LGF

-RetweetOutrage of the Week: Canadian Publisher Persecuted for Mindcrime

Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:31:36 pm PST

An excellent opening statement by Ezra Levant, at his Canadian Human Rights Commission “hearing” for publishing the Danish cartoons of blasphemy. This hearing is an outrage, and Levant is brilliant here.

Youtube Video

In the second video in this series, Levant answers a bizarre Kafkaesque question from his inquisitor:

Youtube Video

And the third video deals with the real source of violence:

Youtube Video

(Hat tip: Mambo Bananapatch.)

Advertisement

533 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Racer X  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:33:13pm

I know what you're thinking.

2 WrathofG-d  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:33:29pm

Oh Canada...

3 savage_nation[deleted]  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:34:00pm
4 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:36:26pm

Joy Camp, off to Joy Camp.

5 WrathofG-d  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:38:53pm

Yes...that opening statement is BRILLIANT!

6 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:39:07pm

Thank you Charles for exposing the kangaroo court of Canada.

This is a stinking disgrace.

Steyn is next!

7 MagnaniomousCoward  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:40:26pm

Downloading at full force in case YouTube delete this.

8 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:41:43pm

My new hero alongside Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Speak up and show what Islam is really about. Terrific!

9 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:42:48pm

Why is she uncovered?

STONE HER !

10 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:42:58pm

I don't know that woman and I never met that woman, But I know her type. I bet she knows what's best for me. I bet she would be proud to call herself a progressive. I bet she would think I am a Neanderthal narrow minded neocon bigot. And boy is she lucky I can't put my hands thru this computer screen and grab hold of her arrogant neck. But that's just me!

11 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:43:42pm

Would Google/Youtube dare attempt to censor this? Maybe not. Turn the volume down by 30dB or so? Of course...

12 gop_patriot  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:43:52pm

re: #8 debutaunt

My new hero alongside Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Speak up and show what Islam is really about. Terrific!

Yes, we'll definitely have to remember Mr. Levant when the 2008 Fallaci Award is voted on!

13 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:44:06pm

She looks pissed listening to him. He makes sense so she is not amused.

14 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:45:14pm

Human Rights Wrongs Commission

fixed

15 Le_Patriot  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:45:49pm
16 Mambo Bananapatch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:45:52pm

re: #8 debutaunt

My new hero alongside Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Speak up and show what Islam is really about. Terrific!

I agree! However, I think the importance of this story is that is demonstrates what Canada is about, or at least what it is becoming, more so than Islam.

17 Orde  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:46:34pm

This is awesome--I'm still listening to the first video--thanks Charles!

18 WrathofG-d  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:46:35pm

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

19 savage_nation[deleted]  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:46:38pm
20 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:47:03pm

Body language, she has crossed her arms and sat back. Nothing he says is what she wants to hear. B**ch.

21 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:47:06pm

re: #15 Le_Patriot

Would this be considered bad timing to post?

Were can I buy one?

22 me  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:47:24pm

Thanks for posting this, Charles.

23 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:47:36pm

Is it possible we are seeing the 2008 Fiskie and fallacci award winners at the same table?

24 winston06  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:47:45pm

I'm proud to work for Mr. Levant's online journal Shotgun.

[Link: westernstandard.blogs.com...]

25 amphibian  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:48:05pm

Just started watching. Who is the ass-clown on the left-hand side of the table? Her body language and facial expressions seem to indicate that she is fighting back a desire to do bodily harm to the heretic that she sees before her. Lawyer? low-level bureaucrat in a low-level bureaucracy whose sense of personal importance is being threatened? She is obviously emotionally involved, and obviously not on Mr. Levant's side.

26 Richard Romano  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:48:32pm

Levant is one tough cookie -- he is the wrong person to mess with when it comes to such things...the AHRC is a farce and a joke, another left wing outfit that desires to take away free speech, not provide it.

Sad, sad, sad...

27 Racer X  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:49:23pm

I like how she sits there during his opening statement with her arms folded like she is pissed and is going to really get after him.

Ezra then proceeds to destroy her logic.

28 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:49:29pm

Couldn't hear her question. I have the volume turned up as high as it will go and his voice is hard to hear, but her question is impossible.

29 racecardriver  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:49:33pm

Charles, thank you.

This is the most important and relevant post you've put up in the last 5 years, imo.

all I can say is "wow".

30 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:49:46pm

re: #23 Shug

Is it possible we are seeing the 2008 Fiskie and fallacci award winners at the same table?

Definitely possible.

31 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:50:12pm

re: #21 Nevergiveup

re: #15 Le_Patriot


Would this be considered bad timing to post?

Were can I buy one?

Is that a bobblehead?

32 Orde  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:50:16pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Sorry, not seeing any arrogance or rudeness whatsoever, but detail-filled, fact-based justified righteous indignation. (I just completed video one so far.)

