Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.
Charles, this ought to be interesting, since Mitt Romney has picked up a couple of notable endorsements from evangelicals and fundamentalists. It's all a matter of who they believe can beat Hillary.
I'm afraid Hunter doesn't have a chance. I think he'd be a great president. Perhaps this campaign will introduce him to the American people. I certainly hope so.
I'm afraid Hunter doesn't have a chance. I think he'd be a great president. Perhaps this campaign will introduce him to the American people. I certainly hope so.
I know, but every vote Hunter gets in the primaries is a vote for a party shift to the right, and getting more conservative platform planks.
Go Rudy. I can't say that Robertson is my favorite person, but if it will influence social conservatives, good!
I'd consider myself a social conservative, and I don't consider Pat Robertson's opinion on any matter, or of any import.
Sometimes, I think I understand how the "black community" feels when Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are consistently (s)elected as speaking for them.
Robertson says some flat-out stupid things sometimes, and sometimes he says out loud things that lots of other people are just thinking - like how somebody ought to whack Chavez.
I'm afraid Hunter doesn't have a chance. I think he'd be a great president. Perhaps this campaign will introduce him to the American people. I certainly hope so.
I'm afraid Hunter doesn't have a chance. I think he'd be a great president. Perhaps this campaign will introduce him to the American people. I certainly hope so.
Middling well, thank you. We will be grandparents in February, so there is that excitement. Hope you and yours are well.
I am still hoping for a chance to vote for Duncan Hunter, at least in the primary. Having this election decided already has me somewhat depressed. Of course, I went and voted in the Lost Cause election yesterday, so maybe it's just my wallet giving me these shooting pains in my lower regions.
Middling well, thank you. We will be grandparents in February, so there is that excitement. Hope you and yours are well.
I am still hoping for a chance to vote for Duncan Hunter, at least in the primary. Having this election decided already has me somewhat depressed. Of course, I went and voted in the Lost Cause election yesterday, so maybe it's just my wallet giving me these shooting pains in my lower regions.
WA State did pretty well, we had a bit of tax revolt up here. Big rail and transit package went down, allow school levies a simple majority went down, legislative tax increases required to have a super majority won.
Ward, you're right about Pat. And one of the signs of maturity is the ability to not have to blurt out every stray thought. Pat, by that measure, needs to grow up.
I think Pat is selected as a spokesman by the media to make "me" look bad. They have a lot of tar, and some big brushes.
Pat Robertson may be hard to tolerate but he's savy. He knows that a Hillary presidency certainly won't do his causes any good. Some of the other evangelicals better wake up and smell the coffee.
Middling well, thank you. We will be grandparents in February, so there is that excitement. Hope you and yours are well.
I am still hoping for a chance to vote for Duncan Hunter, at least in the primary. Having this election decided already has me somewhat depressed. Of course, I went and voted in the Lost Cause election yesterday, so maybe it's just my wallet giving me these shooting pains in my lower regions.
I know what you mean re: Hunter and yesterday's lost cause elections. Well, at least Prop 3 passed! Now if we can just get the caps down to 3%!
Actually, the one concern I have about Rudy is that I question if he'll be strong enough on border issues. I don't see how he can justify a weak stand on border security and a strong position in the war on Islamofascism.
Charles, I am not a big fan of Robertson either, but he isn't a total nutcase. Look into his charitable work. An idiotarian shakes down the gov't and big corporations for money. Robertson gets people to give him money, then he distritbutes cash and goods to those in need.
I can understand your position. My kids are in their 30's and have been married for more than five years. I AN READY TO BE A GRANDMOTHER! I can't wait for our new little one.
re: #34 Ward Cleaver
I think Pat is selected as a spokesman by the media to make "me" look bad. They have a lot of tar, and some big brushes.
I think you're right. I barely know who he is, don't know what he does and can't really recall anything he's said, but if I identify myself as an evangelical Christian, then somehow he and I are some monolithic bloc in some people's minds.
Ron Paul just announced he's gotten the key Osama endorsement, along with a pledge of $5 million.
It is not true, however, that Ron Paul has gotten endorsed by aliens. I've been busy keeping the aliens from interfering; unfortunately, Kucinich saw my ship.
Charles, I am not a big fan of Robertson either, but he isn't a total nutcase. Look into his charitable work. An idiotarian shakes down the gov't and big corporations for money. Robertson gets people to give him money, then he distritbutes cash and goods to those in need.
I agree, he's a mixed bag. He's definitely not a bad guy, he just says some stupid things.
I'd rather have a republican president to criticize than a democratic president to fear. It's going to get ugly from here on until the election, But if we stay united, we can win. There's a lot at stake. Go Rudy.
Take a look at what happen to Bush and McCain the last 4 years after they went off for the wage slaves and am-nasty, if Rudy does get elected and goes off like his history says he will, the very same thing will happen once more, do we want 4 more years of grid lock in the congress and the borders still open. Until Rudy comes to the table and signs in blood that he will close the borders and end the wage slave invasion all you are doing is allowing 4 more years of sinking in the same mud.
OMG. Taxfree Killer's Best Post EVAR.
I agree, obviously. I can't see how Robertson can reconcile a Christian view on [the topic which shall not be mentioned at LGF] and Rudy. And the border thing? and some other leftist stuff. Rudy is no conservative, and if you're ok with that, then that's up to you. I'm not bashing any Rudy folks...but I just don't agree with everything the guy believes in. But I will go and vote for him if he's the only thing between Hillary and the White House.
Robertson is looking to get back into the precincts of power, and understands that Rudy will fight the Islamofascists more potently than most of the other "serious" candidates.
And that's because you guys signed that incredibly stupid "no cloaking technology... for us" treaty with the Romulans. I warned you about that.
Blame the civilian politicians; I worked hard to steal that cloaking device and turn it over to Scotty, and the politicians decided that we'd never get to use it.
I'm not a big fan of Rudy, but I'll never forget him running for his life with his fellow New Yorkers on 9/11, or when he told the Saudis to shove their check where the sun doesn't shine. And I won't forget the firemen and other first responders booing and cursing Hillary at the Concert for New York.
Plus, he never had his shot after cancer forced him to bow out in Round One of Giuliani vs. Clinton. High time for a rematch.
We have allowed rampant pornography on the Internet, and rampant secularism and the occult, etc. to be broadcast on television. We have permitted somewhere in the neighborhood of 35-40 million unborn babies to be slaughtered by our society.
(...)
We have insulted God at the highest level of our government. Then, we say, "Why does this happen?" It is happening because God Almighty is lifting His protection from us. Once that protection is gone, we are vulnerable because we are a free society.
A vindictive God killed innocent people to "teach" us a lesson? Why not put the blame on Bin Laden and the Islamofascists for the attacks?
And that's because you guys signed that incredibly stupid "no cloaking technology... for us" treaty with the Romulans. I warned you about that.
Blame the civilian politicians; I worked hard to steal that cloaking device and turn it over to Scotty, and the politicians decided that we'd never get to use it.
And then the frakking civilian politicians decided they were going to hand over a few of our worlds to the frakking Cardassians.
Take a look at what happen to Bush and McCain the last 4 years after they went off for the wage slaves and am-nasty, if Rudy does get elected and goes off like his history says he will, the very same thing will happen once more, do we want 4 more years of grid lock in the congress and the borders still open. Until Rudy comes to the table and signs in blood that he will close the borders and end the wage slave invasion all you are doing is allowing 4 more years of sinking in the same mud.
OMG. Taxfree Killer's Best Post EVAR.
I agree, obviously. I can't see how Robertson can reconcile a Christian view on [the topic which shall not be mentioned at LGF] and Rudy. And the border thing? and some other leftist stuff. Rudy is no conservative, and if you're ok with that, then that's up to you. I'm not bashing any Rudy folks...but I just don't agree with everything the guy believes in. But I will go and vote for him if he's the only thing between Hillary and the White House.
Dittos. I'd even consider voting for Satan over Hillary. But I'd really have to think about it.
Even as a social conservative, this means nothing to me personally, but is interesting. I was bothered by some evangelicals almost hoping for a Hillary presidency and the "bunker mentality" that would come of knowing everyone is against you and the trying times that would bring. I'm not there at all.
As one of those "social conservatives" everybody talks about, I am actually not a big fan of Pat Robertson. He sticks his big foot in his even bigger mouth a bit too much for my taste.
The Pakistanis had not only “crossed the line” as the saying went in Washington’s nuclear precincts. They had actually prepared bombs for delivery. More importantly, in relation to the current crisis, the whole scenario had been carried out without Bhutto even knowing what had happened.
“I think it is criminal that the Prime Minister, who is ultimately responsible in the eyes of the people and in the eyes of history, should not be taken into confidence on such a major issue.” She told NBC two years later. “I did not know.”
Bhutto in fact had not just been Prime Minister. She was Defense Minister and Atomic Energy Minister as well.
The decision had been taken by the Army chief of staff, Mirza Aslam Beg, and the country’s president, Ghulam Ishaq Khan. The presidency then, unlike now, was more of a ceremonial post. Both had been proponents of the Pakistani bomb program, which ironically had been started by Bhutto’s father when he had been prime minister. Khan in fact had run the program.
Bhutto also found out in a most unorthodox way. In late June, two long time American friends of hers had come to Islamabad to tell her what happened. Peter Galbraith, then the south Asia specialist on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Mark Siegel, her Washington lobbyist, took her to a garden outside her offices in the Pakistani capital to inform her.
The news Galbraith and Siegel had delivered took Bhutto by surprise, but she knew the consequences. The United States now had the proof it needed to cut off aid to Pakistan under a law called the Pressler Amendment, and ultimately the US did just that.
A few weeks later, the US ambassador delievered the news to her. Robert Oakley informed her that US law required a cutoff in aid to Pakistan if it possessed a “nuclear explosive device” and demanded that Pakistan reverse the process.
Around the same time, US officials flew to Islamabad while Bhutto was on a state visit to the Gulf States to warn Ishaq Khan and Beg there was no way Pakistan could win a war with India and that continued nuclear brinksmanship would risk a catastrophe.
Bhutto, unaware of the US meeting, contacted Ishaq Khan to relay Oakley’s warning and three times called for a meeting of the top-secret committee that ran the nuclear weapons program. Each time Ishaq Khan said he would get back to her. She also asked Beg for an explanation as well and he promised one would be forthcoming.
Neither happened, but on Aug. 6, less than three months after Pakistan had begun the process of building a bomb, Bhutto was deposed. With the world’s attention then focused on Saddam Hussein’s four-day old occupation of Kuwait, Ishaq Khan went on Pakistani television to denounce Bhutto’s government as corrupt and incompetent.
“I have no proof of this,” Bhutto later told NBC News, “but I feel that someone may have turned on the switch in the spring of 1990 to justify the dismissal of my government.” She called it a “nuclear coup.”
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Today, another one of the few remaining pieces is going to fall off, as he accepts the endorsement of Pat Robertson.
Rudy, I think, will be tough on national security, which is good...but tends to be socially liberal, which some conservative purisits may not like, but it is a hell of a lot better than Hillary or Obama...
