anti-Semitism virtually everywhere in the world except Israel and parts of New York.

Five thousand years from now, if there are still humans, there will still be Jews.

535 tired  Thu, Mar 17, 2005 11:11:27pm

Two words - agent provocateur. I know why he does it. The question is, why do the rest of you fall for it?

Tired

536 hutchrun  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 12:24:27am
537 Sevoguy  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 12:44:11am

If we give apologies will Muslims vacate lands that have conquered like Constanpinople, parts of Spain and Europe.

One thing I won't apologize for is the Renaissance. Yes we had one and Islam didn't.

You follow a false prophet. Read the bible dude's, your following Satan. Satan sent his false prophet into the world. Do Christians, Jews or Buddists advocate suicide bombings of innocent civilians. Only a Satanic religion would do that.

538 American Infidel[deleted]  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 2:50:30am
539 American Infidel[deleted]  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 2:55:46am
540 Hoosier  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 2:57:37am

Here's your apology:

"In Hoc Signo Vinces"

541 Pitiricus  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 3:40:15am

#528 Miguel...

What does a little antisemite like you do here... I am sure that the muyslim fora are more to your taste... Run there!

542 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 3:46:40am

Gee. The development of this thread was absolutely unpredictable.

#527 logger phd

Hmmm, do any of the old-timers sense deja-vu with this thread?

Charles should just shut down comments on threads with topics like this, and link back to earlier threads where every wound imaginable was previously opened and thoroughly salted. What is to be gained by constant repetition of the exact same arguments over and over again - sometimes within the space of days - is beyond me.

543 EE  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 3:57:18am

#528 Miguel
The anti-semite sees a Jew among his foes, and condemns all Jews -- or as you say, "the Jews".

Sure, the writer who calls himself Moishe Pipick is a politically moronic person. He claims to be Jewish, and maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But how do you jump from that to condemning "the Jews"?
"MP" sounds like a political moron, and from your statements, you give a good impersonation of being an anti-semite.

544 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 3:58:00am

#535

tired  3/18/2005 01:11AM PST

"Two words - agent provocateur. I know why he does it."

So your suggesting that I'm not even a Jew? A real jew would never say such things. Real Jews walk into the gas chambers without protest. I must be some enemy agent, impersonating a Jew to stir up trouble. Or, by making such a claim are you suggesting that a Jew such as I am, is an 'agent provocateur' impersonating...I don't know...a 'patriot' when in fact I'm an enemy of the state? What should we do with such Jews. Are there many? Is there a "Jewish Problem"?

Are you really an antisemite? Or are you just being provocative?

Bottom line: A Jew would never had started this thread. And most of the "real Jews" who frequest this site, despite that many probably imagine themeselves as independent thinkers, are too scared to even offer an opinon lest they "alienate" themselves from their non-Jewish host and "allies." So fuck it, the Crusades were noble, and to question this is anti-Chrisitan, antisemitic, anti-American and pro-Islamist.

Sound familiar? You don't end antisemtism by pointing it out when it's 'comfortable' to do so, poseurs.

Hey Ed, why not give us one of your weather forecasts, we could really use one about now. You know, let's change the subject to something 'important'.

545 Joel  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:00:39am

Considering that the Holy Land was ruled by the Byzantines and was conquered by the RoPMA, the Crusades in reality was an attempt at liberation.

546 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:08:48am

Thom:

"Charles should just shut down comments on threads with topics like this, and link back to earlier threads where every wound imaginable was previously opened and thoroughly salted."

So it's the "thread" that opens ups the wounds and not say, a multimilion dollar film celebrating a notoriously antisemtic passion play, or celebrating the Crusades? OK.


EE:

"MP" sounds like a political moron..."

Now that was out of nowhere.

547 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:12:35am

EE

"Sure, the writer who calls himself Moishe Pipick is a politically moronic person. He claims to be Jewish, and maybe he is, maybe he isn't."

Interesting. Do you often doubt when a person here claims to be a Jew? Or just me? If just me, ask yourself why. You will gain some awareness of your own antisemitism.

548 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:16:29am

#542 Thom

You're right. Deja vu on this one.

And worse -- What if Moishe is a conspiracy theorist?

:)

549 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:17:20am
Do you often doubt when a person here claims to be a Jew? Or just me?

No, just the righteous hostile ones.

550 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:21:49am

#521 Moishe

That's brilliant. You get it. Exactly my point!

I guess it was too nuanced for you: Those people PROFESS Christianity but didn't know the first thing about it.

551 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:22:35am

#549

traveler  3/18/2005 06:17AM PST

"No, just the righteous hostile ones."

I actually think the people defending the Crusdades are the righteous hostile ones. Can't get any more righteous and hostile than the Crusdades...

My tip to you is to avoid the ad hominem smears. Can they be flipped quite easily. Stick to the issues.

552 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:23:03am

I'm no doctor, but I think it's ok for Moishe to take the WHOLE Prozac now.

553 TalkinKamel  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:26:51am

#507 Moishe Pipick

And we can change what happens today if we give this Jew-hating, homicide bomb loving clown the apology he wants---thereby making him seem like a legitimate "religious" leader, (and legitimizing his views as well) and not the Islamofacist he is. This is not a good idea, for Jews, Christians, or anybody else who gets in the way of jihad.

As I said---I'd like to see the pope give him the "Okay, you'll get your apology, but only if you denounce homicide bombing!"

Betcha anything he'd flunk.

554 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:27:37am

#551 Moishe

My tip to you is to avoid the ad hominem smears. Can they be flipped quite easily. Stick to the issues.

My tip to you is to actually read some of the replies. I haven't been debating or defending the Crusades with you.

555 Beagle  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:53:02am

#470 ninetails

I'd use the online Medieval Sourcebook before spending a penny. Here is the relevant section.

If I was going to read only two books on 'the' Crusades I would read Joinville and Villehardouin (available cheap) or The Perfect Heresy on the Albigensian Crusade. I bought TPH for eight bucks in hardcover at Barnes and Noble on a sale table.

556 BabbaZee  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 4:55:10am

Pttthhh!

557 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:07:54am

#553

TalkinKamel  3/18/2005 06:26AM PST

You know what I think this is really all about? One thing I've been called several times, by several posters, is "self-righteous." Considering that this began by me merely asking that Christians acknowledge that celebrating the Crusades as a noble enterprise to halt the spread of Islam, whitewashes history, especially as it relates to Christian antisemtism of that long period, is more than very ironic. It is revealing.

Why did they smear me as "self-righteous"? Obviously because I threaten some people's own claims to self-righteousness. The other theme on this thread has been something like, "There is no explicit antisemitism in the New Testament but there is in the Koran. Therefore I can disparage Islam in any way imaginable, but you can not criticize Christianity *at all* despite the empirical fact that Christians have killed more Jews than any other people, "from the Crusades to the pogroms in Europe in the 20th century." (Interestingly, the antisemitic passage from the New Testament I offered was completely ignored.)

