LGF

Bhutto Assassinated

Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 6:49:43 am PST

Bad news from Pakistan. The Islamists kept trying until they finally succeeded in murdering Benazir Bhutto.

RAWALPINDI, Pakistan - Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was assassinated Thursday in a suicide attack that also killed at least 20 others at the end of a campaign rally, aides said.

The death of the 54-year-old charismatic former prime minister threw the campaign for the Jan. 8 election into chaos and created fears of mass protests and an eruption of violence across the volatile south Asian nation.

The attacker struck just minutes after Bhutto addressed a rally of thousands of supporters in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, 8 miles south of Islamabad. She was shot in the neck and chest by the attacker, who then blew himself up, said, Rehman Malik, Bhutto’s security adviser.

At least 20 others were killed in the attack.

Advertisement

544 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 JamesTKirk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:50:49am

Bastards. We said it all in the DT.

2 paint-right  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:51:13am

Most awful. May they get it through their thick heads that this cult to which they belong is evil.

3 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:51:18am

Well I'm not going to blame Hillary for this.

4 Teacake!  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:51:26am

some one on the news said that this is going on because alqueda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes. that makes sense.

5 Striker  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:52:31am

I just heard about this, ROPMA!

Things are going to get VERY interesting soon, wonder what President Bush is going to say/do about this?

Wasn't she "friendly" to us in regards to opening up Pakistan to hunting down OBL and other AQ heads?

6 paint-right  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:52:44am

Now the cult of revenge. And riotiing. And rage.

7 MrSilverDragon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:52:44am

May she rest in peace. I wish I knew how to fix their backwards misogynistic culture. Peacefully, of course.

8 Teacake!  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:52:53am

the corespondent also said the usa won't have to do much if things get bad because India will, lets hope!

9 Ben Hur  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:52:57am

Cheney.

The Black Hand.

Cicci! A porte!

10 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:53:18am

And I was commenting yesterday how the security forces were doing a good job. Maybe they weren't. Or maybe now they've done their best work?

11 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:53:39am

America's "allies" in the GWOT: Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

12 tommylotto  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:54:13am

secure the nukes ASAP

13 paint-right  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:54:21am

re: #5 Striker

I just heard about this, ROPMA!

Things are going to get VERY interesting soon, wonder what President Bush is going to say/do about this?

Wasn't she "friendly" to us in regards to opening up Pakistan to hunting down OBL and other AQ heads?

CNBC was implying that Bush put her up to this ill-advised attempt to return to Pak and run for office. So you see where this is headed and whose fault it really is?

14 JamesTKirk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:54:32am

re: #4 Teacake!

some one on the news said that this is going on because alqueda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes. that makes sense.

It's also old news. They want a Caliphate with Saudi money and Paki nukes.

15 aussiesimon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:54:42am

A very tragic occurence and deepest condolences to her family and supporters. This will upset the tulip cart even more.

16 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:54:48am

re: #4 Teacake!

some one on the news said that this is going on because alqueda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes. that makes sense.

India will turn it into a smoking wasteland before that could happen.

17 harrylook  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:55:10am

Boy, that deal with the islamic supremacists has worked out just great - for the terrorists. Maybe it's time to kill them all, Pervez. Just a suggestion.

18 JamesTKirk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:55:21am

re: #8 Teacake!

the corespondent also said the usa won't have to do much if things get bad because India will, lets hope!

That sounds too much like sitting on our butts waiting for Israel to take care of Iran for us.

19 freetoken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:55:27am

The AFP story reminds us:
[Link: www.afp.com...]

There have been more than 40 suicide attacks in Pakistan this year that have left at least

770 people dead.

She was also the first women to lead a Muslim country. Will she be also the last?

20 PoorMan  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:55:58am

She was probably the last best hope of having anyone other than a military-backed strongman in charge of nuclear-armed Pakistan.

Back in the 70's her dad was a piece of work.

21 resize  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:56:06am

If civil war does break out...I hope Musharrafs government has a way of turning "off" the nukes.

22 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:56:43am

Bhutto put herself in extreme danger from the moment she stepped back in Pakistan. Her enemies would not tolerate her presence, and the Islamists would seek to kill her because she had the audacity to think that a woman's place was anywhere but hidden behind the burkha and never to be seen doing anything more than serving her husband.

Both groups of people (and there were commonalities between the two - they aren't mutually exclusive) are going to try and take advantage of the situation.

Throw in the fact that Sharif's followers came under attack today as well, and you've got a recipe for disaster. Musharraf is ill-prepared to deal with this crisis, as his waffling ways have helped encourage the Islamists. Sure, one can point to his occasional crackdowns, but it's the appeasement that gives the Islamists hope that they can take down the government and replace it with an Islamist regime.

More here.

23 paint-right  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:56:58am

re: #12 tommylotto

secure the nukes ASAP

Yikes. You're right! Oh brother.

Somewhere, ( Ann Coulter? ) i read negative things about MRs Bhutto. Like she was a quasi commi socialist and that Musharraf for all his faults was actully holding things together.

24 Killian Bundy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:57:10am

Told you so.

/she should have stayed gone

25 Lively  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:57:24am

I see the headlines: "World Rocked"

Hello? Islamists do this every single day. I hope the "world" wakes up and sees that Islam is trying to murder innocents...female or male...Head of State or bus driver. People are targeted day in and day out.

26 Render  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:57:26am
27 freetoken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:57:40am

re: #21 resize

If civil war does break out...I hope Musharrafs government has a way of turning "off" the nukes.

Post 9/11 and before the US moved in Afghanistan, China offered to safeguard the Paki nukes, as a sort of neutral third party.

28 AbbaMD  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:07am

My heart is bleeding...

29 profitsbeard  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:15am

It's just little old Islam.

Where women are only worth half of a man, so you need to blow them in half to demonstrate it when they get uppity.

But no one in the MSM will condemn the paranoid warlord pedophile's teachings or example.

It must be something, anything BUT Islam.

Let the excusology machines start humming.

30 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:21am

When does "all hell" start to break loose in Pakistan? My money is on Monday. [grim wager]

31 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:25am

This exposes Pakistan in all its glory. A failed state, which back in 1954 was on a par with Taiwan. Look where we are 54 years on. Taiwan is a wealthy and progressive Westernised country, whilst Pakistan is a semiliterate Islamic craphole with open sewers, a 30% literacy rate, overrun with savages who'll do this sort of thing with no regrets - and much more worryingly - armed with nukes. And why? You've guessed: Islam! Those who can plan and do this sort of thing to Benazir Bhutto wouldn't baulk at eliminating 6 million Israelis, 7 million Londoners, 17 million New Yorkers, or Calcutta's 18 million residents if they had the chance. Lets be in no doubt as to what gets taught in the madrassahs. The pro-Jihad press in Pakistan wanted this to happen just as the pro-Nazi press in Germany wanted the Reichstag to go up in flames. But Bhutto's killers represent something far worse and much darker than Nazism or Communism. They represent the new wannabe order in Pakistan, then the world. The repercussions of this atrocity will reverberate right across the Muslim world. Islamic Intolerance is on the march, yet intellectually paralysed by 40 years of political correctness, we dare not call a spade a spade. We dare not expose Islam for what it is, lest we get accused of racism. We dare not tell the families of victims of Islamic atrocities about the commands to murder non-Muslims in the texts of the Koran, Sira and hadith, nor the rewards of 72 virgins promised for these murderous acts. Any attempts to tell the truth on far too many messageboards leads to these truthtelling posts being removed. Here in the West, we have far too many stupid leaders who still cling to the asinine belief that Islam is a religion of peace, contrary to the evidence of 14 centuries of ravenous bloodletting and suffering on an epic scale, when in full technicolor, it is a religion of murder, bloodlust, savagery, sadism, extreme cruelty, misogyny, infidel-hatred, viciously antisemitic, anti-progressive, destructive, wishes to destroy all pleasure, slags us off as immoral whilst at the same time elevating mass murderers to martyrdom.

32 sarah  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:29am

I am so sad to her this. Prayers to her family and supporters

33 Bill Amos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:58:53am

Keep in mind Butto campaigned on a platform of confronting terrorism. She wanted the terrorists out of Pakistan.

Lets hope that wish comes true

34 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:10am

re: #23 paint-right

Bhutto was a corruptocrat, and while the media loved to portray her as a reformer, she was very much a part of the corruption and graft that forms the base of the Pakistani government.

35 Carl in Jerusalem  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:12am

Was Bhutto Hindu or Muslim?

36 M. Bensson-Levi  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:13am

Re posted from the D/T

Morning All,

In light of today's events, here's a real head thumper for you. I can only hope that this is in error.

Terrorists' new mission: Protect President Bush
Most active West Bank militant group in security team for Middle East visit

According to Israeli security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Bush's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Bush's convoy and in securing the parameter during the meeting with Abbas.

Unbelievable Stupidity...Starting with the visit to Ramallah!

37 finallyhere  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:24am

Do not worry, as soon as Bush and Condi create another Arab terrorist state instead of Israel, it will be Peace in the Middle East. That is the primary goal, highest priority, main legacy, what else?

38 jaydee  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:41am

The sick cult of death and destruction won in the end.
Condolences to her family.
{R.I.P. Benazir Bhutto}

39 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:41am

re: #30 Golem Akbar
er, its Friday tomorrow. Thats when the blue touchpaper gets lit.

40 Leauki  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 6:59:49am

"this is going on because al qaeda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes"

If Al Qaeda take over Pakistan, India will invade.

And that invasion must happen quickly and at almost any cost. Otherwise India's big cities will be glass.

41 traumakitty  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:00:13am

I am so sick of these islamofascist slime! Enough is enough! Prayers for her family and the families of those murdered by the slimy bast**ds the world over.

42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:00:37am

re: #13 paint-right

re: #5 Striker


I just heard about this, ROPMA!

Things are going to get VERY interesting soon, wonder what President Bush is going to say/do about this?

Wasn't she "friendly" to us in regards to opening up Pakistan to hunting down OBL and other AQ heads?


CNBC was implying that Bush put her up to this ill-advised attempt to return to Pak and run for office. So you see where this is headed and whose fault it really is?

Well the MSM didn't wait long did they? Her body isn't even cold yet.

Bastards.

I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?

43 scaramouche  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:00:57am

The truth about Pakistan (paraphrasing Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men: "You can't handle democracy.

44 eon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:01:06am

re: #8 Teacake!

the corespondent also said the usa won't have to do much if things get bad because India will, lets hope!

Good morning, on a sad day, Lizards.

You can just about "bet the ranch" that the Indian Armed Forces are on full war alert. They have, after all, fought three wars with Pakistan in the last half-century, and two of them ended with "changes of management" in Pakistan. The prospect of a civil war in a country they have this sort of history with, that now has nuclear weapons in its arsenal, is guaranteed to get all leaves canceled as of five minutes ago.

What happens in Islamabad over the next 72 hours will, I strongly suspect, have ramifications for decades to come.

/Just a thought


cheers (sort of)

eon

45 FightingBack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:01:28am

Her veil didn't protect her.

46 bolivar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:01:28am

This is a very sad day for the whole world. RIP Ms Bhutto. You deserved better but, your sad excuse for a religion will not allow light to shine on their depravity nor anybody to make them pay for their terrible deeds.

Murdering an unarmed woman, what an excellent example of the cowardice and utter worthlessness these jihadis exhibit. Some say that suicide bombers are brave - bullshit - they are cowards who don't have the stones to really fight.

I am very saddened by this loss.

47 Ben Hur  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:01:44am

I guess this means that Pakistan just wasn't ready for a female Prime Minister.

48 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:02:07am

re: #39 SpiritOf1683

re: #30 Golem Akbar
er, its Friday tomorrow. Thats when the blue touchpaper gets lit.

You may well be right. [looking for my seatbelt for the bumpy ride]

49 Bubblehead II  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:02:08am

A brave Lady. but honestly, are any of us really surprised? We all knew that they would try and kill her and would eventually succeed. We talked about it in depth when she first returned and got a lot of people killed during that ill advised motorcade/parade. May she rest in peace and as Paint Right stated in #2, maybe now the people will get it through thier heads that the islamofacists have got to be utterly destroyed or the killing will just go on. But I honestly doubt that they will.

50 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:02:34am

re: #24 Killian Bundy

She was an intentional death magnet. You weren't alone in calling things in Pakistan. The Islamists simply wouldn't let her remain alive.

51 garycooper  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:02:49am

Makes you wonder how Pervez has survived this long, doesn't it?

52 jjmckay1216  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:02:56am

re: #36 M. Bensson-Levi

Re posted from the D/T

Morning All,

In light of today's events, here's a real head thumper for you. I can only hope that this is in error.

Terrorists' new mission: Protect President Bush
Most active West Bank militant group in security team for Middle East visit

According to Israeli security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Bush's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Bush's convoy and in securing the parameter during the meeting with Abbas.

Unbelievable Stupidity...Starting with the visit to Ramallah!

When do u think this visit will be called off?

53 resize  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:03:07am

re: #40 Leauki

"this is going on because al qaeda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes"

If Al Qaeda take over Pakistan, India will invade.

And that invasion must happen quickly and at almost any cost. Otherwise India's big cities will be glass.

I wonder who Iran will support?

54 scaramouche  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:03:41am

#31 Spiritof1683

Think of how successful Pakistan might have been if only the Jews had been allowed to run it.

55 freetoken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:07am

re: #47 Ben Hur

I guess this means that Pakistan just wasn't ready for a female Prime Minister.

... to return to her former position.

56 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:18am

re: #20 PoorMan

She was probably the last best hope of having anyone other than a military-backed strongman in charge of nuclear-armed Pakistan.

Back in the 70's her dad was a piece of work.

Wow, I had to go back and read about Ali Bhutto, and his hanging in 1979. I remember reading about it at the time, but it's been awhile.

57 Pawn of the Oppressor  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:25am

re: #34 lawhawk

re: #23 paint-right

Bhutto was a corruptocrat, and while the media loved to portray her as a reformer, she was very much a part of the corruption and graft that forms the base of the Pakistani government.

The open letter from her niece (?), published a couple of months ago, was an interesting read. It sounds like she was a Pakistani Bill Clinton (to put it kindly) even after discounting how much of Asian/ME politics is based on populism and image.

The only result of this is chaos, which is exactly what Orthodox Islamic Fascism thrives on. It wouldn't exactly hurt Musharaff either, but maybe that's what the actors want people to believe. I know the ISI is a state within a state there, but it's amazing how shitty things are over there.

And they have the bomb, too. Peachy.

58 Iron Fist[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:35am
59 EC Marm  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:39am

re: #42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?


Kos Kids mourn for one half second, then point finger:


Great! And yes, Republic lurkers, it's Bush's fault. Like everything else in the totally whacked Middle East is right now. When you upset an entire region, this is what you get.Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21

by funluvn1 on Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 05:13:50 AM PST

18 positive dings at last count...By the Geographically challenged kosers

60 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:40am

How long before somebody blames it on Karl Rove or those Jooos?

61 hl mencken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:04:59am

One of the few (aspiring) leaders in the islamic world who fully understood the pernicous nature of islamofascism, how harmful it is to their own people, let alone the west, and was brave enough to return & stand up against this cult of death, all the while aware that legions of her countrymen wanted her dead -- may she inspire others to rise up against this cancer and may she rest in peace. a very sad day.

62 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:05:04am

re: #34 lawhawk

re: #23 paint-right

Bhutto was a corruptocrat, and while the media loved to portray her as a reformer, she was very much a part of the corruption and graft that forms the base of the Pakistani government.

Yes, hey have quite a tradition of that.

63 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:05:19am

This is going to get ugly.

Roundup with assorted links and reaction.

64 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:05:21am

re: #35 Carl in Jerusalem

Was Bhutto Hindu or Muslim?

Were you really serious with that question?

Does a Hindu get elected to public office in an explicitly Muslim country?

65 Snowflake  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:05:27am

Call me a cynic, but she may be more valuable as a martyr of democracy than an actual leader of it. There is a long history of corruption associated with her, some is probably fabricated, but still, where there is smoke... Regardless, it's a pity she had to die. How many civilians went out with her? Perhaps this will drive home the barbarity of the extremists to the "normal" Pakistanis.

66 opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:05:27am

Possible Civil War in Pakistan?

Nuclear Weapons in the hands of Rage Guy and his friends?

Screw it. We don't care.

We're going to nominate the Republican candidate who genuflects to the only issues that count, who says the right things about abortion and gays.

67 paint-right  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:06:09am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

What you said. Spot on.

i was also thinking that assassinating a woman does not have the same ghastly effect that it has on us. We are appallled simply because she is a woman - no matter her political rightness or wrongness. - the remnants of chivalry and respect which our Western culture has ( and is so reviled for by progressives and regressives alike) . But for islamofascists, this is a triumphant moment. They are high fiving all over the world and even the "moderates' may not be feeling the revulsion that western sensibilities feel.

What is the origin of that word , again? "Assassin"?

68 Keli  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:06:24am

She was an incredibly brave woman.
R.I.P Benazir Bhutto.

69 Spiny Norman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:06:30am

re: #25 Lively

I see the headlines: "World Rocked"

Hello? Islamists do this every single day. I hope the "world" wakes up and sees that Islam is trying to murder innocents...female or male...Head of State or bus driver. People are targeted day in and day out.

The Media apologists will see to it that the Islamists are not blamed. No, the "world" is not going to wake up any time soon.

:^þ

70 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:06:57am

re: #54 scaramouche

#31 Spiritof1683

Think of how successful Pakistan might have been if only the Jews had been allowed to run it.


I would imagine that even the troglodytes would have made a better succress of running Pakistan than the Muslim savages who populate it.

71 Gmac  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:07:07am

Well, this is going to be interesting.

72 Richard Romano  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:07:11am

They better go full out now and blast that area and let these murderers have it once and for all! Kill this cancer before it kills you!

73 Render  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:07:13am

About the Paki nukes...

[Link: www.fas.org...]

[Link: www.globalsecurity.org...]

The theory is that the Paki nukes are both equipped with US designed Permissive Action Link safety systems and stored partially assembled.

That may be about as secures as the US can make them, without just taking them.

It's not as if Taliban/Al-Q haven't already targeted those nukes.

[Link: www.longwarjournal.org...]

[Link: formerspook.blogspot.com...]

===

FIZZLE,
R

74 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:07:18am

re: #35 Carl in Jerusalem

Was Bhutto Hindu or Muslim?

Muslim

75 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:07:20am

re: #52 jjmckay1216

re: #36 M. Bensson-Levi

When do u think this visit will be called off?


Two weeks from never. Dubya & Condi seem to want the creation of the state of Palestine to be their legacy of peace in the Middle East.

76 Lion of the Red Mountain  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:08:17am

Very sad day for Pakistan. I wouldn't rule out collusion between Musharraf and the Jihadists.

77 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:08:26am

re: #58 Iron Fist

re: #34 lawhawk,

I'm afraid that the best of a bad lot is what the Mohammedan world has to offer us for the forseable future. And, as we see here, if it is too good of a bad lot, the Mohammedans will kill them.

It'll be interesting to see if anyone "moderate" will step up, now. Bhutto had a lot of "secular progressives" as her followers in Pakistan, mainly because she was a woman. It's a given that there'll be a civil war over this, but I wonder if there are any real pro-west and moderate Muslims in Pakistan worth a lick, right now. I have my doubts.

78 So?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:08:33am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

This exposes Pakistan in all its glory. A failed state, which back in 1954 was on a par with Taiwan. Look where we are 54 years on. Taiwan is a wealthy and progressive Westernised country, whilst Pakistan is a semiliterate Islamic craphole with open sewers, a 30% literacy rate, overrun with savages who'll do this sort of thing with no regrets - and much more worryingly - armed with nukes. And why? You've guessed: Islam! Those who can plan and do this sort of thing to Benazir Bhutto wouldn't baulk at eliminating 6 million Israelis, 7 million Londoners, 17 million New Yorkers, or Calcutta's 18 million residents if they had the chance. Lets be in no doubt as to what gets taught in the madrassahs. The pro-Jihad press in Pakistan wanted this to happen just as the pro-Nazi press in Germany wanted the Reichstag to go up in flames. But Bhutto's killers represent something far worse and much darker than Nazism or Communism. They represent the new wannabe order in Pakistan, then the world. The repercussions of this atrocity will reverberate right across the Muslim world. Islamic Intolerance is on the march, yet intellectually paralysed by 40 years of political correctness, we dare not call a spade a spade. We dare not expose Islam for what it is, lest we get accused of racism. We dare not tell the families of victims of Islamic atrocities about the commands to murder non-Muslims in the texts of the Koran, Sira and hadith, nor the rewards of 72 virgins promised for these murderous acts. Any attempts to tell the truth on far too many messageboards leads to these truthtelling posts being removed. Here in the West, we have far too many stupid leaders who still cling to the asinine belief that Islam is a religion of peace, contrary to the evidence of 14 centuries of ravenous bloodletting and suffering on an epic scale, when in full technicolor, it is a religion of murder, bloodlust, savagery, sadism, extreme cruelty, misogyny, infidel-hatred, viciously antisemitic, anti-progressive, destructive, wishes to destroy all pleasure, slags us off as immoral whilst at the same time elevating mass murderers to martyrdom.

EXCELLENT POST. DO YOU MIND IF I POST IT ON ANOTHER BLOG...?YOU SAY IT ALL, AND SO WELL...

I AM TRULY SADDENED BY HER DEATH. She was a fearless woman who just 2-3 weeks ago said she knew her life was in danger, that there would be attempts to murder her, but her mission and calling was far greater.

RIP

79 freetoken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:08:39am

re: #65 Snowflake

Call me a cynic, but she may be more valuable as a martyr of democracy than an actual leader of it. There is a long history of corruption associated with her, some is probably fabricated, but still, where there is smoke...

CYNIC!

However, an insightful cynic...

80 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:08:45am
re: #59 EC Marm

re: #42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?


Kos Kids mourn for one half second, then point finger:


Great! And yes, Republic lurkers, it's Bush's fault. Like everything else in the totally whacked Middle East is right now. When you upset an entire region, this is what you get.Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21by funluvn1 on Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 05:13:50 AM PST

18 positive dings at last count...By the Geographically challenged kosers


Sometimes I wonder which ones are more of a threat to us: the Islaomonazis or their stooges in the West.

Good grief.

81 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:09:17am

re: #59 EC Marm

re: #42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?


Kos Kids mourn for one half second, then point finger:


Great! And yes, Republic lurkers, it's Bush's fault. Like everything else in the totally whacked Middle East is right now. When you upset an entire region, this is what you get.Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21by funluvn1 on Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 05:13:50 AM PST

18 positive dings at last count...By the Geographically challenged kosers

Morons.

