First lit me say thanks for the new thread

Thank you...Bill is a tool of the MSM and a sock puppet...time to boycott his show...just don't watch...watch other Fox shows...just not his.

Bill O'Reilly is not enough!

And I expected it because I communicated with O'Reilly's producer today and saw which way this was headed.

I prefer Chris Hitchen's take on reality featured in an earlier thread here today.

Oy Vey!
Stanislav is in trouble!

bill O'shameless sucks

O'Reilly also stood up for Dan Rather, remember. This is far from the first time he's been on the wrong side.

Michelle tried to talk some sense into him, but he's a bit thickheaded.

Hey, they don't call it "Fair and Balanced" for nothing. When you take both sides on every issue, you can never be wrong.

O'reilly for better or worse represents main stream America...
a.k.a. the Jury...

Hear Hear!

re: #5 Luigi

I prefer Chris Hitchen's take on reality featured in an earlier thread here today.

I wish I had seen it (need to get my new TV hooked up) so I'd know his talking points.

My opinion is that the whole idea of "hate crime" is totally wrong - crime should be dealt with as crime. If intent can be proven and is criminal, then we have laws for that. Inciting riot is ALREADY a crime, without the damn "hate crime." Is that as opposed to a love ya crime? It's just wrong.

Hate is an emotion, and we should not have emotional laws. We're getting into a dangerous area here. We're not anywhere near as bad as the poor Euros, but it's (cliche coming) a slippery slope.

I was quite dissapointed at his stance on this topic. I agree with Michelle, and many lizards here, that "hate speech" is a danger to free speech and thought.

/Drip, drip, drip.

Perhaps Bill needs to see THIS

This is sad. Very sad. While I agree with O'Reilly on many things, this is beyond "fair and balanced" and well into absurd. Was it motivated by hate? Who knows. Maybe. Is it a felony? Oh come ON. Throwing a book in the toilet a felony? Was it smart? Who knows. Who cares. If someone threw a Torah into a toilet I'd feel sad, but hardly believe that person should be charged with a felony. I am terribly disappointed. I was just going to turn his show on, but I guess I'll wait for Hannity. I need a glass of wine.

Its probably a good idea to start writing O'reilly some mail...

He wants that kid to go to prison for a hate crime...that book he flushed...was the spark that killed 3,ooo American's on 9-11.

re: #19 mollyshark

Make mine a double girl!

Question.
Pinch a loaf in the Book of Mormon. It that a hate crime?

Also see:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

O'Reilly is a fool. I'm going to submerge several Qur'ans in the toilet as a sign of solidarity with this guy.

O'Reilly sides with laws that protect religious expression, above other forms of speech. Unfortunately, in a time of war, when a global imperialist movement is promoted under the guise of religion, this can be fatal.

To prove that he is highly inconsistent, and far from an intellectual thinker, I recall when O'Reilly defended Mel Gibson's movie, over objections that anti-semitic speech was included.

What's in your toilet?

Cattt,

I wish I had seen it (need to get my new TV hooked up) so I'd know his talking points.

Check Hot Air a bit later. They should probably have the segment up.

I liked how Bill O used "intimation techniques of the left" to segue into the next segment with Michelle and Kirsten. Like CAIR doesn't do this.

re: #4 Charles

And I expected it because I communicated with O'Reilly's producer today and saw which way this was headed.

The good news is that over the years, more and more, - they take your calls and at least listen.

EgO'Reilly.

O'Reilly is wrong on this. If it was a bible it would be called art by liberals and O'Reilly would defend it by saying it is disgusting but free speech.

re: #26 FightingBack

O'Reilly sides with laws that protect religious expression, above other forms of speech. Unfortunately, in a time of war, when a global imperialist movement is promoted under the guise of religion, this can be fatal.

To prove that he is highly inconsistent, and far from an intellectual thinker, I recall when O'Reilly defended Mel Gibson's movie, over objections that anti-semitic speech was included.

Could there be glimmers of anti semitism here then or is that paranoid thinkin?

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

O'Reilly is a fart in the conservative elevator.

I"m not surprised. Don't the a-rabs own some stock in Fox? What do you expect? The No Spin Zone.. my buttocks!

The more I hear about this, the more disgusted I get. I can't begin to understand what goes through people's minds! Hate crimes laws should be an affront to any true American, with the tendency as seen in this case for discrimination. As anyone here knows, the rules would be applied entirely differently, if it were a Bible, or a Torah!

While I believe Stanislav should have flushed his own copy of the Koran, Blowhard O'Reilly is wrong. This event is not a felony charge s. I was arguing with some moonbats last Friday that Billy is a populist, they said he wasn't. He is.

He's constantly seeing us losing this war, some kind of idea that Iraqi's don't want to stand up. It's getting old.

'The Tune Out Factor'

re: #36 Charles

Ugh.

I am waiting to see what Hannity says...I don't hold out much hope.

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

Did you anger them by turning them down? (Good for you.)

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

I posted this before I saw yours...lol

re: #18 Angel

Perhaps Bill needs to see THIS

I like that tune.

re: #36 Charles

Charles..isnt this legally NON negotiable?
Either this behavoir is classified as a felony or not?

and how the heck can they ambush LGF?..pfftt!

He should just go back to being a reporter for Inside Edition. That's where he has always belonged. And give Michelle Malkin his old spot.

The bright side is that if O'Reilly is talking about this, the story will get out.

There is no way that burning a flag during a protest, immersing a cross in urine, or screaming "Zionism is Racism", would be fine, even protected, yet at the same time, flushing a Koran is hate speech. The crazy double standards must be publicized.

Bummer, Bill. I agree with so much of your opinions. This one I don't agree with.

Barry Popik posted something the other night that's very pertinent:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Note that the community is now calling for tougher hate crime laws.

This is a bad direction for america. If you look at the federal hate crimes legislation still in committee in the Senate, and who the sponsors are you can see what's coming at the federal level. (Hint: Ted Kennedy, D-Massachusetts is the Key Sponsor, and the rest of the roll mostly have "D"s by their names)

Hate crimes laws are anti-american and anti-freedom -- this sword has two edges, no hilt, and who's more likely to get cut by it?

re: #44 song_and_dance_man

Even though I'm a liberal I still ride the conservative elevator while the liberal one's out of service.