So what we've got is a bunch of truly "self-righteous" people, comfortable saying despicable things about Islam, in response to a fairly constant stream of despicable public comments by Muslims (mostly about Jews and Americans).

And then we have people saying my line of argumentation is not productive (never mind my style for the moment). Well, all I can say to some of our thin-skinned American Christians is: If you want to understand our current enemy, examine your own past. (I t may be that Islam is about 500 years behind Christianity in more ways than one.)

Finally, the amount of overt antisemtism this debate has stirred up is not only alarming, but adds support to my overall position.

558 Beagle  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:10:13am

#470 ninetails

Also, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch has a book on the Crusades coming out within the year. I think we should all buy that to support his good work in tracking and analyzing the jihad daily.

I've got so many books I need to buy to support the people I admire. I'm going to need to place an Amazon order for most of them. Barnes and Noble, though not totally one-sided, tends to ignore some sources it finds inconvenient.

559 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:18:36am

#546 Moishe Pipick

I will grant you the courtesy of acknowledging your post, but I refuse to be drawn into discussion with you.

560 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:22:15am

#426 quark2

But if the bunch of you insist on turning this into another intercine flame war, I hope Charles boots the bunch of you. We're just now getting over one the worst ones I've ever witnessed at LGF, we don't need another one.

I've been avoiding (well, trying to avoid) the comments section lately - which thread are you referring to?

561 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:30:28am
#559 Thom 3/18/2005 07:18AM PST
#546 Moishe Pipick

I will grant you the courtesy of acknowledging your post, but I refuse to be drawn into discussion with you.

Goes for me, too. I won't accept Christianity being characterized by the actions in the Crusades, nor will I accept Moishe's fevered "explanations" of Christianity.

562 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:38:39am

#561 traveler

My problem is with his debate tactics. I won't get sucked in.

563 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:39:08am

Thom:

Thanks for the courstesy.

traveller:

You are an idiot.

564 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:40:07am

#562 Thom

Me, too, on both points.

565 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:40:26am

#563 Moishe Pipick

You are welcome.

566 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:40:32am

Gee, coming from you that's a compliment.

567 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:43:10am

#562

Thom  3/18/2005 07:38AM PST

"My problem is with his debate tactics."

I would claim that my "tactics" are not very different than those tactics used here to criticize Islam in broad strokes.

The problem you have is more likely the subject.

568 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:44:35am

#567

The problem you have is more likely the subject.

Wow! Diagnosing everyone today! Don't you have patients to see, or guest appearances on talk shows this morning?

569 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 5:50:01am

#568

traveler, Do you know why I think you're an idiot? Because rather than argue why my debate tactics are qualitatively different than those commonly found at LGF you launch an ad hominem. That's the kind of thing stupid people do.

570 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:02:13am
The problem you have is more likely the subject.

Exhibit A.

571 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:12:22am

#570

Thom  3/18/2005 08:02AM PST

"Exhibit A."

Thom, I'd rather not argue about arguing but your above comment is simply unfair. If you are going to claim that my debate "style" is offensive in a way that common debate style at LGF is not, it's up to you to say why. Since, you don't say why, it's fair for me to speculate that perhaps you either 1) don't know why, and therefore, it's actually the subject of debate that bothers you (and it is a quite awkward subject) or 2) you do know that it is the subject that is uncomfortable but you choose to attack my rhetorical methods as a means to change the topic of debate.

And if it is my methods that upset you, I think it's your responsibilty to say why. Or just don't say anything.

572 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:15:52am

Moishe

traveler, Do you know why I think you're an idiot? Because rather than argue why my debate tactics are qualitatively different than those commonly found at LGF you launch an ad hominem.

I posted in this thread earlier. You are too interested in your own words to consider the posts of others. That makes you guilty of worshiping your own intellect. You're not here to debate. You're here to preen.

And your hard-on against Christians has lasted more than 4 hours. See a doctor.

573 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:16:38am

Moishe

or maybe "The problem you have is more likely the subject."

574 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:25:20am
Because rather than argue why my debate tactics are qualitatively different than those commonly found at LGF you launch an ad hominem.

Now we're expected to admire and discuss his debate tactics. This guy IS full of himself.

575 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:27:35am

572 traveller

"That makes you guilty of worshiping your own intellect. You're not here to debate. You're here to preen."

I'm the "bad" wrestler, eh? Thing is, this is isn't a fake sport. I'm not here to "preen" I'm here to win, i.e. to be honest and correct. If you want to disagree with what I say, you're going to have to do it in a more interesting way. And since I'm really the only person supporting my side of the argument, I can't be expected to respond to every bad response from those opposed to my point of view. This is a flaw of the medium (and a sad commentary on the state of the Jewish population at LGF). I apologize if I have ignored some of your points, but it's my position that you have ignored more of my own.

576 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:35:17am

#575 Moishe

Nice preening.

577 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:36:14am

traveller:

"Now we're expected to admire and discuss his debate tactics. This guy IS full of himself."

Above I said:

"I'd rather not argue about arguing but your above comment is simply unfair."

Just one smear after another. OK, what *is* motivating you? (Hint: You've accused me of being "arrogant" impressed with my own "intellect", irrationally anti-Christian and using unfair "tactics"...considering the context of this debate, what stereotype might you be trying to articulate?)

578 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:36:52am

Moishe: "Well, enough about me, what do you think about me?"

579 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:39:56am
OK, what *is* motivating you?

You're not going to bill me for this session, are you?

580 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:43:29am

#571 Moishe Pipick

Just in case you think my comments about you are based solely on this thread, rest assured - I've been reading your posts for a long time and your trollishness has been well-noted.

581 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:49:07am

Debate succesfully derailed. You win.

Bye.

582 traveler  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 6:54:33am

Moishe can't brook disagreement with his superior posts and leaves a snarky comment as he exits. What an intellectual giant. /sarc.

583 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 7:18:06am

@575 Moishe Pipick

and a sad commentary on the state of the Jewish population at LGF).

As we have a fairly large Jewish population at LGF, maybe you'd like to leave a personal message to each one of them of your disappointment of them each.

You have spent hours arguing, dissing, insulting and condemning lgfers.
No one here has been celebrating the crusades of ancient middle east. Among us, including me, we have recognized and admitted to the attrocities that happened to the Jews. But you seem to think that they were the only ones who were victimized during this time of violent conflict. The crusaders who dealt in these crimes are long dead, recognized for the monsters they were. Yet you just want to continue condemning that curse which walks the earth now, the believers in Christ.
May you get your wish and we all disappear in a flash, with no trace. That's what I'm praying for. Then you'll have this earth all for yourself, right along with your true enemies.

