The NYT is also where the USSR got most of its intel. Thanks, Gray Red Lady.

(The word Gray was supposed to be struck out. Oops.)

Just when you think the NY Times can't sick any lower...

Gotta give props to the NYT for consistency.

Anything that can help destroy this country is fit to print.

Amazing, considering that the Sulzburgers, Rosenthals and Krugman, etc., will be the first to feel the sword when we get Islammed.

Unless they convert, of course. Which they probably would.

Which side is the Times on? We all know the answer to that.....and they just showed us another glaring example.......

They can always sink lower. Their printing presses haven't fallen through the floor into the sewer yet. (On can be forgiven for thinking that they have, given the stench that arises from their paper.)

Freedom of the press is a wonderful thing. But, ya know could just , you know stop abetting the enemy?

This is sad. I really wanted to see this story in the MSM *AFTER* this [unprintable sorry little sponge] was indicted.

NYT isn't even pretending to be part of the Western tradition anymore-- which includes loyalty to country.

Here's a link to the jihadi's temporary site I found on Jihad Watch.

Clash of Civilizations

You might want to send a note to support@worldpress.com and tell them what you think about them hosting jihadi sites.

You had me at "NYT Blows..."

re: #10 coquimbojoe

You had me at "NYT Blows..."

Only on odd-numbered days. On even-numbered days, they suck.

And the stock value of the NYT continues to leak away.

...drip, ...drip, ...drip

Did the NYT building have green lights on it the other day? Just wonderin'...

NYT Blows

Nothing more need be said.

:::: busily dumping my shares of the NYT ::::

Oh who is kidding who.... I sold that pig years ago.

Mr. Khan, who was born in Saudi Arabia and grew up in Queens

Born in Saudi Arabia, but raised in USA and is now a citizen - only by default as his parents are the impetus for this incidental citizenship.

Citizenship of Applicant's Children. If a parent who is applying for naturalization expects to be naturalized before any of his or her children reaches age 18, it is likely that such children who are living in the United States will automatically become citizens.

Perhaps this 21-year-old so called "American" named Samir Khan is unaware that his parents took the oath of allegiance to the United States of America in order to become naturalized citizens.
This Oath of Citizenship was taken as a solemn statement that they called upon God to witness, that they each absolutely gave up, of their own individual free will, their citizenship to any other country as well as allegiance to any foreign ruler whose subject they had been.
They promised on their honor that they would support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic - which includes their own son. They took that oath of their own free will, supposedly keeping back nothing in their mind.
If they took this Oath with the intention to deceive, they are traitors to this country as well.
Samir's blatant anti-American, pro-jihad activity should garner a knock on the door by authorities questioning his status as a citizen in good standing. Citizenship files need to be revisited and an investigation of fitness for citizenship reexamined.
Further, his citizenship, along with that of every member of that household - each and every one considered enablers, should be up for review, immediately.
There are certain criteria which eliminate citizenship potential . . .

Communist Party and Similar Membership. A person cannot become a citizen who, at any time during a period of ten years just before filing a petition for naturalization in court, has been a member of or connected with the Communist Party, or a similar party within or outside the United States; or a member of or connected with any other party or organization that is against all organized government or for world communism, dictatorship in the United States, overthrowing the United States Government by force, injuring or killing officers of the United States, or sabotage.

LINK
******

While there is nothing to suggest that Mr. Khan is operating in concert with militant leaders, or breaking any laws. . .

The NYT's piece was prepared by MICHAEL MOSS and SOUAD MEKHENNET. Is this reporter on some mind altering pharmaceutical creating the sound of an old 45rpm playing too long, simmering directly under the hot sun? It's obviously not an issue of the video quality as Samir's voice would speed up to sound like "Alvin, Simon or Theodore of the Chipmunks" if audio was adjusted to balance Samir's voice with that voice of this reporter. Whatever the Rx concoction this reporter is on, it's apparent side-effects go well beyond voice alteration.
And the

A Freeper added the comment below.

The terrorist site is called [Link: inshallahshaheed.muslimpad.com...]
IP address: 70.84.110.84

Internet Service Provider:

OrgName: ThePlanet.com Internet Services, Inc.

OrgID: TPCM

Address: 1333 North Stemmons Freeway

Address: Suite 110

City: Dallas S

tateProv: TX

PostalCode: 75207

Country: US

You would think that as they watch their paper shrink to the size of a daily, the advertising revenue to disappear, their stock price to sink to junk bond levels and their readership to desert them en masse, that they powers that be at the New York Slimes would finally, finally get a clue that we really would, left to the druthers of the American people, lock them all away for TREASON.

