Excuse me.

It's Jew-liani.

Rudy
2008
2012

New slogan is out today from the Hillary camp:

"What, me worry?"

Alfred E. Neuman plans to sue.

Rudy is the man and he's got my vote. I don't see anyone in the Republican or Democratic party who is as serious about defeating Islamic terrorism.

Rudy was on Dennis Prager today talking about this very issue.

Does anybody know the other Repub candidate's views on this John Doe amendment?

JAFLW

“The terrorists are at war with us - whether or not Democrats in Washington and on the campaign trail choose to acknowledge it – and we must stay on offense to prevail.”

Don't tell Kos. He might get upset.

Rudy get's it and he'll get my vote in 2008 as well.

“The terrorists Islam is at war with us - whether or not Democrats in Washington and on the campaign trail choose to acknowledge it – and we must stay on offense to prevail.”

Fixed it...The enemy has a name.

Let us remember that the ticket handler in Maine suspected the Atta was a possible terrorist, but did nothing because he thought he would get into trouble for racial profiling. Cost to America, 3000 dead with a week, and a billion or so in building cost. Cost to date< another 3,000 dead and $200 Billion.

Meanwhile, Hillary's hosting a Happy Hour Hodown

Democrats have been saying for months now that they plan to ignore the Islamic terrorist threat during the campaign. It's a tacit admission that they are on the wrong side of this fight.

Everyone go buy this bumper sticker at Cafe Press:

Democrats: Making the world safe for TERRORISTS!

Does it fit on a bumper sticker? /John Edwards
John who? /Hillary Clinton

Thank you Rudy for saying what I don't have the forum to say...

Rudy knew.

Isn't the war on terror just a bumper sticker?

/tinfoil hat

;)

re: #10 pat

Acutally, the building costs are at least $20 billion and rising.

I'm so happy that Guliani is making a big deal out of this because I thought it way less attention than it deserved when the news first came out. How can anyone in their right mind want to destroy the rights of people who report suspicious behavior? I guess the phrase "right mind" is the answer to my question.

at least he sort of gets it, though i wish he'd call islam by it's name.

Liberal make great pets! 4 out of 5 Islamonazis agree!

lawhawk
Damn, that is one expensive building project. A bit too expensive.

and on their opposition to the “John Doe” amendment to protect Americans from being sued by the likes of CAIR for reporting suspicious behavior

Glad someone is talking about this. I suspect 99 out of a 100 people know nothing of it.

I like Rudy,but he like President Bush will not name the enemy...Mohammad wrote a war book and his followers use it...to wage war on us...somebody needs to say it...or we can't win.

Rudy is my front-runner so far. He's a little wobbly on illegal immigration, as far as I can tell, but he's the only candidate in the race so far who seems to get the fact that WE ARE AT WAR.

We'll see what Fred! has to say about it, if he jumps in...

Islamic Terrorism?

Excuse me?

I don't see how those words belong in the same sentence. Except maybe:

"There is no such thing as Islamic Terrorism"

or

"The Brown government in the UK has banned the use of the words "Islamic" and "Terrorism" in the same sentence."

or

"All we need to do to have peace with Islamic Peoples is to stop using the words "Islamic Terrorism" (and convert to Islam, pay the poll tax if you don't convert, and live under Sharia)"

or the one I use

"My head hurts from being buried in the sand as I try to avoid the obvious reality of Islamic Terrorism"

re: #24 wvobiwan

Agreed. We need to hear from Fred and Mitt. Those are (at this point in time) the only 3 contenders.

How anyone could vote for one of the uberweenie Democrats over Giuliani is beyond me. They literally live in an alternative universe.

He's got my vote.

re: #4 froghat2k

Rudy is the man and he's got my vote. I don't see anyone in the Republican or Democratic party who is as serious about defeating Islamic terrorism.

You actually believe Islamic terrorism can be "defeated"? What do you mean by "defeat"?

re: #25 lefty201

Killing two hundred million people seems a bit much to me, KOS or no.

re: #24 wvobiwan

re: #27 Mike C.

Agree completely. I like Rudy, but want to hear what Fred says about the issues facing America now.

If Rudy is our next president, I will be pleased.

If it's Fred, fine. Couldn't be anywhere near as bad as any Dem getting it.

If it's Hillary, fine. That would be the end of the Democrat party and the Clintons. She wouldn't get anything done and the country would survive no worse for wear.

Obomba? Four years of the race-card and who knows what kind of strife and division. No thanks.