82 CLLRusso  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:09:26am

The religion of peace strikes again.

Rest in peace, brave lady.

Islam simply could not let her live.

83 funkyfantom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:09:39am

Bottom line - the US and India need to co-ordinate a lightning strike that will take out all 28,000 madrassas in Pakistan.

84 yochanan  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:09:40am

SO MUCH FOR WHORLED PEAS

85 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:10:02am

re: #73 Render

About the Paki nukes...

[Link: www.fas.org...]

[Link: www.globalsecurity.org...]

The theory is that the Paki nukes are both equipped with US designed Permissive Action Link safety systems and stored partially assembled.

That may be about as secures as the US can make them, without just taking them.

It's not as if Taliban/Al-Q haven't already targeted those nukes.

[Link: www.longwarjournal.org...]

[Link: formerspook.blogspot.com...]

===

FIZZLE,
R

There's a PDF out there with every location marked and analyzed,, I haven't linked or published it because some of the analysis in it is too close Render. You can find it if you dig however, it's relatively recent.

86 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:10:33am

This from Bloomberg:

Bhutto attributed her interest in politics to the assassination of her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the prime minister overthrown by General Mohammad Zia ul-Haq in a 1977 military coup.

Zia ul-Haq went on to become president in 1978. The elder Bhutto, founder of the Pakistan Peoples Party, was hanged in 1979 after his conviction on charges of authorizing the murder of an opponent. Both Bhutto’s brothers were also murdered.

`It Chose Me’

“I didn’t choose this life, it chose me,” Bhutto wrote in the preface to the second edition of her autobiography, Daughter of the East, in April 2007. “Born in Pakistan, my life mirrors its turbulence, its tragedies and its triumphs. Pakistan is no ordinary country. And mine has been no ordinary life.”

Bhutto was imprisoned for five years, mostly in solitary confinement, just before her father’s execution. She later lived in London, returning to Pakistan in 1986. She was married to a man from a land-owning family of agriculturists in 1987.

“An arranged marriage was the price in personal choice I had to pay for the political path my life had taken,” she wrote in her autobiography. “My own parents had married for love and I had grown up believing the day would come when I would fall in love and marry a man of my own choosing.”

Zia ul-Haq’s dictatorship ended when he was killed in a plane crash in 1988. Bhutto then became the first elected woman prime minister of an Islamic nation. Her government was dismissed in 1990. She won a second term in 1993 and was dismissed once again on charges of corruption in 1996.

87 Ben Hur  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:10:35am

re: #55 freetoken

re: #47 Ben Hur

I guess this means that Pakistan just wasn't ready for a female Prime Minister.

... to return to her former position.

Humor, my friend. Humor.

Have I been gone that long?

88 pelayo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:11:08am

Bhutto was one of the best and most pro-Western leaders in Pakistan.


The danger now is that the country could descend into revolution or civil war.The last thing the West can afford in instability in a state which is both Islamic and nuclear.

89 Spiny Norman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:11:39am

re: #59 EC Marm

re: #42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?
Kos Kids mourn for one half second, then point finger:

Have they claimed "Bush and Cheney's fingerprints are all over it", like the paint-Huffers have?

90 zellmad  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:11:52am

Yes, Islamic terrorism has struck again in Pakistan. The irony of course is that the "democratic" opposition will blame Musharraf and the army for her assassination making him even less popular. They're not as dumb as one might think.

91 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:12:21am

re: #76 Lion of the Red Mountain

Very sad day for Pakistan. I wouldn't rule out collusion between Musharraf and the Jihadists.

I don't know but I don't think so. Didn't they also try to kill him, too? It's a mess over there. The good guys (I'm sure they're there) are well-hidden, these days, and for good reason.

92 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:12:50am

re: #78 So?

I usually just link to the original post with the instruction, "read this."

93 SpiritOf1683  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:13:04am

re: #78 So?

re: #31 SpiritOf1683


This exposes Pakistan in all its glory. A failed state, which back in 1954 was on a par with Taiwan. Look where we are 54 years on. Taiwan is a wealthy and progressive Westernised country, whilst Pakistan is a semiliterate Islamic craphole with open sewers, a 30% literacy rate, overrun with savages who'll do this sort of thing with no regrets - and much more worryingly - armed with nukes. And why? You've guessed: Islam! Those who can plan and do this sort of thing to Benazir Bhutto wouldn't baulk at eliminating 6 million Israelis, 7 million Londoners, 17 million New Yorkers, or Calcutta's 18 million residents if they had the chance. Lets be in no doubt as to what gets taught in the madrassahs. The pro-Jihad press in Pakistan wanted this to happen just as the pro-Nazi press in Germany wanted the Reichstag to go up in flames. But Bhutto's killers represent something far worse and much darker than Nazism or Communism. They represent the new wannabe order in Pakistan, then the world. The repercussions of this atrocity will reverberate right across the Muslim world. Islamic Intolerance is on the march, yet intellectually paralysed by 40 years of political correctness, we dare not call a spade a spade. We dare not expose Islam for what it is, lest we get accused of racism. We dare not tell the families of victims of Islamic atrocities about the commands to murder non-Muslims in the texts of the Koran, Sira and hadith, nor the rewards of 72 virgins promised for these murderous acts. Any attempts to tell the truth on far too many messageboards leads to these truthtelling posts being removed. Here in the West, we have far too many stupid leaders who still cling to the asinine belief that Islam is a religion of peace, contrary to the evidence of 14 centuries of ravenous bloodletting and suffering on an epic scale, when in full technicolor, it is a religion of murder, bloodlust, savagery, sadism, extreme cruelty, misogyny, infidel-hatred, viciously antisemitic, anti-progressive, destructive, wishes to destroy all pleasure, slags us off as immoral whilst at the same time elevating mass murderers to martyrdom.

EXCELLENT POST. DO YOU MIND IF I POST IT ON ANOTHER BLOG...?YOU SAY IT ALL, AND SO WELL...

I AM TRULY SADDENED BY HER DEATH. She was a fearless woman who just 2-3 weeks ago said she knew her life was in danger, that there would be attempts to murder her, but her mission and calling was far greater.

RIP


Permission granted.

94 freetoken  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:13:30am

re: #87 Ben Hur

Have I been gone that long?

I blame it on the avatar...

95 cagney  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:13:37am

Afternoon Lizards

Appreciate this is OT for this sad piece of news but there is an article about reports that British Military intelligence have been holding secret talks with the Taliban in Afghanistan and that diplomats, including one British, have been passing funds to them.

If I may quote the footnote to this article:

The words "war on terror" will no longer be used by the Government to describe attacks on the public, the chief prosecutor said yesterday.

Sir Ken Macdonald said terrorist fanatics were not soldiers fighting a war but simply members of an aimless "death cult".

The Director of Public Prosecutions said: "We resist the language of warfare, and I think the Government has moved on this. It no longer uses this sort of language. London is not a battlefield.

"The people who were murdered on July 7 were not the victims of war. The men who killed them were not soldiers. They were fantasists, narcissists, murderers and criminals and need to be responded to in that way."

His remarks signal a change in emphasis across Whitehall, where the 'war on terror' language has officially been ditched.

Officials were concerned it could act as a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda, which is determined to manufacture a battle between Islam and the West.

The term 'Islamic terrorist' will also no longer be used. Officials believe it is unhelpful because it appears to directly link the religion to terrorist atrocities.

In an interview with BBC Radio's World at One, Sir Ken made a fresh attack on plans to extend beyond 28 days the length of time a terror suspect can be held without trial.

He said that the evidence had shown that the existing limit was working well and he accused ministers of legislating on the basis of "hypotheticals".

I can't find any links to verify it but googling Sir Ken MacDonald, is far as I can gather occupies on the top legal positions in the countries, comes across as a bit of a moonbat, hardly the best choice for dealing with terrorism which seems to be under his remit.

96 eon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:14:43am

re: #53 resize

re: #40 Leauki

"this is going on because al qaeda wants to take over and have a home base that already has nukes"

If Al Qaeda take over Pakistan, India will invade.

And that invasion must happen quickly and at almost any cost. Otherwise India's big cities will be glass.

I wonder who Iran will support?

The new Islamic Government of Pakistan, of course. Probably with troops, if needed. Definitely with "assistance" to any terrorists with dreams of martyring themselves in front of the Taj Mahal.

From the mullahs' POV, bad news for anyone not 100% on their side is good news for them. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend", or more accurately, "Anybody I don't like needs to die, and I don't care how they get the chop!"

And consider this; they have already been caught out lending aid to the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, off the Indian south coast. So it's not like they don't already have a track record of sticking their oar in troubled waters in the region. (Which they consider part of The Caliphate, of course.)

This is not a war against a nation-state. It is a war against a supranational movement as widespread, as ruthless, and as potentially deadly, as the old Comintern every imagined itself to be in Trotsky and Lenin's most ecstatic dreams. And (surprise, surprise!) it has attracted the approval and even collaboration of many of the same sort of "intellectuals" here and abroad. (In fact, in a lot of cases, they're even the same "in-Duh-viduals", as Scott Adams might say.)

We forget this at our peril.

cheers

eon

97 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:14:55am

Huffposters showing the love.

scampy123 (See profile | I'm a fan of scampy123)
If only we could read that Bush and Blair had been blown to bits with this greedy corrupt bitch who was persuaded to return for the American style of imposed democracy.
Why have the war criminals Bush and Blair have not been assasinated?

Reply | posted 09:46 am on 12/27/2007

Bluedanube (See profile | I'm a fan of Bluedanube)
A tragedy for democratic reform in Pakistan. A preview of what opponents to the Republican Party can expect?
Reply | posted 09:40 am on 12/27/2007

98 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:15:00am

re: #75 Who Watches the Watchmen?

re: #52 jjmckay1216

re: #36 M. Bensson-Levi

When do u think this visit will be called off?


Two weeks from never. Dubya & Condi seem to want the creation of the state of Palestine to be their legacy of peace in the Middle East.

They want their Nobel, and they want to get theirs before Dr. Slick gets his.

99 So?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:15:08am

Meanwhile Putin is struting his balls with this:::

The White House expressed concern Wednesday over Iran's announcement that Russia would supply S-300 air missile defense systems to the Islamic republic.

[Link: www.breitbart.com...]

~~~

Tired of hearing how concerned The White House is about this, that and the other thing. If they were truly concerned about the war on terror, they would have carpet bombed the mountainous regions of Pakistan where these Jihadi a-holes hangout and might have avoided the tragedy that befell Bhutto today.

Time to show Putin he's not the big KGB dick he once was.
Time to bomb the shit out of Iran before their peacock feathers get too cocky. Time to make up for the mistake we just made in Pakistan. Yes they are all related. As the expression goes, Mr. Bush, shit or get off the pot.


~~~

100 Sharmuta  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:15:25am

The religion of misogyny strikes again. Rest in Peace, Benazir.

101 Paul  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:15:26am

A nation of Rage Boys.

102 EC Marm  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:15:51am

Benazir Bhutto
Born: June 21, 1953
Died: December 27, 1007

103 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:16:03am

We just need to hug some jihadis.

- airhead peaceniks

104 2blue4u  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:16:04am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

How very true...

I know fairly well both Pak and KSA - been there working. They are the most dangerous (because they have the means to destroy so much).

In spite of everything, Pervez is the best chance to keep Pak from erupting - for how long a time? The situation can change overnight - what can we do about it?

Here in the West, we have far too many stupid leaders who still cling to the asinine belief that Islam is a religion of peace, contrary to the evidence of 14 centuries of ravenous bloodletting and suffering on an epic scale

We have such leaders because we voted them in the office, to do exactly this. As long as the majority among us thinks so, there is little which can be achieved, and the fanatics will have the upper hand.

105 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:16:18am

re: #63 JammieWearingFool

This is going to get ugly? The situation in Pakistan has been ugly for years. It's gotten worse to be sure, and today isn't going to help either.

Al Qaeda is taking responsibility for the attack btw. Figures.

106 trigger girlie  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:16:30am

re: #21 resize

I'm sure Iran has a safe place to hold them for the Pakis meanwhile...

107 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:16:46am

re: #80 Gang of One

Sometimes I wonder which ones are more of a threat to us: the Islaomonazis or their stooges in the West.

Speaking as a Vietnam vet, I'd say the stooges. They are the ones who helped the US lose the war in Vietnam, and the Islamo-fascist enabler/stooges in the west are hell-bent on helping the US lose in this war.

They are protected by the constitution, as well it should be, but we've got to see them for what they really are: a cancer within.

I believe they can be excized with knowledge and exposure (thanks, Charles).

108 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:17:26am
'Bad news from Pakistan.'

Not necessarily. She was a corrupted POS, the daughter of a corrupted POS, who felt she was owed a ruling position.

Human tragedy aside, she was a destabilizing influence who was doing Musharaf no favors.

Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

109 sarah  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:17:52am

re: #97 JammieWearingFool

How would I have guessed that would have been said?

110 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:17:56am

re: #105 lawhawk

re: #63 JammieWearingFool

This is going to get ugly? The situation in Pakistan has been ugly for years. It's gotten worse to be sure, and today isn't going to help either.

Al Qaeda is taking responsibility for the attack btw. Figures.

By that I meant possible civil war forthcoming (within one of the links).

Trying to keep up here.

111 Endangered in MASS  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:18:03am

re: #12 tommylotto

Roger that.

112 MODERATIONIST[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:18:11am
113 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:19:01am

This will certainly have the effect of polarizing the sides -- in the end moderates outnumber the rage boy contingent by far ( the last full election MMA got only 11%)
It's going to be interesting to see what rises up next.

114 Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:19:44am

Pakistan is a truly a failed state. It is funny (ironic) that the Left and paleocons think that Israel is a failed state and was a mistake. I do not see them calling for Pakistan to be dissolved.

115 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:19:52am

How sad, yet anticipated.
With each presidential election cycle it is said "this is the most important..."
Well folks.. this upcoming election may be the most important? But, in reality, the last two were. How sad. The Religion of Peace my ass. How many bodies will it take to act?

116 realwest  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:19:58am

re: #97 JammieWearingFool Hey Jammie! Didja get my e-mail from last night?!

117 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:20:04am

re: #97 JammieWearingFool

Huffposters showing the love.

scampy123 (See profile | I'm a fan of scampy123)
If only we could read that Bush and Blair had been blown to bits with this greedy corrupt bitch who was persuaded to return for the American style of imposed democracy.
Why have the war criminals Bush and Blair have not been assasinated?

Reply | posted 09:46 am on 12/27/2007Bluedanube (See profile | I'm a fan of Bluedanube)
A tragedy for democratic reform in Pakistan. A preview of what opponents to the Republican Party can expect?
Reply | posted 09:40 am on 12/27/2007

Can the HoPo's name ONE instance of a Republican suicide bombing?

Can they even name the party affiliation of four the the five American Presidents who have been assassinated? (The fifth being the son of an Irish Bootlegger had to run as a Democrat.)

118 So?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:20:08am


Permission granted.

Thanks Spiritof1683!

119 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:21:15am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

You are absolutely spot on. And the real tragedy is that you will be persecuted for speaking this truth.

I lose all hope.

120 Killian Bundy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:21:58am

re: #73 Render

The theory is that the Paki nukes are both equipped with US designed Permissive Action Link safety systems and stored partially assembled.

That may be about as secures as the US can make them, without just taking them.

That used to be my working theory too.

/and then the NYT dumped on it, frightening if true

121 jjmckay1216  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:22:44am

Huffposters have it ALL figgered out

"While not saying that this is directly King George's fault, I do believe he is indirectly responsible. Playing both sides of the fence between Musharraff and Bhutto was bound to piss off Musharraff and his supporters, thus, Musharraff needed to eliminate his strongest opposition. Musharraff will continue to pay lip service to King George (who will eat it up as truth and continue throwing money at him), while he continues to proclaim his "innocence" and will once again call for Martial Law in Pakistan under the guise of "saving the democracy".

King George touches Afghanistan, and it goes to hell in a hand basket; King George then touches Iraq and THAT goes to hell in a hand basket; then King George aligns himself in the "war on terrah" with Musharraff, who, by the way, smiles as he holds out one hand collecting billions of our taxpayer dollars in "aid" while firmly giving us the finger with the other, happily continues his alliance with the Taliban/Al Qaeda (who I firmly believe are beneficiaries of a large part of that "aid") and now Pakistan is going to hell in a hand basket ... me also thinks King George is no King Midas."

122 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:22:47am

re: #97 JammieWearingFool

Daily Kos isn't much better.

123 Syrah  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:23:04am

ROPMA

124 Wendya  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:23:05am

re: #20 PoorMan

Back in the 70's her dad was a piece of work.

The apple didn't fall far from the tree with her either. That's said, I think it takes a certain level of corruption and patronage to rule a country like Pakistan and survive your term. Al Qaeda might have misjudged the ramifications of whacking Bhutto. If Musharraf is smart, he'll work out a deal with India under the table and allow them to deal with the extremists on the border where I'm sure India is already mobilizing.

125 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:23:45am

re: #119 Gang of One

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

You are absolutely spot on. And the real tragedy is that you will be persecuted for speaking this truth.

I lose all hope.

Not as long as LGF and anti-idiotarians are allowed to speak out. Don't lose hope. If you do, another brilliant voice gets lost.

126 Sizzlack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:23:46am

In this country if you dont like someones politics, you write an article for a newspaper or blog or magazine. You make a commercial. You give a speech.
In the Islamic world if you dont like someones politics, you simply shoot them or blow them to pieces. If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

127 maddogg  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:24:22am

re: #10 Ward Cleaver

And I was commenting yesterday how the security forces were doing a good job. Maybe they weren't. Or maybe now they've done their best work?

It seems to me that most everything can be bought in Islamic countries, why would "security" be any different?

128 Shr_Nfr  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:24:25am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

And you are talking about the "successful" part of Pakistan. Please remember that the original partition included Bangladesh too.

Its quite simple, if you take 50% of your population and make them into unproductive chattel and then take the other 50% of the population and have them learning how to chant a pile of gook in a language that they don't understand, you do not have a successful country. While there is much more to life than just material things, being the good steward of all that is around you made by whatever higher power you believe in takes more than what they are doing.

129 Render  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:24:53am

re: #95 cagney

One EU Representative and one UN Representative were just kicked out of Afghanistan for doing exactly that. Negotiating with and giving money to the Taliban elements currently trapped in Afghanistan.

Is this the same story?

SAME
OLD
SONG,
R

130 CourDeLion[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:25:03am
131 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:25:06am

re: #59 EC Marm

re: #42 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


I wonder what the KKKosKiddies are going to say about this?

Kos Kids mourn for one half second, then point finger:


Great! And yes, Republic lurkers, it's Bush's fault. Like everything else in the totally whacked Middle East is right now. When you upset an entire region, this is what you get.Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21
by funluvn1 on Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 05:13:50 AM PST

18 positive dings at last count...By the Geographically challenged kosers

They would be more entertaining if they wern't so predictable.

132 Lion of the Red Mountain  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:25:08am

re: #91 Golem Akbar

I had read recently that Bhutto had demanded that Musharraf surrender both posts -head of the army and the presidency. I wonder if this would cause him to think that he couldn't work with her and ordered her assassination, or did a Henry the 2nd and wished it done. But I don't follow Pakistan closely enough to have a real good feel for the situation.

133 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:25:31am

re: #108 Maine's Michael

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

Then count me with the idiots. Democracy is the only hope for humanity.

134 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:26:06am

re: #107 Golem Akbar

Golem, first, welcome home -- I did not know you are a vet.

I agree with you, we have to raise our voices louder and keep our powder drier. After all, we are not the ones with 2A issues ...

135 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:26:26am

re: #126 Sizzlack

If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

I don't know. The left seems to be only now starting to realize how evil communism was.

136 Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:26:26am

re: #124 Wendya

re: #20 PoorMan

Back in the 70's her dad was a piece of work.

I think it takes a certain level of corruption and patronage to rule a country like Pakistan and survive your term. Al Qaeda might have misjudged the ramifications of whacking Bhutto.

I agree with you. It is an extremely violent country (much like rest of the Islamic world).

137 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:27:01am

re: #116 realwest

re: #97 JammieWearingFool Hey Jammie! Didja get my e-mail from last night?!

Haven't checked the mail this morning.

Will take a look in a bit.

138 Spiny Norman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:27:10am

re: #97 JammieWearingFool

Huffposters showing the love.

Should anyone wonder why I call them "paint-Huffers"?

Willful ignorance in action.

139 goddessoftheclassroom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:27:11am

re: #130 CourDeLion

Fears Of Civil War After Bhutto's Assasination

As Benazir Bhutto's supporters riot outside her hospital deathbed, governments and citizens from all over the world are reacting with grief at her assasination.

Acting Secretary General of her party Riaz Khan said: "This is a very tragic incident. It has left a very black hole for Pakistan's masses. Benazir Bhutto was the voice of the Pakistani people. She was killed while Musharraf was sitting there."

His brother Shabbas Sharif said: "I'm shellshocked. It's very bad for this country. Whoever has done this has done the biggest disservice to Pakistan."

He added: "The government must resign, Musharaf must go home, they must hold a very transparent enquiry into Benazir's killing."

Sitting quietly next to her dead body in hospital, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif said that he "vowed to fight your war".

The Russian foreign ministry said it feared the country could descend into terrorism or civil war.

[Link: news.sky.com...]

I really don't think Musharaf is stupid enough to be hehind her assassination. This is a nightmare for him, too. AlQ is more likely--it's a two-for-one for them.

140 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:27:41am

re: #110 JammieWearingFool

re: #105 lawhawk


re: #63 JammieWearingFool

This is going to get ugly? The situation in Pakistan has been ugly for years. It's gotten worse to be sure, and today isn't going to help either.

Al Qaeda is taking responsibility for the attack btw. Figures.


By that I meant possible civil war forthcoming (within one of the links).

Trying to keep up here.

You and Lawhawk are doing great on this, I've linked back to both.

141 kevinmumaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:27:54am

So far, the CIA, Bush, and Cheney have been fingered at DU. I'm as shocked as you. /sarc

142 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:28:14am

re: #133 experiencedtraveller

re: #108 Maine's Michael


And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

Then count me with the idiots. Democracy is the only hope for humanity.

I'm with you, too.

143 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:28:38am

re: #133 experiencedtraveller

One doesn't force elections on savages and expect a working democracy as a result.

