LGF

Video: Moonbat Tased at Kerry Speech

Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 9:30:17 am PDT

Here’s another video of that moonbat student who was tased and forcibly ejected from a John F. Kerry speech. (Click the picture to view.)

Toward the conclusion of Kerry’s UF forum, Meyer approached an open microphone at the University Auditorium and demanded Kerry answer his questions. The student claimed that University Police Department officers had already threatened to arrest him, and then proceeded to question Kerry about why he didn’t contest the 2004 presidential election and why there had been no moves to impeach President Bush.

UPDATE at 9/18/07 12:59:49 pm:

This must have been the most videotaped moonbat outburst ever. Here’s another video, showing more of the confrontation before the other edited clips start.

Advertisement

517 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:31:51am

Wow, seriously uncalled for.

Wow.

2 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:31:53am
3 Black George Bush  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:32:21am

The MSM would be hyperventilating if President Bush were tazering people at his speeches.

4 RedDish  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:33:18am

But Charles, Michelle has an update on this. Seems this poor moonbat was mad 'cause he didn't get the time to talk to Mr. Kerry. He rushed the stage. Lucky being tased was all he got.

5 yah  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:33:18am

How come nobody used a taser on code pink protesters at congress last week?

6 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:24am

Statistically, about 10% of the audience was Tased.

7 MandyManners  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:28am

Halp hym, Jon Carry.

8 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:28am

"Don't taser me, Bro'...Aaaahhh!"
I love videos like this, you can just rewind over and over...

9 RedDish  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:29am

Sorry!

Linky: [Link: michellemalkin.com...]

see the update

10 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:33am
11 Thanos  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:34:36am

Reminds me of the time when my son was very young and had a toothache -- tried to give him some children's asprin, but he just kept kicking and screaming "Tastes yucky!" "Tastes Yucky!"

12 PISSED  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:35:33am

I wonder if the cops will be charged with assault and moonbat-tery

/hahhahaha

13 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:35:50am

re: #1 TeamDub

Get all the facts first.

He deserved it.

14 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:36:14am
15 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:36:26am

I don't agree with what this guy did (disrupting a meeting), but I don't approve of the way that the cops handled it.

Tasering should only be used when there is a threat to an employee of the security detail...not when they want someone to do what they want done.

I'm telling you, Lizards: think this one through.

First they tasered moonbats and I said nothing...

Think it through.

~Norsk Troll

/the cops should be charged with assault.

*pulls the pin and throws it in*

Responses?

16 zuckerlilly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:36:38am

Sorry for ot so soon:

Times to Stop Charging for Parts of Its Web Site

The New York Times will stop charging for access to parts of its Web site, effective at midnight Tuesday night.


The move comes two years to the day after The Times began the subscription program, TimesSelect, which has charged $49.95 a year, or $7.95 a month, for online access to the work of its columnists and to the newspaper’s archives. TimesSelect has been free to print subscribers to The Times and to some students and educators.

In addition to opening the entire site to all readers, The Times will also make available its archives from 1987 to the present without charge, as well as those from 1851 to 1922, which are in the public domain. There will be charges for some material from the period 1923 to 1986, and some will be free.

The Times said the project had met expectations, drawing 227,000 paying subscribers — out of 787,000 over all — and generating about $10 million a year in revenue.

“But our projections for growth on that paid subscriber base were low, compared to the growth of online advertising,” said Vivian L. Schiller, senior vice president and general manager of the site, NYTimes.com.

What changed, The Times said, was that many more readers started coming to the site from search engines and links on other sites instead of coming directly to NYTimes.com. These indirect readers, unable to get access to articles behind the pay wall and less likely to pay subscription fees than the more loyal direct users, were seen as opportunities for more page views and increased advertising revenue.

“What wasn’t anticipated was the explosion in how much of our traffic would be generated by Google, by Yahoo and some others,” Ms. Schiller said.

The Times’s site has about 13 million unique visitors each month, according to Nielsen/NetRatings, far more than any other newspaper site. Ms. Schiller would not say how much increased Web traffic the paper expects by eliminating the charges, or how much additional ad revenue the move was expected to generate.

Those who have paid in advance for access to TimesSelect will be reimbursed on a prorated basis.

Colby Atwood, president of Borrell Associates, a media research firm, said that there have always been reasons to question the pay model for news sites, and that doubts have grown along with Web traffic and online ad revenue.

“The business model for advertising revenue, versus subscriber revenue, is so much more attractive,” he said. “The hybrid model has some potential, but in the long run, the advertising side will dominate.”

In addition, he said, The Times has been especially effective at using information it collects about its online readers to aim ads specifically to them, increasing their value to advertisers.

Many readers lamented their loss of access to the work of the 23 news and opinion columnists of The Times — as did some of the columnists themselves. Some of those writers have such ardent followings that even with access restricted, their work often appeared on the lists of the most e-mailed articles.

Experts say that opinion columns are unlikely to generate much ad revenue, but that they can drive a lot of reader traffic to other, more lucrative parts of The Times site, like topic pages devoted to health and technology.

17 goodbye_natalie  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:36:46am

Well, at least one good thing comes of this. The left got a taste what it is like to have America’s Hitler Youth interrupt a political gathering. This kid could have been wearing a Code Pink Shirt.

Doesn’t matter whether it was Kerry or not to me. When time was up, the kid should have shut his mouth and sat down. Once he started resisting, that big black cop should have walked him out the door and administered the black jack to the back of the head.

No need for arrest since the jails are too full already. Just beat the snot out of him. It does wonders for opening the mind to civility.

18 Doug  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:36:54am

Moonbat: "what did I do?"

Reality: "get a clue and grow up, moron."

19 Charles  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:37:10am

re: #4 RedDish

But Charles, Michelle has an update on this. Seems this poor moonbat was mad 'cause he didn't get the time to talk to Mr. Kerry. He rushed the stage. Lucky being tased was all he got.

Watch the video -- he did not rush the stage. He did, however, struggle with the police, which is never a great idea.

20 Durkadurka  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:37:22am

Sometimes a good ol' "wooden shampoo" is the only thing that makes a dent on thck-headed moonbats. I think the police used remarkable restraint when faced with this recalcitrant tantrum thrower.

21 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:37:33am

"Can't we all just get along...whine".

If you fight the police, expect the worse.

22 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:37:51am

PIMF

"...and throws it into the discussion*

~ENT

23 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:37:53am

"Help Me! Help Me! Help Me!"

Suggestion for future reference: Argue the merits of a cop restraining you AFTERWARDS - not during.

24 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:38:03am

John "Lurch" Kerry says can I be next I might perk me up a bit.

25 mean Gene  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:38:08am

So, this guy was to the moonbat left of Kerry.
LOL.
Right on the heels of Kos' site claiming Lamont could have beat Lieberman any other day but election day.

26 Harry Tuttle  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:38:10am

re: #3 Black George Bush

The MSM would be hyperventilating if President Bush were tazering people at his speeches.

I'd pay money to see GWB taze a moonbat.

27 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:38:43am

re: #8 rawmuse

"Don't taser me, Bro'...Aaaahhh!"
I love videos like this, you can just rewind over and over...

"Dont tase me, Bro"

It never enters there head if they stopped acting like a shithead (or didnt act like one in the first place) they wouldn't be getting zapped.

Stupidity should be painful.

28 Eagle  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:39:14am

Wow. This is the third video of this I have seen. At least three cameras caught this.

The longer video shows him, near the end, screaming that "they are going to kill me!" (The Taser didnt seem to relax him too mcuh)

http://video.nbc6.net/player/?id=157250

29 victor_yugo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:39:28am

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

/certainly not Obi-Wan Kenobi

30 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:39:38am

I'm shocked by this behavior! Truly shocked.
/

31 Spiny Norman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:40:13am

Immature, self-absorbed moonbat throws a public tantrum, refuses order to desist, warned not to continue throwing tantrum or he'll be tasered, gets tasered when he keeps thrashing around.

Recipe for protest. Ooh boy.

:^þ

Notice how Lurch kept droning on the whole time? What a dope.

32 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:40:47am

re: #29 victor_yugo

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

"Help me, John Effin' Carry, you're our only hope--" *blip*

/certainly not Obi-Wan Kenobi

ROFLMAO!

33 goodbye_natalie  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:40:52am

re: #29 victor_yugo

LOL...

34 cry_havoc  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:40:55am

It brings a smile to my face to see one barking mad moonbat turn on another barking mad moonbat.

35 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:40:57am

Kragar -

Uncalled for regardless of moonbattery. Do I get some twisted satisfaction seeing (and hearing) that twit get tazered?

Yes.

Was it appropriate?

From what I saw, no.

Pretty simple.

36 RedDish  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:41:30am

Charles,
The video shows cops already standing behind this student. The update on Michelle's blog mentioned that the video started after he rushed the stage. When I checked back at her blog, there was that additional update from the Hopkins grad, so there are two different stories being passed around. Sorry I wasn't clearer.

37 RTLM  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:41:58am

**grin**

38 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:42:00am

re: #6 EC Marm

Statistically, about 10% of the audience was Tased.

The poll said that 1 Billion were tased.

39 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:42:48am

Well, if he rushed the stage then he's lucky a little jolt is all he got.

40 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:42:52am

OT- speaking of moon bats.

Reading The Pictures: Bush Hype And The Loss Of Sheikh

Her is the laugh line.

My question is, did George Bush effectively "off" an ally -- and even undermine his Anbar strategy -- for the sake of the "surge sale" and a single photo-op?

/such nice questions they as a Huffpo.

41 Richard Romano  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:43:04am

The guy was acting like a real jerk -- he deserved it. He is known to them apparently, and he wasn't interested in answers, just acting like an immature prick.

42 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:43:15am
43 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:43:21am

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

Police are fully within their right to tase a suspect when said suspect is in the process of being taken into custody and refuses to do so per their instructions, especially after being warned of the consequences numerous times!

44 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:43:56am

So many moonbats, so few brains.

45 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:43:56am

re: #35 TeamDub

Kragar -

Uncalled for regardless of moonbattery. Do I get some twisted satisfaction seeing (and hearing) that twit get tazered?

Yes.

Was it appropriate?

From what I saw, no.

Pretty simple.

I agree with you, TeamDub.

Do we really want to turn a blind eye to this kind of stuff, Lizards?

What about when Hitlary gets into office next year? If her goons start tazering us when we protest her forcing medical insurance on everyone in America, we won't have any moral ground to stand on.

Be very, very careful, Lizards.

After they are done tazering people you don't like, they may come after you, next, for doing something they didn't like.

~Norsk Troll

46 Thanos  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:03am

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

I don't agree with what this guy did (disrupting a meeting), but I don't approve of the way that the cops handled it.

Tasering should only be used when there is a threat to an employee of the security detail...not when they want someone to do what they want done.

I'm telling you, Lizards: think this one through.


First they tasered moonbats and I said nothing...

Think it through.

~Norsk Troll

/the cops should be charged with assault.

*pulls the pin and throws it in*

Responses?


They were not cops, they were security guards. The person was asked to leave, pulled gently, pushed, shoved, dragged... If he didnt' get it by then he deserved the Tasering.

I'm going to fall back on my days as a bar bouncer -- a drunk patron acting this bad in a bar would receive much worse than a tasering. He's at a public gathering, but the owners and the custodians of the property have the right to use reasonable force to remove unruly people.

47 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:08am

He was tasered in a fashion reminiscent of Jenjis Kahn...

48 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:29am

The KosKidz are going absolutely apeshit over this...but a lot of them fail to understand this individual was resisting arrest.
They claim this is proof of the totalitarian police state we live in...uh maybe when youre on two hits of LSD
But in the real world, when the police ask you to leave and you refuse, and they try to escort you out but you throw a hissy fit and try and wrestle away from them, you are giving them every reason on earth to tase you into submission.

49 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:35am

re: #35 TeamDub


Was it appropriate?

From what I saw, no.

Pretty simple.

The cops tell you to comply and warn you, like various accounts said they did before the various videos and edits started popping, then you shut up and comply. Otherwise, you get what you deserve. He was lucky they use tasers now. Another time it would have been night sticks and submission (choke) holds.

50 tradewind  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:36am

I knew J-effn'-K was just another fascist chimp ...

51 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:44am

re: #26 Harry Tuttle

re: #3 Black George Bush


The MSM would be hyperventilating if President Bush were tazering people at his speeches.

I'd pay money to see GWB taze a moonbat.


great way to raise campaign funds

taser some guy/woman in a hillary, edwards, obama mask. - okay, we might have to leave out obama because that might be called racist.

52 Charles  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:44:52am

re: #36 RedDish

Charles,
The video shows cops already standing behind this student. The update on Michelle's blog mentioned that the video started after he rushed the stage. When I checked back at her blog, there was that additional update from the Hopkins grad, so there are two different stories being passed around. Sorry I wasn't clearer.

That account says he rushed to the microphone as soon as the Q&A started -- not that he rushed the stage.

53 experiencedtraveller  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:03am

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

Look at the police in the video. They consist of undersized women and overweight men. Of course they had to reach for the Taser.

/Just tired of the taxation/the huge local police expense/ and seeing fat cops all the damn time

54 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:04am

re: #47 TeamDub

LOL!

55 Live4Truth  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:18am

I hate to admit it, but I enjoyed that. The good guys won.

Aside from that, notice how those two cops (or maybe they were just security guards) who first attempted to restrain the guy where completely ineffective? He could wiggle away from both of them, even when one cop had some sort of arm-hold on him. It wasn't until the really big cop stepped in, that the guy was taken down. And even then, it took a long time for a group of about five cops to get cuffs on him and taze him in order to be able to take him away. So my question: was the guy on drugs, or were the cops/guards just not very good at it?

56 Black George Bush  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:29am

"Dont tase me, Bro"

Perhaps a new rotating title Charles?

57 Get busy livin'  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:45am

"May I suggest using your nightsticks, officers?"

/Billy Ray Valentine

58 Killgore Trout  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:45:58am

re: #9 RedDish

He even has his own webpage: [Link: www.theandrewmeyer.com...]

What a loon.

59 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:02am

re: #43 wolverine20

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

Police are fully within their right to taze a suspect when said suspect is in the process of being taken into custody and refuses to do so per their instructions, especially after being warned of the consequences numerous times!

And you're good with that, Wolverine?

Torturing people with electricity that don't comply with orders, even after 6 guys are on top of him?

/just askin'...

~ENT

60 opnion  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:08am

he might not have had it coming but what a jerk!

61 RedDish  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:15am

re: #52 Charles

You're right, my bad. But he had the "cops in pursuit", so there was something going on. They must've had a reason to be worried about this guy.

62 chinesearithmetic  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:35am

The whole world's watching, bro!

63 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:37am

re: #52 Charles

he rushed the mic and refused to stop asking questions, he was attempting to turn Kerrys speech into his own personal Q&A.

64 Charles  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:43am

I love how he calls the black cop "bro."

"Don't tase me, Homey G!"

65 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:46am
66 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:49am

re: #52 Charles

The mics are right in front of the stage, no?

67 RTLM  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:53am

It continues outside the lecture hall.

Full on Drama Bat

68 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:46:55am
That account says he rushed to the microphone as soon as the Q&A started -- not that he rushed the stage.

If that's truly the case, then, despite my schadenfreude, it was inappropriate and *I* would have resisted too. I wouldn't have screamed like a 12 year old girl, but I WOULD have resisted.

As Norsk said, be very careful here - goose, gander and all that.

69 goodbye_natalie  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:47:24am

I would pay money to see Helen Thomas tasered from the stage at one of those Washington Press gatherings and while she was still quivering thrown out the door by big burly men.

70 3 wood  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:47:46am

Any time you get physical with a cop, tasing is an option.

I know cops with bad knees, backs, etc., because some goof decided to get physical some years ago before tasers were around. Some of these injuries are very serious and result in a line-of-duty disabilty for life.

I have no problem with this guy getting tased. Any time a police officer tells you to cool it, the response should be yes Sir and immediately comply.

71 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:47:52am

re: #58 Killgore Trout


Don't tell me it was THE Andrew Meyer!

72 Killgore Trout  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:48:29am

I think he's lucky he wasn't shot. You can't freak out like that around politicians. If there had been secret service protection this could have had tragic consequences.

73 davidwb  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:48:34am

Watching this, I could help but think of an annoying kid in a supermarket, "I want a ring pop, I want a snickers bar!" The progression is complete.

74 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:48:37am
75 Cap'n DOC  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:48:55am

re: #12 PISSED

I wonder if the cops will be charged with assault and moonbat-tery

/hahhahaha

I wonder if the cops will be charged with assault and moonbat-tasery.

Another in the myriad of possible 'offenses'.

76 Ezekiel2517  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:49:03am

Ron Paul was tased.

77 Charles  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:49:27am

I have no problem with the tasing, either, by the way. He clearly asked for it.

But I don't see any evidence he rushed the stage, or acted in a threatening way toward Kerry. (Except in the sense that any crazy person is unpredictable.)

78 Spiny Norman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:01am

re: #72 Killgore Trout

I think he's lucky he wasn't shot. You can't freak out like that around politicians. If there had been secret service protection this could have had tragic consequences.

If Jon Cary had been on a presidential campaign event, I suspect you may be right.

79 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:17am

re: #77 Charles

I have no problem with the tasing, either, by the way. He clearly asked for it.

But I don't see any evidence he rushed the stage, or acted in a threatening way toward Kerry. (Except in the sense that any crazy person is unpredictable.)

Yep you never know what crazy Kerry will do.

80 arf  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:24am

Were any Purple Hearts awarded?

81 formercorpsman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:30am

re: #3 Black George Bush

The MSM would be hyperventilating if President Bush were tazering people at his speeches.

Could you imagine?

82 RTLM  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:34am

Cops: "Inciting a Riot"

83 Cap'n DOC  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:47am

re: #71 jamgarr

Who the hell is THE Andrew Mayer for those of us who are MSM deprived?

84 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:49am
THIS WILL NOT END WELL, LIZARDS~!


THIS WILL NOT END WELL, LIZARDS~!


THIS WILL NOT END WELL, LIZARDS~!


THIS WILL NOT END WELL, LIZARDS~!


THIS WILL NOT END WELL, LIZARDS~!

NO~!
NO~!

NO! Don't taze me, Charles!

*zap*
*zzzappp*


AAHHHGGGHHH~!

Eh...guess I did deserve that.

Still...I encourage everyone to think this over a little and...

*ZZZzzzaaappp*

Okay!, Okay!

I'm going, Charles. I'm going, already!

85 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:50:52am

Forgive me if this has already been discussed, but I've only scanned the comments here, but according to Chrarles' link:

Toward the conclusion of Kerry's UF forum, Meyer approached an open microphone at the University Auditorium and demanded Kerry answer his questions. The student claimed that University Police Department officers had already threatened to arrest him, and then proceeded to question Kerry about why he didn't contest the 2004 presidential election and why there had been no moves to impeach President Bush.

A minute or so into what became a combative diatribe, Meyer's microphone was turned off and officers began trying to physically remove him from the auditorium. Meyer flailed his arms, yelling as police tried to restrain him.

Thus it would appear that the student actually started asking questions of Kerry, which quickly turned into an indecipherable rant, while the time for questions was still open; in other words, he didn't "rush" the mike after time was up.
So I'm a little confused (I know, so what's new):
Was this person "tased" and hauled off
a) because time ran out while he was rantingcommenting? or
b) because of what he was, however inarticulately, trying to say?
In other words, was this guy's freedom of speech "tasered" because time ran out or
because someone - probably one of Kerry's aides, didn't like what he was saying?

86 opnion  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:00am

This kid wrote Sports for the school newspaper & by one account was always a publicity whore.
He will probably get interviewed on the Today Show.
And somehow , in some mysterious way it will all be the fault if the
Criminal Bush.

87 JammieWearingFool  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:08am

You can hear Lerch droning on in the background. Is there any video to see whether his almost-lifelike expression even changed with this KosKid went crazy?

88 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:12am
89 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:22am

re: #80 arf

Were any Purple Hearts awarded?

Yes but the were someone else's and were immediately thrown off the stage.

90 jcbunga  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:26am

Wait a sec, is this the same John F. Kerry who went to Vietnam? When there was, like, a war going on there?

We can't have our veterans abused in this manner. Doesn't the moonbat know he risked sparking a flashback reminiscent to the tasers used by Genghis Khan?

91 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:41am

re: #80 arf

Were any Purple Hearts awarded?

Heh.

92 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:42am

Maybe he should have been Swiftbooted instead of tazed.

93 rexfromars  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:51:56am

hahahahahaha! Awesome! What a jerk!

