LGF

Foley IMs Were a Prank

Thu, Oct 5, 2006 at 12:37:13 pm PDT

The stupidest scandal of the year just got even stupider: Drudge Report:

According to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.

According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.

The primary source, an ally of Edmund, adamantly proclaims that the former page is not a homosexual. The prank scenario was confirmed by a second associate of Edmund. Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

UPDATE at 10/5/06 2:48:59 pm:

Michael Rogers, the vicious, unscrupulous “activist” who specializes in “outing” gay conservatives, was apparently trying to blackmail an unnamed senator in January. And in March, Rogers explicitly singled out Mark Foley for what can only be described as an insane rant: I have seen the enemy... (Hat tip: righthanded.)

UPDATE at 10/5/06 3:35:17 pm:

ABC News says they have three more former pages coming forward to hammer some more nails in Foley’s coffin.

Advertisement

470 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 crapulentis_sum  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:38:23am

(Message from the DNC)

Nothing to see here. Move along now. Move along...

2 yesandno  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:38:33am

Love it when a plan comes together...

3 Occasional Reader  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:38:40am
goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments

Then Foley should still be censured, for being a frickkin' idiot.

4 JKWEST  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:38:40am

This is seriously effed up...

whos to blame though?

God help this country..

5 alexwest  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:39:06am
Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

Tough noogies. I smell bossible CYA for blowback.

6 minuteman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:39:07am

Foley Follies have jumped the shark. Democraps wail "Rooove! You magnificent bastard."

7 Black George Bush  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:39:53am

Karl Rove strikes again :)

8 MikeL  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:39:57am

Sorry but this scandal has legs. What in the heck is a congressman even doing sending emails like this to minors even if it were a prank. The bottom line is that a lot of people knew about Foley and his behavior for at least five years. They chose to do nothing. Where does the buck stop? Some of us who have kids are outraged about this. Where is the moral leadership?

9 yesandno  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:39:58am

#4...

I agree...hope that the persons that outed it will be highlighted as well..

10 mad_scientist  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:40:07am

This just cant get any stranger can it?

11 rcris5  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:40:09am

Think I'll start sending scanky missives to all the Dems. I bet Barney Frank responds with a florish to-boot. Snarff, laugh.

12 alexwest  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:40:10am

"bossible".

Fantastic spelling.

PIMF, out.

13 # 17  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:40:31am

Isn't it mandatory to be a sexual predator in order to achieve high office in Washington ?

Or is that only for Democrats ?

14 religion of bacon  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:40:41am

I suggest invoking the 24 day rule on this stuff...

15 Black George Bush  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:41:13am

#14 religion of bacon
Not a bad idea.

16 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:41:31am
#3 Occasional Reader 10/5/2006 12:38PM PDT

goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments

Then Foley should still be censured, for being a frickkin' idiot.


AMEN

17 kynna  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:41:45am

Rush was asking why the page had secured a lawyer if he was just a victim. I wonder if he's going to sue the leakers or if he's waiting to get sued by Foley.

Ugly doings on the Hill. If my kid ever got offered the opportunity to be a page, I'd box the ears of the one doing the offering.

18 elBarto  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:42:12am

There is more to this or Foley would not have resigned. This one set may be a prank but he folded too fast. There is more out there. I do not think there is a cover up by the speaker or the party.

19 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:42:43am

I hope this has consequences for those who made up this story.

20 vxbush  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:42:45am

Why do I get the feeling that this "admission" (if it is) won't be covered by the MSM because it isn't interesting anymore?

Color me pessimistic.

21 mad_scientist  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:42:51am

I just thought of a question. If the IM's were joke, then why on earth was the kid representing himself as being under 18?

Isnt there a story out there that said the kid was 18 at the time of the IM?

And if he was misreperesnting his age, why on earth would he do that? This is just to strange...

If anyone can give me the cliff notes version of this it would be appreciated...been so busy, that have been unable to get into the details of this.

22 Merovign  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:43:05am

This doesn't reduce Foley's stupidity, it just adds more stupidity, mendacity, and cynical manipulation to the mix.

If this whole scandal does anything to voter turnout, it will probably be an overall reduction rathern than a targeted one, as people just get sicker and sicker of "politics."

Hopefully the "blowback blowback blowback" phenomenon and how this spun out of control so fast will help convince cynical politicos that scandals just don't work as well as they used to.

What can I say, I'm an optimist.

23 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:43:30am

Unless more comes out, the donx and the MSM have plausable deniability. They can say that they had no way to know that this was a setup.

The flip side is that IM logs are almost impossible to validate. If Foley had fought this, he'd have probably won, because he could claim they're fake, and the donx couldn't prove otherwise.

If a crime was committed, and he ended up in court having to testify under oath, it would be a different situation. But there's still no indication that any crimes were committed.

24 Let's Roll  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:43:32am

Dems rejoice: anything to keep national defense and the war against civilization off the front pages and newscasts. The more we focus on this crap, the less we talk about the most important differences between the parties.

25 drool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:43:51am

Is somebody gonna offer Hastert a wafer thin mint?

26 Occasional Reader  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:43:51am

#16 BZ:

I'm trying to imagine it... "hey, Congressman, how about typing some sexually explicit IM messages to a teenage boy, just, you know, for shits n' giggles?"

"I dunno... yeah, gee, why not."

27 right wing zephyr  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:44:22am

my only question in light of Khomeni's blog about Ramadam and haram is;

rwz: "Is Foley's action intentional or unintentional haram?"

Khomeni: "infidel pig shares cyber bed with ...no one? haram. Stone him!"

28 NoSubmission  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:44:45am

Cool.

Now we can all get back to dealing with the peace-loving RoP.

29 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:44:55am

If this is true (and I think it makes some sense), Foley got Punk'd. Hard. I can imagine a group of kids on the other end of the computer going hysterical with what Foley was typing. It also makes more sense for the IM's to have been saved in this case.

I'm not sure that this changes the scandal too much, though.

30 rcris5  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:12am

#8 MikeL

Outrage? What a Ma-roon...this is too funny. Turning out just as I planned...Bwaaahaha!

Can't wait for the rehab sob stories.

31 hilchar  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:32am

Apparently, Foley did not really want to run again. The GOP convinced him to. He just wanted to get out of Wahsington and quit living in the closet. I would suppose that he was glad to resign immediately,

32 rp1138  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:36am

This scandal may have legs, but it just got both of it's kneecaps taken out. The Dems can pursue this at their own risk, but it just reached the point where it's too stupid and complicted for the Average Joe to care about. That's not a slam at the AJ's, either. Sometimes I think they have more sense than us political types.

In summary, this scandal is done, stick a fork in it.

33 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:38am

#22 Merovign

Hopefully the "blowback blowback blowback" phenomenon and how this spun out of control so fast will help convince cynical politicos that scandals just don't work as well as they used to.

I think most LLLs over the age of 40 still pine for the days of Watergate. The first, last, and only "gate" to ever slam shut on anyone.

34 drool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:43am

Foley rolled over way too fast. There has to be something there.

35 MoonbatBane  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:45:51am

I smell... wait for it... really, just wait for it...

a ROVIAN plot!

Just think about it: How many Democraps do you think are sleeping with underage pages? Now that the Democraps have screamed for an investigation, they'll get one -- but they WON'T like the results.

The House Committee has already said they will go "wherever the investigation leads them."

Actually heard a blurb about a Democrap involved with the page program saying that the Dems really don't want to go there, trying to shut up the Democrap leadership. He was ignored.

Yup, they sure jumped the shark on this one!

36 bill-tb  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:46:07am

Dittos on the plan coming together. Going to be some sore donks. Looks like the Democrats gay witch hunt has run into some truth.

Since there is now an FBI criminal probe, I think we know why Jordan Edmund needed a lawyer. I will bet there will be quite a few that need lawyers before this is done.

37 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:46:19am

#27: Khomeini thought all sex was ok, as long as it was done to a goat or a donkey, and then you sold the meat in another village.

38 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:46:28am

Ahhh...the fruits of my labor.

THIS IS ALL THE WORK OF MY CABAL:

Babba (you haven't said yes yet, but I know you will)
Buzzsawmonkey
Black George Bush
Cattt

We move like lightening!

39 unreconstructed rebel  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:46:36am
The bottom line is that a lot of people knew about Foley and his behavior for at least five years. They chose to do nothing.

I am not sure that anyone really could. The line between moral rectitude & gay-bashing is getting pretty thin. IMHO, the issue hinges on whether an actual crime is committed.

40 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:47:01am

…Where is the moral leadership?

It sure the hell ain’t in Washington!

41 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:47:46am

#29 ChenZhen

I'm not sure that this changes the scandal too much, though.

It doesn't change anything wrt Foley. It does change things wrt the demos and the MSM. This latest revelation is all about the demos and the MSM, and not about Foley.

42 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:48:01am

How does someone get goaded into writing that stuff? He is still cooked.

43 bbcrackmonkey  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:48:37am

Yeah, pages upon pages of sexually charged innuendo was just a prank? I don't think so. I don't understand why Charles is running stories on Foley, it has nothing to do with the WOT.

44 Hooray for Captain Spaulding  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:48:50am

What the Fuck is going on here?

Ahora SI estoy confundido.
Que PUTA pasa aqui?

45 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:48:54am

37 Fjordman

And no deliberate monkey spanking during Ramadan.

46 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:48:55am

This is just getting weirder by the minute. OK, where's the Evil MR. Spock (the one with a beard). Maybe he's behind this fiasco.

/when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro

47 MikeL  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:49:57am

#30 rcris5:

Yeah. I am outraged. I'm not sure where you live but I get pretty outraged about a 52 year old man sending sexually explicit emails/IMs to kids who are 16 or 17 or even 18. It's not right--period. If you can't understand that, then you've got real problems. Plenty of what are called "values voters" these days understand this story because it's not hard to understand. A member of Congress sent sexually explicit emails to kids. That's wrong. On the whole spectrum of sexual abuse, it's not as bad as molesting a five year old. But it's still bad. Maybe you don't have kids. Maybe you just don't understand.

And by the way, I think the word "moron" is spelled "moron"--not "Ma-roon" or whatever assisine spelling you used.

Get a moral compass or STFU.

48 EC Marm  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:50:03am

Apparently, Drudge is reporting, this whole sorry story is a prank. Hope that's true. The technology involved has gone beyond the ability of the MSM to understand, much less report on. For crying out loud, I've heard them report that it was e-mails, when it was instant messages they meant. They have no clue how a print out of an instant message "session" is hardly the same as having the full header information on an e-mail. Hope they learn a lesson. ABC - you listening?

49 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:50:11am

The Democrats will create another scandal by tomorrow to distract from this one.

50 JCM  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:50:23am

Totally irrelevant! It is the seriousness of the charges that matters.

/LLL mode

51 Black George Bush  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:50:52am

#38 Ben Hur
When do we use the weather control machine?

52 MoonbatBane  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:50:53am

#35 me

This makes even more sense in view of (1) Foley apparently didn't really want to run again, so he fell on the sword to sucker the Dems, and (2) just think who the party of NAMBLA is...

53 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:51:15am

So this is like the third excuse that's been floated publicly by someone involved with this story?

Foley: I'm an alcoholic.

Foley: I was a victim of clergy abuse.

Pageboy: Oh, and by the way, the whole thing was a prank gone awry...

Up next...

Pageboy: We knew he was gay, so we got him drunk, and I IMmed him pr0n until he begged for mercy.

Foley: See, I was a victim after all!

54 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:51:20am
55 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:51:25am

#43 bbcrackmonkey

I don't understand why Charles is running stories on Foley, it has nothing to do with the WOT.

You're missing the point. This isn't about Foley. It's about politics and the media. And politics and the media have everything to do with the WOT.

You don't think Rathergate had anything to do with the WOT?

56 bbcrackmonkey  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:51:27am

If this were just a prank then why did Foley:

1) Resign immediatley?
2) Claim to have been molested as a child?
3) Blame his problems on alcoholism?
4) Have multiple chat logs with multiple people, some under 18, all filled with highly charged sexual comments?

57 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:51:47am
58 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:09am

#21 mad_scientist

And if he was misreperesnting his age, why on earth would he do that?

Same reason the folks on the Nightline "catch a pedophile" shows pretended to be 14-yo girls instead of middle-aged men--if you want to catch someone, you have to use bait that appeals to them.

59 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:14am

Drudge has that Hastert is probably going to go soft on the investigation. (IMO)

Something smells here.

60 unreconstructed rebel  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:20am

Engaging the FBI may be brilliant. No way now for the Demoncraps to derail the investigation.

We shall see!

61 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:21am

Gag me with a spoon on all this scandal and the spin they all put on it.

Register Independent and throw them all out with instant term limits at the ballot box.

Barf.

62 SlothB77  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:28am
63 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:40am

To all the people suggesting that Foley's quick resignation is somehow evidence of guilt, you are not considering other explanations.

Maybe Foley, being a party loyalist, folded when the House leadership came down on him. You know, in the "best interest of the party."

This doesn't mean there isn't more to the story, just that it is a possible explanation, among many.

But if this is a case of a prank, I suggest we all send dirty IMs to Karl Rove to express our thanks for another delicious Democrat embarrasment.

64 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:44am

It's embarrassing having to defend this moron. And I'm afraid the prank angle is going to encourage too many people to continue to try.

65 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:52:51am

Black George Bush

Soon. Soon. They're still wondering what happened to Pluto!

66 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:53:01am

Khomeini's Da Man, and cannot be quoted often enough:

Khomeini's Teachings on sex with infants and animals

"The meat of horses, mules, or donkeys is not recommended. It is strictly forbidden if the animal was sodomized while alive by a man. In that case, the animal must be taken outside the city and sold."

"If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned, and the price of it paid to its owner by him who sodomized it."

"It is forbidden to consume the excrement of animals or their nasal secretions. But if such are mixed in minute proportions into other foods their consumption is not forbidden."

"If a man (God protect him from it!) fornicates with an animal and ejaculates, ablution is necessary."

67 Austin Conservative  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:53:10am

Time to start trolling for gay and horny Democrats. I'm sure I can convince a 17 year old to do it.

Oh yeah, be sure to save those IM's for the next election.

What is it with queer politicians being so promiscuous wanting to bugger young hot male pages?

It's time to clean THE HOUSE of all these people.

Oh, I'm sorry, he's just suffering from an identity crisis. Dr. Freud, please prescribe two hot pages and have him bugger them in the morning.

68 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:53:12am

Hey MikeL mar-roon is from a cartoon. It's for emphasis.And you are one...

69 MandyManners  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:53:36am
Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

Their political careers SHOULD be affected. If they're too fucking stupid to see possible consequences, they have no place in politics.

70 crapulentis_sum  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:53:46am

Move along. Nothing to see here. Move along folks. Nothing to see here...

71 RTLM  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:54:33am

"Yet another trumped up leftist cause du jure bites the dust"

And turns around, bites them in the ass...

72 religion of bacon  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:54:40am

#21 mad_scientist

If anyone can give me the cliff notes version of this it would be appreciated

Dems accuse Republicans.

Republicans accuse Dems.

(repeat the above two ad nauseam)

Meanwhile, Islam takes over the world at an accelerating pace.

Executive summary: "diddling (during Ramadan) while Rome burns."

73 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:54:52am

I think most voters will come away from this mess with their original opinions confirmed. Washington DC is a sewer and politicians are corrupt.

74 new_tommy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:03am

I don't know. This doesn't make things a whole lot better on the face of it. However, I'm going to invoke the 48 hour rule and am not going to say anything more about it for awhile until we learn a little more...

...unless something interesting comes up, of course. ;-)

75 Hooray for Captain Spaulding  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:09am
Some of us who have kids are outraged about this. Where is the moral leadership?


Thats a STUPID thing to say. Youre probably a fundie who thinks having a kid a year is "God's work" right? How's that for stereotyping?

You dont need to have children to be angered by this nonsense.

76 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:09am

Let your Pages do the walking through the yellow fingers.

77 xtraBilly  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:19am

Fake but accurate?

78 EC Marm  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:23am

#43 bbcrackmonkey

I don't understand why Charles is running stories on Foley, it has nothing to do with the WOT.


Because the WOT is over, we lose, if the Dems take control of the House and Senate. This is the kind of shiite that could cause that to happen.

79 OnlyFootprints  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:25am

No matter who we elect we always seem to end up with another mortal human messing things up.

80 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:27am

Whatever Foley is, it was known before. That this 'prank' breaks just weeks before a Federal election, where a number of races are must wins for the Republicans to keep this country sane, has to be one of the most evil attempts by the desperate dhummies I have seen in 68 years..and I am from Boston originally, and was, in my wayward youth, *gasp* a Dhummie, but I grew up.

It is the dhummies who should be running scared. I felt that Hastert must resign. Now? If all this chicanery can be proven? He should stay put.

81 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:32am

I remember back in the days before caller ID, we pranked a young co-worker by telling him we left his phone number in a bathroom stall at the SF airport.