144 Laugh a Lot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:29:02am

It's too simple to say Bhutto was killed "because she's a woman" or because she was moderate. Bhutto's return to Pakistan was managed in a most reckless way, and her assassination was inevitable. Moreover, as a politician, Bhutto and her family left a long record of corruption charges, money laundering, etc. Many in Pakistan had reasons way beyond her gender to oppose her. This is far more complex than simple misogyny or fear of a progressive. It's about politics and raw power. Always has been. Always will be.

Please, let's not give Hillary an opportunity to wax poetic about the "struggles" of a woman in a man's world.

145 eon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:29:40am

re: #67 paint-right


What is the origin of that word , again? "Assassin"?

Unless the question is rhetorical...

Hashshashin

Or you could just look up the movie Omar Khayyam, starring Cornel Wilde, Debra Paget, and Michael Rennie (Paramount, 1957). It tells the story succinctly, and with style. (No doubt the Islamists consider it an insult. Good.)

cheers

eon

146 MrMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:29:49am

All the evil murder are belong to them.
G_d rest her soul.

147 steveegg  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:30:20am

re: #110 JammieWearingFool

I'd say that train has left the station. It may now not just be in Waziristan.

148 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:30:24am

re: #108 Maine's Michael

Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

I do not argue with you, Maine. I begin to seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there are people in this world who cannot handle the complexity of democracy. I used to think that the very nature of the human soul yearned and thirsted for representative government, free and fair elections, etc. But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Perhaps this Bush Doctrine is a huge error?

149 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:03am

re: #143 Maine's Michael

re: #133 experiencedtraveller

One doesn't force elections on savages and expect a working democracy as a result.

Well, yes, it's a process. Palestinian democracy may be an oxymoron now, but it's the only way those people will ever be free. The process has to start somehow, of course that is the problem, we all know that.

150 harrylook  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:17am

If only Pelosi had met with the jihadis and donned a burqa and proclaimed the jihadis' desire for peace, none of this would have happened. It's Pelosi's fault.

151 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:20am

What with Pakistan nukes in play, if Pakistan descends into a civil war over this (and I suspect it won't), it will have been the most monumental fuck up of the Baker admin.

WTF were they thinking, forcing Bhutto on Musharraf?

Don't they understand the way things need to work, in that part of the world, for the next 50 years or so?

152 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:22am

Freaking Islamofacists.

This event simply shows how important it is that the US continue to fight the global war on terrorism, and start pinpoint bombing wherever, and whenever we perceive a threat.

I don't care if it is downtown London or New Delhi. We need to start planting operatives everywhere, and taking out the Islamofascists one by one. And if they live with their families, take them out too, so the seed won't grow.

Any nation which teaches their children that it is okay to martyr onesself to kill innocents need to be wiped out.
Are you listening, Palestinian Authority?

You need to be exterminated if you continue to teach your children to murder innocents.


Just wait until Al Qaeda is successful in the USA again. It will be the catalyst for the destruction of fanatical islamic governments across the globe.

Right now, England is in the greatest jeopardy from Islam ... and they don't even realize that the cancer is spreading.


Stupid Liberals!

153 Spiny Norman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:33am

re: #135 Golem Akbar

re: #126 Sizzlack

If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.
I don't know. The left seems to be only now starting to realize how evil communism was.

Except that most reviews take the filmmakers to task for not "showing" how that interference "created" the Taliban, al-Qaeda and led "directly" to 9/11.

No, the Left will never get it.

154 Render  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:31:47am

re: #120 Killian Bundy

All too likely. That's why I used the word "theory."

India has got to be sitting at DEFCON 2 about now.

NO
MUSHROOMS
PLEASE,
R

155 kevinmumaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:19am

re: #131 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Another day, another devalued dollar

? KOSkidz are at their amusing best when their multiple (yet unrelated) gripes come out in the same breath. Amusing, yet confusing.

156 cagney  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:26am

re: #129 Render

Hard to say if two stories are the same.

The UK government throughout the years have had secret talks with the IRA despite official statements to the contrary.

The difference this time is that as seen the present UK government is so compromised with pressure groups that the logic they use to justify these transactions is dubious at best.

157 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:34am

re: #132 Lion of the Red Mountain

re: #91 Golem Akbar

I had read recently that Bhutto had demanded that Musharraf surrender both posts -head of the army and the presidency. I wonder if this would cause him to think that he couldn't work with her and ordered her assassination, or did a Henry the 2nd and wished it done. But I don't follow Pakistan closely enough to have a real good feel for the situation.

Zawahiri claimed credit, Zawahiri is trying to kill Musharraf and Sherpao as well. It's not Mushy.

158 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:35am

re: #150 harrylook

If only Pelosi had met with the jihadis and donned a burqa and proclaimed the jihadis' desire for peace, none of this would have happened. It's Pelosi's fault.


LMAO!

159 BarCodeKing  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:45am

It's a very sad situation, but anyone who was surprised by this hasn't been paying attention. It was only a matter of time.

160 MartinLeaf  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:32:49am

Remember whose fault this is: Our own little Dhimmi Carter.

It was during Dhimmi Carter's watch that Pakistan openly enriched Uranium. He did nothing about it.

He also armed Bin laden as Dhimmitude to the Iranian Islamists that seized the US embassy in Iran, hoping that licking their boots would help him out.

Oh, I guess that what happens when you elect a "nuclear expert". Check out his real credentials, I have. All his academic credentials were lies.

161 MrMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:00am

re: #148 Gang of One


But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Recognition of the divine genius of our Founding Fathers.

162 BingoBunny  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:08am

Bhutto Helped create this mess for the world.. Pakistan got nukes under her watch.. supported radical islam.. supplied troops to defend the oil tick governments of the middle east.. she was as corrupt as they come in islamic politics.. she started a whirlwind we will reap a hurricane.

163 realwest  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:14am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683 With all due respect, I have two friends who are Pakistani (although one became a US Citizen) and they wouldn't recognize the Pakistan you describe. Not at all. And the US citizen Pakistani (who's whole family still lives in and around Lahore) just returned from his annual 6 week "vacation" there (he works about 70 hours a week the rest of the year so he can take that 6 weeks off) had nothing but BAD things to say about Bhutto - she was as corrupt as corrupt can get according to him. Also according to him and to his (and my) friend, Al-Q is having trouble gaining traction in Pakistan (not the Warziristan and Frontier provinces which are largely run by warlords who do what Al-Q says or else!) is because Paki's see the deliberate mass murder of Muslims as something genuinely BAD.
Moreover, they and their families supported Mushareef in taking over the Red Mosque.
Finally don't forget how much money the US has shelled out to Taiwan, while India had British help; the Paki's, until recently, have been pretty much on their own.


Sorry y'all but I gotta scoot - hope to see you later.

164 bullrat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:17am

The murderous freaks... but someone/something else will be blamed instead of islam indoctrination... another excuse will be given instead of looking at the root cause of bloody islam... around we go in a big circle... do-si-do... swing your partner and around we go...

165 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:21am

re: #125 Golem Akbar


Don't lose hope. If you do, another brilliant voice gets lost.

Thank you, Sir. I will do my best.

166 TexasPatriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:21am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

Unfortunately, you are absolutely right. When are we going to wake up and fight back?

167 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:36am

Not for the faint of heart - photos of the carnage via Getty Images. One of the photos appears to have been taken moments after the bomb detonated.

168 zionist122  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:41am

oy vey! this is very bad. cant anyone do anything to stop this madness? i was up all night with the heebee jeebees and felt wierd like something wouldhappen since it is the holidays...

169 Leatherneck  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:33:50am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

Heheh, you said craphole.

Seriously though, well said. Enough is enough.

170 Endangered in MASS  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:34:15am

re: #80 Gang of One

"Sometimes I wonder which ones are more of a threat to us: the Islaomonazis or their stooges in the West."

Any threat to the West is because of the stooges of the west.

171 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:34:22am

re: #148 Gang of One

re: #108 Maine's Michael


Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.


I do not argue with you, Maine. I begin to seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there are people in this world who cannot handle the complexity of democracy. I used to think that the very nature of the human soul yearned and thirsted for representative government, free and fair elections, etc. But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Perhaps this Bush Doctrine is a huge error?

I don't think so. Democracy is the only long-term answer. In the short term, no, it's not workable with a lot of cultures. The Arab so-called Palestinians, for example, may be generations away from democracy, but eventually they'll have to come to it, or kill themselves off. Yeah, they may do that, first, but it's not the best of all possible outcomes.

172 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:34:26am

Can anyone actually keep track of the serious world events that are happening all over this world's battleground.
I can see the isolationist view and the global trade and democrasation view.
But, Christ, I quess we will have to somehow split the difference. Which one of our ' promise everything' candidates can deliver.

173 Wendya  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:34:32am

re: #130 CourDeLion


He added: "The government must resign, Musharaf must go home, they must hold a very transparent enquiry into Benazir's killing."

What planet is this guy phoning in from? If the government resigns, who steps in to fill the vacuum? The same people who whacked his sister.

174 Shr_Nfr  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:34:45am

re: #121 jjmckay1216

Too bad that they all are so senile as to forget the fact that the president who armed the Mujahideen in Afghanistan was none other than their favorite peace loving Dhimmi Carter and the president at the time when Bin Laden issued his declaration of war against the US was Zippy Carter.

175 Ben Hur  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:13am

My Spidey sense say Mushu knew.

176 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:18am

re: #149 Golem Akbar

re: #143 Maine's Michael


re: #133 experiencedtraveller

One doesn't force elections on savages and expect a working democracy as a result.


Well, yes, it's a process. Palestinian democracy may be an oxymoron now, but it's the only way those people will ever be free. The process has to start somehow, of course that is the problem, we all know that.


To add to your comment: we've been doing this for 231 years and still haven't perfected democracy. The Islamofacists are still living in the dark ages so naturally it will take longer.

177 MrMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:20am

re: #153 Spiny Norman

the Left will never get it.

Universal truth.

178 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:24am

re: #166 TexasPatriot

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

Unfortunately, you are absolutely right. When are we going to wake up and fight back?


Only when the US suffers through an attack where casualties are in the 10's of thousands ... an d not 1 moment before that.

179 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:31am

Wow, two threads up already before 7:30am PST. Charles, you're up early. Have you taken up bass fishing?

180 shug  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:43am

Has anybody blamed Israel Yet?

181 quesnay  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:46am

And to think that half of the voters would trust the security of our country in the hands of Obama, Edwards or Clinton.

182 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:35:48am

re: #149 Golem Akbar

Is doesn't start with elections, it ends with elections. After rule of law, working executive arms of gov't, economic structure, and cultural acceptance and expectation have been built up and firmly in place.

Parachuting a corrupted 'queen' back into Pakistan, to needle the strongman who has been walking on a razor to keep a fractious Pakistan nominally on the US side, and its nukes reasonabley secure, has got to be one of the dumbest moves ever dreamed up by this, or any, American admin.

183 kevinmumaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:36:31am

re: #108 Maine's Michael

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

This is exactly what the geniuses in the CIA and State Department want us to believe, because Arab dictators are easier to control. It is of course, completely untrue.

184 jcm  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:00am

RIP Bhutto

Hell of a thing to wake up to.

185 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:00am

re: #174 Shr_Nfr

re: #121 jjmckay1216

Too bad that they all are so senile as to forget the fact that the president who armed the Mujahideen in Afghanistan was none other than their favorite peace loving Dhimmi Carter and the president at the time when Bin Laden issued his declaration of war against the US was Zippy Carter.

I don't think it's so much a case of senility as it is a state of denial.

186 Kulhwch  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:36am

Ah, the gelded cowards of islam attempt to achieve tumescence again.  When this nadless asshat assassin is attempting to romp his 72 houris with his baby gerkin, I bet the ghost of Clara Peller* starts screaming from the cheap seats ...

}:)     [* "Where's the beef?"]

187 Spiny Norman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:42am

re: #180 shug

Has anybody blamed Israel Yet?

They're too busy shrieking like 5-year-olds and pointing fingers at the White House.

188 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:48am

Oh, man.

189 Shard  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:51am

RIP Mrs. Bhutto.

Another fine person killed by the religion of peace.

190 mingjaiyo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:37:52am

#66 opinionated I must agree.I have felt from a long time prior to the attacks of 11 Sept. that the growing islamist threat would be the foremost issue of our time. I am daily dismayed by those in the west that either just don't get it or refuse to see it for what it is because the reality scares the shit out of them. I have only one criteria for president in the upcoming election-how will that person deal with the islamists. Among those running it seems all the front runners are concerned with anything else but islamofacism and it's spread.Talk all you want about abortion,healthcare,immigration,two Americas,taxes,etc.None of it means shit if the islamists win. We are repeating in Afghanistan what we did in VietNam...we are allowing,for any number of reasons, the enemy to have a base of operations across a border we dare not cross. In VietNam it was the countries of Laos and Cambodia (only visited by those in the secret units of MAVCSOG).Today it is the area of Waziristan and in particular the city of Quetta where the Taliban openly march in the street daily.This war will never be truly won until this issue is addressed and the islamists confronted directly through every means-calling the enemy by name and utilizing every political,economic,educational,and military option available.

191 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:38:16am

re: #161 MrMom

re: #148 Gang of One


But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Recognition of the divine genius of our Founding Fathers.

Yes.

192 kyle_st  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:38:22am

Silly me. I thought Islam was a religion of peace.

193 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:38:39am

re: #22 lawhawk

Bhutto put herself in extreme danger from the moment she stepped back in Pakistan. Her enemies would not tolerate her presence, and the Islamists would seek to kill her because she had the audacity to think that a woman's place was anywhere but hidden behind the burkha and never to be seen doing anything more than serving her husband.

Both groups of people (and there were commonalities between the two - they aren't mutually exclusive) are going to try and take advantage of the situation.

Throw in the fact that Sharif's followers came under attack today as well, and you've got a recipe for disaster. Musharraf is ill-prepared to deal with this crisis, as his waffling ways have helped encourage the Islamists. Sure, one can point to his occasional crackdowns, but it's the appeasement that gives the Islamists hope that they can take down the government and replace it with an Islamist regime.

More here.

It took courage but you are correct. She knew what she was getting into. There was a reason she was in exile.

194 razorbacker  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:38:43am

Freedom is a strange thing. It is held so cheap by those that have it that they will throw it away.

It is valued so dear by those that don't have it that they will die so that their progeny may have it.

As I say, freedom is a strange thing.

195 Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:38:50am

Suicide bombing is a national past time in Islamoland.

196 Sizzlack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:39:23am

re: #153 Spiny Norman

re: #135 Golem Akbar

re: #126 Sizzlack

If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

I don't know. The left seems to be only now starting to realize how evil communism was.

Except that most reviews take the filmmakers to task for not "showing" how that interference "created" the Taliban, al-Qaeda and led "directly" to 9/11.

No, the Left will never get it.

I suppose its because the left prefers to play the blame game instead of trying to figure out what to do going forward. At the time, the US did what it needed to do to win the Cold War. An unfortunate side product of that was the creation of the Taliban. I prefer to try and figure out what to do now that they exist, here in reality, than to sit around and bitch and moan about how what we did 30 years ago resulted in the something today. Thats just the unfortunate way of the world. While most of us are going to be concerned about where Pakistan is headed in the future, I have a feeling DK is going to be mostly concerned with finding fault with those they hate most. And then continuing to do nothing but blame that person for anything that takes place in the future that doesnt go our way.

197 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:39:34am

re: #153 Spiny Norman

re: #135 Golem Akbar


re: #126 Sizzlack
If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.
I don't know. The left seems to be only now starting to realize how evil communism was.

Except that most reviews take the filmmakers to task for not "showing" how that interference "created" the Taliban, al-Qaeda and led "directly" to 9/11.

No, the Left will never get it.

I saw the movie on Christmas day (the day the Jews go to the movies...heh). I voted for the writer/producer Aaron Sorkin for a Fiskie, so don't get me wrong, here. The movie did show that some "liberal Democrats" in the 80s did see communism as evil. And for one of their most outspoken voices (Sorkin) to make this movie, he had to believe that. Of course he tried to spin it against what we are doing today, but I don't think he succeeded.

I also believe that anytime Al Qayda kills someone, like Bhutto, it helps galvanize the west against them. We don't need another 9/11 to do that. Just more assasinations like they did today.

198 Silhouette  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:39:57am

They keep coming, they never give up on death.

We have to succeed every time, they just have to succeed once to kill.

199 kafir  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:00am

Many times I have pointed out that, eventually, the muslims would go one step too far. At that point, even their strongest supporters would shake their heads in disgust and walk away. The language of the cold war, of containment and deterrence, is rapidly taking root where appeasement and PC have been king.

The rubicon has been crossed.

Just like islamic rage boy doesn't have a clue as to why he is a symbol of a completely failed system, culture, and cult, they collectively don't have the slightest clue as to how fed up the rest of the world is dealing with their "peace". We have seen the impact of appeasing gangsters and terrorists. We have seen the social and moral disaster in letting them remain in power, the human cost of klepto-thugocracy, cloaked in "religion" or ideology.

The brits are starting to get it. See this link. When your greatest allies are saying things like


"Pakistan is doomed to become a battleground for muslim crazies believing in the cult of death."

you know you have issues.

The rest of the world has grown tired of dealing with them. The language of containment and deterrence will likely be on the rise.

Do they have the slightest inkling the damage they are doing to themselves? Would any of you let a jihadi live with a hand on a nuke?

200 mean Gene  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:08am

What horrible news to wake up to this morning.
I have to say, both Mitt Romney and Rudy G.'s comments shortly after hearing the news were spot on.
What, if anything have other candidates said?

And how dare anyone be critcal of Musharrif for not "controlling" Pakistan outside the area where her meeting was.

We cannot "control" every street and alley here, either.
Just last night a next-door neighbor had a gun brandished at him and although police responded they took the word of the resident that the man with the gun was not there. They did nothing!

201 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:25am

re: #178 LANMaster

you've been lurking since 05?
or have you been waiting for the avatars to become available.

202 Golem Akbar  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:38am

re: #176 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

To add to your comment: we've been doing this for 231 years and still haven't perfected democracy. The Islamofacists are still living in the dark ages so naturally it will take longer.

Excellent point!

203 FinallyHere  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:40am

re: #52 jjmckay1216

re: #36 M. Bensson-Levi

Re posted from the D/T

Morning All,

In light of today's events, here's a real head thumper for you. I can only hope that this is in error.

Terrorists' new mission: Protect President Bush
Most active West Bank militant group in security team for Middle East visit

According to Israeli security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Bush's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Bush's convoy and in securing the parameter during the meeting with Abbas.

Unbelievable Stupidity...Starting with the visit to Ramallah!

When do u think this visit will be called off?

This is a mental disease, this is an obsession that Bush and Condi got.
No wonder Condi asked for Clinton's advice.
All this push to restart "peace process" did not ever make any rational sense, so I think they will go ahead with it. As they keep saying:
We will not allow some terrorists, either Islamic or Jewish, stand on a way of Peace ( or our obsession).

As far as I understand this time media is somewhat correct blaming Bush. I am not excusing terrorists, but we do not blame San Francisco tiger, but people who did take adequate actions.

Pushing for Democracy in Pakistan RIGHT NOW, bringing in Bhutto, when suicide attacks we going on, is the same kind of obsession Bush has about creating another terror state, this time instead of Israel.

204 Syrah  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:49am

Will the Friday sermons in the mosques be ale to top th anti- Americanism of Huffpo and the Koslings?

205 hillary clinton  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:40:56am

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

206 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:41:20am

re: #193 Eowyn2

There was a reason she was in exile.

It wasn't because she was a victimized champion of democracy. She left one step ahead of jail time, or worse.

207 Nevergiveup  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:41:21am

This all reminds me of a line from " A Few Good Men " when the little lawyer turns to the character played by Demi Moore and says " this is the difference between paper law and trial law "! Well this is the difference between paper foreign policy and real foreign policy. It was dangerous for our government ( and I have to blame Bush for this- he is President after all ) to pressure Mussaref to let her back in the country and to lift Martial law. It might sound good, but so did the advice Carter gave to the Shah and we all know how well that worked out!

And while I am sorry she Bhutto has been assassinated, let's not make her out to be a beacon of good government or impeccable character. Her former administration was ripe with corruption and there is a reason she was run out Pakistan. Of course unless we are rewriting history here like Condi is doing by calling the Palestinians the Blacks of the Middle East.

This is the kind of foreign policy that often results in deadly consequences for America.

208 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:41:48am

re: #194 razorbacker

Freedom is a strange thing. It is held so cheap by those that have it that they will throw it away.

It is valued so dear by those that don't have it that they will die so that their progeny may have it.

As I say, freedom is a strange thing.

Greetings from NW Arkansas!

209 Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:41:54am

I am certain that Edwards and Barack Obama will be blaming us (as well as Ron Paul).

210 goddessoftheclassroom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:41:58am

re: #176 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

re: #149 Golem Akbar


re: #143 Maine's Michael

re: #133 experiencedtraveller
One doesn't force elections on savages and expect a working democracy as a result.

Well, yes, it's a process. Palestinian democracy may be an oxymoron now, but it's the only way those people will ever be free. The process has to start somehow, of course that is the problem, we all know that.

To add to your comment: we've been doing this for 231 years and still haven't perfected democracy. The Islamofacists are still living in the dark ages so naturally it will take longer.

I think the most important factor is that America WANTED democracy. Islamists would rather be slaves to Mohammad than free people. Some of those who want freedom over there aren't willing to grant it to others.

211 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:04am

re: #126 Sizzlack

In this country if you dont like someones politics, you write an article for a newspaper or blog or magazine. You make a commercial. You give a speech.
In the Islamic world if you dont like someones politics, you simply shoot them or blow them to pieces. If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

Bodies. Lots of bodies. Nothing else!

212 Owl  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:08am

re: #152 LANMaster


Few have the guts. Thank you.

213 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:09am

re: #201 Eowyn2

re: #178 LANMaster

you've been lurking since 05?
or have you been waiting for the avatars to become available.

LOL I guesso. :)

214 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:27am

re: #167 lawhawk

Not for the faint of heart - photos of the carnage via Getty Images. One of the photos appears to have been taken moments after the bomb detonated.

Pictures numbered 4, 22, and 47 (of 60) were taken as the bomb was detonated.

215 Shug  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:34am

It should be intersting to see some of the comments at huffpo, DU and kos in a few hours when they start waking up

216 trigger girlie  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:48am

re: #164 bullrat

I love your avatar! Do si do? you must be from Ewwrope...

217 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:55am

At Huffington Post it's mostly Bush's fault and his cronies fault.