O'R needs to stay away from discussions of Islam, jihad and the Koran. He makes a complete fool of himself every time he goes there. Hopefully, Michelle will fix that when she takes over.

re: #47 Krampus

Kinda catchy aint it...not a bad overview either~!

re: #41 gooddad

'The Tune Out Factor'

When he started doing body language and trivia I did. I watched tonight to see what his position was. Was that Bill unzipping CAIR's spokesIman?

re: #16 Cattt

I wish I had seen it (need to get my new TV hooked up) so I'd know his talking points.

My opinion is that the whole idea of "hate crime" is totally wrong - crime should be dealt with as crime. If intent can be proven and is criminal, then we have laws for that. Inciting riot is ALREADY a crime, without the damn "hate crime." Is that as opposed to a love ya crime? It's just wrong.

Hate is an emotion, and we should not have emotional laws. We're getting into a dangerous area here. We're not anywhere near as bad as the poor Euros, but it's (cliche coming) a slippery slope.

Didja go with the High Def? Enquiring TechnoNerds want to know!

Hannity follows what President Bush says about Islam... Charles...I think you are right.

re: #36 Charles

good thing you had the hamsters to tend to. though you could've held your own.

What is Bill's logic? He is usually very aticulate in his opinions. As he is a reasonable guy, what is his reasoning?

O'Reilley is like Beck that they blend a sort of populism with Occasional Conservatism, but BigHead is wrong on Iraq, wrong on the reasons for oil price rises & declines, wrong on this Koran Flush issue, and AWOL on too many important issues

He does Occasional Good, but the price is high

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

What happened? Away from the tube.

I talked to O'Reilly once on the radio. He was talking about the Iraq war being about WMDs and my comment was that it was about terrorism. He disagredd and insisted it was about WMDs.

This is why I only watch Britt Hume's news analysis show, and the normal nightly news. I even have problems with Hannity at times.

re: #55 mrfocus

OH My God, He even tries to sing on his radio show, More...

'Tune Out Factor'

Man, O'Riley...you are a tool.

Who is looking out for me? Certainly not you...

O'Reilly was wrong in the beginning about Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean, but came around after a while.

If I put a copy of Mein Kampf into the toilet would the modern brownshirts sue me for committing a "hate crime"?

re: #54 Angel

re: #47 Krampus

Kinda catchy aint it...not a bad overview either~!

Yes, great overview.

I saw that entire BBC episode, the Journalist caved in the end. He went to prayer with Ahmadinejad.

re: #56 bikermailman

re: #16 Cattt

I wish I had seen it (need to get my new TV hooked up) so I'd know his talking points.

My opinion is that the whole idea of "hate crime" is totally wrong - crime should be dealt with as crime. If intent can be proven and is criminal, then we have laws for that. Inciting riot is ALREADY a crime, without the damn "hate crime." Is that as opposed to a love ya crime? It's just wrong.

Hate is an emotion, and we should not have emotional laws. We're getting into a dangerous area here. We're not anywhere near as bad as the poor Euros, but it's (cliche coming) a slippery slope.

Didja go with the High Def? Enquiring TechnoNerds want to know!

Oh, yes. Now I need the cable people to come in and make it work. :)

O'Reilly likes to think of himself as the sane one in the middle of America, standing against the craziness of the left and the right. He'll accept a weak argument just so he can appear to be the sage one, looking out for our interests. Can't say it's that big of a surprise, either.

Really disturbed here if H&C was planning to ambush Charles.

re: #64 Thanos

This is why I only watch Britt Hume's news analysis show, and the normal nightly news. I even have problems with Hannity at times.

I only trust Britt...told my wife a long time a go.

Billy O is a goober. I watch him less and less as time goes bye. He is more concerned with ratings than any deeply held beliefs.

Jammie: they asked me to be on, but I had plans I couldn't change.

"No Spin Zone" my shiny metal ass!
I began to lose respect for Blovi O'Really when he slammed the SwiftBoat Vets and stood with Kerry.
I make it a habit not to listen to him as often as I can.
That's all I have to say about that.

re: #61 NhaTrang72

O'Reilley is like Beck that they blend a sort of populism with Occasional Conservatism, but BigHead is wrong on Iraq, wrong on the reasons for oil price rises & declines, wrong on this Koran Flush issue, and AWOL on too many important issues

He does Occasional Good, but the price is high

Bill on big oil makes me sick

re: #64 Thanos

I agree, only the Brit Hume is worth watching, especially the panel discussion at the end. I cannot tolerate tabloid coverage of the Sheppard Smith news report. I recommend "The Beltway Boys," which is on Saturday.

re: #68 KSK

If I put a copy of Mein Kampf into the toilet would the modern brownshirts sue me for committing a "hate crime"?

What have you against brownshirts? sarc

The leprechaun is nearly unwatchable. The fair and balanced stance of Fox is equivalent to sitting on a fence pitching poo into two yards. They're afraid of a Hillary presidency and go way out of their way to be on both sides of every issue. I never thought I'd say this, watching CNN is actually less vexing than watching Fox of late. My TV can only take so many shoes being thrown at it. BTW-his radio show is in the toilet along with the Koran, which is a good place for both.

#51 Thanos -

Hate crimes laws are anti-american and anti-freedom -- this sword has two edges, no hilt, and who's more likely to get cut by it?

Exactly. People who desecrate holy books, burn flags etc. deserve to be shunned by society and treated as objects of scorn. They don't deserve to be thrown in prison.

I'm not saying they were going to stage an ambush. I don't know that. I'm saying O'Reilly's show -- their flagship show -- gave me a very bad feeling about it.

re: #74 Charles

Jammie: they asked me to be on, but I had plans I couldn't change.

