LGF

more options

  

Advertisement
Discover the World's largest E-Book Store! Save big on bestsellers!

Gulf States Agree to IAF Overflights?

Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 9:46:16 am PST

The Telegraph has a report today that Israel has been seeking an “all clear” from the United States for a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities: Israel seeks all clear for Iran air strike.

But an even more interesting report at Haaretz from a Kuwaiti newspaper says that Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates have agreed to let their air space be used by the IAF too: Report: 3 Gulf states agree to IAF overflights en route to Iran.

Three Arab states in the Persian Gulf would be willing to allow the Israel Air force to enter their airspace in order to reach Iran in case of an attack on its nuclear facilities, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Siyasa reported on Sunday.

According to the report, a diplomat from one of the gulf states visiting Washington on Saturday said the three states, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates, have told the United States that they would not object to Israel using their airspace, despite their fear of an Iranian response.

Al-Siyasa further reported that NATO leaders are urging Turkey to open its airspace for an Attack on Iran as well and to also open its airports and borders in case of a ground attack.

According to a British diplomat who spoke to an Al-Siyasa correspondent, Turkey will not repeat the mistake it made in 2003, when it refused to open its airspace to U.S. Air Force overflights en route to attacking Iraq.

Advertisement

95 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:47:21am

48 hours......

/They really need to overfly Saudi airspace.

2 Killgore Trout  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:48:08am

Hooray for the peanuts!

3 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:48:13am
NATO leaders are urging Turkey to open its airspace for an Attack on Iran

I smell fish.

4 flipflop  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:48:14am

Hmmm...there's still Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

5 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:50:39am

#4 flipflop

Israel doesn't need Jordan; they can fly over Eliat, and over the Red Sea, but they do need Saudi. That's why this smells very fishy.

6 Killgore Trout Stinks  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:50:48am

#3 Earth2moonbat

I smell fish.


Sorry about that.

7 slaphappy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:51:29am

Actually, I would think the gulf states have no choice in the matter. politically speaking of course.

8 mbruce  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:52:40am

PR move: say that the pilots are ex-ACLU pedarists and the MSM will ignore the attack.

9 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:54:00am

OT,

Ace spills secret plan of unnamed fairly big blogger to create Digg competitor.

10 ec marm  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:54:05am

Hey, they can fly over my backyard if it sets the Iran program back to year one. Problem in Iran still dates back to Jhimmi Carter. Mad mullahs and government are a bad mix.

11 lawhawk  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:54:24am

Anyone look at a map? Israel would fly a route that is thousands of miles longer just to get to Iran by supposedly securing those overflights.

It is quite curious, however, to see that the Arab countries will turn to Israel to solve their problems when necessary - Iran is the far bigger threat to their survival than Israel ever was. Israel is just the bogeyman that all turn to in order to avoid dealing with the harsh realities of their own failed regimes.

12 Spiritualized  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:54:25am

It's not civil war it's just a "feud." Nothing surprises me when it comes to the MSM covering for these bloodthirsty murderers any more.

5 Palestinians Die in Gaza Feud

Five Palestinians were killed and more than 40 wounded in fighting between clans on Friday and early Saturday in Khan Yunis

13 JammieWearingFool  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:55:20am

John Murtha Grandpa Simpson objects, predicts quagmire.

14 slaphappy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:56:17am

Not to re route a thread or anything. But, could any one tell me how this whole digg thing works. With votes, buries, spydigg etc?...Im ahhh...Trying to explain to my ten year, and hes not understanding.. Ya thats it!

Cheers..

15 nyc redneck  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:56:25am

ok...let's git her done.

16 EE  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:56:26am

Syrian-born historian worries that Iran would annihilate Sunnis
[Link: memri.org...]

17 MandyManners  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:57:28am

Those nations agreeing to it are not fools.

18 JammieWearingFool  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:58:00am

Spiritualized,

It's a family feud, Pali style.

19 sonofsheldon  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:19am

#11
lawhawk
And if Israel does solve the Iranian problem, they will be roundly condemned in public by these and other schmucks, who privately will be collapsing in relief. It's the old win-win situation for these Arab-Muslim countries that are too craven to face up to the bully

20 strandedsf  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:25am

If only the MSM could be right this once.

Go IAF!

21 squarepeg  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:42am

#11 lawhawk

It is quite curious, however, to see that the Arab countries will turn to Israel to solve their problems when necessary

And to America, the other of the twin satans.