Freedom of the press does NOT mean "freedom to commit treason."

My previous comment was cut off . . .

And the NYT continues to plummet - no surprise there.

What, the NYT outed Installshield as an AQ minion?

re: #11 JamesTKirk

re: #10 coquimbojoe

You had me at "NYT Blows..."

Only on odd-numbered days. On even-numbered days, they suck.

Can't they do both?

While the Times has been on the ropes for a while (that article about how it had a Vietcong Colonel on staff during Vietnam was classic), it hit the skids for me back in the early days of the Iraq war when it ran a lengthy article about an Iraqi translator assisting the Americans - right down to the guy's full name, village, street address, and family information. It was basically begging someone to behead the poor guy. At the time I couldn't tell if they were simply failing to censor themselves out of naivete, or actively selling out people as part of a political agenda. Well, question answered.

re: #18 galloping granny

It seems that a great many people have forgotten that with rights come responsibilities. A free society does not work unless we exercise our rights without common sense, common courtesy, and common decency.

Is it really news anymore that what they do that submarines the U.S.? I would think we'd just start reporting the times when they actually take the U.S.'s side, as few and far between those instances really are.

Oh Boy...
Do newspapers think about the implications of printing sensitive stuff like this?
Do they ever check with the authorities to see if they are already under investigation? Assuming the Authorities would tell them.
Would they do anything to get a story?

This is depressing. I do hope the NYT is not the best on offer. I dread to think.

PS. Altho he was born in Saudi it's not really a typical Saudi name, and Khan is very very common as a surname in Pakistan. Possible his parents were working there when he was born?
Don't you just love these gung-ho jihadists who live in America and enjoy all the good things, like freedom, you have to offer and then go and (delete) all over you?
They love the likes of OBL and AQ, but if you put them in one of their training camps and they saw what they loved up close, personal and in their faces it would probably frighten them to death. It's easy being an Internet Jihadist, especially if you're tucked up nice and cosy and safe in your bedroom in your parents' house. Pathetic, but potentially very dangerous.

"Mr Zarqawi" will always be known as "The Zarkman" to me. The infamy of his deeds has been appropriately dealt with by the noted blogger and hot rod scholar, Iowahawk.

OT

The Dallas Morning News has an article today about the brave group that protested Muslim Day at Six Flags in Arlington, TX yesterday. DMN, of course, villifies the protesters.

([Link: www.dallasnews.com...]

Also notice that throughout the article they refer to the dead Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as “Mr. Zarqawi.”

They also refer to Osama as "Mr. bin Laden." ... *sigh* It's moments like these when I wonder if I really do want to be a journalist...

re: #28 domer113

Also notice that throughout the article they refer to the dead Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as “Mr. Zarqawi.”

They also refer to Osama as "Mr. bin Laden." ... *sigh* It's moments like these when I wonder if I really do want to be a journalist...

It's times like these that I wish they were real journalists.

re: #25 Is it me?

This is depressing. I do hope the NYT is not the best on offer.

Don't worry, my old high school's newspaper is giving the NYT a run for its money. It even has plagarized articles about global warming in the editorial section.

re: #18 galloping granny

...

Freedom of the press does NOT mean "freedom to commit treason."

Or freedom to facilitate group SUICIDE!

I'm just not up for that, Granny!

re: #27 djs713

Right because those who protested are just racist, xenophobic, yokels who should be innoculated against diseases like the rest of NASCAR Nation...

/sarc

#16 justamomof4

As a Brit I found your post very interesting. It has some telling points and it would appear that he has violated some of them. But did he know?
As for the rest, depending upon the content of the blog, surely he must be breaking some of your laws? Incitement, aiding and abetting the enemy, sedition, right the way up to treason?
Depending on how bad it is, surely a review of his citizenship would be in order? At least as a warning to others. How many others are there and do the Authorities know about them?
Too many questions and not enough answers - I do not feel qualified to comment upon any of them and will rely on the Great Lizard Army to comment.
Regards

Would it be appropriate to refer to the NYT as Nuanced Yathrib Treachery?

Also notice that throughout the article they refer to the dead Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as “Mr. Zarqawi.”

For the NYTimes, that's nothing new. Years ago, I remember reading a review of a Meatloaf concert. The first reference in the review was to Meatloaf. Thereafter, the Times reviewer referred to him as "Mr. Loaf."