[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]

The media trope is blaming Musharraf for the lack of security, as though the perps hardly exist at all.

218 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:42:57am

re: #196 Sizzlack

re: #153 Spiny Norman


re: #135 Golem Akbar

re: #126 Sizzlack

If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

I don't know. The left seems to be only now starting to realize how evil communism was.

Except that most reviews take the filmmakers to task for not "showing" how that interference "created" the Taliban, al-Qaeda and led "directly" to 9/11.

No, the Left will never get it.


I suppose its because the left prefers to play the blame game instead of trying to figure out what to do going forward. At the time, the US did what it needed to do to win the Cold War. An unfortunate side product of that was the creation of the Taliban. I prefer to try and figure out what to do now that they exist, here in reality, than to sit around and bitch and moan about how what we did 30 years ago resulted in the something today. Thats just the unfortunate way of the world. While most of us are going to be concerned about where Pakistan is headed in the future, I have a feeling DK is going to be mostly concerned with finding fault with those they hate most. And then continuing to do nothing but blame that person for anything that takes place in the future that doesnt go our way.


This is a problem in general with society today. One thing I was taught is to not dwell on the past. You cannot fix your mistakes, but you can learn from them. Instead of doing something constructive people tend to blame others for their circumstances.

Everything bad that happens to me/us/them is someone elses fault. This give control of your life to others as opposed to you actually controlling your life. Personally, I don't want someone else to have that kind of power over me.

219 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:43:08am

re: #212 Owl

re: #152 LANMaster


Few have the guts. Thank you.


True.

When the Moonbats finally come on board (like that will ever happen) it might be too late.

220 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:43:26am

re: #185 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
Im going with a state of insanity.

221 aaron's rantblog  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:00am
222 trigger girlie  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:23am

re: #192 kyle_st

ITs actually "Pieces", not "peace", so everythin is in order!

223 razorbacker  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:27am

re: #208 LANMaster

Hey there. I could use some of your LAN skills to keep this bailing wire and string home net running;)

All hail mighty Microsoft!

224 jcm  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:52am

re: #211 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #126 Sizzlack

In this country if you dont like someones politics, you write an article for a newspaper or blog or magazine. You make a commercial. You give a speech.
In the Islamic world if you dont like someones politics, you simply shoot them or blow them to pieces. If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

Bodies. Lots of bodies. Nothing else!

We know 3000 is not enough.

225 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:57am

re: #171 Golem Akbar

I know what you are saying, and in my heart of hearts I agree -- democracy is the only way. It is the journey toward that end that is both frightening and difficult. My question is can we force it? Can we expect it to take hold so quickly and completely in societies that have not had the transitional stages of representative, secular government?

226 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:44:59am

re: #202 Golem Akbar

re: #176 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

To add to your comment: we've been doing this for 231 years and still haven't perfected democracy. The Islamofacists are still living in the dark ages so naturally it will take longer.

Excellent point!

Why thank you!

It's too bad that we live in such a "I want it and I want it yesterday" society.

227 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:45:26am

re: #206 Maine's Michael

exactly.
jail time in Pak? death sentence.

She got the same sentence, it just took longer.

228 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:45:27am

re: #172 littleO

Can anyone actually keep track of the serious world events that are happening all over this world's battleground.
I can see the isolationist view and the global trade and democrasation view.
But, Christ, I quess we will have to somehow split the difference. Which one of our ' promise everything' candidates can deliver.

In my view Rudy has the sanest policy, you can read it in the Sept / Oct edition of Foreign Affairs. Summed up: be friendly and trade with friendly democracies, be firm with enemies and don't trade. Don't support governments who can't govern. (That would be Abbas.)

229 kevinmumaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:45:58am

Here is a quote of absolute genius from DU:

Progressive Radical (118 posts) Thu Dec-27-07 09:30 AM
87. When I first saw this on the news, my first thought was this was extremely bad.

230 Sharmuta  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:46:04am

re: #133 experiencedtraveller

Then count me with the idiots. Democracy is the only hope for humanity.

You're mot alone. Democracy is the last, best hope for humanity.

And it is true it is not compatible with islam- that is why it is so imperative that Iraq succeeds- to turn a closed minded society into an open minded society. For once- we must put the cart before the horse. Islamic societies do not understand the underlying principles of Democracy- freedom to them is chaos. So we show them it is not. It is a baptism by fire, and so far- it is working. Yes- Democracy is the answer- our last, best hope for all humanity.

231 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:46:07am

re: #220 Eowyn2

re: #185 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
Im going with a state of insanity.


There is that as well.

Or they ignore the fats because the facts are an inconvenient truth.

232 Tigger2005  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:46:45am

Democracy is a rarity in human history. Mostly it's been the strongest and most ruthless in charge, although to be fair, political and diplomatic skill has been as important for effective leadership as ruthlessness. Leaders who rule through terror and brutality alone are usually not very intelligent, IMO.

Usually, human society works pretty much like chimpanzee society. A strong, dominant alpha male who is skillful at manipulating the rest of the troop through reward, punishment, persuasion, force, whatever it takes, is on top. He gets the pick of the chicks, too. The chimp model seems to be the one most used in Islamic countries, South & Central America, etc.

Every once in a while people get tired of living like chimps and decide to stand up and live like men. But again, it doesn't happen that often.

re: #148 Gang of One

re: #108 Maine's Michael


Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.


I do not argue with you, Maine. I begin to seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there are people in this world who cannot handle the complexity of democracy. I used to think that the very nature of the human soul yearned and thirsted for representative government, free and fair elections, etc. But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Perhaps this Bush Doctrine is a huge error?

233 Winmag  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:47:17am

I can't wait to see how the primary candidates are going to use this. This could be Hillarys! big chance or big mistake. Sorry the crazies were finally successful. I saw yesterday that security had stopped a kid with a bomb at a rally she was attending. I thought then that they will never give up. By the way, anybody celebrating this?

234 Sizzlack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:47:37am

re: #218 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I couldnt agree more. Hindsight is 20/20, and while blaming other people for what went wrong might make your conscious feel better, it doesnt change the fact that something still went wrong, and is going to have consequences.

235 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:47:44am

And our vaunted 'Russia Expert' should have been full on working on a carrot and stick plan to keep Russia from deploying a new generation of ICBM's, instead of micromanaging Pakistan's tribal politics or Israel's condo development plans.

236 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:47:48am

re: #189 Shard

RIP Mrs. Bhutto.

Another fine person killed by the religion of peace.

She wasn't exactly a "fine person", but this attack is still savagery.

237 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:06am

re: #218 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


I once told a boyfriend that I am a weak fragile female and he laughed at me. Said I got one of three.

Damn. I want in on the everyone take care of me.

238 sivapragasam  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:06am
239 NYC Conservative  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:43am

I was browsing through BBC (slow work day) and there is a Have your Say where readers comment on stories. There was on specifically about the assassination. If you sort it by Reader Recommended, the comments are really spot on.
Interesting coming from the beeb.

240 releasethehounds!  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:46am

re: #31 Spiritof1683

This exposes Pakistan in all its glory. A failed state, which back in 1954 was on a par with Taiwan. Look where we are 54 years on. Taiwan is a wealthy and progressive Westernised country, whilst Pakistan is a semiliterate Islamic craphole with open sewers, a 30% literacy rate, overrun with savages who'll do this sort of thing with no regrets - and much more worryingly - armed with nukes.

If I'm not mistaken, Pakistan was part of British India but was carved out to create a Muslim state when independance was achieved. Until that time it was governed like the rest of India by the British civil service, with all its trappings. My point? The only difference between India and Pakistan when they became separate, sovereign nations was that Pakistan was a Muslim state while India was not. The different results of statehood are clear. Draw the obvious conclusion.

241 TexasPatriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:49am

re: #178 LANMaster

I think the islamists are smarter than that. They are slowly but surely taking over now without much of a fight. A large scale attack on the US migth cause us to actually fight back.

242 Thanos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:48:57am

re: #230 Sharmuta

re: #133 experiencedtraveller


Then count me with the idiots. Democracy is the only hope for humanity.

You're mot alone. Democracy is the last, best hope for humanity.

And it is true it is not compatible with islam- that is why it is so imperative that Iraq succeeds- to turn a closed minded society into an open minded society. For once- we must put the cart before the horse. Islamic societies do not understand the underlying principles of Democracy- freedom to them is chaos. So we show them it is not. It is a baptism by fire, and so far- it is working. Yes- Democracy is the answer- our last, best hope for all humanity.

Let's not just say Democracy -- Liberty is the essential. Venezuela and Palestine are Democracies in theory, but they don't have liberty and protected rights. The governments don't have checks and balances - Democracy is too vague for me.

243 Eowyn2  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:49:08am

re: #231 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

re: #220 Eowyn2


re: #185 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
Im going with a state of insanity.

There is that as well.

Or they ignore the fats because the facts are an inconvenient truth.

I try to ignore the fats too because they tend to cling to my hips:)

244 Sizzlack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:49:22am

re: #224 jcm

Clearly no amount of bodies is enough. 3,000 is way too many, but in since 2001, I imagine worldwide jihadists have killed at least 100,000 people.

245 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:49:57am

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

246 uptight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:50:07am

It's frustrating and almost predictable that her supporters are raging against Musharraf over this death.

The fact that this was a suicide mission proves that this was not the actions of Musharraf's secret police.

Besides - Al Qaeda are claiming responsibility for the assassination!

If they don't round on the Jihadists now, I have no sympathy with them.

247 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:50:19am

re: #232 Tigger2005

He gets the pick of the chicks, too.

Saddam really was a dumbass then. ever seen his wife?

Assad ain't doing too bad, tho, ditto the midget king of Jordan.

248 Jim in Virginia  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:50:56am

re: #208 LANMaster

LAN Master- Where you at?
I went to HS in Fayetteville. Mom is still there.
(She sent me a stuffed razorback for Christmas)

249 Owl  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:50:56am

re: #197 Golem Akbar


I don't think the vast majority of Americans care. As long as they aren't forced to deal with it - and can just go on watching Dancing with the Stars.

250 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:51:58am

re: #224 jcm

re: #211 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #126 Sizzlack

In this country if you dont like someones politics, you write an article for a newspaper or blog or magazine. You make a commercial. You give a speech.
In the Islamic world if you dont like someones politics, you simply shoot them or blow them to pieces. If this doesnt wake up the left to the reality that is the Middle East...I dont know what will.

Bodies. Lots of bodies. Nothing else!

We know 3000 is not enough.

It will take a city, and then it will be over.
But only for a while.
As the needed targets will not be hit (MM).

251 Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:52:43am

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

I think she was doing a parody.

252 Texas Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:52:43am

It isn't bad news at all.

Bhutto was beloved by Carter and Clinton. That should tell you enough about her-- her ruling was never going to be in the US's interest.

Her assassination shows that alQaeda have moved more strongly into Pakistan than the US should like, but that is largely from the US pushing on the aQ balloon in Afghanistan. We have to expect to keep shifting US resources to bring them to battle wherever they 'breakout'. Bhutto would have been a less reliable host than Musharreff has been for non-declared presence of US troops.

It is a shame that another country can't solve their internal problems without resort to assassination and terror, but the loss of Bhutto is a gain for the US.

253 Sizzlack  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:53:04am

re: #249 Owl

re: #197 Golem Akbar


I don't think the vast majority of Americans care. As long as they aren't forced to deal with it - and can just go on watching Dancing with the Stars.

Thats something that gets me the most. The same people that choose to watch Dancing with the Stars over dealing with a problem are the same ones who bitch and moan when the people who chose to deal with the problem dont execute it perfectly.

254 MarauderBob  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:53:21am

re: #66 opinionated

Possible Civil War in Pakistan?

Nuclear Weapons in the hands of Rage Guy and his friends?

Screw it. We don't care.

We're going to nominate the Republican candidate who genuflects to the only issues that count, who says the right things about abortion and gays.


Sadly, many of those showing the most outrage over the Islamic Movement in Action will be the same ones who nominate said genuflecting pols...cant have them uppity gays and womenfolk killing fetuses! Those are so much more important issues than a nuclear armed Iran or uprising in already nuclear armed Pakistan. Thers is no hope for us I'm afraid.

255 Nevergiveup  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:53:25am

re: #249 Owl

re: #197 Golem Akbar


I don't think the vast majority of Americans care. As long as they aren't forced to deal with it - and can just go on watching Dancing with the Stars.

Well if Pakistan dissolves into civil war and a few bombs disappear, they may start paying attention as the sky lights up!

256 techno  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:53:32am
257 Lion of the Red Mountain  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:53:35am

re: #157 Thanos

Thanks, I did a search after your comment and found a press report.

258 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:54:02am

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

Sarcasm tag only required for imbeciles I guess.

259 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:54:10am

re: #243 Eowyn2

re: #231 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


re: #220 Eowyn2

re: #185 The Pulchritudinous Patriot
Im going with a state of insanity.

There is that as well.
Or they ignore the fats because the facts are an inconvenient truth.

I try to ignore the fats too because they tend to cling to my hips:)


LOL PIMF

260 rawmuse  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:54:55am

Oh, fun. Bad guys with nukes. But, but, but, John Edwards said the WOT is a bumper sticker...

261 hillary clinton  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:55:11am

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

262 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:55:35am

re: #230 Sharmuta

You have been reading Lincoln again. Good for you.

263 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:55:42am

re: #261 hillary clinton

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

Great nic and the icon is a perfect fit!

264 MrMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:56:23am

re: #205 hillary clinton

LOL. From the avatar to the nic to the comment. EXCELLENT!

265 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:56:26am

re: #251 Joel

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

I think she was doing a parody.

Annoying, irritating, and irrelevant.

266 Rodan[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:56:47am
267 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:57:03am

re: #261 hillary clinton

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

I'm off to do some medical stuff. Bye bye.

268 Nevergiveup  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:57:30am

re: #266 Rodan

I'm afraid that Pakistan might become the nezt Iran.
The difference is nukes.

Not for long.

269 laZardo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:58:54am

re: #130 CourDeLion


Sitting quietly next to her dead body in hospital, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif said that he "vowed to fight your war".

That said, Sharif is - as Bill Goldberg once put it - "NEXT."

re: #256 techno

its a really bad time for Pakistan, many people have died today. I pray to Allah, that situation remains calm and the people who are responsible for this mess get what they deserve.

I really don't know what to say to that...'cept I do hope whoever did that will get what they deserve, and not virgins OR raisins.

270 The Other Les  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:59:03am

re: #247 Maine's Michael

re: #232 Tigger2005

He gets the pick of the chicks, too.

Saddam really was a dumbass then. ever seen his wife?

Assad ain't doing too bad, tho, ditto the midget king of Jordan.

I think his first wife was a traditional arab cousin marriage.

Which kind of explains how the sons turned out.

271 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:59:12am

re: #258 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

Sarcasm tag only required for imbeciles I guess.

Yeah. I am an imbecile. Having a bad day, unrelated to all this.

Please accept my apologies, Hill.

272 maddogg  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:59:14am

Say what you will about Musharraf, he is a hard man to kill, and its not for want of trying. Must be something like being the Governor of Hell.

273 Winmag  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 7:59:20am

re: #254 MarauderBob

re: #66 opinionated


Possible Civil War in Pakistan?

Nuclear Weapons in the hands of Rage Guy and his friends?

Screw it. We don't care.

We're going to nominate the Republican candidate who genuflects to the only issues that count, who says the right things about abortion and gays.


Sadly, many of those showing the most outrage over the Islamic Movement in Action will be the same ones who nominate said genuflecting pols...cant have them uppity gays and womenfolk killing fetuses! Those are so much more important issues than a nuclear armed Iran or uprising in already nuclear armed Pakistan. Thers is no hope for us I'm afraid.

This is why I like Rudy. He isn't perfect, or even great, but I do think he is the best to deal with the Islamics ts. I think Rudy would pull the trigger when he needs to. I don't care what the next president thinks about gays or abortion.

274 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:00:49am

re: #223 razorbacker

re: #208 LANMaster

Hey there. I could use some of your LAN skills to keep this bailing wire and string home net running;)

All hail mighty Microsoft!

LOL Well, my LAN skills have been left to rust over the past 5 years, so you'll want to get some help from a "fresher" source. :)

275 gymnast  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:03am

Will Gretta feature the case of the Bhutto murder on her Fox News Show? Not likely, too complicated for it to have much entertainment value except as a musical comedy.

Serious consequences of this event will result in the deaths of thousands before this is over.

276 J.S.  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:09am

In one of the amateur videos (taken shortly after the assassination), the video shows the left-hand-side, rear window, rolled down. It's rolled down -- not shot out. Was this an inside job? Who was in the vehicle? And, who was driving the vehicle? (and thus had access to the windows opening/closing, etc.)

277 sparrowlake  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:12am

re: #171 Golem Akbar

Democracy is the only long-term answer. In the short term, no, it's not workablewith a lot of cultures. The Arab so-called Palestinians, for example, may be generations away from democracy, but eventually they'll have to come to it, or kill themselves off. Yeah, they may do that, first, but it's not the best of all possible outcomes.


Democracy has almost never been successfully imposed from the outside. In the few cases where it has, like Japan or Germany for example, the existing totalitarian structure must first have been completely destroyed.

278 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:15am

re: #248 Jim in Virginia

re: #208 LANMaster

LAN Master- Where you at?
I went to HS in Fayetteville. Mom is still there.
(She sent me a stuffed razorback for Christmas)


Rogers

279 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:18am

re: #273 Winmag

This is why I like Rudy. He isn't perfect, or even great, but I do think he is the best to deal with the Islamics ts. I think Rudy would pull the trigger when he needs to. I don't care what the next president thinks about gays or abortion.

Are you saying Rudy organized the Bhutto hit?

280 mean Gene  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:37am

Hillary just tried to make it into a political plus for women.
A woman who stood for democracy cut down.
Pakistan, as it is, to Hillary, is anti-democratic.
Must be that MEN are in charge, huh.

281 kevinmumaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:40am

re: #261 hillary clinton

You are speaking live right now! And typing. You are the smartest woman in the world.

282 CourDeLion[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:01:48am
283 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:02:09am

re: #242 Thanos

Agreed. Liberty is the key word and the essential element of democracy.

284 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:02:19am

Mark Steyn comments on his former neighbor...

Benazir Bhutto's return to Pakistan had a mad recklessness about it which give today's events a horrible inevitability. As I always say when I'm asked about her, she was my next-door neighbor for a while - which affects a kind of intimacy, though in fact I knew her only for sidewalk pleasantries. She was beautiful and charming and sophisticated and smart and modern, and everything we in the west would like a Muslim leader to be - though in practice, as Pakistan's Prime Minister, she was just another grubby wardheeler from one of the world's most corrupt political classes.

Since her last spell in power, Pakistan has changed, profoundly. Its sovereignty is meaningless in increasingly significant chunks of its territory, and, within the portions Musharraf is just about holding together, to an ever more radicalized generation of young Muslim men Miss Bhutto was entirely unacceptable as the leader of their nation.

There's more.

285 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:02:22am

re: #271 Gang of One

re: #258 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

Sarcasm tag only required for imbeciles I guess.

Yeah. I am an imbecile. Having a bad day, unrelated to all this.

Please accept my apologies, Hill.

No worries. Only those who do and say nothing make no error.

286 Nevergiveup  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:02:32am

re: #279 Maine's Michael

re: #273 Winmag

This is why I like Rudy. He isn't perfect, or even great, but I do think he is the best to deal with the Islamics ts. I think Rudy would pull the trigger when he needs to. I don't care what the next president thinks about gays or abortion.

Are you saying Rudy organized the Bhutto hit?

And you all thought he was in a Hospital in St. Louis. Ha!

287 So?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:02:36am

re: #195 Joel

Suicide bombing is a national past time in Islamoland.

Like "Jihad Joe™

288 jcm  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:04:19am

re: #251 Joel

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

I think she was doing a parody.

Sock puppet with a bad sense of timing.

289 MrMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:04:27am

re: #261 hillary clinton

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

Anybody seen Mandy?
/SOCKPUPPET?

290 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:05:32am

re: #285 unrealizedviewpoint

Come to think of it, Hill is kinda funny in a dry, high-droll kinda way.

I really feel like a fool for reacting as I did.

291 Rodan[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:07:17am
292 gymnast  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:08:44am

re: #284 Athos

Mark Steyn comments on his former neighbor...

Benazir Bhutto's return to Pakistan had a mad recklessness about it which give today's events a horrible inevitability. As I always say when I'm asked about her, she was my next-door neighbor for a while - which affects a kind of intimacy, though in fact I knew her only for sidewalk pleasantries. She was beautiful and charming and sophisticated and smart and modern, and everything we in the west would like a Muslim leader to be - though in practice, as Pakistan's Prime Minister, she was just another grubby wardheeler from one of the world's most corrupt political classes.

Since her last spell in power, Pakistan has changed, profoundly. Its sovereignty is meaningless in increasingly significant chunks of its territory, and, within the portions Musharraf is just about holding together, to an ever more radicalized generation of young Muslim men Miss Bhutto was entirely unacceptable as the leader of their nation.


There's more.

Mark Steyn nails it. Thanks for bringing his veiw it to our attention.

293 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:08:48am
re: #273 Winmag
This is why I like Rudy. He isn't perfect, or even great, but I do think he is the best to deal with the Islamics ts. I think Rudy would pull the trigger when he needs to. I don't care what the next president thinks about gays or abortion

.

He may be the only prepared to deal with.
It is his calling.
There is no other candidate IMO.

294 Kevin Shook  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:09:02am

Pakistan will be in the hands of the Islamists by the end of 2008. This whole "crisis" in Pakistan has been the result of Bush's and Rice's pointless policy of Democratization in Pakistan this year. This has done nothing but drain resources and attention from destroying Al Qaeda. Pakistan will become the new Islamist paradise and Afghanistan will be lost. Thank you George and Condi.

295 Nevergiveup  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:09:08am

Hilliary is already spinning this to fit her philosophy. She said Bhutto's father was assassinated. Well he was hung for corruption. Whether it was warranted or not is not the point. He was NOT assassinated.

296 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:10:51am

Romney certainly loves to churn out the verbiage.

I think that is what a Romney Admin will be like.

Lots of verbiage.

I believe he woulg go with the State Dept flow, at the end of the day.

I know a lot of people here have issues with Rudy on gun control and abortion.

The man has already said he wouldn't ram his personal beliefs down anybodies throat.

I ask that you put your issues with him aside, and concentrate on the the important foreign policy areas where he is likely to take the right moves -more so than any other candidate.