I'm glad overflights can't be hidden from the public eye. I'm sick of all the double-facedness these Arab regimes demand when they participate with us. A show of anti-Americanism for the home crowd while they secretly reap the benefit of an American alliance. I wish we'd start making our support contingent on transparency.

22 JammieWearingFool  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:43am

Jules Crittenden has Kharnival of the Iranities.

23 Killgore Trout  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:47am

#9 Dar ul Harb
That's an interesting idea.

24 ROP?LOL  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:49am

It is quite curious, however, to see that the world Arab countries will turn to Israel to solve their problems when necessary -

25 evil zionist  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:59:54am

Haha, Owned.
Qatar, Oman, And UAE - Rock on!

26 NoSubmission  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:01:09am

Could this be a flying pig moment?

/All puns intended.

27 looking closely  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:02:08am

Let the saber-rattling commence

28 TimeQuake  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:03:15am

It's a start.

29 lawhawk  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:06:03am

Jammie:

Yeah, let's play the feud! /richard dawson.

Funny, but isn't it curious how the two groups of the clan were divided between Fatah and Hamas. They were simply discussing dining arrangements and Mahmoud didn't want to sit next to Abdul and Mahmoud took the seating way too seriously. Yeah, that's the ticket.

30 Dianna  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:06:16am

It just means that the Gulf States regard nuts with nukes as bad for business. Very interesting, though, that this is getting picked up this fast.

31 shug  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:06:55am

dinner jacket to soil his PJ's

stay tuned

32 BulgarWheat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:07:03am

resurrecting my tee-shirt from 1979....


"Nuke Iran!"

wow, this tee-shirt sure did shrink. never stick cotten in the drier!

33 lioness  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:07:27am

Cheney Arrives in Persian Gulf for Talks

[Link: abcnews.go.com...]

Maybe something is brewing....

34 experiencedtraveller  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:08:24am

It just shows how terrified the Arabs are of Persian hegemony that they would support the JOOOOOOS.

Fascinating, really.

35 Mike C.  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:09:01am

Since all 3 of these countries supported the US in the ongoing Iraq situation, I don't find this startling news.

36 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:09:04am

OT,

Digg counterattack seems to be working, at least against "truthers."

37 Highrise  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:09:34am

9 Dar ul Harb 2/25/2007 09:54AM PST

OT,

Ace spills secret plan of unnamed fairly big blogger to create Digg competitor.

Competition is a wonderful thing hehe /big grin.

38 EE  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:10:48am

re #16

February 16, 2007

London-Based Syrian-Born Historian Mahmoud Al-Sayyed Al-Dugheim on Al-Jazeera: Iran Established Global Shiite Government, Operating in Accordance with the Protocols of the Mullahs of Qom, to Annihilate the Sunnis

The following are excerpts from an interview with Syrian-born historian Mahmoud Al-Sayyed Al-Dugheim, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 30, 2007.

Mahmoud Al-Sayyed Al-Dugheim: "We consider the Zionist plan to be dangerous to the Arab nation, but even more dangerous is the Safavid Sassanian Iranian plan to restore the Empire of Cyrus, which would range from Greece to Egypt, and the Arabian Peninsula, in addition to other regions. The Zionist plan was unable to penetrate the ranks of Islamic unity, the way the Safavid Iranian plan did. The collaborators with the Zionists throughout the Arab and Islamic world are too ashamed to reveal themselves, while the collaborators with the Sassanian Safavid plan boast about it in public. Wasn't it one of their leaders who said yesterday: 'We are a Lebanon in Iran, and an Iran in Lebanon?'"

[...]

"While the Zionist plan targets Jerusalem, which is holy to us, the Safavid plan targets Mecca and Al-Madina. If you go back to their books - which they do not mention in the media, yet these books exist and are accepted by them - they claim that their Hidden Imam will come to Mecca and Al-Madina, destroy the Al-Haram Mosque and the Mosque of the Prophet, and dig in the graves of Abu Bakr and Omar and burn them both, and then he will command the wind to blow them away. He will also dig in the grave of Aisha, the Mother of the Believers, and will execute her. All this is part of their plan."

[...]

"The Shah was most definitely one of the sworn enemies of the Arabs, but he did not legislate a law to persecute the Sunni Muslims, who constitute one-third of the Iranian population. The new Iranian constitution persecutes Sunni Muslims in Iran, while it gives constitutional rights to the Zoroastrians, the Jews, and the Christians. This constitution denies the Sunnis these rights. There is no Sunni mosque in Tehran, even though there are over two million Sunni Muslims there."