You mean we missed the chance to see the Lizard Master do his thing in real time? Sad day for the lizard minions.

he's so 'show biz'. not a tuff guy looking out for us. he's a moldy cupcake. (and not that pithy).

re: #69 Krampus

good grief!...Eichmadinjeehad actually prays?..to whom?

re: #74 Charles

Jammie: they asked me to be on, but I had plans I couldn't change.

OK, got it. Thought something happened that I missed.

Avoiding Skeletor is good for your health.

I've long suspected that O'Reilly is a fucking idiot. He just proved it.

re: #36 Charles

Seems to be that kind of night.

Sooo, let me get this right. They believe Koran in toilet = prison time. Hard, hard world we live in.

OT: (but a great vacation idea)

Hamas Shows off Their Islamic Paradise...

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip: Never mind the international isolation, growing poverty and reports of violent retribution against its defeated Fatah rivals. In Hamas' own eyes, its takeover of Gaza has made the coastal strip "safe, clean and green."

In an attempt to get that message across, Hamas took two busloads of foreign journalists on an air conditioned tour of Gaza on Monday — including a stop in a refugee camp where the deposed prime minister waved from his balcony and a prison visit hosted by one of Hamas' most powerful military men.

Hamas officials said they were worried about the negative publicity they've received since taking over Gaza in June

.

Islam is a hate crime. In fact, they have a user's manual. I wonder if that would make a good defense? Hmm.

I hope the writers for Boston Legal are watching this. They tend to be softhead leftards, but they give Shatner some conservative stuff to chew on, too. Be better as The Practice, with Dylan McDermott / Bobby Donnell.

I also talked to a CNN producer today, by the way, for the Paula Zahn show. She seemed much more aware of the issues. (Of course, that's what they want you to think.)

re: #61 NhaTrang72

O'Reilley is like Beck that they blend a sort of populism with Occasional Conservatism, but BigHead is wrong on Iraq, wrong on the reasons for oil price rises & declines, wrong on this Koran Flush issue, and AWOL on too many important issues

He does Occasional Good, but the price is high

Exactly what I was thinking, and stated better than I could have.

I bought both Hannity books...but he changed...he defends Islam too much for my bp..

re: #70 Cattt

I'll be right over...you'll LOVE it!

While I agree with O'Reilly that Kos is a hate site (and the burnt orange color scheme gives me a headache), I think he's attacking them from the wrong angle.

He should be using their anti-semitism to highlight just how vile the Kos site really is. There's plenty of venomous, vitriolic and vulgar anti Israel/anti-semitic stuff over there to work with.

Oh Really? No, O'Reilly. And demure Michelle Malkin completely outclassed him tonight. No worries, as the Aussies say...

Like I said.

Bill talked shit about Mikey Moore, than when push came to shove and he met the man, his balls fell off.
What else do you need to know about the man?

re: #82 Charles

I'm not saying they were going to stage an ambush. I don't
know that. I'm saying O'Reilly's show -- their flagship show -- gave me
a very bad feeling about it.

I could see the O'Reilly minions cherry-picking an "offensive" quote or pulling a Kurtz on you.

re: #85 Angel

re: #69 Krampus

good grief!...Eichmadinjeehad actually prays?..to whom?

I think it was Shimon Peres today who said Eichmadinjeehad prays to The Bomb.

O'Reilly is a textbook case of the fallacy that our "feelings" reflect "truth."
He reacts well enough with outrage at many of the topics that deserve outrage, and when he does (and genuine righteousness is smothered in today's culture) it's a relief and enjoyable to hear calling a spade a spade. HOWEVER, he runs with his feelings on everything, proving that "feelings" can also be wrong. Righteously angry mobs lynch innocent men all the time - they went with their "feelings" rather than intellect - cool down, take stock, gather some more evidence ... O'Reilly goes with his viceral reaction when analysis is required - especially on subjects that he is ill-informed about, which happens too much (especially given he's supposed to have staff to help with that).
Sum: Too irractic to count on, but frequently enough he hits home runs. Frustrating for people who want more consistency.
Extra awful in a case like this.

re: #78 PIERRE_LEGRAND

The Battle for Civilization...pick your partner and dosey doe
Time to stand up America... not to insult Muslims but to defend our First Amendment Rights!

Exactly!

There's FAR TOO MUCH USE of 'feelings' to CONTROL or OBSTRUCT others!

My FEELINGS tell me NOTHING about YOU, but
my FEELINGS tell me MUCH about HOW I SEE you!

Using FEELINGS to manipulate others rewards the Feeling-Monger!

H & C didn't mention the Koran case in the intro. I suspect they canceled their coverage.

re: #91 Charles

Dang Charles..you been hobnobbing with the bigwigs...dang get your own show already!

re: #91 Charles

I also talked to a CNN producer today, by the way, for the Paula Zahn show. She seemed much more aware of the issues. (Of course, that's what they want you to think.)

If Glenn Beck calls, please go :)

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

Can't see Hannity doing an LGF ambush - Colmes, yes, but not Hannity.

I am thinking we need to get Zombie on to do a slide show...

Heads would pop coast to coast.

re: #95 DesertSage

waves frantically* Heh

So in America flushing a Koran is a hate crime.
In Saudi Arabia reading a bible is a capital offense.

"Hate Crimes" are well down the slippery slope to where we do not want to go. Making something that is already illegal 'more illegal' based on what prosecutors determine is the 'intent' behind the crime is nothing more than 'thought crime' . Next you will be prosecuted for 'voting crime' if you are not careful.

Confucius says: Sitting On Fence Post Too Long And Hard Results In You Spitting Woodchips

re: #99 JammieWearingFool

maybe they were just trying to show Kos that they're opposed to left AND right wing blogs. without even realizing that LGF is actually credible.

re: #76 gooddad

re: #61 NhaTrang72

Bill on big oil makes me sick

You too? I think he actually knows better, but does it because he's 'looking out for us'. I have to change the station when he rants on that. Good thing we have a really good local guy at the same time.

#82 Charles
Sorry, Charles, I understand. Just aggravated.

re: #100 itellu3times

Then let's send him one. From a B-52.