584 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 7:29:51am

@560 Thom

This thread. We have witnessed one of our own savage himself and then turn on others in his bitterness.
He has lashed out with everything he can possibly hurl in hatefulness including calling the crucifixion anti semitic.

I'll be honest, I think Charles should have killed this thread hours ago, because there is now all kinds of dirty laundry for the left to pick through and use as ammunition

Moishe is so filled with hatred for christianity and christians, I believe he would celebrate the death of us, just like the moslims.

585 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 7:34:16am

quark2:

"No one here has been celebrating the crusades of ancient middle east."

This statement is not true if you start from the top.

"Among us, including me, we have recognized and admitted to the attrocities that happened to the Jews."

Recognizing such attrocities as the unfortunate "collateral damage" of a basically noble enterprise is disingenuous.

"May you get your wish and we all disappear in a flash, with no trace. That's what I'm praying for. Then you'll have this earth all for yourself, right along with your true enemies."

Such bizarre, delusional attributions are, in my opinion, a symptom of the very kind of inherent antisemitism that resides in many Christians unconsciously.

586 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 7:39:53am

#584 quark2

Ah so.

Thanks.

587 Expat Canuck  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 7:57:57am

NOTICE to all moonbats: Shut up, I'm busy. Talk to me after the Apocalypse.

588 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:11:04am

@585

You deliberately twist everything that is posted.
Over and over it is posted that it is recognized as crimes against the Jews. What do we as posters have to do...get on our stomachs and grovel at your feet for mercy?
You are not interested in accepting our recognition, you are only interested in continuing in your hatred.

And you explain to me with clarity just how my statement about christians vanishing without a trace is a anti semitic statement.

You have exhibited quite clearly you have only contempt and hatred for any thing that alludes to or associates with christianity.
No matter how we approach you, you only continue to slash at us.

We do not celebrate the crusades, no matter how insistent you are in your statements. It was a dark dark time in our history, that cannot be ignored or erased.

You are Moishe a very sad human being.

589 Killian Bundy  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:31:17am

Why Can’t We Be Friends?

/War

590 LemonJoose  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:34:13am

No problemo. If I was the pope, I would issue the requested apology, and attach a demand that Osama Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Musab al-Zarqawi, the heads of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and dozens of other Islamic terrorist leaders apologize for their actions, issue fatwas condemning Islamic terrorism against non-Muslims, disarm their organizations, and turn themselves in.

591 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:43:12am

@590 LemonJoose

Do you have any idea of how many broken jaws that would cause? *lol

/picking jaw up off of floor

592 EE  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:48:45am

"Moishe Pipick" is sowing dissension in the ranks, either unintentionally, or intentionally. He says he is Jewish, and he may be, or he may not be.

If unintentionally, then he is surely a political moron.
If intentionally, then he may be a jihadist spreading taqiya in order to divide and conquer.

593 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 8:55:06am

Sometimes I have to get a nights' sleep before it becomes clear to me just exactly what it is about a certain post or poster that irritates me so much. I think that I've put my finger on it. The fur started to fly when Moishe said something to the effect that he would rather live under dhimitude than risk the slaughter of the crusaders. This sounds a little too much to me like "better red than dead". It sounds like the philosophy of a coward. Let's be clear: under dhimitude, slavery was certain. With the crusades, death was a risk. If life is more precious to you than liberty, to paraphrase Patton, you just a sniveling yellow-bellied coward.

594 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:15:01am

#593

"Let's be clear: under dhimitude, slavery was certain. With the crusades, death was a risk."

"This sounds a little too much to me like "better red than dead".

Your analogy doesn't really make sense because Jews were certainly 'second-class citizens' while living in Christian Europe during the time. There was no such thing as 'liberty' for Jews anywhere. Christian Europe provided no special opportunities for freedom for Jews (except an increased chance of death). And in fact, Dhimmitude, although by today's standards is abhorant, during the time in question, provided some assurance of basic rights, i.e basic rights to exist as a Jew unavailable in Christian Europe. The association you made and divulge may however explain your irrational distaste for the arguments I've been making.

595 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:25:11am

The only argument that you are making is you are still living in ancient europe.
If it's so bad here, being associated with modern christianity why don't you look around for Galt's Gulch and see if it will open up for you back in the day of the caliphate in the ME. You might actually find some peace there.

596 Ben B  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:26:17am

The Burgess shales are full of apologies.

597 TalkinKamel  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:26:38am

#592 EE

I'm afraid you may be right about Moishe---on both counts.

598 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:27:26am

#592

EE  3/18/2005 10:48AM PST

"Moishe Pipick" is sowing dissension in the ranks, either unintentionally, or intentionally. He says he is Jewish, and he may be, or he may not be."

"If unintentionally, then he is surely a political moron.
If intentionally, then he may be a jihadist spreading taqiya in order to divide and conquer."

---

The forced choice you provide is illogical.

Have you ever considered that those who valorized the Crusades in the first place are those who are responsible for "sowing dissension"?

Have you ever considered that there are ways of examing history that do not necesarily depend on the current political situation?

Have you ever considered that for you to incessently speculate that I am not a Jew, simply because I might disgree with your own politics in some respects, could be an indication of your own latent antisemitism?

599 helloworld  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:32:22am

557 Moishe

(Interestingly, the antisemitic passage from the New Testament I offered was completely ignored.)

how was that passage antisemitic? it was during a time when christians (as a minority jewish cult) were being persecuted by the mainline jewish authority and the author was describing his plight. who denies this? i can even quote from the babylonian talmud (with the jewish encyclopedia to back me up) and the RAMBAM that not only were early jewish authorities persecuting the christian cult, they were also killing off its members (including it's mamzer founder who they take full credit in killing). do you want the references? all from authentic jewish websites with full citation.

i can also quote "antisemitic" passages from the tanakh, with yahweh cursing the jews to death, jewsish tribe vs jewsih tribe, jews being killed for insulting moses, etc.. i can also provide those verses for your reading pleasure.

and yet you continue in saying the NT is antisemitic, without a shred of evidence. some people on this site joke that the LLL has BDS (bush derangement syndrome) it appears Moishe has JDS (jesus derangement syndrome).

600 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:33:16am

The problem with your argument is that you are presuming something that hasn't been demonstrated, and is in dispute: that Christian Europe was worse for Jews than the Islamic world. And scholars will argue that and never cone to a resolution. But then again, to be a scholar these days means prostituting yourself to political correctness, and so any consensus that might exist will necessarily be skewed toward the Islamic view. In short, I'm not buying it.

601 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:33:45am

The argument Moishe has been making is that the early celebrations of the Crusades in this topic (early yesterday) were a mistake because Jews were also slaughtered by invading Christian armies.

He's just suggesting that the Crusades shouldn't be celebrated (and they were celebrated by a few here yesterday.)