Also, I think he would clean Hillary's clock in the general election. After her last debacle of a performace on the Dem debate, the mask is slipping off. She has no idea what she is talking about if it isnt prescripted...so Tim Russert asks a legit question, and "wahaaahaaa you guys are all ganging up on me because I am a woman"...
Yeah, that lady is capable of making tough decisions in a time of war...God help us if she wins...
I'm an evangelical and pro life.
But I also have common sense and reason..thanks to LGF and Oriana Fallaci.
I'm a semi evangelical lapsed Catholic who is pro life. I also have common sense and reason. I know that if the religious right says home or throws their vote to a third party candidate then we won't have a country at all. Sometimes you have to take the longer path toward a goal.
Robertson is looking to get back into the precincts of power, and understands that Rudy will fight the Islamofascists more potently than most of the other "serious" candidates.
Right. The important take-home point here is that Robertson's acceptance of Giuliani indicates a shift from recent trend among conservative Christians to eschew centrist Republicans or simply not vote. It indicates that some in the Christian leadership understand the priority of combating Islamic terror and that they can compromise on a candidate who may not share their views on some issues (abortion, gay marriag, divorce, etc). This is important and most welcome, whether you like Pat Robertson or not.
BTW, those of you reaming on Robertson too much, I'm not a huge fan, but...
Operation Blessing International is a nonprofit organization that provides humanitarian aid in the form of food, clothing, medicine, and financial assistance to help disadvantaged people and disaster victims throughout the world.
Operation Blessing has provided nearly $500 million in aid -- which includes Operation Blessing donations and matching funds from other organizations -- to assist nearly 130 million people in 50 states and 71 foreign countries.
Robertson had made some odd claims about 9/11 IIRC, and was properly castigated for them. It will be interesting to see how Rudy deals with that.
What this does suggest is that religious conservatives aren't going to throw support to a third party candidate knowing that such a move might result in a leftist elected President as some suggested.
Then again, I don't know how much difference this will make in the end. Most often, endorsements aren't worth more than the paper they're written on.
"The overriding issue before the American people, is the defense of our population against the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists," Robertson told the National Press Club audience.
I'm glad somebody is calling them on their bloodlust.
That is good news & suprising. Robertson might be able to help fight the notion of Evangelicals staying home for the General Election.
But I believe that Rudy should try real hard to limit public apperances with him.
I think that most people including me consider Pat Robertson to be a loon.
The Kossacks can't help but blame Rudy for failures with technical equipment that had been problems for years. Oh, and Bloomberg's still dealing with the radio issue - it isn't quite completely fixed yet.
re: #86 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
"I'd even consider voting for Satan over Hilliary"
Well only after seeing them both on stage together and I was sure it wasn't Hilliary incognito!
Let's see if he gets an endorsement from the Minutement!
/wishing...
How can you ever think/wish that into exsistance? If he gets an endorsement from the Minutemen, I'm just going to give up. On everything. Seriously.
Oh, that's an easy one. 77% of the population wants something/anything done about immigration? Not getting some blanket amnesty or DREAM act or licenses or something else for illegals shoved down our throats? And Rudy likes his sanctuary cities? And the minutemen are only observers and trying to protect people's property? Maybe you don't live in a city or town that is overrun with "undocumented workers", haven't had somebody run into you and just split, or know anybody in a border area who's had their property vandalized, used as a bathroom or kitchen as they were passing through.
Sorry, but this to me and an awful lot of people I know is priority #1 right now, stop the flow and enforce current laws is all we ask.
Butt simple.
I held my nose and voted for a Repub in our Governor's race (KY) yesterday that I felt wasn't the best. ( Many Repubs stayed home) He lost and the state is back in the Dems hands. Although I feel Rudy is not the best we could do, I will vote for him if he is the nominee. I just hope the same result doesn't repeat itself.
Bhutto's playing with fire. She thinks she can handle the Islamofascists by joining with them to sideline Musharraf and the military. I think the best course is for her to follow Sharif back into exile.
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Today, another one of the few remaining pieces is going to fall off, as he accepts the endorsement of Pat Robertson.
They really don't like Rudy.
Rudy Derangement Syndrome has a long history in NYC. The newcomers to this pathology bring their BDS reserves.
So, gee, do ya think Robertson is hitching his horse to the man who appears most like to win the nomination? Robertson--a rank and cynical opportunist? If Robertson wants to endorse Giuliani, fine. I would be even more concerned if Rudy in some fashion endorsed Robertson his God-Hates-and-Hurts-People rhetoric. Robertson is like a Fred Phelps Lite who condemns people on television instead of at funerals.
I'm kind of with Tammy on this. "Opportunist" was what I was thinking too.
Rudy, I think, will be tough on national security, which is good...but tends to be socially liberal, which some conservative purisits may not like, but it is a hell of a lot better than Hillary or Obama...
Also, I think he would clean Hillary's clock in the general election. After her last debacle of a performace on the Dem debate, the mask is slipping off. She has no idea what she is talking about if it isnt prescripted...so Tim Russert asks a legit question, and "wahaaahaaa you guys are all ganging up on me because I am a woman"...
Yeah, that lady is capable of making tough decisions in a time of war...God help us if she wins...
It appears that the Donks believe that being unfit to hold an office is a qualification for an elected office.
Pat Robertson also has a history of some shady dealings with Liberian gangster & genocider Charles Taylor over diamond mines. And guess who else is involved with Liberian diamond smuggling? Al Qaeda.
IMHO, Pat Robertson is a nasty evil son of a bitch and a con man.
Take a look at what happen to Bush and McCain the last 4 years after they went off for the wage slaves and am-nasty, if Rudy does get elected and goes off like his history says he will, the very same thing will happen once more, do we want 4 more years of grid lock in the congress and the borders still open. Until Rudy comes to the table and signs in blood that he will close the borders and end the wage slave invasion all you are doing is allowing 4 more years of sinking in the same mud.
OMG. Taxfree Killer's Best Post EVAR.
I agree, obviously. I can't see how Robertson can reconcile a Christian view on [the topic which shall not be mentioned at LGF] and Rudy. And the border thing? and some other leftist stuff. Rudy is no conservative, and if you're ok with that, then that's up to you. I'm not bashing any Rudy folks...but I just don't agree with everything the guy believes in. But I will go and vote for him if he's the only thing between Hillary and the White House.
Dittos. I'd even consider voting for Satan over Hillary. But I'd really have to think about it.
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Today, another one of the few remaining pieces is going to fall off, as he accepts the endorsement of Pat Robertson.
They really don't like Rudy.
Rudy Derangement Syndrome has a long history in NYC. The newcomers to this pathology bring their BDS reserves.
This is big. I don't like Pat Robertson much better than Tammy Bruce does (even though I'm a bit of a social conservative), but this means that at least part of the evangelicals will hold their nose and vote for Rudy rather than vote a 3rd-party candidate (cfr. noises by James Dobson) or stay home.
Otherwise, we might as well start preparing for a Hillary presidency right now...
Keep in mind guys, Bush won 2004 in part because he had a boob like Jean-Fraud Ketchup running against him. Whatever your views about Hillary/Hildebeest, she is a dead serious contender.
If Rudy becomes president (please G-d), we'll have at least four more years of GDS on lefty-talk radio, Olbermann, Mathews, etc. But we ought to be used to it by now. Honestly, we'd miss it. Donchathink?
Apparantly, it was a surprise, and Rudy's fault, that portable radios didn't work deep inside a large concrete & steel structure. Every fire department in the world struggles with that problem every day.
Oh, I completely agree. And in a way, by posting the endorsement on his website, Rudy is also being an opportunist. But... there's a lot at stake here.
What is with all the pouting and sour grapes from Tammy Bruce? Pat Robertson is simply about like 60 or 70 percent of conservatives, he is able to distinguish what he would like, from what can be done. And Fighting the Islamofacists is number one, without that all the arguments about social issues mean nothing. And the whining that some Christians make the same argument that senators of Rome made; that the decline and destruction of a civilization comes from within first I see as an anti-Christian bias, it is not a honest look at what each individual has done with their "so called," freedom, as history repeatedly shows that any culture that loses its founding morality, loses everything to the barbarian.
It looks to me she is upset that Robertson is not the crazy fundamentalist she had painted into a corner, and that makes her madder than if those that will not fight the Islamofacists win the election. So much for the sophistication of the secularists.
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Actually the terrorists crashing planes into the WTC is what cost "hundreds of lives", not failed radios.
Being that I am in school on the weekends and work fulltime, havent been following the political scene to much lately. First I have heard of the...not getting much media attention I guess...
Pat Robertson also has a history of some shady dealings with Liberian gangster & genocider Charles Taylor over diamond mines. And guess who else is involved with Liberian diamond smuggling? Al Qaeda.
IMHO, Pat Robertson is a nasty evil son of a bitch and a con man.
Back in the day, when Charlie Taylor was teamed with Roy Jefferson, they were the best WR tandem in the NFL.
Good G*d, I can't take any more. I used to love Rudy... now this! First, I read about Rudy's alleged (gay) child molesting Catholic buddy, and now the superfreak poster boy of the far right is tagging on his coat tails. I wouldn't cross the street to piss on Pat Robertson. Laugh at him - sure - but I find the man utterly revolting. Every time I see or hear him I taste bile in my mouth.
If Rudy dipped himself in sh*t I don't think I could find him less appealing at the moment.
Let's see if he gets an endorsement from the Minutement!
/wishing...
How can you ever think/wish that into exsistance? If he gets an endorsement from the Minutemen, I'm just going to give up. On everything. Seriously.
Oh, that's an easy one. 77% of the population wants something/anything done about immigration? Not getting some blanket amnesty or DREAM act or licenses or something else for illegals shoved down our throats? And Rudy likes his sanctuary cities? And the minutemen are only observers and trying to protect people's property? Maybe you don't live in a city or town that is overrun with "undocumented workers", haven't had somebody run into you and just split, or know anybody in a border area who's had their property vandalized, used as a bathroom or kitchen as they were passing through.
Sorry, but this to me and an awful lot of people I know is priority #1 right now, stop the flow and enforce current laws is all we ask.
Butt simple.
Whoa there. I think you misread me.
The Minutemen are the very meaning of Liberty. I'm all for them, and I support them every chance I get...I don't know what your post is about - but I think you took me the wrong way.
Rudy is anything but a "close the borders" candidate, and if a group as conservative as the Minutemen gives their weight to a candidate that is ok with harboring illegal aliens, then I don't see any reason to fight for what I believe to be right anymore. it's over. ya know?
Maybe I worded it wrong, I dunno.
You know, I don't like to make too many posts with "you know, my candidate is...", but Fred would do everything we're hoping(some of us anyway) for in a President. He's just not as flashy and polished as Rudy - but I believe he'd be just as good at mopping the floor with Hillary as Rudy would be. I guess Americans want a hollywood President though, and substance is an afterthought for alot of people out there on the left and the right.
Anyway, I hope I cleared that up for ya. If I had the money, I'd be out there with them, helping them defend the border in person. I believe in what they are doing, and I wish the government believed in it more.