GO RUDY!

re: #25 lefty201

Ike and Curtis LeMay -

re: #31 easy

how is it going to feel when 300 million americans are suddenly wiped out by nuclear bombs?

thats what they intend to do to us.

I don't for one second think there are Moderate Muslims.

wipe them all out.

re: #34 buzzsawmonkey

Hey, Buzzy! Yeah, but I think Hillary already has a running mate in mind. She knows Obomba would be second-guessing her at every turn. I don't think it would happen. She would almost rather lose than have a running-mate forced on her. Anyway, that would be the end of Obomba, too, as he would be effectively powerless, yet would have guilt by association.

re: #33 Salem "If it's Hillary, fine. That would be the end of the Democrat party and the Clintons. She wouldn't get anything done and the country would survive no worse for wear."
Gotta disagree with you on that one; I think the country would be MUCH the worse for wear.

Wow. very impressive. This is my favorite quote from Guliani:

“Last night, the leading Democratic candidates once again failed to even utter the words ‘Islamic terrorism’ at their fourth debate."

He gets it. Whether he is being fed these quotes or not, it is huge. This to mo is the NUMBER ONE issue facing our country. I am so sick of the freaking Democrats ignoring it and trying to pound on the economy. This economy is strong and in the same reahlm as "Clinton's supposed utopia". Why the MSM ignores the threat to our way of life is disgusting. I hate to say it or even think it. But, this country is never going to change. Septemeber 11 united us briefly. Then all the LLLs forgot. The barbarians saw off heads, threaten our livelihood and the left closes their eyes and puts their hands over their ears. Once Hillary or Obama gets elected and we have another attack because our foreign policy is defensive, several thousand more Americans will perish...unfortuantely judging by the past, the left will weep for a day, then forget again.

re: #31 easy

re: #25 lefty201

Killing two hundred million people seems a bit much to me, KOS or no.

Maybe so... but we should start the process and see how far we get before they finally surrender unconditionally and dump their unholy book. When those against you are fanatic and barbarous, you must be willing to be a bit barbarous yourself in order to survive and triumph.

With those following fundamental Islam, it is kill or be killed. They leave us no alternative.

If we just declare peace the whole problem will go away. It's so simple. You do see it don't you? We never would have been attacked on 9/11 if we were not in Afghanistan & Iraq.

.

“The terrorists are at war with us - whether or not Democrats in Washington and on the campaign trail choose to acknowledge it – and we must stay on offense to prevail.”

Go Rudy !

Unfortunately, Democrats only care about John Dough$...

OT:
Good news on the surge...

re: #41 opnion

If we just declare peace the whole problem will go away. It's so simple. You do see it don't you? We never would have been attacked on 9/11 if we were not in Afghanistan & Iraq.

There is strength through peace.

re: #44 buzzsawmonkey

I agree...but excuse me while I go back outside, keep building the bunker and try to stop puking...

failed to even utter the words ‘Islamic terrorism’

Now where did he get that line from?

Rudy? Is that you Rudy? Are you reading LGF?

Let's be real on this one folks... A major Presidential candidate who is seriously trying to win the office is not going to go out and say we are at war with Islam... It's just not going to happen... And you know why? Because saying that will lead to sound bytes being used by the opponent as to how intolerant they are...

Even if some of us think that this needs to be said, it just won't happen... A candidate who says it, will be a former candidate...

re: #49 tfc3rid

Let's be real on this one folks... A major Presidential candidate who is seriously trying to win the office is not going to go out and say we are at war with Islam... It's just not going to happen... And you know why? Because saying that will lead to sound bytes being used by the opponent as to how intolerant they are...

Even if some of us think that this needs to be said, it just won't happen... A candidate who says it, will be a former candidate...

what would you have them say? Come on presidential candidates! Lie some more to us! Yes YES YES! I love the lies.

re: #49 tfc3rid

Let's be real on this one folks... A major Presidential candidate who is seriously trying to win the office is not going to go out and say we are at war with Islam... It's just not going to happen... And you know why? Because saying that will lead to sound bytes being used by the opponent as to how intolerant they are...
Even if some of us think that this needs to be said, it just won't happen... A candidate who says it, will be a former candidate...

Well, that's all true because WE are not at war with islam. It's islam that is at war with us (as the main power in the world and the only one able to stop their imperialistic dreams).

How Giuliani could NOT get it is beyond me. The choice is now with the Republican voter. If he makes it, I am comfortable with it. If he doesn't, consider the Democratic alternatives, not real pretty.