I think he has a point in this.

He's not asking for the Pope to apologize. He isn't asking for billions(?) of Christians to vanish from the face of the Earth either. (Good grief!)

He just doesn't think people should celebrate the Crusades because they were also directed at Jews.

A lack of celebrating is itself a reasonable request, IMO, no matter how Moishe phrased it.

Personally, I think the celebrations of the Crusades here yesterday were just jokes meant to spit in the eyes of the Muslims who are demanding an apology from the Pope.

I disagree that Jews here were afraid to say something. I think some of us just took these comments in the spirit of making fun of the Muslim complainers (rather than being anything against Jews.)

Just my opinion.

602 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:38:00am

#597

TalkinKamel  3/18/2005 11:26AM PST

I'm afraid you may be right about Moishe---on both counts.
---

So I'm a Jewish Jihadist? Intentionally and unintentionally spreading mis/disinformation? That's a hard concept to wrap your head around considering the multiple, mutually exclusive ontological categories it demands the conceptualizer to maintain.

Not the most parsimonious explanation that's for sure.

Is that the best you guys can do?

603 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:42:34am

#600 Earth2moonbat

The problem with your argument is that you are presuming something that hasn't been demonstrated, and is in dispute: that Christian Europe was worse for Jews than the Islamic world. And scholars will argue that and never cone to a resolution.

The Spanish Inquisition lasted 400 years, though. Jews were forced to convert to Christianity and then persecuted as being insincere Christians (duh!)

The Islamic world wasn't organized enough to engage in as much Jew-killing over the last 1400 years as Europe managed to do.

Europeans killed more Jews (on a larger scale and with more organization) than Muslims did, although Muslims also treated Jews horribly.

If you do some research, Europe was a more deadly place for Jews than the Muslim world for a long time. Jews were more likely to die in Europe, which is why many fled back to the Middle East to live among Muslims as dhimmis.

Again, Muslims treated Jews as being sub-human, but they just didn't organize themselves to mass slaughter Jews in the ways that the Europeans did (not until recently anyway.)

This is a matter of history.

I'm not being politically correct in this. Life among Muslims was HORRID for Jews under Islam for 1400 years. Jews were less likely to be mass slaughtered under Islam, though. It was something that happened quite a bit in Europe over the years.

604 quark2  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:47:15am

As one Jewish friend told me earlier...I wouldn't touch that thread with a barge pole...

And now rightasrain is the icing on the Moishe cake.

The posters were parodying the crusades at the expense of the moslims. That is not celebrating the crusades. Then with all of the sypathetic posts agreeing with Moishe is denigrated by him.

feh!

605 Ben B  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:47:35am

I suspect the church at the time of the crusades picked up a lot of nasty habits from their opponents. The church then didn't have much in common with Jesus' teaching. Ordinary people were forbidden to read the bible in words they could understand. Hell was made insistent. Heaven was made material and banal. In short, the church learnt a lot from Islam; the exclusivity, the stick-and-carrot hell and heaven, the cultivation of doctrinal ignorance in the masses and the psychological manipulation: it's all there. And the post-hoc invention of the idea of apostolic succession.

606 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:51:03am

#599

"i can also quote "antisemitic" passages from the tanakh, with yahweh cursing the jews to death, jewsish tribe vs jewsih tribe, jews being killed for insulting moses, etc.. i can also provide those verses for your reading pleasure.'

Exactly! What is written explicitly in these ancient texts shouldn't be used to disparage an entire religious group. That goes for all of them. That said, I have no problem suggesting that life was better for Medieval Jews in Islamic Spain than in Christian Europe *and* claiming that the Koran has more explicit antisemitic passages that could be (and are) used by current fundamentalists in order to sanction violence against Jews.

607 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:54:56am

Ben B, the early Christians were even more influenced by the pasts of their mostly pagan populations (people who had been pagans were converted to Christians.)

They were NOT allowed to read their Bible, as you said (even if they could read, which they could NOT.) Europeans didn't make inroads into being literate as popuations until the invention of the printing press 500 years ago.

The early European Christians were NOT the G-d-fearing Christians we know today (not by any stretch of the imagination.)

They were peoples who had been conquered by Christian armies.

What all these various groups did to Jews over the centures is unspeakable.

They were a scary bunch from a barbaric period in history.

608 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:57:41am

M.P. should just go back to being 8 yr-old American suicide bomber and be done with it.

609 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 9:59:27am

What's interesting is that during the Roman Empire, Jews were a fairly large minority (15-20%, I believe.) Some Jewish colonies lived in what is now Europe.

The peoples of Europe then were wild and nasty pagans (more than just a tad sub-civilized.)

The Jewish colonies in Europe were civilized, though, with mandatory education (literacy) for children, etc.

610 helloworld  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:06:55am

do the members of this board know that europe literally went through hell and back after the roman empire in the west collapsed?

1) end of 5th century the roman empire in the west collapses, the only authority the western world had known for centuries is gone.

2) barbarian invasions. the huns, goths, visagoths, lombards, vandals, etc.. wreck whats left of the roman empire and insanity insues.

3) plague hits western europe, hundreds of thousands die.

4) the world darkens, LITERALLY darkens. around 526 CE various ancient historians from europe to china mention the sun blackening and the stars "disappearing"

5) around the end of the 7th century, islam expands and conquers most of the middle east, north africa, and spain.

6) plague AGAIN, thousands die

7) around the 9th and 10th centuries as things are getting back to normal, the vikings start sacking northern european cities.

8) 11th century and up, the ottoman empire threatens europe over and over again. once just stopping at the streets of vienna.

what did islam have to go through?

since it's inception in the 7th century till the end of the 14th it was the world's super power. only after the invasion of the monguls did it start to wane. thats 700 years of prosperity and at the first sign of serious trouble it collapses. it's collapse continues to this day!

contrast this to europe that went through hell and bounced back to rebuild it's economy and start the scientific age.

611 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:14:46am

#610 helloworld

Good points.

This probably explains why Islam treated Jews horribly but not quite as horribly as Europe did during much of these times.

Europe was going through horrible problems of their own that Islam wasn't really seeing.

Neither area was good for Jews, though.

Luckily, Jews spent those almost 2000 years being assured that the Jewish people would be returning to Jerusalem someday and that everything was going to turn out alright.

612 helloworld  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:30:16am

not to beat a dead horse but continuing:

when islam conquered north africa, mesopotamia, and persia. it ran into civilizations that were around for millenium. when these indigenous peoples were in the majority it was islams "golden age". there was a list of 25 famous islamic doctors: 23 were mesopotamian christians and 2 were persian converts to islam! when islam became the majority what happened to it's golden age?

the exact opposite happened to western europe. it was overrun by barbarians who were nomads with barely any civilization to speak of.

islam also controlled the entire middle east the crossroads of east and west. it controlled the trade routes and hence accumulated MASSIVE wealth. muslim merchants were located everywhere from cordoba spain to china.

the exact opposite was the case for europe, it was stuck between a rock and a hard place. it had to go through the islamic middle east if it wanted to do business with india or china and there were no ocean routes to the east yet. hence christopher columbus' famous ocean voyage in 1492.