Well, we could always hope for a Hunter (my choice for POTUS) and Thompson ticket, just to screw with the moonbats' cranial matter (can't call that stuff that keeps their eyes from falling into their skull "brains", now can we?)
HunterfThompson for President! Real "Fear and Loathing" in the White House!
"...dude, waitaminnet, izzent that Thompson mofo dead? I dunno either, Moonbeam. Hey, Sean, don't Bogart the bong, gimme it...and some Cheetos; I got a righteous hunger going on here."
President George W. Bush called Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Wednesday to deplore a suicide bombing that killed dozens of children and lawmakers gathered at a sugar factory in Baghlan province north of Kabul
Pat Robertson also has a history of some shady dealings with Liberian gangster & genocider Charles Taylor over diamond mines. And guess who else is involved with Liberian diamond smuggling? Al Qaeda.
IMHO, Pat Robertson is a nasty evil son of a bitch and a con man.
Back in the day, when Charlie Taylor was teamed with Roy Jefferson, they were the best WR tandem in the NFL.
It ought to be obvious, but I'll say it anyway, Robertson's endorsement means others in the Christian right will be able to vote for Rudy, and not stay home on election day. Or not vote a 3rd party. That's a tremendous force, and could sway the election in the right direction.
If you want purity, vote...well...you can't. No one is pure. Except for the fantasy candidate in my head. (/s, I guess)
OT
Another ABM defense. This one a double hit. This is the Aegis or naval anti-ballistic missile system. Last month the land based AF system had a huge hit when it took out an intermediate range missile mimicking the NorKor stuff.
Wow! The demons come out, I thought Halloween was over. So what sort of Christian is acceptable? One that never confronts this sick society on its rampant immorality? Heck let the ACLU rule!
I have mixed feelings about this endorsement. I like Rudy and if this helps him get the nomination, then so be it. I don't like the Dem choices that much and Obama is a proto-dhimmi carter.
I like the fact that Rudy is more of a traditional republican and not one of these "the U.S. is a chirstian nation, founded by christians, and needs to have good christians on the bench." GOP'ers like Brownback and DeLay.
That's what worries me in the long run if Rudy is elected president. It seems that perhaps some on the far right are willing to sleep with the enemy (Rudy's pro-choice, more liberal social stances) so long as the next batch of SCOTUS nominees subscribe to the activist mindset that is constitutional originalism (See Thomas & Scalia).
Now, maybe I will get burned for this assertion since some republicans think these two are sweeter than a piping hot loaf of cinnamon bread, but one question I want to pose for those that adhere to this belief system, how the heck does an originalist, strict constructionist judge know exactly what the founders intended? Was he or she there at the time the ink was drying on the constitution? Did they have personal, or in this case, telepathic, discussions with the ghosts of Adams, Madison, Jefferson, and Gerry? I'm just tossing some ideas out here but I think that this school of constitutional thought is just as prone to activism and abuse as more liberal constitutional ideas.
Anyway, I'm digressing, I think there is some agreement between Robertson and Rudy regarding SCOTUS nominees and I'd be curious as to what that is. I was hoping that the next GOP candidate would get down to the business of defending this country than worrying about what some couple was doing in their bedroom.
This endorsement does not surprise me. I've seen a few vids of his CBN guest interviews with anti-jihad experts. He's far more clueful about the islamists than most of his peers. Certainly more than Ms Rice.
I held my nose and voted for a Repub in our Governor's race (KY) yesterday that I felt wasn't the best. ( Many Repubs stayed home) He lost and the state is back in the Dems hands. Although I feel Rudy is not the best we could do, I will vote for him if he is the nominee. I just hope the same result doesn't repeat itself.
Top
1SG, you had better get that state back into Repub hands before I retire for the second time and move there!
In a letter to Osama bin Laden, published in the Kuwaiti daily Al-Watan, Kuwaiti MP Dr. Walid Al-Tabatabai, from the Islamic bloc in the Kuwaiti parliament, praised the jihad fighters' activities and advised him on avoiding mistakes in the jihad that Al-Qaeda is waging.
Al-Tabatabai's letter, which came in response to the speech by bin Laden that was broadcast on September 11, 2007, appealed to bin Laden to distinguish between fighting the American invader and attacking the Muslims, and to refrain from random operations which harmed innocents because such operations damaged the image of jihad and sabotaged the spreading of Islam. Al-Tabatabai also called on bin Laden to consult with Muslim clerics in order to reassess Al-Qaeda's activities and avoid mistakes in the future.
[...]
Al-Tabatai wrote: "...The author of this letter (i.e. Tabatabai) is one of those who appreciate and honor the jihad that you carried out during the liberation of Afghanistan from the Soviet Russian invasion... Your most recent speech, which the media broadcast several days ago, aroused in me many questions regarding its negative impact, considering that it was lacking a political dimension. Unfortunately, the speech was like a lifesaver to the American president, who is dealing with great internal pressures to withdraw his forces from Iraq... Thus, commentators said that Bush found what he wished for in this speech, since [bin Laden] provided [Bush] with clear-cut evidence of [the need] to restrain his adversaries: That is, the continued presence of the U.S. military in Iraq is for the sake of defending the entire American people from the ongoing Al-Qaeda threat... Your speech damaged all the efforts underway to speed up the American exit from Iraq – unless you are not interested in this!
"Also, Sheikh Osama, how can you preach to the American people [to join] Islam when you boldly acknowledge that you are behind the killing of thousands of them in 9/11? Don't you think... that this will arouse in them revulsion towards Islam? You must either call on them to join Islam by making them to want to, with beautiful words, or you must fight them. But when you declare war against them and fight them, and at the same time preach to them to join Islam – these two things do not sit well with each other; moreover, they will only increase [the Americans'] hostility towards the Muslims, their hatred of Islam, and their revulsion towards it."
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Today, another one of the few remaining pieces is going to fall off, as he accepts the endorsement of Pat Robertson.
Wow! The demons come out, I thought Halloween was over. So what sort of Christian is acceptable? One that never confronts this sick society on its rampant immorality? Heck let the ACLU rule!
Fine . . . let's do a Morality Background Check on EVERY potential Rudy voter. They can be the ones casting stones.
Sorry if someone else already pointed this out. In your first update you credit the video to AP, the post was actually written by Brian over at HotAir.
Oh, I meant to ask, why do the koslings think that Rudy should be responsible for radios that failed? He's not God, after all. He's not even the electronics engineer in charge of manufacturing the radio supply.
Is that the best they've got?
I'm starting to feel confident that we can win this election. Thanks, Kos. You always pick up my spirits.
Let's see if he gets an endorsement from the Minutement!/wishing...
How can you ever think/wish that into exsistance? If he gets an endorsement from the Minutemen, I'm just going to give up. On everything. Seriously.
Oh, that's an easy one. 77% of the population wants something/anything done about immigration? Not getting some blanket amnesty or DREAM act or licenses or something else for illegals shoved down our throats? And Rudy likes his sanctuary cities? And the minutemen are only observers and trying to protect people's property? Maybe you don't live in a city or town that is overrun with "undocumented workers", haven't had somebody run into you and just split, or know anybody in a border area who's had their property vandalized, used as a bathroom or kitchen as they were passing through.
Sorry, but this to me and an awful lot of people I know is priority #1 right now, stop the flow and enforce current laws is all we ask.
Butt simple.
If you look back at the Flanders White Power posts, you'll see the it looks like the Minutemen are connected with some White Power groups. They look like big boy scouts, but if they are into the White Power stuff, they're creeps in my book. What a let down.
Don't get me wrong, the man had no credibility on 9/11 to begin with. Between radios that failed, costing hundreds of lives, and his confusion of Yankee Stadium with ground zero, he doesn't have chinks in his 9/11 armor, he has entire pieces missing.
Actually the terrorists crashing planes into the WTC is what cost "hundreds of lives", not failed radios.
The whole radio think is a red herring. Comms within emergency services has been a long running "issue." Various areas of responsibility were allocated sections of the spectrum that was allocated to Local Agencies. The entire system grew up with all the agencies on different frequencies. The old Analog systems are not frequency agile, they weren't the computer control bases which can take the audio off one freq and move it to another.
When you are on different frequencies you can't talk to each other plan and simple.
Getting every one talking is highly complex and extremely complicated. You can't put everyone on a single freq, too many people talking. You can't give everyone a radio for every freq. Handhelds even high end have a limit of number of freqs. The is upgrading of the entire comms infrastructure, base stations, repeaters, comm centers.
It is only in the last decade with digital comms, computer controls that getting systems in place that really allow everyone involved is even possible. Actually getting the budgets, think 100s of millions for NYC, is another matter.
Last July 14, Alexandre Robert, a 15-year-old French-Swiss youth living in Dubai with his hotel-manager father, was offered a ride home by an Emirati acquaintance from a beach club, where he was with a French friend. In the car were two local men. According to Alexandre, he was placed in the middle back seat, while the men drove the teenagers beyond the neon-soaked skyline and into the desert, where the three local men took turns raping him at knifepoint in the dark. His French friend was ordered to wait outside the car, and has told police he was not attacked. When the men finally deposited the distraught boys back in the city, they threatened to attack Alexandre's family if he dared report them to the police.
Despite that, Dubai officials reported three times that the two suspects were not infected with the HIV virus, according to French diplomats, even though that appears to be untrue. A document released by government officials to French diplomats in August showed that one man had tested positive while in prison four years ago. Alexandre will receive word only in January whether he was infected during the alleged attack. "There is a lot of malfunctioning, but from where I do not know," says a French diplomat in Dubai, explaining the bungling over the AIDS tests. In late October, the French foreign ministry added a warning for travelers about crime in Dubai.
Iran-Martyrs-Ahmadinejad
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said here Wednesday that the country is more than ever in need of the culture of martyrdom, self-sacrifice and appreciation of martyrs, war veterans and the disabled.
Addressing a public gathering, President Ahmadinejad said culture of martyrdom and self-sacrifice would guarantee a bright prospect and prosperous life for the Iranian nation.
He said that the entire Iranian nation and mankind throughout history are indebted to martyrs, veterans and their bereaved families.
Elsewhere in his speech, Ahmadinejad said Iranian nation has today turned into a model for all the world nations and that's due to self-sacrifice and devotion of dear martyrs and war veterans.
Now, maybe I will get burned for this assertion since some republicans think these two are sweeter than a piping hot loaf of cinnamon bread, but one question I want to pose for those that adhere to this belief system, how the heck does an originalist, strict constructionist judge know exactly what the founders intended? Was he or she there at the time the ink was drying on the constitution? Did they have personal, or in this case, telepathic, discussions with the ghosts of Adams, Madison, Jefferson, and Gerry? I'm just tossing some ideas out here but I think that this school of constitutional thought is just as prone to activism and abuse as more liberal constitutional ideas.
A constructionist would have read the Federalists papers at least, to see the thought that went into the Constitution, he would be aware of the times and culture and the education of the framers. He would not pull whole cloth out of the Constitution such things as a penumbra emanates from the document, allowing you to pull anything out of your ass to validate a current viewpoint. Roe v Wade would have never happened under Constructionists, neither would the recent takings decision allowing government to seize property if they can get higher tax returns from the new owners etc...