I think that the problem with Iran as a nuclear power has two worries for the Arab Sunni world: Iran is Persian-ruled, not Arab; and Iran is Shiite-ruled, not Sunni.
Also, Ahmadinejad has an ayatollah mentor that is close to the Hojatieh school. Reportedly the Hojatiehs are Shiite supremacists according to some reporting on the Web. This may worry some Sunnis.

39 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:11:52am

I'm not sure there isn't some hope for Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. We have a big customer in Dubai, and so far my dealings with people there have been surprisingly warm and without any hint of latent of jihadism.

To tell you the truth, I'm far more afraid of the Muslims in Liverpool, Detroit or Mississauga, Ontario than I am of the Muslims in Dubai. The UAE has always been fairly chilled out, relative others in the region that is.

40 Roger  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:11:55am

#31 shug

dinner jacket gets his chaos. The question is, will it be enough to satisfy/awake the Mahdi-in-a-Well.

41 NoSubmission  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:14:06am

39 Pro-Bush Canuck

I'm not sure there isn't some hope for Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates.


Don't get too excited. They all [including Qatar, home of CENTCOM]still print anti-Semitic/anti-Israel cartoon propaganda in their govt.-owned press and buy off their terrorists.
Strange bedfellows indeed.

42 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:16:09am

#41 NoSubmission

Yeah, I know. That's why I specifically said "some hope". "Faint hope" may have been better.

It is nonetheless true that they (the people) are far less aggressive overall than than say, Pakistanis or Egyptians.

43 RoyalCanadian  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:17:52am

As it turns out Jimmi Carter was the first female president. No offense to (right-wing) women intended. I'm just sayin’ that if a person has no balls...

In November of 1979 Jimmi caved like a cheap tent and thereby emboldened the Iranians and other muslim lunatics and got them all started on the path they currently tread.

Jimmi Carter’s legacy, much to his chagrin, is the gift that keeps on give in.

And when tiny Israel ultimately flies through the air space of their temporary “marriage of convenience” mussie buddies to clean up another of Jimmi’s geopolitical messes, Jimmi will fly off the small remaining handle upon which he perches like the shriveled old self-promoting vulture that he has become.

If Jimmi had a mussie name it would be watan azol.

44 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:17:54am

OT,

From the comments to that entry, a useful tool that gives you the "most buried" stories. If you set it up to show only "Politics" "World News" "Business And Finance", you'll see these LGF stories on its "anti-front" page:

ACLU: US Can't Bar Terrorism Supporters
ACLU Chapter President Arrested for Child Porn
Iranian Fauxtography Update: Winchester Replies
The Worst AP Article Yet
Muslim Council of Britain's Shari'a Plan
Islamic Grievance Theater Update (Video)
Help Prevent Shari'a at Twin Cities Airport
Video: Taliban Recruits Hundreds of Suicide Bombers to Attack NATO

8 of 15 are from LGF. Feel the love.

45 bob tail  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:19:23am

Let's hope and have the fingers crossed that Israel's not going to its second fiasco after its shameful defeat to the Mullahs in Libanon last Summer

46 NoSubmission  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:19:48am

42 Pro-Bush Canuck

It is nonetheless true that they (the people) are far less aggressive overall than than say, Pakistanis or Egyptians.


Anything to give Dinnerjacket something to seethe about is fine by me!
:)

47 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:22:53am

#14 slaphappy

Not to re route a thread or anything. But, could any one tell me how this whole digg thing works. With votes, buries, spydigg etc?...Im ahhh...Trying to explain to my ten year, and hes not understanding..

I hereby request a thread on the subject. I can find my way around, and I understand the issues, but there are some details that aren't clear to me. A tutorial from the Grand Lizard would be most welcome (including such things as knowing when a thread is buried, tor example).

48 amphibian  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:24:12am

The Osirak raid was conducted without so many public announcements, so far in advance. Do you lizardoids suppose that this is only saber-rattling, or is Israel so confident in its ability to dodge the Russian SAMs that it feels free to announce its intentions?

Third possibility: could this be a move to flush sensitive equipment out where it can be seen, to make it easier to pick targets for a more stealthy strike later?

49 Killian Bundy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:26:47am
#45 bob tail

Let's hope and have the fingers crossed that Israel's not going to its second fiasco after its shameful defeat to the Mullahs in Libanon last Summer

Um, just how do you figure that Israel was defeated?