613 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:33:47am

#603 rightasrain

I'll take everything you say there at face value. One of the difficulties making this comparison is that while the Moslems had a systematic, codified way of casting Jews (and others) into second-class status, what you were dealing with in Europe was more bottom-up or middle-down old-fashioned bigotry. Comparisons are like nailing jello to the wall.

What bothers me isn't so much the pointing out of the nasty facts of history vis-a-vis Europe, and much as the attitude that I am hearing from a certain direction that dhminitude was acceptable. Among other things, it smacks of political correctness /historical revisionism.

History sucks. Let's all admit it, and then look forward.

614 piglet  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:34:52am
I'm not being politically correct in this. Life among Muslims was HORRID for Jews under Islam for 1400 years. Jews were less likely to be mass slaughtered under Islam, though. It was something that happened quite a bit in Europe over the years.

Yes, during the period when europe was literaly burning jews and rejecting science, the islamic world was embracing trade and science. During this time the islamic world found it to their advantage to treat jews as semi-protected distinctly second class citizens. One rule was that jews could not carry a weapon, which was a right that all muslim males had. Not that carrying a big knife would have helped a jew is a world where fighting back would have been far more costly then losing any confrontation, but the psychological aspect remains.

[Link: www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...]

Dhimmis were excluded from public office and armed service, and were forbidden to bear arms. They were not allowed to ride horses or camels, to build synagogues or churches taller than mosques, to construct houses higher than those of Muslims or to drink wine in public. They were not allowed to pray or mourn in loud voices-as that might offend the Muslims. The dhimmi had to show public deference toward Muslims-always yielding them the center of the road. The dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence in court against a Muslim, and his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court. To defend himself, the dhimmi would have to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense. This left the dhimmi with little legal recourse when harmed by a Muslim.(4)

Dhimmis were also forced to wear distinctive clothing. In the ninth century, for example, Baghdad's Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany.(5)

615 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:41:07am

#613 Earth2moonbat

What bothers me isn't so much the pointing out of the nasty facts of history vis-a-vis Europe, and much as the attitude that I am hearing from a certain direction that dhminitude was acceptable. Among other things, it smacks of political correctness /historical revisionism.

Well, I don't think he was saying that dhimmitude was "acceptable."

I think he was saying that what was going on in Europe was worse.

It is a fact that Jews were fleeing from Europe to the Middle East (especially at the time of the Spanish Inquisition.)

Jews were thrown out of England for 500 years, too.

The history of mankind on Earth is rather sickening and barbaric in many way, especially when one looks at the treatment of Jews (in Europe AND in the Middle East.)

The worst treatment from both worlds (towards Jews) occurred during the 20th Century, too, which makes it even worse.

It's still going on today, in fact. Europe is siding with the Arabs who are hellbent on driving Jews from this Earth if it's the last thing they ever do.

This is going on right now. There's nothing ancient about this history.

Thank goodness for America, though.

616 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:47:03am

#614 piglet

During this time the islamic world found it to their advantage to treat jews as semi-protected distinctly second class citizens. One rule was that jews could not carry a weapon, which was a right that all muslim males had. Not that carrying a big knife would have helped a jew is a world where fighting back would have been far more costly then losing any confrontation, but the psychological aspect remains.

Right! This is the truth about what went on in the M.E. for Jews under Islamic rule.

The politically correct delusion in all this is the claim that Muslims and Jews lived happily and in peace in the Middle East for 1400 years (which is an outright lie.)

There was nothing all that happy or peaceful to be a Jew in the Middle East when Muslims could spit at you and it was against the law to cover your face from the spittle. Jews routinely had their property stolen, too.

Jews were treated (and called) the sons of pigs and monkeys by Muslims.

However, Europe was worse.

The Jewish people needed freedom from BOTH sets of people.

617 helloworld  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:50:14am
The Jewish people needed freedom from BOTH sets of people.

amen brother!

618 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:50:53am

#415 John Schneider

It's interesting that many of the Catholic faith refuse to acknowledge that Christ himself (whether one believes him to be the Messiah or not) was a Jew.

This reminds me of the Soviets, who wouldn't acknowlege that Marx was a Jew. Is there a pattern here?

619 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:54:08am

#615 rightasrain

The worst treatment from both worlds (towards Jews) occurred during the 20th Century, too, which makes it even worse.

See entry #421. I believe that there is a lot more going on than just old-fashioned bigotry. Both in the 20th century and now. Keep your eye on the ball.

620 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 10:57:30am

"I disagree that Jews here were afraid to say something. I think some of us just took these comments in the spirit of making fun of the Muslim complainers (rather than being anything against Jews.)"

I guess I think we're both right. Many people at LGF, regardless of their religous beliefs or affliliations, feel that they have the moral right to ridicule Islam with complete impunity. These are the people who are truly responsible for "sowing dissent" because by doing so, often quite thoughtlessly, they unintentionally raise very awkward historical issues. Exactly what I am being accused of doing. And nobody should ever be afraid to point out gross inaccuracy and historical whitewash. Its a blog.

I apologize if I seriously offended anyone. But then again, maybe you shouldn't take my word for it because there is no way to prove, with complete certainty, that I am not the Anti-Christ come here to deceive you. (Was he a Jew?)

621 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:02:47am

#421 Earth2moonbat

The first to go were not the Jews, they were the disabled. The Jews weren't far down on the list, because the Fuhrer deemed them undesirable, but the real driving force was "rationalizing" society and the economy. If they thought that there was a "rational" use for the Jews, they would have been "used".

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, WHOA.

Hitler's war was PRIMARILY and QUITE SPECIFICALLY AGAINST THE JEWISH PEOPLE.

There WERE "rational uses" for Jews, for goodness sake. How can you not know that Jews were prominent in SCIENCE, MEDICINE, ECONOMICS, LAW, ENGINEERING, ETC. during this time?

You need to read up on Hitler's view of the Jewish people. He wanted Jews ERADICATED FROM THE PLANET EARTH.

It has nothing to do with Jews not being useful.

Please read Lucy Davidovich's "Hitler's War Against the Jews."

Jews were THE OBJECTS OF THIS WAR, NOT COLLATERAL DAMAGE.

Please do some research on this before you ever bring up something like this again. You have no idea what you're saying.

622 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:03:28am

Maybe he is!