Our country will defeat our enemies whether the New York Times likes it our not.

#30 Major

Well done that High School Newspaper!
All is not lost!
LOL
Regards

re: #35 RickZ

Also notice that throughout the article they refer to the dead Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as “Mr. Zarqawi.”

For the NYTimes, that's nothing new. Years ago, I remember reading a review of a Meatloaf concert. The first reference in the review was to Meatloaf. Thereafter, the Times reviewer referred to him as "Mr. Loaf."

They call every adult male "Mr.", president, terrorist, it doesn't matter. Very lame and annoying "style". Carrot Top would be "Mr. Top".

Not only printed in the NY Times; but re-printed HERE. Giving a boost to this nutty behavior.

Yes, Charles, this is tossing "red meat" around. This is what, when it met the public's nose, turned to one big stink.

As to Mr. Zarqwari, he is still dead.

And, Al-Qaeda is LOSING!

Even more to the point, all the money spent by the saud's on terror, has yet to have a big payoff.

While in Israel, Condi Rice's reputation is not the only way zooming down the toilet. Seems Tzipi Livni grabbed the wrong end of the horse. And, her career moves have her galloping away. Not that I care.

Only that following the news provides some real doozies to a lot of commotion. Where the unintended consequences, appear.

For the NY Times? Ad rates are down.

While over at ABC, per Drudge, IMUS is coming back STRONG.

You just can't invent "consequences."

Pay attention.

#38:

Is Hillary "Mr. Clinton" then?

I'm sorry but what is the big deal again? The NYT stealing a story from Rusty Shackleford is not the same as the NYT ruining a Federal investigation. And Rusty Shackleford is not a Federal agent. He's just whining that he lost a big story. Sorry Rusty, but it's not treason to steal someone else's story. It happens all the time in the news business.

re: #36 chinesearithmetic

Our country will defeat our enemies whether the New York Times likes it our not.

Rest assured, they will NOT like it...

JAFLW

re: #40 MajorGeneralWinfieldScottHancock

#38:

Is Hillary "Mr. Clinton" then?

Obviously!

JAFLW

re: #17 djs713

A Freeper added the comment below.

The terrorist site is called [Link: inshallahshaheed.muslimpad.com...]
IP address: 70.84.110.84

Internet Service Provider:

OrgName: ThePlanet.com Internet Services, Inc.

OrgID: TPCM

Address: 1333 North Stemmons Freeway

Address: Suite 110

City: Dallas S

tateProv: TX

PostalCode: 75207

Country: US

That appears to be a favorite hosting site among the jihadis, there are or were other sites there besides these.

As a precautionary measure it probably would be best not to post info on this creep.

Send it to DOJ instead.

re: #41 marwan's daughter

I'm sorry but what is the big deal again? The NYT stealing a story from Rusty Shackleford is not the same as the NYT ruining a Federal investigation. And Rusty Shackleford is not a Federal agent. He's just whining that he lost a big story. Sorry Rusty, but it's not treason to steal someone else's story. It happens all the time in the news business.

You just don't get it do you!

It is not about the story.

re: #33 Is it me?

treason became cheap here when jane fonda was not tired for it.

the democrat party has been committing treason for over 60 years

re: #39 Carol Herman

i do not beleive you understand the goals of the terrorist and the goals of the saudis

the terrorist do not really care about us
they want their califate back

the saudis want to stay in power
they are and have us to protect them

I remember when The Ignored Puzzle Pieces of Knowledge site was up and running.

Too bad it was taken down, as it provided any who visited a unique insight into one Muslim fundamentalist's mind.

It would have been a great site to cite at the upcoming Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week events.

Here are some highlights from his 'Open Letter To Keith Ellison' of last year:

Dear Keith Ellison,

I hope this message reaches to you and no one else as I will be addressing you from the Islamic perspective. If this is being read by someone else, I kindly ask you to pass this message to Keith Ellison as this is very important for me in my religion to make a few points clear to Mr. Keith Ellison.

Keith, I am not going to make this too long, so I’m going to speak in a straightforward fashion; and I would like if you can respond to my statements and questions so that it becomes clear to me on where you stand after the proofs have been shown to you.