/last time I checked, Hezbollah got it's ass kicked and most of the infrastructure in the parts of Lebanon they control still lies in ruin

50 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:27:45am

#35 Mike C.

Since all 3 of these countries supported the US in the ongoing Iraq situation, I don't find this startling news.

Dealing above the table with the Great Satan is one thing, dealing above the table with the Little Satan is another thing. Much more politically risky.

When it comes right down to it, say what you will about the Saudis, but while they were terrorist supporting antisemites forever, they were staunch US allies all throughout the cold war. They were never ashamed to be seen in public with the US. Not so with Israel.

51 squarepeg  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:27:53am

#38 EE

I think that the problem with Iran as a nuclear power has two worries for the Arab Sunni world: Iran is Persian-ruled, not Arab; and Iran is Shiite-ruled, not Sunni.

EE, the difference is much more than ideological or cultural by now; it's a deep, visceral hatred. Talk to an Iranian person sometime -- preferably a Zoroastrian. The Iranians have an historical hatred for the Arabs that's similar to what the Chinese feel for Japan (sweeping generalizations, I know). There's a prevailing notion among Iranians that the stupid barbarian pig Arabs destroyed the great Persian civilization hundreds of years ago when they swept in and did their forcible conversions. It's an eternal affront and an unbridgeable difference between nations and individuals on both sides.

52 Highrise  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:28:09am

OT

14 slaphappy 2/25/2007 09:56AM PST

But, could any one tell me how this whole digg thing works. With votes, buries, spydigg etc?

Their FAQ is sorta lame.
[Link: www.digg.com...]

*have to make an account

*if an online story has a digg button, you press it. If not, you can go to digg and submit it.

*then make sure you press the digg button that is to the left of the story headline. If you think the story is inaccurate, etc..you can *bury* it. We think it takes 1 bury per 10 digs to bury it from the viewable articles. I think Charles or someone said that if someone burys it with a causation (you have several reasons to choose from) of inaccurate, it can never come back up. Digg doesn't disclose their algorithms.

*You can also mark it as your my#1 if it's important to you. Someone mentioned that it helps it become harder to bury.

*you can go into the comments section and digg or bury comments you agree/disagree with..and make comments yourself.

*You can add friends to watch what they are digging/burying. You can add friends by clicking on their profile (their little picture by their name where they are posting at) and right under their picture it says ADD Friend.

The rest you will have to play with or keep your eyes tuned here as people talk..that is all I know after a day's worth of messing around.

I had a hay day yesterday..it was like playing slots at a casino :P .

53 squarepeg  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:30:19am

#48 amphibian

Third possibility: could this be a move to flush sensitive equipment out where it can be seen, to make it easier to pick targets for a more stealthy strike later?

Fourth possibility: A move to get the Iranians to replace their insane regime asap?

54 Killian Bundy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:31:23am
#47 Earth2moonbat

(including such things as knowing when a thread is buried, tor example)

I think he's using Spydigg (linked on one of yesterday's threads) to see when the posts get buried.

/not sure whether or not that shows who is burying them

55 Spiritualized  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:33:35am

Fascinating and detailed article on this proposed attack, including possible routes and the hardware required:

Osirak Redux? Assessing Israeli Capabilities to Destroy Iranian Nuclear Facilities”

The foregoing assessment is far from definitive in its evaluation of Israeli military potential. However it does seem to indicate that the IAF, after years of modernization, now possesses the capability to destroy even well-hardened targets in Iran with some degree of confidence. The operation appears to be no more risky than the earlier attack on Osirak and provides at least as much benefit in terms of delaying Iranian development of nuclear weapons. This benefit might not be worth the operational risk and political cost. Nonetheless, this analysis demonstrates that Israeli leaders have access to the technical capability to carry out the attack. The question then becomes one of will and individual calculation. Other priorities, such as the election of Hamas to the leadership of the Palestinian Authority, the turmoil surrounding the Israeli leadership, and the Iranian leader’s recent statements about Israeli existence, may take precedence.

56 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:35:35am

#54 Killian Bundy

I suspect that, too, but you have to have a quick eye, and not ever have to pee. I was wondering if there was some other tool so you don't have to burst your bladder.

57 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:37:58am

#51 squarepeg

Which btw, is why Zoroastrianism is making a comback. I may be a little optimistic, but if any country in the islamic world has a chance of deislamifying, ironically, it's Iran.