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

623 EE  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:07:04am

#602 Moishe Pipick
You are obviously causing rancor in a group that was more or less harmonious. Now either you are doing this unintentionally, or you are doing this intentionally.
Also, you claim to be Jewish. Either you really are Jewish, or you are not.
I'm open-minded; I'll admit to various possibilities.

There are various possibilities, and here are two of them:

If you are Jewish, and you are causing this rancor unintentionally, then you are a political moron. Because these are difficult times for the Jewish state, and it doesn't make sense for you to be nipping at the ankles of those who want to be helpful and supportive. The rabbis say that the temple was destroyed because of causeless hatred. It seems to me that perhaps there may have been some idiocy involved also, because idiocy is what I see in what you are doing.

If you are not Jewish, and you are causing this rancor intentionally, then you are doing the job that one commentator suggested: jihadists going to boards and writing things that would get the participants going at each other. And you seem to have a good partner in Miguel, who soaks up what you write and uses it to put the knife into the support of Christians for Israel. I say "partner" because the two of you seem to be on the same side, both seeking to disrupt the Christian support for Israel, and it may be that you two are in cahoots.

Well, whether you are doing this unintentionally or intentionally, you are doing the work of the jihadists.

Pity you have stolen the name of a comical character of the Yiddish stage. It was before my time, but I think that's who the original "Moishe Pipick" was. There is nothing comical in your project of spreading rancor among supporters of the Jewish state. You are either a fool or a knave, but I don't find either of these possibilities very funny.

624 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:08:43am

#620 Moishe Pipick

But then again, maybe you shouldn't take my word for it because there is no way to prove, with complete certainty, that I am not the Anti-Christ come here to deceive you. (Was he a Jew?)

I'm glad you said that. Up until that point, I couldn't tell whether or not you are a troll. Intentionally or not, you did stir up the sewage. Now it will just settle and digest anaerobically...

625 rightasrain  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:12:33am

Maybe it's just time to let all this go.

626 Thom  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:12:48am

#624 Earth2moonbat

He's a troll and a bomb thrower. When he first showed up here his nick was "8 yr-old American suicide bomber ".

We'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out what the hell that was supposed to mean. He refused to explain.

627 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:15:23am

EE

That is quite the conspiracy theory. You forgot to mention the possibility that I'm one of the 4000 year-old Elders of Zion living miles below the earth.

You *really* don't get it.

Moonbat:

"Intentionally or not, you did stir up the sewage."

Sewage? Is that what you call those parts of the universe you choose to ignore?

628 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:17:22am

#621 rightasrain

I hate it when we get tripped up on nuance. I can see how you read it that way, but I didn't mean to imply that the holocaust wasn't a priority for Hitler. What I was trying to convey is that it is a piece of a larger puzzle. If the other pieces weren't in place, he may not have been able maintain his power. As it stands, there was at least one (please correct me if there were more) assasination attempt, that almost succeeded.

What you need to consider is that while "racism" has in the 21st century become off limits, anti-semitism is still a powerful chess piece, and people will try to use it. Toward their own ends.

629 piglet  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:19:55am
If they thought that there was a "rational" use for the Jews, they would have been "used".

they were:

they were forced to do back breaking labor

they had their warm coats sent to keep germans warm, sometimes with bullet holes and the outline of the yellow stars so carefully sew on by now dead bubbies still showing.

their hair was cut off just before they were gassed and saved for later use.

630 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:20:20am

#627 Moishe Pipic

If you are Israeli (or some other non-Anglophone), maybe you have never heard the expression "stirring up the s**t". If you don't know what it means, ask someone who does.

631 EE  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:23:18am

#627 Moishe Pipick
Then you claim to be a fool, rather than a knave?
It may be that you are too clever to be the fool you pretend to be.

632 Earth2moonbat  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:24:40am

#629 piglet

I'm sorry if the statement was overly brief. That wasn't the intent. I suppose that this is why writers write essays that span pages, rather than try to say too much in too little space. The idea was that if the central planners had concieved a way to "use" the entire population, they would have. There was no intention to deny that much "use" did in fact happen.

633 Moishe Pipick  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:43:03am

Guys take care. I don't know if I'm a "fool or a knave" the Prince of Darkness or Light. It's tough being the Anti-Christ.

Bye.

634 LemonJoose  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:44:02am

Just general comments on the discussion:

I got into a debate yesterday on another thread which paralelled the current discussion in many respects.

What I freely admit as an agnostic Christian (raised as an Episcopalian):

The Catholic Church and people who called themselves Christian have done bad things in the past to Jews. Note should be made of these past mistakes so that we can learn from them.

The Catholic Church has offiicially changed its policy/position/relationship on/with Judaism and Jews.

Jews and Christians are currently getting along better than anytime I can remember in my life. At the risk of sounding like a politician, I consider it a great opportunity to heal old wounds and build a better future for us all.

What I learned:
Some people prefer to DWELL on past conflicts and injustices, and thus jeopardize opportunities to mend fences and build new productive friendships.

Some people are not happy until you bow down to them and admit that your own ancestors were murderous, treacherous scum, while their ancestors were enlightened, peaceful saints. I guess this must inflate their egos in some way.

There are a few people in all of the religions who are incapable of acknowledging that any important leaders/teachers of their particular faith may have at some time in the past or present done or advocated for something that could be considered a crime against one of the other faiths.

Some people prefer to highlight evidence of religious intolerance contained in the texts of other religions, while simultaneously whitewashing similar evidence in the texts of their own religion.

635 EE  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 3:09:24pm

There are things that unite us, and there are things that divide us.

These are serious times, in which we have entered World War 4 and the stakes are very high. If the jihad ideology espoused by radical Islamism were victorious over us, the consequences would be very grave. So I think it's important to keep a focus on winning the war. A main focus on what unites us.

The comical name of "Moishe Pipick" fooled me as to his/her game. I think it's the name of a bygone comical character on the old Yiddish stage. It's used by various people who want to be funny, and one does not have to be Jewish to have learned that expression. The reader here who calls itself "Moishe Pipick" plays the jester. But I think that it has a more serious agenda.

In line with its jester pose, it lies outrageously about itself, so I think it is fair to take its claim to be Jewish with a grain of salt. Without knowing its background, let me assume that it is a male, and let me call him Mohammed abu Taqiya.

Although I cannot really know Mr. Taqiya's agenda for sure, I can see what he has already done, so I feel entitled to take a guess. I would venture that his purpose in posting here is to find fault lines in the general solidarity of the LGF readers, and to act as an agent provocateur to exaggerate those fault lines and make them fissures.

By emphasizing that which divides us, he seeks to weaken the unity of the war against the jihad ideology.

In a war, or in a preparation for a war, when somebody brings up the past it is often for some purpose. In this case, I think that Mr. Taqiya's purpose is to set Christian against Jew, and Jew against Christian. The words that come to mind for his method are divide and conquer.