94 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:52:15am

Check out the first comment:

I attended the speech this afternoon. The police in this situation clearly acted above and beyond the line of duty. After all, this was a town forum. They even broke the stun gun out in the middle of the auditorium while students set in their seats screaming to stop! This is an outrage and personally I feel it is a violation of Andrews rights of free speech. He simply asked Mr. Kerry why he conceded so quickly in the 04' election to Bush after proof of voter fraud. Remmeber the margin was roughly 50k votes, and if it were true that they both belonged to the Secret Society Bones & Skulls at Yale. It's an outrage that such an event would take place on a college campus, the GPDP should be ashamed!

Cluelessness with blinkers on. What a lovely combination.

95 phoenixgirl  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:52:28am

re: #68 TeamDub

That account says he rushed to the microphone as soon as the Q&A started -- not that he rushed the stage.

If that's truly the case, then, despite my schadenfreude, it was inappropriate and *I* would have resisted too. I wouldn't have screamed like a 12 year old girl, but I WOULD have resisted.

As Norsk said, be very careful here - goose, gander and all that.

and when you resist the law, whether you were right or wrong, you will walk or crawl away injured. it's a very simple concept.

96 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:52:33am
97 pat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:52:37am

OT
Muslim dentists in London force NHS patients into burqua as a condition of dental care.
[Link: www.dailymail.co.uk...]

98 Cap'n DOC  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:00am

re: #92 jamgarr

LOL. That was swift, I tell ya - and nuanced as well.

99 JimmyTheClaw  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:18am

someone needs to dub over the cops so they say respect my autharitah
rofl

100 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:29am

re: #70 3 wood

Any time you get physical with a cop, tasing is an option.

I know cops with bad knees, backs, etc., because some goof decided to get physical some years ago before tasers were around. Some of these injuries are very serious and result in a line-of-duty disabilty for life.

I have no problem with this guy getting tased. Any time a police officer tells you to cool it, the response should be yes Sir and immediately comply.

Well...and I agree with that, wood.

Funny thing: everytime a cop has told me to do something, I've done it.

...AND I'VE NEVER BEEN TAZED IN MY LIFE~!

However, this wasn't a cop. It was security people.

And it wasn't one security guy, it was 6 security guys.

~Norsk Troll

101 lawhawk  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:30am

Michelle Malkin has a whole boatload more on this story. The guy who got tasered pushed and shoved his way to the microphone, and then launched into a diatribe/question of Kerry.

Kerry apparently did try to keep things calm, but one has to wonder why he had to be tased. Was he that uncontrollable that tasing was necessary?

Ace wonders about a double standard - and points out that there's a Dkos entry on the incident... with a poll showing 83% finding the cops out of line.

102 phoenixgirl  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:31am

re: #77 Charles

I have no problem with the tasing, either, by the way. He clearly asked for it.

But I don't see any evidence he rushed the stage, or acted in a threatening way toward Kerry. (Except in the sense that any crazy person is unpredictable.)


/no he begged not to be tased but his actions demanded the tasing!

103 Whale Watcher  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:36am

His mother should have taught him some manners. Don't want to be tased? Then behave yourself in public and respect your elders and superiors.

If he were my kid, I would taser him twice more when he came home.

104 lefty201  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:45am

perhaps we could start doing this to Trolls?


niceLass: Don't taze me! Don't TAZE me! zzzrrrack OW!

post deleted

105 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:46am

re: #90 jcbunga

Wait a sec, is this the same John F. Kerry who went to Vietnam?

Whoa, whoa whoa... John Kerry served in Vietnam?

First I've heard of it.

106 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:50am

re: #89 rab3

re: #80 arf


Were any Purple Hearts awarded?

Yes but the were someone else's and were immediately thrown off the stage.

Just the ribbons were thrown off the stage

107 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:53:52am

John Kerry missed a chance to deliver his trademark coup de grace, once the assailant was down.

/since half a dozen totally ripped cops were having such difficulty

108 JammieWearingFool  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:54:17am

From one of Malkin's updates:

Update 10:00am Eastern 9/18. Andrew Meyer’s milking his 15 minutes of fame. Check out his email address: “famouswriterman@aol.com.”

He doth think highly of himself.

Now he has the fame he so desperately seeks.

What will he do to top it?

109 RedDish  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:54:49am

re: #73 davidwb

HaHa. Saw one in the store this am. Threw, THREW a large toy car at mom because she wouldn't get the sugar frosted sugar bomb cereal or something. Mom showed great restraint with child.

110 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:01am

re: #59 EtNorskTroll

Yeah, I am fine with that. Once he was being taken into custody and told so he has no choice but to comply, which he continually refused to do. He might have been surrounded by numerous guards/cops, but he would not comply with their requests to put his hands behind his back, which is their only way to ensure the saftey of themselves, others in the room, as well as the individual himself. He had already demonstrated that he was willing to physically resist when standing.

His right to challenge the arrest/custody was something that happens after the fact, not during.

111 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:11am

re: #85 realwest
He was tazed for resisting the cops. It is always best not to be a pain in the ass when cops are trying to remove you from a situation. If you feel you were in the right and the cops were in the wrong for trying to remove you, take it up at a later time. Not during the incident, it will only escalate the situation. Why Rodney King 'excessive' arrest went down. He wouldn't obey the cops and kept fighting them.

112 victor_yugo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:13am

This moron got a teensy weensy taste of life under Saddam and the Taliban, Castro and Lil' Kim, and whatever other tinpot dick-taters he supports. Fortunately for him, he survived.

Am I okay with that?

Damn right I am.

113 Iron Fist[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:21am
114 pat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:25am

3 purple hearts and you get to leave the Moonbat Wars

115 Killgore Trout  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:28am

re: #97 pat

Omer Butt is said to have told the patient that unless she wore a headscarf she would have to find another practice.

Dr. Omer Butt.
/heh

116 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:43am

This calls for a 'Summer Soldier Investigation"
/kos

117 goodbye_natalie  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:50am

Call me un-American but in my book "freedom of speech" does not give one the right to disrupt an entire audience of people. If we don't put a stop to the shenanigans, this willl become the norm and I'm not sure it is not already the norm at many college campuses.

You can peacefully protest outside the halls of the auditorium by handing out pamphlets, holding signs, or beating your drum.

But I have never bought into the theory that one individual's rights supersede the rights of an entire crowd.

Personally, I have holstered the taser and brained him, dragging him out by his feet.

118 defender  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:55:53am

A presumed liberal (the arrested) was confronting a confirmed liberal (Kerry) about not trying to steel the election.

Could it be a sign of the cognitive dissonance across liberal philosophy, policy and thinking patterns?

119 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:56:28am

This is like any episode of cops
the perp always screams OOWWW youre hurting me
well then stop resisting
but no...the perp continues to struggle, all the while screaming that he is being hurt
if you dont want the cops to hurt you, dont struggle
its as simple as that

120 xtraBilly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:56:29am

If he had only waited for a John Edwards' appearance he would have had an ambulance chasing lawyer there to press a law suit.

121 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:56:31am

re: #104 lefty201

perhaps we could start doing this to Trolls?


niceLass: Don't taze me! Don't TAZE me! zzzrrrack OW!

post deleted

Hmmm

*Norsk does his best Marge Simpson impersonation*

I don't like the sound of that idea...!

~Et Norsk Troll

122 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:56:49am

re: #97 pat

OT
Muslim dentists in London force NHS patients into burqua as a condition of dental care.
[Link: www.dailymail.co.uk...]

But but buttt butt . Will they pull his license.

Socialized medicine.
Sharia-ized medicine.

123 bulwrk  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:56:50am

He was tasered because the Democratic Party knows what it's base is capable of and it scares the crap out of them.

124 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:57:02am

re: #95 phoenixgirl

and when you resist the law, whether you were right or wrong, you will walk or crawl away injured. it's a very simple concept.

Well, then I guess we have different views on protecting personal freedoms. If I feel I'm being unlawfully detained or arrested, I will most certainly do what I feel I need to whether it will help or not and I will accept the consequences. I have an aversion to heavy-handed authority, perhaps you're more amenable to the idea.

125 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:57:47am

and the guy didnt rush the stage or try to do anything to Kerry
he tried to take over the Q&A and refused to stop talking when asked
he continued to blab his moonbat questions
people started to get tired of it and asked the cops to intervene and remove the individual when he refused to stop talking

126 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:19am

re: #109 RedDish

re: #73 davidwb

HaHa. Saw one in the store this am. Threw, THREW a large toy car at mom because she wouldn't get the sugar frosted sugar bomb cereal or something. Mom showed great restraint with child.

Reason number three to shop for groceries at 1 am.

127 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:19am

re: #64 Charles ROFL!

128 lefty201  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:31am

re: #125 Sizzlack

and the guy didnt rush the stage or try to do anything to Kerry
he tried to take over the Q&A and refused to stop talking when asked
he continued to blab his moonbat questions
people started to get tired of it and asked the cops to intervene and remove the individual when he refused to stop talking

Isn't that any and all moonbats?

129 PaulKo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:34am

That wussy was whining like a little girl. I am concerned about our future in general if these are the types of entitled weenies our universities are churning out. Take the taser like a man and stop your cryin'. This guy certainly would not give KSM a run for his money under the waterboard!

130 JammieWearingFool  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:55am

He's the new Rodney King, bro!

Consider the trouble the cops had handling this nut and think back to the King incident, another one conveniently edited, btw.

King had ingested enough PCP and LSD to drop your average Troofer and gave the cops all they could handle.

He went on to reap millions and rack up countless more arrests.

This punk probably has a battery of lawyers lined up.

131 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:58:56am

re: #77 Charles

His rushing the stage/mics precedes the questioning show in the video. This video doesn't even captur ehis previous two questions to Kerry. From what I've read, there aren't any videos that show his actions that started all this when they tried to end the Q&A session before the idiot got his chance in line.

132 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:16am

re: #115 Killgore Trout

re: #97 pat


Omer Butt is said to have told the patient that unless she wore a headscarf she would have to find another practice.

Dr. Omer Butt.
/heh


you said "butt"

133 Killgore Trout  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:23am

re: #97 pat
Halitosis ain't nothin' when you have Butt in your mouth.

134 Just_A_Grunt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:37am

The best part, he is a journalism student. Looks like Dick Gregory's replacement at ABC is secured.

135 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:37am
136 zandtar  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:43am

The same ones criticizing the police for detaining someone not responding to their orders, would be the same ones complaining about the police if they hadn't stopped him, and he had managed to rush Kerry and do something harmful.

137 AW  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:55am

This is what an offline troll looks like.

It's almost like one of those comedy videos where people act as though they're chatting online.

138 Frank Veracity  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:59:59am

I think the moonbat got what he deserved. However, I'm shocked, shocked I say, that Kerry, the SMP (Senior Moonbat Present), didn't stop his drone and instruct the police to allow the good citizen to continue to speak.

After all, hasn't Kerry said that everyone's voice must be heard and everyone's vote must be counted?

Also, was that applause I heard when the police were wrestling with the moonbat? How can that be? Doesn't to the moonbat left insist the 1st Amendment doesn't just give freedom of speech, it also gives freedom to be heard?

139 DeafDog  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:01am

[Link: www.audiosparx.com...]

Help! Help! I'm being repressed! Bloody peasant!

140 filetandrelease  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:08am

From the single video I saw, it seemed the police came forward too soon. Being a jerk isn't illegal. That being said, once he began throwing a tantrum and resisting, the taser seemed justified.

Either way, he is clearly an idiot.

141 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:42am

re: #94 Geepers Hi Ya Geepers! 50k? I thought it was more like 4,000,00 - no?!

142 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:43am

re: #130 JammieWearingFool

He's the new Rodney King, bro!

Consider the trouble the cops had handling this nut and think back to the King incident, another one conveniently edited, btw.

King had ingested enough PCP and LSD to drop your average Troofer and gave the cops all they could handle.

He went on to reap millions and rack up countless more arrests.

This punk probably has a battery of lawyers lined up.

This just in.
John Kerry testifies in court case entire audience falls asleep.

143 Eowyn2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:46am

Is that guy really wearing white pants?

144 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:00:53am

They could have tasered him before he resisted.

/Because he might have resisted if they didn't

145 victor_yugo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:02am

But notice, did any other moonbats in the audience help take the guy down? Or did they just sit back and let the Powers That Be deal with it?

A huge difference between Them and Us.

146 Eagle  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:06am

BTW,

TASER ===

Thomas
A
Swift
Electric
Rifle

And now you know.

147 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:17am

The police had to act, the guy was about to reveal Jon Carry's ties to Skull and Bones, the secret society of the Bushies, and prove the 2004 elections were all a sham.

148 Black George Bush  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:27am

re: #84 EtNorskTroll

NO! Don't taze me, Charles!

Ahhhahaha! LMAO!

149 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:41am

re: #88 song_and_dance_man

Just released close-up of his face as he was being tasered.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA~!

Ahhh...I haven't laughed that much in the morning for a good long while, S&D man.

Thanks for that.

~Norsk Troll

150 stranded conservative  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:01:55am

This was a very surreal, odd scene on several levels. This big strapping young man in his late teens/early 20s is yelling like a six year old having a tantrum. He seems to have no sense of dignity. Moreover, he expresses not just outrage but is yelling for help. From whom? The audience, J. F. Kerry, teachers? Meanwhile, except for a couple of girls screaming, "Why are you doing this?" The audience just sits there, passive. They seem to have no interest in this scenario. If they ignore what's going on, maybe it's not real? Kerry keeps talking the whole time while this guy is yelling and being tasered. Weirdest thing I've ever seen.

I agree about the undersized women, oversized men comment. There are five or six officers and they can't handle one guy who isn't even punching, kicking or biting, he's just trying to get away. My cousin (a Tallahassee cop) could have handled him all by himself, I've seen him in action. That many cops and they couldn't just pick him up and carry him outside the venue to handcuff at their leisure?

I think the tasering was totally unnecessary and unfortunate because now this guy will be making the rounds of the news shows talking about his trauma, when he should have learned a very different lesson from this experience.

The reaction of the audience was definitely the strangest. I am not suggesting that the students should have rushed the cops by any means but 99% appeared completely detached from any reaction whatsoever. Just weird.

151 Defender  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:02:52am

re: #118 defender

Oops.

That would be "steal the election."

Charles, when will you deploy the grammar checker? We are sooo... spoiled.

152 formercorpsman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:03:05am

re: #69 goodbye_natalie

Oh man, I had to snort it back up after reading that.

You are a just a little twisted.

That got me.

153 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:03:12am

"Hep' Me, Hep' Me, Hep' Me Oprah Winnifree!"

154 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:03:29am

re: #140 filetandrelease

Either way, he is clearly an idiot.

re: #150 stranded conservative

This was a very surreal, odd scene on several levels. This big strapping young man in his late teens/early 20s is yelling like a six year old having a tantrum. He seems to have no sense of dignity. Moreover, he expresses not just outrage but is yelling for help. From whom? The audience, J. F. Kerry, teachers? Meanwhile, except for a couple of girls screaming, "Why are you doing this?" The audience just sits there, passive. They seem to have no interest in this scenario. If they ignore what's going on, maybe it's not real? Kerry keeps talking the whole time while this guy is yelling and being tasered. Weirdest thing I've ever seen.

I agree about the undersized women, oversized men comment. There are five or six officers and they can't handle one guy who isn't even punching, kicking or biting, he's just trying to get away. My cousin (a Tallahassee cop) could have handled him all by himself, I've seen him in action. That many cops and they couldn't just pick him up and carry him outside the venue to handcuff at their leisure?

I think the tasering was totally unnecessary and unfortunate because now this guy will be making the rounds of the news shows talking about his trauma, when he should have learned a very different lesson from this experience.

The reaction of the audience was definitely the strangest. I am not suggesting that the students should have rushed the cops by any means but 99% appeared completely detached from any reaction whatsoever. Just weird.

Well put, about sums it up for me.

155 christheprofessor  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:03:40am

I understand tasered moonbat is quite gamey...

156 Abu Bin Squid  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:03:58am

The audience member was preliminarily identified by UF officials as Andrew Meyer, a UF student in the College of Journalism and Communications.

Let's wait and see just how long it is before "Tazer Boy" is on MSLSD, or CNN, or working for the DNC.

157 ScrewTapeSaysHi  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:04:23am

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

The police/security response seemed excessive, all things considered. I have to admit we should be worried when someone is arrested for being a little kooky and impolite when addressing a politician in a public forum.

158 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:04:32am

re: #135 buzzsawmonkey


I think you give J-school much too much credit for educating their students in government and current events.


J-School ranks right up there with Radio/Television/Film and Parks & Recreation Management as blow-off party majors.

159 kellino  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:04:35am

Sorry for the off-topic post but I had to vent about this article:

Abizaid: World could abide nuclear Iran

John Abizaid, the retired Army general who headed Central Command for nearly four years, said he was confident that if Iran gained nuclear arms, the United States could deter it from using them.

There is a couple problems with this. One is that the whole idea of deterrence requires rational thought. Ahmadinejad seems to subscribe to the end-times theology of the 12th imam, where he can bring about a messianic return by establishing themselves as the center of Islam and destroying Islam's enemies (USA, Israel, etc.)

Look at Iran's involvment with Hamas, Hezbollah and the proxy war in Iraq. Could Iran hand off the weapons and claim plausible deniability? Look at Syria's "secret" nuclear base that was recently revealed.

Also keep in mind that Iran a few years ago tested the remote detonation of a missle over the Caspian sea. There are only 2 plausible reasons for such a feature. One is to abort a launched missle attack. The other is as an EMP weapon which in theory could wipe out most electronic curcuits in North America (read this for details)

In summary, the idea that is would be possible to deter Iran from using nukes strikes me as dangerously naive about the nature of the person who would have his finger on the reb button.

160 DeafDog  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:04:49am

re: #156 Abu Bin Squid

The audience member was preliminarily identified by UF officials as Andrew Meyer, a UF student in the College of Journalism and Communications.

Let's wait and see just how long it is before "Tazer Boy" is on MSLSD, or CNN, or working for the DNC.

Does he go by the name, "Scott Thomas"

161 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:05:29am

re: #157 ScrewTapeSaysHi

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

The police/security response seemed excessive, all things considered. I have to admit we should be worried when someone is arrested for being a little kooky and impolite when addressing a politician in a public forum.

That's my concern as well.

Slippery slope.

162 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:05:30am

re: #155 christheprofessor


I understand tasered moonbat is quite gamey...

But at least you don't have to pick out the buckshot.

163 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:05:38am

re: #111 newsjunkie_ky Um, I know he was tazed
(tased?!) for resisiting the security guards, but I think it better not to bring the Rodney King case into this ya know?

164 Darwin Akbar  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:05:58am

Here in Florida, the police are very quick to taser people...it makes the papers all the time.

Frankly, as one who watched the Chicago Democrat convention on tv in 1968, I'd say this guy got off easy.

Considering that mootbat anger is already at record level on the Seethe-O-Meter, just imagine how insane they will act at the GOP convention next summer or at any GOP campaign stop. By using this as a lever, I predict that the KozKidz and their MSM allies will turn this against police for engaging in "strong-arm tactics," meaning that moonbats will be allowed to disrupt and scream at will.

165 Abu Bin Squid  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:05:59am

re: #160 DeafDog

re: #156 Abu Bin Squid


The audience member was preliminarily identified by UF officials as Andrew Meyer, a UF student in the College of Journalism and Communications.

Let's wait and see just how long it is before "Tazer Boy" is on MSLSD, or CNN, or working for the DNC.


Does he go by the name, "Scott Thomas"

If the money is good he'll go by any name you want.

166 JimmyTheClaw  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:06:14am

better yet

help i'm being repressed

actually this is amusing watching the left eat itself. love the skull and bones question. my only problem is the not using of tasers when leftists rush the stage or get disruptive when anyone to the right of gore speak at colleges

167 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:06:16am

re: #157 ScrewTapeSaysHi

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

The police/security response seemed excessive, all things considered. I have to admit we should be worried when someone is arrested for being a little kooky and impolite when addressing a politician in a public forum.

I am loathe to give government power, Screwtape...for this very reason.

~ENT

168 phoenixgirl  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:06:27am

re: #124 TeamDub

re: #95 phoenixgirl

and when you resist the law, whether you were right or wrong, you will walk or crawl away injured. it's a very simple concept.