58 Killian Bundy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:38:39am
#56 Earth2moonbat

I was wondering if there was some other tool so you don't have to burst your bladder.

Well, there's always a catheter.

/I'm beginning to sense that some people are starting to succumb to Digg addiction/obsession

59 LC LaWedgie  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:38:47am

Iran Appears Poised To Try Satellite Launch

Iran has just completed conversion of a powerful ballistic missile into a satellite launch vehicle. But the 25-30-ton rocket could be a wolf in sheep's clothing to test longer-range Iranian missile technologies

.

Iran rocket claim raises tension

It quoted the head of Iran's aerospace research centre, Mohsen Bahrami, as saying that "the rocket was carrying material intended for research created by the ministries of science and defence".

However, Ali Akbar Golrou, executive director of the same facility, was later quoted by Fars news agency as saying the craft launched by was a sub-orbital rocket for scientific research.

Iran issues 'ultimatum' to Israel's allies

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Friday threatened any country that supports Israel, and said the United States and its allies had “imposed a group of terrorists” on the region with their support of Israel.
---
“We have advised the Europeans that the Americans are far away, but you are the neighbors of the nations in this region. We inform you that the nations are like an ocean that is welling up, and if a storm begins, the dimensions will not stay limited to Palestine, and you may get hurt,” he said.

60 Beagle  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:43:36am

I hope Israel is also working on civil defense measures to go along with plans for a preemtive strike. If this happens, it's not going to be quick, effective, or limited to a couple nations. Unless Iran decides to shake off the ayatollahs and return to its Persian roots, "jahiliyyah" be damned, those in charge of Iran will continue to base their raison d'etre (pardon my accent-less French) around the destruction of Israel.

Islam's eschatology is now a serious geopolitical problem. Dore Gold's book came out right on schedule. Everyone should read it.

I think it's the Great Abrahamic MCF. If all three faiths want to go to the mat with their end times theories at once, there's going to be some 'splainin to do after the bombs fall.

"Well, uh, peanut butter smudges on the book made us think that was going to happen..."

61 mattm  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:45:15am

The the bombing begin ASAP.

62 bob tail  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:46:03am

#49 Killian Bundy

Let's hope and have the fingers crossed that Israel's not going to its second fiasco after its shameful defeat to the Mullahs in Libanon last Summer

Um, just how do you figure that Israel was defeated?

/last time I checked, Hezbollah got it's ass kicked and most of the infrastructure in the parts of Lebanon they control still lies in ruin

Well, I'm afraid you're hardly informed: Hizbollah hs now even more missiles than it has had before the war, it sits again on the border, the Israeli chief of staff had to step doen because of the fiasco, the relationship between th US and Israel has deterirated, because the American have expected that Israel would eredicate the Hizbollah and the Syrian garisson operating also against the American in Iraq

It looks you're new here, aren't you?

63 squarepeg  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:47:04am

Well, I just can't resist this OT, and then I won't say another word about it.

Hillary's blog finally posted its first entry! None of my submissions made it. Waah.

There's this bumper sticker, "Run Hillary Run." Democrats are putting it on their back bumper, Republicans are putting it on their front bumper.

Senator, if you knew then what you know now, would you still have married Bill Clinton? Were you misled into your decision to go to the altar?

64 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:47:07am

#54 Killian Bundy

/not sure whether or not that shows who is burying them

It does, but you have to have a quick eye. I don't know if a clever script can capture those things, or not. I'm sure that if you had all the time in the world, you could modify the javascript that drives the spy thingy.......

65 solomonpanting  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:48:26am

#57 Earth2moonbat

I may be a little optimistic, but if any country in the islamic world has a chance of deislamifying, ironically, it's Iran.

And here's another factor, however small, that may aid in that process:

Iran vows crackdown on 'inappropriately' dressed women

66 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:50:02am

Bob Tail Registered lizardoid since: 10/29/06 05:14:53 PM

No. of comments posted: 75

Says: It looks you're new here, aren't you?

To: Killian Bundy Registered lizardoid since: 10/06/04 06:31:39 PM

No. of comments posted: 9,669

Chutzpah, or stupidity? You decide......

67 Bobbo  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:50:22am

Just remember Ezekiel chapter 38. The Arab Muslims never attack Israel. It is the non-Arab muslim countries + Russia.