297 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:11:16am

re: #108 Maine's Michael

'Bad news from Pakistan.'

Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.

I hope Giuliani gets elected President. I hope he appoints Rice as an important go to official.

Go to Rice. Ask her opinion. DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

Usually idiot savants are objects of cute curiosity. Our idiot savant is a curious danger to our well being. She is f**ken ALWAYS wrong.

298 uptight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:11:17am

re: #282 CourDeLion

Who killed Benazir Bhutto? The main suspects

The main suspects in Benazir Bhutto’s assassination are the Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge and had repeatedly threatened to kill her.

But fingers will also be pointed at Inter-Services Intelligence, the agency that has had close ties to the Islamists since the 1970s and has been used by successive Pakistani leaders to suppress political opposition.

No intelligence officer would suicide bomb. It hurts their careers.

Maybe they had a hand, but Al Qaeda have claimed responsibility for it now, so there you go.

I suppose it's too much to hope that Pakistanis will now over-run waziristan after the Jihadists?

299 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:11:29am

re: #3 The Other Les

Well I'm not going to blame Hillary for this.

No, not Hitlary. The Jackass to blame for all of this, just as with anything esle going on in the Middle East is Jimmy Carter.

Someone needs to go over and kick him square in the pee-nutts.

300 Owl  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:11:57am

re: #255 Nevergiveup

maybe. ironically, too late though.

301 Owl  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:13:06am

re: #296 Maine's Michael

Romney certainly loves to churn out the verbiage.

I think that is what a Romney Admin will be like.

Lots of verbiage.

I believe he woulg go with the State Dept flow, at the end of the day.

I know a lot of people here have issues with Rudy on gun control and abortion.

The man has already said he wouldn't ram his personal beliefs down anybodies throat.

I ask that you put your issues with him aside, and concentrate on the the important foreign policy areas where he is likely to take the right moves -more so than any other candidate.

And I respectfully ask people to vote for Fred Thompson- because he is actually a conservative.

302 WriterMom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:13:09am

Pakistan is one of the epicentres of shit-hole Jihad and I just can't get worked up about this latest attrocity. I'm just waiting for them to start blaming the Mossad for the assasination. This is not a suprise.

303 richb313  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:13:36am

The biggest worry is a destabilized Pakistan starting a war with India, who by the way is also a nuclear power. The entire region could be up in flames very quickly. I am sure the alerts in India have already gone out.

There is a theory being spouted by the Pakistanis that General Musahriff was behind this, I DON'T THINK SO, but it is the exact kind of mis-information that would be spread by the conspirators.

As to the action the US should take? Pay close attention to the news, if Pakistan even remotely degrades into civil war I'd be willing to bet money that an effort to secure the nukes will have to be made. Can you imagine if any of the Democratic candidates were the Commander in Chief at this critical time?

304 bullrat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:14:45am

re: #261 hillary clinton

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

Is it true you're selling the trademark "It takes a village" to islamists? I heard they want to use it in their shahid campaigns, as they'd like to murder more innocent people at one time. They think it's taking too long to murder everyone on the earth with just a dozen or two here, and a dozen or two there.

I swear, I'm beginning to think that if there were only two muslims left on the earth, they'd still try to kill each other over some difference of opinion.

305 CLLRusso  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:14:46am

re: #295 Nevergiveup

Oh good! I was just switching over to say exactly that. Two brothers died as well, but I don't know how. My God, what her children and brothers children must be going through. Even if they may be grown, to have the leaders of the family die like this must be so bitter.

306 rawmuse  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:15:47am

If Democrats are in charge when this crisis escalates, then the only dilemma to them will be to whom to surrender, and in what order.

307 tarkus  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:16:58am

re: #284 Athos

incisive

308 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:17:00am

re: #301 Owl

I respectfully ask people to vote for Giuliani. Because he proved he has - what the next President desperately needs- balls of steel for a politician.

309 cpuller  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:17:08am

re: #303 richb313

The biggest worry is a destabilized Pakistan starting a war with India, who by the way is also a nuclear power. The entire region could be up in flames very quickly. I am sure the alerts in India have already gone out.

There is a theory being spouted by the Pakistanis that General Musahriff was behind this, I DON'T THINK SO, but it is the exact kind of mis-information that would be spread by the conspirators.

As to the action the US should take? Pay close attention to the news, if Pakistan even remotely degrades into civil war I'd be willing to bet money that an effort to secure the nukes will have to be made. Can you imagine if any of the Democratic candidates were the Commander in Chief at this critical time?

If that happens, oil goes up drastically and the stock market takes a huge hit.

Then it is only a matter of how bad.

310 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:17:17am

re: #297 Opinionated

No argument there.

311 CourDeLion[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:17:54am
312 Malleus Dei  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:18:36am

re: #306 rawmuse

If Democrats are in charge when this crisis escalates, then the only dilemma to them will be to whom to surrender, and in what order.

I wish that wasn't true. But it is.

313 fo0hzy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:18:54am

Bad mojo...

314 MacBoy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:19:03am

Another contribution to humanity from the RoP. The world is not safe from the darkness that emanates from this dysfunctional, failed state. Repeat after me: 'there is no compulsion in Religion...'

Ban Muslim Immigration.

315 lambdaarrow  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:19:06am

Pakistan is our enemy. The Pakistanis are our enemies. In a rational world we would destroy them. In an irrational world we would send them aid. We send them aid. And we will not destroy them even if they nuke us. That's hopelessness speaking. Enjoy.

316 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:20:26am

re: #303 richb313

The biggest worry is a destabilized Pakistan starting a war with India, who by the way is also a nuclear power. The entire region could be up in flames very quickly. I am sure the alerts in India have already gone out.

There is a theory being spouted by the Pakistanis that General Musahriff was behind this, I DON'T THINK SO, but it is the exact kind of mis-information that would be spread by the conspirators.

As to the action the US should take? Pay close attention to the news, if Pakistan even remotely degrades into civil war I'd be willing to bet money that an effort to secure the nukes will have to be made. Can you imagine if any of the Democratic candidates were the Commander in Chief at this critical time?

Well, I don't know. Obama says he'll go in.
/

Actually, he said we'd be there already. dunce!

317 J.S.  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:20:46am

CNN keeps suggesting that Bhutto may have died from shrapnel from the suicide bomb blast -- I really don't think so, given the amateur videos. Again, the rear window of the vehicle is shown to have been rolled down -- no signs of broken glass -- but the window is open (all the other windows were closed). It was an armoured plated vehicle. The only way to get a shot at Bhutto (neck, face, chest) would be if someone rolled down the window shortly beforehand. (which then leads to suspicions about who was inside that vehicle and had access to the window controls.)

318 crusader1145  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:21:30am

This is a sad day for Pakistan. Its another indication that Pakistan is sliding closer to an Islamic state. An Islamic state with Nuclear weapons that has a long standing feud with its nuclear armed Hindu neighbor and close ties to Al Qaeda. If the Islamists succeed in taking over, things will go downhill quickly.

Its unfortunate that Bhutto was murdered and I don't mean to appear unsympathetic, but I doubt that she would have been able to stop the descent into Islamism. She was an imperious, cynical and corrupt woman that believed it was her destiny to rule Pakistan. Rather than find a way out of the crisis facing her country she would have further polarized Pakistani society and probably hastened a violent takeover by the radicals. A takeover that appears even closer now.

319 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:22:25am
320 LeftJustAintRight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:22:45am

The Islamicnuts with a nuke...
The only outcome will be India and Israel will become the the best of friends.
Those stupid Islamicnuts could not even wait till the dems primary was over,now they will have to respond about the events and try to blame Bush.
Not one will condemn the Isamicnuts action and will call it a civil war or even call them freedom fighters.

321 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:22:49am

re: #315 lambdaarrow

Have hope lamdaarrow. There are many brave Pakistanis fighting for liberty.

322 Eyes of Blue  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:22:52am

This from yesterday.
[Link: www.dawn.com...]

323 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:22:58am

re: #86 Thanos

I see.

Fiction books and movies have nothing on real life...

324 Tenacious  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:23:41am

This assassination (muslim/arabic word, by the way--go figure) might give Musharraf what he needs to drop the hammer.

Though he benefits from Bhutto's death in a way, maybe he can now really go after al quaeda in the western part of his country, near the Afghan border. He's done very little there, but now he can do so to appease Bhutto supporters and avenge her death? Just a thought.

325 headlesschickens  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:24:31am

Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.

326 bullrat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:24:54am

We shouldn't coddle some terrorists while fighting others. A terrorist is a terrorist. We should have roasted Arafat's chestnuts over an open fire -- and every other terrorist who dares show his/her face in public. Make these bastards live underground forever and kill every one that shows their malignant face no matter where they are found. And we in America have the audacity to try to force Israel to have a separate state for these murderous vermin. Death to all terrorists!

327 badtemper  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:25:36am

Tragic in more ways than one.

Not exactly surprised that many of the crazies are hitting the streets calling for more bloodshed.

What happens now?

328 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:26:14am

re: #317 J.S.

CNN keeps suggesting that Bhutto may have died from shrapnel from the suicide bomb blast -- I really don't think so, given the amateur videos. Again, the rear window of the vehicle is shown to have been rolled down -- no signs of broken glass -- but the window is open (all the other windows were closed). It was an armoured plated vehicle. The only way to get a shot at Bhutto (neck, face, chest) would be if someone rolled down the window shortly beforehand. (which then leads to suspicions about who was inside that vehicle and had access to the window controls.)

Ya mean kinda like the dead tiger in Frisco?

329 astronmr20  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:27:15am

Remember;

World War 1 started with an assassination.

330 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:27:44am

re: #325 headlesschickens

Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.


I suppose with registration opening so often lately, we're bound to suck in a moonbat or two.

331 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:28:05am

re: #294 Kevin Shook

Pakistan will be in the hands of the Islamists by the end of 2008. This whole "crisis" in Pakistan has been the result of Bush's and Rice's pointless policy of Democratization in Pakistan this year. This has done nothing but drain resources and attention from destroying Al Qaeda. Pakistan will become the new Islamist paradise and Afghanistan will be lost. Thank you George and Condi.

That's pure horse crap. If anything we should be blaming the Leftists over at the State Dept. for dragging their feet and not doing their job.

Jimmy Carter caused this whole mess going back to Iran. Since then America has pretty much ignored Pakistan till they started testing nukes and Musharraf took over.

We didn't cause the Talibani- Afghani problem in Afghanistan, the Soviets did, back when they invaded Afghanistan, and the crazies left and set up shop over in Pakistan, where they mixed in with the crazies there. Thing is, they never left save to go wage war in the Soviets and then any attempt for a civil government in Afghanistan.

332 richb313  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:28:14am

You have to wonder who has the most to gain from this terrible act. I doubt that General Mushariff could gain anything by this. If however he could have embarrassed her or proved she was up to her eyeballs in corruption he would have been a winner. The only one with a clear advantage would be a group that wished to de-stabilize the region. It has all the text book earmarks of the Muslim extremists. I really doubt we will ever learn the truth with any degree of certainty.

And yes if the region erupted into violence that spilled over into India this would also disrupt the worlds oil supplies. The Indian Ocean would become very unsafe, and fully loaded supertankers from the Persian Gulf have to transit this ocean as the Suez Canal is not deep enough.

333 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:28:47am

Dear Mahmoud Abbas,

You might be concerned today but remember that George and I have your back. We will give you $Billions and force Israel into suicidal concessions on their security and hope it doesn't all fall apart when the "radicals" blow your head off.

XOXO

Condi.

334 LeftJustAintRight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:29:21am

re: #329 astronmr20

World War 1 started with an assassination.


Are they going to say it all started when the US assassinated Sddam?

335 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:30:11am

Events like this always cause cognitive dissonance for moonbats.

I just spent the past 20 minutes wading through the Bhutto threads at a few of the top Lefty blogs and most all of the moonbats agree that Bhutto's assassination is clearly the fault of Bush. Of course some of them say it's Bush's fault for forcing Democracy on the world while others are saying that this is all Bush's fault because he supports dictators, like Musharaf. It seems to be no matter that these two theories conflict with each other. Most of the comments seem pretty certain that Musharaf was behind the assassination but a few think it was the US who killed her as an excuse to ratchet up the war on "terror".

It doesn't really matter what the truth is to these crackpots so long as it can be used to bash Bush and the US.

336 lambdaarrow  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:30:23am

Musharraf could have gone after the islamic militants when he declared Marshall law. If he had done that, I would defend him now. I only heard that he went after members of the opposition party. Yes the islamic militants want to kill him, but they want to kill everyone. Screw Musharraf.

I hope Musharraf does something to upset Putin, if you know what I mean.

337 Maximu§  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:30:33am

This may be the end of Pakistan as we know it...A brutal (3) way civil war will break out and its too complicated to say who will win.

Sub-Factions are buried in other factions and calling the situation "complex" is an understatement. I know this much, America needs to strike Pakistans nuclear arsenal before it falls into the wrong hands.

Let them have their civil war, but take away the big guns.

Maximu§
3/11 ACR

338 Caton  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:30:44am

re: #331 Dotcoman

If anything we should be blaming the Leftists over at the State Dept. for dragging their feet and not doing their job.

Where, exactly, does the buck stop nowadays?

339 CLLRusso  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:30:56am

re: #308 Opinionated

re: #301 Owl

I respectfully ask people to vote for Giuliani. Because he proved he has - what the next President desperately needs- balls of steel for a politician.

Only he also has this deplorable lack of personal integrity. I personally will only vote for him if he is the Republican presidential candidate in Nov because I believe fighting illegal immigration and the having a really tall fence are important too.

340 LeftJustAintRight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:31:01am

PIMF
Saddam

341 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:31:33am

re: #330 LANMaster

re: #325 headlesschickens

Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.


I suppose with registration opening so often lately, we're bound to suck in a moonbat or two.


So George's handling has been effective?

342 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:32:01am

re: #308 Opinionated

re: #301 Owl

I respectfully ask people to vote for Giuliani. Because he proved he has - what the next President desperately needs- balls of steel for a politician.

Hitlary has balls in steel too. Just that all the sets of balls she's collected over the years are kept in a steel "lock box".

343 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:34:02am

re: #228 Thanos

If we're in the foothill's of wwiii then we can't argue or bicker any longer about the past. We need cold realist thinking. A President who will define clear terms of engagement, and a public in line with the true reality of our situation. To get this public alignment we need a President who can level with the people, and by doing so, undue the muttled madness spawned by the liberal political/ media conglomerate.

344 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:35:04am

re: #331 Dotcoman

It's not Leftists. It's not Carter. It's the idiocy of Bush and Rice who can't appreciate Islamic reality no matter the proof.

...

Last month, Rice persuaded Musharraf to let exiled former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto back in the country—and persuaded Bhutto to go back—as part of a power-sharing deal. The idea was that Musharraf, who doubles as army chief of staff, would retain control of the military in the fight against terrorism, while Bhutto would attract the loyalty of Pakistan's increasingly discontented democrats. That ploy, too, turned out to be illusory: Bhutto was attacked the moment she got back; Musharraf showed no interest in sharing power.

Musharraf is portraying his suspension of the constitution as a necessary step to stabilize Pakistan and fend off Islamist terrorists. Yet the timing suggests it was, for the most part, a power grab. Pakistan's Supreme Court was about to rule that Musharraf's reign as both president and army chief of staff was unconstitutional. That meant the coming elections (which may or may not now be called off) would have ended his reign. And so he dissolved the court. He also arrested many democratic activists and shut down the nation's independent media.

It should now be clear, if it wasn't already, that Musharraf has been diddling Bush & Co. the past three years or longer.

In exchange for his promises to root out Taliban terrorists on the Afghan border and within Pakistan's own intelligence service, Bush has supplied Musharraf with at least $10 billion in aid. Yet while Musharraf has rendered considerable assistance in the war on terrorism, the Taliban—and possibly Osama Bin Laden himself—retain their sanctuary in Pakistan's northwest territories.

In exchange for Musharraf's promises to be a good democrat someday, Bush has declared Pakistan to be a "major non-NATO ally." Yet, with his strategically timed state of emergency, Musharraf has revealed he's not at all interested in democratic transitions.

[Link: www.slate.com...]

It may be Slate but facts are facts.

345 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:35:18am

re: #341 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #330 LANMaster


re: #325 headlesschickens

Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.

I suppose with registration opening so often lately, we're bound to suck in a moonbat or two.

So George's handling has been effective?

ROLLEYES:

Bush "handles" Pakistani affairs?

346 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:35:20am

re: #332 richb313


You have to wonder who has the most to gain from this terrible act.

Uh, we do, actually.

This is Dubya's and Condi's plan, blowing up.

We all benefit, over the medium term.

347 arctic medic  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:35:39am

I'm not suprised this happened.

348 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:36:13am

Oh ... and Bush is responsible for the perversion of Islam as well.

Stupid Liberals!

349 scaramouche  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:36:24am

This is where "Charlie Wilson's War" has brought us--to empowered Islamists, Banazir Bhutto lying dead on a slab, and a nuclear Pakistan where, sooner rather than later, the religious zanies are going to get their hands on a nuke.

But I guess as long as that "democracy project" is still a go (if only in George W. Bush's wishful-thinking mind) all will turn out for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
/

350 Maximu§  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:37:05am

re: #338 Caton

re: #331 Dotcoman


If anything we should be blaming the Leftists over at the State Dept. for dragging their feet and not doing their job.

Where, exactly, does the buck stop nowadays?

Thats a good question. When I saw the TV special about that POS Pakistani nuclear scientist running around the world in the mid-90s helping our enemies develop nuclear weapons...I wondered what the NSA and CIA were doing?

Assassination was the 1st word to come to my mind when I saw what this Pakistani A**hole was doing, but I guess that would have ruffled some feather at the State Department.

Maximu§
3/11 ACR

351 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:37:12am

re: #329 astronmr20

Remember;

World War 1 started with an assassination.

This war's been on since 1979. This is just another attack - another political strategy to disrupt Musharraf, democracy, and get the left in the US fixated on more retreats. Steyn did nail it (see my #284).

Bhutto was no saint, and she was trying to protect herself by trying to ally with the jihadi's - but there was an inevitability since there is a rising radical tide in Pakistan that would not accept her as PM. These same jihadi's made half a dozen attempts at Musharraf as well. I would not be surprised if the some in the ISI made it easier for the jihadis to have access for this attack - just as they are quick to point the blame to Musharraf.

352 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:37:24am

re: #280 mean Gene

She's an idiot in womens clothing

353 LeftJustAintRight  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:37:43am

Bush Condemns Bhutto Assassination

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush demanded Thursday that those responsible for killing former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir be brought to justice.


"Those who committed this crime must be brought to justice."
So now terrorism is a crime?
Bush Responds

354 Tigger2005  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:38:04am

Aahhh, but you're just thinking of the primary wife, not of secondary wives and mistresses. In manpanzee societies the alpha male may keep a not-so-hot wife for appearances' sake or because he values her for something besides her looks (although I doubt men avail themselves much of women's wisdom in Islamic manpanzee societies).

re: #247 Maine's Michael

re: #232 Tigger2005


He gets the pick of the chicks, too.

Saddam really was a dumbass then. ever seen his wife?

Assad ain't doing too bad, tho, ditto the midget king of Jordan.

355 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:38:17am

re: #347 arctic medic

Though there's precious little to smile about in this, your comment did bring a small smile --yours is so much the understatement of the century!

356 hillary clinton  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:38:27am

re: #271 Gang of One

re: #258 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

Sarcasm tag only required for imbeciles I guess.

Yeah. I am an imbecile. Having a bad day, unrelated to all this.

Please accept my apologies, Hill.

With an attitude like that I'm going to put you in my cabinet.

357 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:40:26am

While I mourn Ms. Bhutto, let us remember and praise the courage of countless brave Iraqi first-time politicians--without Bhutto's privileged Western upbringing in England--who have suffered her fate at the hands of Al Qaeda, despite our troops' presence in Iraq.

Iraqis have been martyred left and right for trying on democracy against Al Qaeda's wishes.

Let us remember the courage of all waging this war against jihadists in their midst.

358 Just_A_Grunt  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:41:23am

Well comments and condolences are starting to come in from around the world, well certain parts of the world. Can you pick which region is missing in this AP article?

359 Purple Fury  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:41:27am

re: #261 hillary clinton

Well I'm off to Pakistan to correct the situation.

Everyone remain calm.

Hillary!'s on the job.

360 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:41:48am

re: #357 alegrias

Amen.

361 selpaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:42:37am

re: #333 Opinionated

Amen friend.

der1145

This is a sad day for Pakistan. Its another indication that Pakistan is sliding closer to an Islamic state.

Sliding closer? Pakistan is an Islamic terrorist state!

re: #151 Maine's Michael

You bet! Having said that the spin of the spin is spinning out of control.

So here we are:

Bhutto assassinated.

Just like that. Now let's move on quickly/
No hard and fast questions asked...nothing.


Pakistan like Egypt, like Saudi Arabia...allies in
the war on terror so I have been told. Palestinians want to live side by side in peace with Israel. Only a few wish to hijack peace. Islam, the religion of peace.

Oh, I could go on and on but it would only embarrasses the defunct Bush doctrine which fizzled fast which I am now committed to say was all a smoke screen to begin with.

How many more lies will be told to uphold the cruelest most vile blood thirsty creatures on the planet? (creatures...not the four legged type)

As for the MSM, fox is doing a grand job trying to gloss over Mooosharaf's ugly part in this whole stinking mess. The pendulum swings both ways. We need to take a hard look and force ourselves to answer important questions. If we continue diverting our attentions the lies will consume us all.

...which I fear they already have.

362 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:42:46am

re: #339 CLLRusso

Bullshit.

Where has that Liberal generated myth- picked up by radical SoCons- of his lack of personal integrity ever been proved? With the exception of his marital issues.

He strayed on his less then angelic wife. I don't give a rat's ass.

I care about his extraordinary competency. About his miraculous positive results. About his leadership traits. that he recognises the danger. That he would protect this nation and our allies.

363 arctic medic  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:42:59am

re: #355 Ma Sands

I excel at understatements.

364 Different Drummer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:43:39am

When the jihadis get and use nuclear weapons against those they call infidels and apostates, this world will see carnage unlike it has seen since World War II, or perhaps much worse.

I wonder how many millions will have to suffer and die before the avoidance and denial in the West will stop.

365 WitchDoctor  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:43:39am

re: #335 Ringo the Gringo

Which is funny because some lizards do the same thing.

* He wasn't tough enough.
* He shouldn't have tried to bring democracy.