Well, then I guess we have different views on protecting personal freedoms. If I feel I'm being unlawfully detained or arrested, I will most certainly do what I feel I need to whether it will help or not and I will accept the consequences. I have an aversion to heavy-handed authority, perhaps you're more amenable to the idea.


the guy was asked to leave and started screaming...he resisted the security/campus police and ignored their requests. he had the option to comply and leave and talk about it outside calmly but he chose to make a scene and scream and draw attention to himself like a spoiled child. in my house i give the order once, after that it's non compliance and there are consequences. i'm sure this guy acts this way in class with his professors, i'm sure his parents saw him act this way at home, and i'm sure he acted like this on the field or court when a call didn't go his way.

169 bulwrk  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:06:46am

On some level you have to give the guy props for being the only one able to stay awake through a Kerry speech.

170 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:06:46am

re: #155 christheprofessor

I understand tasered moonbat is quite gamey...

Not if prepared properly. Forget the 50,000 volt Taser, use the new 1.2 million* volt Taser and they come out quite crispy.

* according to poll results

171 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:16am

re: #166 JimmyTheClaw


help i'm being repressed

See the violence inherent in the system!

172 Cap'n DOC  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:19am

re: #107 rappmandu

I prefer to use the term Counting Coup.

St. JFK shoulda jumped off the stage and touched this guy with his MagicHat. I'm sure that would have mafe everything all better. Or... an alternative ending would involve St. JFK applying a BandAid to the Taser wounds.

173 Adam from Northern Exposure  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:21am

This guy reminds me of my 7 year old son that yells twice as loud over the smallest things just to get his siblings in trouble. I would have liked to see Andy Sipowicz handle the fool.

174 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:28am

And for the record, I've been tased and shot with the 2-probe taser gun and, while not exactly pleasant, shouldn't cause infantile screeching.

(cop friends + alcohol = some bad decisions)

175 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:32am

re: #1 TeamDub

Wow, seriously uncalled for.

Wow.

What? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

176 lefty201  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:07:45am

re: #169 bulwrk


must have been why noone came to his aid

177 christheprofessor  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:08:07am

re: #162 jamgarr

re: #155 christheprofessor


I understand tasered moonbat is quite gamey...

But at least you don't have to pick out the buckshot.

True, but it's got that "electrical fire" taste...

178 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:08:41am

The TRULY funny thing about this whole incident is that Aluminum foil shirts and hats REALLY WOULD have saved these guys~!

A lot of people don't know this, but the TAZE units are impervious to people wearing chain mail or tin foil under their garments.

Shorts out the probes.

Funny, huh?

This guy really might have been protected if he had simply worn some tin foil...

heh.
~ENT

179 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:08:48am
180 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:08:54am

re: #125 Sizzlack

Actually reports are that they were going to remove him from the room immediately when he rushed the stage/mics, but JK intervened and told them to let him ask his Q(s). Based upon his less than rationale approach, the guards/cops stayed at his side. It is a very good thing that SS agents were not present (as well they shouldn't have been), because he never would have even gotten to the mic!

181 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:14am

Did they taser CODE PINK during the Petraeus testimony? I hear one or more of the shriekers resisted arrest.

182 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:28am
183 xtraBilly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:40am

Kerry, of course, should have negotiated a peace agreement between the student and police. As he'd tell you we have to be smart about unprovoked attacks and excessive use of force. No WMDs were found . It would have been better to get all the parties to sit down with the regional powers, the Euros, and the UN. A little bit more nuance and less juice was called for.

184 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:49am

re: #175 Hard Right

What? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.

185 phoenixgirl  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:51am

re: #178 EtNorskTroll

omg that is funny! i have an image of the left dressed for jousting

186 Mr. Neutron  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:52am

As soon as I read this on AP I thought of LGF and the rotating titles.

"Don't Tase me, bro" - classic.

187 mad_scientist  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:09:58am
He is known to them apparently, and he wasn't interested in answers, just acting like an immature prick.

Agreed. All he wanted to do was get up there, be the center of attention and spout all the conspiracy theories that he and his other cracked out friends could come up with.

There were some new ones in there on me...like did anyone hear him rant something about "diebold voting machines that counted backwards"?

What is wrong with people these days...I would agree normally that that an semi-unruly/unarmed person shouldnt be tazed if there is no risk of injury to anyone, but this guy was basically sturggeling the whole time...the cops were just trying to get him pinned...who knows what happened...

maybe he reached a little to close to an officers weapon? Or possibly even accidently struck an officer in the struggle...if he would have just stopped being a douchebag, and stayed still, he could have mouthed off all he wanted when the cuffs got on. Then he could return home to his friends and say how he was oppressed by the man, and he will be given the highest of all moonbat honors, that of be a victim...what a stupid a-hole this guy was all around.

188 Thanos  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:10:11am

re: #146 Eagle

BTW,

TASER ===

Thomas
A
Swift
Electric
Rifle

And now you know.

Did someone say Tom Swift?
I think the guy was a Brungarian agent...

189 jcbunga  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:10:56am

'member the South Park episode where the disabled woman's electric chair ran out of power in the middle of the street and Cartman tasered it?

The rest is classic...er, I mean I was appalled.

190 rab3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:11:06am

Another gathering of Idiots.

The Code Pink Hate-America Happy Hour


Mary Katharine Ham reports.

Well, that’s the logic on display on the anti-war Left these days. Saturday, I went to a Code Pink and Iraq Veterans Against the War karaoke night to check it out first hand. They always say they truly love the country. Surely, after a couple beers, they’d be raising one for Old Glory and singing God Bless America.

Wrong. The first break in the singing, which consisted of lilting old protest songs and wilted old hippies from another war, came a few minutes after I walked in. An emcee from one of the sponsoring groups took the stage to announce the purpose of the night.

Emcee: We’re here tonight to recognize that the government is moving us in the wrong direction. And it’s not just now. It’s a whole series of what we call wrong direction.

/everyone sing along.

191 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:11:14am

re: #117 goodbye_natalie Well, whether or not his freedom of speech rights were or were not violated isn't really the case (my earlier post was designed to try to get this fact out.). The simple matter is, whether or not he was talking/ranting/screeching into the microphone, once told by the Security Guards to stop, he should have. They might have abridged his free speech rights, but that's a matter to be settled in the court(s).
When told to knock it off and come with us by the security guards, IMO, he shoulda shut the hell up and gone with them.
HE provoked what happened afterwards (and not just the tasering).

192 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:11:46am

RTLM (#67),

Thanks for the link.

"There are people that know I'm here. You can't just like, kill me."

"Oh my god. You're giving me to the government, They're giving me to the government. They're giving me to the government."

"I don't want to give you that. [his name] I'm afraid. I'm not telling you anything."

"Everyone that was here today please go to the police station. Ask them where's the guy that was at the protest. Because They're going to try to kill me. They are going to try to kill me."

This guy needs a serious psych evaluation.

193 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:12:00am
194 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:12:21am

re: #185 phoenixgirl

re: #178 EtNorskTroll

omg that is funny! i have an image of the left dressed for jousting

Wait for it, phoenixgirl...

Waaait for it...

Here come the Monty Python jokes:

195 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:12:33am

re: #123 bulwrk If only.

196 southernborn  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:13:17am

my only regret is, they didn't taser John F**king Kerry

197 NoSubmission  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:14:06am

Instead of screaming for help like a whiny child, he should have just cooperated with security. Was he hoping for a full-blown riot over his inane questions?

That said, I'm glad it was at a Kerry talk instead of a Republican forum.

198 Smilin' Jack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:14:09am

I agree with the NorskTroll; Tasering was over the line. I would think the cops would be trained in alternate ways to control unruly people. Security cops aren't always the best trained, but they somehow got by for years before the invention of the taser. Seems like someone had a new toy he wanted to try out. I don't advocate prosecuting the cop or anything like that; just condemning taser use when there's no serious threat.

In the years ahead, I can see myself and other lizards in the position of that moonbat. Though I think we would all handle ourselves better than he did, I don't think any of us should have a taser waved under our nose. Beware the precedent, indeed.
SJ

199 goodbye_natalie  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:14:29am
200 wolverine20  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:14:36am

re: #174 TeamDub

(cop friends + alcohol = some bad decisions)

ROTFLMAO

201 daddycrack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:14:53am

Help! Help! I'm being repressed.

Come see the violence inherited in the system.

Sorry had to.

202 zandtar  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:15:28am

re: #174 TeamDub

And for the record, I've been tased and shot with the 2-probe taser gun and, while not exactly pleasant, shouldn't cause infantile screeching.

(cop friends + alcohol = some bad decisions)

Heh, reminds me of the same, when telling a cop friend pressure points don't work. Which, got me a quick demonstration, that had me on the ground.

203 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:16:51am

re: #198 Smilin' Jack

I agree with the NorskTroll; Tasering was over the line. I would think the cops would be trained in alternate ways to control unruly people. Security cops aren't always the best trained, but they somehow got by for years before the invention of the taser. Seems like someone had a new toy he wanted to try out. I don't advocate prosecuting the cop or anything like that; just condemning taser use when there's no serious threat.

In the years ahead, I can see myself and other lizards in the position of that moonbat. Though I think we would all handle ourselves better than he did, I don't think any of us should have a taser waved under our nose. Beware the precedent, indeed.
SJ

Agreed - that's why I feel like it was a tad overboard.

If this poor simp had been a conservative asking difficult (or even crazy) questions and suffered the same fate would everyone here be as gung ho?

Maybe, since he was eventually in a physical confrontation, but I just don't like the precedent.

204 stranded conservative  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:17:16am

Again, I have no problem with the police removing him from the venue both for safety and because he was disruptive. However, tasering him did not seem to quiet or subdue him. It just made him scream louder. My point is that they had sufficient (or should have been sufficient) manpower to remove him without tasering him. I am not disputing that they had the right to do it. I just don't think it was the best choice under the circumstances. All it did is create a martyr for the next 15 minutes.

Secondly, the reaction of the audience is what really concerned me. They were so passive. I think about the Virginia Tech shootings and I wonder if that's what the kids did there when Cho burst into the classroom. Just sit and hope he would go away.

205 Endangered in MASS  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:17:18am

I love the sound of moonbats being tased in the morning.

206 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:17:38am

Oh, give me land, lots of land under starry skies above, Don't Tase me bro
Let me ride through the wide open country that I love, Don't Tase me bro
Let me be by myself in the evenin' breeze
And listen to the murmur of the cottonwood trees
Send me off forever but I ask you please, Don't Tase me bro

207 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:17:39am

re: #202 zandtar

re: #174 TeamDub

And for the record, I've been tased and shot with the 2-probe taser gun and, while not exactly pleasant, shouldn't cause infantile screeching.

(cop friends + alcohol = some bad decisions)

Heh, reminds me of the same, when telling a cop friend pressure points don't work. Which, got me a quick demonstration, that had me on the ground.

Oh yes, they work. They work well.

208 easy  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:17:53am

You cannot resist the cops. They can use whatever force is necessary. Try it sometime.

209 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:18:33am

re: #184 TeamDub

re: #175 Hard Right

What? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.

Let me put it this way, doesn't matter whether the cops were right to remove him (they were), when you fight them, then resist arrest, refuse their commands to put your hands behind your back (like him), you're going to get tazered.
That people here actually think it was excessive tells me you haven't had to do those officer's jobs and don't understand the leeway they have. Those cops will not be punished in any way-they behaved exactly as they were supposed to.

210 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:18:41am

#203 TeamDub

Taze the lad! It might be the first time in his life someone told him no and actually meant it.

Who knows, it might do him some good someday.

211 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:19:47am

re: #202 zandtar

On a related note, won a $100 bet when I stayed standing for 5 seconds after being shot with the 2-probe taser.

Not fun, not easy... not recommended.

212 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:10am

re: #209 Hard Right

Well, I generally agree, but I simply don't like the chain of events that led to said tasering.

Just sayin'.

213 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:24am

realwest (#141),

re: #94 Geepers Hi Ya Geepers! 50k? I thought it was more like 4,000,000 - no?!

I think the moonbat is making reference to Ohio. And if OH's Electoral College votes had gone to Kerry He'd have won. You have to really dig deep to try to figure out what a moonbat is attempting to say.

214 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:24am

I just do not see how this tasering was justified. This is obvious police misconduct. I don't even understand why they tried to detain him after he was done asking questions. It's absurd!

215 zandtar  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:37am

re: #207 TeamDub

re: #202 zandtar

re: #174 TeamDub

And for the record, I've been tased and shot with the 2-probe taser gun and, while not exactly pleasant, shouldn't cause infantile screeching.

(cop friends + alcohol = some bad decisions)

Heh, reminds me of the same, when telling a cop friend pressure points don't work. Which, got me a quick demonstration, that had me on the ground.

Oh yes, they work. They work well.

Indeed they do. Sobered me right up, and begging for it to stop. We now refer to it as 'Pressure Point Theater'

216 mad_scientist  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:37am

re: #99 JimmyTheClaw

someone needs to dub over the cops so they say respect my autharitah
rofl

that was a great south park episode..."respect my authoritah!"

217 Cpt. Disco  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:21:51am

re: #161 TeamDub

He was arrested because he refused to follow the orders the officers gave him. Plain and simple. If he would have stopped talking and left, there would have been no further action.

218 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:22:00am

re: #180 wolverine20

re: #125 Sizzlack

Actually reports are that they were going to remove him from the room immediately when he rushed the stage/mics, but JK intervened and told them to let him ask his Q(s). Based upon his less than rationale approach, the guards/cops stayed at his side. It is a very good thing that SS agents were not present (as well they shouldn't have been), because he never would have even gotten to the mic!

Watch the video...the mics arent close to the stage. they are in the middle of the audience. He preached his moonbat logic for the first minute and a half of his two minutes of alloted time, then began to askquestions when he was told his time was up. They cut off his mic but he continued to scream his questions. From the stage Kerry was telling them he wanted to answer, but the guy refused to back down and the university had him removed. He didnt charge the mics or rush the stage.

219 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:22:29am

re: #215 zandtar

Heh...

'Pressure Point Theater'

I'd LOVE to see that in the rotation...

220 southernborn  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:23:30am

If I m not mistaken, tasering is so that no bones be broken, no skulls fractured, No bullets piercing..so take your pick. He was a wild sob with no regard for police orders. yep he deserved just what he got.

221 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:23:34am

re: #208 easy

You cannot resist the cops. They can use whatever force is necessary. Try it sometime.

Not cops, easy.

Security goons personnel.

~ENT

222 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:23:57am

If an investigation determines it excessive force, do I still say he deserved it and that it was appropriate?

/Just thinking out loud

223 Naso Tang  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:23:57am

The guy obviously has social issues, as in "what have I done? What have I done?", but equally sad is the comments from other "students" in the news article. They think this is political discourse.

224 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:11am

#214 BLBfootballs

Ok, fine. Everyone has a different point of view.

Argue with a cop, you're on your own sport. It's not a prudent thing to do. If you have a beef settle it afterwards. Not at the moment.

If you chose to do otherwise, don't come crying to me through your gums.

225 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:13am

re: #55 Live4Truth

I hate to admit it, but I enjoyed that. The good guys won.

Aside from that, notice how those two cops (or maybe they were just security guards) who first attempted to restrain the guy where completely ineffective? He could wiggle away from both of them, even when one cop had some sort of arm-hold on him. It wasn't until the really big cop stepped in, that the guy was taken down. And even then, it took a long time for a group of about five cops to get cuffs on him and taze him in order to be able to take him away. So my question: was the guy on drugs, or were the cops/guards just not very good at it?

***
***
IT IS EASY for people who have no experience or who have never had to subdue another person, to belittle, second guess, or armchair quarterback the efforts of the Law Enforcement or Security officers involved. I have in previous comments read references to the physical and other aspects of the officers involved. One even said this guy would 'wiggle' away from the cops. IF you would notice, this guy is not a small guy, and also NOT weak looking in physical size.
People like this DO NOT 'wiggle' away from you, they jerk, shove, twist, and very forcefully drag you with them. No matter how good you are at what you do, or your physical size, I know from personal experience, that to keep from breaking bones and causing severe contusions(bruises,scrapes,etc.)you wont hold a person or grab so hard or forceful at first, that even a small person can fight you with all their strength and get loose make it look like you are inept.
When the level of force you are using is not enough to subdue an individual who is resisting being subdued or arrest after you have tried to peaceably stop his behavior, you are allowed to use the next level of force, short of bodily harm, unless the individual has a weapon or is combative in a manner that puts the officers in probability of physical harm, or life at risk, at which time the officer is authorized to use sufficient or deadly force.

226 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:14am
227 Dirk Diggler  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:33am

Tasering was quite appropriate.

Andrew Meyer wasn't there to ask serious questions. He was there to engage in a narcissistic (almost masturbatory) celebration of his own moral superiority.

228 phoenixgirl  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:43am

re: #203 TeamDub

i would feel the same if it was a conservative...

229 ointmentfly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:24:46am

Accoring to liberals, there is no order and therefore no consequences for disorder. Saddam Hussein should have been left in charge of Iraq, but "contained" whatever that means to a billionaire sitting on billions more in oil. This idiot UF jackass should have just been left to rant forever. Rodney King should have been able to resist until the cows came home.

230 Eagle  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:25:15am

re: #188 Thanos

Thanks. I used to love reading those books as a boy.

231 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:25:21am

He wasn't threatre: #198 Smilin' Jack

I agree with the NorskTroll; Tasering was over the line. I would think the cops would be trained in alternate ways to control unruly people. Security cops aren't always the best trained, but they somehow got by for years before the invention of the taser. Seems like someone had a new toy he wanted to try out. I don't advocate prosecuting the cop or anything like that; just condemning taser use when there's no serious threat.

In the years ahead, I can see myself and other lizards in the position of that moonbat. Though I think we would all handle ourselves better than he did, I don't think any of us should have a taser waved under our nose. Beware the precedent, indeed.
SJ

No one waved a Tazer under his nose. That's hyperbole. We won't face such a fate because we aren't idiots looking for trouble. As for other methods before the tazer, they had them. They're called the baton, and more recently pepper spray. Other items include the sap or blackjack.
Folks, the Tazer is used on noncompliant people all the time. It also protects the officers from being hurt in addition to the suspect. The use in this case was not excessive in any way, shape or form.

232 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:26:11am

re: #209 Hard Right

re: #184 TeamDub

re: #175 Hard Right

What? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.

Let me put it this way, doesn't matter whether the cops were right to remove him (they were), when you fight them, then resist arrest, refuse their commands to put your hands behind your back (like him), you're going to get tazered.
That people here actually think it was excessive tells me you haven't had to do those officer's jobs and don't understand the leeway they have. Those cops will not be punished in any way-they behaved exactly as they were supposed to.

I used to work as an Orange County sheriff's deputy, Hard Right.

Next question?

~Norsk Troll

233 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:26:22am

re: #213 Geepers Um, my shovels and post hole diggers don't work well as far down as you'd need to go to figure him out.

234 Dirk Diggler  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:26:31am

Kerry must have been for tasering the protestor before he was against it...

Kerry Condemns Heckler Arrest

235 filetandrelease  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:26:47am

re: #198 Smilin' Jack

I would think the cops would be trained in alternate ways to control unruly people

Of course they are, a good friend of mine has a missing front tooth to prove it.

Note: if grabbed from behind during a brawl, don't turn around and punch before identifying who it is.

236 ernieg  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:27:15am

Instapundit's take on this:

THEY TOLD ME THAT IF GEORGE W. BUSH WERE REELECTED, those who spoke out to authority would be taken down by its minions. And they were right!


Heh™.

237 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:27:51am

re: #226 buzzsawmonkey Thanks. I knew you could improve on that. :~)

238 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:29:16am

re: #224 BulgarWheat

#214 BLBfootballs

Ok, fine. Everyone has a different point of view.

Argue with a cop, you're on your own sport. It's not a prudent thing to do. If you have a beef settle it afterwards. Not at the moment.

If you chose to do otherwise, don't come crying to me through your gums.

The issue isn't about "arguing" with cops. It's about whether the cops behaved appropriately. They clearly did not. People have a free speech right to ask irritating and obnoxious questions. The questioner was indeed irritating and a bit rude but not otherwise out of line. His questions had ended and Kerry's response had already begun. There was no reason for police intervention at that point.

It's not the police's job to protect the delicate feelings and poll ratings of politicians. I understand why he argued with the police. The police were wrong, aggressive and totally out of line.

239 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:29:33am

re: #218 Sizzlack

re: #180 wolverine20


re: #125 Sizzlack

Actually reports are that they were going to remove him from the room immediately when he rushed the stage/mics, but JK intervened and told them to let him ask his Q(s). Based upon his less than rationale approach, the guards/cops stayed at his side. It is a very good thing that SS agents were not present (as well they shouldn't have been), because he never would have even gotten to the mic!