We let some time go by, then called him as an overtly gay male pretending to solicit sex.

The poor schnook came out of his office, shaking and pale as a ghost, looking as if he was ready to eat the gun.

Wish I had that on video.

82 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:55:49am

A pederast pandering to a pretend catamite. What freakin' next!

83 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:56:06am

#56 bbcrackmonkey

He resigned and made up excuses because he really does have a thing for young boys and he's embarrassed (as he should be). *shrug* That's not the "prank."

The "prank" was the page(s) pretending they were interested in him back and egging him on. Ashton Kutcher's had actors do similar stuff on MTV.


And they would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those meddling adults!

84 MikeL  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:56:49am

#68 nigella:

Great. "Mar-roon" is from a cartoon. WGAS?

I'm glad I'm a mar-roon or moron or whatever because I'm upset that Foley was doing what he was doing and the leadership didn't do more to stop it.

I'm pretty disappointed that more on LGF aren't upset about this to and seem to be making excuses for Foley and his bosses. This isn't about red versus blue or democrat versus republican. It's about right versus wrong.

You just don't get it. Do you?

85 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:57:11am

"Politicians should have two terms: One in office and one in prison."

— Mark Twain

86 BH  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:57:27am

They baited him for sport. I f*cking hate teenagers. Too bad we can't draft them or convert them to Soylent Green.

And yes, he's still a perv.

87 samhein  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:57:35am

Let's just take Washington, throw "em ALL out and start over again!

88 bbcrackmonkey  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:57:55am

EC Marm, the Dems are already going to get Foley's seat, it's a forelorn conclusion. Foley's name is going to stay on the ballot because it's too late to change it.

Besides, since when does fighting the WOT have anything to do with defending the actions of a pedophilic congressman?

89 jehu  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:58:17am

I think the Dem's are now left with this:

"You drove a homosexual out of office, who commited no crime, and did not even have consensual sex with an 18 year old."

He was a lowlife that got punk'd by some Pages, sitting around laughing at his pathetic IM's. I just don't see this as a win for the Dems, and not a win for the GOP. Just lowers the reputation of both parties even lower. Even the stupidest homosexual (and most are on the high end of the bright scale) will see this as transparent gay-bashing by the party that says it is for gay marriage, gay rights etc. Just to win power. That is not going to be appreciated. And the gay community are big monetary givers to Dem politicians. Way to get in a circle and fire you guns Dems.

90 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:58:33am

#66 Fjordman

"If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure..."

So is camel urine OK if you don't sodomize the animal first? What do they do with it (or do I want to know...)?

91 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:58:52am
92 MandyManners  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:59:08am

#66 Fjordman

At first I thought you were joshing us but, you're not. Unfreakingbelievable!

93 Barbara Skolaut  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:59:10am
Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

Too late, methinks.

94 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:59:43am

Nearly everything posted at HuffingtonPost is Foley related.

The Democrats have finally found an issue that they can run with..."Vote the Gay pedophile Republicans out of office in November!".

95 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:00:28am

No Mike you don't get it. None of us as far as I know have made any excuses for Foley. He's a sicko., and I'm glad he's gone. My anger is at the "dirty tricks" right before every election that the Democraps do. I am genuinely worried that a Democratic congress could be the end of all of us. Maybe I'm being overly dramatic but I really believe we are in danger if that happens.

96 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:00:34am

#89 Jehu

Unfortunately, we're still left with Foley.

97 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:00:42am

#84 MikeL

I suppose I don't "get it". Particularly in the light of this new revelation. To me it seems as the sick, misued by the warped, capatalized on by the evil. In other words, business as usual in Washington.

98 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:00:56am

#88 bbcrackmonkey

Besides, since when does fighting the WOT have anything to do with defending the actions of a pedophilic congressman?

Who is defending his actions? Show me anyone who is defending his actions.

99 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:01:04am

#47 MikeL
"Maroon" is from old Bugs Bunny cartoons, FYI.

100 mad_scientist  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:01:05am
Same reason the folks on the Nightline "catch a pedophile" shows pretended to be 14-yo girls instead of middle-aged men--if you want to catch someone, you have to use bait that appeals to them


Then that would mean that this wasnt a joke, and they were trying to bait him into doing something wrong, which would mean the drudge story is wrong.

Sorry, it still seems weird to me. If it was a joke, why lie about your age in such a way that would make it criminal for the person you are trying to pull a prank on, if indeed it was a joke and not a hit job.

101 javems  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:01:07am

# 37 Fjordman

Khomeini thought all sex was ok, as long as it was done to a goat or a donkey, and then you sold the meat in another village.


No lions though.

102 yesandno  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:01:49am

What in effect might have been sexual harassment on the part of Foley...and it is inexcusable...may have taken on the charge of a "pervert" which is a whole different matter.

If the page was over 18 at the time, regardless of how unsavory it was, it was not criminal in the sense it was seduction of a minor...though I have trouble telling the difference on day makes (over age/under age) to any of this.

If Foley was so easily manipulated, he needed to resign. But that is a matter different then what this has become. Like Clinton, this started out with "sex". Nobody cared about that in a legal sense. Clinton's problem is then the cover up. NO matter how seedy his philandering was, once he lied under oath, it moved into another realm...which the Dems never understood since following the laws are for others, not them.

In this case, the sexual nature of the notes may or may not be criminal...the investigation should reveal this. But the attempted destruction of a gay Republican and the entire leadership of the party needs to be investigated and then libel laws should be pursued. The problem, of course, is that the page was a Republican...proving that Republicans have no tolerance for gay people...and don't be surprised when a Dem says this.


Dems are just totally useless when it comes to the truth...

103 Da Coyote  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:02:00am

Reading all of this whilst listening to the 4 PM EST news on CBS radio. What a joke. According to them, Hastert is "...trying to get out of an ever increasing scandal..." (not direct quotes, too many CBS lies to copy in real time). Seems they don't read Drudge. Oh, forgot. They're journalists. They don't read at all.

104 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:02:18am

86 BH

"They baited him for sport. I f*cking hate teenagers..."

One of the functions of teenagers IMHO is to test adults and if they get rid of the weak ones we are all better off.

I think this is part of G-d's plan for humanity.

105 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:02:33am

8 MikeL

The age of consent in DC is 16. There were no minors involved.

It was certainly inappropriate but not illegal.

This is no defense of Foley, but it should be clear, these young men were not minors.

106 rp1138  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:02:52am

#84 MikeL

"and seem to be making excuses for Foley"

Who here is doing this? The consensus here seems to be that Foley is a repugnant slimeball. I'd be hard pressed to find anyone here who disagrees with this thesis. I understand your anger over his behavior (regardless of whether it was legal or not), I don't understand your anger at the lgf'ers.

107 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:03:06am

#7 Black George Bush


Karl Rove strikes again :)

LOL! Karl Rove, you magnificent bastard! :)

108 Hooray for Captain Spaulding  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:04:01am
MikeL said: But it's still bad. Maybe you don't have kids. Maybe you just don't understand.

You keep digging that hole, dont you Fundie?

109 Darwin Akbar  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:04:13am

Another good example of the Democrats and their MSM cheerleaders, holding hands as they jump off the cliff of sanity into the abyss of irrelevance.

By the way, did anyone see that link on Newsbusters.org about the ever-disgraceful Bill Maher's take on this? He said only Republicans should suffer reproach for sex sandals since it holds itself out as "the party of morality" unlike "us."

I suppose that means that the Democrats must be the Official Party of Immorality. That's sure to motivate the electorate.

110 spider mensch  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:04:19am

some prank...I guess the old phone call pranks like this are long gone..


prankster:"Mr. Foley?"
Foley:"yes..?'
prankster:"this is technician Bob jones from the electric company. we've been having some problems in your area, so could you check to see if your refridgerator is running?"
Foley: "ok wait, I'll check...why yes it is..."
prankster: "well you better go catch it before it gets away...BWAHAHAH.."
Foley: "can I call you Bobby, technician Jones? what are you wearing right now? something loose?"
prankster:"errr..what?" Hangs up..

111 religion of bacon  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:04:44am

#84 MikeL

I'm pretty disappointed that more on LGF aren't upset about this to and seem to be making excuses for Foley and his bosses.

Some of us are very disappointed. If Foley were caught on video having sex with dogs, some people here would say "it's not fair that the Democrats waited until just before the election to release this" or "at least he didn't do it in the Oval Office like Clinton."

I'll still take the Republicans over the Dems, but the difference keeps shrinking...

112 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:05:43am

#110 spider mensch

LOL!

113 RadicalRon  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:05:43am

Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

Tough shit.

114 friarstale  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:05:44am

OT
current issue of US News and World Report has a cover that looks like GW Bush behind bars
[Link: www.usnews.com...]

the link has the cover pic small to the left, I don't have a bigger pic handy, but take a look at it when you're out and about; library, check-out line, wherever

am I imagining it? or is it a subliminal message?
he's behind a window, but it doesn't take much imagination to think of it as prison bars

115 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:05:58am

RE: Khomeini

So what! They have sex with goats. Have you seen their women?

Okay, maybe that goes too far.

But there is a reason they resent the pig as much as they do.

...okay, maybe that goes too far...

116 mad_scientist  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:06:41am
I'm pretty disappointed that more on LGF aren't upset about this to and seem to be making excuses for Foley and his bosses. This isn't about red versus blue or democrat versus republican. It's about right versus wrong.

I dont see many people outright making excuses for Foley. From what I have read people are still upset at him, and he is still a pervert that likes younger boys.

But we are all commenting on how it came about. Foley resigned, and it is over. now we need to look at the facts of the issue...

117 Dianna  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:06:47am

I have no interest in defending Foley. I'm glad he's gone, and if there is (yet another) brewing scandal about the Congressional Page program, perhaps it ought to be shut down.

What I do know is, this story has gotten too weird for me. It was weird from the start, but this is just too much.

A prank? What kind of congressman would participate in that kind of chat session? Some joke! It makes Foley not just a pervert but stupid, as OR points out.

Was anyone here a page? Does anyone have an insight?

118 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:07:39am

#100 mad_scientist


Sorry, it still seems weird to me. If it was a joke, why lie about your age in such a way that would make it criminal for the person you are trying to pull a prank on,

Teenagers lie about their age all the time, often for criminal ends (fake IDs, man). They were baiting the guy--if he liked young guys, saying they were 21 wouldn't be effect bait.


Surely JammieWF and I aren't the only people here who have ever pranked someone...

119 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:07:44am

Hey 84 Mike L

I'm upset at the whole thing. Throw them all out of office and quit wasting time.

Bleah.

120 bebe's boobs destroy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:08:55am

Re #56,

Boy the dems sure got those talking point responses to Drudge out fast. Or maybe somebody knew it was all gonna blowback, bad...

121 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:09:49am
So is camel urine OK if you don't sodomize the animal first?

Ahh, nobody's asked me about camel urine for a long time:

[Link: www.usc.edu...]

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 797:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

A group of people from 'Ukl (or 'Uraina) tribe ---but I think he said that they were from 'Ukl came to Medina and (they became ill, so) the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) she-camels and told them to go out and drink the camels' urine and milk (as a medicine).

[Link: www.media-watch.org...]

Q:Please tell us about your stay with (Pakistani politician) Qazi Hussain Ahmed

This sheik comes from a Bedouin family of southwestern Arabia. He had the habit of drinking camel urine and camel milk early in the morning. I asked him why does he do that? He replied that it is the family tradition as well as Islamic practice that is supported by Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). I was astounded. But Qazi explained to me that it is true. He told me three or four Hadiths in which the camel urine and camel milk drinking is suggested.

He bought a camel after coming to Pakistan. Three years later he had kidney stones problem. As per the doctor's advice he had to stop drinking the urine while he
continued the drinking camel milk. Doctor advised him to stop drinking the milk as well since the camel milk is rich in calcium compared to the cow milk. I think he stopped drinking any milk or milk products. But he had said that once JI comes to power in Pakistan, he will popularize the camel milk and camel urine drinking in Pakistan.

122 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:09:51am

Now that Foley has resigned, does his replacement have to be homosexual?

123 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:10:27am

OT

Wasnt today supposed to be the "Day of Rage" by the moonbats? Nothing seems to be hitting the radar.

124 RTLM  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:10:40am

This must be why the kid - whats-his-name, hired Timothy McVey's Attorney yesterday.

"Kid" uttters the proverbial: "Oh Sh*t!"

125 crabtree  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:11:15am

Newsflash!

Dems dig deep hole, fill with mud, and step in.

126 jehu  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:12:44am

Eric Cartman's Conscious 96

Unfortunately, we're still left with Foley.

Foley resigned. His name stays on the ballot. Only a Republican voter living the month before the election on the moon, will not understand his name represents the new named GOP candidate. I would not count on this being an automatic Dem seat now.

Upon his resignation, Foley had $2.7 million in campaign funds. Carl Forti, the communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said on October 1 that the committee would gladly accept Foley’s money to put towards other House races.

Which, I would guess can also go to his replacement. The Dems have nowhere this much cash. And of all irony, this is the district that has Palm Beach, where the 2000 election was decided. Would be beyond irony if this is again a Waterloo for Dems. Foley is disgusting, but the Dems are even MORE disgusting.

127 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:12:44am

Day of RPage.

128 soccerdad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:13:21am
Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos.

So the kid wasn't serious, wasn't gay, but was 'playing' with the 'unwitting' Foley. I don't see how this changes the fact that Foley typed this stuff to what he Thought was an underage page...

Still a sick bastard...

129 coulterclone  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:13:40am

#122 itellu3times

No, he just has to be stupid and cavalier. Sounds like a job for a Kennedy.

130 mad_scientist  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:13:40am

The more I follow politics, the more disgusted I become. Republican and Democrats alike have all been corrupted by the Washinton power scene. It is the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah...

Everyone has dirt on everyone else so nothing ever gets solved or investigated to a full conclusion. The fall guys are always the little fish, the big politicos can always blackmail their investigators to get out of trouble.

This was not the government our forefathers envisioned. Someday soon we will need to clean out Washington...I hope that when we diecide to do it the second amendment is still constitutional at that time.

131 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:13:44am

JOIN MY CABAL!

Babba, you're going to LOVE this site!

132 jemima  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:13:52am

#90 Heather Radish

You drink the camel urine. Yummm! And so refreshing!

Isn't it surprising what is halal?

(Drinking the Kool-Aid must be practice...)

133 Catttt  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:14:00am

Jordan Edmund is the kind of man who'd think dumping pig blood on Carrie at the prom would be great fun.

Jordan Edmund - the Billy Nolan of pages.

No wonder he's hired a criminal attorney an attorney who works for criminals a criminal-law attorney. That's the ticket.

134 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:14:00am

#126 Jehu

No disagreement here.

135 nonic  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:14:20am

#84 MikeL

One.

Teenagers need to know that there are scumbags out there who will be lookin' to mess around with them.

Teenagers need to recognize it when they hear it and know to say 'no' and tell some authority.

Being outraged that the scum exists may feel righteous, but educating the kids is a lot more effective.

Two.

To a very large extent, elected representatives are answerable only to their contituencies who voted them in.

If it were possible for the House or Senate membership, the party, or the leadership to force an elected representative out just because they felt something was scandalous, we wouldn't have an effective democracy.

136 new_tommy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:15:14am

OT.

How far away is Royal Oak from Dearborn Michigan, BTW? Is it real close? Is Royal Oak a suburb of Detroit?

Anyone know?

137 realwest  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:15:30am

#84 MikeL and your proof that his "bosses" knew all about it is ?

138 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:15:48am

133

ROTFLMAOPMP

139 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:15:49am
#131 Ben Hur 10/5/2006 01:13PM PDT
JOIN MY CABAL!

Babba, you're going to LOVE this site!

Ohhho ho hohoohoo HOO HOOO HOOHOOO AAAHHH!

140 NoSubmission  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:16:08am

123 Kragar (proud to be kafir)

I'm heading over to Union Square to pick up some photos of the loon rage festival and will post when I get home.

I know there are others videotaping and covering the UN leg of the seethe parade. Awaiting results..

141 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:16:38am

So what was the "enticement"? An invitation to the "hump of islam"?

142 coulterclone  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:17:42am

#130 mad...and from what era do you write? You could say the same thing about the congresses of 1796, 1836, 1856, 1936, 1966, 1976, etc etc etc.

OUr leaders suck, but, find a place where the government does a better job (FYI Disneyland doesn't count)

143 TMF  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:17:46am

Unless it was simply consensual homosexual online sex, and the kid is embarrassed and/or fearful of the effect on his career and wants to call it a "prank"

144 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:17:48am

#133 Cattt

His goose is also cooked. He has a myspace.com site that lists, among other things his political aspirations and his dislike of fat and stupid people.

I think he will now have to list himself among the second group.