In his argument about scriptures of all faiths -- presumably including the Quran, and especially including the Quran -- he shows that his interest is much wider than merely Christian-Jewish relations (which he apparently wants to harm).

I think that Mr. Taqiya, although he plays the jester, is too clever to be a fool, and that he has an agenda. And that a substantial part of that agenda is dawa and the weakening of the solidarity of kafirdom.

636 Ben B  Fri, Mar 18, 2005 11:19:03pm

EE 635

Good comment.

cf Robert Browning, 'Childe Roland to the Dark Tower came'

The fight must so have seemed in that fell cirque.
What penned them there, with all the plain to choose?
No foot-print leading to that horrid mews,
None out of it. Mad brewage set to work
Their brains, no doubt, like galley-slaves the Turk
Pits for his pastime, Christians against Jews.

637 Moishe Pipick  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 3:49:40am

"What I learned:
Some people prefer to DWELL on past conflicts and injustices, and thus jeopardize opportunities to mend fences and build new productive friendships."

>LGF: "It's About Mending Fences" I like that.


"Some people are not happy until you bow down to them and admit that your own ancestors were murderous, treacherous scum, while their ancestors were enlightened, peaceful saints. I guess this must inflate their egos in some way."

>"Bow down"? I am demanding this of who now? My ancestors were enlightened? I'd be less concerned about my ego and more concerned with your own. This bit makes you seem quite insecure and defensive.


"There are a few people in all of the religions who are incapable of acknowledging that any important leaders/teachers of their particular faith may have at some time in the past or present done or advocated for something that could be considered a crime against one of the other faiths."

>OK.


"Some people prefer to highlight evidence of religious intolerance contained in the texts of other religions, while simultaneously whitewashing similar evidence in the texts of their own religion."

>Don't tell Charles you said this.

638 TalkinKamel  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 3:58:07am

#635 EE

Once again, I think you're on to something.

Yeah, I'm beginning to think ol' "Moishe's" here to stir up trouble too. He's certainly spewing bile, refusing to listen to any arguments---and cleverly deflecting attention from what was the the original subject of this thread---a Moslem religious leader, WHO SUPPORTS HOMICIDE BOMBING AND ISLAMIC NUKES, trying to manipulate the West in a PR move.

Maybe "Moishe" doesn't like us criticizing this guy? Rather odd, if he really is Jewish. . .

GAZE, or putting him in scrollover country, would be a good idea, I think.

639 Moishe Pipick  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 4:00:59am

#635 EE  3/18/2005 05:09PM PST

That is simply the most antisemitic post I've ever read at LGF. What a conspiracy theory! Sedition, deception, impersonation? I'm a Muslim? I can't wait to tell my friends.

Moishe Pipick and his ilk are a real threat to national unity. Better round us up. This is war!

The Jews at LGF are assimilated pussies. (Keep in mind I say this as I write on Shabbos.)

640 Moishe Pipick  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 4:24:33am

#635 EE

By your own logic, many of the people claiming to be Jews and who support your own politics, could be Christians impersonating Jews!

But that's the creepy thing about Jews right EE? You never real know who they are, and even if you do know who they are, what are they?

I think you're on to something.

If I am here to "stir up trouble" where are all your Jewish "allies" shouting me down?

Very suspicious.

641 Moishe Pipick  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 5:42:55am

#421 Earth2moonbat  3/17/2005 05:53PM PST


"Anti-semitism is but one element in the holocaust, and it may not even be the most critical element."

No comments?

642 EE  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:15:46am

"Moishe Pipick" (Mohammed abu Taqiya)
GAZE

643 Thom  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:18:17am

#635 EE

Did you check his comments when he was posting as "8 yr-old American suicide bomber"?

I have no idea what his religion may be, and won't speculate, but he is definitely here to stir up shit.

644 EE  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:36:58am

Thom, here's a comment by "8-yr. American old suicide bomber"
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
It's a threat ("see you soon", when said by a self-proclaimed splodeydope, is a threat).

There's a lot about this strange person that rings very false.

Notice that he plays both sides, to stir up anger and resentment.
"If I am here to "stir up trouble" where are all your Jewish "allies" shouting me down?"
Here he is playing "Miguel", seeking to incite Christians against Jews.

645 Thom  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 7:00:47am

And the very next comment was:

#11 FH 3/24/2004 08:45AM PST

Not funny RWC...

It stopped being funny a long time ago...

FH thought 8yoasb was RWC frolling!

Rayra called him a "turd" (#63), and turd came back with (#67):

I will stop being a turd if someone has either the courage or reason to explain why I am a "turd".

Hmmm ...

646 Thom  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 7:04:39am

Oops, that was to EE (sorry).

LOL. I remember that thread now.

Explaining why people thought he was a turd, I offered "Well, for starters, that nick of yours isn't helping your case..." and he replied:

Why! You guys are driving me nuts!

Are you all terrorists?

LMAO!

647 EE  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 8:43:27am

"Moishe", or "8 yr. old suicide bomber", or "Miguel", or as I prefer to call him Mohammed abu Taqiya is seeking to cause hostility between Christians and Jews at LGF.

First of all, to the Jews he acts as an agent provocateur. He wants to divert attention from the topic of this thread, which involves Islamic leaders demanding an apology. He wants the Jews on this thread to complain about victimization -- not from Muslims in our time, but from Christians in yesteryear. Although he plays the buffoon or jester, his first attack is directed against Christians of yesteryear, and he is very persistent in redirecting the topic. He is an agent provocateur, directing an attack, and wanting the Jews to follow in his footsteps. He does this in order to provoke a counterattack from Christians against Jews. He wants both of these.

Then he turns around and seeks to arouse more flame by taunting the Christians that Jews have not denounced him. It's the Jewish Sabbath today. He is seeking now to arouse Christian anger at the Jews. That's the meaning of his statement:
"If I am here to "stir up trouble" where are all your Jewish "allies" shouting me down?"

And he seeks out nuggets from the Christian side that he thinks will anger the Jews.

In other words, his goal is to cause hostility, and he tries to stir up each side against the other.

As to his identity, he could be a radical Leftist, or he could be an Islamist. There is a partnership between the radical Left and Islamists. Whatever his identity, I think he is an equal opportunity hater of both Christians and Jews, and his goal is to cause discord between us.

To "Moishe"/ "Miguel"/ "8 yr old American Suicide Bomber"/ Mohammed abu Taqiya: GAZE

648 rightasrain  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 4:15:43pm

Ok, the Jewish Sabbath is now over in my neck of the woods.

One question:

How do we know that "Moishe Pipik" is also "8 yr-old American Suicide Bomber"?