And my all time favourite:
People are too stupid for democracy

I guess we can feel snuggly in our superiority now and just rule benevolently from the tower.

366 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:43:53am

re: #363 arctic medic

:)

367 nyc redneck  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:44:14am

how much better example do we need to stop iran from getting nukes?

368 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:45:01am

Amazing. Forseeable. It seems to me that Musharaff tried to protect her and she insisted on doing these very public things. What are you going to do when you try to combine democracy and speeches to the public with a population with what percentage of suicidal assassins. Suicidal assassins are very ahrd to stop and if you have dozens of them and you manage to stop say 10 all it takes is for one to get through. Just the other day they found a child assassin at the second stop point.

369 jimsaco  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:45:20am

Who had the most to gain from her death?

I understand they took a shot at Sharif too... who had the most to gain from having 2 opposition leaders taken out?

Exactly what assistance has Musharraf provided in the WoT that has been worth the billions in cash money he gets in "foreign aid"?

370 SaneInMN  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:45:31am

Unfortunately, I agree with Mark Steyn...

From The Corner at [Link: www.nationalreview.com...]

By the way, I would like to believe that JPod is right about Benazir's murder marking the end of Campaign '08's Holiday from History. But my sense is that the entire Democratic primary base and a good chunk of the GOP's is in the mood for a post-"war on terror" election, and that one more dead distant foreigner will not shake them from that.

371 mike_trivisonno  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:46:24am

Islam is violent and ensconces human sacrifice in a thick soup of contradictory language. Totally alien to the more-enlightened rational culture we enjoy in the West. To savage the Islam and defeat it, we need to simplify the problem. One of the first things we have to do is strip away all the fake words like islamist, terrorists, islamofacists, and whatnot.

The threat is simple:
Islam and Muslims

The solution is equally simple:
Do not recognize Islam as a religion.
Do not recognize muslims as citizens.

Some day, more people will accept these two simple rules and we will finally be able to defend ourselves.

372 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:47:07am

Giuliani made a statement. He gets it.

373 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:47:42am

Another dangerous crack in the fault line that goes from Gaza to India.

I wouldn't be so worried if we had someone at the helm...

374 coquimbojoe  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:49:12am

Just joining this discussion late. I am so pissed off about this. Who won't they kill? I know its a rhetorical question, but the next time someone snuggles up to the Islamists, they need to ask that question.

375 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:49:26am

re: #365 WitchDoctor

Hey witchdoctor, there are a few posts of mine on this thread you haven't dinged yet.

Knock yourself out!

376 selpaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:50:59am

re: #338 Caton

Where, exactly, does the buck stop nowadays?

Not where it needs to, that's for sure. Yet everywhere there needs to be a diversion is where the buck always stops. Most are quite happy with this convoluted arrangement.


re: #353 LeftJustAintRight


So now terrorism is a crime?

ONLY IN MERE WORDS; toothless mere words indeed. Take Syria for instance...what consequences have befallen them? Syria is the best example of getting away with terror then of course egypt, the saudi's and of course the Palestinians. Soon we will be holding hands with Iran while everyone predicted this was only going to happen on the left. Jimmy Carter aka BAker BUNCH lives in GWB.

377 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:51:26am

re: #369 jimsaco

Did you forget assistance during the invasion of Afghanistan - supply and overflight rights?
How about the capture of a number of AQ senior members including KSM?
He's been a target of at least half a dozen assassination attempts by the Jihadi's.

But, I suppose, since he isn't willing to precipitate a full national civil war by ordering a massive invasion of Waziristan to clean out the tribal regions - killing tens or hundreds of thousands - he's the problem? These events are what happen in a real world - not a theoretical world - where some leaders have to walk a tightrope in order to balance the oil and water elements of the jihadi mindset and any other mindset.

378 sneaky[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:53:42am
379 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:53:43am

re: #338 Caton

re: #331 Dotcoman

If anything we should be blaming the Leftists over at the State Dept. for dragging their feet and not doing their job.

Where, exactly, does the buck stop nowadays?

Well for starters the State Dept and the CIA for that matter, are filled to the birm with Clintonistas and other America hating Socialists, and no one has dared to attempt to remove any of them. They are even afraid to order them to serve in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Both agencies are on record as hating Bush and doing everything they can to screw over the Bush Admin., and have not been above stabbing Collin Powell and Condi in the back.

John Bolton is quoted in a article over at Newsmax detailing the Left's latest treason over at the State Dept.
I guess you could start there.

I'd blame Powell and Rice for not firing the entire State Dept staff from anyone directly outside their office on down to the janitors and starting over with people who are at least pro American.

380 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:53:54am

re: #346 Maine's Michael

re: #332 richb313

You have to wonder who has the most to gain from this terrible act.
Uh, we do, actually.

This is Dubya's and Condi's plan, blowing up.

We all benefit, over the medium term.

Actually, Nawaz Sharif's party, the PML-N, is the big weaner.

Yeow Baby, Mush heads to his retirement villa in Imouttaherestan, his General Staff can barely stand us(the US) because we've given them faulty intel and Bhutto, the - pro-US - weak cultural Maxist is out-of-the-way. What more could Islamists ask for, huh?

Hey! Let's hold democratic elections!

What a friggin farce.

381 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:54:02am

re: #373 Poitiers-Lepanto

Another dangerous crack in the fault line that goes from Gaza to India.

I wouldn't be so worried if we had someone at the helm...

I agree - at this point there really isn't anyone at the helm. But then, the wrong person would be worse than no one.

382 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:54:54am

re: #18 JamesTKirk

So let India. Why do we have to stop people who have an interest who are sensible and are interested in surviving? We don't have to put American boys into the firing line. We don't have enough to be shot at by all the nations where Islamists raise their heads. What's next? Send American boys to France if they can't hold down their problem. How about trying to support Pakistan and stability but otherwise getting out of the way. What do we want? Another Lebanese war with Condi giving directions to India? Advance. Turn right. No turn left. No stop. No retreat. Call a truce. No the truce is off.

383 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:55:27am

Obama just made a stupid statement.

384 winston06  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:55:30am

R.I.P Bhutto

385 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:55:31am

re: #369 jimsaco

Who had the most to gain from her death?

I understand they took a shot at Sharif too... who had the most to gain from having 2 opposition leaders taken out?

Exactly what assistance has Musharraf provided in the WoT that has been worth the billions in cash money he gets in "foreign aid"?


* * *
Al Qaeda has taken "responsibility".
Musharraf ain't perfect, granted, but we've captured many top AlQaedans in his country, with his permission. Including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, 9/11 mastermind who spilled many beans after being waterboarded 30 seconds.

386 descolada9  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:55:51am

Very sad occurrence and coming right after Christmas. What is it with Southeast Asia and near-Christmas disasters? Sadly, Pakistan is probably going to explode now and Musharref is either going to have to let it all burn or else start killing Islamists like it's going out of style.

You know, there was a reason why Musharref had put Bhutto under house arrest, it was for her own safety. I sure wish Bush and Condi would have kept their mouths shut instead of insisting that she be let out.

387 itellu3times  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:55:57am

re: #372 GreenSoccer

Giuliani made a statement. He gets it.

[Link: corner.nationalreview.com...]
New York City – Mayor Rudy Giuliani released the following statement on the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto:

“The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is a tragic event for Pakistan and for democracy in Pakistan. Her murderers must be brought to justice and Pakistan must continue the path back to democracy and the rule of law. Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere — whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi — is an enemy of freedom. We must redouble our efforts to win the Terrorists’ War on Us.”

388 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:56:09am

re: #371 mike_trivisonno

The threat is simple:
Islam and Muslims

The solution is equally simple:
Do not recognize Islam as a religion.
Do not recognize muslims as citizens.

Sounds to me like you're pretty simple too.

389 selpaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:56:32am

re: #380 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

Hey! Let's hold democratic elections!

What a friggin farce.

you BET! See #361

390 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:56:53am

re: #381 Athos

I agree - at this point there really isn't anyone at the helm. But then, the wrong person would be worse than no one.

Isn't James Baker in charge?

The sauds are happy today.

391 Poitiers-Lepanto  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:56:54am

re: #381 Athos

re: #373 Poitiers-Lepanto

Another dangerous crack in the fault line that goes from Gaza to India.

I wouldn't be so worried if we had someone at the helm...

I agree - at this point there really isn't anyone at the helm. But then, the wrong person would be worse than no one.

Despite all the disillusions...I still agree with that, since we know that people like Gore and Hillary would do anything they can to explode ANY can of worms in America's face...

392 sparrowlake  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:56:59am

re: #302 WriterMom
You are of course right abount Pakistan being an Islamoterrorist haven. And for that matter Benazir Bhutto herself had a long track record of corruption and was never a friend of the U.S. or Israel, so she is no big loss.
But the scary thing is that the Paki dung-heap may be stirred up enough by the Bhutto assassination to generate a series of events which could see the government collapse and Paki nukes fall into the hands of the Islamofascists and which could then threaten to set off a Regional war involving India and others.

393 Pickle  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:57:14am

Charles, could Bhutto be added to the list of Fallaci nominees? I reckon she deserves it.

394 CLLRusso  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:57:27am

re: #362 Opinionated

I do "give a rat's ass". There is more to consider in a president than a finger on the trigger.

It was great that he threw the Saudi's money back in their faces, and if he will continue to do that and rid us of Saudi influence in our government, universities, and American mosques, great.

I hope if it comes to it Rudy will not be a disappointment. The potential there is huge because of his lack of personal integrity. To many men think with their penis.

395 grumpy old codger  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:57:27am

re: #358 Just_A_Grunt
Alre: #363 arctic medic
Just
l of the moslem world. Also S. America and Africa, but the silence from the moslem world is deafening. Will the Palis celebrate?

Artic
Is that an understatment?

396 headlesschickens  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 8:57:57am

re: #330 LANMaster

Somebody is not recognizing sarcasm.

397 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:00:20am

"Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere -- whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi -- is an enemy of freedom," said Giuliani. "We must redouble our efforts to win the Terrorists' War on Us."

Not BS words about Democracy. Just the simple truth. It's a war. We must win.

398 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:00:36am

re: #344 Opinionated

re: #331 Dotcoman

It's not Leftists. It's not Carter. It's the idiocy of Bush and Rice who can't appreciate Islamic reality no matter the proof.

... ...

Last month, Rice persuaded Musharraf to let exiled former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto back in the country—and persuaded Bhutto to go back—as part of a power-sharing deal. The idea was that Musharraf, who doubles as army chief of staff, would retain control of the military in the fight against terrorism, while Bhutto would attract the loyalty of Pakistan's increasingly discontented democrats. That ploy, too, turned out to be illusory: Bhutto was attacked the moment she got back; Musharraf showed no interest in sharing power.

Musharraf is portraying his suspension of the constitution as a necessary step to stabilize Pakistan and fend off Islamist terrorists. Yet the timing suggests it was, for the most part, a power grab. Pakistan's Supreme Court was about to rule that Musharraf's reign as both president and army chief of staff was unconstitutional. That meant the coming elections (which may or may not now be called off) would have ended his reign. And so he dissolved the court. He also arrested many democratic activists and shut down the nation's independent media.

It should now be clear, if it wasn't already, that Musharraf has been diddling Bush & Co. the past three years or longer.

In exchange for his promises to root out Taliban terrorists on the Afghan border and within Pakistan's own intelligence service, Bush has supplied Musharraf with at least $10 billion in aid. Yet while Musharraf has rendered considerable assistance in the war on terrorism, the Taliban—and possibly Osama Bin Laden himself—retain their sanctuary in Pakistan's northwest territories.

In exchange for Musharraf's promises to be a good democrat someday, Bush has declared Pakistan to be a "major non-NATO ally." Yet, with his strategically timed state of emergency, Musharraf has revealed he's not at all interested in democratic transitions.

[Link: www.slate.com...]

It may be Slate but facts are facts.

It most certainly as hell was Jimmy Carter that started all of this.

And it's the Fucking America hating Leftist Clintonista Internationalist lifers over at the State Dept that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice, and not following orders prefering to screw Bush and the rest of the world to suit their own aggenda.

Butto has had a history of corruption that rivals the Clinton's

So I guess, your solution is that Bush should have done nothing in Pakistan, just as Clinton did?

399 FlyingTigress  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:00:39am

re: #369 jimsaco

Who had the most to gain from her death?

BushitlerchimpymcHalliburton

/DU-DK-HuffPo

400 Catttt  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:00:42am

Dammit.

401 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:01:12am

re: #354 Tigger2005

Aahhh, but you're just thinking of the primary wife, not of secondary wives and mistresses. In manpanzee societies the alpha male may keep a not-so-hot wife for appearances' sake or because he values her for something besides her looks (although I doubt men avail themselves much of women's wisdom in Islamic manpanzee societies).

re: #247 Maine's Michael


re: #232 Tigger2005

He gets the pick of the chicks, too.

Saddam really was a dumbass then. ever seen his wife?
Assad ain't doing too bad, tho, ditto the midget king of Jordan.

Yeah, But she sshurr can cook.

402 gadlaw  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:01:42am

The only surprise here is that it took so long for her to be successfully assassinated. I've got CNN on and they are acting like it's some sort of surprise. And they are waiting with expectation like a kid before Christmas for the 'next shoe to drop' - and talking about how this could impact Pakistan stability. Yeah, it'll help it. One less person stirring up the pot, Mushariff will have one less person with some power who was pressuring him. Seems like a bunch of the same old same old. The amazing thing is that she thought that she would not be killed if she went back, even I knew she was dead woman walking there in crazy land.

403 gagalbert  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:02:00am

re: #207 Nevergiveup

Excellent comments!

404 arctic medic  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:02:31am

re: #395 grumpy old codger

Yes

405 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:03:14am

re: #397 Opinionated

Romney on the other hand- JUST LIKE BUSH- is looking for those moderate Islamics.

""For those who think Iraq is the sole front in the War on Terror, one must look no further than what has happened today. America must show its commitment to stand with all moderate forces across the Islamic world and together face the defining challenge of our generation - the struggle against violent, radical jihadists.""

406 sneaky  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:03:28am

I made a comment stating that Islam (an ideology) must be irradicated. The comment was deleted.

If I'd said that Nazism or paedophilia should be irradicated, would that have been deleted?

Since Islam states that all Christians and Jews must be kept in a "subdued" state and that everyone else must be enslaved or killed, how can it be wrong to call for its irradication?

I refuse to believe that LGF has gone PC.

407 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:04:15am

re: #400 Cattt

Succinct.


:)

408 itellu3times  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:04:27am

Wot a mess. It's not like Bhutto was likely going to be much of a leader even if she managed to be elected, but you have to hand it to her, she showed up and tried to work the democratic system - such as it might exist in Pakistan. Given her history, should she have stayed gone? Or at least, could the US state department have encouraged her less? Did Musharraf do it? Could he have done more to prevent it? Should he have done more to prevent it?

409 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:05:22am

Indira Ghandi and her son were also martyred this way next door in democratic- though- part-mohammedan India. Don't remember exactly who did it. But India didn't fall apart.

410 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:05:54am

re: #398 Dotcoman

"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.

411 bullrat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:06:49am

re: #383 GreenSoccer

Obama just made a stupid statement.

That's just because he opened his mouth...

412 zionist122[deleted]  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:06:51am
413 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:07:23am

re: #379 Dotcoman

Read John Bolton's book. Then read Kenneth Timmerman's book. The latter in particular will get one's blood boiling.

It's easy to say 'just fire them'. The problem is - not only are the Congressional pinheads flying top cover for them (and will cripple the Admin with even more hearings and investigations) - but the press will crucify any Admin that is Republican and takes those steps. (Of course, Democrat Admin's are free to clean house and stock up the Exec branch with their people.) Goss, in the CIA, couldn't even fire some of the more insubordinate of his own staff without being attacked - and those he did sack were re-hired by Negroponte after Goss was gone.

Then, imagine the full court screech from the MSM and it's 7x24 impact on the majority of American's who still get their news / info from the MSM and the 30 second Katie / Keith soundbites? Particularly when they are fed by the lies and leaks of those shadow warriors.

The real world works a lot harder than the theoretical one. I agree with your sentiment - and that a clean-up is needed. The question is - Is the downside worth the effort to clean out the shadow warriors and all of their ilk throughout the government - or is it better to fight only the obvious battles (leakers / insubordination) and concentrate on the external threat?

414 Ma Sands  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:07:38am

re: #406 sneaky

What (who) is behind Islam, would not go away, even if Islam were done away with...it has been a lucrative horse for that evil one to ride, for quite some time...

415 pat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:07:47am

re: #409 alegrias

Sihks

416 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:08:35am

re: #346 Maine's Michael

re: #332 richb313


You have to wonder who has the most to gain from this terrible act.

Uh, we do, actually.

This is Dubya's and Condi's plan, blowing up.

We all benefit, over the medium term.

Really? How so?

The corrupt Clintonista State Dept., suffering from an acute case of Bush Derangement syndrome suggests corrupt Clinton friend and twice failed Bhutto to Rice as a solution to Military strong man Musharraf.

Cause that would do what exactly?

417 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:08:35am

re: #405 Opinionated

re: #397 Opinionated

Romney on the other hand- JUST LIKE BUSH- is looking for those moderate Islamics.

""For those who think Iraq is the sole front in the War on Terror, one must look no further than what has happened today. America must show its commitment to stand with all moderate forces across the Islamic world and together face the defining challenge of our generation - the struggle against violent, radical jihadists.""

* * *
Lest you forget, General Petraeus is working hard with "moderates" and the surge is working. We need a bigger, global surge to be sure.
Romney has said he will bug mosques (in Massachusetts, even!) if they foment violence. Romney gets it.

418 scaramouche  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:08:39am

Cliff May in The Corner:

Bhutto's murder points to a lesson we (the Foreign Policy Establishment in particular) has been slow to learn:

This is not some extraordinary event. This is not the work of some lone madman. This is how militant Islamists contest elections – not just in Pakistan but also in Lebanon and Gaza and wherever they they get a foothold.

Why bother with opeds, TV commercials, high-priced campaign strategists, spin doctors and pollsters when with one suicide bomber you can eliminate your opponent entirely?


Hard to argue with the logic.

419 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:09:20am

re: #393 Pickle

No offense, but she wouldn't get my vote.

420 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:09:47am

re: #406 sneaky

I made a comment stating that Islam (an ideology) must be irradicated. The comment was deleted.

Are you sure you didn't say irradiated?

421 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:09:57am

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee-

This is his reaction? Unbelievable. But he is "right" on abortion!

"The terrible violence surrounding Pakistan's upcoming election stands in stark contrast to the peaceful transition of power that we embrace in our country through our Constitution. On this sad day, we are reminded that while our democracy has flaws, it stands as a shining beacon of hope for nations and people around the world who seek peace and opportunity through self-government."

422 victor_yugo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:10:46am

re: #394 CLLRusso

I hope if it comes to it Rudy will not be a disappointment. The potential there is huge because of his lack of personal integrity. To many men think with their penis.

OTOH, if he puts it front and center (his personal life, that is) and then tells the world, "and whadd're ya gonna do abouddit?"...

Blackmail doesn't work when there are no secrets.

423 pat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:11:06am

Thanos conjectures AQ is responsible. I tend to agree. The Taliban and aQ have basically declared war on women.
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]

424 coquimbojoe  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:11:47am

re: #409 alegrias

Indira Ghandi and her son were also martyred this way next door in democratic- though- part-mohammedan India. Don't remember exactly who did it. But India didn't fall apart.

I believe it was the Sikhs... They are not really pro-mohammedian. Some yesterday put up a supposed Sikh quote to the affect of 'put your arm into a bucket of sugar to the elbow, as many grains of sugar stick to it, thats the amount of lies a Moslem will tell you'... If it is a Sikh saying, then I am not feeling the love for Islam from them.

425 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:12:34am

re: #421 Opinionated

Huck does not get it.

426 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:12:43am

re: #416 Dotcoman

It was an idiotic idea of Rice's to send her back to needle Musharaff, who is our only hope and friend in Pakistan, imperfect as he is.

So, if that idiotic idea falls apart, that is good for us (perhaps not Rice's ego, but who gives a shit) in the medium term, no?

427 gagalbert  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:12:43am

re: #397 Opinionated

"Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere -- whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi -- is an enemy of freedom," said Giuliani. "We must redouble our efforts to win the Terrorists' War on Us."

Not BS words about Democracy. Just the simple truth. It's a war. We must win.
---

I agree. Americans still have a big problem with looking evil in the eye and calling it evil. We continue to want to think that bad guys can become nice guys, and that is a fairy tale.

Pres. Bush started correctly post 9/11 but now look at him. He has incompetent and appeasing Condi at State, he allowed the leftists at the CIA to get rid of Porter Goss and you now see how they stuck a dagger in his back on Iran, and now he wants Israel to sit back and allow the creation of another terrorist state right on it border?

What ever happened to "you are either with us or you are with the terrorists." Now Bush is with Abbas and Fatah which are just as plainly terrorists as Hamas and al Qaeda.

As today's assassination of Bhutto makes clear, when you show weakness, the bad guys don't become nice, they just kill you faster.

428 pat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:13:00am

re: #424 coquimbojoe

Sihks are decidedly anti-Muslim. Decidedly.

429 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:14:07am

McCain made a good statement.

430 Dartmouth  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:14:46am

Her father was assassinated too, what a shame. Just watched an old interview clip of Bhutto on CNN with Wolf Blitzer:

"I knew the risks, I knew that they would target me, but I had to stand up for democracy and moderation. I had to stand up for the people of Pakistan--to show them the terrorists would not win."
431 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:15:08am

re: #383 GreenSoccer

Obama just made a stupid statement.

He's an idiot in black disguise

432 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:15:24am

re: #421 Opinionated

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee-

This is his reaction? Unbelievable. But he is "right" on abortion!

"The terrible violence surrounding Pakistan's upcoming election stands in stark contrast to the peaceful transition of power that we embrace in our country through our Constitution. On this sad day, we are reminded that while our democracy has flaws, it stands as a shining beacon of hope for nations and people around the world who seek peace and opportunity through self-government."

* * *
Not sure what bone you're trying to pick with Huckabee's diplomatic condolence statement. Unlike Bhutto's murderers, Huckabee cares about life, duh. Isn't that why we are lizards, not jihadists?

433 TexasPatriot  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:15:27am

re: #329 astronmr20

Our numbering of World Wars is incorrect. World War I began almost 1400 years ago when islam started. We are still fighting it (or not really fighting it) today.