145 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:19:06am

Would there be an uproar if he was straight and an 18 y/o female page was pranking him? Or do the donks have a problem with gays... gay republicans. that is.


Not a defense, I find the man abhorrent. However, we had a prez who actually, well, y'all know.

146 Chyron  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:20:04am

Watch the masses scramble for the latest gossip and scandal. See how they all claw for the chance to pry into another's personal life? Yes... it's quite the sight.

147 coulterclone  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:20:08am

#135 Point Two Example: Barney Frank

148 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:20:33am

I don't care how many "diversity training" sessions I'm forced to attend--I'm not drinking camel urine.

149 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:21:24am

You know, I begin to fear that we're now back on September 10th, and we will, someday soon, look back on this Foley scandal the same way we remember the Gary Condit scandal back in 2001.

Remember him?

The end of Ramadan is coming, folks.

(And what a dhimmified text about Ramadan they've got on GlobalSecurity.org, huh?)

150 Dianna  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:21:29am

#145 Murqtaad

I think anyone who attempts to take advantage of a young person working for them (that includes pages and interns) is a pervert.

With that, may I have a resounding "Yuck!"

151 Zevy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:21:31am

#136

Royal Oak is 10 miles due north of Dearborn, as a crow flies (or takes a bus).

152 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:21:40am

#135 nonic

Great post!

153 coulterclone  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:22:34am

It is written that the takers of camel urine find the shit of the bull of Islam becomes easier to swallow.

154 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:22:36am

#148 HeatherRadish

How do you know you're not already? Ever wonder what they put in Budweiser?

155 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:22:39am

Charles, what happened the story that some high-level Dem official knew about this some time back?

156 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:23:18am

Dreamy break,

With 2 out in the bottom of the ninth and trailing the Tigers 4-3, it looks like it's all on Johnny Damon's shoulders.

157 Chyron  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:23:58am
#148 HeatherRadish 10/5/2006 01:20PM PDT

I don't care how many "diversity training" sessions I'm forced to attend--I'm not drinking camel urine.

I thought it was Indians bathing in cow urine?

158 1560 SHP  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:24:16am

Dudes and dudettes,

I am as confused as a nursing baby in a topless bar.

This whole thing just defies logic.

/yeah, I know. What was I expecting?

159 javems  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:24:25am

Chyron

See how they all claw for the chance to pry into another's personal life? Yes... it's quite the sight.


We are becoming a nation of voyeurs. I was forced to sit through 5 minutes of Dr Phil the other day. Had to go take a shower.

160 rp1138  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:24:48am

#149 Dar ul Harb

I was thinking the same thing myself just last night.

I hope we're both wrong.

161 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:25:35am

I think everybody's missing something here.

Did ABC News authenticate these IMs? If they did, why did they not discover the "prank."

I wouldn't argue with people who say that Foley is scum and should be gone. I think it's an understandable position to take.

If ABC had done its job, would the young man need to hire Tim McVeigh's attourney?

I worry that this kid, for just doing what kids do, is caught between a rock and a hard place. He's either Foley's victim (embarrassing as it is), or he's just killed his chances of ascending in the ranks of the Republican party.

This kid is right in the middle of it.

And the Dems are using that for political gain.

So, I think this "scandal" has changed quite a bit, if this story is true.

162 NTropy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:25:42am

Not that I want it to be true but this sounds just a bit too much like a "Dallas" dream sequence.

163 theheat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:26:13am

According to the news yesterday, and then today, there is more than this first teen involved. It was also rumored that Foley tried to visit one of the teens in a page dormitory, or some such facility, a couple years ago, but was stopped by police. No one, yet, has turned up any campus police records to substantiate this.

The former page that was on the news last night said Foley had IM'd him and one of his friends, as well, and had records. The records shown on the news were from when they were adults, however. They said Foley had been corresponding with them like this since they first knew him in 1997, when both were still teenagers.

164 Catttt  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:26:55am

I just realized - the prank nature of this came out (no pun intended) because Jordan Edmund would rather be thought of as an insensitive homophobic twit than as gay.

No no! I'm not gay! I'm cruel and thoughtless!

165 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:27:03am

Dirk,

Dreamy choked.

Dianna,

That was pretty much what I was saying... I was thinking along the lines of, Democrats are hypocrites.

166 rcris5  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:27:05am

#131 Ben Hur

That is out ragious...funnny. One billion moose-lims under my "monkey" thumb? Count me in.

167 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:27:21am

#154 Earth2moonbat
#148 HeatherRadish

How do you know you're not already? Ever wonder what they put in Budweiser?

Rice. Which is why I don't drink it. *beer snob*

/flush twice, it's a long way to St. Louis!

168 TotallySirius  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:27:47am

Black republicans aren't really black,they are house n***rs(quoting Harry Belafonte)

Hispanic republicans aren't really hispanics,they are sellouts

Gay republicans aren't really gay,they are perverts.

Too bad Foley didn't give the page a cushy government job like that gay democrat governor,he'd really be in troub...


...nevermind.

169 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:27:56am
With that, may I have a resounding "Yuck!"

YUCK!

170 soccerdad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:28:12am

#new tommy - according to yahoo maps -- it is REAL close...like a mile or two north of detroit -- dearborn looks to be a little west of Detroit.

Why?

171 MandyManners  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:28:39am
#153 coulterclone

It is written that the takers of camel urine find the shit of the bull of Islam becomes easier to swallow.

That's funny! Gross but, funny.

172 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:29:19am

T.S. 168,

It's a 1 way street, ain't it?

173 new_tommy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:29:59am

#170 soccerdad

Thank you.

Why?

Just curious.

174 Dianna  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:30:28am

#165 Murqtaad

I figured. I just needed to get the resounding "Yuck!" that's been trapped in my head out.

175 THX-42  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:30:28am

Here's the basic problem. Democrat voters don't give a rip when THEIR Congresspmen/Senators/Presidents/etc. get caught commiting a crime or other socially unacceptable deed. This has been proven over and over again. For them, THE CAUSE TRUMPS THE CRIME.

On the other hand, for Republican/Conservative voters, such actions DO matter. They either vote out the perpetrator or stay away from the polls. And the Dems know this.

That is why the Dems continue to pull such crap, even when they are exposed. They know they got their 3-4 days of Repub-bashing headlines, and the rest is all irrelevant.

THe ONLY antidote is VOTE!

176 jehu  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:30:32am

Once again, since many here don't seem to understand the dynamic:

1. What Foley did is unchanged in character in that he was looking for sex with young men.


That does not change prank or no prank.


What changes now? The faux moral outrage of the Dems is uncovered...as exactly that...false. The minor they were hiding behind has been revealed to have been 18 years old, and he was pranking the gay congresman.

This reveals to all but the stupidest voters and the BDS crowd (that will never change even if the Islamists nuked NYC) that this was all political election season smearing.

It gives a black eye ALSO to the Dems, that were busy kicking out the crutches from the lame GOP, and laughing as it fell on the ground with broken bottles and glass strewn about.

Whenver the true nature or motives of the Dems are revealed, it is always worse than if aberrant behavior is revealed in the GOP.

Clinton was and is IN character of the LLL's. Foley is out of character to most of the GOP. They hate us because we DO have a moral code or principles we espouse, but only the Son of God EVER walked in such a code without failing.

In other words their hatred and condemnation is that we are NOT Jesus Christ, and how dare anyone even TRY to walk in moralilty. Even the attempt of someone trying to be moral is a threat to their whole worldview. They delight in the debasement of everyone, but most particularly anyone that tried to resist evil.

177 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:30:38am

#135 nonic

I would add to #2: It would be bedlam if the congress ever got into the business of removing members for "ethical violations" where they make up the rules on the fly. They can censure them for violating well-understood rules, they can prosecute them for breaking the law, and they can let their own constituants vote them out of office.

Unfortunately, if you look at Massachusetts, often the voters return criminals to congress, and local prosecuters fail to do their job, when the well-connected and powerful are involved.

But the alternative is worse. The alternative is a constant stream of phoney witchhunts, and rules made up on the fly, especially when control of congress is close.

So he's already resigned. That takes the whole business of reelection and censure off the table. All that's left is criminal prosecution. If he broke any laws, nail him. But I can think of more than one member of the Massachusetts delegation who should have faced charges a long time ago. But I know nothing is ever going to happen to them.

178 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:31:29am

#131 Ben Hur
I want my monkey back! I made one and e-mailed it to myself and the link has not shown up yet...
WAH!

179 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:31:50am

OT!

YANKEES LOST!

180 aunursa  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:32:14am

OT

Zogby poll gives Lieberman 20 point lead.

Based on these polls, I predict that the Democrats take the Senate by 51-49 ... and Lieberman will be the deciding vote.

Only 33 more days until Kos nuclear meltdown.

181 EC Marm  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:32:34am

#135 nonic
Good post. When my son lived here and was a young teenager, I would let him use my computer. I had it set up to record all online activity. I would then read his activity and then call him into my office. "Did you see this," I said. "This entry where someone is looking for pictures of young girls?" I gave him a long lecture about how people like that are predators and looking to get him in trouble. He looked really upset. I told him I was sure that he would watch out from now on. Also, while I was no longer going to record his online activity, that he should never forget privacy and security on computer systems is not something that he should ever assume.
I think he's just a few credits short of his doctorate now, in Computer Science. If kids are gonna learn, parents have to teach.

182 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:32:46am
183 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:33:26am
YANKEES LOST!

Amen!

184 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:33:34am
According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.


This, on its face, sounds quite incredulous.

185 javems  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:34:21am

Cattt

No no! I'm not gay! I'm cruel and thoughtless!


What crossed my devious mind is that the prank story could be cover.
My last official thought on the story.

186 FrogMarch  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:35:06am

Why did Foley resign so quickly?

187 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:35:44am

Amalie did you get a copy of my monkey?

188 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:08am

Cue the Twilight Zone music!

189 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:10am

#165 Murqtaad 10/5/2006 01:27PM PDT

Dianna,

That was pretty much what I was saying... I was thinking along the lines of, Democrats are hypocrites

It's called politics. It's been around forever.

Reminds me of Julius Caesar for some reason.

190 1560 SHP  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:10am

#186 FM

Maybe just because he was "outed?"

191 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:13am
#184 Amalie 10/5/2006 01:33PM PDT

According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.


This, on its face, sounds quite incredulous.

100% agree

192 Quintus_Arius  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:13am

Foley disgraced himself, got caught and resigned. Maybe he was entrapped. So what. I don't see any illegal activity.

Hastert should stay. The Dems would like to see him resign for political reasons. He has taken a reasonable position.

If something like this causes a Democratic takeover Foley's indisgression will be the least of my worries.

Conservatives, get out there and VOTE. Don't cut off your nose to spite your face. This is no time to be juvenile. THINK!

Some here think Republicans alone need to do Mea Culpas. To them I say, 'buzz off'.

193 soccerdad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:28am

#176 jehu -- WOW - nice observations - never thought of it that way, but is a really fine explanation.

I love coming here...learn something new every day!

194 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:52am

187 Babba

Let me check my inbox for a monkey..

Be right back..

:D

195 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:54am

Murqtaad,

Dirk,

Dreamy choked.

You bite you tongue, young man! Damon's batting .400 for the series. Today he was two for five with three RBI's and a homer.

Compare that to Alice Rodriguez. He had another one of his sterling postseason perfomances. He was zero for four and is batting .125 for the series.

196 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:36:59am
197 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:37:31am

#185 javems

AHH! The old double-double-double cross ploy.

/spoken with an Inspector Closeau accent

198 nonic  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:38:23am

#177 EArth

Everything you said.

Ditto.

:-)

199 zuckerlilly  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:38:38am

121 Fjordman

Ahh, nobody's asked me about camel urine for a long time:

But you know that human urine is a populare medicine in India but also in Germany/Austria/Switzerland.

When Morarji Desai was MP in India large groups of hindus waited every morning in front of his house for his morning-urine (to drink and/or for skin medicine).

In Europe human urine is used as alternative medicine by skin diseases.

200 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:39:03am

Babba

Where's your monkey? Is he upthread?

201 SlapLeather  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:39:12am

Despite the best of laid plans...

This isn't coming down as dem operatives planed.
Foley has been removed to a none hostile area. (he's scum but you can't talk to him)
The DSM (demstreammedia) has tried to force a brick house to fall like cards, AGAIN.
They are now faced with a rapid and full-scale investigation. (and the RNC is willing to let it fall where it may)
The DSM over played it's hand, pre-maturely elated and is now in panic mode.
The negotiations have begun.

202 harley2002  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:39:57am

#47 Mikel

I understand you being pissed off but the problem I have is how Foley is burned at the stake. While Democrats who have done the same or worse get away with it. Studds having sex with a 17 year old. Frank his "partner" selling sex out of his apartment and of course Kennedy "KILLING SOMEONE" for gods sake. There keeping there positions does not seem right.

By the way the spelling Maroon refers to old Bug Bunny cartoons where Bugs would say "What a maroon" instead of moron. I guess these cartoons were before your time. Maybe something from Captian Planet should have been used. LOL

203 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:40:01am

200 Amalie
No I made a monkey gram from Ben Hurs link, put our emails in, it said it took, and it never showed up.
A DINGO ATE MY MONKEY!

204 TotallySirius  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:40:51am

When an 18yr old gang banger shoots an innocent bystander the headline reads "man shoots bystander" but when its anything of a sexual nature the 18 yr old suddenly becomes "a teenager".

When a democrat senator is making "waitress sandwiches" out of 18 yr old waitresses its no big deal,but when a gay republican makes sexually explicit comments to an 18 yr old boy,he's a pervert.

WTF?

205 1560 SHP  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:40:56am

#199 Zucker etc.

And for those of use from where the rivers meet the seas...

It's also the best thing out there to take the sting out of a jellyfish attack.

But your wife/girlfriend still won't appreciate the offer.

206 LadyBird  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:41:12am

It's downright frightening who we have running this country. Our soldiers are risking their lives fighting for our existence over there and here we are talking about this crap. How discouraging.

207 LSD  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:41:43am

OT: Breaking
CAIR: FBI Training a Muslim Extremist?

Hussam Ayloush, leader of the Southern California brance of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is attending the “FBI Citizen’s Academy”.
[Link: www.fbi.gov...]

On September 7, Anti-CAIR (ACAIR) issued a “News and Analysis” titled “CAIR: Cops Training Terrorists?”
[Link: www.anti-cair-net.org...]

ACAIR called into question the FBI’s practice of inviting leaders from the business, religious and civic fields to attend the “FBI Citizen’s Academy” and how dangerous this could be, particularly if a Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) representative were to be invited.

Ayloush brags in his blog of his invite and mentions, in the first paragraph (Sept. 30):
[Link: hussamayloush.blogspot.com...]

“Through my work at CAIR, I get to interact closely
with the local FBI office, mainly on cases involving
hate crimes against Muslims or counter-terrorism.”

So, if Ayloush is correct, the FBI has worked with CAIR, a Muslim terrorist supporting organization, to help in the “War on Terror” in the field of counter-terrorism? (Ayloush didn’t mention just how he helped the FBI find Muslim terrorists, but maybe allowing the FBI to take a stroll through his blackberry helped?)

What must it be like for a newly-minted FBI agent to step into his/her first office, for their very first assignment, and look up and see Ayloush standing by to lend his “expertise” in fighting radical Islam? What would Ayloush tell the new agent? What possible constructive advice could a representative of a Muslim hate group offer? What about the veteran FBI agent, who knows the truth about CAIR and is shocked at the FBI leadership’s close relationship with CAIR? What a slap in the face…

While we can’t speak for FBI agents, ACAIR can’t help but believe that J. Edgar Hoover must be spinning in his grave. Can anyone imagine the FBI holding hands with NAZI’s during World War II?

ACAIR wonders just how CAIR successfully co-opted whichever FBI agent was so clueless, so ignorant or just simply stupid enough to invite America’s leading Islamic hate group to participate in a program designed to help protect America from…Islamic hate groups.

This begs several questions:

1. When the next CAIR official is arrested on Islamic terrorism related charges, how will the FBI explain its cozines with Ayloush?
2. How do field FBI agents feel, knowing that their superiors are fawning over the very group that supports those they are fighting?
3. How many terror attacks on America, or her allies, must occur before the FBI removes its rose-colored glasses and sees the obvious for what it is, i.e., that CAIR is no friend of the FBI, never has been, never will be?

How many Americans live’s are in danger, how much will the radical Islamic movement gain by having a CAIR representative help the FBI in counter-terrorism?

No amount of spin will protect the FBI from the righteous indignation of the American people when this arguably treasonous act is exposed.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations is a clear and present danger to the United States, why is this news to the senior leadership of the FBI, but not to field agents ...?

208 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:42:26am
209 Judith  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:43:07am

Hm...page involved is outed as gay, or least shown to be experimenting with gay sex, if he can't come up with a good explanation. Claiming it was all a prank is a good excuse that some might buy.