-S-

Rudy's got my vote!

And, I've read his book "LEADERSHIP."

In it he points out that when he first lost the New York City Mayor's run TO: David Dinkins. He set about setting up the re-match.

Dinkins, meanwhile, couldn't get out of bed and make any decisions. So New York City really suffered. It was "after" Koch. And, before Guiliani got in.

During those 4 years Guiliani built an APPARATUS. The day he won and reached City Hall, his TEAM was ready.

He's doing this AGAIN.

Ted Olsen has joined his campaign. He's also got the top anti-terrorist group in the nation, aboard his run for office. No other candidate's got that.

What can happen up ahead? I don't think Fred Thompson will get clout outside of his very right wing circle. And, even over there, people are terrified of Hillary; and want a candidate who can win.

(Abraham Lincoln did the same thing back in 1860. He was in 4th place, going into the Republican Convention; but the other three "favorite sons" were big in their respective states and circles. While Lincoln held the ace. He had national recognition, and he could win. Yes. And, he DID WIN.

So, that within the republican party, today, you see people very attuned to WINNING in 2008. And, yes. Extending that to 2012, as well.

The other candidate who's glib with the microphones? Newt Gingrich. What you don't see, however, is Tom DeLay. Who can beat the living crap out of Gingrich; and who can prove to the American people, that when Newt was handed the GOP victory inh 1994, he spent a decade SQUANDERING IT.

So, sure. Up ahead there will be movement on the field. Noses will stick forward. And, McCain? He's just waiting for the FEC money to kick in. Then, he departs. (How honorable is that?) Not very.

And, the worst, for Bush, is over. His positions are well known. And, he's not in a spiral, down, anymore.

Up ahead? Well, that will depend on the congress. And, Bush still has his veto pen.

What have the Bonkeys got? Enough Botox to fool you about facial expressions? Really?

re: #42 Poitiers-Lepanto

Peter King...against terrorism...except when it's Irish terrorism.
Peter King and Noraid

re: #49 tfc3rid

Let's be real on this one folks... A major Presidential candidate who is seriously trying to win the office is not going to go out and say we are at war with Islam... It's just not going to happen... And you know why? Because saying that will lead to sound bytes being used by the opponent as to how intolerant they are...

Even if some of us think that this needs to be said, it just won't happen... A candidate who says it, will be a former candidate...

That is what is wrong with the electorate. Sticking our head in the sand will only get more Americans killed. This is going to be a huge "I TOLD YOU SO" moment...Rudy is basically warning the electorate about the softness of the left. When it happens, and it will when Hillary or Obama gets elected...I hope he stands up and says it...

i think i like Jew-dy Jew-liani...maybe he should be in drag for that one.

re: #51 Poitiers-Lepanto

You know what I mean though, regardless of how I put it... No candidate on the side of the GOP (or Dems) would say something like that in this non-stop 24/7 news covered world... The PC police would arrest them, convict them and sentance them to the needle in 30 minutes...

re: #55 cblesz

This whole election is an I TOLD YOU SO moment... If the right person is not elected to the White House, I fear millions will die... Either because they are too stupid to understand the true nature of our enemy, or they honestly are naive enough to think that Islamic terrorists can simply walk away...

Go Rudy!

Romney-Giuliani would be my dream ticket, but I would
happily get behind a Giuliani-Romney ticket, too.

Don't forget Romney said the govt. should be tapping mosques
and even better he got CAIR-MO Hooper worked into a frenzy
over it.

re: #57 tfc3rid

your right. They would be crucified. Thats why you need a sacrificial lamb in the race to pull that stunt off. Like Tancredo.

re: #61 lefty201

However, to many of us here, Tancredo is a logical choice, not simply a 'sacrificial lamb'.

However, he gets no play because of his perception as a 'lone gunman'...

... they just don’t get the Terrorists’ War on Us ...

Giuliani not only understands the war, he knows how to frame it. He's strongly countering the fallacy that this is somehow "Bush's war". This is crucial.

re: #62 tfc3rid

he's perfect for the bill. Send him in to charge the base, then let him loose so that when he goes overboard, he can be thrown under the bus and the publican nominee can say how much more moderate they are than him. you already have a charged base that would follow the party through hell and back, you r a winner.

pres. rudy

(had to grab some lunch)

re: #44 buzzsawmonkey

He would bring immense strength to a Hillary run: together, they would constitute the "historic" ticket--First Woman, First Black Man--and lots of people would vote for the ticket on that basis. He's got the warm-fuzzy-loveability to take the edge off Hillary's more grating aspects; he covers her ass with the rabidly antiwar left, and she can still feign enough "toughness" to play to the squashy, on-the-fence-about-the-war center.