649 quark2  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 4:29:39pm

@647 EE

The only anti-semite on this thread is Moishe Pipick/Miguel/8yroldsuicidebomber...etc.
It's been noted before it's most likely an old poster by another name who has been flamboyant in its hatred of christians and christianity.
But since its attack did indeed occur during the Sabath, your
analysis is probably correct.
Nevertheless its ulterior motive has failed. So it should now slink back to its dank corner and sob into its hanky.

And the rest of us should GAZE at it in its misery.

650 rightasrain  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 4:34:26pm

#647 EE

So are we guessing that Moishe is also "8 yr-old American Suicide Bomber" by the writing style and things being said?

I'm just curious.

There's been so much sarcasm from Moishe Pipick that I don't know what to think about any of this anymore.

651 EE  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 5:15:04pm

rightasrain
The identification of "Moishe Pipick" as being the same person as "8 yr old American suicide bomber" was suggested by Thom in his posts #608, 626, and 643.

I trust that Thom has done some detective work on this.

There is something about the postings of "Moishe Pipick" that rings very false to me, very suspect. He takes this thread about Islamic leaders demanding an apology, and very very persistently with an in-your-face manner turns it into an attack on Christianity of yesteryear. But then, on the Jewish Sabbath, he attacks the Jews by saying that they are not protesting anything he has written -- as if he is taunting the Christians to be angry at the Jews.

He wrote:
"If I am here to "stir up trouble" where are all your Jewish "allies" shouting me down?"

That was his Sabbath gift to the Jews.

In other words, he has sought to start a fire, and proceded to pour gasoline on both sides.

There is something very fishy about what he has been doing. Something very dishonest.

It just smells like the acts of an agent provocateur to the Jews, telling them to attack those who are supporting the Jewish state; and then turning around and telling the Christians that the Jews are supporting him (in order to cause even more hostility toward the Jews).

As to his other nics, I should leave that to the experts to track it down. I trust Thom's detective work.

652 rightasrain  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 5:24:15pm

#651 EE

Thanks for the explanation.

Again, I don't know what to think about all this.

It's just as well that the discussion seems to have wrapped up.

653 Charles  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 5:59:06pm

Thom is quite right. The 'Moishe Pipick' troll is indeed the same creature as '8 yr-old American suicide bomber' and its account is now blocked.

It was posting from Brooklyn College.

654 rightasrain  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:04:54pm

Good investigative work, Thom.

I'm impressed!

Thanks for clearing this up, Charles.

655 quark2  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:29:17pm

@653 Charles.

Thank you Charles.

656 NY Nana  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 6:43:39pm

Charles

Thank you so much. Brooklyn College? Ironic..OT: Brooklyn College's Eugene Shenderov Wins 2005 Rhodes Scholarship

Thom:

Great detective work! I owe you some chicken soup!

657 aFriend  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 11:01:36pm

Holy crap. It's discouraging seeing a small, baleful minority taking control of this thread. They should be ignored.

Such people would love to do nothing more than permanently push others away, so they can then scream from the rooftops, "See! They were never our friends! And we don't need them!"

I have Irish and English ancestors. But imagine if, every time any thread started which recognized that much of Western civilization is here because of the courage of many English, my response was always, predictably, "But! Look at the genocide they perpetrated on the Irish!"

Fact is, they did. But does that characterize the English? By no means!

The Americans, in the American-Filipino War (1899-1902) perpetrated some of the most base, barbaric atrocities imaginable, but does that characterize Americans? No! And does that atrocity, even with the evils of slavery and our treatment of Indians, completely dispel the Good that this nation is, and that is has done? No, of course not, and only narrow-minded people would deem it so.

Should we learn of the past atrocities of our nation? Yeah, we should, but *only* if we also learn of the great acts of our nation, and if we learn of those past evils not to put onerous, purposely burdens of guilt on ourselves, but that we see that even the best of Men - white, black, Japanese, American, Jewish, Christian, Republican, Democrat - can easily become evil if we don't watch for its wiles.

We should be aware of our past evils, so that will strive to always be better than that. And we should learn of our past greatness, that we will likewise be driven to do greater things.

658 aFriend  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 11:10:02pm

Charles, you rock, man. And so do the incredibly overwhelming majority here who want us to be united against the Evil of Islam. We all hold no ill will toward anyone, including Muslims, who want to live and let live, but we will stand up to those who would kill our children or force them to bow to their religion.

I know that evil has been done in the name of Christianity, and by Americans, and by white males - all groups to which I belong - and I hate that fact. But I also know that great good has been done by those groups - and *other* groups!

I just finished a book which included past recollections from one of the death camps, and it was horrifying that people could do such things. I had to sit with my wife and children and tell them some of these things, because movies and museums can never really place us there.

Now, we who love Good, and love God, must stand together to fight this other, older, but now bolder, horrible cancer threatening to destroy civilization and the very world itself. Make no mistake, there are many who, if allowed to, would kill even more than the millions upon millions who died last century.

659 aFriend  Sat, Mar 19, 2005 11:21:38pm

Sigh. Sorry, my post #657 was clearly no longer necessary! I was catching up on LGF, after being away several days, found this amazing entry, was flabbergasted that an idiot was demanding an apology from the West for something centuries ago, and scanned the first 1/2 to 2/3 of comments.

At first, they were great - some hilarious (wanting apologies from Canadians and others), and others very serious. Then I saw the ones, mainly from Moishe, which were so divisive. With it being so late, I decided to make a comment, then head to bed.

After posting #657, though, I noticed the ones above it, and realized the troll has already been nailed!

So, I'll now do what I should have done hours ago, and head to bed! I hope I didn't reopen anything, certainly not my intent.

660 EE  Sun, Mar 20, 2005 7:00:02am

Charles, thanks for blocking that troll. And thanks for indicating another name it used.

661 Thom  Sun, Mar 20, 2005 7:23:34am

rightasrain -

If you check the archives you'll come across "Moishe Pipick (formerly 8YOASB)". Anyone who remembers "8-yr old American suicide bomber" (as I do, since he was such a jerk about his nick) would make the connection with that acronym immediately.

662 rightasrain  Sun, Mar 20, 2005 11:40:15am

#661 Thom

Anyone who remembers "8-yr old American suicide bomber" (as I do, since he was such a jerk about his nick) would make the connection with that acronym immediately.

Ah, I see how you made the connection so quickly.

When you first asked him to go BACK to being an 8 yr-old American suicide bomber, I was really shocked (I had no idea that this was a former name.)

I thought it was a suggestion to return to a presumed former occupation. :)

I'm glad I didn't say anything about it at the time. I'd have been apologizing to you for the rest of my life over that misunderstanding. :)

Thanks for the explanation!


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

We feel more like we do now.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

Read More, Spend Less. New Lower Prices on Thousands of Books!

 Frank says:

Ooooh the way you love me baby,
I get so hard now I could die.
Ooooh the way you squeeze me lady
red balloons just pop behind my eyes -- Magic Fingers, 200 Motels