434 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:15:36am

Al Qaeda claim responsibility:

A spokesperson for the al-Qaeda terrorist network has claimed responsibility for the death on Thursday of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

“We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahadeen,” Al-Qaeda’s commander and main spokesperson Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid told Adnkronos International (AKI) in a phone call from an unknown location, speaking in faltering English. Al-Yazid is the main al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan.

It is believed that the decision to kill Bhutto, who is the leader of the opposition Pakistan People's Party (PPP), was made by al-Qaeda No. 2, the Egyptian doctor, Ayman al-Zawahiri in October.

Death squads were allegedly constituted for the mission and ultimately one cell comprising a defunct Lashkar-i-Jhangvi’s Punjabi volunteer succeeded in killing Bhutto.

435 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:15:41am

Bush always makes statements about the need for justice when these things happen.

436 rakkasah  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:16:00am

I am so..very...saddened by this. Rest in Peace, Benazir Bhutto. I would to God that you could be the next Pakistani PM. May the Islamists pay tenfold.

437 bullrat  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:16:02am

re: #394 CLLRusso

To many men think with their penis.

This is not true. My penis told me that this is just a myth.

438 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:16:40am

i hope the US does not get blamed for pushing for Bhutto to come back.

439 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:17:00am

re: #417 alegrias

The surge is an American military victory. The American military will always win when given the opportunity.

But the surge is not infinite. And when it's over, when US troops leave, Iraq will fall apart. And the few "moderates" will flee or be murdered.

Romney- unlike Giuliani, even McCain- will appease just like Bush. He'll just explain it in articulate English.

440 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:17:54am

Prager's program says to create chaos benefits the Islamists.

441 yochanan  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:18:59am

OFF TOPIC
SAD OR FUNNY I DON'T KNOW

[Link: www.breitbart.com...]

442 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:19:00am

re: #413 Athos

re: #379 Dotcoman

Read John Bolton's book. Then read Kenneth Timmerman's book. The latter in particular will get one's blood boiling.

It's easy to say 'just fire them'. The problem is - not only are the Congressional pinheads flying top cover for them (and will cripple the Admin with even more hearings and investigations) - but the press will crucify any Admin that is Republican and takes those steps. (Of course, Democrat Admin's are free to clean house and stock up the Exec branch with their people.) Goss, in the CIA, couldn't even fire some of the more insubordinate of his own staff without being attacked - and those he did sack were re-hired by Negroponte after Goss was gone.

Then, imagine the full court screech from the MSM and it's 7x24 impact on the majority of American's who still get their news / info from the MSM and the 30 second Katie / Keith soundbites? Particularly when they are fed by the lies and leaks of those shadow warriors.

The real world works a lot harder than the theoretical one. I agree with your sentiment - and that a clean-up is needed. The question is - Is the downside worth the effort to clean out the shadow warriors and all of their ilk throughout the government - or is it better to fight only the obvious battles (leakers / insubordination) and concentrate on the external threat?

True. And I realize all of that. Wishful thinking, would be that by "firing" there would be an actual wall involved, but...

We elected these guys to have the smarts and courage to figure things out, and not let these treasonous sobs trip them up. Powell, let them hand him over to the French for a Mugging then turned around and let them drop him off for another mugging at the UN.

I think there's something in the water over there at State that turns people Bush sends to run the place into drooling bureaucratic zombies.

443 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:19:06am

re: #427 gagalbert

What ever happened to "you are either with us or you are with the terrorists." Now Bush is with Abbas and Fatah which are just as plainly terrorists as Hamas and al Qaeda.

That's the OLD Bush Doctrine. Didn;t you get the memo?

The new, improved Bush Doctrine has incorporated the the conclusions of the Iraq Study Group White Paper, and has been reformulated:

"You are either with us or against us, unless you're really, really against us, in which case, we're with you!"

444 victor_yugo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:19:08am

re: #438 GreenSoccer

i hope the US does not get blamed for pushing for Bhutto to come back.

Even if this is true, how does it affect the guilt of her assassins? They are still murderers, no matter the US's role in her return.

445 mj  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:19:26am

re: #369 jimsaco

Who had the most to gain from her death?

I understand they took a shot at Sharif too... who had the most to gain from having 2 opposition leaders taken out?

Exactly what assistance has Musharraf provided in the WoT that has been worth the billions in cash money he gets in "foreign aid"?


For those unaware, this poster is a Paulian.

446 Bobibutu  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:20:10am

re: #402 gadlaw

The only surprise here is that it took so long for her to be successfully assassinated. I've got CNN on and they are acting like it's some sort of surprise. --- The amazing thing is that she thought that she would not be killed if she went back, even I knew she was dead woman walking there in crazy land.

I believe she even predicted it. I recall her saying something about how she was at peace with herself no matter the outcome of her return.

I, like you, knew it was only a matter of time.

And as we all know - if people are willing to die in taking someone out there is no defense.

447 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:20:14am

re: #432 alegrias

Is the issue of her assassination a time to praise American democracy? I think we know we are not Pakistan.

Or is it a time to pledge to winning a war?

448 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:20:47am

re: #440 GreenSoccer

Prager's program says to create chaos benefits the Islamists.

True. Then the clerics can step in and remind everyone only total devotion and submission to Allah will stop the chaos - there. It's no different from Qutb, UBL, Zawahiri, and others saying that the reason so many bad things happen to the Arabs and Muslims is because they aren't devout enough...

449 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:22:17am

re: #439 Opinionated

re: #417 alegrias

The surge is an American military victory. The American military will always win when given the opportunity.

But the surge is not infinite. And when it's over, when US troops leave, Iraq will fall apart. And the few "moderates" will flee or be murdered.

Romney- unlike Giuliani, even McCain- will appease just like Bush. He'll just explain it in articulate English.

* * *
I celebrate our troops' victory in Iraq.
General Petraeus credits Iraqis with turning the tide.
Sorry you're such a pessimist--much like many were about our chances to beat and democratize Germany and Japan.

President Bush is doing the best he can. Considering it could have been Al Gore on the presidential watch when Al Qaeda hit us for the umpteenth time, I thank the Almighty for Pres. Bush's hard work at turning back the jihadist clock, however thankless.

450 bulwrk  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:23:14am

re: #394 CLLRusso

To many men think with their penis.

I'd like to respond to that but my penis is still asleep and I don't know how.

451 mj  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:24:39am

re: #151 Maine's Michael

What with Pakistan nukes in play, if Pakistan descends into a civil war over this (and I suspect it won't), it will have been the most monumental fuck up of the Baker admin.

WTF were they thinking, forcing Bhutto on Musharraf?

Don't they understand the way things need to work, in that part of the world, for the next 50 years or so?


The most monumental fuck up of the Baker Administration won't be Pakistan. It will be a toss up between allowing Iran to get nuclear weapons ("we'll let the EU handle it, no wait, we'll let Russia handle it, no wait, we'll let the UN handle it") and setting up a terrorist state next to Israel.

452 Athos  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:24:50am

re: #442 Dotcoman

I think there's something in the water over there at State that turns people Bush sends to run the place into drooling bureaucratic zombies.

It's not in the water. It's from where a lot of 'new blood' for Foggy Bottom is recruited - Ivy League schools and the like. Most have been thoroughly indoctrinated.

The fundamental Bush mistake was believing on January 22, 2001 that the 'professionals' would be professional and not partisans - combined with the bureaucratic misstep to not clean house of the political appointees or stop the seeding of shadow warriors in State. Elections are supposed to have consequences - but not anymore to a certain party who believes that they are entitled to power.

453 nolocon  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:25:00am

re: #412 zionist122

the more i think about it the more it makes sense...know arabs, no peace. no arabs, know peace

Pakistanis are not Arabs.

454 Texas Joel  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:25:45am

re: #383 GreenSoccer

Obama just made a stupid statement.

That could be boilerplate.
You have date and time stamp things that could be posted daily and hourly with such alarming accuracy.

455 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:26:34am

Like the pope learned to use the pope mobile, leaders in these countries need to develop their own version of pope mobiles and transparent bullet proof bubbles at the podium when they speak. It is lunacy for them to act as if they are in the US. We already lost a president to an open car parade. Whatever they learn, we may have to adopt. Everything the Islamists do in 1 country is practice for another country.

456 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:27:13am

re: #426 Maine's Michael

re: #416 Dotcoman

It was an idiotic idea of Rice's to send her back to needle Musharaff, who is our only hope and friend in Pakistan, imperfect as he is.

So, if that idiotic idea falls apart, that is good for us (perhaps not Rice's ego, but who gives a shit) in the medium term, no?

I agree with you there. I just refuse to believe that it was ever Rice's idea in the first place. Seemingly she's pulled all manor of boneheaded stuff since taking over at the State Dept. Those things don't happen in a vacuum. I think State among other Dept's and Agencies are running ops against Bush.

457 nyc redneck  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:29:02am

re: #425 Athos

re: #421 Opinionated

Huck does not get it.

he has spouted nonesense. he just wants to be liked.

458 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:30:46am

re: #389 selpaw

Posted earlier. And no, it's not some conspiracy, everythings laying so-wide-out-in-the-open if you attempt to take a step and look, you'll trip. Add Islamist and mix.

re: #402 gadlaw

Hey man, at least act suprised! Didn't you get the memo? We're back to the September 10th mindset.

459 victor_yugo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:32:02am

re: #453 nolocon

re: #412 zionist122

the more i think about it the more it makes sense...know arabs, no peace. no arabs, know peace

Pakistanis are not Arabs.

Furthermore, not every Arab is a Muslim. Some of them are Syrian Orthodox, and my co-religionists. And some of them, not in the Middle East, go to a church where my college friend is the abouna.

Do not conflate Arab, the ethnicity, with Islam, the ideology.

460 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:33:02am

re: #447 Opinionated

re: #432 alegrias

Is the issue of her assassination a time to praise American democracy? I think we know we are not Pakistan.

Or is it a time to pledge to winning a war?


* * *
It is time to do both PLUS offer condolences.
Prospective US candidates for the presidency ought to know their words are heard around the world, so they must multitask/multi-message for their global audience. We are a compassionate people encouraging others to pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness using our model of government. We need to use carrots, sticks and moral suasion, all the tools in the tool kit.

461 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:33:45am

re: #394 CLLRusso

If Giuliani's remarkable miraculous political achievements were due to his penis doing the thinking, I'm willing to vote for his penis for President.

And I hope he finds several similarly thinking penises for Sec's of State and Defense and other critical positions.

462 mj  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:34:01am

re: #456 Dotcoman

" I just refuse to believe that it was ever Rice's idea in the first place."

Don't kid yourself. Whose idea was it to hold elections in Gaza with the participation of Hamas despite being told ny the Israelis that Hamas would win?

463 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:35:19am

re: #452 Athos

re: #442 Dotcoman

I think there's something in the water over there at State that turns people Bush sends to run the place into drooling bureaucratic zombies.

It's not in the water. It's from where a lot of 'new blood' for Foggy Bottom is recruited - Ivy League schools and the like. Most have been thoroughly indoctrinated.

The fundamental Bush mistake was believing on January 22, 2001 that the 'professionals' would be professional and not partisans - combined with the bureaucratic misstep to not clean house of the political appointees or stop the seeding of shadow warriors in State. Elections are supposed to have consequences - but not anymore to a certain party who believes that they are entitled to power.

Yeah. I totally agree with that. Refering back to the water statement I made, I was just commenting on the likes of Powell and Rice, both of whom seemed by all accounts to be smart and accomplished, and possessed of good decision making skills; till they ended up over there.
Then in short order its like WTF?

And I myself made noise about firing some people over there in a previous post.

I know Clinton Fires all but one or two AG's and not a word is heard, Bush fires eight and all hell breaks loose. Of course it doesn't help that the Mexican Harriet Myers is the point man to explain all of that after the fact.

464 samsgran1948  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:36:50am

re: #148 Gang of One

re: #108 Maine's Michael


Another idiotic plan of Condi's, this time fortunately gone astray.

And no one, besides the tag team idiots of Rice and Bush, actually believe bringing 'democracy' to pakistan will result in anything good.


I do not argue with you, Maine. I begin to seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there are people in this world who cannot handle the complexity of democracy. I used to think that the very nature of the human soul yearned and thirsted for representative government, free and fair elections, etc. But it is dawning on me that in order for true democracy to thrive, a host of prerequisite attitudes and institutions must have been secured.

Perhaps this Bush Doctrine is a huge error?

I believe that ultimately democracy is the only sustainable system of government. But when you are dealing with areas such as the ME, the Stans and even Russia, it may be neccessary for an intermediate stage to allow the local populations to adjust to something they've never known. Just like a diver rising back to the surface after a really deep dive. If he comes up too quickly, he develops the bends and is in danger of dying.

465 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:37:56am

Since we're still rolling on this thread, I have even more reaction (follow the updates from the top) and a video of Bush's reaction (scroll to the bottom).

466 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:38:14am

re: #445 mj

re: #369 jimsaco


Who had the most to gain from her death?

I understand they took a shot at Sharif too... who had the most to gain from having 2 opposition leaders taken out?

Exactly what assistance has Musharraf provided in the WoT that has been worth the billions in cash money he gets in "foreign aid"?


For those unaware, this poster is a Paulian.

No shocker there.

467 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:38:33am

re: #456 Dotcoman

The Brit's and Rice/Powell had been working on the deal for the last 2 years. They(State & the Brit Foreign Service) screwed the pooch on the timing, horribly - Mush, sentiment wise, was hated and they thought bringing back Bhutto might help ease conditions - she, obviously, made matters worse.

Worse still was the Judges decision to allow Sharif back in...corrupt, tied to the Islamists(but so were a few of the judges)...you know the story.

468 Sharmuta  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:39:21am

re: #242 Thanos

That's an excellent point, and I hope the concept of Liberty will follow Democracy for the Iraqis- and others. Since Freedom, and hence Liberty, are foreign to them, they must learn it in reverse order, I believe. Again- so far in Iraq- it seems to be working. Look at the Christian Church we saw restored in Iraq. Baby steps...but I firmly believe it is the most basic human desire to live and breathe free. Democracy is the answer. May Liberty follow.

469 Penemue  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:39:22am

Obama's comments only underscore that he is way too inexperienced to be a serious candidate. He acts as if she died and not like she was assassinated. I doubt that he understands the true impact of the situation. This will only tip things further into Hillary's hands unfortunately...

470 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:39:24am

re: #462 mj

re: #456 Dotcoman

" I just refuse to believe that it was ever Rice's idea in the first place."

Don't kid yourself. Whose idea was it to hold elections in Gaza with the participation of Hamas despite being told ny the Israelis that Hamas would win?

The Clintonistas and Carter Admin holdovers at the State Dept., That's who. They right the reports and compile the plans and make the suggestions designed to convince the person in charge to do their bidding and move their secret agenda forward.

These people don't feel the need to answer to the figurehead appointed to be their boss.

471 canadianally  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:42:17am

The AQ hornets are no doubt a'buzzin' this morning. I was certainly no fanboy of Bhutto, but I condemn this outrageous assasination in the strongest terms. Pakistan shall now have interesting days ahead.

472 Opinionated  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:43:11am

re: #470 Dotcoman

re: #462 mj

re: #456 Dotcoman
" I just refuse to believe that it was ever Rice's idea in the first place."
Don't kid yourself. Whose idea was it to hold elections in Gaza with the participation of Hamas despite being told ny the Israelis that Hamas would win?
The Clintonistas and Carter Admin holdovers at the State Dept., That's who. They right the reports and compile the plans and make the suggestions designed to convince the person in charge to do their bidding and move their secret agenda forward.

These people don't feel the need to answer to the figurehead appointed to be their boss.

You live in your own neat little universe, don't you?

473 arctic medic  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:43:33am

As usual Robert Spencer Has some good info on the subject.

474 Dairenn  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:43:57am

So, these guys shot and killed her, but then went ahead and set off an explosion? I guess they didn't want to take any chances.

I knew this was going to happen. I even figured it was going happen in a very dramatic way - a big rally, she's sticking out like a sore thumb, all exposed to ballstic weaponry. Had she survived that attack, her security advisor should have been fired.

This sucks. I'm not exactly sure I believe Musharraf at all either; I almost think his police/military forces either were behind this attack or knew it was going to happen, and allowed it. There are a LOT of sympathizers in his government. We've had problems with that when trying to get bin Laden in the mountains separating Pakistan from Afghanistan.

475 ElKafir  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:44:38am

Before she could become PM, she had to get married - you know those devout muslims could never allow a single woman to be in charge of things. She married into the biggest drug lord family in South Asia.
Being a devout socialist (read:communist), she has always had most of her support base from radical students and the poor (easily bought votes). Her administration when she was Prime Minister was as corrupt as her father's, & he was asassinated too.
One saving grace from her death (if not the only one) is that she has recently had her life threatened by both Al-Q and the Taliban for her support of the war on terrorism. I wouldn't be surprised if Musharref didn't take advantage of the situation to do her butt in, but hard to say. I can see Musharref turning his army loose up in the tribal area to at least run bin laden's boys out of Pakistan, and back into Afghanistan for the U.S. military to deal with.

476 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:46:02am

You seamingly rational people can bash everyone you want and throw blame everywhere you want, but, that it is merely the stupid use of hindsight. Whether you know it or not, President Bush has a reponsibility to carry out the long term agreements of the government of the USA. Creating new aliances and agreements that further the generational goals laid out by the Congress of the USA.
Granted this can be very complicated, and take unfortunate ( to say the least ) turns. It is in are interest to, as citizens, to not be bystanders. Even this congress will buckle to an informed public. Isn't it our responsibility to demand action from our congressmen and true journalism from our media.
STOP ALL THIS B... S...

477 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:46:53am

re: #396 headlesschickens

re: #330 LANMaster

Somebody is not recognizing sarcasm.

Woopsie.

Sorry 'bout that.

478 Chuck Pelto  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:47:55am

TO: Penemue
RE: Obama's 'Inexperience'?

Obama's comments only underscore that he is way too inexperienced to be a serious candidate. He acts as if she died and not like she was assassinated. I doubt that he understands the true impact of the situation. This will only tip things further into Hillary's hands unfortunately... -- Penemue [#469]

It's what I'd expect of a Muslim, in a land of infidels, to say. It (1) shows he is 'sympathetic' and, more importantly, (2) doesn't offend the Muslims who murdered her.

After all, in the Islamofascist opinion, she was an uppity female who was trying to gain power over men. Obviously, in their opinion, she had to be done away with.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

479 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:48:14am

re: #410 Opinionated

re: #398 Dotcoman

"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.

Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.

It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?

480 Know Your Enemy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:48:23am

re: #190 mingjaiyo

#66 opinionated I must agree.I have felt from a long time prior to the attacks of 11 Sept. that the growing islamist threat would be the foremost issue of our time. I am daily dismayed by those in the west that either just don't get it or refuse to see it for what it is because the reality scares the shit out of them. I have only one criteria for president in the upcoming election-how will that person deal with the islamists. Among those running it seems all the front runners are concerned with anything else but islamofacism and it's spread.Talk all you want about abortion,healthcare,immigration,two Americas,taxes,etc.None of it means shit if the islamists win. We are repeating in Afghanistan what we did in VietNam...we are allowing,for any number of reasons, the enemy to have a base of operations across a border we dare not cross. In VietNam it was the countries of Laos and Cambodia (only visited by those in the secret units of MAVCSOG).Today it is the area of Waziristan and in particular the city of Quetta where the Taliban openly march in the street daily.This war will never be truly won until this issue is addressed and the islamists confronted directly through every means-calling the enemy by name and utilizing every political,economic,educational,and military option available.

I am now a single-issue voter, and Rudy's got Daniel Pipes on his team. Nuff said.

481 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:48:29am

re: #356 hillary clinton

re: #271 Gang of One

re: #258 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #245 Gang of One

re: #205 hillary clinton

If the current administration had not failed on universal health care. This would have never happened.

STFU and STFD.

Imbecile.

Sarcasm tag only required for imbeciles I guess.

Yeah. I am an imbecile. Having a bad day, unrelated to all this.

Please accept my apologies, Hill.

With an attitude like that I'm going to put you in my cabinet.

LOL!

Hillary is Aisha is Dave?

482 WrathofG-d  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:48:45am
483 itellu3times  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:50:36am

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

I'm OK with what Obama said, and Huckabee. Yes, Giuliani sees the issues more clearly, that's why he's my man, but his statement wasn't all that different from the others.

I heard a report that Hildabeast stepped all over it in her statement, was the most self-serving of all. Doh! Comments poorly reported and already revised, apparently. Anyone have a link to her early comments, supposedly along the lines of, "... and that shows why I should be elected!"

484 Maine's Michael  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:52:49am

re: #476 littleO

No, its not hindsight. Its common sense.

Check back on our posts from weeks ago re Bhutto's return to Pakiland.

485 J.S.  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:53:38am

re: #475 ElKafir

Bhutto's father was hanged...by another violent/corrupt leader of Pakistan. (look that guy up at Wiki). Pakistan is a hideously violent society. And, I guess, violence is integral to their "political" system.

I doubt that Musharraf would be implicated in this (even though there's probably no love lost...Musharraf and Bhutto were antagonists -- but I really don't think Musharraf would willingly plunge the country into chaos.)

I think it's the work of Islamists...they have the most to win. (And I suspect it was some inside job...in terms of a sudden security "lapse" -- ie, rolling down a window-- which allowed a gunman to open fire on Bhutto who otherwise would have been safe inside an armoured vehicle). but this needs to be investigated...have to wait and see...

486 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:54:16am

re: #472 Opinionated

re: #470 Dotcoman

re: #462 mj

re: #456 Dotcoman

" I just refuse to believe that it was ever Rice's idea in the first place."

Don't kid yourself. Whose idea was it to hold elections in Gaza with the participation of Hamas despite being told ny the Israelis that Hamas would win?

The Clintonistas and Carter Admin holdovers at the State Dept., That's who. They right the reports and compile the plans and make the suggestions designed to convince the person in charge to do their bidding and move their secret agenda forward.These people don't feel the need to answer to the figurehead appointed to be their boss.

You live in your own neat little universe, don't you?

Not at all. How could that be? I just pointed out there are enemies working in the govn't. there are other people out there and on this very thread making the same charge.

487 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:54:45am

Thompson is making a good statement.


Did Edwards say something? Where is Hillary? Where is Romney?
Is Hunter at work somewhere? Where is Uncle Paul? He'll probably consider it irrelevant except for the loss of life.

488 yochanan  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:54:50am

re: #450 bulwrk

remember for every guy who thinks with that part there is a woman who thinks with hers, it takes two to tango the last time i looked.