Pat Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden. I hope people forget about this endorsement by 2008, because this IS a kiss of death. Good thing he endorsed Rudy early.
Pat Robertson. Politics makes strange bedfellows, for sure.
His endorsement should carry no weight. His opinions should carry no weight. But we cannot afford to be so pure that we only accept support from those whose thinking is aligned 100% with our own, and is therefore correct across the board.
Now, maybe I will get burned for this assertion since some republicans think these two are sweeter than a piping hot loaf of cinnamon bread, but one question I want to pose for those that adhere to this belief system, how the heck does an originalist, strict constructionist judge know exactly what the founders intended? Was he or she there at the time the ink was drying on the constitution? Did they have personal, or in this case, telepathic, discussions with the ghosts of Adams, Madison, Jefferson, and Gerry? I'm just tossing some ideas out here but I think that this school of constitutional thought is just as prone to activism and abuse as more liberal constitutional ideas.
News Flash: the Constitution isn't the only historical document that exists.
Most (all?) of those guys wrote a lot of stuff to indicate what they thought and the reasoning for various things. But, reading what all those dead-guys wrote is a lot harder than just making it up as you go to suite the current fancy.
It ought to be obvious, but I'll say it anyway, Robertson's endorsement means others in the Christian right will be able to vote for Rudy, and not stay home on election day.
Well, not exactly. It doens't "mean ...will be able to vote for Rudy"...i think some of you think that Christians sit around and wait to be told who to vote for and what to do and what dessert to ahve with dinner. Well, it just ain't so, folks. We are thinking individuals, most of us anyway :), and it simply means that Robertson thinks Rudy is the man for the job.
If you think Christians sit around and wait to be told what they can and cannot do( with perhaps one notable exception with regard to condoms, abortion, and what day you should eat fish ;) LOL ), you're a bit ignorant about the way most Christians view their Pastors/ministers. They are leaders, and if they're good honest men(or women) we look up to them, but we don't get "marching orders" from them. At least not the Christians I know that are actively involved with a church, or actively involved with their faith on a personal level. Of course, I'm just speaking on what I know...maybe there are some out there that wouldn't vote for Hunter unless they were told to...but I doubt that number could be very large if it exists at all. We're not muslims you know...we don't go to church on Friday to find out who we're supposed to love or hate that week.
i'd think Lizards would know better. *shrug...oh well.
Meanwhile the Hillary slide is real, and no a statistical coincidence. Down 10 points in NH. It appears that her evasive answers and attempt to blame the males of the species for her evasiveness has backfired. Now that is far more interesting than this story.
[Link: www.politico.com...]
After all, we don't know the background. For all I know Robertson plays golf with Rudy. It will make no difference to the electorate.
Oh, I meant to ask, why do the koslings think that Rudy should be responsible for radios that failed? He's not God, after all. He's not even the electronics engineer in charge of manufacturing the radio supply.
Is that the best they've got?
I'm starting to feel confident that we can win this election. Thanks, Kos. You always pick up my spirits.
The left, and especially the democratic candidate, will bring up all the dirt on Rudy; his personal life, divorces, etc. It'll get ugly. What they hate the most about him is that he did a very good and capable job in New York. His personal life may be messy, but he's a leader. And the democrats don't have someone to match Rudy's abilities. Watch for the mud.
So far I have no candidate for the '08 election that I can fully support. This doesn't help the matter for me either. I'm not sure this is a good move for Rudy. MHO is that this is just one more thing he will have to defend in the MSM.
Once again we, as a people are left with a choice of the "least of evils".
at Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden.
Keep your finger out of the trigger guard until ready to fire.
Alway know your backstop.
Treat every gun as if it were loaded.
Keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction when not in use.
(At least keep your finger out of the trigger guard, Ms. Bruce...)
I support Giuliani ( have voted for him three times so far), but there is one thing that he did that really disgusts me.
There was a police shooting- a group of four NYPD officers surrounded a mentally disturbed Hasidic man in Brooklyn,NY in front of his apartment The guy was holding a very small hammer over his head - people had complained about him, but he hadn't attacked anyone violently.
He didn't rush the cops or anything- he was standing motionless when they all opened fire at point blank range- many witnesses.
No cops were punished in any way, and Giuliani supported the cops 100%, never even hinting at the possibility that anyone might have done anything wrong. Hard to recall a worse miscarriage of justice - and there was no Jewish Sharpton to lead any marches or anything, of course.
The brave Muslim rapists of the pubescent French boy did their deed in a perfectly halal manner, in strict accordance with the Koran & its multiplicity of edicts about intercourse with slave girls, goats, and young boys.
The lovely houris of heaven are beautiful young boys there to serve the carnal desires of jihadists.
Let's see if he gets an endorsement from the Minutement!/wishing...
How can you ever think/wish that into exsistance? If he gets an endorsement from the Minutemen, I'm just going to give up. On everything. Seriously.
Oh, that's an easy one. 77% of the population wants something/anything done about immigration? Not getting some blanket amnesty or DREAM act or licenses or something else for illegals shoved down our throats? And Rudy likes his sanctuary cities? And the minutemen are only observers and trying to protect people's property? Maybe you don't live in a city or town that is overrun with "undocumented workers", haven't had somebody run into you and just split, or know anybody in a border area who's had their property vandalized, used as a bathroom or kitchen as they were passing through.
Sorry, but this to me and an awful lot of people I know is priority #1 right now, stop the flow and enforce current laws is all we ask.
Butt simple.
If you look back at the Flanders White Power posts, you'll see the it looks like the Minutemen are connected with some White Power groups. They look like big boy scouts, but if they are into the White Power stuff, they're creeps in my book. What a let down.
First I've heard of it. Do you mean " The Minutemen" the organization, or " the minutemen" the members?
MARRAKECH, Morocco (AP) - Interpol put five Iranians and a Lebanese man on its most-wanted list Wednesday in connection with a 1994 bombing that killed 85 people at a Jewish community center in Argentina.
Iranian delegates said the annual Interpol general assembly in Morocco voted 78-14, with 26 abstentions, to issue wanted notices for the six suspects.
"We have achieved something that we have been hoping for for a long time," said Alberto Nisman, the chief Argentine prosecutor in the case.
Argentine prosecutors alleged that Iranian officials orchestrated the bombing in Buenos Aires—Argentina's worst terror attack—and entrusted the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah with carrying it out.
No one has been convicted in Argentina in connection with the blast, in which a van stuffed with explosives leveled the seven-story Jewish center and shook Argentina's 200,000-strong Jewish community.
The Interpol vote became embroiled in Iran's broader tensions with the West, which stem in part from suspicions that Tehran is seeking to build nuclear weapons.
Iranian envoys had strongly objected to the wanted notices, accusing Israel and the United States of turning the international police agency into a political tool.
I cant see how that is positive, Pat Robertson is insane much like his pal jerry falwell, I cant imagine this endorsement having any weight except with his most extreme followers, who are just as crazy as he is...
at Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden.
Robertson is nutty, bin Laden is Evil.
There is no comparison.
True. But if Robertson had a following willing to kill infidels and install a worldwide theocracy, he would cross the line into evil. He is dangerously close to that line now. What keeps him from crossing it is his lack of a following.
Fine . . . let's do a Morality Background Check on EVERY potential Rudy voter. They can be the ones casting stones.
How about relating to Robertson as a human being, one that I might add has devoted far more to charity and helping people that I suspect the actual Christian haters and stone throwers on this thread. He may condemn homosexuality but would do everything for someone that wanted out of that lifestyle. And what I see on this thread is simply an opportunity to express a vile hatred of Christianity, NOT just a selective outrage over Pat Robertson or his character. Want to hate Christians? Then join the Left and the Islamofacists, and it looks like a third group is available the neo-Nazis, they all have one thing in common they HATE Jews and Christians, disguise it all they will as some selective disgust for this or that leader, or Zionism, but pressed, who exactly would be acceptable? My suspicion is a mute Christian would be the only acceptable Christian, or maybe a dead one. Think of the rejoicing on the Left when Falwell died.
Robertson is playing this very smart. Dobson, who has MUCH more pull on the right, has threatened a split or third party candidate. Robertson is waning in influence, but this move by him is to support those religious social values conservative voters (there are lots of them and the GOP needs them to win) who are leaning toward Rudy. Robertson has made a very rational calculation, from his perspective, that this will help those on the religious right to resist Dobson's "all or none" position.
Look, you do not have to agree with Robertson all the time, but you DO have to realize that the GOP cannot win without the BIG tent approach. Social values conservatives are a big backbone to the GOP. There is NOWHERE else for them to go, except to stay home and not vote. As religious people are increasingly voting Republican, not Democrat, you need to get them to the polls and to vote on the RIGHT side of the ledger.
We all make compromises. Robertson has said here that his social
conservative values are not endangered by Rudy and that national
security and appointment of judges (at least not letting Hillary appoint
them) is more important than getting your way ALL the time. This is a very pragmatic, very smart wedge into the potential religious right break from the GOP.
how the heck does an originalist, strict constructionist judge know exactly what the founders intended? Was he or she there at the time the ink was drying on the constitution?
You think reading the organic law of the land is difficult? And more prone to error than ignoring it? Hmmm
Keep your finger out of the trigger guard until ready to fire.
Alway know your backstop.
Treat every gun as if it were loaded.
Keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction when not in use.
(At least keep your finger out of the trigger guard, Ms. Bruce...)
She goes to class before she gets on the range with me.
If that's true, and it's a 2 way street (not white power groups attaching themselves to the Minutemen) then I'd agree.
But, in the dealings I've had with them I haven't seen anything like that.
On the other side, the only thing that is going to stop this is the spineless DC crowd, and both sides seem to be marching blindly into who-knows-what for reasons that are beyond me.
Unfortunately I don't think people like Duncan Hunter stand a chance. Rudy is a tough little bastard, I just wish that immigration was an area he'd get his dander up on.
Come on, everybody from Osama bin Laden to Noam Chomsky knows the Mossad & the CIA carried out the bombing of the Jewish center in Argentina as a pretext to kill innocent Muslims worldwide & plunder their hard-earned wealth.
Good G*d, I can't take any more. I used to love Rudy... now this! First, I read about Rudy's alleged (gay) child molesting Catholic buddy, and now the superfreak poster boy of the far right is tagging on his coat tails. I wouldn't cross the street to piss on Pat Robertson. Laugh at him - sure - but I find the man utterly revolting. Every time I see or hear him I taste bile in my mouth.
If Rudy dipped himself in sh*t I don't think I could find him less appealing at the moment.
well...you are given a choice, right,...maybe you will enjoy voting for hillary...
I held my nose and voted for a Repub in our Governor's race (KY) yesterday that I felt wasn't the best. ( Many Repubs stayed home) He lost and the state is back in the Dems hands. Although I feel Rudy is not the best we could do, I will vote for him if he is the nominee. I just hope the same result doesn't repeat itself.