The chapter even gives the actual countries. Libya, Sudan, Iran, etc., etc. About Russia, it quotes God as saying, "I will no longer be known as 'The God Who Brought You Out of Egypt', I will be known as 'The God Who Destroyed Russia'". Yes, it appears God has a special place in Hell for Russia due to its anti-semitism. My favorite part of the prophesy is where scripture says, "I will turn Russia around from pointing its military north to the south." Hmmmm...weren't their missiles pointed over the north pole at US?!?!?!

68 Bobbo  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:55:27am

#57 Earth2moonbat

Which btw, is why Zoroastrianism is making a comback. I may be a little optimistic, but if any country in the islamic world has a chance of deislamifying, ironically, it's Iran.

The scripture actually says that Iran and Egypt become Christian nations after everything is said and done!

69 looking closely  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:56:27am

#48

(See my post #27)

The stories might be true, they might not. But the fact that they are being leaked into the lay press to me strongly suggests that they are plants.

The idea, of course, being to increase pressure on the Iranian regime.

70 Beagle  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 8:59:07am

#67 Bobbo

I'm reminded of Dire Straits: "...two men saying they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong..."

71 Killian Bundy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:00:02am
#62 bob tail

Well, I'm afraid you're hardly informed: Hizbollah hs now even more missiles than it has had before the war

Got a linky for that?

the Israeli chief of staff had to step doen because of the fiasco

Again, how was Israel defeated, because they didn't level Beirut and kill everyone? By every metric of warfare, Hezbollah got it's ass kicked.

the relationship between th US and Israel has deterirated, because the American have expected that Israel would eredicate the Hizbollah and the Syrian garisson operating also against the American in Iraq

The U.S. expected Israel to go to war with Syria, really? Of course, you have a linky for that too, right?

It looks you're new here, aren't you?

Yeah, I'm new here, that's pretty funny, how could you tell, did you click my football or something?

/you probably think we're losing in Iraq too

72 solomonpanting  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:04:03am

#66 Earth2moonbat

Chutzpah, or stupidity? You decide......

Door number two, Monty.

73 engineboss  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:04:41am

I wonder why a country , say the US, does'nt flood Iran with counterfeit Iranian money? I bet it would'nt take 6 months to throw their economy into a worse mess than it already is. The russians are complaining about not getting paid by them now. We could pay for oil with " funny " money. Woo Hoo

74 FQ Kafir  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:04:51am

#25 evil zionist

Qatar, Oman, And UAE - Rock on!

The UAE, though outwardly friendly to western interests, is rife with deep-pocketed sponsors of terrorism (the ones you will never hear about). If the UAE is willing to allow overflights, it is because they are salivating in anticipation of the aftermath. The complicity of the UAE should be viewed as a red-flag.

From Blanton's And Ashton's:

* Two of the 9/11 hijackers were from the UAE.
* The UAE does not recognize Israel.
* The UAE hosts the Zayed International Center for Coordination and Follow-Up. The executive director of the Zayed International Center for Coordination and Follow-Up has called Jews "the enemies of all nations." The center has sponsored lectures and publications that claim "Zionists" were responsible for the Holocaust. The Zayed Center is named for Sheikh Zayed Al Nahyan, the leader of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) since 1971.
* The UAE was one of only three countries that recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
* The UAE has been a major transfer point for shipments of nuclear components to Iran, North Korea and Lybia.
* After 9/11, the Treasury Department reported that the UAE was not cooperating in efforts to track down Osama bin Laden's bank accounts.
75 Killian Bundy  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:06:20am
#62 bob tail

Oh yeah, here's some software you might find useful:

ieSpell

/'cause spelling doesn't seem to be your forte

76 RoyalCanadian  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:18:21am

#75

Hey Killian Bundy leave bob tail alone he took ESl
(English as a Satanic Language) and was at the top of his clash!

77 Bobbo  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:23:56am

#70 Beagle

I'm reminded of Dire Straits: "...two men saying they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong..."

Wow! I am terrible when it comes to music and lyrics. Thanks, I like that quote. And their music.

What I find fastenating about that chapter (Ez 38) is how many folks don't know it and don't want to know it. Covenent theologians, with their view, want to say that God is not really going to do what he says, yet, they say they believe in him. This is the same God (and from the same Old Testament) that brought the Jews out of Eygpt like He said and brought Jesus (just like He said), brought back the state of Israel (just like He said) and they don't believe He is actually going to do what He said in that chapter. And God references that what is coming is actually a bigger event than bringing the Jews out of Egypt (by saying He will be known as a new name). I just don't get the human mind.