Watch the video...the mics arent close to the stage. they are in the middle of the audience. He preached his moonbat logic for the first minute and a half of his two minutes of alloted time, then began to askquestions when he was told his time was up. They cut off his mic but he continued to scream his questions. From the stage Kerry was telling them he wanted to answer, but the guy refused to back down and the university had him removed. He didnt charge the mics or rush the stage.

Yes he did run up to the mic. That's why the cops were behind him. They had grabbed him, but Kerry said to let him go and ask his question. There is more than one vid out there that shows this. So the fact is, he rushed the mic.

240 mikefln  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:29:51am

re: #103 Whale Watcher

His mother should have taught him some manners. Don't want to be tased? Then behave yourself in public and respect your elders and superiors.

If he were my kid, I would taser him twice more when he came home.

This episode (as well as a lot of the other jackassery we're seeing these days) is a direct result of treating our kids like children into their 20's.

Thanks a lot, Dr. Spock.

241 stranded conservative  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:30:22am

Uh... I just watched the other footage from closer to the front of the room in comment #67. It also appears that there was more audience involvement from that angle than could be heard from the back. Most of them seemed amused except for the girls that were really upset.

I honestly don't think this guy has ever been told "no" before. He can't believe that anyone else has a right to tell him what to do. He really thinks the "government" is going to kill him. I agree with the poster that recommended a psych evaluation.

242 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:30:50am

Charles,

Maybe you could update this with RTML's LiveLeak link.

It shows him after being taken from the auditorium carrying on and on about how he's "being given to the government" and how "they're going to try to kill me". This guy is a serious nut case.

243 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:30:56am
244 Spiny Norman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:31:02am

re: #227 Dirk Diggler

Tasering was quite appropriate.

Andrew Meyer wasn't there to ask serious questions. He was there to engage in a narcissistic (almost masturbatory) celebration of his own moral superiority.

Exactly. I was thinking much the same thing in #31.

245 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:31:21am

re: #239 Hard Right

I was under the impression it was a Q&A (hence the mics in the crowd) and he got up and was allowed to ask a question...yes he hijacked the Q&A but I didnt think this guy like plowed thru people to get to the mic when he wasnt supposed to
thats not how any of the stories i read/watched presented it

246 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:01am

#238 BLBfootballs

Like I said, you're entitled to your point of view.

Don't get the oatmeal on me complaining.

That's my point of view

247 crazytraveler  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:05am

I giggled when I saw the video, because he's clearly a dumbass who deserved it. I'm fine with all of this. :) I kinda feel bad for Kerry at some level because he's giving a talk, yadda yadda and all of the sudden, this lamo starts talking all crazy.

It's like this kid knew he'd be tasered and end up with free publicity.

But as we all know, this is Bush's fault.

248 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:10am

re: #232 EtNorskTroll

re: #209 Hard Right


re: #184 TeamDub

re: #175 Hard Right

What? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.


Let me put it this way, doesn't matter whether the cops were right to remove him (they were), when you fight them, then resist arrest, refuse their commands to put your hands behind your back (like him), you're going to get tazered.
That people here actually think it was excessive tells me you haven't had to do those officer's jobs and don't understand the leeway they have. Those cops will not be punished in any way-they behaved exactly as they were supposed to.

I used to work as an Orange County sheriff's deputy, Hard Right.

Next question?

~Norsk Troll

I stand corrected. Change it to Most of you. However, it's your opinion they shouldn't have tazered him. Bet there are many, like my father who would agree they did the right thing.

249 Spiny Norman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:19am

re: #243 buzzsawmonkey

BTW, the whole "Don't tase me! Don't tase me!" is highly reminiscent of Br'er Rabbit, is it not?

"Pleeeze don't fling me in dat brier patch, Br'er Bear!"

Hmmm... interesting.

::pyramids fingers in Mr Burns fashion::

250 Rogue198  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:24am

Served the punk right...he wanted to be a marytr and he got his wish.

Still, I can't watch this video and not think:

"“Come see the violence inherit in the system. HELP! HELP! I’m being repressed!”

251 stranded conservative  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:32:58am

Last comment, I promise.

That was a really sparse crowd to hear someone who was elected president in 2004.

/

252 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:33:00am

I hope that guy's going to be OK.

253 Drained Brain  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:33:16am

#47 Team Dub
He was tasered in a fashion reminiscent of Jenjis Kahn...

LMAO - you've even gotten the pronunciation perfected...

254 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:33:36am

re: #225 BODYGUARDEAGLE

re: #231 Hard Right

What you guys said. It doesn't matter if they were police or private security guards hired by the school. He was asked to shut up and leave the auditorium with the security guards. HE resisted them. More security guards got involved and HE resisted them, too. At some point y'all have to ask yourself - is it better to obey the lawful requests of the first two security guards, the more forcefull "requests" of the additional security guards or get tasered?
HE was responsible for what happened. Period.

255 Gringo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:33:47am

The names are different, but the personalities are the same...so, it begs the question: Is Andrew Meyer really Scott Beauchamp's brother?

256 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:34:01am
257 Spiny Norman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:34:14am

re: #242 Geepers

Charles,

Maybe you could update this with RTML's LiveLeak link.

It shows him after being taken from the auditorium carrying on and on about how he's "being given to the government" and how "they're going to try to kill me". This guy is a serious nut case.

ROFLMAO!

258 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:34:18am

re: #232 EtNorskTroll

ANYONE WHO HAS WORKED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, has experienced an individual like this guy, and knows the type of situation it can evolve into if not stopped immediately. Therefore it does seem justified to use the Taser. IMHO

BODYGUARDEAGLE

259 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:34:45am

#250 Rogue198

Truly a Monty Python moment if I ever saw one!

This young little asshat went out of his way to instigate this.

Don't cry about getting wet when you piss in the wind.

Doesn't take a rocket scientist

260 Gringo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:35:03am

re: #254 realwest

re: #225 BODYGUARDEAGLE

re: #231 Hard Right

What you guys said. It doesn't matter if they were police or private security guards hired by the school. He was asked to shut up and leave the auditorium with the security guards. HE resisted them. More security guards got involved and HE resisted them, too. At some point y'all have to ask yourself - is it better to obey the lawful requests of the first two security guards, the more forcefull "requests" of the additional security guards or get tasered?
HE was responsible for what happened. Period.

___
Exactly right!

261 Smilin' Jack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:35:58am

As Mr. Etrain pointed out in an earlier thread, We think the moonbats are just kooks. The moonbats think conservatives are pure evil. If they get their hands on enough power, whatever they have that passes for principles will be tossed out and they will try to eliminate us. By killing off "evil" they'll think they're saving the world.

This guy, whoever he is, will probably become some kind of moonbat symbol/martyr/saint. If the Right is on record that he deserved Tasering then, in their moonbat minds, a conservative will deserve far worse...not that that won't happen anyway.
SJ

262 iirightii  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:36:09am

"I'm not, as you so colloquially put it, 'your bro'... Bzzzt!"

Aaahg, you're killin' me, Sparks!


- iirightii

263 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:37:08am

re: #238 BLBfootballs "It's not the police's job to protect the delicate feelings and poll ratings of politicians. I understand why he argued with the police. The police were wrong, aggressive and totally out of line." Even if what you say is true, legally the security guards were asked to remove this person from the auditorium. They asked him to and he said no and HE started the fracus.
If you believe the police were wrong, aggressive and totally out of line, then you sue their ass off for it - you don't get into a fight with, ultimately 6 or 8 of 'em.

264 EC Marm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:38:34am

re: #240 mikefln

This episode (as well as a lot of the other jackassery we're seeing these days) is a direct result of treating our kids like children into their 20's.

Thanks a lot, Dr. Spock.


Why blame Spock? He would have set his phaser to stun.
What's that?
Wrong Spock?
Sorry.

265 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:38:45am

re: #261 Smilin' Jack

The moonbats think conservatives are pure evil. If they get their hands on enough power, whatever they have that passes for principles will be tossed out and they will try to eliminate us. SJ

Like Liz Hasslebeck on the view
According to Barry Manilow she is "dangerous" and he refuses to do the show unless she is not present

266 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:38:47am

BLBfootballs says:

The issue isn't about "arguing" with cops.

Yes it is. If he would have left when asked he would have walked away.

It's about whether the cops behaved appropriately. They clearly did not. People have a free speech right to ask irritating and obnoxious questions.

But not the "right" to resist arrest.

It's not the police's job to protect the delicate feelings and poll ratings of politicians.

What utter nonsense.

267 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:39:24am

re: #248 Hard Right

re: #232 EtNorskTroll

re: #209 Hard Right


re: #184 TeamDub


re: #175 Hard RightWhat? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.

I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.


Let me put it this way, doesn't matter whether the cops were right to remove him (they were), when you fight them, then resist arrest, refuse their commands to put your hands behind your back (like him), you're going to get tazered.
That people here actually think it was excessive tells me you haven't had to do those officer's jobs and don't understand the leeway they have. Those cops will not be punished in any way-they behaved exactly as they were supposed to.


I used to work as an Orange County sheriff's deputy, Hard Right.Next question?

~Norsk Troll

I stand corrected. Change it to Most of you. However, it's your opinion they shouldn't have tazered him. Bet there are many, like my father who would agree they did the right thing.

The LAPD did this kind of thing in the 80's with nunchucks to get the anti-abortion protesters to get up from their sit-ins to protest the children being murdered in the clinics (according to them).

The cops would put the nunchucks around the wrists and then 'twist' the chucks around and pull back on them.

They broke many, many little bones in the wrists of people because they wouldn't get up.

Many protesters live in agony to this day from the torture inflicted upon them.

That little stunt by the LAPD figured prominently in my decision to leave the force. I'm not a thug. I don't care if I have the legal right to be one or not...and I refuse to be associated with people who behave like thugs.

I have an engineering degree, now.

Thank God~!

~Norsk Troll

268 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:39:38am

As a conservative, it disgusts me to see this sort of heavy handedness. Yes, to all of the comments about brats not respecting decorum and all that...I agree with you, BUT, THIS MAN HAS THE RIGHT to speak, whether you agree with his views or not (I do not). Words that are not incitement to violence should NEVER be met with force. This goes completely against the founding principles of this country...As I am certain the Framers of the Constitution would have been carted off by the British, if they could have been. Not that this guy is in any danger of being on their level. I fully believe that you are allowed to resist an unlawful arrest. This man offered NO offense to the officers, simply resisted. In light of the video, this arrest should be thrown out and the officers suspended without pay (at the very least). To those of you who believe this was an appropriate action on the part of the university and officers...Wait until it's you...If you allow this to stand, it will not be long.

Look at CSPAN, hell look at any public discourse. These things happen everyday. Is it right? No, of course not, but you did not see Barbara Boxer being manhandled for going over her alloted time in questioning Petraeus.

269 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:40:01am

re: #240 mikefln

re: #103 Whale Watcher

His mother should have taught him some manners. Don't want to be tased? Then behave yourself in public and respect your elders and superiors.

If he were my kid, I would taser him twice more when he came home.

This episode (as well as a lot of the other jackassery we're seeing these days) is a direct result of treating our kids like children into their 20's.

Thanks a lot, Dr. Spock.

***
***
MIKE... YOU are right on the money DUDE !

270 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:40:06am

re: #245 Sizzlack

re: #239 Hard Right

I was under the impression it was a Q&A (hence the mics in the crowd) and he got up and was allowed to ask a question...yes he hijacked the Q&A but I didnt think this guy like plowed thru people to get to the mic when he wasnt supposed to
thats not how any of the stories i read/watched presented it

He was at the end of the line when it was announced either no more questions or the next question the last question. At that point he rushed past everyone ahead of him to get to the microphone.

ET, watched cops yesterday and they tazered a guy for just refusing commands. Things change. We could argue all day about whether or not it's for the better.

Fellow lizards, this guy is not deserving of your sympathy. He behaved that way to provoke an incident and he got one.

271 Gringo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:40:08am

re: #260 Gringo

re: #254 realwest

re: #225 BODYGUARDEAGLE

re: #231 Hard Right

What you guys said. It doesn't matter if they were police or private security guards hired by the school. He was asked to shut up and leave the auditorium with the security guards. HE resisted them. More security guards got involved and HE resisted them, too. At some point y'all have to ask yourself - is it better to obey the lawful requests of the first two security guards, the more forcefull "requests" of the additional security guards or get tasered?
HE was responsible for what happened. Period.

___ ___
Exactly right!

___
Ditto to: #259 BulgarWheat

#258 BODYGUARDEAGLE

I see no problem with how this was handled.

272 Lawrence Schmerel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:41:18am

What a juvenile punk. You can guess he voted for Kerry, too.

273 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:41:18am

#263 realwest

How's it going REAL?

This is the funniest mid-afternoon thread I've seen in ages!

I have to jump on calls in a little while, and I'm sitting here giggling at all this navel gazing "outrage" when I should be eating lunch.

As flounder said in Animal House, "Oh boy, this is gonna be good!"

274 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:41:37am

re: #268 Hawk59

That's my take on it Hawk.

I'm just extrapolating it out a few years and I don't like what I see.

275 Sizzlack  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:41:59am

re: #270 Hard Right

Im not defending the guy or feel any sympathy for him...a few of my earlier posts in this thread clearly show that. However, he was not a security threat to Kerry or anyone else...just a loon with a loud mouth. He deserved what he got, thats what happens when you resist arrest.

276 truculentinfidel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:43:34am

BWWWAAAHHH-HHAAA!

277 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:43:43am

re: #258 BODYGUARDEAGLE

re: #232 EtNorskTroll

ANYONE WHO HAS WORKED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, has experienced an individual like this guy, and knows the type of situation it can evolve into if not stopped immediately. Therefore it does seem justified to use the Taser. IMHO

BODYGUARDEAGLE

With 6 guys on top of him?

Did you see the same video that I saw, Body?

When he's down on the ground, you put away the weapons (unless he still has one).

A tazer is a weapon...it's not a 'persuader'

What are your thoughts: is a tazer a weapon to you, or a tool to get people to do what you want them to do?

/just askin'...

(I think I might be getting to the bottom of this)

~Norsk

278 JamesTKirk  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:44:05am

re: #97 pat

OT
Muslim dentists in London force NHS patients into burqua as a condition of dental care.
[Link: www.dailymail.co.uk...]

How does the dentist get to your mouth if you're in a burqa?

Do you have to breastfeed him first or something?

279 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:44:16am

Hawk59 says:

As a conservative,...

The first tell tale signs of a moby.

280 bulwrk  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:44:27am

re: #238 BLBfootballs


You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger
And you don't mess around with Jim

281 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:44:45am

re: #268 Hawk59 With all due respect when you say " I fully believe that you are allowed to resist an unlawful arrest. This man offered NO offense to the officers, simply resisted. In light of the video, this arrest should be thrown out and the officers suspended without pay (at the very least)." you are stating your beliefs.
As a matter of law you do NOT have the right to decide for yourself whether or not it's an unlawful arrest, that's what the courts are here to determine.I think the officers should be commeded for removing him without his or they're suffering any broken bones, serious contusions or worse.

282 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:45:12am

re: #279 Geepers

Hawk59 says:

As a conservative,...

The first tell tale signs of a moby.

I guess I should have saved my "uncalled for" comment.

283 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:45:16am

re: #274 TeamDub


That's my point exactly...Physical violence should never be the answer to bad manners. Sorry.

284 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:47:15am

#283 Hawk59

Nonsense. Physical violence is often the only response to bad manners. It works almost everytime.

Please don't cut in front of me when I'm standing in line. That would be bad manners.

285 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:47:27am

re: #267 EtNorskTroll

re: #248 Hard Right


re: #232 EtNorskTroll

re: #209 Hard Right

re: #184 TeamDub

re: #175 Hard RightWhat? He rushes ahead of everyone waiting in line to ask a question when told they wouldn't take anymore, refuses to leave the microphone and asks question after question including why Bush wasn't impeached since Clinton was over the "blowjob", then fights the police.
I'd say it was quite called for.

Well, you certainly have an appropriate moniker.


Let me put it this way, doesn't matter whether the cops were right to remove him (they were), when you fight them, then resist arrest, refuse their commands to put your hands behind your back (like him), you're going to get tazered.
That people here actually think it was excessive tells me you haven't had to do those officer's jobs and don't understand the leeway they have. Those cops will not be punished in any way-they behaved exactly as they were supposed to.

I used to work as an Orange County sheriff's deputy, Hard Right.Next question?

~Norsk Troll


I stand corrected. Change it to Most of you. However, it's your opinion they shouldn't have tazered him. Bet there are many, like my father who would agree they did the right thing.

The LAPD did this kind of thing in the 80's with nunchucks to get the anti-abortion protesters to get up from their sit-ins to protest the children being murdered in the clinics (according to them).

The cops would put the nunchucks around the wrists and then 'twist' the chucks around and pull back on them.

They broke many, many little bones in the wrists of people because they wouldn't get up.

Many protesters live in agony to this day from the torture inflicted upon them.

That little stunt by the LAPD figured prominently in my decision to leave the force. I'm not a thug. I don't care if I have the legal right to be one or not...and I refuse to be associated with people who behave like thugs.

I have an engineering degree, now.

Thank God~!

~Norsk Troll

Jeez. I don't blame you. I admit I was not aware of LAPD doing that. However, that is different from tazering as that caused lasting physical harm. Not to mention he wasn't resisting non-violently.

286 MadRat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:48:09am

Here's how it actually happened (from BoingBoing)...



I couldn't get to my camera in time to record his entrance, but this guy basically comes running in with 4 or 5 cops in tow and says he has been running around trying to get in to ask a question and the cops are going to arrest him for it. They almost do it then but Sen. Kerry says he will answer it. He then answers a previous question someone else asked (I cut that part out because it isn't important to this video) then the guy asks his questions and when he is done all hell breaks lose.

To the cop haters: I have no doubt the cops were going exactly by the book, the problem isn't them, its the book! they were doing their job and looked just as confused as this kid (This isn't something that they deal with often).


As the kid writhes on the ground screaming for mercy, Kerry drones on in his school-principal-on-thorazine style.

How did CNN Headline "News" spin it? They show scenes of the guy just as he's finishing taking then the scenes of him being attacked by people in uniform, then cut to him screaming over and over "I didn't do anything! I didn't do anything!"

There's no mention that the "police" were campus security, no footage of the guy running into the room while being chased by security, no video of him shouting like a lunatic at one of the highest ranking public officials in the federal government about how Kerry actually won the election and no shots of security calmly standing behind him during his rant. Did CNN Headline mention of the killing of Robert Kennedy or John Kennedy, the nearly fatal shooting of Ronald Regan or the shots fired at Gerald Ford? No. Did they mention that the guy was still screaming his head off long AFTER he was tased and thus trying to play up what was happening as much as possible? No.

Already CNN's starting to back peddle on the story showing interviews of witnesses saying, "Yeah the cops were justified in what they did," and another saying, "This was really brutal."

287 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:49:28am

re: #281 realwest

Sorry Real, and with all due respect, not only do I believe you are allowed to resist a plainly unlawful arrest, you are morally obliged to do so. Again, and as "TeamDub" so well stated...Extrapolate.

288 Mostly Annoyed  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:50:13am

This guy is a total nut case. I'm sure he has attended classes in protesting and resisting arrest at a publicly funded university.

When I was growing up in Florida one of the first things I learned about police is you NEVER resist arrest. Let them arrest you and work things out later. If he wasn't trying to make a scene and had gone quietly, he probably would have been let go with no charges. He brought this on himself and he knows it. I'm sure this is what he wanted to happen right down to the tazer. He probably called the ACLU before the event.

Tazing him is much more humane than what they did before tazers. In some places he would have ended up in the hospital for a few days if he survived his arrest at all. If it weren't for the ACLU he would have been one chance to comply with officers before they knocked him down, hog tied him, carried him out by his arms and legs and throw him in the back of a cruiser within 2 minutes.

He must be crazy, most sane moonbats know to just go limp so they have to carry you out... Just ask old Cindy.

289 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:50:14am

re: #266 Geepers

BLBfootballs says:

The issue isn't about "arguing" with cops.

Yes it is. If he would have left when asked he would have walked away.

It's about whether the cops behaved appropriately. They clearly did not. People have a free speech right to ask irritating and obnoxious questions.

But not the "right" to resist arrest.

It's not the police's job to protect the delicate feelings and poll ratings of politicians.

What utter nonsense.

The police had no right to arrest the questioner. They had no business speaking with him or being involved whatsoever aside from keeping an eye on him. The guy did nothing wrong aside from asking an irritating set of questions. It is not illegal to question in an irritating manner. I have been at many speakers' events where audience members ask annoying questions.