I don't. Happy career in homophobic USA. If this person wnats to remain in politics I recommend a move north and take up politics in Canada where being gay basically makes us Canuks yawn with disinterest generalized disinterest.

I also don't think this excuses Mark Foley. He's a still a sicko predator preying on children. 18 may be technically legal but it is a still a child predator when the other partner is two decades or more older.

Child predators should be executed.

210 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:43:07am

Babba

Did you email it to yourself? It takes a little bit of time. It will work.

211 Fatal  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:43:14am

I don't see folks defending Foley and I sure as heck am not going to do so.

However, I see lots of people saying, this would be okay if the kid was over 18, but if he was a few days short of his 18th birthday, its pedophilia, etc.

Where is the age of 18 coming from? I am just curious, because the age of consent in Oregon is 16. That's right, its only a crime to have consensual sex with another person if they are under the age of 16.

Is there really a lot of difference between a 17 yr old male (who can enlist in the military with parental permission) and an 18 yr old male? Neither one is going to be pre-pubiscient. And isn't that the whole thing about pedophilia, its adults who get sexually aroused by pre-pubiscient kids?

The whole thing is creepy as hell, Foley should definately resign, but if its just teenagers punking a creepy old "fag" from Florida, it hardly rises the the level of national crises, culture of corruption, FBI and Congressional investigations, etc.

The Dems "October surprise" is getting to be a lot like Christmas (another dirty word) these days, it comes earlier and earlier every year!

212 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:43:30am

#203 BabbaZee 10/5/2006 01:40PM PDT

200 Amalie
No I made a monkey gram from Ben Hurs link, put our emails in, it said it took, and it never showed up.
A DINGO ATE MY MONKEY!

I'm BUMMED! I love monkeys.

213 Dustoff-507  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:43:59am

I don't know if I should laugh or cry?

It's hard to believe this.

I sure hope so. Watch the dem's go bonkers if it turns out to be a prank.

214 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:45:12am

#210 Ben Hur
Yes I did. Still nada. Wah!


#208 buzzsawmonkey
Amen to your whole post.

215 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:45:45am

#202 harley2002

the problem I have is how Foley is burned at the stake. While Democrats who have done the same or worse get away with it.

Agree. But I don't think letting Foley ooze away unscathed (coming on to subordinates in a workplace is textbook sexual harassment) is the proper rectification. Congresspeople committing sexual crimes should be staked regardless of party affiliation.

I also want a pony and a million dollars and a flying car.

216 Silhouette  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:45:50am

Foley should be gone. And he is gone. Pretty much case closed.

One gets the impression that certain people were geared up for a big fight for his removal, and when he just went, they want more. Now, along the lines of demanding Rummy quit over Abu Ghraib, they want a boss of some sort to go too. They'd like everyone with an R beside their name to quit in mass shared shame, but they'll settle for one or two. Like buying a car and asking if they'll throw in the radio upgrade. "You gotta give me the upgrade." As long as you got what you want, try to get more.

Similar to demanding an apology, getting one, but then demanding a better one and issuing a fatwa anyway.

217 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:46:19am
218 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:46:31am

#212 Amalie
Judah Ben Hur says I must be patient.
My monkey is in transit, LOL!

219 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:47:11am

There was a link to the guy's (Foley's IM chat buddy) blog. He's only 21 years old. He was trying to be cool by writing about where he is currently working, a republican gubernatorial race and going to school in S Cal.

He put tried to be funny by saying... "hey, I'm just an asshole."

He may want to change this line because now there are several connotations involved.

220 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:47:40am

I find it highly "interesting" to say the least that the same liberals who are now pointing and screaming HOMOSEXUAL PERVERT! are the very same people who would gladly send them off into the woods to spend the night with Boyscouts.

/I'm just sayin'

221 Mirage  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:48:02am

If nothing else... prime example of why the 48 hour rule is a good one. This thing has morphed so many times I've lost track of who did what when and where and why. Now, we learn it was a prank, they were more like 17-18 contrary to how they were originally portrayed... what next?

222 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:48:19am

217 tfk

Thanks man. I'll tune into Hannity & Colmes tonight.

223 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:48:56am

Monkey... mooonnnkeeeyy... where are you?

Holds out banana...

224 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:49:15am

#215 HeatherRadish

Has he committed a crime? From what I have read this kid was 18 at the time ... or almost 18. And he was in DC at the time, no? Where the age is 16? I am not sure about his location at the time.

I think at Foley is out for being icky not illegal.

225 Florida Lady  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:50:12am

#88 bbcrackmonkey

"the Dems are already going to get Foley's seat, it's a forelorn conclusion."

I wouldn't be so sure about that . . . I live in the district right next to Foley's. People in the Sw Florida portion of his district are not stupid, and they're certainly not liberal.

226 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:50:22am

#221 Mirage 10/5/2006 01:48PM PDT

If nothing else... prime example of why the 48 hour rule is a good one. This thing has morphed so many times I've lost track of who did what when and where and why. Now, we learn it was a prank, they were more like 17-18 contrary to how they were originally portrayed... what next?

The truth?

/I would have to buy a case of Snickers bars to wait that one out

227 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:50:51am

Great email I received from a fellow Cabal member:

MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR NEXT SATURDAY.
As you may already know, it is a sin for a Muslim male to see any woman other than his wife naked, and that he must commit suicide if he does. So next Saturday at 4 PM. EDT all American women are asked to walk out of their house completely naked to help weed out any neighborhood terrorists. Circling your block for one hour is recommended for this anti-terrorist effort.All men are to position themselves in lawn chairs in front of their house to prove they are not Muslims, and to demonstrate they think it's okay to see nude women other than their wife and to show support for all American women. Since Islam also does not approve of alcohol, a cold 6-pack at your side is further proof of your anti-Muslim sentiment.The American government appreciates your efforts to root out terrorists and applauds your participation in this anti-terrorist activity.It is your patriotic duty to pass this on.

228 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:51:04am

This sounds... squirrelly. And lame.

I feel like I'm getting punked by lame squirrels.

229 BabbaZee  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:51:14am

#223 Amalie
Ahhahahhaaa.

If he comes, post him here.
I have to go hold out a bananna to the husband... time to make the dinner!

230 unreconstructed rebel  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:52:00am

#227 Ben

WooHoo!

231 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:52:04am

#225 Florida Lady 10/5/2006 01:50PM PDT

#88 bbcrackmonkey

"the Dems are already going to get Foley's seat, it's a forelorn conclusion."

I wouldn't be so sure about that . . . I live in the district right next to Foley's. People in the Sw Florida portion of his district are not stupid, and they're certainly not liberal.

A forelorn conclusion...

lol...

232 Judith  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:52:28am

beblebrox - I personally see nothing whatsoever wrong with a man being gay and don't think it should interfere in any aspect his life including being a boy scout leader.

Of course, I define gay as "man interested in another man" only. No gay man as I define it would have the slightest interest in pursuing a boyscout. And I define "Man interested in a boy, child or other person below someone in a position of power" as a pedophilic predator.

You may not care to make the distinction, but I do.

233 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:52:41am

Babba

Okay... I'll keep an eye out for your cute little monkey.

234 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:53:01am

#208, buzzsawmonkey

Good analysis.

235 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:53:28am

#224 wintercat

Yeah, after I posted I realized I suggested Foley committed a crime, and I didn't mean to (although I'm not altogether sure about some of these new "electronic communications with minors" laws). He's out because he's icky in a way that interferes with business.

Just like Frank, Stubbs, et al should be (have been) out, and weren't.

#220 beblebrox
Yeah, I think this says a lot more about the psychology of the left than the psychology of the right.

236 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:53:58am

#227 Ben Hur 10/5/2006 01:50PM PDT

Great email I received from a fellow Cabal member:

MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR NEXT SATURDAY.
As you may already know, it is a sin for a Muslim male to see any woman other than his wife naked, and that he must commit suicide if he does. So next Saturday at 4 PM. EDT all American women are asked to walk out of their house completely naked to help weed out any neighborhood terrorists. Circling your block for one hour is recommended for this anti-terrorist effort.All men are to position themselves in lawn chairs in front of their house to prove they are not Muslims, and to demonstrate they think it's okay to see nude women other than their wife and to show support for all American women. Since Islam also does not approve of alcohol, a cold 6-pack at your side is further proof of your anti-Muslim sentiment.The American government appreciates your efforts to root out terrorists and applauds your participation in this anti-terrorist activity.It is your patriotic duty to pass this on.

Yeah... that sounds like a plan..

lol.

237 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:54:05am

Dirk,

Alice just hasn't been the same since Dimples took Jeter away...

/I would like to be a fly on the wall in that there locker room. Must be better than a trip to The Manhole.

238 unreconstructed rebel  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:54:18am

Time to roll down the cover!

239 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:54:29am

#186 FrogMarch

Why did Foley resign so quickly?


The more I think about it this situation was incredibly unfair and embarassing to Foley, he has being teased, egged on and joked about by his interns. Also it seems that his gayness, which was an open secret, was now on the headline of every newspaper.
If you think about this story with traditional hetero sex roles there's really nothing that doesn't go on every day in every business, board room, and college clasroom in the country.

240 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:55:59am

#209 Judith

If this person wnats to remain in politics I recommend a move north and take up politics in Canada where being gay basically makes us Canuks yawn with disinterest generalized disinterest.

Until one party sees a way to get some milage out of it. Then, it'll be in your face.

Stereotypes notwithtanding, Canaddians and Europeans can be as homophobic and as misomynistic as they need to be to get their political aims achieved. I've seen some unbelievable misogynistic material the BBC was playing prior to the Thatcher election, because they couldn't use anything else against her.

So, get of your high horse. You're not superior.

241 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:56:02am

#41 Earth2moonbat 10/5/2006 12:47PM PDT

It doesn't change anything wrt Foley. It does change things wrt the demos and the MSM. This latest revelation is all about the demos and the MSM, and not about Foley.

Huh? If Drudge is to be believed, Republican pages knew about Foley's behavior, and told no one about it (parents?) I love the Drudge spin though: "The prank went awry", as if to say that it would have been better to keep the evidence that they have a perv congressman on the hill a secret. Drudge doesn't elaborate about 'political operatives favorable to Dems', but it's interesting that he didn't write 'operatives favorable to keeping pervs away from congressional pages'.

I'll keep my eyes peeled though. I just know those 'donks' did something!

242 Ojoe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:56:18am

Why doesn't Foley's office order bookmarks?

Because they just bend over the pages.

243 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:56:38am

The MSM is now the Tabloid Media.

244 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:57:21am

235 HeatherRadish
I know, I did not understand why Stubbs got a pass.


232 Judith
I am with you on the gay issue.

245 Ben Hur  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:57:27am
246 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:57:33am

239 Killgore

I'm going to wait to find out why Foley tucked tale and fled to the nearest rehab. Within 24 hours his attorneys were floating the various "I was a victim too" excuses.

So far he was:

molested by a clergyman between the ages of 13-15

So far he is:

Gay

An Alcoholic

247 Dustoff-507  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:58:47am

#228 Amalie


I feel like I'm getting punked by lame squirrels.


I'm shocked I tell-ya, just shocked! 0-:

248 HeatherRadish  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:58:59am

#239 Killgore Trout

If you think about this story with traditional hetero sex roles there's really nothing that doesn't go on every day in every business, board room, and college clasroom in the country.

Oh hell, think about it with traditional gay sex roles. The "daddy-boy" relationship is as classic as "butch-femme." If Foley had been soliciting kids he met outside of work, no scandal.

249 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 11:59:17am

211 Fatal

I already mentioned above, the age of consent in Washington is 16 too.

The emails/IM's are not that explicit as to constitute pornography and the young men "were of age" so there is no criminal activity involved.

I also don't want to defend Foley but he is not a pedophile. That would only be having sex with underage children. These were young but not under age and there is no evidence he had sex or even solicited sex --at least not so far.

250 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:00:44pm
I'll keep my eyes peeled though. I just know those 'donks' did something!

You let us know what you find out... and give Treez a big up for me.

251 funkyfantom  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:01:23pm

The last five-term Democrat to pork pageboys
was named "Studds".

The House Majority leader is named "Boehner".

Beavis and Butthead, where are you now that we need you?

252 lurking faith  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:01:31pm

If I'm repeating somebody else's point, I apologize; I don't have time to read the whole thread.

But...
If this is a hoax, it seems much more likely to me that the page typed up those IMs himself, rather than convincing Foley to write them.

Assistants normally have at least some of their boss's passwords. Or have access to their boss's office and could take advantage of a boss who carelessly did not log out when leaving for a while.

Don't get me wrong; Foley's quick resignation does imply that there is something he doesn't want found - although it's not impossible that he just doesn't want to drag out the fight and possibly maximize damage to his own party. But the prank idea is just so... juvenile. Could he be that much of a childish twerp and have nobody notice it before?

253 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:02:01pm

#232 Judith

I do make the distinction, my point was that it seems that when politics is served, the Dems don't seem to make the distinction, or at the very least this is a base ploy to play on public fears and preconceptions that in other circumstances they would be wildly condemning.

254 bweep  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:02:53pm

We were in the Oval office and the cigar box fell on the floor. Miss Lewinsky bent over to pick one up and i tripped over the box. I reached forward to steady myself and my finger caught her underwear. As I tumbled, her pants came down and the cigar I was holding stuck up her ass...and that's when my wife walked in...

Muslims are seething in Jack Straw's constituency and on TV the BBC are condemning him utterly.

255 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:03:43pm

#246 Amalie

Has it occurred to anyone that he feels unbelievably stupid and used, and is just trying to run away from the spotlight? Not everyone has the "stand and fight" instinct; some have the "head for the hills" instinct. This isn't as mysterious as a lot of people are making it out to be. The guy is just a coward. Sometimes it's just as simple as that.

256 beblebrox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:04:45pm

#232 Judith

However I do think it's as bad an idea to send a gay man out with a bunch of teenage boys as it would be to send a straight man out with a bunch of teenage girls. Best to avoid situations where bad things that people of all stripes will later regret.

257 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:04:56pm

239 Killgore Trout

The more I think about it this situation was incredibly unfair and embarassing to Foley, he has being teased, egged on and joked about by his interns.

I looked at this "kids" website on myspace.com. Here's a link to the site that found out who the page was:

[Link: passionateamerica.com...]

Scroll down for a copy of the page's myspace website.

Also, Passionate America says he's been getting hate mail. I'd like to know from whom.

258 mattm  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:05:33pm

How much linger before the Dems begin to drop the issue.

259 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:05:57pm

Amalie (#228),

I feel like I'm getting punked by lame squirrels.

Yet the vaunted investigative journalists who "broke" the story will tell you they were too stupid to figure it out, so don't feel bad.

260 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:07:13pm

All this talk of Studds and Boehner got me reminiscing from the Clinton era, when the Chinese spy case was investigated, with the ensuing Cox and Dicks report.

Whodathunkit? A Clinton scandal involving Cox and Dicks, but no sex.

261 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:07:14pm

245 Ben Hur

LOL... I did it!

262 harley2002  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:07:22pm

#215

I did not mean Foley should keep his job. I ment the others I mentioned should have been booted also and they were not..

263 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:08:57pm
#258 mattm 10/5/2006 02:05PM PDT

How much linger before the Dems begin to drop the issue.

They're busy creating the next fraud to, ahem, MoveOn to.

264 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:09:07pm

#255 Earth2moonbat 10/5/2006 02:03PM PDT

#246 Amalie

Has it occurred to anyone that he feels unbelievably stupid and used, and is just trying to run away from the spotlight? Not everyone has the "stand and fight" instinct; some have the "head for the hills" instinct. This isn't as mysterious as a lot of people are making it out to be. The guy is just a coward. Sometimes it's just as simple as that.

E2M!

He's a Congressman! And yes, he was probably was used and also very, very stupid. We don't need no stinkin cowards in Congress.

265 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:10:43pm

This is the bullshit of all bullshits!
/Mooj

266 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:10:44pm

This is getting ridiculous. If it turns out that he broke the law, NAIL HIM, but based on what we currently know, he broke no laws.

Carry on.

267 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:10:49pm

#250 Murqtaad 10/5/2006 02:00PM PDT

You let us know what you find out... and give Treez a big up for me

Done

268 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:11:18pm

#259 Geepers 10/5/2006 02:05PM PDT

Amalie (#228),

I feel like I'm getting punked by lame squirrels.

Yet the vaunted investigative journalists who "broke" the story will tell you they were too stupid to figure it out, so don't feel bad.

Geeps

We are still getting punked. I don't like being perpetually punked, Geepers.

269 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:12:37pm

chenzhen 267,

Good job. He's a superstar.

270 edr  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:12:38pm

Hmmm.

Now it's being reported that Hastert hasn't asked the FBI to investigate the case because Democrats have asked him not to!

WTF!? Hey Hastert! Grow a damn spine will ya?!