Colmbs just brought it up...

re: #103 Charles

H & C didn't mention the Koran case in the intro. I suspect they canceled their coverage.

Next story...

re: #103 Charles

H & C didn't mention the Koran case in the intro. I suspect they canceled their coverage.

skeletor just mentioned it

re: #103 Charles

Nope, it's coming up now.

re: #104 Angel

re: #91 Charles

Dang Charles..you been hobnobbing with the bigwigs...dang get your own show already!

Show, no.

Channel, yes.

Get a LizardCam going a la Rush Limbaugh, and start booking those Budweiser ads.

re: #100 itellu3times

ha prays to da bomb eh...yea that makes sense dude.

Ah, never mind -- they are going to talk about it. I'm trying to do 30 things at once.

H&C are going to debate this shortly.

re: #109 Angel

Hi Angel...*waving back*

re: #103 Charles

Coming up in a minute..commercial break.

H & C have that segment on Stan on after the commercial break

Just thought I'd drop a bit of good news in here...

Prominent hardline Iranian cleric dies at 85

Ayatollah Ali Meshkini, a founding member of Iran's Islamic regime and leader of an assembly that oversees the country's supreme leader, died Monday. He was 85 years old. State television said he died of a lung infection.

The ayatollah was the head of the Assembly of Experts. The 86-member government body can in theory reprimand or even dismiss Iran's supreme leader, a position currently held by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

My attitude toward "hate crimes" has changed. Matthew Shepard and Robert Byrd were the poster cases for these laws. But as can be seen here "hate" becomes what the left and Islamist determine it to be. "Cross in Urine" or "Virgin in Dung" is art. Carving out more "victim" groups where attorneys and activist judges can create new laws is the path to totalitarianism.

Oh my H&C doing the Koran flush case.

I mean the "hate crime" not O'reilly.

Well, it was a hate crime. The only thing that bugs me about this is what is not classified as a hate crime;
...calls to kill Jews,not a crime...support for terrorists abroad,not a crime
...holocaust denial,not a crime
...non-specific calls to kill unbelievers,not a crime
...drawing money from the same people who directly support terrorists,not a crime
...indoctrinating children to hate others, not a crime
... staging deliberate look-a-like hijack situations to desensitize and befuddle law enforcement,not a crime

PUTTING A KORAN IN A TOILET IS ABSOLUTELY A HATE CRIME AND NOTHING ELSE, BUT WHERE IS THE "MEDITATION ROOM" FOR JEHOVAH'S' WITNESSES, MORMONS, SCIENTOLOGISTS, METHODISTS, CHURCH OF THE SUBGENIOUS,BAHA'I, RAHSTAHFARI, ASSEMBLY OF GOD, UNITARIANS, BUDDHISTS, BAPTISTS, AND HINDI?

Brit Hume's show is good, and the discussion at the end is great when Krauthammer is on. Fred and Mort stammer and stutter too much and are wrong about half the time. Maybe Brit and Charles could just spend the last 20 minutes sharing their insights, which are usually in the ten ring. For grins, they could bring Jaun Williams on once a week and beat him up. The rest of Fox sucks.

re: #110 KSK

So in America flushing a Koran is a hate crime.
In Saudi Arabia reading a bible is a capital offense.

so is having a Church or even wearing a yarmulke...go figure .

wonder what they think of St.Pattys Day...maybe we should ask BILL that !~

re: #106 reine.de.tout

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

Can't see Hannity doing an LGF ambush - Colmes, yes, but not Hannity.

Did you see how he treated Walid Shoebat?...talked over him.

re: #101 wanumba

Remember his judgment in the Hornbeck kidnap case?

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

#131

PUTTING A KORAN IN A TOILET IS ABSOLUTELY A HATE CRIME ...

I reject that outright

BO doesn't get much airtime on any TV I watch. IMHO H&C are much better and have a much more consistant view of the world.

Skeletor would ambush his own grandmother if he thought it would make him popular.

There is a thread on Free Republic tonight about how he also slimed them this evening.

re: #136 CrazyJew

As a Christian, no. I do, however, greatly object to being forced to fork over my tax dollars to endore something that offends me so.

Can I watch H&C on line guys?

~ Sung to the Tune of Danny Boy

Oh Billy boy, your snipes, your snipes are appalling
Like Osama Bin, down your ratings slide
The summer's gone, and your dumb to Muslim lying
'tis you, 'tis you must go as The Factor died.

But come you back when Geraldo is in Mexico
Or when your wife's spent all your dough
But we'll still be here in sunshine or in shadow
Oh Billy boy, oh Billy boy, we loathe you so.

A while ago, I wrote O'Reilly off as the; "stopped watch that's right twice a day" but he's really a clock with no hands.

re: #140 DesertSage

Skeletor would ambush his own grandmother if he thought it would make him popular.

I think he's already done that..ha

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

No.

Nor do I want it subsidized by taxpayers or be told I'm close-minded when I condemn it.

Someone wants to do that crap on their own time and own dime, knock yourself out. Just don't expect me to pay for it or condone it.

re: #143 Angel

Can I watch H&C on line guys?

We'll give you the play by play Angel.

Flushing the Koran is not a hate crime.
Quoting from the Koran may qualify as one.

re: #105 Thanos

re: #91 Charles

If Glenn Beck calls, please go :)

second!

Now for some controversy -- we can't agitate against hate crime legistlation if we are not willing to take the results both ways. That would be hypocritical, and just plain wrong. So ... when there are definite hate crimes we need to spell out what distinguishes them. One thing that certainly seems to be a theme in the cases that win is actual violence against person(s) or threats of violence / intimidation.

OT, How many people believe that Clinton had Hume's son killed?
I believe.

Yo go girl!

re: #131 swamprat

You forgot:

Burning the Stars an Stripes=free speech.

#131 swamprat

Well, it was a hate crime

...or a politcal statement.
When your religion IS your politics, what do you expect.

Bridgett Gabriel is taking on the Arab "princesses" issue right now. And, of course, is doing a slam dunk.