Being a moonbat is foolish, immature and troubling--and I have little doubt that the fellow on film is indeed immature and foolish--but it's not illegal. Woe to the Republic if we set police on the tails of obnoxious speakers.

What if this guy was a right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions--would it have been alright for the cops to detain and taser the guy then?

290 jayzee  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:50:23am

re: #268 Hawk59


I disagree. This is NOT a free speech issue. There are laws which govern speech at all universities, public and private. This kid did violate those rules and the police were justified in getting him to stop his outburst. However, the question should be, was the appropriate force used to stop his outburst, or were the police heavy handed.

I can't tell by looking at the videos I have seen. Was the guy kicking and screaming even when down? Did he jeopardize anyone involved with subduing him? I don't know, but believe it will eventually be made clear.

291 elevatorman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:50:50am

#201 & #250
Monty would not be happy. It is neither the violence "inherited" or "inherit."
It is inherent. Now I fart in your general direction.

292 Dirk Diggler  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:51:20am

Hawk59,

As a conservative, it disgusts me to see this sort of heavy handedness. Yes, to all of the comments about brats not respecting decorum and all that...I agree with you, BUT, THIS MAN HAS THE RIGHT to speak...

And he spoke. When the time came to shut up he refused. When ordered to cease and desist he resisted.

293 easy  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:51:27am

re: #221 EtNorskTroll

re: #208 easy


You cannot resist the cops. They can use whatever force is necessary. Try it sometime.

Not cops, easy.

Security goons personnel.

~ENT

University of Florida Police Department

294 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:52:55am

re: #268 Hawk59

As a conservative, it disgusts me to see this sort of heavy handedness. Yes, to all of the comments about brats not respecting decorum and all that...I agree with you, BUT, THIS MAN HAS THE RIGHT to speak, whether you agree with his views or not (I do not). Words that are not incitement to violence should NEVER be met with force. This goes completely against the founding principles of this country...As I am certain the Framers of the Constitution would have been carted off by the British, if they could have been. Not that this guy is in any danger of being on their level. I fully believe that you are allowed to resist an unlawful arrest. This man offered NO offense to the officers, simply resisted. In light of the video, this arrest should be thrown out and the officers suspended without pay (at the very least). To those of you who believe this was an appropriate action on the part of the university and officers...Wait until it's you...If you allow this to stand, it will not be long.

Look at CSPAN, hell look at any public discourse. These things happen everyday. Is it right? No, of course not, but you did not see Barbara Boxer being manhandled for going over her alloted time in questioning Petraeus.

He disrupted. As you say, people "disrupt" all the time and sometimes get bopped. He got bopped. Maybe over-bopped. However, he's such a loudmouthed asshole, I don't care. He overacted - Help! Help! I actually laughed right out loud at him.

I think you are over-reacting. This was not a free speech issue. This is a loud-mouthed asshole issue combined with a university cops issue (how many of us have had run-ins with a Barney Fife college cop? I know I have.) He had a chance to ask a question, started a monologue, was asked to stop, didn't, acted like an asshole, and got bopped.

295 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:53:42am

re: #285 Hard Right

Does a Tazer cause lasting harm?

I'm not so sure, anymore.

A high voltage electrical charge will pass through any moist path in the body (think veins, nerves, bone marrow).

If it is of a high frequency, then it *might* pass along the skin, but then you wouldn't get the effect of it debilitating the muscles (like it is designed to do).

When electricity goes through your veins, nerves, marrow or whatever, it burns that path up (that's why electrical burns cause 4th degree burns)

[Link: www.britannica.com...]

Thus, it seems reasonable, that when you are getting tazed, you are getting 4rth degree burns (albeit not for very long and not at the same power).

Still...

~Norsk Troll

296 Indefatigable  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:53:44am

Give him the Taser, heh heh. The Taser, yeah, yeah. The Taser.

/channeling Beavis

297 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:54:40am

re: #293 easy

re: #221 EtNorskTroll

re: #208 easy


You cannot resist the cops. They can use whatever force is necessary. Try it sometime.


Not cops, easy.Security goons personnel.

~ENT

University of Florida Police Department

MMMmmm...I didn't know that.

~Norsk Troll

298 wee fury  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:55:00am

Well, what I see in the video is a 21 year old who thinks the world is all about "me, me, me, me, me."
He doesn't respect the rules (time limit), the repeated requests for him to sit down, nor the requests from law enforcement.
This was no simple 'bad manners' -- it was complete disregard for the requests of authority figures.
Law enforcement made the correct decision.

299 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:55:39am

re: #294 Cattt

Cattt, by the time he was detained by the police his questions were over. So why bother detaining and zapping him at that point?

300 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:56:55am

re: #279 Geepers

Please pardon my apparent ignorance in this matter, but could someone please define: "Moby"

301 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:57:22am

Hawk59,

Sorry Real, and with all due respect, not only do I believe you are allowed to resist a plainly unlawful arrest,

Someone who "believes" what is right and wrong trumps what the law is.

A strange inconsistency there for a "conservative."

302 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:57:24am

re: #286 MadRat

Here's how it actually happened (from BoingBoing)...




I couldn't get to my camera in time to record his entrance, but this guy basically comes running in with 4 or 5 cops in tow and says he has been running around trying to get in to ask a question and the cops are going to arrest him for it. They almost do it then but Sen. Kerry says he will answer it. He then answers a previous question someone else asked (I cut that part out because it isn't important to this video) then the guy asks his questions and when he is done all hell breaks lose. To the cop haters: I have no doubt the cops were going exactly by the book, the problem isn't them, its the book! they were doing their job and looked just as confused as this kid (This isn't something that they deal with often).



As the kid writhes on the ground screaming for mercy, Kerry drones on in his school-principal-on-thorazine style.


How did CNN Headline "News" spin it? They show scenes of the guy just as he's finishing taking then the scenes of him being attacked by people in uniform, then cut to him screaming over and over "I didn't do anything! I didn't do anything!"

There's no mention that the "police" were campus security, no footage of the guy running into the room while being chased by security, no video of him shouting like a lunatic at one of the highest ranking public officials in the federal government about how Kerry actually won the election and no shots of security calmly standing behind him during his rant. Did CNN Headline mention of the killing of Robert Kennedy or John Kennedy, the nearly fatal shooting of Ronald Regan or the shots fired at Gerald Ford? No. Did they mention that the guy was still screaming his head off long AFTER he was tased and thus trying to play up what was happening as much as possible? No.

Already CNN's starting to back peddle on the story showing interviews of witnesses saying, "Yeah the cops were justified in what they did," and another saying, "This was really brutal."

If that's how it went down, then I'm fine with the actions of the security/police.

I simply have a problem with words directed at a politician ending with physical force, no matter how distasteful or even crazy the words are.

303 sandspur  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:58:09am

re: #192 Geepers

re: #192 Geepers

RTLM (#67),

Thanks for the link.

"There are people that know I'm here. You can't just like, kill me."

"Oh my god. You're giving me to the government, They're giving me to the government. They're giving me to the government."

"I don't want to give you that. [his name] I'm afraid. I'm not telling you anything."

"Everyone that was here today please go to the police station. Ask them where's the guy that was at the protest. Because They're going to try to kill me. They are going to try to kill me."

This guy needs a serious psych evaluation.


He might need some electro-shock therapy

304 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:58:58am

re: #285 Hard Right


Jeez. I don't blame you. I admit I was not aware of LAPD doing that. However, that is different from tazering as that caused lasting physical harm. Not to mention he wasn't resisting non-violently.


HERE: [Link: xo.typepad.com...]

Only watch this if you haven't already eaten.

It will sicken you.

The LAPD: Vicious thugs.

Vicious animals.

~Norsk Troll

305 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:59:17am

re: #287 Hawk59 And as I said, YOU are not the one to determine whether or not it was a lawful arrest . That particular fight should be fought in the courtroom.
When a cop (or lawfully designated Security Guard) asks you, respectfully, to stop talking and leave the auditorium and you say no, then physically resist them, I believe those two officers had the obligation to physically take him out of the auditiorium. The addition of other security guards was directly cause by his refusal to go with the first two security guards in the first place and to resist their lawful request to leave the auditorium. Hell, I'd come out of retirement to represent those security guards.

306 jayzee  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:59:44am

re: #299 BLBfootballs

They didn't zap him for talking. They zapped him for resisting them physically when they asked him to stop. This is NOT a free speech issue at all. This is a behavior issue. As I said above though, only a more thorough investigation will determine whether or not the police response was appropriate in regards to the use of the taser.

307 RickZ  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:59:45am

Stupid is as stupid does. And, boy oh boy, talk about stupid.

I agree with the above comment as to how Meyer has probably never been told no, and could not grasp the concept. As in, "How dare you tell me no? Don't you know who I am?"

I also agree he needs a psych evaluation. A 24 hour hold, at least. He's clearly off his rocker and deep into conspiracies.

Also, since this was a school event that Meyer disrupted, shouldn't the school sanction the poor little tasered one in some manner?

308 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:00:01am

Dern! I think ya'll tuckered out the band width!

309 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:00:14am

re: #299 BLBfootballs

re: #294 Cattt

Cattt, by the time he was detained by the police his questions were over. So why bother detaining and zapping him at that point?

Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike; and these were Barney Fife college cops (no offense to non-Barney Fife college cops). I'm not going to post an armchair quarterback on what the cops did and should have done. I just noticed the guy was a freaking asshole, so I don't care. Call me callous.

310 ts.atomic  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:00:39am

Narcissistic-attention-wh0r3 creates a public disturbance; ignores the massive clue that he is no longer welcome on the premesis when the LEO's initially lay hands on him; continues to flail after being told not to do so; gets zapped.

Um... Where's the story?

Better yet, what happened to the common-sense those protesting this incident (presumably) once had?

Bottom line: Cops lay hands on you for whatever reason and you begin to flail about with clenched fists (see the video), you automatically forfeit the right *not* to get cuffed & stuffed. If you refuse to comply, then you invite most any means of non-lethal force that will gain the sought after compliance. After you are processed, then you get to stand on a soap-box of your own making, with or without a lawyer -- generally, not before processing (politicians notwithstanding)...

The guy could have walked out of there and made plenty of hay in his college newspaper, blog, whatever. But, as I mentioned before, "Narcissistic-attention-wh0r3". Nuff said.

Opinions may vary, but as far as I can see and read, he made his own choices and determined his own fate. Too bad the cops will quite likely be punished in some fashion, purely as sacrificial lambs to grease the squeaky wheels on the left.

311 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:01:49am

re: #300 Hawk59

see
[Link: lgfdictionary.wordpress.com...]

312 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:02:24am

BLBfootballs says:

What if this guy was a right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions--would it have been alright for the cops to detain and taser the guy then?

Oh brother.

313 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:03:01am

re: #301 Geepers

Curiously and "as a conservative", I do not find it at all inconsistent with the principles of the party of less government and rugged individualism, to believe that when you KNOW (note the lack of "belief") that you have not committed a CRIME, that you have a duty to resist the CRIME being perpetrated against you.

Perhaps these are the views of old conservatives, like myself, and I am out of place.

314 realwest  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:03:11am

re: #312 Geepers Yep. I reckon that's the end of this thread for me!

315 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:03:17am

re: #297 EtNorskTroll

re: #293 easy

re: #221 EtNorskTroll

re: #208 easy


You cannot resist the cops. They can use whatever force is necessary. Try it sometime.


Not cops, easy.Security goons personnel.

~ENT

University of Florida Police Department

MMMmmm...I didn't know that.

~Norsk Troll

That makes it MUCH worse, IMHO.

I could have excused the security personnel for not having proper training.

There is no excuse for this behaviour.

~Norsk Troll

316 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:03:52am

re: #312 Geepers

BLBfootballs says:

What if this guy was a right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions--would it have been alright for the cops to detain and taser the guy then?

Oh brother.

Seriously, you have no other comment on that scenario?

Like I said, if the idiot was causing a ruckus before he even started asking his "questions," then I'm fine with how it went down.

317 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:04:13am

re: #275 Sizzlack

re: #270 Hard Right

Im not defending the guy or feel any sympathy for him...a few of my earlier posts in this thread clearly show that. However, he was not a security threat to Kerry or anyone else...just a loon with a loud mouth. He deserved what he got, thats what happens when you resist arrest.

My apologies for misunderstanding. It's hard to read all the posts when at work. As far as security threat, that isn't really known until after the fact. He could have been nothing more than a nut, or he could have been diversion while the real threat moved in on the target. Not to mention you can't always tell what weapon(s) a person has by just looking at them.
Lastly, the rules these days say that if you fail to comply you'll probably get Tazered.

My apologies to my fellow lizards for my more forceful than intended replies. After watching police officers get bashed for anything and everything I'm more sensitive to it than I realized.

318 sandspur  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:05:03am

re: #230 Eagle

re: #188 Thanos

Thanks. I used to love reading those books as a boy.

Did someone say Tom Swift? he asked quickly.

Oh wait, that's Tom Swiftie

319 ArmyAunt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:05:37am

re: #7 MandyManners

Best comment of the day!

320 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:05:55am

re: #309 Cattt

Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike;

If you watch the video it's clear that his question ended with the words "...same secret society?" He then stopped speaking and the police moved up to arrest him.

321 lostlakehiker  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:07:12am

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

The guy had indeed been resisting arrest. He earned the arrest by disrupting the meeting. He was pretty big and pretty strong. So---what is the appropriate level of force?

Any sort of force can cause injuries. If they tackle him to the ground and all sit on him, he could get a sprain or worse. The taser inflicts no lasting injury---this guy doesn't have a heart condition, I reckon. He's better off being tasered than being subdued by low-tech means.

There's another consideration. What if he's a distraction, and the main event is waiting in the wings? The cops need to get back to their main duty of providing security.

This is a tempest in a teapot, if the law and the guy can see it. Downgrade the charges to disorderly conduct, grant that the cops were within the letter of their rights, never mind if they used the very best possible judgment, and MoveOn.

322 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:08:55am

Another thought...

Cary and his ilk are, in large part, responsible for nurturing unhinged thought processes like those displayed by the idiot in question, so isn't he compelled to defend such behavior?

Hypocrisy and political expediency, thy name is "liberalism."

323 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:09:05am

re: #304 EtNorskTroll

re: #285 Hard Right


Jeez. I don't blame you. I admit I was not aware of LAPD doing that. However, that is different from tazering as that caused lasting physical harm. Not to mention he wasn't resisting non-violently.


HERE: [Link: xo.typepad.com...]

Only watch this if you haven't already eaten.

It will sicken you.

The LAPD: Vicious thugs.

Vicious animals.

~Norsk Troll

Didn't watch it. Don't need to. Your word is enough for me.

324 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:09:26am

#310 ts.atomic 9/18/07 11:00:39 am

Bottom line: Cops lay hands on you for whatever reason and you begin to flail about with clenched fists (see the video), you automatically forfeit the right *not* to get cuffed & stuffed.

Absolutely so.

In college, I was once targeted, followed around, and ordered to produce ID (though I had done nothing wrong whatsoever) purely because the cop thought I was black (I'm not, but sometimes people think I am; sometimes people think I'm Native American also). I kept my big white mouth shut while he did his racist thing. It was over in a couple minutes. Black friends of mine were also harrassed by the local cops. If you opened your mouth at them, they had you right there. Keep in mind this was a small rural area in the 70s, and the area had very few black people in the actual community.

You gotta know when to hold 'em.

325 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:10:43am

re: #146 Eagle

BTW,

TASER ===

Thomas
A
Swift
Electric
Rifle

And now you know.

An old guy I used to know (he was born in 1906) grew up reading Tom Swift stories. So you know they go back a ways. He also knew some bawdy songs from the teens and '20s, like the one about "Lulu".

326 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:12:02am

TeamDub (#316),

I made no comment on that because this has absolutely nothing to do with what question was being asked.

327 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:12:39am

The video links at the Gainesville Sun are no longer good.

328 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:13:12am

re: #326 Geepers

TeamDub (#316),

I made no comment on that because this has absolutely nothing to do with what question was being asked.

I would suggest that "oh brother" is a comment, but why quibble.

329 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:13:19am

I'd like to see Helen Thomas get tasered. Or David Gregory.

330 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:13:27am

re: #320 BLBfootballs

re: #309 Cattt


Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike;

If you watch the video it's clear that his question ended with the words "...same secret society?" He then stopped speaking and the police moved up to arrest him.

He also said that he had more questions. He had to breathe, is my opinion.

331 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:13:58am

re: #279 Geepers

Hawk59 says:

As a conservative,...

The first tell tale signs of a moby.

Sorry, I only slightly modified a post I made somewhere else (a newspaper site) and reposted it here. Perhaps pointing out my conservatism was a bit superfluous here. I should have edited my comment better.
I do make inflammatory comments at times, but you may rest assured that I am indeed, quite conservative. Not that it matters to this discussion, but a secular conservative.

332 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:14:04am

re: #312 Geepers

BLBfootballs says:

What if this guy was a right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions--would it have been alright for the cops to detain and taser the guy then?

Oh brother.

Geepers, I mean that question quite seriously. I want the limits of free speech in America to be defined by social decency and expectations, not police desires. People should be free to question politicians in public about alleged deceptions. The fact that the questioner in this case is a wacky moonbat-type is not relevant to the issue.

re: #317 Hard Right

I empathize and agree with you--the cops need to be given some latitude to keep people safe and arrest evildoers.

333 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:14:25am

re: #329 Ward Cleaver


Sober or drunk?

334 Silhouette  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:14:43am

One could also ask why bother resisting the officers when he is finished talking. What more did he wish to do in the auditorium that he didn't want to leave?

As an officer tasked with protecting Kerry, I would be wondering that.

335 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:15:09am

re: #320 BLBfootballs

re: #309 Cattt


Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike;

If you watch the video it's clear that his question ended with the words "...same secret society?" He then stopped speaking and the police moved up to arrest him.

He was supposed to ask ONE question. A special consideration was made for him and he abused it.

336 jayzee  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:16:19am

re: #320 BLBfootballs

Because he violated the rules. Universities govern where and how speech can be made. Some challenge this, but so far, the rules remain in tact.

337 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:16:28am

re: #267 EtNorskTroll

What protest, and where exactly did this happen? "The 80's" doesn't really help.

I'm from Southern California, and I cannot remember any such incident.

338 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:16:34am

re: #277 EtNorskTroll

re: #258 BODYGUARDEAGLE

re: #232 EtNorskTroll

ANYONE WHO HAS WORKED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, has experienced an individual like this guy, and knows the type of situation it can evolve into if not stopped immediately. Therefore it does seem justified to use the Taser. IMHO

BODYGUARDEAGLE

With 6 guys on top of him?

Did you see the same video that I saw, Body?

When he's down on the ground, you put away the weapons (unless he still has one).

A tazer is a weapon...it's not a 'persuader'

What are your thoughts: is a tazer a weapon to you, or a tool to get people to do what you want them to do?

/just askin'...

(I think I might be getting to the bottom of this)

~Norsk


***
***
Norsk,
Go and check the other video links that have just recently been put up by other posters. This guy has indicated by his actions that he is argumentative and somewhat of a resistor already, by not accepting that he couldn't ask his questions before time ran out. He was outside came in with Security in tow, rushed the mic. and was allowed to ask his question, then when his mic was turned off, he got louder and was becoming agitated, at which time Security stepped forward to ask him to leave when he pulled away being more resistful, then...we... you know the rest.
AS FOR YOUR QUESTION: Taser? NOT a WEAPON...IT IS a piece of NON-LETHAL equipment to be used primarily to subdue unruly or combative persons...same as handcuffs used to stabilize or control an out of control situation or person.

339 sandspur  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:17:41am

The guards shouldn't have tasered the guy. They should have pulled his pants down, bent him over a chair, paddled his ass with somebody's flip-flop. Then put him in a corner to suck his thumb and think about showing some respect for the speaker, his fellow students, and the University.

340 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:17:53am

Hawk59 says:

Perhaps these are the views of old conservatives, like myself, and I am out of place.

Or perhaps, someone who has to repeatedly tell us that they are a "conservative" isn't.

341 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:18:19am

re: #339 sandspur

The guards shouldn't have tasered the guy. They should have pulled his pants down, bent him over a chair, paddled his ass with somebody's flip-flop. Then put him in a corner to suck his thumb and think about showing some respect for the speaker, his fellow students, and the University.

Heh, I like your solution.

342 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:18:59am

You a tad paranoid Geepers?

Sheesh.

343 sandspur  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:19:50am

re: #341 TeamDub

I was raised in Florida, that's the way we (used to) roll.