271 jill e  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:12:49pm

#252

Have you seen his pages "farewell" speech where he talks about hoping he won't cry? Blegh! I don't know how someone couldn't see that he was a bit of a drama queen (pardon the reference) from that! Made me cringe . . .

272 wintercat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:12:58pm

264 Amalie

We don't need no stinkin cowards in Congress.

Well, then we'd better empty the place.

273 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:13:27pm

Huh?

I want to know what Denny Hastert knew about this and when!

274 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:13:33pm

#264 Amalie

He's a Congressman! And yes, he was probably was used and also very, very stupid. We don't need no stinkin cowards in Congress.

I'm not disagreeing. I'm glad he's gone. We don't need his like. All I'm saying is that the immediate resignation isn't the smoking gun that so many are making it out to be. There are explainations for that that don't require a massive conspiracy and cover-up.

/Occam's razor

275 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:15:27pm

#273 J.D.

I want to know what Denny Hastert knew about this and when!

I want to know what ABC knew and when...

276 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:15:32pm

#272 wintercat 10/5/2006 02:12PM PDT

264 Amalie

We don't need no stinkin cowards in Congress.

Well, then we'd better empty the place.

LOL >>>> LOL

277 so.cal.swede  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:16:31pm

#256 beblebrox

Now wait a minute, you're making the assumption that all gay men are pedophiles, and then you try to cover your arse, pun not intended, and say that all straight men are pedophiles too?

The correct way to cover yourself is to say that you wouldn't send a straight pedophile with teenage girls, as you wouldn't send a gay pedophile with teenage boys.

278 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:16:34pm

It's being reported that the Republicans have asked... wait for this.. Louis Freh...

279 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:16:51pm

ChenZhen,

Both Lupe Fiasco and Vinny Paz from Jedi Mind Tricks are muslims. Lupe is a faux christian (meaning he thinks mohammed was christ like, which he wasn't). Vinny Paz is a violent jihad wanna-be. Both are morons. JMT sounds good, but like I said, it's a moron on the mic.

280 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:17:00pm
281 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:17:25pm

Sorry, laughing..

Republicans have asked Louis Freh to investigate the matter..

282 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:17:33pm

#275 E2m
It's sorta like Fitzmas in October for them.

283 Mirage  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:17:55pm

#226 Amalie

Feeling a-salted by nuts? :)

(I know... horrible joke)

284 righthanded  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:17:56pm

It looks like the guy who outed Foley was also trying to blackmail another Senator:

From his website: [Link: www.blogactive.com...]

This post will be read by thousands and thousands of people... It's directed at ONE person.

Mr. Senator:

Tomorrow you will be faced with a vote that may have the longest aftereffects of any other you have cast in your Senate career.

Tomorrow you will decide if your political position is worth more than doing what is right for others like you. For others like you, Mr. Senator, who engage in oral sex with other men. (Although, Mr. Senator, most of us don't do in the bathrooms of Union Station!) Your fake marriage, by the way, will NOT protect you from the truth being told on this blog.

How does this blog decide who to report on? It's simple. We report on hypocrites. In this case, hypocrites who vote against the gay and lesbian community while engaging in gay sex themselves*.

When you cast that vote, Mr. Senator, represent your own...it's the least you could do.

Michael Rogers
blogACTIVE.com

*While votes on many matters are considered, votes "FOR" either the Alito nomination and the Federal Marriage Amendment are enough to qualify legislators for reporting on this site.

Ladies and Gentlemen... if they want a cultural war, I'll give them a fucking cultural war. Fasten your seatbelts, it's gonna be a bumpy 2006."

UPDATE: Some of you have asked if he will be outed tomorrow. No. The blog will report on this closeted Republican Senator between tomorrow and a time when it may most impact the reelection effort of the Senator. Just because the Democratic establishment has given up the fight for our Nation, doesn't mean this site will...


IT LOOKS LIKE FOLEY WOULD BE HIS NEXT TARGET:

[Link: www.blogactive.com...]

285 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:19:13pm

280 buzzsawmonkey

Au contraire

As for the "honorable" way out... within 24 hours of checking into rehab Foley's attorneys were floating the "Victim excuse" of how Foley was molested as a teen. That he was gay and an alcoholic.

That's ass covering work by his lawyers.

286 so.cal.swede  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:19:55pm

#252 lurking faith

Well let's say the emails were legit.. I could see a kid going to the next step with his buddies and saying "lets make up some pervo IM sessions, it'll be fun".

But then, it might have just been that the kid thought "let's just see what happens if i encourage him" and 'accidentally' walked into the arms of a pedophile.

287 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:21:41pm

284 righthanded

Now this... is very, very interesting...

288 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:23:54pm

284 righthanded

Who is this Mike Rogers person? Could he be a Lone Gay Ranger trying to out congressmen like Foley?

289 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:24:39pm

284 righthanded

Oh my. That makes me sick.

290 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:25:58pm

#284 righthanded
Is that real? Can it be verified? Is it a joke? Am I being stupid? Could I ask any more questions?

291 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:26:46pm

#284 righthanded
Where did you come across that?

292 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:26:49pm

290 Kilgore

Someone needs to save a file on that blog before it disappears..

Can you do this?

293 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:27:04pm
294 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:27:43pm

Amalie (#288),

Read about Mike Rogers over at Sweetness & Light.

Several articles - scroll down.

295 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:27:45pm

#286 so.cal.swede

Well let's say the emails were legit.. I could see a kid going to the next step with his buddies and saying "lets make up some pervo IM sessions, it'll be fun".

That's a very real danger. These logs can very easily be fabricated, and can't be authenticated. This may be the start the biggest trend in phoney evidence since repressed memory.

296 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:30:33pm

This all makes sense now. Pages pull cruel joke on Foley, have a good laugh at his expense. Share IMs with friends, nave more laughs at Foley's expense. Sooner or later, Bonkey gets ahold of IMs being passed around and, in turn, passes the IMs up the Bonkey food chain. Bonkey political operatives scheme and plot, as they're wont to do. Bonkey operatives feed the IMs to the MSM on the last day of the Congressional session and pat themselves on the back for their unleashing of this year's "October Surprise". Much slapstick and hilarity ensues.

/the page who [expletive deleted] started all this, if he doesn't want to be singlehandedly responsible for losing Congress, had better do himself and the Republican party a huge favor, not listen to his newly hired lawyer, call a press conference, and fess up to the whole nine yards and soon!

297 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:30:36pm

Just so it is handy in this thread, here is the actual --full text -of the message from ABC>

This is apparently the exchange with Jordan Edmund.

Actual messages unedited: [Link: abcnews.go.com...]

298 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:30:54pm

#294 Geepers

When we get closer to the mid-term elections, I am sure more will surface.

Gun with smoke...

299 ronaldusmagnus  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:32:30pm

#270 edr

I suggest it is also the Democrats who lack spines on this. An FBI investigation will not be restricted to Republican actions only. It will look under EVERY rock, including the rocks marked with a "D".

The last time the Democrats demanded investigations, reporters went to jail, and their anti-Bush buddy at State had to fess up to blabbing about some insignificant CIA employee. They wanted Republican blood and all they got was scrambled eggs.

I support a full investigation by the FBI. I suspect dirtbags and pederasts will be found on both sides of the aisle. Time to clean 'em out.

300 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:32:55pm

293 buzzsawmonkey

Okay, I'll accept his resignation as honorable. After all I haven't seen any such thing to the Left of the aisle.

Gary Condit comes to mind.

301 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:34:26pm

Anyone know what this is about? The apparently ran the story on line but now have pulled it offline. I checked for it but it is gone.

Tuesday, Oct 03 --ABCNews.com Pulls Foley Sexuality Story
ABCNews.com has pulled a story off about ex-Florida Republican Congressman Mark Foley's sexuality by a writer who outed Foley's homosexuality 10 years ago in the Advocate.
The story by J. Jennings Moss, a freelance writer and former senior editor at ABCNews.com, was published late Friday afternoon. Moss says he was contacted by ABC when news of Foley's sexually explicit messages to underage Congressional pages surfaced.

This was the source: [Link: www.mediabistro.com...]

302 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:34:50pm

#296 Killian Bundy

Exactly. We all know how Bonkeys can't keep what they see as imcriminating evidence from the MSM, even when it's illegally wiretapped. Ask Jim McDermott.

303 Judith  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:36:41pm
So, get of your high horse. You're not superior.

-Looking down disdainfully from the old "high horse"-

Let's see. We had an openly gay MP who did multiple terms and got the boot when he turned out to be a thief, not because he was gay. We had an openly gay mayor in Winnipeg who went into federal politics at the invitation of our Liberal party because of his popularity. The electorate here generally doesn't care about gayness or lack thereof for the most part. Yes, we have our homophobes but a homophobe is more likely to get drummed out of politics than a gay person is up here. So yeah, on this point we are indeed superior.

I can't comment on Europe but it generally isn't a good idea to generalize Canadian attitudes with Europeans. We aren't like Europeans on a whole lot of issues.

Feel free to disagree with my opinion if you wish.

304 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:36:51pm

294 Geepers

Thanks Geeps..

305 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:37:04pm

#292 Amalie
Done. it's been up for about 6 months so I don't think it's going anywhere but I saved it just in case. What I'm thinking is that it could have been directed at foley himself and what we're seeing now is the result.
Maybe we should let Charles know about this.

306 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:37:14pm

#299 ronaldusmagnus

I support a full investigation by the FBI. I suspect dirtbags and pederasts will be found on both sides of the aisle. Time to clean 'em out.

Yup. You want to play that way, we can play that way.

307 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:38:04pm
308 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:38:22pm

In the message --the young man in the caption of this thread does mention his last girlfriend to Foley.

Foley knew he wasn't gay.

309 Thriggle  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:39:33pm

I'm just surprised the Foley "scandal" is still front-page news for every newspaper. I could see it being mentioned in national newspapers once, and after that followed by local media in Foley's home state. It's not nearly important enough to be national news every day.

Media doesn't have much else to run with, I guess. Israel's upholding UN resolutions, and Iraq is doing fairly well.

310 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:40:15pm

305 Kilgore

Geepers posted a link to Sweetness and Light.. where they have posted Roger's blog and a piece about him.. but yeah.. it's pertinent to all things Foley..

So go ahead and send it to Charles...

311 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:40:34pm

#309 Thriggle
But we don't know who's really the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby, do we?

/do we need to?

312 Cali White Bear  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:40:35pm

Whatever.

the political damage is already done, and part of the damage is the idiotic and stupid way in which the member from Animal Farm has handled it.

it doesnt matter anymore whether every detail of this is true or not...people believe it to be true because too many members of congress have made it easy to believe the worst case scenarios about congressional misconduct.

on election day, Dems pick up at least 25 seats.

313 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:41:26pm

#303 Judith

This is not about homosexuality, this is about pederasty. Did your openly gay MPs have relations with teenagers? If so, was it considered ok? If so, you're a sick country.

314 slaphappy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:41:31pm

#66-fjordman...

i just puked up my feijoada...lol

cheers...

315 Fatal  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:41:44pm

so.cal.swede

Care to tell us what your definition of what a pedophile is? Because frankly, engaging in cybersex with a 17 or 18 yr old is not really indicative of a pedophile to most people.

Or, maybe it depends on how old the other party is? Or WHO the other party is?

Do you have a problem with an 18 yr old having cyber-sex with their 17 yr old girlfriend? Is the 18 yr old a "pedophile"?

Or is it just 50 yr old Republican congress-people who are "pedophiles" in that situation?

Creepy? Yes. Pedophillic - ? ? ?

316 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:41:50pm

#312 Cali White Bear

on election day, Dems pick up at least 25 seats.


I'll bet not.

318 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:44:43pm

#279 Murqtaad 10/5/2006 02:16PM PDT

ChenZhen,

Both Lupe Fiasco and Vinny Paz from Jedi Mind Tricks are muslims. Lupe is a faux christian (meaning he thinks mohammed was christ like, which he wasn't). Vinny Paz is a violent jihad wanna-be. Both are morons. JMT sounds good, but like I said, it's a moron on the mic

I honestly don't know anything about those guys, and I hadn't heard of them until I read that thread. I just posted your 'up' in there because I knew Treez would read it. I'm sure he'll be honored.

319 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:46:06pm

Seriously, do that many people vote strictly along party lines anymore?

320 SlapLeather  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:46:26pm

The RNC said ok DRAW...damn the torpedoes/full steam ahead.

We'll let them fall where they may!

The DNC said on second thought...where is my fwench hanky...

The negotiations have begun.

321 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:46:32pm
322 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:47:33pm
323 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:47:35pm
#312 Cali White Bear

part of the damage is the idiotic and stupid way in which the member from Animal Farm has handled it.

I assume you mean Hastert. What was he supposed to do? He found out about the IMs the same time we all did on Friday. Foley was told to resign later that day.

on election day, Dems pick up at least 25 seats.

Give up if you want, I won't.

/the stakes are too [expletive deleted] high

324 Quintus_Arius  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:47:38pm

Slice and dice Foley any way you want, William Jefferson Clinton is still the 'gold standard'.

325 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:48:10pm

I saw where Gordon was on another thread crowing that Dean was going to be the next president cause Dean was "moral."

If we are going to vote for the most moral person then let's put Billy Graham on the ticket.

Billy Graham against Dean.

lol

326 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:48:15pm

RE: #284 righthanded
Is Gay Activist Michael Rogers Behind The Foley “Outing”?

Blade Caption: Florida Congressman Mark Foley (R) has vowed to vote against the Federal Marriage Amendment, but gay activist John Aravosis said he decided to out the congressman anyway because Foley supports the re-election of President Bush.

Interesting yet speculative.

327 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:50:20pm

#319 Amalie

I think that a big chunk of the reliably "R" vote are people who want anyone but the "D"s. I think the radicalism of the "D" party is the biggest political asset the "R" party has. Probably from 30 to 50% of the people who vote straight party "R" aren't particularly enamored with the "R" platform or candidates, but are petrified of the "D" candidates; even the ones with a moderate veneer.

328 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:51:45pm
329 Murqtaad  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:54:38pm

Chen,

I just posted your 'up' in there because I knew Treez would read it. I'm sure he'll be honored.

As well he should be. He made our day with his fantastic reporting. I'm going out on a limb here and saying both he and I are approx the same age and live within miles of each other, yet we obviously don't drink the same water.

/Philly
//between the age of 25 and 30

330 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:56:45pm

$20 million victory party approved

WASHINGTON - The military's top generals have warned that Iraq is on the cusp of a civil war and that U.S. troops must remain in large numbers until at least next spring. But if the winds suddenly blow a different direction, Congress is ready to celebrate with a $20 million victory party.

Lawmakers added language in this year's defense spending bill, approved last week, allowing them to spend money for a "commemoration of success" in Afghanistan and Iraq that originally was tucked into last year's defense measure but went unspent as increased violence in both countries forced the Pentagon to extend tours of duty for thousands of troops.

Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is the original sponsor of the provision, which Democrats agreed to last year. Senate Republicans kept the authorization in the 2007 bill. With elections five weeks away, Democrats are pointing to it as an example of where the GOP has gone astray in handling the war in Iraq.

McConnell's spokesman, Don Stewart, said he thought the Democrats' finger-pointing was silly because the provision was added last year by unanimous consent.

331 curt9988  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 12:59:39pm

As of this posting, there's nothing about this revelation at the any of the Big 3 news sites. All Hastert, all the time.

332 MandyManners  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:01:13pm

331 curt9988

The media have a really hard time admitting they're wrong.

333 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:02:28pm

Just in to Hot Air. three new pages said he e-mailed them and wanted to have one stay over at his house if he was in town. They contacted ABC news to counter Drudge report of prank. One of them said this is no prank. Sure were quick to answer Drudge weren't they? Mighty suspicious...

334 brickthruplateglasswindow  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:05:44pm
#255 E2M

Has it occurred to anyone that he feels unbelievably stupid and used, and is just trying to run away from the spotlight? Not everyone has the "stand and fight" instinct; some have the "head for the hills" instinct. This isn't as mysterious as a lot of people are making it out to be. The guy is just a coward. Sometimes it's just as simple as that.

You know...I thought this exact same thing initially as well. I mean, if this were Joe Average, I think what you describe would be accurate and airtight.

What got me turned around tough...was that NOBODY and I mean NOBODY that holds any significant polital office is afraid of the spotlight. In fact, virtually every one I'm familiar with CRAVES it. Shrinking violets don't run for political office. I think there's more to this Foley story to develop. Does it matter? At this point, no. If he did something illegal, fry him.

I think Foley folding as quickly as he did reeks more of shame (it's wrong but I'm gonna do it anyway) than embarrassment (ooops, I wasn't thinking and made a 1-time mistake.) Just my 2 ¢

335 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:06:17pm

Sorry I can't link, but it is Hot Air Blog. He wanted oral sex from one. He sure was busy wasn't he. Said it was after he was no longer a page and Foley had continued the messages. Makes one wonder why these boys would continue e-mailing back? Oh they also had another poll saying the Republicans were going to lose big.