O'Reilly can't support Korans in the toilet and also object to the piss Christ and the dung Mary without being totally inconsistent. Not that that's stopped him before, but this would be particularly obvious.

re: #148 DesertSage

re: #143 Angel

Can I watch H&C on line guys?

We'll give you the play by play Angel.

ok got me some popcorn dude...g'head ~!

re: #142 ParanoidPyro

I find myself going back and forth on this issue... I'm asking myself if I would want someone to go to jail if they put a Torah in the toilet... Part of me says yes...

re: #149 KSK

Flushing the Koran is not a hate crime.
Quoting from the Koran may qualify as one.

wow great line!

Windbag. Jerks off looking at himself on TV.

Either that, or sexually harassing subordinates.

re: #36 Charles

I have a feeling Fox News was planning an LGF ambush tonight on H & C.

Was? Did you dissuade them?

re: #148 DesertSage

FWIW, that's the second time recently I posted the exact second as someone else.

re: #156 ciaospirit

Bridgett Gabriel is taking on the Arab "princesses" issue right now. And, of course, is doing a slam dunk.

I give her book away to people asleep.

Doesn't that sleazy Saudi prince Whatisname own a big chunk of Fox? Hasn't he boasted of his informal influence over programming?

It might seem to lefties that Fox is conservative but this is true only within the narrow band of soft-peddling Bush administration positions and policies. This is not inconsistent with kowtowing to the oil ticks, not inconsistent at all.
O'Reilly has gotten something of a pass here because he annoys liberals. It may be time to hold him to account. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" only applies under such dire conditions as a Nazi invasion. We are not there yet. For now we are better off without this conformist wimp in blowhard's clothing when it comes to real issues.

#147 Jammie...

Nor do I want it subsidized by taxpayers or be told I'm close-minded when I condemn it.

Maybe we are missing something here.
Had he got an NEA grant to throw it in the toilet, then everything would be groovy!

Duh! /slaps head

OT...

I understand that the LGF community is sick of Paris Hilton, (as Am I for that matter...) but this is one article that needs to be read...

Paris Hilton to be stripped of inheritance

She is getting nothing...

All of the money (upon Death) will be given to charity...

/ WOW...I did not see THAT coming...seriously

How about organizing a flush-a-thon?

Let's see them arrest 300 people each dumping a koran in a port-a-potty.

Brigette Gabriel for President!

re: #74 Charles

Jammie: they asked me to be on, but I had plans I couldn't change.

Ah, I understand.

She is against the Saudi deal..God bless her.

If they put one of my books in the toilet they should be prosecuted. If they choose to put one of their own books into their own toilet, why should the government get involved?

Shees... another commercial!

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

Absolutely not.

I've always told my friends that people like Paris and Lindsey Lohan(s) of the world are to be pitied. Why? Well my friends it is because of the little things in life...when you earn you keep in life through trade and job, you respect yourself and your hard work keeps you down to earth. I mean I paid my way through my undergrad in my early 20's without taking loans out...semester, by semester. And you know what? I respected my education and (hopefully) gained copious amounts of knowledge from my experiences...but I digress...

Paris and other starlets are to be pitied, cause they have no idea about how the majority of the world operates. If their financial situations, or acting, or music, or whatever, goes down the proverbial crapper then they have nothing to grab on to. You and I (and all other hard working LGF lizards) have skill sets, and rationality to ground us...if I loose my finances, I'll pick myself up and start again. These layabouts in lace have no concept of a hard days work...and now Paris has become the living embodiment of my example. A spastic child of the idle rich, stripped of the item that made her what she was...access to more riches than the kings of all of Old Europe. Now she must cope...and one can only hope (albeit silently for most compassionate people) that she places her life on track and is able to give up her excess lifestyle...

I pity the Britney Spears, and Lindsey Lohans of the world...there star will fall from the Hollywood sky shortly. I may be dirt poor, but I still see hardship in other lives that are not my own.

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

Absolutely not, and I'm going to disagree with Swamprat. Holocaust denial is not a crime, it's lunacy as all denial of reality is, not a crime though.

O'Reilly's a grandstander. Dishonest to the core. Anyone who saw him attack the young man whose father died on 9/11 should know that. Pointless ranting about him years later.

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

No.

But I'm with others that I shouldn't have to pay for it.

I am not hijacking the thread (especially for any thing named Paris...except Paris Texas, that was a good film)...

But I thought the Army should know...

I think people forget all Christians in America were indirectly asked to help fund the "Piss Christ" thanks to our tax contributions to the NEA. When the Muslims get to pay to have somebody flush and crap on a Koran, then maybe I'll sympathize a little more.

I'm still torn on this issue, but I am really encouraged by the lack of hypocrisy here.

Been having some issues with Blogger...

I hardly watch anything on the tube anymore that doesn't involve crab fishing.

Also (and I've said this before) I would never defile a toilet by dropping a Koran in it. Nor would I defile myself by touching a Koran.

/Come on CAIR! Sue me!

re: #159 CrazyJew

re: #142 ParanoidPyro

I find myself going back and forth on this issue... I'm asking myself if I would want someone to go to jail if they put a Torah in the toilet... Part of me says yes...

Then your username fits.

@160 Angel
Thank You!

But rather obvious I believe. Mein Kampf is not a vile book because it speaks about the "greatness of the German people" or whatever.
It's vile because it calls for the mass murder of Jews.
The Koran is not vile because it talks about the greatness of Allah.
It's vile because... well see above.

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

No. Don't do it on the "public's" dime. Burn, flush, destroy YOUR propery at will.

re: #136 CrazyJew
As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

Ditto with Ciao.

What self respecting artist would take money from the government they hate for their art?
Bahh..
Bunch of faux artists.

re: #147 JammieWearingFool

hear,hear!

re: #185 David Simon

:)

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

They are things...God is in heaven...not on a cross.

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

How could one write such a law? Religious symbols are infinite in number. Some religions have hundreds, nay thousands, of holiest sites, etc...