Top
1SG, you had better get that state back into Repub hands before I retire for the second time and move there!
Albany, KY here I come in 10 years.
Oh and: Ron Paul!
The welfare crowd was out in force yesterday. But, Fletcher did not run a very good campaign.
If Rudy becomes president (please G-d), we'll have at least four more years of GDS on lefty-talk radio, Olbermann, Mathews, etc. But we ought to be used to it by now. Honestly, we'd miss it. Donchathink?
For that reason alone it would be worth it to vote for Rudy. ;-)
But if Robertson had a following willing to kill infidels and install a worldwide theocracy, he would cross the line into evil.
No he wouldn't.
Pat Robertson would like you to find Jesus, but he has no desire to kill anyone...And neither do his followers, of which he has many...perhaps a million or more.
If you look back at the Flanders White Power posts, you'll see the it looks like the Minutemen are connected with some White Power groups. They look like big boy scouts, but if they are into the White Power stuff, they're creeps in my book. What a let down.
"looks like"
"they look like"
"If they are into the White Power"
A lot of weasel words there. If you can't even commit to such an outrageous allegation why even bother making the comment?
Pat Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden.
GMAFB.
It's the nature of the two religions that makes the difference. Following Jesus closely requires self-denial. Following Mohammed closely, you get to justify almost any action if you can in some fashion use it to advance Islam.
In the intrest of :
Political correctness
Cultural diversity
and inclusivness
I, here by state my lack of fondness for Politicians
and TV Evangelists no matter of race color or religon!
Also, I think [Rudy] would clean Hillary's clock in the general election. After her last debacle of a performance on the Dem debate, the mask is slipping off. She has no idea what she is talking about if it isnt prescripted...so Tim Russert asks a legit question, and "wahaaahaaa you guys are all ganging up on me because I am a woman"...
..
The first thing I thought when I read about Hillary's Bad Night was, Only if Rudy could have been there! She waffles like that in a debate against Rudy and she is toast, so crisp that most independents and even some Democrats will choke over the char and smoke.
Rudy will crumble her quick as you can give a Bronx cheer and just look amused when she screeches, "I am a woman." If he should deign to reply to that cop out at all, he will say, "Hey, if you want to wear pants and play with the big boys, you have to keep your eye on the ball or take your tumbles just like everybody else when you swing and miss."
That's one of the main reasons I am supporting Rudy. I fear that any of the other Republicans likely to get the nomination would be intimidated by the shrew. Nor will President Rudy be intimidated by any crazy jihadi he has to deal with after he reaches the White House.
If that's true, and it's a 2 way street (not white power groups attaching themselves to the Minutemen) then I'd agree.
But, in the dealings I've had with them I haven't seen anything like that.
On the other side, the only thing that is going to stop this is the spineless DC crowd, and both sides seem to be marching blindly into who-knows-what for reasons that are beyond me.
Unfortunately I don't think people like Duncan Hunter stand a chance. Rudy is a tough little bastard, I just wish that immigration was an area he'd get his dander up on.
Sounds like maybe a (dare I say it) ploy to make the Minutemen out to be the next racist group( not that they aren't already called that!)
Pat Robertson. Politics makes strange bedfellows, for sure.
His endorsement should carry no weight. His opinions should carry no weight. But we cannot afford to be so pure that we only accept support from those whose thinking is aligned 100% with our own, and is therefore correct across the board.
Funkyfantom, I would have to know a lot more about this story before I believe it. Which hasidic neighborhood in Brooklyn, for example? Because there are a number of hasidic/haredi groups who, sad to say, have a ghetto mentality and like many inner city blacks or hispanics, will not cooperate with police and will lie through their teeth to protect the reputation of one of "their own" and slander the police without blinking an eye. We are having a serious problem with that here in Israel, where the Ultra-Orthodox think they are above the law and behave in a mob fashion whenever the police are called to the neighborhood. They lie to police, make up stories about what really happened, and harbor and protect the guilty.
I'm skeptical about this story, that's all. I have a very hard time believing that even one policeman, much less several, would open fire on an unarmed man in front of numerous witnesses. Something about it just doesn't ring true.
I held my nose and voted for a Repub in our Governor's race (KY) yesterday that I felt wasn't the best. ( Many Repubs stayed home) He lost and the state is back in the Dems hands. Although I feel Rudy is not the best we could do, I will vote for him if he is the nominee. I just hope the same result doesn't repeat itself.
Top
1SG, you had better get that state back into Repub hands before I retire for the second time and move there!
Albany, KY here I come in 10 years.
Oh and: Ron Paul!
The welfare crowd was out in force yesterday. But, Fletcher did not run a very good campaign.
Agree, and unfortunately I don't see the state repubs getting back in the governors office any time soon. A shame and a waisted opportunity. Goes back to, can't have an appearance of corruption, when replacing corruption.
Top
Let's see if he gets an endorsement from the Minutement!/wishing...
How can you ever think/wish that into exsistance? If he gets an endorsement from the Minutemen, I'm just going to give up. On everything. Seriously.
Oh, that's an easy one. 77% of the population wants something/anything done about immigration? Not getting some blanket amnesty or DREAM act or licenses or something else for illegals shoved down our throats? And Rudy likes his sanctuary cities? And the minutemen are only observers and trying to protect people's property? Maybe you don't live in a city or town that is overrun with "undocumented workers", haven't had somebody run into you and just split, or know anybody in a border area who's had their property vandalized, used as a bathroom or kitchen as they were passing through.
Sorry, but this to me and an awful lot of people I know is priority #1 right now, stop the flow and enforce current laws is all we ask.
Butt simple.
If you look back at the Flanders White Power posts, you'll see the it looks like the Minutemen are connected with some White Power groups. They look like big boy scouts, but if they are into the White Power stuff, they're creeps in my book. What a let down.
First I've heard of it. Do you mean " The Minutemen" the organization, or " the minutemen" the members?
I'll look for it - I think it was one of the leaders being interviewed by David Duke on some radio show.
at Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden.
Robertson is nutty, bin Laden is Evil.
There is no comparison.
True. But if Robertson had a following willing to kill infidels and install a worldwide theocracy, he would cross the line into evil. He is dangerously close to that line now. What keeps him from crossing it is his lack of a following.
do you have any proof of this other than the black helicopters flying over your house?
re: #86 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
"I'd even consider voting for Satan over Hilliary"
Well only after seeing them both on stage together and I was sure it wasn't Hilliary incognito!
LOL. It's hard to tell the difference isn't it?
No. Satan likes men. Hillary likes women.
I thought Satan was Bi.
Actually, Satan likes power, to rule over people solely for his own self-aggrandizement. That is why you can't distinguish him from Hillary.
I'll be impressed when it's the GOA, not the liberal NRA.
Er, also appearing on "The Political Cesspool" (and disappointingly so in my opinion) GOA's Larry Pratt.
(I didn't agree with how he was treated by the left when he was co-chairman of Buchanan's campaign in 1996, but as with Buchanan, I'm no longer giving him the benefit of the doubt.)
Lots of people looking a gift horse in the mouth. Robertson too freaky for you? No one is ever elected President without getting votes from freaky people.
Personally, I'd say blaming the 9/11 attacks on gays is pretty "demonic".
That is the way it was said? For such a sophisticated thinker I wonder how you miss the very real and historical argument that the decline of a nation's morality is directly related to its power and stature overall? If you in your lifetime have not noted the decay of our own culture you just don't want to see. I watched this Halloween and contrasted it with those when I was a kid. No little kids were without adults. Most were in Vans driven to a section while the adults watched, then loaded up repeat cycle. When I was a kid there were no adults, just kids, free to go about the neighborhood. And my neighborhood then was blue collar, mine now is solid middle class.
That is just one instance of the moral decay. If we did not have an immoral populace voting for an obvious fraud and immoral man such as Clinton twice, is their a chance 9/11 would not have happened? We pick leaders and there are consequences no matter what we think.
Things are connected and morality is connected to events here for individuals and nations. A viewpoint or desire for that not to be so will not change the laws of God one bit, just like physical laws there are spiritual laws, or do you think what is happening in Europe now is divorced from their abandonment of Christianity? Their only out now seems to be subscribe to one hatred to defeat another. Maybe it is just me but that appears like God has at least withdrawn from the scene there. So maybe if you do kick God out He does not so much judge...but you do get to be entirely on your own.
Maybe your choice is to grow the hell up. Stop the pouting all of you. Your lifestyle is not the most sacred thing in the universe, the universe does not revolve around you. It is important for millions who do not live here...what happens in our politics, and perhaps it is important to the future of civilization, so let go of your dicks for five minutes and pretend there is something greater than you or you little viewpoint. Now I am out of here, obviously it is a sin to accept neo-Nazis, but Christian bashing (no wait it is just Robertson, wink, wink) is acceptable. Hatred is HATRED no matter the object, no matter the hater.
I wonder how you miss the very real and historical argument that the decline of a nation's morality is directly related to its power and stature overall?
at Robertson and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same coin. Sure, Pat Robertson doesn't have a following that is willing to kill non-believers but he shares the same views as Bin Laden.
Robertson is nutty, bin Laden is Evil.
There is no comparison.
True. But if Robertson had a following willing to kill infidels and install a worldwide theocracy, he would cross the line into evil. He is dangerously close to that line now. What keeps him from crossing it is his lack of a following.
do you have any proof of this other than the black helicopters flying over your house?
Helicopters of the mind no doubt.
Christians and Jews (most) believe G-d has given us free will. The freedom and responsibility to chose between good and evil. Most of us do not believe in forcing people to make the choice. Forcing someone to chose removes not only their freedom but also their responsibility.
The comparison of Robertson and Bin Laden is absurd.
I would say Pat Robertson, by investing in Liberian diamond mines with the President-Tug-in-Chief Charles Taylor, is evil. The fact that his Christian flock don't condemn him for it is testiment to his abilities as a con-man.
Pat Robertson's tie to Charles Taylor is based on a financial connection. In 1999 Robertson's Freedom Gold company signed a deal to mine an area in southeastern Liberia. The Liberian government, i.e. Taylor, has a 10 percent interest in Freedom Gold. "I pray that this investment may become a wonderful blessing to the people of Liberia," Robertson said in a press release. More likely the government's 10 percent share will go to maintain Taylor's of the Sierra Leone diamond trade–and its big customer, al Qaeda. Colbert King of the Washington Post has written two columns criticizing Robertson for associating with the likes of Taylor. In reply, a Freedom Gold vice president faxed King, "Freedom Gold Limited was formed in response to Liberia's need to spur economic activity after their long and devastating civil war. Dr. Robertson remains a friend of Liberia and is working to alleviate the suffering of the Liberian people. Dr. Robertson's first and foremost goal is to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to all nations."
"Dr. Robertson's" first and foremost goal is to line his pockets.
Let me know when the NRA endorses him, them I'll be impressed.
I'll be impressed when it's the GOA, not the liberal NRA.
Don't diss the NRA in front of me. If not for the NRA the GOA would be Those Who Wish They Still Had a Firearm. A fact you had better appreciate and respect.