336 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:08:57pm

So Barney Frank (Rep. D. MA) can get away this and stay on in the House for years...talk about double standards..yes, Foley was right to resign. But is seems that the dhummies are held to a lesser standard. I have 3 adult sons, a son in law, and a 5-week old grandson, and know that they would never be in this situation. G-d forbid...but why is Frank OK, and Foley, who they also knew was homosexual, a few weeks before the election, being judged guilty before all the evidence is in?

[...]

Gobie's dream has come true. His accusation that Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) knew that Gobie had operated a prostitution service out of Frank's Capitol Hill apartment became national news after it was first reported Friday by the Washington Times.

Frank, one of two openly gay members of Congress, confirmed Friday that he paid Gobie for sex, hired him with personal funds as an aide and wrote letters on congressional stationery on his behalf to Virginia probation officials, but Frank said he fired Gobie when he learned that clients were visiting the apartment.

Frank, a leading House liberal, likened himself to Henry Higgins, who in "Pygmalion" tries to transform a cockney waif into a member of English society. Gobie dismissed that as "garbage." "This is not the case of the poor waif who is being sheltered," Gobie said. "This was the first time he felt good in a relationship. Here's a guy who didn't have a social life until he was 45."

[...]

337 J.D.  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:09:00pm

[Link: hotair.com...]
There it is, nigella.

338 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:09:10pm

327 Earth2moonbat 10/5/2006 02:50PM PDT

#319 Amalie

I think that a big chunk of the reliably "R" vote are people who want anyone but the "D"s. I think the radicalism of the "D" party is the biggest political asset the "R" party has. Probably from 30 to 50% of the people who vote straight party "R" aren't particularly enamored with the "R" platform or candidates, but are petrified of the "D" candidates; even the ones with a moderate veneer.

The last election the country (those who voted) was almost split 50/50. If that many people can vote for a man who betrayed our military to the Viet Cong then spit on the Swiftvets, a man whose entire record after twenty years in the Senate was just 4 bills...

I think we do live in two Americas...

339 lummox  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:09:23pm

#327 Earth2moonbat. Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winner.
The only part I disagree with is the percentages. I guess higher. Much higher.

340 RiverCocytus  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:09:54pm

It's odd. Seems like in Washington, there are no victims; only people who want to look like them.

So Foley wanted out of office, or so some are saying. Seems like an easy way out.

Foley also apparently knows he has a problem. Good for him.

Also, seems like Foley did not want to become a liability to the Party, so he was honorable enough to resign.

But yeah, he is definitely still perverted.

However, those kids are not innocent either. Like I said, no real victims... Good work, page-boy. You might have just destroyed the page program.

341 Mirage  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:10:54pm

I honestly don't see much changing because the whole Foley mess. People aren't going to jump to the democrat side just because one lame congressman was stupid. People aren't going to switch to the republican side (a few might just because of the further exposing of utter hypocracy on the democrat part), but for the most part it's a non-issue and the numbers won't fluctuate all that much.

342 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:10:58pm

#334 brickthruplateglasswindow 10/5/2006 03:05PM PDT


#255 E2M
Has it occurred to anyone that he feels unbelievably stupid and used, and is just trying to run away from the spotlight? Not everyone has the "stand and fight" instinct; some have the "head for the hills" instinct. This isn't as mysterious as a lot of people are making it out to be. The guy is just a coward. Sometimes it's just as simple as that.

You know...I thought this exact same thing initially as well. I mean, if this were Joe Average, I think what you describe would be accurate and airtight.

What got me turned around tough...was that NOBODY and I mean NOBODY that holds any significant polital office is afraid of the spotlight. In fact, virtually every one I'm familiar with CRAVES it. Shrinking violets don't run for political office. I think there's more to this Foley story to develop. Does it matter? At this point, no. If he did something illegal, fry him.

I think Foley folding as quickly as he did reeks more of shame (it's wrong but I'm gonna do it anyway) than embarrassment (ooops, I wasn't thinking and made a 1-time mistake.) Just my 2 ¢


I'm with you. The sociopath crying in court is crying only because he got caught.

343 Roger  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:11:25pm

This goes to show the pages don't need a lot of protection; they're pretty good protecting themselves!

344 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:14:39pm

Thanks JD, I promise to learn to do it someday!

345 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:14:47pm

#335 nigella
Here's your link...

Foleymania! Thursday all-purpose thread; Update: **Three new pages accuse Foley**


ABC claims three new pages have come forward about having been propositioned by Foley. Ugliest detail:
The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley’s home if he “would engage in oral sex” with Foley.


ABC quotes one of the three as saying, “This was no prank.”

It's going to take a while for the dust to settle on this one.

346 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:15:09pm

Roger (#343),

How can you say that?

Those poor innocent and naive pages being prayed upon by a men in power forcing them to do things against their will.

347 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:16:32pm

345 Killgore


Which goes back to this from at the top of the thread:


According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.

I found this to be... incredulous.

348 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:17:38pm

346 Geepers

Those poor innocent and naive pages being prayed upon by a men in power forcing them to do things against their will.

"prayed" upon

lol... lol..

349 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:18:30pm

Earlier someone posted this pimf...

"it would be a forelorn conclusion"

350 froghat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:19:08pm

Why is the page hiring a lawyer now? Is he going to sue?

351 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:21:20pm

Amalie (#348),

Ya liked that did ya? ;-)

"Please. Please."

Who's stalking who here?

352 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:23:28pm

351 Geepers

Geepers!

I was once stalked by a psychiatrist.

353 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:25:12pm

#349 Amalie

This whole sordid tale will end up kind of a forlorn conclusion.

354 MSMediacritic  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:26:01pm

Amalie,

He must have been narapoid. (That's the opposite of paranoid -- you have the strange feeling that you are following someone or that you are out to get someone.)

355 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:26:16pm

#350 froghat

Why is the page hiring a lawyer now? Is he going to sue?

The lawyer he hired is a criminal defense lawyer. The plot thickens.

356 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:27:33pm

On the three new pages these are "verbal" accounts. They are added to the IM they already have. Those IM's we know of are the supposed pranks. ABC sure did come up with quick replacements fot their story and they even quote Drudge. Mighty suspicious.

357 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:27:40pm

#353 Earth2moonbat 10/5/2006 03:25PM PDT

#349 Amalie

This whole sordid tale will end up kind of a forlorn conclusion.

While we get punked by lame ass squirrels.

358 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:27:47pm

#352 Amalie

You should have told him that there are treatments for that now.

/SSRIs will fix anything...

359 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:28:24pm

#354 MSMediacritic 10/5/2006 03:26PM PDT

Amalie,

He must have been narapoid. (That's the opposite of paranoid -- you have the strange feeling that you are following someone or that you are out to get someone.)

Hahahahahahaha!

That is really funny!

360 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:28:45pm

PIMF:for not fot

361 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:29:59pm

358 Earth2moonbat 10/5/2006 03:27PM PDT

#352 Amalie

You should have told him that there are treatments for that now.

/SSRIs will fix anything...

I don't think he would have listened.

362 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:31:07pm

Hey, Charles posted an addendum about Mike Rogers..

363 bill-tb  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:47:43pm

If you ask me, goading Foley was the pages game, for some time it seems. Like any high school, the tricks never die, and the ones that score the highest win.

Gay bashing with a scoreboard. I would bet they had running totals of what they could get out of Foley. That's why so many of them kept IM records, to prove their scores. Sick, but kids are kids.

364 righthanded  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:51:01pm

Worldnet Daily has a story on this about Mike Rogers:

Activist ready to out 'gay' GOP senator
Held info on Foley, has vowed to shake up November election:

[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]

365 hcq  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:54:12pm

The plot for the Foley affair is is starting to sound an awful lot like Hellman's play The Children's Hour (which, BTW, was based on a true story):

To avoid being returned to boarding school, a student acuses her two headmistresses of having a lesbian affair. The accusation is false, but it destroys the women's careers, relationships and lives. The ironic twist: One of the headmistresses is indeed a lesbian, and she's secretly in love with her straight colleague.

366 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 1:57:08pm

#362 Amalie 10/5/2006 03:31PM PDT

Hey, Charles posted an addendum about Mike Rogers

I also noticed Drudge tweaked his story a bit after the other revelation.

367 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:04:23pm

I have only one question and one question only. Could someone explain to me why the left defends homosexual activities of those that share their political agenda but attack those that challenge that same agenda?

368 Proud Kaffir  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:08:01pm

ABC News says they have three more former pages coming forward to hammer some more nails in Foley’s coffin.

It's not Foley's coffin they are working on now. Of course, Hastert is responsible for not previously knowing about allegations that are only coming out now. He needs to personally vet every e-mail and verbal exchange between Congresspeople and everybody else.

Incidentally, Hastert became Speaker in Jan. 99 and one of the new accusers is from the Class of 98. Doesn't matter. It's still Hastert's fault.

Why did no one come forward earlier with the exception of one young man complaining of overly friendly e-mails?

369 observer  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:10:17pm

Sometimes a scumbag is just a scumbag.

370 Muadib  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:12:05pm

Michael Rogers must have rabies.

371 froghat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:15:11pm

I still think there is more to this story than meets the eye. Why did all four of these pages wait until now to make these charges? Why 1 month before an election? From my understanding all of these kids are Republicans and know coming out with this info 1 month before an election will put a stain on their party. Also, why did the page hire a lwayer? I still haven't heard anyone explain why he has to hire a defense lwayer.

372 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:19:49pm

My post @367 was attempt to make the point that the left views the veracity of your POV according to your political leanings. Reality no longer applies. It is a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.

373 Roger  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:19:54pm

#346 Geepers & more.

Good stuff! I come back to some good humor:-) Recognise when I don't reply I've been pulled away for work and other tasks.

I was talking with my folks by phone.

The police & firemen handling the area where the little Amish girls are being buried are doing a fantastic job! They are to be commended. Nobody including the media have a chance of bother the Amish during these painful events. The police blocked off all roads and travel other than by horses and associated vehicles for a 5000 ft radius around the funerals. They buckled it down tight and the whole community of good American neighbors around the Amish are working in concert to give the Amish space from the press and unfriendly types during these sad days. The help & support people are volunteering also brings tears to my eyes mixing with sad and angry tears for the little girls.

374 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:20:28pm

Froghat, I'm not sure all are Republicans.Still it is suspicious. Maybe none of them told each other about these creepy e-mails.Maybe they are gay and didn't want anyone to know. It just seems to me that when that scum from ABC news put out the word for anyone who was contacted by Foley to come forward they did. Some could be doing it for political means or attention. I just don't know.It does seem that he waited untill they were ex-pages before he really got gross.

375 miamiguy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:24:28pm

Foley is a scumbag. Posting conspiracy theories about Democratic operatives doesn't lessen his guilt and just lessens conservative credibility. Some things can be conceded. Every conservative doesn't need to be defended and every Democrat doesn't need to be attacked. Truth, principles and morality are the objective. I am disappointed that this was posted and more disappointed in the headline that it was a prank and he was unwittingly framed.

376 froghat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:27:54pm

Guys, it's time for the Republican party's secret weapon. Release Bin Laden from Bush's secret hiding spot and announce to the world he has been captured. hahah could you imagine the faces of the Democratic party if this happened next week.

377 nigella  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:30:00pm

Miamiguy, No one thinks Foley was framed. Led on by this particular page maybe. The point I am trying to make is that the timing stinks. To hold on to this untill five weeks before the election is "dirty Tricks" that we have seen every election from The Democrats.Their feigned worry for the " children" is pathetique. Maybe if they cared so much for children, more would have voted for Megans Law.

378 Earth2moonbat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:31:56pm

#377 nigella

Not framed. He walked right into it. Set up, yes. But not framed.

379 froghat  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:34:47pm

Maybe Foley wasn't wearing his reading glasses and he thought his page was 65 years old?

380 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:42:44pm

368 Proud Kaffir

Why did no one come forward earlier with the exception of one young man complaining of overly friendly e-mails?

Oh that's easy. Because they did not want to suffer the public humiliation.

But that begs the question: If they did not want to suffer public humiliation then, why come out now when the whole freaking world is watching now?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that these kids are liars or that nothing happened. I'm just skeptical because there is no corroborating physical evidence that I have heard of (am I wrong on this?). If we had a blue dress or more IMs, that would be a start.

Just be advised: Testimony (without physical evidence)in the midst of a sensational media scandal is more often than not, pure, unadulterated crap.

Don't believe me, study the Kennedy Assassination.

381 Geepers  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:47:31pm

miamiguy says:

Truth, principles and morality are the objective.

Followed directly by:

I am disappointed that this was posted

So you're not interested in the truth apparently.

382 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:49:05pm

Since when have the dems held the moral compass of this nation?

/he asks rethorically

383 Excaliber  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:50:44pm

Oh cut the crap and suck it up ...Foley's a pervert and got caught . No , not the only one but a pervert nonetheless , a veritable fucking chicken hawk .

So he's a republican ...so what . This shit goes with the territory for both sides of the aisle . There aint no conspiracy here , it's just buisiness as usual among politicians , they're all whores , none of which desire to work for a living .And they incorporate all manner of stripe .

Yea , it's probably true republicans have swept it under the rug ...the same way democrats would have .

Some of you here remind me of the fucking muslims I debate on blogs for the past several years ..."muslims didn't do 9/11 ' ..."it was someone else" ..."it had to be "...blah blah blah .
There aint no fucking difference ...hooray for our side and to hell with the other .

And while the fucking Democrats and Republicans , engage in their cat fights , inspect each others assholes to a fault , and spend most of their time and my fucking taxdollars trying to rip each others throats out ,and investigating each other ...MY FUCKING COUNTRY GOT BOMBED , due MAINLY to their infighting , lack of co-operation and plain UTTER INCOMPETENCE .
Democrats and Republicans would rather have their "party guy " as CIA or FBI head , even if they're total fucking morons , rather than the BEST man for the job , who just may be affiliated with ..omigosh ...the other party.

Partisanship is going to be our downfall ,and the muslims are laughing at us , if not yet pissing on our heads .

And the bullshit goes on .

We got a do nothing Congress and Senate , and that's because re-election and self-perpetuation , and holding on to a majority has superceeded this country's most dire need s, in a dangerous time .

Republicans are not traitors NEITHER ARE DEMOCRATS and assholes are distributed homogeneouisly amongst both .
So this time around the shit that hit the fan is splattering the Republicans , but dont fucking worry , because while the fucking North Koreans are building their bombs ,I'm sure there will be some asshole democrat that trips over his dick , and then the Republicans can get even .

When are people gonna realize this surreal and ludicrous mess, and shout out to these buffoons :

STOP! YOU'RE KILLING US !

384 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:58:01pm

#366 ChenZhen
the plot thickens...

"This couldn't be a prank," one high-placed insider said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the story. "Everything I've seen indicates that it can't be. Clearly there's been an effort on the part of this gentleman [Drudge] and another blogger...to come back at us."

"[Drudge] doesn't say anything about the fact that there's more than one conversation out there," said another source.


The spin machine is working overtime on both sides. At first I found this to be an uninteresting story, detangling the spin machines has sucked me in.

385 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 2:59:12pm

#383 Excaliber

A most passionate post! I can find nothing to dis-agree with! Right On! If only your post could be the headlines on the news we read in the morning! Not gonna happen, sorry to say. Your post was not lost on this poster if that means anything.

386 stranded conservative  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:02:32pm

Just read the pages of IMs. I need a brain shower.

Look, I'm a teacher of teenagers and I have a 16 year old son. Screw the age of consent. My son is still a child and anyone trying to seduce him would be a pedophile. In the IM's the kid even leaves the room for a minute cause his mom called him. Then he hopes that she didn't see that he was aroused. This is not an adult. I don't care how consenting he may have been.

Side note. The IMs that ABC has are definitely not the first times Foley and the aide had had conversations like this. The aide shows no surprise whatsoever.

Second side note. The aide does not seem to be the one trying to lead Foley on. Foley is the one asking the questions and being the most descriptive. The kid mostly answers "ya" and "lol".

387 Fatal  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:08:14pm

#374 miamiguy

Posting conspiracy theories about Democratic operatives doesn't lessen his guilt and just lessens conservative credibility. Some things can be conceded.

Hey, I think what he did was creepy, but exactly what "guilt" are you talking about? The kind of "guilty" this is NOT to be presumed before proven?

Did you read the actual uncensored IM's? I did, and there is nothing there that isn't pretty common stuff among teens these days. Check out this cite for thousands of examples (some are actually humurous)

Everyone here has "conceded" that what Foley did was stupid at best and that his resignation was appropriate, but political dirty tricks and October surprises are no more the sole province of "conspiracy theories", than are tales of invisible jets that can't be picked up on radar (they are called "stealth" for a reason).