344 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:20:15am

re: #332 BLBfootballs

re: #312 Geepers


BLBfootballs says:

What if this guy was a right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions--would it have been alright for the cops to detain and taser the guy then?

Oh brother.

Geepers, I mean that question quite seriously. I want the limits of free speech in America to be defined by social decency and expectations, not police desires. People should be free to question politicians in public about alleged deceptions. The fact that the questioner in this case is a wacky moonbat-type is not relevant to the issue.

re: #317 Hard Right

I empathize and agree with you--the cops need to be given some latitude to keep people safe and arrest evildoers.

I think we are all on the same page with free speech. I think the real questionis should a single moonbat or deliberate trouble maker be allowed to monopolize/disrupt the Q&A session? What should be done when they do such a thing?

345 brogers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:20:20am

I attend UF.

This guy used to write for the campus paper, he wrote some pretty nutty stuff (might be able to find it if the Alligator has an archive). His behavior at the speech confirms he's a moron.

However, the University Police could have handled the situation in a much better fashion. He never presented a threat to anyone, and the taser was excessive, especially when you consider the position he was in--lying on the ground with one hand already handcuffed, and pinned by 4 cops. I think they should have just thrown him the back of a cop car until the speech was over then turned him loose so he could further make a fool of himself. Because of the escalation by the UPD, tax and tuition dollars will be wasted to throw this idiot in jail, for court costs, and to handle the massive amount of bad publicity this has created. No one was protecteed by their actions, the audience was indeed more terrified by the police response than by his questions... Not condoning the behavior, but I think the police response was indeed excessive.

And those commenting he "deserved" being tased, have probably never experienced the pain of the device, and should perhaps think before wishing such pain upon others, no matter how stupid they act. Being a retard doesn't mean you deserve to be electrocuted.

346 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:20:33am

re: #342 TeamDub

No, Geepers is used to seeing patterns.

347 kingronjo  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:21:06am

I can't believe what I am reading here. The lack of understanding is beyond belief.

First, I am quite sure that the people working as security guards couldn't give two shakes of a rats ass what this guy was saying. And if they did, as employees of a large University (which my daughter attends btw) they are probably left of center if one is to generalize. Much like some are generalizing that he was shut up for what he was saying, slippery slope, yada, yada.

This guy was not tasered for his point of view, this guy was tasered because he was refusing to comply with a lawful directive from duly authorized security personnel. That my friends, is the slippery slope. If anyone can disregard any order just by saying, "I was exercising my free speech and I wasn't done yet" imagine the chaos that would entail.

Example, I am in the House of Representatives gallery and I choose to get up in my pink hat and scream at a four star General, "YOU ARE A TRAITOR!' over and over. The police come over and ask me if I am done yet. I say no and they are forced to keep step aside until I inform them I am done.

No, this punk deserves what he got and for anyone to argue that it was based upon the content of his speech and not his actions is in serious denial.

348 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:21:35am

re: #346 Roger

re: #342 TeamDub

No, Geepers is used to seeing patterns.

Rorschach?

349 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:21:48am

333 Roger

Both. I want a two-fer.

350 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:22:38am

re: #341 TeamDub

re: #339 sandspur


The guards shouldn't have tasered the guy. They should have pulled his pants down, bent him over a chair, paddled his ass with somebody's flip-flop. Then put him in a corner to suck his thumb and think about showing some respect for the speaker, his fellow students, and the University.

Heh, I like your solution.

That would make a great youtube video.

351 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:23:19am

re: #340 Geepers

Allright, Geepers, I have tried to keep it civil with you and explain why I said what I said, but you are apparently just going to be unreasonable. So, have a nice day. (note, I wont have you tasered for your unruliness though). Believe as you will.

352 abefromen  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:24:07am

I guarantee it would not have gone this far if that large Sgt. from the end of the video was one of the first to arrive on scene, I think Looney Moonie took advantage of the two female officers who were clearly over matched, that being said, enough warnings were given before 'taz' shocked the hell out of him.

Personally my favorite moment was when Moonie screamed

people know i'm here, you can't kill me!
353 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:24:26am
#351 Hawk59

Believe as you will.

Guess what? We don't need your permission.

354 RickZ  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:24:54am

re: #344 Hard Right

I think the real questionis should a single moonbat or deliberate trouble maker be allowed to monopolize/disrupt the Q&A session? What should be done when they do such a thing?

I suggest we bring back the stocks. And bushels of rotten vegetables nearby. Oh, the public humiliation. Which in this moron's case, and other morons like him, would be a good thing.

355 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:25:20am

re: #353 Cattt

Oooohhh, don't anger the herd Hawk!

356 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:25:27am

#351 Hawk59

Now that sounds very moby-ish.

357 TeamDub  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:26:27am

Alright, this is starting to feel a little "kossian" for me, have a good day y'all.

358 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:26:59am

re: #348 TeamDub

No, in posting style and potential disingenuity.

359 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:27:03am

BLBfootballs (#332),

The fact that the questioner in this case is a wacky moonbat-type is not relevant to the issue.

No it's not.

Thus, using your line of reasoning, neither would a "right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions" be relevant. Yet, you interjected that specious "argument" yourself.

Don't play us for fools.

360 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:27:11am

re: #352 abefromen

I guarantee it would not have gone this far if that large Sgt. from the end of the video was one of the first to arrive on scene, I think Looney Moonie took advantage of the two female officers who were clearly over matched, that being said, enough warnings were given before 'taz' shocked the hell out of him.

Personally my favorite moment was when Moonie screamed

people know i'm here, you can't kill me!

He was definitly a bit "touched", wasn't he.

361 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:27:26am

re: #347 kingronjo

I can't believe what I am reading here. The lack of understanding is beyond belief.

First, I am quite sure that the people working as security guards couldn't give two shakes of a rats ass what this guy was saying. And if they did, as employees of a large University (which my daughter attends btw) they are probably left of center if one is to generalize. Much like some are generalizing that he was shut up for what he was saying, slippery slope, yada, yada.

This guy was not tasered for his point of view, this guy was tasered because he was refusing to comply with a lawful directive from duly authorized security personnel. That my friends, is the slippery slope. If anyone can disregard any order just by saying, "I was exercising my free speech and I wasn't done yet" imagine the chaos that would entail.

Example, I am in the House of Representatives gallery and I choose to get up in my pink hat and scream at a four star General, "YOU ARE A TRAITOR!' over and over. The police come over and ask me if I am done yet. I say no and they are forced to keep step aside until I inform them I am done.

No, this punk deserves what he got and for anyone to argue that it was based upon the content of his speech and not his actions is in serious denial.

Exactly the point I think some here have missed.

362 mattm  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:27:43am

Must have been a shocking experience to see Kerry speak.
/couldn't resit

Now, if this happened at Republican speech, the MSM would be all over it. Breaking into normally scheduled programming, asking ACLu experts...

363 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:28:07am

re: #347 kingronjo

I can't believe what I am reading here. The lack of understanding is beyond belief...

This guy was not tasered for his point of view, this guy was tasered because he was refusing to comply with a lawful directive from duly authorized security personnel. That my friends, is the slippery slope. If anyone can disregard any order just by saying, "I was exercising my free speech and I wasn't done yet" imagine the chaos that would entail.

Example, I am in the House of Representatives gallery and I choose to get up in my pink hat and scream at a four star General, "YOU ARE A TRAITOR!' over and over. The police come over and ask me if I am done yet. I say no and they are forced to keep step aside until I inform them I am done.

No, this punk deserves what he got and for anyone to argue that it was based upon the content of his speech and not his actions is in serious denial.

Kingronjo, that not a great example if you want to talk about law. In the Congressional gallery viewers have no right to speak or become involved in the proceedings whatsoever. It's very different when you're in the Q&A session of a public speech.

364 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:28:10am

re: #304 EtNorskTroll

That is a propaganda video; if this took place in 1989, I never heard of it, my brother never mentioned it (lived in LA at the time; born again; not much for protesting, but definitely would have repeated the story to me if he'd heard it), and the video is, to put it mildly, unclear.

Where is the lawsuit?

365 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:29:33am

re: #337 Dianna

re: #267 EtNorskTroll

What protest, and where exactly did this happen? "The 80's" doesn't really help.

I'm from Southern California, and I cannot remember any such incident.

Here's some video of it, Dianna:

[Link: xo.typepad.com...]

~Norsk Troll

366 filetandrelease  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:30:56am

Student body is now demanding removal of tasers from campus. (just on CNN)

367 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:31:14am

re: #364 Dianna

re: #304 EtNorskTroll

That is a propaganda video; if this took place in 1989, I never heard of it, my brother never mentioned it (lived in LA at the time; born again; not much for protesting, but definitely would have repeated the story to me if he'd heard it), and the video is, to put it mildly, unclear.

Where is the lawsuit?

I never heard of a lawsuit being filed. Was one filed?

How can it be a propaganda video when I remember it, there is a record of it, and protesters were injured at it?

?

*puzzled*

~Norsk Troll

368 mad_scientist  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:31:38am
agree with you, BUT, THIS MAN HAS THE RIGHT to speak

He did speak, now if he would have stopped and asked a question and let Kerry answer, and BE CIVIL about it, instead ranting like a junkie on crystal meth, then I would feel the same.

He asked questions, but refused the right of Kerry to answer. He kept spouting off on everything from impeachment, to diebold voting machines counting backwards, about studies that said kerry won the election, blah blah blah...one moonbat thing after another...

I am a proponent of free speech, even if it is total moonbattery. But this moonbat couldnt contain himself...he was asked repeatedly to let Kerry answer, and when it became clear that the asshat would not shut up, his mic was shut off. That would be standard practice at any debate...

Think about it...if you are in a public forum, a debate, how long do you give a rambling incoherent asshole the right to talk over you, who are the person the people came there see? They game him plenty of time, and a lot of chances to cease the escalation...and my guess is that if the mic wasnt cut, this clown would have kept on with his mindless drone for about an hour before even allowing the slightest chance for Kerry to respond.

I dislike Kerry, loathe him actually, but there was nothing wrong with what the security team did...this guy was a frothing lunatic.

Like I said in a previous post...how do we know what was going on in that scrum...this asshat could have been trying to punch his way out, maybe even reach for a weapon or tazer on one of the guards, and with than many people tying to pull at him and bend his arm, he could have broken an arm or been seriously hurt...he was tazed, immobilized, and escorted off the premisis...none the worse for ware...except for that painful jolt, of course...maybe next time he wont be such a f'ing lunatic.

369 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:34:39am

re: #359 Geepers

BLBfootballs (#332),

The fact that the questioner in this case is a wacky moonbat-type is not relevant to the issue.

No it's not.

Thus, using your line of reasoning, neither would a "right winger asking Kerry about his Swift Boat deceptions" be relevant. Yet, you interjected that specious "argument" yourself.

That's correct. IMO both types of questioners should have the right to ask their questions. I bring the Swift Boat example to illustrate the value of allowing irritating questions to be posed to politicians in public. Considering the more rightist nature of the LGF lizardsphere I think that example resonates. Don't get why you think it's "specious".

Don't play us for fools.

I really don't know what that's supposed to mean.

370 southernborn  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:35:05am

You know, parents do their kids a disservice by making them believe they can always get their way with their tantrums. send them out there in the world where mommy has no say so to get their lil Arses kicked and that's just what they deserve. Just as this punk deserved.

371 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:36:55am

Note: no one can operate a taser unless they've been on the receiving end during training. Them's the rules. They know exactly what they are doing having experienced it themselves.

372 ts.atomic  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:37:42am

re: #5 yah
"...How come nobody used a taser on code pink protesters at congress last week?..."

I'll go out on a limb and guess that the reason the "Code Pink" protester's at the Petraeus briefing escaped tasering (or whatever) is because they were simply noisy, ugly, out of line and they generally complied and frog-marched when led by the arms without too much undue fuss. They weren't male (pure speculation on my part); over 6 feet and flailing about with clenched fists while successfully breaking free a time or two.

Seems to me the "pinko's" were somewhat aware of what they could and could not get away with before experiencing any number of pain/compliance techniques.

Just guessin'

373 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:37:47am

re: #366 filetandrelease

Student body is now demanding removal of tasers from campus. (just on CNN)

Oh, please! For goodness sake! THIS is what happens when overweening cops intercept off-kilter moonbats!

374 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:38:10am

re: #371 Roger

Note: no one can operate a taser unless they've been on the receiving end during training. Them's the rules. They know exactly what they are doing having experienced it themselves.

That's true...

Question is: do they all remember what it felt like?

~Norsk Troll

375 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:38:54am

re: #355 TeamDub

re: #353 Cattt

Oooohhh, don't anger the herd Hawk!

No kidding! Ouch. Some folks here are just as unflexible and dogmatic as those we detest on the left.

Cattt Said:
"We dont need your permission".

Ahem...How mature (and obvious) of you.

Look, I simply posted a comment on the article stating my beliefs. Sorry some of you dont agree with them, but I did not attack any of you personally. Somehow though, my comments made you uncomfortable enough in your smug dogmatic beliefs that you felt it appropriate to attack me. That is neither appropriate nor mature.

376 BLBfootballs  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:40:12am

re: #371 Roger

Note: no one can operate a taser unless they've been on the receiving end during training. Them's the rules. They know exactly what they are doing having experienced it themselves.

I had not known that. That's an admirable standard.

377 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:42:13am

re: #375 Hawk59

Who's the we? Got a mouse...

378 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:42:31am

re: #375 Hawk59

I agree with Hawk.

It was not called for, Cattt.

You should apologize.
It's the right thing to do.

~Norsk Troll

379 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:42:58am

re: #377 Roger

re: #375 Hawk59

Who's the we? Got a mouse...

That would be me, Roger.

~Norsk Troll

380 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:43:17am

re: #367 EtNorskTroll

1) I don't know you from Adam, so I can't possibly know what you remember and what you don't.

2) No propaganda film, even if it agrees with one's own views, is to be trusted. 2a) That particular film is blurry; 2b) I cannot tell by what's shown that its account is accurate.

3) What record of the event? That film, I repeat, is propaganda.

381 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:43:38am

re: #370 southernborn

You know, parents do their kids a disservice by making them believe they can always get their way with their tantrums. send them out there in the world where mommy has no say so to get their lil Arses kicked and that's just what they deserve. Just as this punk deserved.

***
***

Hmmm...YEP, I finally realized what you say is true, after all the years of MOM and DAD (CHIEF OF POLICE) whipping my butt for little tantrums, not minding or acting unruly in public, when I finally grew up and saw others children get away with everything when little brats...and saw the same kids when they were grown and looked back at their lives full of trouble and disgrace.

382 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:43:54am

#375 Hawk59

"attack you personally..."

You must have missed the Friday/massacre drunken threads. Aw, those were the days. I'm gettin misty here.

My friend, this is a sunny afternoon discussion among friends.

There are a lot of folks who disagree with you and ETNorsk, and there are also a lot of folks who agree with you.

I happen to disagree with you.

'Nothin to it.

383 Geepers  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:44:59am
No kidding! Ouch. Some folks here are just as unflexible and dogmatic as those we detest on the left.

Ofergodsakes.

384 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:45:49am

#378 EtNorskTroll

Cattt apologize? Nonsense.

As soon as someone starts jogging up the moral superiority high-ground my BS alarm goes off.

It's going off right now.

385 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:45:49am

re: #379 EtNorskTroll

me is not we yet many folks get them confused.

386 jayzee  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:46:21am

re: #363 BLBfootballs

re: #347 kingronjo


I can't believe what I am reading here. The lack of understanding is beyond belief...

This guy was not tasered for his point of view, this guy was tasered because he was refusing to comply with a lawful directive from duly authorized security personnel. That my friends, is the slippery slope. If anyone can disregard any order just by saying, "I was exercising my free speech and I wasn't done yet" imagine the chaos that would entail.

Example, I am in the House of Representatives gallery and I choose to get up in my pink hat and scream at a four star General, "YOU ARE A TRAITOR!' over and over. The police come over and ask me if I am done yet. I say no and they are forced to keep step aside until I inform them I am done.

No, this punk deserves what he got and for anyone to argue that it was based upon the content of his speech and not his actions is in serious denial.


Kingronjo, that not a great example if you want to talk about law. In the Congressional gallery viewers have no right to speak or become involved in the proceedings whatsoever. It's very different when you're in the Q&A session of a public speech.

Actually you are wrong. Check out section J.

387 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:47:01am

re: #376 BLBfootballs

re: #371 Roger

Note: no one can operate a taser unless they've been on the receiving end during training. Them's the rules. They know exactly what they are doing having experienced it themselves.

I had not known that. That's an admirable standard.

***
***
IT isn't a pleasant experience either... IT WILL INCAPACITATE YOU, and in some cases such as mine,...leave two little scars...

388 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:47:12am

re: #367 EtNorskTroll

A point I forgot:

and protesters were injured at it?


If protesters were injured by the police, while resisting non-violently, there would be a lawsuit. There would have been hearings by the police commission. There would have been a number of subsequent actions. Yes, there would be a whole lot of noise and legal action!

389 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:48:41am

#387 BODYGUARDEAGLE

"It will leave scars..."

Shoot, as Keanuu Reeves said in a forgettable movie, "Chicks dig scars...!"

Can't argue with that logic.

390 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:48:58am

re: #385 Roger

re: #379 EtNorskTroll

me is not we yet many folks get them confused.

I meant he and I.

You're right.

391 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:54:06am

re: #366 filetandrelease

Student body is now demanding removal of tasers from campus. (just on CNN)

Translation: Mostly moonbats who fear that they could be made to comply with the rules, want them gone. Can't interrupt "Rethuglican" speeches when being tazered.

392 Rich7041  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:54:39am

I've been on the job in Jersey for 28 years. Unfortunately, tasers, stun guns, etc., are outlawed here. Even for the Good Guys. Anybody who refuses to be handcuffed, regardless of size, can be a real handful. I don't envy the men & women on that detail, being in full public view and subject to the usual Monday Morning quarterbacking. I was taught (many years ago) that when someone resists you, fight as though you believe he intends to take your firearm and use it on you. He would have gotten alot worse here than just a little zapping. And deserved it, too. I'm just sayin' is all.

393 zandtar  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:55:43am

re: #366 filetandrelease

Student body is now demanding removal of tasers from campus. (just on CNN)

[Link: www.roanoke.com...]

"I'm sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly's actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus."

394 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:55:46am

re: #388 Dianna

re: #367 EtNorskTroll

A point I forgot:


and protesters were injured at it?

If protesters were injured by the police, while resisting non-violently, there would be a lawsuit. There would have been hearings by the police commission. There would have been a number of subsequent actions. Yes, there would be a whole lot of noise and legal action!

So a bunch of pro-life protestors injured by police would get widespread media coverage from a hostile leftwing press in 1989? I think not.

395 BulgarWheat  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:56:37am

I see that this thread is slowly losing steam. Probably a good thing.

Nothing more than a nice, vigorous discussion. If someone's feelings got hurt, you don't want to come to Thanksgiving at my house!

396 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:56:53am

re: #388 Dianna

re: #367 EtNorskTroll

A point I forgot:

and protesters were injured at it?


If protesters were injured by the police, while resisting non-violently, there would be a lawsuit. There would have been hearings by the police commission. There would have been a number of subsequent actions. Yes, there would be a whole lot of noise and legal action!

Dianna~

Please see these links:

[Link: www-swiss.ai.mit.edu...]

[Link: www.stoptheaclu.com...]

1990: ACLU of Southern California files a brief supporting Operation Rescue's appeal of a federal judge's ruling upholding the use of "pain compliance" techniques by L.A. police: [Link: midtopia.blogspot.com...]

[Link: www.trageser.com...]

[Link: www.mediaresearch.org...]

In that case, the United States Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the city, saying officers were operating within their legal rights when they used nonchakus -- two sticks of wood connected at one end by a cord and used to grip demonstrators' wrists -- and direct physical contact such as pushing on facial pressure points to remove nonviolent protesters from a medical clinic. All of the demonstrators arrested complained of varying degrees of injury to their hands and arms, including bruises, a pinched nerve and one broken wrist, according to the court's 1994 decision.: [Link: www.northcoastjournal.com...]

[Link: www.cjlf.org...]


Let me know if you need more.

How long did you say you've lived in Los Angeles?

~Norsk Troll

397 Dirk Diggler  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:57:13am
No kidding! Ouch. Some folks here are just as unflexible and dogmatic as those we detest on the left.

Ofergodsakes.

I agree with Geepers. For someone who isn't a Moby you're sure acting like one.

I could be wrong, but for I've been here for over five years and have seen my share of them.