And it really slows Romney's momentum among anti-abortion crowd who managed to convince themselves, that as soon as somebody declares, like Romney, that he is against abortions, he becomes pure, no matter how obvious it is that it is a pandering.
Rudy did more for pro-life movement than anybody else in the race, if you are pro-life, not only anti-abortion. He proved that his policy makes abortions more rare. He also saved a lot of lives of already born New-Yorkers with his anti-crime success.
And I do not like Roberson too, but if it brings some votes to Rudy, I am grateful.
Surprised? Why? Remember, it's the MSM that's pushing what THEY think Christians will react to Giuliani - more disinformation than genuine analysis.
I can't speak for the man who wrote this last year, as to which candidate he will vote for - I don't know, but I love his solid outlook on life and maybe one or two more people will begin to have an understanding of Hristians that go beyond the MSM stereotypes.
I’m home doing correspondence and some coffee, minding my own business, very passive as usual, not wanting any trouble, but I’m a Christian realist—I’m not overly optimistic for the sake of optimism and not a pessimist for the sake of pessimism. My optimistic side says, “All is well.” My wife will be home soon with her sign language stories and will drink some tea and discuss what ministry was accomplished.
I will tell her of a flight coming up to the village of Wainwright, near Barrow on the North Slope. The missionary there needs a coal stove, a snow blower, and some groceries. He is collecting coal that has washed upon the beach, because stove oil is expected to go as high as $12 gallon in some villages. He will wish for coal in his stocking this Christmas! The weather where he lives is so nasty that his flight is one of my most dangerous. Plus, it’s dark up there now 24 hours a day for about three months, but we’ll make the flight. My new satellite phone and GPS will go with me. I must be an absolute realist to fly up here and survive.
My pessimistic side says this is the real world, this is where I live and minister, and my brand of theology says “the strong man of the home principle dictates that I have protection for my family and friends, the “am I my brother’s keeper “ principle. I think every household should be armed and all family members know how to protect, when to protect, and to what degree.
- a missionary in Alaska.
Regarding the MSM's obsession with the subject - because they think it'll be just the thing to sink Giuliani's boat - it doesn't take much to figure out whether Giuliani will promote abortion or not. PROMOTE is the operative word. He's not a PROMOTER - but the Democrats ARE - they have abortion as a rigid, hammered in plank of the Democrat Party Platform. Who's gonna be easier to work with on that one issue? Giuliani or any pick of the Democrats? They've pretty much chased out any dissenters.
So, the big issue on everyone's minds remains SECURITY. Now, in ten years, in twenty years - remember the demographics Mark Steyn has been warning about? The Muslim baby boom will hit voting age in Europe - in less than two decades, and that youth is radicalized, grown up on sucking off welfare, defiance of civil authority, and ethnic intolerance. What a thought - vote in increased welfare benefits to be paid by the working European public = instant serfdom. Overnight dhimmitude of ONE section of the population - those who actually produce. The "End of History" will be nothing more than a slide back into feudal society.
So, SECURITY trumps. Giuliani, to his eternal credit, refused that Saudi check. Shall we rewind to Democrat McKinney's whine, "I'll take it!"
As for the follow-up to the missionary's pensive mood, a pit bull crashed thru his back door a minute later and tried to eat his dog... after reading that excerpt, does anyone have any doubt as to who won the encounter?
I don't like Pat Robertson. This isn't "Christian-bashing," it's Pat Robertson-bashing.
Did I mention I don't like Pat Robertson?
I don't like Pat Robertson either because I think he's a phony. But that cuts both ways because you're no friend of Christians either Charles. There's an allowed double standard on this board from Catholic bashing to Protestant mocking that at the very least you allow. But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
Is that because it might interfere with {umm, umm} personal opportunity?
The only repubs to win in state races was Grayson for Sec of State and Farmer for Ag. Going to be a long 4 years! Crit Luellen drives me nuts! Who would name their child Crit and just what does it mean or is it a nicname for something else.
Top
I don't like Pat Robertson. This isn't "Christian-bashing," it's Pat Robertson-bashing.
Did I mention I don't like Pat Robertson?
Well, eventually we'd need a lizard effort for the U.S. like the Flanders one. But before or after the election would be the question. If we did it before, we would for sure run off people on the left who are wavering and might actually vote for someone like Guilliani. The good news is that it is Guilliani who would be the candidate/president and not these other groups. And he has an excellent track record in the most important areas, and a pliable one in other areas.
I don't like Pat Robertson. This isn't "Christian-bashing," it's Pat Robertson-bashing.
Did I mention I don't like Pat Robertson?
I don't like Pat Robertson either because I think he's a phony. But that cuts both ways because you're no friend of Christians either Charles. There's an allowed double standard on this board from Catholic bashing to Protestant mocking that at the very least you allow. But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
Is that because it might interfere with {umm, umm} personal opportunity?
If you don't like the policy at LGF, you're welcome to post elsewhere. I've deleted many anti-Christian comments, and banned several people for over the top statements. You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
And your smarmy comment about "personal opportunity" is highly offensive, by the way, as I suspect you realize.
There's an allowed double standard on this board from Catholic bashing to Protestant mocking that at the very least you allow. But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
There's a lot of atheist bashing too. I've criticized Jews here before; Rabbi Kahane, Olmert etc... It's free speech that allows us to criticize each other.
I get the sense he meant you wouldn't want to upset your Jewish friends so as to not upset any opportunity those relationships might offer. Still the comment was over the top.
I get the sense he was just trying to piss Mr. Johnson off, and I think he succeeded.
Robertson has thrown his hat into the political arena, and so he's fair game. It should be obvious that bashing him is no different from bashing Hillary or anyone else, and since he does not make sharp distinctions between his religious and political views, bashing him will inevitably involve bashing some particular religious views shared by Robertson and some other Christians.
As a Christian, I say to fellow Christians here, grow up a bit. Bashing Pat is not bashing Christianity.
If that's true, and it's a 2 way street (not white power groups attaching themselves to the Minutemen) then I'd agree.
But, in the dealings I've had with them I haven't seen anything like that.
On the other side, the only thing that is going to stop this is the spineless DC crowd, and both sides seem to be marching blindly into who-knows-what for reasons that are beyond me.
Unfortunately I don't think people like Duncan Hunter stand a chance. Rudy is a tough little bastard, I just wish that immigration was an area he'd get his dander up on.
Sounds like maybe a (dare I say it) ploy to make the Minutemen out to be the next racist group( not that they aren't already called that!)
There's an allowed double standard on this board from Catholic bashing to Protestant mocking that at the very least you allow. But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
NodroG discovered that in his final (Gospel/Torah) comment.
There may be a great schism with the evangelicals - James Dobson on one hand saying he'll not vote in the election if the republican candidate isn't pro-life, and Robertson saying he'll vote for Giuliani if he's the nominee.
It's unfortunate that an entire block of Christians will opt out, thereby allowing Herself to be elected (she who loves partial-birth abortion), all on the principle that it's the principle.
The real principle is allowing someone into office who will be appointing judges and signing bills into law that could make abortions easier. I'll be the first to ask them when that happens if they feel at all responsible for any of the babies aborted under Hillary and her crowd.
Making abortion an issue in this election will guarantee a democratic win.
re: #188 SunlightIf that's true, and it's a 2 way street (not white power groups attaching themselves to the Minutemen) then I'd agree.
But, in the dealings I've had with them I haven't seen anything like that.
On the other side, the only thing that is going to stop this is the spineless DC crowd, and both sides seem to be marching blindly into who-knows-what for reasons that are beyond me.
Unfortunately I don't think people like Duncan Hunter stand a chance. Rudy is a tough little bastard, I just wish that immigration was an area he'd get his dander up on.
Sounds like maybe a (dare I say it) ploy to make the Minutemen out to be the next racist group( not that they aren't already called that!)
Most likely, I'd love to see or hear the source!
I don't know. I found the thread:
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
Comments 271, 287, 326, 349, 371, 423, 457 (follow the link at 457 and the link at the next stop - that's the meat), 471, 513, 533.
As I said, I've been thinking of them a Boy Scouts, but I sure don't want them to line up with any any White Power people. We just don't need that. We just need to elects reps, who make laws (and if we don't like the laws, we throw out the reps in the next election), and then enforce the laws. Does not need to have anything to do with race, religion, culture... just behavior. And if international people don't like to live the way our laws outline, then they should pick another place that fits their preferences better.
BREAKING NEWS: Johnson and Robertson agree--It's Rudy! LOL
FWIW...I like all three.
Oh, btw, speaking of payroll and stuff...when the 2008 Mossad Stripper calenders were being handed out, I got an '07 Helen Thomas glamor-shot one. How long does the hatchling hazing last? And could I at least get the '08 Thomas calender...you know, for function.
/
Robertson has thrown his hat into the political arena, and so he's fair game. It should be obvious that bashing him is no different from bashing Hillary or anyone else, and since he does not make sharp distinctions between his religious and political views, bashing him will inevitably involve bashing some particular religious views shared by Robertson and some other Christians.
As a Christian, I say to fellow Christians here, grow up a bit. Bashing Pat is not bashing Christianity.
* * *
Some of you will remember John McCain in 2000 bashed Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance", before he kissed and made up with Jerry Falwell (of the "Moral Majority,"who died last year). McCain would probably have asked for Jerry Falwell's endorsement had the preacher lived.
Talk about shameless: John McCain yesterday accepted Senator Sam Brownback's endorsement and made him a "national co-chair" of his campaign, though McCain in fact voted for Senator/VP Al Gore in 2000, considered switching parties in 2000 and 2001, then in 2004 considered his friend Senator John Kerry's offer of the vice presidential spot on the democrat ticket! Major Flip Flopper & Non-straightalker.
First you all bash the founding fathers through Ron Paul. Now you bass the message of Jesus Christ through Pat Robertson. Is there a LGF blog for Christians?
Learning to take people one at a time is an important lesson.
I don't care for Robertson either. Doesn't mean I dislike Christians. On the contrary.
Remember, It is Andrew Sullivan who hates all or most Christians,and he does a non-stop job of lumping together everyone he hates. & Now, according to Andrew, Rudy and Robertson are indistingushable twins.
Pat Robertson states that he is first and foremost a broadcaster by profession. His media market of choice is the Christian market. He has been broadcasting on-the-ground reports from Israel and the Middle East for years and years - and far better reporting than the MSM gives out. His chat shows and hosts are a lot more civil and warm than what passes for civility in the MSM. So, his broadcasting career has been quite successful. (He's lightyears more professional than the Liberal Left media upstarts that flame and then burn out.)
It's easier to figure out where he's coming from if that background isn't forgotten.
And no, I don't have a TV so I haven't seen his face in years and have no idea what that network is doing now, so I'm not plugging it.
Looks like Robertson is throwing his weight to SECURITY. If all his public pronouncements are a guide, then Robertson would not want Israel abandoned, nor the American defense weakened in any way at home and abroad. Giuliani KNOWS the dangers, more than any one of the candidates.