OT:

US court dismisses child slavery case against Dubai ruler

MIAMI: A judge in Miami on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging the ruler of Dubai enslaved thousands of children and forced them to work as camel jockeys, saying the suit fell outside the court’s jurisdiction.

Judge Cecilia Altanoga ruled in favor of the defense, which argued that Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashed al-Maktoum did not have sufficient contacts in Florida to justify trying the suit in the southeastern US state.

“We’ve said from the beginning that this case doesn’t belong in US courts and we’re gratified by Judge Altonaga’s careful legal analysis and ruling,” said Habib Al-Mulla, a spokesman for the Dubai ruler.

The class-action lawsuit filed by parents of child jockeys alleged Sheikh Mohammad, his brother Sheikh Hamdan bin Rashed al-Maktoum and other unnamed defendants kidnapped and enslaved children, in some cases as young as two, to be used on the camel racing circuit.

The plaintiffs argued the two defendants could be tried in Florida because corporations they own do business in that state, but the judge said this ran “contrary to well-settled principles of corporate law”.

“Because the court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over the identified defendants, it does not reach or address the merits of the other arguments raised,” Altanoga said in the ruling.

The defense had argued the interests of former child jockeys are best served through an existing programme to send them back to their home countries and compensate them there.

Sheikh Mohammad is also the vice president and prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, and Hamdan serves as UAE finance and industry minister. afp

I'll always think of this thread when the LLL's rail on about how we all march lock step to Bill's talking points.

re: #168 Maine's Michael

How about organizing a flush-a-thon?

Let's see them arrest 300 people each dumping a koran in a port-a-potty.

And we'll make sure to put it on youtube. Name the time and place!
(I have to say, that I really don't like the idea of damaging ANY books (lifelong bookworm here), and esp holy books, even if they are the Quran. My support for the Grand Flushathon is out of thumbing our collective noses at both the left and the muslims.)

#181 goodbye

When the Muslims get to pay to have somebody flush and crap on a Koran, then maybe I'll sympathize a little more.

I think you just went yard with that shot my friend.

Going, going, its gone...

H&C said CAIR is going after the school (Pace).

God morondotcom

re: #141 MarkX

There is a thread on Free Republic tonight about how he also slimed them this evening.

So he's after the Freepers as well. For his next trick, he will go to a biker bar and kick over some Harleys.

Colmbs is against it as an hate crime!

re: #177 threecoloursblue

If you're thinking of the same chump that showed up on O'Reilly's show a few years ago to criticize the U.S. for "killing" its own citizens, the kid should not have been kicked off the set.

He should have been taken out and head slapped.

O'Reilly has gotten worse since he started his radio show. Like Hannity, he spreads himself too thin. You just can't do four live hours every day and have time to study and prepare - so, you wing it, and O'Reilly ain't a very good winger.

Our #2 conservative radio station here in Northern Virginia, WTNT 570, cancelled O'Reilly a few weeks back. Replaced him with local sports talk for a while. We're hopin' for Mark Davis...

re: #175 Capt_Faust

Beautifully put!

Call me crazy, but I have a somewhat different take on some of O'Reilly's actions.

I don't think that he understands the blogosphere (or the 'net in general) and greatly fears it. Nor do I think that he understands that there are conservative sites as well as LLL swamps.

I think he just generally feels he has to fight back against any momentum coming from the internet, and in this case, since LGF, MM, HA etc were generating buzz, he just had to go the other direction. Survival instinct, perhaps - after all, he IS really just part of the media establishment, and has to see the blogs (all blogs) as threats.

heart attack time.

Colmes sided against calling it a hate crime.

re: #200 mrfocus

God morondotcom

I take that back.

re: #178 ciaospirit

re: #136 CrazyJew As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

No.

But I'm with others that I shouldn't have to pay for it.

DING DING DING DING DING...

My tax dollars fuel enough crap...there is no need for "art" that needs to explore "art"...especially if it is just some sort of artist who gets off bashing Christianity, Judaism, or the US in general, and must create something at taxpayer expense to "educate" the masses...

/ I loathe postmodern art..

re: #176 Thanos

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

Absolutely not, and I'm going to disagree with Swamprat. Holocaust denial is not a crime, it's lunacy as all denial of reality is, not a crime though.

It is in Germany.

Pace banned Obsession?

Colmes said no one has proven CAIR is tied to terrorism.

Wow!

OReilly for CAIR

Colmes against CAIR

re: #186 KSK

It is astounding how even pple with Biblical knowledge compare the level of rage and hate and sexual impropriety of the Old and New Testaments with the Kuuuran.

Have they ever read the Bukkkharis?...pffttt!
Buk–hari (72:715) - A woman came to Muh–ammad and begged her to stop her husband from beating her. Her skin was bruised so badly that she it is described as being “greener” than the green veil she was wearing. Muha–mmad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires.

Bill Oreilly is a dork. Please retire!

#86 JammieWearingFool 7/30/2007 6:14:23 pm PDT reply quote

Avoiding Skeletor is good for your health.

Just the sight of (C)holmes makes me want to commit violent acts.

They are saying CAIR is directly fueling the flames of this.

Why do they use that angled photo of Stas?

re: #214 song_and_dance_man

re: #208 ciaospirit

Colmes sided against calling it a hate crime.

Well raise my left eyebrow.

Laughing.

re: #219 buzzsawmonkey

Hey. I'm "Crazy" , not "Stupid" Jew...

re: #211 bikermailman

re: #176 Thanos

re: #136 CrazyJew

As an aside... Does anyone here think that "Cross in Urine" or Bible in toilet should be outlawed?

Absolutely not, and I'm going to disagree with Swamprat. Holocaust denial is not a crime, it's lunacy as all denial of reality is, not a crime though.

It is in Germany.

Exactly, and we aren't Euroweenies ruled by technocrats yet, this is still America, we are still free.

re: #210 Capt_Faust

/ I loathe postmodern art..

I loathe postmodernism period.

re: #208 ciaospirit

Colmes sided against calling it a hate crime.