You've certainly got a sterling point there. Again, I just think Hillary is already sweating at the prospect of a VP Obomba trying to go over her head to appeal to his base, making her effectively a co-president. I just don't see how she could stomach that.

re: Edwards, I thought he would be doing much better right now. Of course the guy makes an idiot of himself every time he opens his mouth (he's no Bill Clinton, rhetorically speaking) but he has that hairdo and look to appeal to the shallow majority of Dem voters. I'm shocked that he's getting the reception he so richly deserves.

re: #64 lefty201

I think it could actually hurt more than help in the scenario you talk about... The Conservative base is already feeling excluded... A candidate that is clearly to the Middle overall will not appeal to the Conservative base...

However, when a middle-of-the-roader is compared to Shrillary...

I think I would rather have the devil I know in Hillary, than the devil I don't know in Obama. I just have one very important question that I need answered.

WHO THE HELL IS OBAMA?

3 years ago, we never heard of the guy. Now he's americas sweetheart? WTF?!?

I wonder what would happen if the american public wrote in no confidence on the ballot?

re: #66 Salem

Shrillary-Obama ticket reminds me of a line from the US version of 'The Office'...

Women and blacks... 'The olympics of Suffering'

In the show Steve Carrell was hosting 'Diversity Day' and made post its to put on employees head showing a 'race' and saying to talk about your issues... The 'Olympics of Suffering' line came out when it was a person playing 'black' and another playing 'Jewish'

#4 froghat2k:
Rudy is the man and he's got my vote. I don't see anyone in the Republican or Democratic party who is as serious about defeating Islamic terrorism.

Tom Tancredo is. Folks seem to forget that securing the border is paramount to stopping terrorism on our homefront. I'm not saying that I would vote for Tom at this point, but he has been a staunch advocate for fighting terrorism and naming the true enemy, and deserves mention in reply to your post.

Rudy has my vote - he gets the war, but he also has the communication skills the office requires and he showed his leadership skills before, on, and after 9/11.

re: #49 tfc3rid

In the current environment, yes, that's probably true. But one thing the Dems seem disastrously unprepared (aside from Biden, I guess) for is another big attack, which would alter the equation drastically. Another reason I'm not too concerned about the Dems getting it at this point. At least Hillary is trying to walk the razor rather than jumping in head-first like Obomba and that deluded chump Richardson.

re: #68 lefty201

Obama is a product of the MSM... They get everything they could ever want... An intelligent, good looking, well spoken man with an attractive wife, who happens to be a Black American...

they wanted him to be a rockstar... They've made him, they will never drop him...

re: #30 freetoken

re: #4 froghat2k
... You actually believe Islamic terrorism can be "defeated"? What do you mean by "defeat"?

Sure islamic terrorism can be defeated, by showing the world that they represent backwardness and that the future belongs to democracy, freedom and reason.

At the moment islamic terrorism has radical chic, thanks mainly to the anti-American "left". When they're seen for the evil losers they are, the phenomenon will disappear.

Islamic terrorism should be the death throes of islam; go back to 7th century misery or join the modern world. We should make that choice easy.

#5 Colonel Panik

Yeah, I heard Rudy this a.m. on Prager on the way to work. Dennis specifically told Rudy that the 'John Doe' issue is a great weapon to use against the Dems and actually pushed him to make the point. Same story on the 'Islamic terrorism' issue.

Rudy is taking advice from talk show hosts!

This is very interesting. As we know, the media you hear determines your POV, and if Rudy is any indication, the Republicans are figuring out how to address and mollify their electorate. This is probably good, especially for Rudy, and look for more of this from the other candidates.

As for Dennis and the other talk show hosts, the scramble for short, consulting interviews will pick up very quickly . . .

John Doe bill would have been THE issue to hear last night, so of course we didn't. And there was Hillary, all waiting to defend her vote FOR IT! And there was Obama, who *abstained*! Oh, I wonder what he had prepared there?

re: #69 tfc3rid

LOL! Well, that does put an interesting spin on it.

re: #44 buzzsawmonkey

He would bring immense strength to a Hillary run: together, they would constitute the "historic" ticket--First Woman, First Black Man--and lots of people would vote for the ticket on that basis. He's got the warm-fuzzy-loveability to take the edge off Hillary's more grating aspects; he covers her a** ...