Call me crazy but wasn't there a big fight among the Federalists and Anti-Federalists about having a bill of rights vs. an enumerated list of rights vs. having no BOR? Madison thought that an enumeration would act like a pigeon hole and that it was beyond human comprehension to list every single right and liberty. Therefore what you end up with is the general terms. If you look at the Constitution and BOR, some provisions are very specific on their face while others are much more general and subject to multiple definitions, be it then or now. Under the Originalist doctrine, one can just as easy pull something out of their ass about what was within and outside the original intent. Especially if it was something or some custom that didn't exist in 1780's. Scalia and Thomas are essentially calling balls and strikes, to tell us what they think the Framers didn't mean.
And can someone explain to me what these +/- things are at the upper corner of the posts? What do these things do?
I'm surprised that people are surprised by Pat's strategic endorsement, as a Christian (though of a different stripe than Robertson) I've been considering what compromises I myself would make--whether I'd go with principle and vote for Tancredo or Hunter (neither primary electable), or compromise a bit and go with Huckabee (nationally very electable) or McCain (not as electable). But Rudy, ugh. Just because Rudy finally came around to name the enemy ("Islamic terrorism," which he huffs and puffs about all the time now), does not at all mean he has a good approach to confronting it.
The question about Giuliani is since a good chunk of his professional life was in law - and the law enforcement community, how would he approach being Commander-in-Chief? This is the part that being a governor helps - having authority in a similar way over troops. This is a big unknown. Policing and soldiering are two different things.
The Democrats are fatally clueless when it comes to making the right call on knowing HOW and WHEN to use the United States military. From Carter's total lack of comprehension during the Iranian Hostage Crisis to the MArines' mandate is not to carry trays of canapes for White House functions. Clinton's punt of the 1st World Trade Center attack - an act of war crammed into a law enforcement box - help lay the foundations for the 2nd attack.
First you all bash the founding fathers through Ron Paul. Now you bass the message of Jesus Christ through Pat Robertson. Is there a LGF blog for Christians?
There are two schools of thought on the court. Judicial activism on both ends is equally as bad. The liberal justices have engaged in judicial activism just as much as the right. But unless Scalia and Thomas have some sort of crystal ball through which they can communicate with those who signed the Consititution and were present in the debates, how can they say with absolute certainty that this and that is outside of the original intent? Would they prefer to see an enumeration even though the Federalists fought successfully against that?
You can glean some details from the Federalist Papers and the Notes from the Convention, both of which I have read, but those documents combined with some of the more general provisions of the BOR and Constituition cannot always give the clear answer that Scalia and Thomas sometimes proport to have. I just think that there is a component to their school of thought that is rooted opposite to that of the Founders.
Is the penumbra theory overreaching? Yes, it can be and has been extended into some issues that the Court maybe should have ignored. But these issues didn't reach the light of day in 1783. The Constitution cannot ignore changes in society and technology because the country itself cannot ignore them. But the language of the constitution must be applied to these changes as they are litigated, and how do you define the word "liberty" without much other support? By anaology, putting a prisoner in the stocks in a public square would still be acceptable if we stuck to a 17th century frame of mind...not that we shouldn't be doing that:)
Also, Thomas and Scalia have also discarded the use of legislative history in interpreting statutes. How can proponents of the using the Federalist papers to interpret the legal document that is the Constitution be so against looking at the intent of those who write statutes if it is determined that there is an ambiguity?
"Robertson is like a Fred Phelps Lite who condemns people on television instead of at funerals." from TammyBruce's site.
Oh Please - comparing Robertson to Phelps is a big stretch - makes her opinion sound silly when she makes those far stretches. Robertson has never done anything nearly has horrible as Phelps does on a regular basis.
Goodbye_natalie, I hadn't noticed any Christian bashing on LGF but maybe I am not as sensitive to it since I'm not Christian. I do know that I myself frequently say not very nice things about my fellow Jews when they are moonbats or extremists, and Charles has never threatened to ban me for it . . . though I think one time I said something that kind of pushed the limit and I could feel Charles' stern glare through my computer screen.
I'm not sure what your last comment was supposed to mean but that's between you and Charles.
This thread has taken a weird turn with many posters acting kind of edgy. Not sure what's in the air tonight. Just for the record, I kind of like Pat Robertson. He might have some weird ideas about sin and retribution, and he might even be a phoney, but he's a friend to Israel so, God bless him. Even the least of us will get credit for what good deeds we do.
I don't like Pat Robertson. This isn't "Christian-bashing," it's Pat Robertson-bashing.
Did I mention I don't like Pat Robertson?
I don't like Pat Robertson either because I think he's a phony. But that cuts both ways because you're no friend of Christians either Charles. There's an allowed double standard on this board from Catholic bashing to Protestant mocking that at the very least you allow. But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
Is that because it might interfere with {umm, umm} personal opportunity?
/disgusted
I'm rather surprised at the last sentence.
I've seen Charles step in and stop over the top crazy Christian bashing.
Some people got out of control (not regular lizards) on the Falwell thread and Charles locked the thread and actually banned a few in there that were very deserving due to their hate speech rhetoric and trollish nature.
---
On topic:
Some of the posts in here equating Pat Robertson to Osama and Hillary to Satan are nuts. I don't think some people realize the word choice they use and the true definition of it otherwise they would see how completely ABSURD those comparisons are.
Others have said it better than I could, I don't expect this endorsement to do much. Most Christians have a mind of their own and are independent and don't need to be told who and how to vote.
As a born again Christian it is hard to listen to this type of criticism of Pat Robertson . I guess it is the insults from all corners that makes our skin raw. To find it here really rubs the salt in. How many people here have listened to Pat for more then an hour. HE IS NOT THE PERSON THE MSM PORTRAYS HIM.
Also, if people think that Christians are bashed here, they seriously have not been to other blogs to see it much much worse elsewhere.
A general comment I want to make about Christian bashing and the blogosphere:
I like HotAir and I respect both of the admins there for their hard work and good content in their postings. With that said, the posters there can be over the top on Christian bashing that I have to completely avoid those threads due to the absurdity and lack of fact checking.
At LGF, when you say stuff, you are expected to be fact checked or there can be 10 people that will hold your feet to the fire. I LIKE that we are allowed to do this. Other blogs do not do this and it easily goes into a cesspool. I am a Christian and I do not think we get a pass on being criticized.
"Robertson is like a Fred Phelps Lite who condemns people on television instead of at funerals." from TammyBruce's site.
Oh Please - comparing Robertson to Phelps is a big stretch - makes her opinion sound silly when she makes those far stretches. Robertson has never done anything nearly has horrible as Phelps does on a regular basis.
Anyone who has truly read what phelps is would see how absurd the statement is to equate him to a fred phelps lite.
But you'd be real quick with the banning stick if somebody came in here mocking the Jews.
So I finally see the real goodby_natalie.
Come to think about it, there has been more evidence lately, but as a Jew, I find this comment to be pure Jew hate, something I had not seen before. We usually are singled out like this, even if it is irrelevant.
And if there has ever been a defender of any true religion, be it Christian or Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, etc., it is Charles.
Nah...not up for fishing right now...maybe later. :)
Most bashing is pretty tame really...a fair amount is leg pulling.
I know for a fact, Jerry Falwell got far more, and of a more personal nature, than we could ever receive here. He had a pretty thick skin, IMO. I'd imagine the same is true of Robertson.
To act like there is NOT some pent up anti-Christian bias in some of the posters here is to be in denial. To many times when some Christian leader, whatever his imperfections, is highlighted here on LGF, this same vile crap comes out, far to much for everyone to pretend it is just personal dislike of a singular person. It is used as a mask to advance an anti-Christian bias. I wonder what Christian leader would not get bashed by some segment of posters? All well and good, but lets mount our chargers and go after those "Facists," in Europe. Careful when you start exacting a moral code, you will be measured also. I wonder if some X liberals here are going to discover what happens when you begin demanding enforcement of YOUR moral code.
I only noticed it in the past few weeks. It is just not possible to read every thread!
I do not cut anyone who makes comments like that much slack. As a retired RN who learned about sleep deprivation working all sorts of weird shifts, and double shifts, and as the mum of 4 now-adult kids? I do not recall becoming anti-anything, except anti-sleep deprivation. Seriously, if I had been a hater of any religion? Perhaps I would have let it become public if I had worked 16 plus hours in a critical unit, as the governor that keeps us from saying things out loud can be a bit over worked, but the hate had to be there in the first place. Sleep deprivation is not a known cause of hate.
And that totally unwarranted attack on Charles? Do you have an excuse for that, for goodby_natalie's tirade?
Nana, he's been like this for years! It's the first time he's gone after Charles, but it's not the first time he's launched a frankly vile, smarmy attack on someone. The things he says are always on exactly this same line; he indicates that there's some ulterior motive for whatever he's attacking you for. Having been on the receiving end a number of times, I'm probably more aware of it than you are.
Research his history.
As to his harboring hate...look, he's got some issues. I don't think it's "hate", exactly. I think that he's very angry, and not very good at dealing with it. When he's having trouble sleeping (at least that's my guess), it comes out and he starts attacking people.
And insomnia - when it extends past 3 days, anyway - can make you hallucinatory. It's not just sleep deprivation that does it.
I'm something of an authority on insomnia from the inside.
re: #338 NY Nana
I doubt that goodbye_natalie is at all like what you describe.
Let me just present to you what I see. The ashes of WWII, discovery of the extent of the Holocaust and the attendant finger pointing in every direction. Christian religions pointing the finger at one another. The surviving Jews unable and/or unwilling to absolve Christianity (including those born after the event) from responsibility for the Holocaust. A new generation of European youth unwilling to accept the guilt laid upon their families. Instead, turning to secular hedonism, a complete rejection of religion. Birthrates falling below replacement levels. Churches in decline and emptied. A Pope standing at a concentration camp asking, "Why, God why?" A massive influx of ideology based religious extremists filling the void. Bringing with them a 7th century view of how to deal with those that fail to subscribe to their beliefs. In responde to the islamists, the beginning of a resurgence of thought that created the last Holocaust.
Who is finally going to say, "Enough! Stop it!"
We all need to learn from history. Give a little, forgive a little, especially those that had nothing to do with the events of that time. But I don't see that happening, and certainly not here.
As the youth of Europe have turned and fled from the finger pointing and 'guilting' and left a void, so may more than a few contributors to lgf.
There is a hell of a lot more than a sliver of truth to what goodbye_natalie says in his first paragraph. I have noticed it and complained, Mama Winger has noticed it and complained, and now Goodbye_natalie has noticed it and complained. If you want to think that makes us haters, well, I can't agree.
I think g_n has been a pretty good guy in all the time that I have been here at LGF, so I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt for this one post that seems out of character. I don't know what his last comment meant but we all sometimes say things that don't make sense to others or that just aren't right no matter how you look at them. As for the Christian bashing vs. Jews getting extra protection -- I think I'll pay more attention from now on to see if I can understand why g_n has that perception. I think we are all more sensitive inside than people realize, and comments that may pass us by and be hardly noticed might cause someone else a lot of pain.
I do not want to get into a war on this issue...so help me, I honestly did miss this side of him until, I owuld say, the past few weeks, but today? He really outdid himself, and is on my scroll by list.