388 Fatal  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:09:08pm

Whoops, that should be # 375, not 374

389 Amalie  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:15:39pm

Man, that's one pissed off sword. Someone better call Merlin..

390 brickthruplateglasswindow  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:17:11pm

#383 Excaliber

Your screen name is appropriate. You've cut to the quick and laid bare the disgusting underbelly of American politics.

391 Proud Kaffir  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:21:35pm

Echoing ABC. . .

Anyone who has any damning evidence, or verbal info about sexual misconduct, or any perversion, on the part of any Democratic candidate, please contact me at the e-mail address. . .

Oh crap, forget it. It would probably just help the Dem candidate get elected.

Wouldn't it be more responsible to ask if anyone has more sleeze on Foley that they contact the investigating authorities? Why are all those people going to ABC?

392 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:21:48pm

#389 Amalie

Man, that's one pissed off sword. Someone better call Merlin..

Methinks we may need Merlin on this one!

393 Outrider  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:23:30pm

#84 Mikel said, "...I'm glad I'm a mar-roon or moron or whatever because I'm upset that Foley was doing what he was doing and the leadership didn't do more to stop it..."

What exactly was the leadership to do? Knowing or suspecting he was gay, they were to..what? Fire him? How? Impeach him?Expose him? For what? Being gay? Don't know if the gays/lesbians would react well to that action. Barney Franks is still around.

Are you suggesting that the party leadership knew and condoned the IM actions? In the face of any of the other scandals, they would cover up this particular action? I have to applaud the timing of these releases. It seems like the Democrats always wait until _just_before the elections for these disclosures to be made public.

The man screwed up. Irrelevant if it was a prank, if he was set up, or if he was out "trolling". And he has resigned. I haven't heard of any criminal actions being performed. Sending the IMs isn't the mark of a prudent individual but it is not illegal. If you wanted to speak of legal action, then the burden of proof would be on the state to prove that he physically typed and transmitted the IMs. Not someone posing as him perhaps. Although, I am not suggesting that this happened. Why aren't Republicans ever entitled to their day in court? Why are they always convicted in the media even before all the facts are revealed?

394 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:33:08pm

#393 Outrider

Oh, I guess you didn't get the memo about those that have a "R" after their name are guilty as charged and those that have a "D" after their name are innocent of all charges because the charges are politically motivated. Sheesh, you need to understand the rules!

/s

BTW: I think that Foley is scum, regardless of how this so-called scandal turns out.

395 gymnast  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:39:10pm

A couple of days ago, I commented that anyone who attempts to polish a turd is going to come away smelling like shit. The Dems, in attempting to dance their dance in celebration of Foley, have stepped in the turd and seem to be intent on licking their shoes clean. It is quite a spectacle. It is one thing to smell like shit and quite another to eat it. The media is doing a pretty good job of helping lick the shit off of the Dem shoes. Disgusting!

396 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:39:23pm
397 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:51:17pm

396 Buzz

Trophy wives and trophy girlfriends half or one-third the age of their husbands or "boyfriends" are a common phenomenon--as are secretaries who become the consort of the boss. Whatever snickering may attend the appearance of such couples, there is little of the kind of "perv" condemnation so very evident in this instance.

Hell, I was watching one of the network morning shows and they were doing a segment on the older woman, younger man phenomenon. It was the most fawning and supportive coverage I've ever seen. They were calling the women of these relationships "Cougars" for Christ's sake.

398 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:55:45pm
399 Excaliber  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 3:59:10pm

Gee Wiz , atleast I'm not the only one , and as you can see from this threads posts , it's just spittin' in the wind .

But I do thank you , for you saved my old lawnmower .It 's been giving me a pain for months now , and was about to grap my 3lb.sledge and get fucking even .
A reprieve however , because before the press is finished playing both sides for chumps , I'm gonna know what color Foley dyes his ball hair , and the lawn mower will face the inevtiable .

400 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:01:50pm
ABC News says they have three more former pages coming forward to hammer some more nails in Foley’s coffin.

Well gee, they must not have been too upset, abused, or traumatized if they're just coming forward today, way after the fact.

/do they each get 15 minutes or do they have to split 15 three ways

401 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:03:35pm

#384 Killgore Trout 10/5/2006 04:58PM PDT

The spin machine is working overtime on both sides. At first I found this to be an uninteresting story, detangling the spin machines has sucked me in.

I feel the same way. There are the dumb and gullible on both sides as well. I try to elevate myself above that stuff and get to what really happened. It's a big part of why I'm on this website.

402 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:08:28pm

398 buzz

I was actually hedging on your question. I did not mean to imply that the women were pervs. I apologize for being unclear.

I'm actually in agreement with you, but after noticing some of the outlandish accusations of pedophilia and other sensationalism, I steered clear of trying to look like I was defending Foley.

Having said that, I think his actions were ill-advised. But from what I know, the things Foley is accused of are really par for the course online. People feel free to play out fantasies they would otherwise not do.

I do think this scandal sends the message: Be very careful what you do online.

403 gymnast  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:08:55pm

#400, They split 15 minutes 3 ways and get to smell like shit for the rest of their lives.

404 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:12:55pm

400 Killian

Please read my post #380. I'd like some criticism of my analysis of these new accusations.

I think I'm spot on accurate, but would like some confirmation. I know the media is not going to ask any questions like I'm asking.

405 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:15:27pm
406 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:17:19pm

Hey, they dropped the kiddie porn charges against John Mark Karr today and he's a free man.

/I wonder if ABC's got him on the plane to DC yet

407 GeeWiz  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:22:42pm

#399 Excaliber

Whew! At least I can sleep well tonight knowing I saved an old lawnmower a most certain demise! LOL!

Nite all!

408 sss111  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:26:25pm

AHA!

Can you say ROVE PLOT?

This clearly has the Machiavellian fingerprint of a Rove master trap.

And the Dems fell for it yet again!

:-)

409 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:27:26pm
#404 bert169

Please read my post #380. I'd like some criticism of my analysis of these new accusations.

I'm not sure what your point is. They came forward to perjure themselves? Because they will be interviewed by the FBI.

/lying to the FBI will get you in a lot of legal trouble

410 TMF  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:38:37pm

Dem Playbook 101:

-Economy humming
-DOW booming
-unemployment dwindling
-US much safer from terrorism


LETS TALK GAY EMAILS!

411 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:53:02pm

409 Killian

I think it will be very difficult to get an indictment, let alone conviction, on a charge of perjury. Without any physical evidence pointing either way, it is a he said-he said battle.

If there story is false (and I'm not saying it is), that in itself is not evidence that they lied. People can unwittingly conflate their own experiences (even when they are immaterial) to the with things they hear in the news.

But again, I'm not suggesting that these kids are lying. I am concerned though that ABC, after failing to authenticate the IMs (which I think they would have found to be a hoax if they did), now trots out 3 witnesses without a hint of physical evidence to back up a claim, and doesn't even acknowledge Drudge's scoop that the first story was a result of a teenage prank game.

Oh I'm sorry, they did have these witnesses say, "This is not a hoax," or something.

Obviously, we should investigate the young peoples' claim, but why no acknowledgement of ABC's screw-up?

412 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:56:07pm

#400 Killian Bundy

Well gee, they must not have been too upset, abused, or traumatized if they're just coming forward today, way after the fact.

It's not so unusual, really, for people who have suffered some kind of sexual abuse to keep quiet about it.

If, for instance, Foley was contacting heterosexual boys, they might have been embarrassed or even ashamed that a man was contacting them for sexual reasons, thinking, perhaps that such contacts suggested that other people would see them as gay. Most heterosexual males--no matter what their age--are not happy about having someone think of them as homosexual.

For women, the threat of going public is that someone will think they provoked an attack or harassment. Some women find that their boyfriends or husbands treat them like damaged goods after a sexual assault.

It's also not uncommon for people to come forward w/ stories of abuse when an abuser is identified by someone else. Because these interactions are generally private, the victim isn't aware that there are others.

I've seen data indicated that, in cases of child sexual abuse, the abusers may have initiated 50-70 incidents of abuse before they are caught.

413 Captain Joe  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:58:00pm

All ABC has is verbal bullshit from the pages. The only "documented evidence" they had was phoney, a practical joke. Now it looks like some of the emails were "edited"
[Link: www.freerepublic.com...]

414 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 4:59:28pm

buzzsawmonkey

5. Trophy wives and trophy girlfriends half or one-third the age of their husbands or "boyfriends" are a common phenomenon--as are secretaries who become the consort of the boss. Whatever snickering may attend the appearance of such couples, there is little of the kind of "perv" condemnation so very evident in this instance.

There is quite a difference between marrying someone--even someone much younger--than making unsolicited advances to someone much younger.

415 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:08:10pm
#412 JustMyView

It's not so unusual, really, for people who have suffered some kind of sexual abuse to keep quiet about it.

Oh, so now receiving raunchy e-mails is sexual abuse. Well, now we really are through the lokking glass.

/give me a [expletive deleted] break

416 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:11:20pm

Just my view 412-

It's not so unusual, really, for people who have suffered some kind of sexual abuse to keep quiet about it.


Foley didn't have them locked in a room somewhere. It's easy to shut off the computer or block IM. Why didn't they?
There's no defense of what Foley did, but this does not qualify as sex or abuse.

417 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:16:58pm
#411 bert169

But again, I'm not suggesting that these kids are lying. I am concerned though that ABC, after failing to authenticate the IMs (which I think they would have found to be a hoax if they did), now trots out 3 witnesses without a hint of physical evidence to back up a claim, and doesn't even acknowledge Drudge's scoop that the first story was a result of a teenage prank game.

They're probably not lying. Foley is a scumbag, he probably sent them e-mail or IMs too. They just didn't think they were important enough to save.

This has never been about Foley.

/It's clearly an "October Surprise", fed to the MSM by democratic operatives, intended to influence the upcoming election and, unless this gets turned around in the next month, it just might work, it has affected the polls in quite a few races

418 CowardKerry  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:20:16pm

The more the comes out the more the Dems smell. Typical. These Mike Moore tactics only bolster the opinions of the Uber left idiots and estrange them from sane democrats. Way to go, Democrats could fuck up a wet dream.

419 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:20:33pm

#415 Killian Bundy
#416 Jim in Virginia

You're both right. I don't think what Foley is accused of, although highly inappropriate, is sexual abuse. My point was that it's reasonably common for people to keep quiet about unwelcome sexual advances, and I don't think it's hard to see why.

As I said, heterosexual men don't typically welcome the attention of other men and may, in fact, feel threatened or ashamed that a gay man has approached them.

For women, things have changed a lot in the past thirty years in that they are not so widely suspected of having brought about the unwelcome sexual advances (or sexual assault), but that dynamic is, to some extent, still with us.

420 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:22:36pm

If the Republican base stays home because of this or whatever, that's just as good as voting for Speaker Pelosi.

/an if the House Bonkeys ever get subpeona power, watch out, it'll get real [expletive deleted] ugly, real [expletive deleted] fast

421 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:24:42pm
422 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:26:14pm
#419 JustMyView

My point was that it's reasonably common for people to keep quiet about unwelcome sexual advances

So, gee, now's a good time to come forward WTF? Why don't they just keep quiet then?

/they must not be that ashamed and embarrassed

423 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:29:48pm

417 Killian

I think what you say about the election is probably true.

But for me, this whole thing was about the way we (Americans)treat people accused of a sexual misconduct of this type: It's always guilty until proven innocent. Evidence be damned.

As for the Democrats, if they were involved (and it looks that way), what they did was sleazy and underhanded. But can they be blamed for understanding Americans' prejudice and emotional reaction to anything resembling sex with kids?

Isn't democracy about having a government that understands and reflects the views held by its citizens?

People do indeed get the government they deserve.

424 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:32:51pm

Just my view 419

heterosexual men don't typically welcome the attention of other men and may, in fact, feel threatened or ashamed that a gay man has approached them.


In person? Sure. Online? If you continue a conversation that turns that direction, I don't think threatened is the right term. Amused, maybe.

425 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:33:27pm

#422 Killian Bundy


So, gee, now's a good time to come forward WTF? Why don't they just keep quiet then?

/they must not be that ashamed and embarrassed

Obviously, I don't know what they were thinking, either with regard to keeping quiet or speaking up. But I have heard of cases in which people who initally kept quiet about this sort of thing spoke up when they learn it wasn't just them that the predator approached. I doubt there are reliable data on that sort of thing, but I know of cases in which it's happened and have heard of others.

And it's sort of reasonable, don't you think? If a person is embarrassed or ashamed about something--even if it's something relatively minor--they might be relieved to know that others had had the same experience or made the same error. I certainly have heard people say some version of, "Gee, I'm glad it's not just me" in relation to such an experience.

426 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:37:51pm
427 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:37:53pm
#425 JustMyView

And it's sort of reasonable, don't you think? If a person is embarrassed or ashamed about something--even if it's something relatively minor

Sure, as a general principle, but it obviously doesn't apply to these three, now does it?

/or they'd still be back in the woodwork and we'd never know they were there

428 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:41:07pm

#421 buzzsawmonkey

And that "quite a difference" would be...?

And please note that I did not refer merely to people who marry their much younger companions.

So tell me: how does Foley's interest in someone much younger make him a "perv," when other people who solicit, and hook up with, much younger companions are not?

Well, first of all, we are not talking about real numbers. You say men who have much younger wives or girlfriends are not commonly regarded as perverts, but we don't really know that. People certainly do make fun of men who get involved in such relationships, and some people might find it kind of skeevy.

You're not wanting to defend Foley, are you? Most posters here have been fairly consistent in condemning him.

429 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:45:58pm

Just my view- was Gary Hart a perv for the Monkey Business with Donna Rice?
How about Wilbur Mills and the Argentine Fircraccker?
I think most saw those as errors in judgment, not perversion.

430 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:46:42pm
#423 bert169

But for me, this whole thing was about the way we (Americans)treat people accused of a sexual misconduct of this type: It's always guilty until proven innocent. Evidence be damned.

Well, good luck with that.

As for the Democrats, if they were involved (and it looks that way), what they did was sleazy and underhanded. But can they be blamed for understanding Americans' prejudice and emotional reaction to anything resembling sex with kids?

Bonkeys are the masters of sleazy and underhanded!

/they "Pearl Harbored" us good and if we don't fight back and turn this arond, election day could turn out to be an utter disaster

431 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:47:36pm

#426 buzzsawmonkey

Unless JMV was a fly on the wall, JMV does not know whether Foley's "advances" (does an instant message count as an "advance?") were "unsolicited" or not.

And, for what it's worth, any "advance" can be "unsolicited," in that somebody always has to make the first move.

You may disagree, but, yes, I think an instant message from a man in his forties or fifties to a 17 or 18-year-old boy is an advance. As to whether these advances were solicted or not, we haven't heard anything to suggest that they were, and we've heard quite a few things to suggest that they were not.

And, yes, at some level any advance is unsolicited, but I'm sure that you know from your own experience that people who have more legitimate interests in each other as potential romantic partners often test each other out through flirting, etc.

432 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:48:59pm
#429 Jim in Virginia

Wilbur Mills and the Argentine Fircraccker

And in the fountain to boot.

/a classic

433 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:50:43pm

#429 Jim in Virginia

Just my view- was Gary Hart a perv for the Monkey Business with Donna Rice?
How about Wilbur Mills and the Argentine Fircraccker?
I think most saw those as errors in judgment, not perversion.

I think you are right, and one reason for the difference is that both Donna Rice and Fannie Fox (that was her name, right?) were adults.

Certainly every adult married male who has an affair is not a pervert---a jerk, maybe, but not a pervert.

434 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:55:59pm

Just my view 433- the age cf consent in DC is 16. At least one of the kids Foley IM'd was 18 at the time. At what age does older/ younger become perversion?

435 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:58:42pm
436 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 5:58:50pm

#427 Killian Bundy

Sure, as a general principle, but it obviously doesn't apply to these three, now does it?

/or they'd still be back in the woodwork and we'd never know they were there

You may have missed part of my argument, which was that when people learn about someone else who has experienced the same negative thing that they've experienced, they feel less ashamed or embarrassed because they are less likely to see the experience as something unique to them. That is, other people have had similarly embarrassing experiences or similar experiences that have made them feel ashamed.

And, because their embarrassment or shame is lessened, they are more willing to talk about it. Opening up in the way that these three young men are doing now is perhaps especially likely if they were embarrassed or angry about the experience. They might not have wanted to admit it at the time, but now that they know they are not alone in having had Foley put the moves on them, they are more willing to talk about it.

437 Excaliber  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:02:35pm

For all those who are 'agonizing " over whether this thing is just ...well ...you know , the way the world works , consider this :

How would you feel if Foley was :

Your father ?

Your son ? Uncle ?

The local toy store owner ?
School Teacher ? Principle ?

Sports coach ? Tai kon Do teacher ?

How long would YOU wait to deal with the issue ?

Foley's got far more power and influence than any of the aforementioned .