489 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:57:10am

re: #345 LANMaster

re: #341 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #330 LANMaster


re: #325 headlesschickens


Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.


I suppose with registration opening so often lately, we're bound to suck in a moonbat or two.


So George's handling has been effective?

ROLLEYES:

Bush "handles" Pakistani affairs?

The comment made was:


Remain calm, W told us years ago Islam was a religion of peace. Nothing to worry about.

Nothing to do with Pakistan, but the WOT and his handling of. Keep rollin' the eyes.

490 Banner  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:57:52am

I'm surprised people seem to be forgetting all the really bad stuff she did as Prime minister, and forgot all the crooked politics and corruption. I don't like to speak ill of the dead, but truth be told, if she got re-elected it would have made things far worse than they are today. She came back because she was hoping to take over, and she probably would have destroyed the country with her greed. She was a bad person.

491 Gang of One  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:58:39am

re: #409 alegrias

Indira Ghandi and her son were also martyred this way next door in democratic- though- part-mohammedan India. Don't remember exactly who did it. But India didn't fall apart.

IIRC, Indira was assassinated by her Sikh security detachment.

492 McBain  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:59:13am
493 MJ  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 9:59:21am

re: #479 Dotcoman

re: #410 Opinionated


re: #398 Dotcoman

"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.


Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.

It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?

The advice is coming from James Baker, Brent Scowcroft , Stephen Hadley.

494 alegrias  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:00:13am

re: #479 Dotcoman

re: #410 Opinionated


re: #398 Dotcoman

"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.


Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.

It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?


* * *
Guess you missed the media's fun with the Valerie Pflame affair? Coming soon to a theater near you!

495 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:00:32am

see
[Link: www.turkishpress.com...]

It has parts of statements, not the whole statement. So so far Hunter and Ron Paul (and Keyes, and Gravell and Kucinich) have not been heard from.

496 Banner  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:00:45am

re: #190 mingjaiyo

#66 opinionated I must agree.I have felt from a long time prior to the attacks of 11 Sept. that the growing islamist threat would be the foremost issue of our time. I am daily dismayed by those in the west that either just don't get it or refuse to see it for what it is because the reality scares the shit out of them. I have only one criteria for president in the upcoming election-how will that person deal with the islamists. Among those running it seems all the front runners are concerned with anything else but islamofacism and it's spread.Talk all you want about abortion,healthcare,immigration,two Americas,taxes,etc.None of it means shit if the islamists win. We are repeating in Afghanistan what we did in VietNam...we are allowing,for any number of reasons, the enemy to have a base of operations across a border we dare not cross. In VietNam it was the countries of Laos and Cambodia (only visited by those in the secret units of MAVCSOG).Today it is the area of Waziristan and in particular the city of Quetta where the Taliban openly march in the street daily.This war will never be truly won until this issue is addressed and the islamists confronted directly through every means-calling the enemy by name and utilizing every political,economic,educational,and military option available.

This issue was actually first pointed out to me in the mid 1970's by a number of writers and politicians that everyone laughed at. I didn't laugh, I paid attention. Sure enough, they were pretty much spot on in their predictions.

497 J.S.  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:01:05am

re: #487 GreenSoccer

Romney's already spoken. (wasn't impressed.)

498 htom  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:01:28am

There's going to be a noisy crowd that will blame Musharraf regardless of any investigation.

May she rest in peace.

499 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:02:05am

Oops. I forgot about Huckabee.

500 Banner  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:04:18am

re: #491 Gang of One

re: #409 alegrias

Indira Ghandi and her son were also martyred this way next door in democratic- though- part-mohammedan India. Don't remember exactly who did it. But India didn't fall apart.
IIRC, Indira was assassinated by her Sikh security detachment.

Indira, there was another corrupt and bad person. And her son was just plain evil.

501 unrealizedviewpoint  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:04:31am

re: #477 LANMaster

re: #396 headlesschickens

re: #330 LANMaster

Somebody is not recognizing sarcasm.

Woopsie.

Sorry 'bout that.

It's not solely sarcasm. There is truth. Our president does refer to Islam as "The Religion of Peace."

How can one fight an undefined war?

502 DistantThunder  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:06:46am

re: #296 Maine's Michael

Romney certainly loves to churn out the verbiage.

I think that is what a Romney Admin will be like.

Lots of verbiage.

I believe he woulg go with the State Dept flow, at the end of the day.

I know a lot of people here have issues with Rudy on gun control and abortion.

The man has already said he wouldn't ram his personal beliefs down anybodies throat.

I ask that you put your issues with him aside, and concentrate on the the important foreign policy areas where he is likely to take the right moves -more so than any other candidate.

Verbiage - When Romney campaigned for governor he had an aid take down all the promises he was was making on the stump - mostly to to with reforms and cutting taxes. When he was elected he had close to 100 campaign promises so he added a few more to make it an even 100. By the end of his term he had accomplished all 100 items.

Romney was a valedictorian, and graduated magna cum laude from graduate school and turned around 200 + companies, saving them from total collapse - is a doer by character, not a talker.

503 Canadian Guy  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:08:29am
Victor Davis Hanson
We don’t know exactly who assassinated Ms. Bhutto, but, given the infiltration of the Pakistani secret services by Islamic extremists, it seems likely that al-Qaeda-like jihadists, with the deliberate blind eye of the government, were responsible. Same old, same old in the Middle East: The jihadists are cruel and crazy, the dictatorial alternative is duplicitous and illegitimate, and the democratic third way is weak and vulnerable.

Pakistan is a nuclear dictatorship, with a thin Westernized elite sitting atop a vast medieval Islamist badlands that it cannot control. Today’s events show that the very notion of a pro-Western politician coming to power legitimately is unlikely for the immediate future.

Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee, among others, have suggested that it’s about time to consider incursions into Pakistan to strike al-Qaeda. That would be like putting a needle into a doughboy: The problem is not a particular region, or a particular Pakistani figure, but Pakistan itself, founded as an Islamic state, and by nature prone to extremism. It is the most anti-American country in the region and we should accept that and move on.

Our relations were always based on the flawed idea its Islamic and autocratic essence made it a good bulwark against communist Russia and socialist India. But the world has changed, and we should too. It is long past time to smile and curtail aid — and quit arming it with weapons that are more likely to be used against our friend India as bin Laden.

I would imagine once most of the “reform” candidates are killed or cowered, the emboldened terrorist animals will turn on their government feeders — even as the Pakistani street somehow blames us.

[Link: article.nationalreview.com...]

504 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:09:06am

re: #467 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

re: #456 Dotcoman

The Brit's and Rice/Powell had been working on the deal for the last 2 years. They(State & the Brit Foreign Service) screwed the pooch on the timing, horribly - Mush, sentiment wise, was hated and they thought bringing back Bhutto might help ease conditions - she, obviously, made matters worse.

Worse still was the Judges decision to allow Sharif back in...corrupt, tied to the Islamists(but so were a few of the judges)...you know the story.

Exactly. But I don't think it was Rice/ Powell, but rather an independent US State Dept. working with the Brits pushing this. The whole deal was engineered for failure.

505 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:12:15am

re: #494 alegrias

re: #479 Dotcoman

re: #410 Opinionated


re: #398 Dotcoman"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.


Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?


* * *
Guess you missed the media's fun with the Valerie Pflame affair? Coming soon to a theater near you!

I missed it? Didn't you just quote me and bold up what I said? Clintonista Plame and her jackass of a husband were exactly the sort of treasonous people I was thinking of, when I said what I said.

506 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:13:38am

Huckabee: not a good statement.

507 littleO  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:15:06am

re: #484 Maine's Michael

re: #476 littleO

No, its not hindsight. Its common sense.

Check back on our posts from weeks ago re Bhutto's return to Pakiland.

Percentagewise how many voters read and remembered that post.
Lets march brother.

508 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:15:49am

re: #503 Canadian Guy

Wow! Thanks.

509 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:16:37am

re: #493 MJ

re: #479 Dotcoman

re: #410 Opinionated


re: #398 Dotcoman"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.


Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?

The advice is coming from James Baker, Brent Scowcroft , Stephen Hadley.

Yeah, and those are such good examples too right.

State is still running it's own program.

They were even running their own independent agenda back during Reagan too, and didn't like it when Presidents or other outsiders got in the way of it either. Go read up on who was Charlie Wilson.

510 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:18:12am

re: #488 yochanan

you exagerate.

511 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:19:59am

So where is Hunter? Does he not take himself seriously anymore?
Is the media refusing his phonecall?

512 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:22:50am

Kucinich has made a statement that sounds contradictory.

513 MJ  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:25:34am

re: #509 Dotcoman

re: #493 MJ


re: #479 Dotcoman

re: #410 Opinionated

re: #398 Dotcoman"that have been giving Powell and now Rice bad advice,"

You left out Bush.

Poor babies. They got bad advice. If they only had a brain they would recognise what many of us on this forum alone recognise.


Yes I did, but I figured that went without saying; if the leftist traitors are feeding the President's Secretary of State bad advice in order to work a subversive agenda against the best interests of the United States, it's pretty much a no brainer who they are really working against.It's their job to give the Sec. of State and the President honest non-partisan advice.

Do you think it's funny that there are Liberal Dems at the State Dept. and other agencies giving bad advice and running treasonous partisan ops against a sitting president elected by the people of the United States?


The advice is coming from James Baker, Brent Scowcroft , Stephen Hadley.

Yeah, and those are such good examples too right.

State is still running it's own program.

They were even running their own independent agenda back during Reagan too, and didn't like it when Presidents or other outsiders got in the way of it either. Go read up on who was Charlie Wilson.

So now you're getting your information from Hollywood.

514 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:27:04am

re: #493 MJ

Take a look at the relations & relationships between Rice & the the following: Philip D. Zelikow(especially this guy), Collin Powell, Brent Scowcroft & James A. Baker III - our {you know 'whats'} shuss

re: #504 Dotcoman.

Nuts! ...and fergen some 'independent' cyclone mackshin inside State, whatever...that's ridiculous, look at where Bhutto was spending time last September-August.

Independent...that I do find funny - unfortunately for reasons you probably wouldn't appreciate - but there is a hint in the names above. Sorry.

515 Sharmuta  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:27:20am

FYI- Charles but up an update thread on Bhutto.

516 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:28:08am

re: #503 Canadian Guy

Wow! How the Dovey Liberals ( Obama -Huckelbee0 suddenly want to go to war in Pakistan?

Anywone else here think that maybe this whole thing is just another US State Dept. plot against Bush to keep Team Bush out of Iran?

Just like that bogus NIE report was "supposed" to be such a blow to Bush and his plot to invade Iran? Never mind the fact that that whole piece of Bullshit was written by three highly partisan Clintonistas with chips on their shoulders and a serious case of Bush Derangement Syndrome over at the US State Dept.

They wrote the NIE report specifically to bolster Iran, and this deal where they got Rice to push for meddling in the affairs of Pakistan by reintroducing Bhutto was just a back up plot in case someone saw through the blatant NIE attempt.

517 Sharmuta  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:30:16am

Er- PUT up.

/{P}IMF

518 itellu3times  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:39:56am

re: #512 GreenSoccer

Kucinich has made a statement that sounds contradictory.

Linkies, please!

[Link: www.wkyc.com...]

This is a very dangerous moment for the world," said Kucinich, Ohio's 10th congressional district representative, after hearing of former Pakistani prime minister Benzair Bhutto's death.
"The United States must change its policy direction in the region. It must stop adding fuel to the fire," Kucinich said.

Thanks, Dennis. Why did the aliens allow it?

519 LANMaster  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:40:17am

re: #501 unrealizedviewpoint

re: #477 LANMaster


re: #396 headlesschickens

re: #330 LANMaster

Somebody is not recognizing sarcasm.


Woopsie.

Sorry 'bout that.


It's not solely sarcasm. There is truth. Our president does refer to Islam as "The Religion of Peace."

How can one fight an undefined war?

I can agree with you about the President's mis-statement that Islam is a religion of peace.
However, I would assert that most Muslims function peacefully within the religion.
But there are extremists who take the Qu'ran and pervert (somewhat) it to declare a state of war with all non-Muslims.

520 AirForceWife  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:49:57am

#133 experiencedtraveller 12/27/07 7:25:31 am 3


Then count me with the idiots. Democracy is the only hope for humanity.

Democracy is only an instrument of Freedom. It is not the supreme or essential element of a free society. The desire for personal liberty so strong that the cause is worth dying for is the essential element.

521 Dairenn  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:51:09am

re: #27 freetoken

re: #21 resize

If civil war does break out...I hope Musharrafs government has a way of turning "off" the nukes.

Post 9/11 and before the US moved in Afghanistan, China offered to safeguard the Paki nukes, as a sort of neutral third party.

China? Oh yeah, that makes me feel ALL KINDS of better.

/

522 jenv  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:53:51am

re: #424 coquimbojoe

I believe it was the Sikhs... They are not really pro-mohammedian. Some yesterday put up a supposed Sikh quote to the affect of 'put your arm into a bucket of sugar to the elbow, as many grains of sugar stick to it, thats the amount of lies a Moslem will tell you'... If it is a Sikh saying, then I am not feeling the love for Islam from them.


Sikhs hate Muslims. I believe Sikhs are a response to the slaughter of Hindus committed by Muslim invaders, and the refusal of Hindus to defend themselves (pacifism, doncha know). I've known a few; very nice people.

523 Is it me?  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:54:36am

I'm not surprised given the amount of attempts already on her life. She was a member of an influential political family but was tainted by corruption, altho whether any better or worse than others in Pakistan I do not know. She went into exile to avoid court and only went back when invited. She wanted to be PM for a third time and had her eyes on the prize. Politics in Pakistan has always at best been too exciting on occasion and at worst dangerously volatile. After all, they hanged her father. Whether Parvez has the backing of the Army is very important. Perhaps this will spur him to take action over the terrorists, but considering the kidnapping of numbers of the army lately I wouldn't like to bet on it. If he doesn't then the whole country is liable to descend into a political/tribal/political whirlwind littered with bodies. Probably a lot of bodies. Her supporters immediately started to make political hay out of her death, but do they have the political will, the support of enough people, including the army to get a grip on what is starting to happen and calm things down. I doubt it. It's going to take a strong hand and even stronger nerves.
Pakistan is a member of the Commonwealth (altho I think Robber Brown suspended them a while ago for some reason) and so receives aid. I would guess in excess of 100 million pounds a year but it could be more if he is still helping in the war against terror.

#95 Cagney - doesn't surprise me a bit. Blair and now Brown are appeasers. Brown is especially gutless. He knows nothing of the British - we call a spade a spade; and where terrorists are concerned they should be called exactly what they are - Islamic terrorists.
7/7 was not some little accident. It was not the actions of a few misguided people who all happened to blow up innocent people on the same day. It was orchestrated. It was an act of war on innocent members of the public within our own borders and a betrayal so profound I'm not sure we will ever recover from it. It has changed things forever, like 9/11. To call it anything else is appeasement, cowardice and treason.

#237 Eowyn2 - I've read plenty of your posts and I do not see you as a weak, fragile female at all. Women only fight when all other avenues are closed, if forced to fight Girls fight dirty - cat fight! Regards

524 jenv  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:57:03am

re: #459 victor_yugo


Do not conflate Arab, the ethnicity, with Islam, the ideology.


We shouldn't, but we should remember that Arabs do, even non-Muslim Arabs.

525 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:02:40am

re: #513 MJ

Hollywood?

Not at all. I've been following Wilson's true exploits for years.

that's why I said read up on him.
I didn't suggest you buy a ticket and a bucket O' popcorn.

526 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:17:30am

re: #518 itellu3times

Yes I should have put in the link. The newspapers are cutting and pasting pieces of peoples' statement which is not fair. They are making some people look more reasonable than they are.

527 Roger  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:18:28am

Islam is Evil Incarnate.

528 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:23:07am

So should we be not interfering or should we be interfering with a new policy? Make up your mind.
---

[Link: www.prnewswire.com...]

Statement on the Death of Benazir Bhutto From Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich

MANCHESTER, N.H., Dec. 27 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Democratic
Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich issued the following statement this morning after hearing the news of the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto:

"This is a very dangerous moment for the world. Prime Minister Bhutto represented the forces of reform and the hope for an end to repression in a troubled region, and her death is a major loss to those efforts."

"This terrible tragedy also underscores the need for the United States to adopt a new foreign policy toward the entire region because our current policy is all wrong. Our interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan has opened wide the doors of repression and violence. At this very moment, we should be working with leaders of the region to convene a meeting at the highest levels to begin a new effort towards stabilization and peace."

"The United States must take a new direction in Pakistan and throughout the region. I met her several times, both in Washington and New York. She was deeply and genuinely dedicated to Pakistan. This is a tragic loss."

529 Orde  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:37:24am

re: #372 GreenSoccer

Giuliani made a statement. He gets it.

Wrong. Pakistan is the worst possible place on the planet to attempt democracy right now.

530 Crusader Rabbit  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:43:42am

I admit I haven't been looking for it... has anyone seen ink on how the strife in Pakistan is because of US support of Israel? I mean really, orthodox muslims will kill everyone in sight without remorse and we're supposed to believe (per Kos, Ron Paul etc.) that if we threw Israel to the dogs (hamas, fatah, hezbollah) this would all stop.

HOGWASH!

531 greensoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:45:21am

re: #529 Orde

He got that this is part of the world wide war against terrorism. He has said a lot of things this morning. Maybe you only saw a piece.

532 greensoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:46:57am

If someone sees something that Hunter or Ron Paul said, please let us know. I know what Ron Paul will say, but Hunter where are youuu?

533 greensoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:50:13am

re: #530 Crusader Rabbit

You are right. Indonesia and Pakistan and Bangladesh have their own worlds that they live in. Remember 1 million people died in India on the way to creating Pakistan. Is that Israel's fault? Uh nooo. And it was not a matter of the crusades wither. India is Hindu. As a Pakistani Muslim once told me, the people who converted to Islam in India were the untouchables.

534 Dotcoman  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:55:18am

re: #529 Orde

re: #372 GreenSoccer

Giuliani made a statement. He gets it.

Wrong. Pakistan is the worst possible place on the planet to attempt democracy right now.

But of the 6 known forms of government ( 3 good 3 bad) , Democracy was identified as the absolute worst form of Government by the Ancient Greeks.

I couldn't possibly think of anyone more deserving of a good dose of it, at the moment.

535 ecor1  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 12:00:29pm

i think everyone on this thread should look up the wikpedia thread on

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

this is just a list up to invading viennna. afterward it is considered "modern"

please note you have to scroll through three pages to get to the bottom and find "modern wars", which then have to be clicked to be listed

it is continuous for 14 centuries

536 MoonbatBane  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 12:39:07pm

re: #7 MrSilverDragon

May she rest in peace.

Agreed.

I wish I knew how to fix their backwards misogynistic culture. Peacefully, of course.

Sorry, I don't care about "peacefully" anymore. I used to. Now I just want this 7th century misogynistic death cult culture (note, I'm not saying islam, I'm saying the 7th century misogynistic death cult culture that has been built around it -- aka jihadist islamism) exterminated, along with its adherents. It is a cancer. How do you handle cancer? You cut it out and/or kill it. Period.

537 Droplet  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 10:49:36pm

re: #68 Keli

She was an incredibly brave woman.
R.I.P Benazir Bhutto.

Deep down, I believe she had a self-destructive thirst for power and status, fueled by the obvious appeal of the martyr ingrained in Muslims. Her life in exile turned her into a well-off mom in London and occasional star on college campuses. Nothing more. How boring for this overachiever.
I watched a recent interview with her where she says that she's not in danger because Muslims don't harm women. This tells me that she was completely out of touch with reality, of course, but evidence was never her strong point, even when scores of her supporters were killed and then constantly endangered at her rallies, she didn't appear to modify her security arrangements. Her final act of vanity was sliding back the sunroof of her SUV and rising so the teeming mob could see her, as if she's running for city council in Newcastle or Manchester.
She died because she didn't understand that Islam is undergoing a radical reformation at the moment. Radicalism is winning.

538 GreenSoccer  Thu, Dec 27, 2007 11:51:13pm

Considering that her father was hung and her husband was imprisoned
and she and her mother were put in prison many times and her brother died mysteriously, maybe she was having PTSD?
She often mentioned that she stayed in politics for her dead father's sake.

539 GreenSoccer  Fri, Dec 28, 2007 1:35:01am

There was an assassiantiona ttempt in karachi within the last 3 months where 158 people died. how coudl she say Muslims won't kill a woman when they tried? That does not amke any sense. She said she attended the funerals etc.

Now watch the whole thing and turn the sound up and se if you hear what she says

540 GreenSoccer  Fri, Dec 28, 2007 1:54:21am

She made the statement that no true Muslim would kill a woman. Do you think sh was trying to make herself a martyr by proving that Al Quada was not practicing true Islam?

People on Tv said that as PM she had supported the taliban or was it al qaeda as part of Pakistan's plans to expand into Afghanistan so that the fact that they killed her was her own karma coming back to get her...

541 jenv  Fri, Dec 28, 2007 8:43:07am

re: #540 GreenSoccer

She made the statement that no true Muslim would kill a woman. Do you think she was trying to make herself a martyr by proving that Al Quada was not practicing true Islam?


She may have been trying to prove that. The problem for her is that al-Qaeda is practicing true Islam.

542 idaniboy  Fri, Dec 28, 2007 8:48:25am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

excellent post!

543 GreenSoccer  Fri, Dec 28, 2007 9:42:55am

re: #31 SpiritOf1683

I object to the words "failed state" since Leftists are also using that term to refer to Israel. It is a cop out. Who gave Pakistan nuclear technology? In Pakistan's case it was a Canadian. Why does no one remember to throw the mud in their direction? Now Russia is selling nuclear technology and defense systems that can shoot down Israeli planes, and China helps wherever it can. Canada, China, and Russia are not Islam. They are GREEDY. Remember to throw mud at Russia and at China.

544 Kirly  Mon, Dec 31, 2007 8:53:58am

re: #70 SpiritOf1683

re: #54 scaramouche


#31 Spiritof1683

Think of how successful Pakistan might have been if only the Jews had been allowed to run it.


I would imagine that even the troglodytes would have made a better succress of running Pakistan than the Muslim savages who populate it.

what exactly are you saying there spiritof1683?


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Shockingly sensible.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

If it can be conceived as music, it can be executed as music, and presented to an audience in such a way that they will perceive it as music: "Look at this. Ever seen one of these before? I built this for you. What do you mean, 'What the f*ck is it?' It's a goddam ETUDE, asshole."