Oh pleeze find another way of sayin that!

re: #76 itellu3times

Oh yeah, definitely. There are the voting records out there, too. Don't get too excited yet, people, we haven't gotten to the bottleneck of the campaign; that's white-knuckle time for the "ho" factor.

#40 cookielady

With those following fundamental Islam, it is kill or be killed. They leave us no alternative.

I would say islamistists, those actually acting on their fundamental beliefs. If I were able I would be there, my son was, but I simply don't think the indiscriminate killing of people we are trying to liberate is a good idea. I'm sure you would rather be handing out cookies as well.

While I appreciate Mr. Guiliani's comments regarding the ineffectual and dangerous Democratic presidential candidates, I do not feel that he is the candidate for me unless he is all there is when the time comes. If the Republican party once again puts me in the position of voting for the lesser of two evils, I don't know what I will ultimately do...

What we need is a solid conservative candidate who communicates well, has leadership skills and is an absolute realist when it comes to Islam.

Not gonna happen, sad to say.

re: #80 easy

#40 cookielady

With those following fundamental Islam, it is kill or be killed. They leave us no alternative.

I would say islamistists, those actually acting on their fundamental beliefs. If I were able I would be there, my son was, but I simply don't think the indiscriminate killing of people we are trying to liberate is a good idea. I'm sure you would rather be handing out cookies as well.

I certainly would. They would give them back with bombs in them.

Oh, BTW, if Bill doesn't want Obomba on Hillary's ticket, and I have no reason to assume he does (look at Sharpton and Jackson waiting for this to play out) then it's not going to happen. Bill and Hill run the mob. What they want, they get. This is why Hillary, with her current numbers, is a shoe-in for the nomination (though I didn't believe it a few months ago) and no one gets to tell her who her poodle will be.

Bill and Hill run the mob.

Oopsy! Shouldn't have let that one slip, now people will think I'm bananas.

No, you twit, they're all two threads out now.

Ah yes. Well, all is well, then.

why was my post #25 deleted?

Rudy just doesn't understand that we need to send the President of the United States to sit down and TALK to Osama bin Laden! Or maybe invite OBL here, with a nice sleepover in the Lincoln Bedroom. Under President Obama, we'll see this dream come true. Hugs, everyone!

The Democrat party is ruled by their left-wing base.
The modern Democrat party can be summed up in two words:

MICHAEL
MOORE

"There is no terrorist threat..."
-- Michael Moore

This is why the Dems cannot even mention "islamic Terrorism".

I'm still watching Rudy closely. Defending ourselves and our unborn children are important issues to me.

Even if Fred gets it, still Rudy is a man. Rudy is the only person in the race, Republican or Democrat, who proved that he can get things done.

It is not a right time to give sombody without proven record a chance to learn, no matter how concervative is Fred Thompson.

Go Rudy, our last best hope.

hmm, looks like Rudy's been reading LGF!

Terrorists’ War on Us™

He is turning that into quite a slogan. It is true that they have declared war on us and it is a war that they want and we do not want but must fight nonetheless. Also, as long as the Dems control Congress it will be a one way war -- them waging total war on us, and us waging a limited (yet much more expensive) form of warfare against them. When will we wake up, wage total war and drain the swamps from which this monster rises? When will we forbid any nexus between Islam and politics? In any nation? In any part of the world? Forever?

Last week, I went over to Palm Beach and volunteered for Rudy at our local phone calling center. I must have called 100 people to get their views on who they'll be voting for.
Tonight's a strategy meeting for all RUDY volunteers at one of our local Rebuplican representative's house...Carl Domino.
I'm putting my time and my money on Rudy!
WE'VE GOT TO FREAKING BEAT HILLARY!
By the way, I have been passing on comments from LGF to the chairman (woman) from Rudy's campaign. I told her that Rudy ( or someone from his staff) needs to keep their eyes on LGF to get a sense of where we're coming from. I think they are listening!

“The terrorists are at war with us - whether or not Democrats in Washington and on the campaign trail choose to acknowledge it – and we must stay on offense to prevail.”

Rudy is great about staying on message.

GO RUDY!

#87 Occasional Reader 7/24/2007 11:34:50 am PDT reply quote

Rudy just doesn't understand that we need to send the President of the United States to sit down and TALK to Osama bin Laden! Or maybe invite OBL here, with a nice sleepover in the Lincoln Bedroom. Under President Obama, we'll see this dream come true. Hugs, everyone!