First point: Do you judge by the book of Allah (i.e., Qur’an) or do you judge by what you think is correct? If your answer is that it is the Qur’an that you judge by – and I’ll assume this since you took on oath on the Qur’an in public – then how will you answer to Allah on the Day of Judgment that you made Halaal what He made Haraam? One example is Homosexuality. I am sure you know that in the Religion of Islam, homosexuality is Haraam and there are strict capital punishments in the Shari’ah against it. So what will you tell Allah, O Keith, on the Day where the hair of a child will turn grey because of the Great Fear? What will you tell the Lord of the Worlds, O Keith, on a Day where people will be drowning in their sweat? What will you tell Allah, O Keith, on a Day where men will be dragged onto spikes that will pierce through their skin and will be thrown into the Hellfire in front of everybody, humiliated and disgraced?

Second point: If you say that you judge according to what you think is correct, then I ask you – O Keith – how do you respond to the statements of your Lord (and please carefully read each verse of Qur’an that I quote and think about where you stand in regards to each and every verse):

[...]

And please, if you are going to quote a Scholar to explain these verses, quote a Classical Scholar; or better yet, quote a Sahabi (Companion of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)). Why do I say that? Because most of the Modern day Scholars interpret the Qur’an out of fear of Allah’s Creation – that is, men. So what good are these people who lie about the words of Allah?
If you can’t pull out any words of the Scholars, then I ask you, what do you think these verses imply? Do they not imply that if you judge by other than the Shari’ah, you have earned Allah’s Anger? Take a hint: Look at the repetitiveness. After you tell me, I’ll tell you the correct meaning of these verses according to the Classical Scholars.

Third point: What proof do you have from Qur’an and Sunnah that it is Islamic for you to participate in the Parliament, knowing that they pass judgments that go against the Shari’ah of Allah? How can you obey them in some of the matter, when you know that they actually hate your Religion? And know that they indeed hate your Religion simply because they hate Jihad (fighting), and Jihad is part of our Religion; don’t believe me? Then stand up in Parliament or make it clear in a public speech and say that you agree to the words of Qur’an 100% and that you agree with the verses from Surah al-Anfaal (chapter 8), and Surah at-Taubah (chapter 9) and also that you agree with the following verse because Allah has ordained it and He is absolutely correct:

Fourth Point: And this point is advice from me to you. How can you take the non-Muslims as your protectors, helpers, friends, judges, law-givers, law-makers, law-deciders, when Allah had forbidden it?

If he really wants to help, he should try martyrdom.

why are these guys showing up in my city?!?

Well, please don't flame me, BUT--

With Bush pushing the "religion of Peace" and Homeland Security dedicating its resources ensuring that no traveling nun goes unfrisked, I'd just as soon see the NYT take it to the streets as to the government.

Bush won't talk to the American people about the Islamofascist danger. It's a huge failing of his administration. The Islamofascists, however, will. I say that video gets out a vital message that Bush has been trying to downplay.

The Bergen County Record wishes it were the New York Times:

The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is monitoring a number of northern New Jersey residents with ties to Al Qaeda, according to a report.
Federal counterterrorism officials in New Jersey told the Record of Bergen County that agents have disrupted their activities and deported several.

The NYT was also one of the very few newspapers in the country to say NOTHING about President Bush's decision to posthumously award the CMOH to Lt Michael Murphy last week.

The NYT was also the ONLY NYC-area paper to carry zero news on this very news-worthy and important story. Lt Murphy was from Long Island, New York.

Even President Bush asked the NYT NOT TO PUBLISH their story about the SWIFT process, the financial tracking methodology and network used to find and disrupt terrorist financing activities through international money and bank transfers.

The NYT ignored him, too.

I haven't bought a NYT in years. I stopped years ago after they ran an editorial entitled "Bigotry on Parade" -- an opinion piece which called into question why there was a St Patrick's Day Parade in NYC.

I've never forgotten that. And I guess I never will.

The Wall Street Journal is far better paper with far more accurate reporting. They've had my morning paper business for so long now that I can't remember when I switched.

.

.

Didn't this sort of thing used to be treated as treason? In WW2 it woulda been...

If we arrested the ones writing that NYT article for treason, you can bet it would make NYT think twice about publishing another one like this, and maybe make some other newspapers think twice, as well.

Sadly, we don't have the guts. Under Giuliani we might, though.

Unless Dr. Shackleford was funneling his info on Inshallahshitheed to Homeland Security, the FBI or the Attorney General, I don't see how the NYT should be charged with treason.

re: #57 marwan's daughter

Agreed. To the best of our knowledge, it's not like some other Web site was funneling info to the FBI. If anything, the Times did we we would all hope to see— they publicized the activities of a kid who has been brainwashed by terrorists, put it on the front page and called his activities and views "extreme".