This is why Skeletor is my favorite leper liberal. Every once in a while, he applies authentic liberal principles to a problem and (not surprisingly to, say, FDR fans) he comes up with a position opposite the liberal mainstream. He also opposed reviving the fairness doctrine, for instance.

Why is Fox using the term "desecration"?

The "Flying Imams". Wouldn't that make a great name for a band?

LOL

Could O'Reilly have deliberately claimed hate crime to force the left to confront the issue?

Hannity is using talking points from LGF

OMG. I agree with the broad from moveon.org

Somebody shoot me.

    Poor Bill, I thought he had a really brass pair, it's sad to see him squirm and crawl for his masters, and to appease the Kos before his advertizing revenue dries up and blows away.  Tsk.

    I guess it comes down to this: though we're ALL in the same boat, the boat of free speech, and we could lose it, those in the business of 'free' speech (ask Bill's advertizers what its worth) will sometimes sell short in the hopes that they will be allowed to continue their careers.

    And to think we were trying to rally support for him just a few days ago.  What a waste of bandwidth ...

}:(     [Somebody tell me that Limbaugh still has a pair, please!]

re: #229 MacGregor

He ain't that clever.

Any time I find myself agreeing with Skeltor is a terrifying moment...and yet, there it is tonight.

re: #201 Shiplord Kirel

LOL...you are spot on.

Heh...I know of a few ones that would be verrryyy interesting places if that happened...the "games" would be of a different type than rather than the ones normally reserved for those establishments.

re: #212 CrazyJew

Yes.

re: #210 Capt_Faust

I don't want my tax dollars funding ANY art at all. It is just a way to fund things that could never survive in the free market.

The fact that the guy who dumped the Korans is Jewish is important here since O'Reilly's anti-semitic tendencies are well-known.

Allen asks "Is it an act of intolerance" . . .

Damn it Allen, the Koran is a doctrine of intolerance!

What a strange day.

I’d be disappointed, except that I expected it.

Same here.

One has to understand that major media figures are not ready even to admit, in their own minds, the idea that Islam is not a religion of peace, or that the Koran is not a sacred religious document concerned only with God, but rather a political manifesto couched in religious terminology.

That kind of thought is currently taboo, even for most conservatives in the U.S.

Our principles tell us that all religions are equal and should all be protected equally. Therefore, desecrating the Koran is the moral equivalent of painting swastikas on Jewish temples.

I only wonder how many Islamic nukes it will take to amend that popular persuasion.

I love how they call these places "meditation rooms" instead of churches or prayer rooms, since the ACLU has banned them in all public colleges. Yet this same organization seems strangley silent when it comes to banning the muslim religion in public places.

Josh, I guess I should have waited to post on this thread... copied from 2 threads ago at the bottom ... O'Reilly... what an ass.

"O'Reilly is the "Paris Hilton" of conservative talk radio... all fluff no substance... and all full of himself.

Staunch Catholic, arrogant bastard... 60% conservative, 40% liberal."

O'Reilly's take will probably escalate the issue.
Word of advice to toilets across North America: BRACE FOR IMPACT!

Any other South Park fans here that remember the "hate crimes" episode? It was a classic. ("Hate crime laws, a savage hypocracy!")

"It is an act of intolerance" - Colmes

Yo Alan what you and "Liberals" want is an act of INTOLERANCE"

re: #100 itellu3times

re: #85 Angel

re: #69 Krampus

good grief!...Eichmadinjeehad actually prays?..to whom?

I think it was Shimon Peres today who said Eichmadinjeehad prays to The Bomb.

Eichmadinjeehad LOL

My sweet mother (yellow-dog Democrat) flipped out when I told her about this arrest. She said it was time for protests across the nation: get permits for a meeting and a bonfire at town hall, then burn as many Arabic-language Korans as we can get our hands on.

re: #231 Cobra

OMG. I agree with the broad from moveon.org

Somebody shoot me.

It's not MoveOn.org. It's Move America Forward. Exactly opposite.

re: #135 FightingBack

re: #101 wanumba

Remember his judgment in the Hornbeck kidnap case?

Not Me, the fact is that even as a Christian, as deeply offensive as I found p*## Christ, The freedom to make such statements is what freedom of speech is all about.

    We still have that list of advertizers, right?

}:)     [ ... I can be an evil man ... sigh ... ]

Too bad they gave you a bad vibe Charles. You could have really set Colmes straight on CAIR tonight.

re: #241 rtheyserius

It will only take one.

But what a shame we have to wait...sit and wait...for a horrific attack.

re: #241 rtheyserius

This is the pickle we are in today.

Could a GOP Presidential candidate win by leading us out of our funk?

re: #211 bikermailman

Germany is a special case. We all know what happens when one cannot remember the past...

re: #237 screaming_eagle

re: #210 Capt_Faust

I don't want my tax dollars funding ANY art at all. It is just a way to fund things that could never survive in the free market.

Your comment reminds me of the 21 ways to be a good liberal . . .

21 Ways to be a good Democrat

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.

2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Chinese and North Korean communists.

4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical documented changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV's.

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual is natural.

7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.

8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

11. You have to believe that the government "owes" you something, therefore, we need more social programs.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger, Gloria Steinem, and certain liberal movie stars are more important to America than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and The Supreme Court..

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.

16. You have to believe that Hillary Clinton is normal and is a very honest person.

17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.

18. You have to believe conservatives telling the truth belong in jail, but a liar and a sex maniac belonged in the White House.

19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites, and hard core sex, should be constitutionally protected, and displaying the 10 Commandments or the Confederate flag should not.

20. You have to believe that illegal Democratic Party funding by the Chinese Government is somehow in the best interest of the United States.

21. You have to believe that illegal aliens should be left alone because they're here to "make a better life for themselves."

re: #205 bikermailman

Thanks...I guess that momma raised me right.

A testament to her fine teaching when I was a lad...

I think it may constitute a hate crime the way it is defined. Also islam is a hate crime by the way hate crime is defined. I also think it was a desecration of the toilet.