Democrats are busy making excuses for why it won't be their fault when we are attacked again, while simultaneously working to make sure we are.

re: #53 Carol Herman

Rudy's got my vote!

And, I've read his book "LEADERSHIP."

In it he points out that when he first lost the New York City Mayor's run TO: David Dinkins. He set about setting up the re-match.

Dinkins, meanwhile, couldn't get out of bed and make any decisions. So New York City really suffered. It was "after" Koch. And, before Guiliani got in.

During those 4 years Guiliani built an APPARATUS. The day he won and reached City Hall, his TEAM was ready.

He's doing this AGAIN.

Ted Olsen has joined his campaign. He's also got the top anti-terrorist group in the nation, aboard his run for office. No other candidate's got that.

What can happen up ahead? I don't think Fred Thompson will get clout outside of his very right wing circle. And, even over there, people are terrified of Hillary; and want a candidate who can win.

(Abraham Lincoln did the same thing back in 1860. He was in 4th place, going into the Republican Convention; but the other three "favorite sons" were big in their respective states and circles. While Lincoln held the ace. He had national recognition, and he could win. Yes. And, he DID WIN.

So, that within the republican party, today, you see people very attuned to WINNING in 2008. And, yes. Extending that to 2012, as well.

The other candidate who's glib with the microphones? Newt Gingrich. What you don't see, however, is Tom DeLay. Who can beat the living crap out of Gingrich; and who can prove to the American people, that when Newt was handed the GOP victory inh 1994, he spent a decade SQUANDERING IT.

So, sure. Up ahead there will be movement on the field. Noses will stick forward. And, McCain? He's just waiting for the FEC money to kick in. Then, he departs. (How honorable is that?) Not very.

And, the worst, for Bush, is over. His positions are well known. And, he's not in a spiral, down, anymore.

Up ahead? Well, that will depend on the congress. And, Bush still has his veto pen.

What have the Bonkeys got? Enough Botox to fool you about facial expressions? Really?

The morning after Guiliani got elected he & his team arrived with the blue prints of city hall at a local eatery, "Cronie's" on 88th & Second. At the time there was a huge stuffed gorilla that sat at a nearby table. When we sat down, my girlfriend and I said "when the guys come in sit them over here," (next table). "Which guys?" the waiter asked. "You'll know them when you see them," said I, facetiously, not expecting His mayoral himself! Looking back now, it was very memorable moment.

While disappointed with the way he'd announced his divorce to Donna Hanover, he's since proven his mettle, and certainly GETS IT. We're at war. We need a war president.

Seriously, how hard is it for every candidate from every party to talk straight? Rudy has flaws, but I love the straight talk. At least you know what the hell he is standing for and against whether you agree or not. NONE of the Democrats running do this. It's all curve balls with these people.

If the Democratic party was a porn movie, it'd be something involving vasoline, ball gags, and ex-president masks.

RUDY!

re: #91 bebe's boobs destroy

hmm, looks like Rudy's been reading LGF!

That's what I thought, Bebes.

I would vote for Romney...but if Rudy wins the GOP nod, he'd better make Mitt his veep. These guys get it--and they're pissed at the islamofascists. Plus they've managed governments, something Obama probably read about at Accidental Collage Occidental College and Fascist U. Columbia U., but has never done.

Don't forget, Obama is a lawyer.

So the Dems are afraid that it would lead to Racial profiling...
So lets err on the side of Americas safety... after all it is too late when you are up at 32,000 feet...
If the Law does pan out as being misused or abused... change it... Lawmakers LOVE to make laws!

Oh! and if the Politicians flew with us "COMMON FOLK"... the might think twice about this bill.

Fred/Guiliani. That would be a major avalanche!

Atta boy, Rudy! Give 'em the heater, forget about the curveball!

Living in NYC-I know Rudy and some like him and some do not, personally I like and trust the man and he will have my vote.

“This morning, congressional Democrats are once again showing they just don’t get the Terrorists’ War on Us by attempting to strip important protections for those who report suspected terrorists on airlines."

Why is he limiting his comment to terrorists on airplanes? Obviously a Jewlianian schlip.

re: #1 Ben Hur

Excuse me.

It's Jew-liani.

Which makes precisely no sense, but what else is new?

Rudy just went up a tick in my book.

A Fred!/Rudy ticket would rock.