78 nyc redneck  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:44:25am

hey #57 earth2moonbat. i also agree the persians could come out of the stone age if they could get rid of their barbarian rulers. i would hate to see them become collateral damage if we have to nuke the place. I GUESS THINGS ARE GOING TO GET UGLY NO MATTER WHAT. even if israel neutralizes iran the cauldron will continue to boil toward the inevitable big show down.

79 Mark1957  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:50:10am
Iran issues 'ultimatum' to Israel's allies

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Friday threatened any country that supports Israel, and said the United States and its allies had “imposed a group of terrorists” on the region with their support of Israel.
---
“We have advised the Europeans that the Americans are far away, but you are the neighbors of the nations in this region. We inform you that the nations are like an ocean that is welling up, and if a storm begins, the dimensions will not stay limited to Palestine, and you may get hurt,” he said.

Seems to me that "I'm-a-Dinner-Jacket & Co." is now playing to the role of "Virgil 'The Turk' Sollozzo vis a vis the "Five Families" of the Middle East. The Iranians once had their uses to the Saudis, the Hashemites, et. al., but now they're loose cannons and threatening to totally upset the cannolli cart.

This is very bad for business. Therefore, I suspect the Five Families have already had a "sit-down" and decided to whack "I'm-a-Dinner-Jacket" or, at the very least, cut him down to manageable size. And they'll conveniently ignore the details as to how the hit is carried out.

The Five Families may still dislike Israel, but they understand, more than ever, that the Israelis are level-headed and are willing to negotiate.

80 Sihlus  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:50:16am

#75 Killian Bundy

Hey, KB, don't be too hard on the kid. He's just into Phase 2. Been here long enough to have opinions, but not long enough to realize they're not necessarily Gospel.

8^)

81 nyc redneck  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 9:58:04am

#43 royal canadian, jimmy carter is a mean old spiteful jealous hag...look how he enjoys going all medea on his own country.

82 Sihlus  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 10:08:31am

#81 nyc redneck

look how he enjoys going all medea on his own country.

LOL! I was scratching my head about the spelling until I remembered the play. Don't do that to an old man.

83 itellu3times  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 10:20:39am

I see everyone was quick to notice the map says Saudi Arabia would have to cooperate to make the gulf states interesting, but there was a burble in the news a few weeks ago that just maybe, the Sunni Arabs would give some cooperation to Israel in order to let them attack the Shiite Persians.

But I'll add another thing, also already mentioned, "overflight" won't do it, either. Even for exit routing, it has to involve landing and fuel, restroom and meals, if not full base-building. Can't see any Muslim and/or Arab state agreeing to that, or if they did, I hope (and expect) the Israelis to be on the lookout for treachery of all sorts.

But frankly, I don't think that Israel has the payload capacity to make this work. Only the US, with B-1, B-2 and B-52, full stealth and suppression support, AWACs and all, has the power and payload.

Well, even a fully debunked story like this probably puts a few turbans in a twist, so what the heck.

84 amphibian  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 10:27:51am

#53 squarepeg:

Fourth possibility: A move to get the Iranians to replace their insane regime asap?

I'm not sure that's in their (or our) best interest, unless it is as radical a regime change as the one that put the mullocracy in power in the first place. Changing one set of Khomeni-worshipping nut jobs for another, more "moderate" one, will not change the Islamic Republic's core policies, though it might slow down their nuclear weapons program.

85 amphibian  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 10:40:37am

#82 Silhus:

LOL! I was scratching my head about the spelling until I remembered the play. Don't do that to an old man.

Heh. Now that you mention it.

Will there be fiery dragons involved at some point, or is Jhimmy just going to get a one-way trip on an Iranian space rocket?

86 Airedale  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 10:58:16am

The source article seems to be Israel, right?
I am waiting for al Jazeera to pass sentence on this "abomination" declared by Qatar, Oman, And UAE . Then again, this could be a volley shot across the mullahs bow. The Middle East Cold War has the Sunni rank and file falling in against the Shia Persians.
dunno, saber rattlers are moving the pawns in this game

#83 itellu3times
I got my own theories about overflights ect.
What if the Israeli owned jets are painted up in the colors of "Yankee Doodle Dandy" US Air force types and are already sitting in the hangars of those countries?
what if the ground crew breaks out the spray paint at dusk,
launches the jet machines in the cover of darkness, and after their mission over Iranian targets,
they bingo somewhere over the gulf to gas up and fly home around the Saudi peninsula?

maybe not but it cuts the cost of a round trip down considerably.