Now tear off that big blue [or is it red /]
" R " from his back , or that big red "D "

[red and blue ,aint that like the Cripps and Bloods ? ]
Well what you now have is a big BLACK M/c...morally corrupt .

Foley is a single man , and he can go chase sheep for all I care . He can have sex with men , women or inanimate objects if he choose , but these are kids .Whatever they are now or 2 , 3 years after the fact , no matter what motive any one whishes to impune on them , they were underage , and did not initiate the contacts ...now where does that leave Foley ?
Where does that leave ANYONE who knew and failed to act ?
And you can say the same about anyone who in a position of power , [or not ]and engages in such behavior .And if politics are to take the stage [and precedent ] , then that only compounds the offense .
And children in that position of Page , defer naturally to a degree . Some of them think it a joke , another "just the way things are " ,like I've heard exprssed by some . And some are intimidated or shocked , at least to a point of keeping quiet , sensing that there would not be support .

This really shoud be an easy one for everybody .

And guess what ? We just so happen to be dealing with an enemy who would slit our throats and that of our children . And we will now be obsessing on IM's , and heavy duty fingerpointing .
And all the "journalists " will be feverishly pursueing the juicy tidbits , that lay rotting in the corners , to keep the level of "interest " up .

But deal with it and "move on " we got bigger fish to fry ...we got "the elections comin' up " , so lets fling the shit all over the place and make sure we get it mopped up and deoderized before "election day " ...

Remember ? , while we were looking for Big Bill's cigar , and trying to quantify the amount of semen deposited on Monica's dress , our enemies were plotting ... Monica gets a flunky tv spot and we get 9/11 .

Does anyone think the bad guys are on vacation ?

438 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:05:43pm
439 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:06:07pm

Just my View 436- tell me , please. If these boys were threatened or embarassed by Foley's IM, why did they continue the discussion? Why not give it the same attention you give to spam for penis or breast enlargement?
Power is an aphrodisiac. A Congressman (or an NBA star) believes he can get away with anything. Thatpwer is very attractive. My hunch- the kids stayed online with Foley because they knew who he was. They weren't threatened, they were fascinated, or amused.

440 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:06:36pm

#434 Jim in Virginia

Just my view 433- the age cf consent in DC is 16. At least one of the kids Foley IM'd was 18 at the time. At what age does older/ younger become perversion?

Of course, there's no rule, but someone I know actually has a formula. For him to be interested in a woman, she has to be at least five years older than his daughter. So, if his daughter is 25, then he shouldn't be interested in anyone younger than 30. He viewed this as a lower bound and said that, as a 50-year-old man, he probably would not want to be involved w/ someone who was not at least in her mid-30s.

In my own view, I think once people get to be 25 or so, they are adults and have enough experience to tell people to buzz off if they're not interested.

I don't see the age of consent as the issue; it's really about the maturity of the younger person. And I'd say that a boy still in high school---and still living with his parents and doing homework---is not mature enough to be the object of sexual interest of a substantially older man.

441 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:10:32pm

Just my view 440

I think once people get to be 25 or so, they are adults


Monica was what, 22? So does that make Bill Clinton a perv?

442 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:14:29pm
443 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:17:02pm

#435 Buzzsawmonkey

One of the great things about LGF is its tolerance for those who, unlike yourself, are unwilling to blindly follow the herd instinct.

I am "defending" nothing. I am asking, yet again, why Foley should be roundly decried as a "perv" for mere Internet contact, with persons apparently within the legal age of consent, when people who engage in actual physical sexual relationships with others of widely disparate age are not.

And neither you nor anyone else has yet offered anything approaching an answer.

Waiting.

There's no reason to be insulting. You can call my perspective "herd following" if you like, but I don't think I'm really too unusual in this respect. There are such things as social conventions and, generally, those conventions arise for a social purpose--to protect people who are vulnerable, for instance.

For me, it's not about homosexuality. I would think it was a little creepy if a man of Foley's age were emailing girls who had just left the page program as well.

As to the kind of couples you describe, I would say that any relationship that people are willing to make public differs from relationships that are furtive or hidden. Most relationships begin in public and develop over time--partly in public and partly in private. Foley would never have been able to go public about a relationship w/ one of these pages---and not because it would have been a homosexual relationship. It's because it would have been seen as an inappropriate, exploitative relationship.

444 bert169  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:20:54pm

435 Buzzsawmonkey

What I find particularly troubling about the charge of pervert and child molester is the leap of logic it takes to make it and how willing people are to make that leap.

They are assuming that a man (or woman), under what they believe is a shield of anonymity (an internet chat site) who engages in a fantasy about participating in a taboo form of sex would inevitably pursue the same taboo in real life.

Now, some certainly do. But do we really believe these kids (17 and 18 year olds)never heard the type of stuff Foley was saying?

Again, let me make clear. If he has committed a crime, he should be charged. But I don't consider saying sexually explicit things to teenagers (whether or not the individual saying them is in the process of breaking his Ramadan fast)rises to level of molestation. Pervert, maybe. But I'm not convinced.

445 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:21:23pm
JMV: I think once people get to be 25 or so, they are adults

Jim in VA: Monica was what, 22? So does that make Bill Clinton a perv?

I didn't call Foley a pervert. That was someone else's terminology, and I don't think I would use it. I've been referring to Foley's actions as inappropriate, and I think that's a better term.

And that's what I'd say about Clinton and Monica too. Their relationship, such as it was, was inappropriate in several ways--because he was married, because she was much younger, because she was his employee.

446 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:21:35pm
447 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:26:44pm

Gerry Studds and others 15 years ago.
Foley today.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, the page program has got to go...
It's late, nite all, thanks for the fun.

448 Tasty Beverage  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:27:35pm

I can't wait for La Page aux Foley to be over.

Like Charles says, stupidest scandal of the year.

449 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:27:40pm

Just for the record.

This will have no effect on the way I vote.

I really don’t give a damn.

I see this as just more of the same old shit from the left.

The sooner they ESAD the better.

450 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:39:30pm

#446 buzzsawmonkey

Two words: Gerry Studds.

Merely censured for an actual, physical sexual relationship with a page--not a few crappy emails. Kept his House seat, and was re-elected several times.

Your statement has no foundation in fact or history.


I know you think the difference is that Studds was a Democrat and Foley is a Republican, but I don't think that has anything to do with it.

I don't know all the details, but I understand that the page Studds had sex with said at the time that it was consensual, which, again, doesn't make it right. But I think the main difference is that our standards have changed. We have different standards about sexual behavior--in some ways looser but, with regard to children, they are tighter. I also think the issue of consent has come to the fore to a much greater extent than was the case 20 or so years ago. For both of those reasons, people might see things differently now.

Neither of us knows, of course, what kind of pressure Foley was under to resign, but, unless the House leadership is lying about what they knew and when they knew it, the pressure couldn't have been that great. Foley resigned pretty much as soon as the IMs were made public. He seems to have recognized that, once the details of his behavior were known, he'd be forced out, and he spared himself, his party, and the kids he'd interacted with the trouble.

I should perhaps also say that, although I've described his behavior as inappropriate and I hold to that view, I actually feel sorry for the guy. Perhaps if he had been willing to come out of the closet, he might have been more at ease in life and might not have gotten involved in some of the things he did get involved in. He seems to have been a well-liked and capable member of the house and also someone who served his district well.

And, by the way, I agree that it's absurd to think of boys in their mid to late teens as children, but they are not really adults either. They are physically mature, but they are not intellectually or emotionally mature. That's why parents worry about their kids becoming sexually active. They know that the kids have surging hormones and that they experience sexual desire, but they also know that they are people who still have to be told to pick up their socks and to get their homework done on time.

451 takanhorse  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 6:52:18pm

#440 Just My View

As far as 25 being the magic age of maturity, I think that depends on your life. My husband joined the Army at 17 (left for boot camp the day after he graduated from High School). We got married at the ridiculous age of 18 (I was 19). His magic maturity date was 18.5 when I told him he was going to be a daddy. At 25, he had been married 7 years and had his 2nd baby on the way. In the mean time, he put me through college for my undergrad and MBA on his enlisted pay. Fast forward to now, we have been married 16 years, have 2 well adjusted children and can actually save some money! His 5 years in the Army to get us started turned into 17 and going. I don't pretend that we are the "norm"; we have beaten some pretty stiff odds. My long winded point is maturity comes from experience, not age. They usually go hand in hand, but not always.

452 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 7:04:50pm

#451 takanhorse

Congratulations on your good marriage and your family. You have, indeed, beaten some stiff odds. I just did a quick check of some statistics on divorce rates based on age of marriage, and the figures are pretty striking.

For women married by age 20, almost half of those marriages will end in divorce. Of those first married between ages 20 and 24, about 1/3 will end in divorce. Of those first married between ages 25 and 29, about a quarter will end in divorce. Of those who first marry over age 30, about 15% (roughly 1 in 6 or 7) end in divorce.


So, compared to other people who made the same choice, you've done pretty darn well.

453 JustMyView  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 7:05:28pm

Gotta go, folks. Good night.

454 Nancy  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 7:57:50pm

I apologize if this was posted above --

I am presuming this may be one of the 3 "new" pages who do not want to be identified.

It is a statement from the family of one that was 16.

[Link: www.cnn.com...]

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a left-leaning watchdog group, posted some of the e-mails he exchanged with the former male page in 2005, who was then 16

The family's statement calls the e-mails "ambiguous"

Saying the family wishes to remain anonymous, the statement adds that the former page is "becoming a victim due to harassment by some of the media."

Although our son bravely came forward with information regarding Congressman Foley, his experience as a House page was not marred by the kind of wrongdoing that appears to have occurred with respect to other House pages and Congressman Foley.

455 ChenZhen  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 9:30:51pm

#454 Nancy 10/5/2006 09:57PM PDT

I am presuming this may be one of the 3 "new" pages who do not want to be identified.

No, this is the original page:

These instant messages, which have only recently surfaced as a result of the news of the ambiguous e-mails received by our son, are separate matters.

So to recap, we have this guy with the emails, the guy(s) with the IM's (Drudge story), the page involved in the vote IM session (assuming they are different), and 3 new pages. There are probably many more.

456 BlackRedneck  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 9:47:10pm

I'm bored with the story at this point. I switched radio stations every time the subject came up. I bet others are too. I never heard of Foley before this story. He's a perv but he's gone. I'm done.

The only election this should affect is in Foley's district, and his replacement seems to be doing okay. That must suck for the Dem candidate. Losing to the perv. The only thing worse is losing to the dead guy.

I'm amused at Foley's kitchen sink approach to defense-- "I'm a gay drunk who was molested by a Catholic priest." Puh-leese...

I also like the fact that the Dems are arguing that Foley's a gay man so people should have known he's a perv. So, I guess the ACLU will be withdrawing all of their Boy Scouts' litigation now.

457 BlackRedneck  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:31:44pm

Buzzsawmonkey #421

So tell me: how does Foley's interest in someone much younger make him a "perv," when other people who solicit, and hook up with, much younger companions are not

Pedophilia refers to adults who want to have sex with prepubescent children. So if a 50 year-old man wants to have sex with a 16 year-old Lindsey Lohan, pedophilia is not the issue. Icky maybe, pedophile no.

The problem is that the Dems are deliberately equating pedophilia with homosexuality. They are also equating pervert with homosexuality. Now, I find this amusing because the Dems are throwing gay people under the bus. Bob Becknel has argued that the Republicans should have immediately known that Foley was up to no good. "It's like putting a bank robber in charge of the bank."

While Foley is not a pedophile, I do think he's a perv and creepy. A perv like the social misfit who spends $50k on phone sex and thinks Operator #6 is really his girlfriend.

So, I find the arguments about whether the page was 16 or 18 irrelevant. The main issue is that Foley was in a position of power and he used it to try and seduce teenagers he worked with. Again, it's amusing to watch people who defended Clinton on the grounds that Monica was just about sex go ballistic over IM's that didn't involve, ya know, actual sex.

458 EIDE_Interface  Thu, Oct 5, 2006 10:59:12pm

What's amazing is that swing voters will allow this to so sway them that the Dems will pick up 50 seats. Disaster for America 2007-2009.

459 Stuck-in-CA  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 12:09:33am

Foley, Foley, Foley...

[Link: f-o-l.blogspot.com...]

460 Excaliber  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 2:35:48am

Hey , does anyone remember when this type of thing would be considered to be extremely bad JUDGEMENT , now matter what political stripe ?
And no one would want their sons or daughters around people like this ?
Whether or not those kids are to be considered vulnerable or not does not make a difference .


REGARDLESS OF THE CHILDRENS REACTIONS ?

Amused ...sophisticated ...what the hell is the difference ?

And now some are saying this is "gay bashing " ...they are assholes . And I dont care what quarter its coming from .

The political argument has taken precedence over the moral argument .

Nobody get's it eh ?

If it were a democrat , republicans would be doing exactly the same thing , and charges about the press would be exactly the same .

I'm waiting now for the anthropological argument ...hey " the caesars had their youngf boys , and look how successfull their careers were ".

I'm all for "moving on " too, but not before we get it right, and that is quick and uneqivical condemnation of Foley, and any and all who covered it up or failed to act due to their own moral cowardice , no matter the excuse .

And like I said , for all those political animals that will seek revenge or "evening out te score ", have no fear , the way we are inspectiung each others assholes ,there will no doubt , sooner before later , be a democrat getting caught up in another scandal .

Maybe some forget the wisdom of the ages , [that we all know to be true ] like " a house divided will fall " [particularly relevant in these times ] or will we all wait till 'the handwriting appears on the wall " ?

461 pietter3  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 4:16:39am

This is by far the best summation of the Foley incident I have read!

From: The American Thinker,"Worst October Surprise, EVER" by Patrick Godfrey
Oct 5, 2006


[Link: www.americanthinker.com...]

462 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 7:35:50am

#26 Occasional Reader
Unheard of! Absurd!

463 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 8:50:29am
464 Excaliber  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 9:37:34am

Hey buzzsawmonkey [appropriate name btw ] , if yopu can't figure out what is wrong with Foley's behavior , if you have trouble delineating the act or the intention , then you are as morally bankrupt as Foley .
Your argument is ridiculous , as well as your "challenge " .

But ...a no brainer to some , is mental anguish to others ...go take an aspirin .
Your argument is not thatall different than the muslims who attack and then blame the victim .
In either case , it takes ignorance .


So , if the shoe fits ...

465 miamiguy  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 9:50:12am

Geepers says:

miamiguy says:

Truth, principles and morality are the objective.

Followed directly by:

I am disappointed that this was posted

So you're not interested in the truth apparently.


You are playing pretty fast and loose and unless you support gay kiddie pedophilia you are being disingenous. I think the headline: "Foley IMs Were a Prank" based on two unnamed inside sources who know one of the former congressional pages without verification or reference to the other pages who received emails is silly. The truth is Foley propositioned young boys. No further discussion or obfuscation is appropriate or needed. There is no need to defend the indefensible and concession that Foley is a scumbag - end of story - on this one is the better moral course of action which also happens to coincide with the better political course of action.

466 Geepers  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 9:56:20am

miamiguy (#465),

You are playing pretty fast and loose and unless you support gay kiddie pedophilia you are being disingenous.

LOL.

Nice "argument".

And if you respond to this post you get off on fat guys wearing sequined tutus.

467 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 10:09:44am
468 miamiguy  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 11:48:22am
Geepers said:

LOL.

Nice "argument".

And if you respond to this post you get off on fat guys wearing sequined tutus.


What color tutu?

I get it. You can't refute the rest of the post so attack the one line you can attack.

469 Excaliber  Fri, Oct 6, 2006 2:51:33pm

buzzsawmonkey , you're trying to make your argument plausible ...to what , I have no idea .
YEA ...he's a perv , not because [he now says] he's gay , but because he was more than suggestive , and even if he was just slightly suggestive , the action of e-mail to the Pages for anything less than buisiness ,relevant to Foley and/or the Pages ... nails it .

Not remarks on the sly , or body language or inflections ...an intentional action .

Who the hell do you know ?, that if their kid was a page , would take lightly to a Congressman asking their son what his penis size is , or remarking about aspects of that sons body , or all the other "suggestive " YEA SUGGESTIVE --"banter " as one said ?
If he didn't do a bloody thing he was atleast fawning on them ...a grown man , someone elses children ! , entrusted to honorable men .

Now if you can't see it that way [the way it really is ] then I can come to only one of two conclusions :

1 ) you're a totally fucking blind and anal republican , who would rather defend a dirtbag , minimize his behavior , make light of the moral gravity of the situation ...for the sake of phony partisan politics [at their worst ].

2) you're just like Foley , you've lost your moral compass .

470 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Oct 9, 2006 10:48:17am

This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Sunbathing in the van allen belt.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

Read More, Spend Less. New Lower Prices on Thousands of Books!

 Frank says:

Well, you know people, I'd rather have my own game show than have enough votes to become president.