398 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:59:20am

re: #389 BulgarWheat

#387 BODYGUARDEAGLE

"It will leave scars..."

Shoot, as Keanuu Reeves said in a forgettable movie, "Chicks dig scars...!"

Can't argue with that logic.

***
***
BWAhahahahahahaaa- YES !...now that you mention it...LOL...my girlfriend DID say one time she thought it was cool LOL...I've been Tasered, shot, cut, and hit with many objects, but I do not think any hurt as bad as a mad drunk 6'7 400lb guy 'bulldozing' my 6'1 210 lb frame from behind,...herniating two disc...that has lasted for many years...

(BTW...I occasionally worked as security[bouncer] and had his girlfriend subdued in an arm bar, after her hitting another girl from behind with a beer bottle) sigh...the old days...

399 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:03:02pm

I predict Charles will tase and re-ban some old timers before long.

Seen it coming for a long time now.

400 ArmyAunt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:06:29pm

re: #330 Cattt

re: #320 BLBfootballs


re: #309 Cattt


Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike;

If you watch the video it's clear that his question ended with the words "...same secret society?" He then stopped speaking and the police moved up to arrest him.

He also said that he had more questions. He had to breathe, is my opinion.

That's incorrect.
Watch the guy on the right in a suit. He is signaling (hand drawn across the throat) to cut the mike. He didn't stop speaking, they cut the mike off.

401 rappmandu  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:06:48pm

/

PIMF

402 D'kian_  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:07:36pm

re: #19 Charles

Watch the video -- he did not rush the stage. He did, however, struggle with the police, which is never a great idea.

It's a wider aplication of one of Niven's Laws: "Do not throw s---t at an armed man." And it's corollary: "Do not stand behind someone who's throwing s---t at an armed man."

403 jamgarr  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:08:38pm

re: #375 Hawk59

I'm surprised no one has asked you this yet - when you honor your moral obligation to resist what you have determined to be an unwarranted arrest are the arresting officers allowed to apply the restraint needed to complete the arrest they deem appropriate?

404 Highrise  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:10:25pm

I personally do not care for the taser being used unless a cop thinks their life is in danger and there are a number of tasing incidents prior to this incident that I have raised my eyebrows at. Watching this particular footage, I'm not sure I completely agree that it was appropriate use. HOWEVER...

it isn't something that I would come down on the cops for. People need to realize when they are resisting arrest (you do have to be a bit on the dense side to have 6 cops on your butt and you are still resisting?) that anything can happen..whether that be an accidental discharge of a weapon, broken bones, you get sat on and squeezed to death...etc.

I used to work with Police. It also is hard to tell how strong someone is by footage alone. Yes, there were many cops there, but I also noticed he wiggled out of their grip a lot...hmm...maybe he had vaseline on his body :P or maybe he was high on drugs and was stronger. It will be interesting to see what the investigation comes up with.

405 Maximu§  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:10:39pm

Should'nt this little Punk be studying or working?

At 21 years of age I was carrying an M-16 on the East German border holding the dirty Commies at bay, not making a Fool outta myself in public...I wish he would have gotton a baton upside the head instead of that little taser.

Maximu§
3/11 ACR

406 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:10:48pm
407 Highrise  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:12:59pm

re: #406 buzzsawmonkey

Interesting take, I didn't think about that.

408 aaron's rantblog  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:14:00pm

Getcher commemorative gear, here:

Don't tase me, bro!

409 Rich7041  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:16:13pm

re: #406 Buzz
That's exactly the position the Chiefs' Association takes here. Tasers would prevent brutality, not encourage it. It seems to work in other states. But this state is blue and the defendant's well-being is considered above that of the police. I'm used to it after so long that I don't think about until some a**clown puts on a show like this.

410 rtheyserius  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:16:41pm

Rule #1 for not getting tased: Don't fight the officers.

411 Roger  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:20:24pm

re: #404 Highrise

By the time your criteria is met a police officer could have a shiv slid under their ribs. Can't say to the perp, "Wait!, Let me get my taser and we can start over!" Life should not have to be in danger before tasing; just likely they might given a bad day. Police should have a right to go home from work without going via the hospital all the time.

412 Genexer  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:23:02pm

I could watch that again and again...

413 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:24:42pm

re: #396 EtNorskTroll

I'm reading your links.

I grew up in SoCal. Out in the desert. I moved to Northern California in 81, but my brother went to Azusa Pacific, lived in Venice, Ventura, Simi Valley and Highland while working for Immigration at LAX. He's a born again, church-going guy. My parents still live in Southern California.

414 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:28:22pm

re: #413 Dianna

re: #396 EtNorskTroll

I'm reading your links.

I grew up in SoCal. Out in the desert. I moved to Northern California in 81, but my brother went to Azusa Pacific, lived in Venice, Ventura, Simi Valley and Highland while working for Immigration at LAX. He's a born again, church-going guy. My parents still live in Southern California.

And you NEVER heard of any of this going down?

It was in the LA times almost every week.

A-maz-ing.

Not surprised, though. Lots of stuff went down in my college when I was there and I was oblivious to all of it.

I still get blank looks from some of my college buddies when they mention stuff and I say "what are you talking about...?"

But then again, I was an engineering student. I was busy studying...

~Norsk Troll

415 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:29:59pm

re: #400 ArmyAunt

re: #330 Cattt


re: #320 BLBfootballs

re: #309 Cattt


Two things: his questions were over BECAUSE he was dragged away from the mike;

If you watch the video it's clear that his question ended with the words "...same secret society?" He then stopped speaking and the police moved up to arrest him.

He also said that he had more questions. He had to breathe, is my opinion.

That's incorrect.
Watch the guy on the right in a suit. He is signaling (hand drawn across the throat) to cut the mike. He didn't stop speaking, they cut the mike off.

I think that your reply was to the other poster, but I just want to make it clear that I agree that he did not speaking.

416 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:31:03pm
417 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:32:53pm
418 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:33:15pm

Two six-foot five cops - the old fashioned kind - could have just lifted the guy up and had him out the door. Instead, Mr. Disuptive was literally head and shoulders above the cops - which included at least one woman officer.
Geez, a staffer at Popular Mechanics got zapped to try it out. (Video available at their site). There are worse things than getting a big temporary OW-IE from a tasar. A LOT worse things. Even cops get tasared as part of their training to experience what it does. No one sees anyone suggesting cops practice getting shot, or getting smacked in the head by a nightstick.
The most distinctive thing of the whole scene is the self-absorption of the guy. Totally aware of the eyes on him, the attention on HIM rather than the speaker, the melodramatic howls knowing full well they would be recorded. Drama queen. All about ME.

419 Dianna  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:36:34pm

re: #414 EtNorskTroll

But then again, I was an engineering student. I was busy studying...

Sigh.

Do you know, I don't like that implication, but I'm not going to fight, so I'll just point out that I worked, studied history, and was always on the dean's list. Which didn't keep me from reading the news, or much of anything else.

420 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:38:18pm

re: #418 wanumba

Two six-foot five cops - the old fashioned kind - could have just lifted the guy up and had him out the door. Instead, Mr. Disuptive was literally head and shoulders above the cops - which included at least one woman officer.
Geez, a staffer at Popular Mechanics got zapped to try it out. (Video available at their site). There are worse things than getting a big temporary OW-IE from a tasar. A LOT worse things. Even cops get tasared as part of their training to experience what it does. No one sees anyone suggesting cops practice getting shot, or getting smacked in the head by a nightstick.
The most distinctive thing of the whole scene is the self-absorption of the guy. Totally aware of the eyes on him, the attention on HIM rather than the speaker,

the melodramatic howls knowing full well they would be recorded.

Drama queen. All about ME.

Funny thing, wanumba:

I've been nailed by some pretty high voltage in my lifetime.

Each and every time that I did, I didn't howl. I cleared my throat (think stifled yell).

When you're really getting zapped--and good--you don't yell like this guy.

I think you're right on this assessment...

~Norsk Troll

421 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:38:37pm
422 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:39:32pm

re: #419 Dianna

re: #414 EtNorskTroll

But then again, I was an engineering student. I was busy studying...

Sigh.

Do you know, I don't like that implication, but I'm not going to fight, so I'll just point out that I worked, studied history, and was always on the dean's list. Which didn't keep me from reading the news, or much of anything else.

Didn't mean anything untoward by it. Just telling it like it happened, is all...

*wink*

~ENT

423 Highrise  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:41:06pm

re: #411 Roger

re: #404 Highrise

By the time your criteria is met a police officer could have a shiv slid under their ribs. Can't say to the perp, "Wait!, Let me get my taser and we can start over!" Life should not have to be in danger before tasing; just likely they might given a bad day. Police should have a right to go home from work without going via the hospital all the time.

I don't necessarily disagree. I have an open mind about this, Roger. I would be interested in seeing the investigation report. I also realize that these types of people use vaseline on their body to slip out of police's arms and sometimes they can be on drugs which is hard for even 6 cops to put them under control. That is not always evident in footage, believe me, I know.

The jury is still out imo on how tasers are used in other events. And I think it's ok to question..it keeps everyone in check. Lizards as usual have posts that are actually good on BOTH sides of this argument.

424 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:43:49pm
425 Catttt  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:44:45pm

PIMF - did not STOP speaking. Dang.

426 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:46:09pm

Chris Rock has a primer for all of you who thing it was unecessary.

Chris Rock

427 Highrise  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:46:10pm

re: #420 EtNorskTroll

Boy I know what you mean about engineering degree.

I would stay in lab up till like 9pm at night...and come out and college guys would be playing hacky sack under the lights. I'd shake my head and just wonder...who has that time? I'd have college students hand me flyers to go do things, I looked at them blankly...what is your major I'd say?

LOL.

I was so booked out by the time they got done with me..5 yrs plus summers of college. Do you know it took me years to pick up another book to read for enjoyment again? YEARS!

428 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:49:24pm

re: #427 Highrise

re: #420 EtNorskTroll

Boy I know what you mean about engineering degree.

I would stay in lab up till like 9pm at night...and come out and college guys would be playing hacky sack under the lights. I'd shake my head and just wonder...who has that time? I'd have college students hand me flyers to go do things, I looked at them blankly...what is your major I'd say?

LOL.

I was so booked out by the time they got done with me..5 yrs plus summers of college. Do you know it took me years to pick up another book to read for enjoyment again? YEARS!

Yep. I know that feeling WAY, WAY too well, highrise.

My last 6 months was a literal blur: 3 labs and no GE classes--all of them engineering courses. I was taking 17 units my last semester because they were going to cut my funding off.

Fun, fun days my last semester...NOT!

~Norsk

429 Highrise  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 12:51:55pm

re: #428 EtNorskTroll

AND I worked 3 jobs to boot! Weekend (pharmacy tech), after school engineering job, and tutoring.

Am I sounding like our parents? Walking home in the 6 feet snow, up hill, no shoes on?

/snickers

430 ColoradoJim  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:00:17pm

re: #429 Highrise

Am I sounding like our parents? Walking home in the 6 feet snow, up hill, no shoes on?

I think it was uphill in the snow to AND from school for them. :)

431 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:01:05pm

re: #429 Highrise

re: #428 EtNorskTroll

AND I worked 3 jobs to boot! Weekend (pharmacy tech), after school engineering job, and tutoring.

Am I sounding like our parents? Walking home in the 6 feet snow, up hill, no shoes on?

/snickers

Pharmacy tech? Yuk. I'm doing it now and it sucks!

432 EtNorskTroll  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:10:30pm

re: #429 Highrise

re: #428 EtNorskTroll

AND I worked 3 jobs to boot! Weekend (pharmacy tech), after school engineering job, and tutoring.

Am I sounding like our parents? Walking home in the 6 feet snow, up hill, BOTH WAYS, no shoes on?

/snickers

I had a job, too: worked at the Physics department when my hours fit. Gives me the willies just thinking about it all again.

Barf.

~ENT

433 RobCon  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:12:54pm

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Very funny video. It brightened my day.
Who is the lucky girl that has that loser for a boyfriend?

434 Carol Herman  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:17:07pm

This was so delicious. I never thought I'd say this; but John Cary should give more of these events. He wasn't even in hostile territory.

Drudge has up this video, as well. So it's getting seen around the Internet. The arrested kid looks like such a doofus. He didn't want to get Tasered. He got tasered.

And, he's off to jail.

Hope he shows up, again, when Hillary campaigns.

435 Hawk59  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:31:22pm

re: #403 jamgarr

re: #375 Hawk59

I'm surprised no one has asked you this yet - when you honor your moral obligation to resist what you have determined to be an unwarranted arrest are the arresting officers allowed to apply the restraint needed to complete the arrest they deem appropriate?

Of course they are allowed to, if they reasonably believe that what they are doing is within the constraints of the law. My point is not that by resisting (in a non physically offensive way) one is going to somehow magically not be arrested. It will all be ajudicated later. But the point is that you have stated your rights and were willing to defend them to some point. If you, as I have said before, KNEW beyond any reasonable doubt that you were in fact not legally arrestable, (and you were right) your case will be dismissed. I am generally aware if and when, and to what extent I cross the line, if I do. So should everyone.

Or maybe, just maybe, in some fantasy world, there will be a Police Officer out there who will take pause, and before actually subjecting himself and myself to all of the paperwork and indignity of following through with a questionable arrest, realize that maybe the public is better served by "moving along" and letting it go. Ego doesnt generally allow this of course, but there are some out there who can rise above it. Who knows, maybe you will be fortunate. Maybe you wont.

However, to roll over and allow it, because in this case, the victim is some crazy assed white boy, insures that someday, perhaps not soon, you will get yours as well. After all, you all seem (as I do) to be fairly outspoken folks. Rember, the law is there for all of us (and yes, I do mean us).

436 j-damn  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:33:45pm
Student body is now demanding removal of tasers from campus

Typical.

When some freak shoots up a campus it's "Oh, why didn't the cops dooo something?"

When the cops stop some freak from "doing something" it's "Oh, why did the cops dooo something?"

437 Maximu§  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 1:43:43pm

re: #426 Hard Right

Chris Rock has a primer for all of you who thing it was unecessary.

Chris Rock

LOL, I got plenty of laughs on that video.

Maximu§
3/11 ACR

438 yochanan  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:01:28pm

saw the vedio he clearly resisted arrest.

i got arrested once at a rally against some nazi scum who wanted to march in skokie, il. When the cop said your under arrest i comely said 'i will do what ever you tell me to do' and went to the paddy wagon as i was directed. At the trial it was thrown out.

439 yochanan  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:08:05pm

re: #437 Maximu§


that is so true

wear a i support the NYPD T-SHIRT good call
wear a fuck the police bad call

440 charles_martel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:15:45pm

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

I do agree with you. The fool deserved to be dragged away and arrested, but the cops did overreact. They had five or six cops on top of him when they tased him. They had the situation under control, and did not need to tase him. If they can do that to moonbats, they can do it to us as well.

441 dahozho  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:16:52pm

People are finished, potatoes are done. This guy was done, and was told by an officer that his time at the mic was up. He kept talking and didn't siddown.

Why did he think the rules didn't apply to him? Ok, maybe the tazer was a bit much, but this guy *wasn't* cooperating and was NOT going to play by the rules everyone else was following. Maybe those officers know this guy from other situations, and have really had it.

The brain activity he showed, I'm not suprised he was trying to argue and resist armed law enforcement. Sheesh.

And "doesn't have his wallet." Phhhft. He knew his plan would get him into trouble.

442 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:20:28pm

re: #437 Maximu§

re: #426 Hard Right


Chris Rock has a primer for all of you who thing it was unecessary.

Chris Rock


LOL, I got plenty of laughs on that video.

Maximu§
3/11 ACR

I laughed my butt off when I first saw it. A lot of truth in that.

Hawk, I've seen a few resisting arrest charges upheld when the person was arrested for unfeasable reasons. Doesn't matter if you're right. You obey the police and sort it out later.

443 charles_martel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:24:36pm

The fool was hardcore moonbat. When they led him away, he said he was afraid that they were going to kill him! He probably is a Troofer, believes in chemtrails, and all that...stupid child.

444 cwm3  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:30:47pm

I've watched a few of the videos of this incident. Did anyone else hear John Kerry making a joke, at the student's expense, as the student was being tasered and cuffed?

Listen to his remarks, as the student is on the floor, underneath about four officers. "I'll answer his question. And, um, yep... Unfortunately, he's not available to come up here and swear me in as President."

You can find this witticism about 1:40 into this video on YouTube:

What's the first rule of comedy again?

445 Carolyn  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:37:01pm
GAINESVILLE, Fla. - A University of Florida student was Tasered and arrested after trying angrily and repeatedly to ask U.S. Senator John Kerry about the 2004 election and other subjects during a campus forum. Tuesday morning, a judge ordered the student released from jail on his own recognizance.
Videos of Monday’s incident posted on several Web sites show officers pulling Andrew Meyer, 21, away from the microphone after he asks Kerry about impeaching President Bush and whether he and Bush were both members of the secret society Skull and Bones at Yale University.


The question was what started the whole thing as far as I could tell from earlier video

446 code red 21  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:38:34pm

I'm not surprised by the moonbat showing up at the speech, Gainesville is full of them, but I am surprised by the small turnout. The University auditorium isn't that large a venue. Usually when they have political speakers come to town they have it at the O dome which is where the basketball team plays and concerts are held. Kerry might be glad the spotlight is on the fool and not the small turnout to hear his speech.

447 Eagle  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:43:45pm

420 EtNorskTroll

I've been nailed by some pretty high voltage in my lifetime.

Each and every time that I did, I didn't howl. I cleared my throat (think stifled yell).

I've been wondering about that. His 'screams' sounded a bit ...

... whats the PC word for "screamed like a little sissy girl"?

I've never been zapped meself, so I didnt want to bring it up.

448 Dustyvet  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 2:50:54pm

Kerry denounces the tasing of the moonbat; Update: Two officers placed on leave; Update: Moonbat is ... a journalism major

[Link: hotair.com...]

449 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 3:01:31pm

re: #448 Dustyvet

Kerry denounces the tasing of the moonbat; Update: Two officers placed on leave; Update: Moonbat is ... a journalism major

[Link: hotair.com...]

I wouldn't be surprised if the leave is standard practice while they investigate "the incident".

450 matt009  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 3:33:00pm

Maybe the cops didn't need to tase him.

But it sure is satisfying to watch.

451 MeanMrMustard  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 3:40:15pm

re: #450 matt009

Yep, don't think I've seen a punk that needed tased more.

452 Nadnerb  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 3:41:34pm

They shouldn't have done that. Yeah, he's a moonbat, but this was completely unnecessary.

453 Jheka  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 3:55:38pm

Did someone say taser (damned funny video)?

454 gtiness  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 4:01:20pm

I'm late I know..but that kid deserved every volt.

455 NomadOfNorad  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 4:06:19pm

The kid that got tazered is on G4TV's "Attack of the Show" right now. I think they're also going to be talking about it all on The Loop, towards the end of the show.

456 alexa kim  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 4:07:13pm

After watching other videos of him right after the arrest (asking people to follow him because he's afraid the police are going to kill him) and just learning that he has a website showing other clips of him provoking people in other situations, it explained why he was released so suddenly. And the way he hugged his dad when he went to pick him up. He's mentally ill. Maybe not a lot, but some.

Or he is, in fact, the real "pig" - as in capitalist pig. He pulls these stunts all the time, apparently, and perhaps in this case, he needs money, along with web traffic. So, he'll file a nuisance lawsuit and maybe actually win because those emotional kids over in those universities are still being jerked around by his melodramatic performance. Whew. I was getting tired of explaining the obvious over there.

But power to people! We're being jack-booted out of our rights! Nelson Mandela! Free... somebody! Who stole my oreos?! Mom liked you best!

Now I'm going back to reading about how we killed another Taliban kidnapper. Now that makes me happy.

457 NomadOfNorad  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 4:07:15pm

Dang, his "interview" is over already.

458 NomadOfNorad  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 4:23:35pm

Well, I'm not really sure if that was really him on AotS, doing a self-parody, or if that was someone else pretending to be him, doing an acid parody... It just went by too quick. :-|

Probably someone pretending to be him, but you never know... :-D

459 RepJ  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 5:07:59pm

I'm surprised this made it to the frontpage of AOL's services. Of course, they've spun it in such a way that Kerry comes out smelling like a rose...

460 Florida Lady  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 5:10:34pm

I don't post much - not much time to, really! - mostly a lurker, but wanted to pass this on. My son goes to UF, and here's his response to my email this morning:

"The kid was given a certain amount of time to ask Kerry a question. He never really asked his question and ran over his time limit, but then they gave him some added time. He still wasn't finished after that, and he used some profanity, so he was told to stop. He didn't so they shut off his mic and pulled him away. He resisted, and they tasered him. There are like 50 people outside the police station right now (my son lives right next to the station) protesting against police brutality, but the general sentiment around here is that the kid was just looking for attention and had it coming.