Maybe the whole thing is to get the mullahs thinking along just those lines of planning,
get them to launch an unprovoked attack on Qatar, Oman, And UAE ?


But just the same, an article like this could get those little kingdoms by the sea feeling like they are in hot sea water with those fellows just over the seaward horizon.

brinksmanship

87 Grobe  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 11:00:34am

By 2004 Israel had a total of 25 F-15l's which are equivalent to the U.S F-15E Strike Eagle. This aircraft has a combat radius of about 2300 km's which puts most of Irans nuke sites well within range. With some U.S.air to air refueling and maybe some Saudi AWAC's help the mission is doable.

88 WarCriminal  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 12:19:21pm

I found this article quite interesting.


[Link: www.frontpagemag.com...]

89 WarCriminal  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 1:03:38pm

This keeps getting better and better...tick tock goes the clock. [Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

90 big L  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 2:34:17pm

Sh-h-h-h-h don't tell everyone. Some of this stuff shold be a secret,no?

91 EE  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 2:48:18pm

#89 WarCriminal
From your link:

In a speech in Tehran, he likened his country's nuclear programme to a train with no brakes and no reverse gear.

One of his deputy foreign ministers, Manouchehr Mohammadi, said they had prepared themselves for any situation arising from the issue, even for war.

Iran may be a train with no brakes, as Ahmadinejad proudly boasts, but it is hurtling over a cliff. And it is going to take much of the world with it, because they are intent on pursuing nuclear jihad to bring about the coming of the Mahdi, the 12th imam, they believe.

The world needs to understand that the Persian Mahdaviat nuclear train is not something that can be stopped by carrots or sticks, or by diplomacy. Because the Armageddon of nuclear jihad is too strongly entrenched in the Hojatieh dogma to be uprooted by such shallow things as the shedding of blood or the offering of economic incentives, or any other stick or carrot.

There is bound to be some point at which the US says "no" to the threats coming from a nuclear armed Persia. And at that point there will be no alternative but to face the prospect of war. But if there is to be war, then isn't it better that it be pursued before Iran is a nuclear power?

92 Reluctant Democrat  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 3:22:44pm

Of course they have no objection to our flyovers! They are only too willing to let the US fight their battles for them. They fear Iran as much as we do -- their monarchies would be replaced (as in, their heads on a pike) with Islamic mullahs tuit suite if the Iranians are left unchecked.

93 _remembertonyc  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 3:27:08pm

maybe if some of the arab countries (that are supposedly willing to let the IAF use their airspace) would stand up for what is decnt and right, the IAF wouldn't NEED to use their airspace

/polyanna mode off

94 kepler2007  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 6:29:24pm

Sunnis dont like Shia....and Turkey, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates are all what majority?

They just want somebody to do their dirty work for them. The turth is the sunni have much to fear from a nuclear Iran. Hell Iran might try to take Mecca from the Sunnis..

Everyday I pray for a Islamic civil war. The only victory that Iraq can bring is this. If this happens (even if Bush did not want it) it will have all been worth it. Nothing like crazed muslims wacking other crazed muslims to make this non-muslim happy.

Divide and Conquer!

95 Bill K.  Sun, Feb 25, 2007 7:24:18pm

The shortest route from Israel to Iran is over Iraq; a flight of a minimum of about a 1000 miles, probably more like 1200 depending on the destination. To go around Iraq would add another 800 miles. I would think this would be an unacceptable risk assuming that the IAF planes would have to refueled inflight.

Israel should tell the United States that it will overfly Iraq and not bother asking for permission. After all what could the U.S. do? Shoot down the Israeli planes? This would have George Bush betraying our most loyal ally for the sake of protecting the mullah's nukes. The resulting firestorm would drive Bush from office in total disgrace.

The Israelis have George Bush over a barrel and they should take full advantage of it. After all Bush hasn't done diddly squat about the Iranians so far and Israel can't afford to wait forever.

Israeli did the world a great favor when they bombed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981 but instead of thanks they were condemned by the whole world including the United States. Not one country to this day has expressed their gratitude for this daring act including the United States. In this regard Israel owes nothing to the U.S. Israel is acting in it's own self defense and must be allowed to overfly Iraq.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Limited Time Offer:  FREE $10 Online Gift Certificate with $100 Gift Card Purchase!
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Unh. can't help myself.