30 hours? Ouch. I am trying to recall, and I think I have just about equalled that, during an emergency at the hospital where I trained in Brooklyn eons ago...but when you are in your very early 20's, as I was (I was an RN at the time)? You are more able to do it. Now? Fahgetaboutit!
I have seen cases like Mel Gibson, et al...the real person comes out..and no, I do not for a second think that goodby-natalie was drunk or drinking at the time.
re: #354 NY Nana
Well, I understand. But this link that someone posted the other day, and still stands, is a prime example of what I'm talking about. If my generation, and religion*, is going to be lambasted here why should those that profess to being Christian not complain? I did not, nor Mama Winger, or goodbye_natalie have a damn thing to do with the Holocaust, yet we can be freely criticized and subjected to ridicule as if we all are jackbooted, knuckle dragging nazis.
At a certain point, as in the youth of Europe, we may all say, "F it" and let the chips fall where they may. Knowing full well that the crocodile is not going to come for us first.
* If I'm even religious - this being the Interwebs and all, who knows?
/ Love ya too, but I hate to see some of the stuff go on that is going to chase some good people away.
There's a certain level of vitriol that I just won't put up with, and goodbye_natalie and jehu are welcome to find somewhere more conducive to their views.
It's not about my conscience and I think that is a bit on the insulting side. It is what I see in front of me what is said. For heated discussions, I can cut slack, but not this type of stuff in his post. His last sentence was more than uncalled for.
Pat Robertson also has a history of some shady dealings with Liberian gangster & genocider Charles Taylor over diamond mines. And guess who else is involved with Liberian diamond smuggling? Al Qaeda.
IMHO, Pat Robertson is a nasty evil son of a bitch and a con man.
Hi Kenneth!
I had not heard of this stuff until you linked it a few months back. It gives me the feeling it's a hit piece and that there is more to the story. Just a gut feeling.
I don't watch Pat nor any other tv evangelist. I have seen him a few times and last about 15 mins. TV evangelists just aren't my cup of tea.
I just can't agree to your last statement though...seems a bit on the far out side...
Uhh...WTH? Who in their right mind expects a man to put up with being insulted in his own house? Charles has been called enough names elsewhere to not have to put up with it here. For a long time poster to not realize that Charles doesn't have to take this- where have you been? What blog have you been reading? What about him made you think he wasn't a fighter? Did you really expect him to just take it lying down? Makes me wonder who it is you thought you were dealing with. That these two newly banned posters thought so little of him that they thought they could spew that vitriol- after years of being on this blog- I can't say I'm sorry to see that mentality kicked to the curb.
If you don't like it here- you don't have to stay.
And as far as cutting anyone slack? It's real convenient to cut slack when it suits our purposes. Would we cut a kosling some slack? A crook? No- but when it's a "friend"- sure! That's hypocritical. If it had been a genuine troll, we'd have expected Charles to ban it. So why should this be different? It should be worse, because these were folks who should have known better.
I just left a post about this at another person's blog.
I'm wary of saying with absolute certainty that "such and such a bad event happened because it was God's judgement."
HOWEVER.
As someone who takes the Bible literally, I can tell you that God has in the past passed judgment on individuals as well as nations for refusing to repent.
Sometimes disease, captivity, natural disasters, etc. were the form of punishment God doled out.
You recall God killing all first-born Egyptian sons, right? And how God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for living in habitual, on-going sin? In the Old Testament, God insturcted the Jews to kill the pagan peoples living around Isreal. (More examples could be cited.)
God also states in the Bible He will pass judgement on nations for how they treat Israel.
There is some (biblical) support for some of the Robertson's views / statements.
Yes, and you and certain others do it, if it is needed, and sincerely. But I will be darned if I remember you and almost all the others needing or having to apologize.
The past few weeks? It seems that a certain gang who we always enjoyed reading, posting to, etc. had decided, ironically, around Halloween, to take off the masks.
The neo-nazi Belgian mess brought them out of the woodwork..or in some cases, the primordial slime...
Hell, they were not wearing costumes then..they were themselves..a mask and costume would have been preferable.
I'm disappointed that Robertson endorsed Guiliani. This only marginalizes him further in the eyes of reasonable people everywhere. How can those who call themselves Christians support those whose values are diametrically opposed to Christian values.
For the record, I'm no christian but I think most are pretty likeable people. To equate valid criticism of Robertson - an asshole who projects his own apparently murderous frustrations onto God - with "christian-bashing" is an insult to normal christians.
Your comment was disgusting and hateful, way over the line.
Oh I really feel SOOO BAAAD for saying some unpleasant words about a creep who described the worst terrorist atrocity in America's history as though it were some kind of righteous and godly act. Yeah, you really got my guilt trip going there./sarc
This only marginalizes him further in the eyes of reasonable people everywhere.
With all due respect, Reasonable people will have to make those calls despite the subtle blackmail pressure of being labelled as "unreasonable."
How can those who call themselves Christians support those whose values are diametrically opposed to Christian values.
That can happen when people review the evidence and then decide that in fact there are more shared values than the MSM wants the public to know about.
Giuliani manages to cheerfully mingle with people of all classes, and ethnicities, and figures out how to get such same disparate people to set goals and get tasks done. He has a strong sense of right and wrong and the need to uphold the laws of civilized society - so much that he devoted his professional life to such work.
Can't say what Giuliani considers himself to be religiously, but all these are sturdy pillars of no-nonsense Christian living. Jesus got grief from the "religiosity" types all the time for hanging out with the "wrong" kind of folks, but Jesus rebuked and chided people for being so stuffy - he was hanging out with people who needed him the most.
And no, I haven't decided yet who to vote for, but all this talk about what Christians OUGHT to do and HOW they should think is quite curious.
Hate is your word pal, not mine. I find people of Robertsons ilk more pitiable than anything else. Hate is surely what filled the mind of Mr Robertson when he congratulated god for 9/11. But hey - I'm just trying to deflect from the REAL crime here - my dastardly and evil use of the words turd, maggot, and aids.
Oh I really feel SOOO BAAAD for saying some unpleasant words about a creep who described the worst terrorist atrocity in America's history as though it were some kind of righteous and godly act. Yeah, you really got my guilt trip going there./sarc
Well, it is so nice that you elevated the discourse to a higher level and showed him, hmm? You are the perfect example of what is wrong here. But I guess it's not really vitriol if it is directed at a Christian.
Oh I really feel SOOO BAAAD for saying some unpleasant words about a creep who described the worst terrorist atrocity in America's history as though it were some kind of righteous and godly act. Yeah, you really got my guilt trip going there./sarc
Well, it is so nice that you elevated the discourse to a higher level and showed him, hmm? You are the perfect example of what is wrong here. But I guess it's not really vitriol if it is directed at a Christian.
There's no vitriol from me. I made a joke. I'm sensing an increasing level of seething from you though. Why would you take such offence at someone making a joke about Pat Robertson? Don't people who applaud terrorist acts as though they were acts of God deserve criticism - even riduicule? Isn't that what we do here with Islamists who profess such attitudes? I treat people who speak in this way alike, regardless of what religion they espouse. You are the one who is arguing for a double standard - one that makes a special case for christians who do this.
Hate is surely what filled the mind of Mr Robertson
You don't know that, so it's an opinion of yours.
when he congratulated god for 9/11
.
Got some quotes for that claim? Not a soul who read or heard his comments came anywhere near that interpretation of yours, "congratulated god"
But hey - I'm just trying to deflect from the REAL crime here - my dastardly and evil use of the words turd, maggot, and aids.
Well, you admit it's vile to smear someone with those terms, in the manner in which you strung them together. What's telling about your personality is you're proud of it.
Wow. What a weird thread, and I've only read down from 273.
I like Rudy. I don't like Pat Robertson. This endorsement is both strange and amusing, but mainly just weird. Maybe it's driven some of the posters a little off kllter.
Dianna, if you're still here- Christian bussing is always in order.
I can understand and appreciate that sentiment. However- I believe Charles to be a gracious and patient host who does not need to tolerate contemptuousness in his own house if he doesn't want. I accept his decision. If I want to read garbage like that- I can pick a stalker blog to read.
I have said this a number of times, and will say it yet again.
Post-9/11, this is a very different world. We can no longer afford the luxury of voting for candidate So and So because he fits our personal agenda, nor can we afford to not vote for candidate So and So because he does not share our beliefs, or some of our beliefs. I do not think that any one candidate can be or is the perfect choice.
The only viable candidate is the one who is strong on security, and not just regurgitating what his speech writers have written, and can answer a question honestly, even if he realizes it is not what some may want to hear, and who will spit in the eye of any arab who tries to buy him. He must have prior experience in handling a cataclysm like 9/11, so that is why I am for Rudy. He is not perfect, far from it, but he has the internal strength to face the enemy, and take action immediately; and yes, before something happens, if he has advisers like John Bolton as Sec. of State, and the best man as Sec. of Defense, and as Chief of Staff. I feel that Rudy will do all of this, as he learned a lesson on 9/11 that no one should ever have to learn.
Another Condi clone would be a disaster.
And sitting home throwing a tantrum, or holding one's breath till you turn blue is the very worst thing.
Our kids' and grandkids' future literally depend on who the next President will be.
The 'Me,Me,Me' generation is so yesterday.
If you want to see our country stand tall against the common enemy, the cult of islam, then swallow hard, hold your nose, and use your hand that is free to pull the lever for who your brain tells you is the best one..refuse to vote in 2008? There may not be a chance to do it in 2012.
Yes, it is that critical. If you do not think so, then you have a reading problem if the threads and posts have not convinced you.
There is not even a 1/2 of a Demonrat candidate who is fit to lead our country, not a one.
Hate is surely what filled the mind of Mr Robertson
You don't know that, so it's an opinion of yours.
when he congratulated god for 9/11
.
Got some quotes for that claim? Not a soul who read or heard his comments came anywhere near that interpretation of yours, "congratulated god"
But hey - I'm just trying to deflect from the REAL crime here - my dastardly and evil use of the words turd, maggot, and aids.
Well, you admit it's vile to smear someone with those terms, in the manner in which you strung them together. What's telling about your personality is you're proud of it.
Falwell and Robertson expressing the view that 9/11 was a deserved punishment from God. Read their lips.
In attacking me and defending him, it is clear you regard my joke about this arsehole as worse than that. What does that say about you, MR wanumba?
I don't have any problem with disparaging those who use religion to justify terror, no matter what angle they are coming from.
Somehow it is all too easy to imagine you not laughing.
Btw the new episode of south park is on in 22 minutes. I take it you won't be watching.
Let me try to find the humor in this again:
Pat Robertson would be a turd sandwich with maggots in it. And the maggots would have aids.
Pat Robertson would be a piece of excrement contained in a sandwich. Not laughing yet.
Furthermore, there would be maggots contained in the excrement. Still not laughing.
But the maggots, contained in the excrement which is Pat Robertson, would have AIDS! Nope, I'm still not finding anything funny.
As for your comment:
Somehow it is all too easy to imagine you not laughing.
Do you have a problem with people that aren't white?