It's really not as big a deal as it seems. It's only making headlines because Kerry was involved."

My son is NOT a Kerry fan at all - committed Republican - but he is always truthful and fair, so I take what he says at face value.

461 ointmentfly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 5:51:34pm

The word of the day is "manhandled", which is what should have happened to this jackass. I have a problem with little women being thrust into this situation as police officers. Their should have been a couple of 250 lb cops who could have balled this idiot up and walked him outside. At that point, he should have been told to leave and when he didn't the cops should have repackaged him into the police cruiser and sent him on his merry way to jail. I think this guy deserved what he got, but had the right people been in the right places, it didn't have to be this way.

462 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:09:33pm

I am against the police 100%, they should never have Tased him.

463 Thin blue line  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:10:13pm

Where was the popcorn when it was needed most. I hear those tasers put out enough volts to pop a few bags.

"Islam is not a race"

464 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:15:34pm

re: #15 EtNorskTroll

I don't agree with what this guy did (disrupting a meeting), but I don't approve of the way that the cops handled it.

Tasering should only be used when there is a threat to an employee of the security detail...not when they want someone to do what they want done.

I'm telling you, Lizards: think this one through.

First they tasered moonbats and I said nothing...

Think it through.

~Norsk Troll

/the cops should be charged with assault.

*pulls the pin and throws it in*

Responses?

Exactly

465 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:36:33pm
466 insomni  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:38:53pm

I love it that he screamed and cried like a child when tazered, especially when I've seen women being tazered that react much more calmly. It got the desired effect, though, setting the moonbat girls screaming. Have the people screaming in his defense never heard of a tazer and how it works, inflicting very little pain but merely immobilizing? Did they think the police were strapping electrodes to his genitals or something? And the cries of "police brutality!" This is so entertaining, I might just make some popcorn and watch it a few more times.

467 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:40:56pm

re: #421 buzzsawmonkey
re: #420 EtNorskTroll
You'll like this I'm sure ...
Popular Mechanics Editor Eric Sofge volunteers to be tasered for "science."
[Link: www.popularmechanics.com...]

He ain't happy, but he talks through it in a more manly manner than that screechy wussy twice his size did. Noticed too that when the current is ON, one can't do much, but when it's turned off, the police still have a functioning belligerant on their hands. Bet the bigger the person, the more muted the effects.
I thought the dead give away was the yelling, which reeked of an announcement FOR the AUDIENCE: "Don't taser ME!" Quite the presence of mind to set it up like that. Lurid scene-chewing drama designed to make himself a celebrity. Wouldn't be the least bit surprised if more than half the put-upon audience in attendance, crwoded and shoved out of their chairs, completely interrupted by this scene hog, was muttering, "zap him again, dammit."

468 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:41:24pm

re: #338 BODYGUARDEAGLE


Taser? NOT a WEAPON...IT IS a piece of NON-LETHAL equipment to be used primarily to subdue unruly or combative persons...same as handcuffs used to stabilize or control an out of control situation or person.

Fact: A taser is a non-leathal weapon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser

469 insomni  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:41:32pm

This joker was bucking around, trying to get away from the police, not to mention screaming like a spoiled brat whose parents would sue the school if he were sent to detention. Give me a break, the police had every right to taze/tase him.

470 Blackacre  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:42:46pm

A gaggle of officers had this moonbat surrounded and down. The use of the taser is arguably excessive force under the circumstances.

Nonetheless, Don't tase me, bro' -- well, that's just classic.

471 Captain Dubious  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:44:47pm

In one fell swoop this moron has become the Bart Sibrel of his generation.

And Kerry missed his opportunity, nay - his obligation to clock this assclown. Why? Was he waiting for the results of the

global test

?

472 insomni  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:45:55pm

re: #461 ointmentfly

Their should have been a couple of 250 lb cops who could have balled this idiot up and walked him outside.

There were some big cops there, but he wasn't exactly cooperating. Even a 250 lb cop can't just "walk someone outside" if they're acting like a pogo-stick.

473 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:46:58pm

re: #468 nev.

re: #338 BODYGUARDEAGLE

Taser? NOT a WEAPON...IT IS a piece of NON-LETHAL equipment to be used primarily to subdue unruly or combative persons...same as handcuffs used to stabilize or control an out of control situation or person.

Fact: A taser is a non-leathal weapon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser

They're selling them weapons in pink, baby blue and brushed silver.

474 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:52:19pm

re: #473 wanumba

re: #468 nev.

Fact: A taser is a non-leathal weapon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser

They're selling them weapons in pink, baby blue and brushed silver.

The colour of a Taser does not change the fact that it is a non-lethal weapon.

475 insomni  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:54:02pm

re: #440 charles_martel

And so what? If I'm behaving like that in public, resisting arrest, I deserve to be tasered! I'm really not worried about obnoxious louts getting a little zap to calm them down.

476 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:55:26pm

re: #474 nev.

re: #473 wanumba

re: #468 nev.

Fact: A taser is a non-leathal weapon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser

They're selling them weapons in pink, baby blue and brushed silver.

The colour of a Taser does not change the fact that it is a non-lethal weapon.

At http://www.taser.org/, they have a picture of a purple Taser on their front page.

Notice the title of that page:
"Taser Weapon Nonleathal Weapons of the Future"

I'm just calling it what it is - a weapon.

477 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:59:11pm

Anyone comment on the fact that John F. Kerry was at one point eligible for Secret Service protection as a U.S. presidential candidate, protection mostly against the nutcases? Somewhere up there in the thread?
Irate microphone hog actually works his way closer to the podium and therefore the speaker himself, after asking obnoxious and plainly aggressive questions which give the listeners the idea that the questioner is mad at Kerry.
2/3 of the student body growls, "zap him again" but the official news is out, with a modified version: students want to "ban tasers." booo hoo. Ban self-centered spoiled blow hards, while they're at it.

478 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 6:59:39pm

re: #474 nev.
Pink.

479 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:00:47pm

purple's cool, too.

480 nev.  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:10:01pm

re: #479 wanumba

purple's cool, too.

:-)

re: #477 wanumba

Anyone comment on the fact that John F. Kerry was at one point eligible for Secret Service protection as a U.S. presidential candidate, protection mostly against the nutcases? Somewhere up there in the thread?
Irate microphone hog actually works his way closer to the podium and therefore the speaker himself, after asking obnoxious and plainly aggressive questions which give the listeners the idea that the questioner is mad at Kerry. [...]

That's true, but there were 6 armed police officers around him.

481 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:12:21pm

re: #476 nev.
No offense, just wikipedia is such a pill of a site.
But just as you have asserted, the ol' dictionary would define a taser as a weapon. A weapon being anything that can be used offensively and/or defensively. At the levels of power with this generation of tasers, it is more a defensive subduing thing. One lives to tell the tale.

482 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:13:39pm

re: #480 nev.

483 jayzee  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:14:56pm

If anyone is interested in my opinion- the newer video, IMHO, shows that this guy earned his tasering. He was warned that he would be tased, then flipped himself over and attempted to fight with the officers again.

That being said, I sincerely believe that someone needs to give this kid meds. He is dillusional, not because of his question but his statements show a total break with reality ("They are giving me to the government").

484 wanumba  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:22:17pm

huh.
musta tasered out my comment.
ANywayre: #480 nev.

That's true, but there were 6 armed police officers around him.


So, by tasering the guy, a potentially more dangerous confrontation with armed officers who were close to Kerry was avoided.

485 Gadfly  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:31:16pm

This is what happens when you act like an uncivil dumbass.

486 silversmith  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:34:33pm

I did some protesting in the 60s and 70s and always did exactly anything a cop asked of me. Always on my good behavior in public. It just makes sense.

487 get2djnow  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 7:55:19pm

I wanted to taser that moron myself, just for being an obnoxious, overbearing idiot who would not a) ask a question, b) let the other moron respond, or c) allow the police to do their job in clearing him from the room.

Warning, even the most retarded police officer has the right to put handcuffs on you. You don't have the right to walk away. It stinks, but that's the way it is and if you believe that cops have at least the right to protect themselves from possible criminals, you don't want the status quo to change.

488 bkgodfrey  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 8:03:18pm

ha ha, I'll bet the Bush administration ordered this hit. By the way, Clinton was not impeached for receiving oral sex, bro. moonbattery at its best and this clip has made my week.

489 bkgodfrey  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 8:05:52pm

ha ha, i just finished watching the end of the clip. I like how the kid thinks he is actually important enough to kill. typical stupid elitist college kid (and i say that as a student in my young 20's)

490 mlureau@verizon.net  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 8:13:02pm

OK i have been there...and i admit that it is hard not to act like a crazy a-hole when your being man-handled by the police...but i can honestly say that they were trying to just remove him from the event before he started flailing his arms around (threateningly) and acting like a belligerent A-hole...like i said...he thought he wasn't doing any harm but running a muck, flailing your arms around... and getting loud with the police NEVER results in a good situation for anyone...people might say this was a bit extreme on the laws behalf...but it started out as " OK guy enough lets go" to frantic resisting of the police...and again...that always ends badly (I'm no crook but i know from experience)

491 William  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 8:15:05pm

Current poll on CNN.com main page:

Do you think the officers who Tasered a student at a Sen. John Kerry event acted correctly?

Yes: 31% (3,697 votes)
No: 69% (8,131 votes)

Total Votes: 11,828

[Link: www.cnn.com...]

492 Twombley2  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 8:57:12pm

Isn't it interesting that at a Republican or Conservative speech or rally, the protestors are allowed to do ANYTHING THEY WANT in an effort to break it up, but at a Democratic Rally free speech is suppressed with an Iron Boot and an Iron Fist?

Isnt it interesting that at Democrat rallies and speeches, NO TOLERANCE of ANY DISSENT WHATSOEVER is the ORDER of the day? we saw that demonstrated here live and in living color. They will use any force necessary to put down ANY form of difference of opinion or dissent, and no matter what they have to do, their message will not get interrupted. Welcome to Facism, Socialism and Tyranny.

Anyone notice that Shrillary hired Sandy 'i steal classified documents to hide our screw up' Berger as her Nat'l Security Advisor to her campaign, just like Kerry did? am i the only one who thinks that guy should be rotting in prison for treason and espionage?

twombley

493 Summer  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:35:09pm

I know this is like totally cruel, but I really enjoyed that. =)

I know he really shouldn't have been tasered. I mean he was obviously a leftist wimp with no balls at all. He's just a stupid idiot, especially the whole thing about them taking him away to kill him. That made me totally laugh so hard. But the tasering was kinda out of line. I mean, ya, they had the right to do it but...was a lil excessive I think.

Still, i really enjoyed that. =)

And did anyone notice what a wimp the guy was? I mean not only his "get off me!" squeals and stuff, but even his screams! =) "Ow...ow...ow..." Was that like a low powered taser or something? Or did that guy really have no cojones?

I dunno, sounds like he didn't and all.

But I really, REALLY, enjoyed that =) hehe

I know. I'm cruel.

494 Dynamite  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:41:32pm

re: #13 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

re: #1 TeamDub

Get all the facts first.

He deserved it.

It's called the 1st Amendment. His Rights were totally violated.

495 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 9:47:01pm
496 snowtravel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:48:55pm

re: #495 buzzsawmonkey

Yeah, good point. 'Cause obviously those were private cops zapping Mr. Meyer with private-issue tasers at the privately-funded University of Florida.

No sir, no state action there.

497 pestolover  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:49:17pm

From Barfly:
Faye Dunaway: "I hate cops. I HATE cops. Don't you just hate cops?"
Mickey Rourke: "No...but somehow I feel better when they're not around."

Two cops should have asked this guy to stop talking NOW and sit down or leave OR be arrested. That never happened. What happened is that two cops laid hands on the guy from behind and started walking away with him BEFORE they explained a thing to him, AND before giving him a clear directive of what they required from him. This is why he kept saying as he was being taken down, "What did I do? What did I do?" This is typical knucklehead cop behavior. Cops should not arrogate to themselves right to lay hands on a citizen without first telling him how to avoid it. This guy was neither threat nor a persistent nuisance. He was rude if he took the Mic out of turn. The cops had been right to ask him to desist and return to order. If anyone laid hands on me when I was merely speaking my mind, I too would have resisted. This is unbearable. I'm find it disturbing that so many people are unable to see how the cops could have dealt with this situation better than they did. The guy is a moonbat. So what! That in no way justifies what these meathooked, numb skulled, regulation-book-reading, make-more-work cops did to this confused conspiracy theorist. I'm with Mickey Rourke.

498 GreenSoccer  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 10:54:15pm

I'm really torn 50/50 on this. I am one person and I am a hung jury.

499 snowtravel  Tue, Sep 18, 2007 11:03:10pm

re: #497 pestolover

Well said.

500 Lizard by the Bay  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 12:00:25am

Is it wrong to find considerable guilty pleasure in watching this video?

501 nev.  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 3:25:43am

re: #481 wanumba

re: #476 nev.
No offense, just wikipedia is such a pill of a site.
But just as you have asserted, the ol' dictionary would define a taser as a weapon. A weapon being anything that can be used offensively and/or defensively. At the levels of power with this generation of tasers, it is more a defensive subduing thing. One lives to tell the tale.

No offence, I totally agree - but it served its purpose.

502 nev.  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 3:28:01am

re: #484 wanumba

huh.
musta tasered out my comment.
ANywayre: #480 nev.

That's true, but there were 6 armed police officers around him.


So, by tasering the guy, a potentially more dangerous confrontation with armed officers who were close to Kerry was avoided.

In my opinion the Tasering was not necessary.

503 Roger  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 4:31:31am

re: #502 nev.

I'm glad you don't set policy.

Say your grappling with the jerk and his crazy buddy pulls your gun from your holster; shoots you in the back or shoots Kerry? Then starts shooting you?

Wouldn't you go down thinking I should have tased the jerk while fingering my holster?

504 RobCon  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 5:06:53am

I think the taser is the closest thing we have to a gay bomb considering the effect it has on loud mouth, tough guys.

505 nev.  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 5:30:53am

re: #503 Roger

re: #502 nev.

I'm glad you don't set policy.

Say your grappling with the jerk and his crazy buddy pulls your gun from your holster; shoots you in the back or shoots Kerry? Then starts shooting you?

Wouldn't you go down thinking I should have tased the jerk while fingering my holster?

Since there were 6 officers around him they could immediately react and Tase him the moment he went for a holster. But that's all hypothetical anyway, it was never going to happen.

Read this comment:
re: #497 pestolover

From Barfly:
[...]
Two cops should have asked this guy to stop talking NOW and sit down or leave OR be arrested. That never happened. What happened is that two cops laid hands on the guy from behind and started walking away with him BEFORE they explained a thing to him, AND before giving him a clear directive of what they required from him. This is why he kept saying as he was being taken down, "What did I do? What did I do?" This is typical knucklehead cop behavior. Cops should not arrogate to themselves right to lay hands on a citizen without first telling him how to avoid it. This guy was neither threat nor a persistent nuisance. He was rude if he took the Mic out of turn. The cops had been right to ask him to desist and return to order. If anyone laid hands on me when I was merely speaking my mind, I too would have resisted. This is unbearable. I'm find it disturbing that so many people are unable to see how the cops could have dealt with this situation better than they did. The guy is a moonbat. So what! That in no way justifies what these meathooked, numb skulled, regulation-book-reading, make-more-work cops did to this confused conspiracy theorist. I'm with Mickey Rourke. [Emphasis added.]

506 BeerForMyHorses  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 5:57:34am

College police stand by and do nothing while violent moonbats storm the stage and attack Ann Coulter, David Horowitz and other conservatives with pies. But let one lone moonbat ask one inconvenient question too many of John Kerry and they immediately respond with fascist force. Lizards should not celebrate this.

507 Kobyashi Maru  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 7:44:30am

It WAS 'State Action"__ police state action; those were Gainesville City cops. He is a moron, but those posters who say "he got what he deserved" are morons.

A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged; a liberal is a conservative who gets falsely arrested. Count me as liberal here.

This guy posed no danger, he was in the hold of about 5 donut eaters when they tased him. This is where communism and fascism meet; where nobody can get out of line.

This site stands for freedom; they tase people and much worse in Saudi, and Egypt and Russia and China and Cuba &tc., &tc. for much less. We do not tase US citizens even those with whom we disagree, or even hate just because they make a ruckus. He rushed nobody. This was out of control police.

I hope he sues the hell out of the GPD and wins.

508 Greensoccer  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 7:52:16am

re: #496 snowtravel

Did you see where the ACLU is arguing that the foot tapping and hand gestures under the stall by the senator were constitutionally protected free speech?

There's a good article entitled "Tasered Student has History of Practical Jokes" and how he changed completely the moment the cameras were not on him. as a journalism student he could have designed the whole thing.

509 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 9:30:49am
510 wanumba  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 10:00:21am

What goes around comes around. Liberal Left pressure on police and fire departments to lower physical standards to allow more women and smaller men to join means more smaller, less strong people are sent out to deal with large, aggressive people. There was a study some years ago that found that women were more likely to pull a gun than their male police counterparts. Shouldn't be a surprise. Colt makes men AND women equal.
The Taser provides the smaller person that tactical upgrade necessary to confront a larger, stronger and aggressive person without resorting to guns.
Look at the comparative sizes of the cops and the uncooperative subject. Since he refused to maintain common social agreed upon norms in the Q&A period and the common social decorum expected of the hundreds of people there, a decorum that is a necessity to allow such events to be held , there was no way the cops there were going to get him out of that place without some sort of tactical assistance - in this case, the taser.
The guy yelled "NO TASER!" So, he saw it being threatened before it was used. Did he stop and freeze? And make meek and oops? Nope. He got worse. He was zapped, thanks to the fruit of Liberal Left policies. Fitting, actually.

511 BODYGUARDEAGLE  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 10:08:17am

re: #468 nev.

re: #338 BODYGUARDEAGLE


Taser? NOT a WEAPON...IT IS a piece of NON-LETHAL equipment to be used primarily to subdue unruly or combative persons...same as handcuffs used to stabilize or control an out of control situation or person.

Fact: A taser is a non-leathal weapon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser

***
***
NEV.
I think if you will check some where besides 'wiki', such as the manuals which Police get when issued a Taser, IT IS referred to as a piece of non-lethal 'equipment', instead of weapon. Usually, It seems any uninformed source such as the reference you made from 'wiki' would have only their own agenda based definitions to print. Look up 'Weapon' by itself.

512 wanumba  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 11:13:37am

To paraphrase a pirate female:
If he'd fought like a man, he'd not be squealing like a pig.
AVAST!
ARRG!

513 Greensoccer  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 11:29:34am

Michael Savage was against the police as hurting political speech.

Prager was for the police as he believes in giving the benefit of the doubt to the police and considers that the boy was a narcissist who doesn't understand that there is a difference between a senator who is invited to speak and the boy and his inflated self esteem that he has a right to make a speech and hog the microphone. Either this was the first time someone had set boundaries for him or he was playing the situation.

514 Greensoccer  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 12:00:25pm

I should add that Prager kept saying he was agnostic on the act of tasering. He said he didn't have enough info. A policeman said you taser someone to subdue them long enough to get the handcuffs on. The pain lasts as long as the burst of energy.

515 Twombley2  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 12:09:14pm

ok, a taser is meant to be a non-lethal weapon. the problem with that is, if the guy is prone to epilepsy or heart disease, a taser turns into a VERY lethal weapon. especially if a suspect is already in cuffs, and on the deck. totally and completely un necessary.

twombley

516 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 2:04:02pm
517 Twombley2  Wed, Sep 19, 2007 7:34:20pm

re: #516 buzzsawmonkey

Ok, my bad. i had info that the guy was cuffed and subdued. if someone is down and taken care of theres no need for that. but if this guy wasnt and he was dumb enough to keep fighting, then i guess he got what he deserved. i wont shed any tears for a moron who keeps on resisting and gets that treatment.

Still, i stand by my ORIGINAL post, in that ive NEVER seen a dissenter at a REPUBLICAN convention smacked down like that. NEVER. ive seen a lot of republican/ conservative speakers assaulted. the dems dont hesitate to crush dissension in the ranks do they? i guess free speech is only allowed if it benefits the liberal agenda, eh?

twombley.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Chimps, then bats.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

Bad facts make bad laws -- Said during the PMRC hearings.