What I'm disappointed about is the lack of attention on the South Koreans still being held by the Taliban - who have killed a second hostage - all while demanding the release of a number of Taliban thugs. Shaming the Taliban into releasing the South Koreans didn't work and military force may not work as the area where they're being kept may be booby trapped to discourage a rescue.

re: #248 Krampus

and what may I ask does Krampus mean?..heh

re: #238 yehoshua

He did offhandedly defend the swastikartists. hmmm.

#204 virginius

You got Mark Levin?

He has a pair the size of cannonballs.

How can you have "hate crimes" without "hate punishments"? As far as I am concerned some criminals have enough hate for others and themselves to go around twice. The criminal code will suffer mightily if this hate crime codification becomes "standard fare. We punish criminals for their actions, as proved period. No one has a "state of mind meter".

I can do any damed thing I want to with a a book I own, a painting I own, or a flag I own. On the other hand I cannot mistreat my wife, my kids my animals, other people etc. Common sense is something that is becoming rare in some laws and law books. I do not think book burning is an acceptable practice for governments but it sure as hell is for individuals who come by a book legally in this country.

Hear that Chomsky?

re: #231 Cobra

OMG. I agree with the broad from moveon.org

Somebody shoot me.

If you're talking about Melanie Morgan she's definitely not from MoveOn.org.

This is Melanie's website [Link: www.moveamericaforward.org...]

Well, I don't know what to say. I usually respect o'reilly's opinion, but this one kind of surprises me.

No where in the law does it say that the desecration of a holy book is considered a hate crime.

Here's a link to the bill.

Someone please read this and tell me where it says the desecration of a holy book fits this bill?

It says a WHOLE LOT about violent acts that cause harm.

(1) The incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem.

(2) Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.

(3) State and local authorities are now and will continue to be responsible for prosecuting the overwhelming majority of violent crimes in the United States, including violent crimes motivated by bias. These authorities can carry out their responsibilities more effectively with greater Federal assistance.

THIS is why I fear the worst with Chief Justice Roberts being down for the count. This is a violation of free speach. If you can burn a flag, you can crap on a bible. Freedom of expression.

O'Reilly has spent too much time in the "bubble*", his claim of "everyman" status is now a fraud. He's an insider with too much to protect to go out on any really dangerous limbs. Pickets and angry letters he can handle, seething and insane killers... no thank you.

*Bernard Goldberg's "media bubble"

O'Reilly is a ratings tool. He'll take a side to provoke debate. I've watched him for years, not that I care what he has to say but who's on the show and what they have to say. If he doesn't like what the guests say, he'll run them off. Tonite, he gave Malkin 'the last word'.

This makes the dems call for a 'fairness doctrine' even more absurd. Unless of course, they need help to disband the Kos kidz.

re: #246 song_and_dance_man

re: #226 Shiplord Kirel

re: #208 ciaospirit

Colmes sided against calling it a hate crime.

This is why Skeletor is my favorite leper liberal. Every once in a while, he applies authentic liberal principles to a problem and (not surprisingly to, say, FDR fans) he comes up with a position opposite the liberal mainstream. He also opposed reviving the fairness doctrine, for instance.

He is also my favorite liberal, along with Susan Estrich. When H&C first started I wrote to Colmes praising his fairness and he actually mentioned it on air to Hannity's chagrin.

Try listening to his radio show once in a while...every looong while. He tones things down for the tv show.

Hannity & Melanie ruled the roost on this one. She even stated that CAIR is trying to head us to Sharia law. Last year, I asked Al-Akhras (Nat'l Vice-Chair-CAIR) in a video interview if he wanted Sharia law for America; he wouldn't answer the question.

re: #249 MandyManners

My sweet mother (yellow-dog Democrat) flipped out when I told her about this arrest. She said it was time for protests across the nation: get permits for a meeting and a bonfire at town hall, then burn as many Arabic-language Korans as we can get our hands on.

Yes, this is an issue that classical Liberals and Conservatives can unite on. That's why it's real important to start lobbying when that federal hate crimes bill gets out of committee.

If Stan loses the initial rounds of his case the only hope will be to take it to Federal level.

re: #253 thebigolddog

Too bad they gave you a bad vibe Charles. You could have really set Colmes straight on CAIR tonight.

I didn't decline the show because of a bad vibe... I declined because I'm right in the middle of some major work on LGF tonight.

re: #237 screaming_eagle

re: #210 Capt_Faust

I don't want my tax dollars funding ANY art at all. It is just a way to fund things that could never survive in the free market.

DING DING DING...could not have said it better myself.

It just seems oh so coincidental that all this "must have" art arises from the dung heap of intellectual thought...and that all the artist have huge agendas to push in their products (that don't sell, unless they "have" to be subsidized).

/ You are wise...a Lizard that other hatchlings need to emulate.

I don't know why O'Reilly bothers with this "Not a Republican, more of a conservative Independent" shtick.

Does he really think he's going to attract liberal viewers?
He ought to realize who it is exactly that's watching each week.
Always seems desperate to come down on the other side of a few token issues, trying to paint himself as not right wing, and in the process he's chosen some pretty strange bedfellows.

O'Reilly is first and foremost a populist which is why he does things like perpetuate "oil company" conspiracy theories. I often have to remind myself however that O'Reilly covers a lot of stories that the rest of the MSM completely ignores and he deserves a lot of credit for that.

re: #203 goodbye_natalie

I thought he turned up to say he didn't want any more killing! Quite a normal reaction for the victims of terrorism.

lawhawk (#260),

What I'm disappointed about is the lack of attention on the South Koreans still being held by the Taliban - who have killed a second hostage - all while demanding the release of a number of Taliban thugs.

Couldn't agree more.

I guess dumping on O'Reilly is just too much fun.

re: #249 MandyManners

My sweet mother (yellow-dog Democrat) flipped out when I told her about this arrest. She said it was time for protests across the nation: get permits for a meeting and a bonfire at town hall, then burn as many Arabic-language Korans as we can get our hands on.

So THAT'S where you get the fire in the belly from!

Hot Air has the video of O'Reilly vs. Malkin...
Video: Should Stanislav Shmulevich face felony hate crimes charges?