33 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:50:29pm

Got all the way through them.
Levant is smokin'!
WOW!
Sic 'em, son!

34 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:50:54pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

He has every right to be obnoxious and rude. Being yanked up in front of a kangaroo court, like that.

I'd be obnoxious and rude too.

35 BignJames  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:51:55pm

Fantastic! Check out the inquisitors body language in the first video. From the second...(paraphrasing)..."they say I've offended mohammed, he's dead."

Priceless!

36 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:52:08pm

re: #24 winston06

I'm proud to work for Mr. Levant's online journal Shotgun.

[Link: westernstandard.blogs.com...]

WOW! A quote from your link:

"Are Canada's "Human Rights" Commissions just slo-mo Kristallnachts?"

37 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:52:25pm

re: #29 racecardriver

Charles, thank you.

This is the most important and relevant post you've put up in the last 5 years, imo.

all I can say is "wow".


I couldn't agree more.

38 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:52:57pm

"he's dead by the way, so don't think I've offended him." Brilliant!

"i have the right to publish." "even if i offend".

39 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:53:29pm

All three videos were brilliant. I loved his answer to the question of his intent- because he had the right to do so. And his question in the final video was also spot on- do these grievance theater productions cause more or less harm to the ummah?

Great videos- thanks for sharing them, Charles.

40 Le_Patriot  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:53:33pm

re: #31 newsjunkie_ky

re: #21 Nevergiveup

re: #15 Le_Patriot


Would this be considered bad timing to post?


Were can I buy one?

Is that a bobblehead?

___
Bobblehead, yes.
Dare not sell in store...they keel you !

41 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:53:48pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Beg to differ (even considering his use of the expletive "bloody").

Given what's he's being hit with, he's a citizen in righteous indignation and he has a right to be so.

42 Orde  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:54:03pm

I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.

43 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:54:38pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

Have you ever been before a " Human Rights Panel " . Believe me they are one step away from a police state. The people on them and the ideas they represent are the worst kind of pseudo-intellectual bullshit on this planet. And the cost involved in having to defend yourself before a panel that assumes you are guilty can be astronomical. It is difficult not to harbor ill will towards them and to not hold the entire process in contempt!

44 resize  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:54:52pm

Thought crime...This is way overboard. Appalling really that the man has to explain himself to a the Canadian government over publishing stupid cartoons!

45 winslow  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:55:20pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Obnoxious, arrogant and rude.

"You would be too, if it happened to you."
-- Leslie Gore

46 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:55:35pm

re: #40 Le_Patriot

re: #31 newsjunkie_ky


re: #21 Nevergiveup

re: #15 Le_Patriot

Would this be considered bad timing to post?

Were can I buy one?

Is that a bobblehead?

___
Bobblehead, yes.
Dare not sell in store...they keel you !

Jeff Dunham needs to do a bobblehead of Achmed that says, "silence" and "I keeel you".
I have an Ozzy bobblehead I love.

47 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:55:42pm

re: #42 Orde

grossly disingenuous and shamefully ignorant

That sums up the PC Dhimmi crowd perfectly

48 MagnaniomousCoward  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:56:17pm

Here are the videos all zipped up and downloadable. Note that I haven't actually watched them yet so I don't know if I agree with the guy and so on... http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DLN1IJKS


re: #18 WrathofG-d
If you want rude dudes, watch this, starting at 1:34:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FSuMt9LcOE

49 Sean  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:56:25pm

This is the type of government oppression that causes a revolution.

50 tabitharuth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:56:33pm

Here are Levant's opening comments if you can't access the video.
Opening remarks

51 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:56:52pm

re: #45 winslow

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Obnoxious, arrogant and rude.

"You would be too, if it happened to you."
-- Leslie Gore

Excellent!
/Mr. Burns.

52 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:57:31pm

re: #42 Orde

I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.

He refuses to play their PC fake game.

53 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:57:49pm

re: #43 Nevergiveup

Incidentally, no has ever, ever, ever been found "not guilty" by these ass clowns.

No one. You think they are going to let the Jew off?

54 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:58:27pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Wrath, I so often agree with you and your insights, but not today. He is incredulous, not rude.
And the asshat lefty on the left can't tolerate his truth -- she rolls her eyes, crosses her arms and feels as if she is being attacked by a one of the unwashed masses who will not do as she says, never mind what she does. There is a reason Canada exists: they are what's left of the Tories and other Monarchists who had no stomach for liberty and its price. Fuck her and her kangaroo court arrogance.

55 dammad  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:58:30pm

I thought he was brilliant. I would be obnoxious and rude as well if my country was trying to take away my freedom of speech. She had all the body language of every liberal I know...the superiority and disbelief at this neanderthal racist/bigot/mustbeaconservative guy.

56 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:59:26pm

re: #52 debutaunt

re: #42 Orde

I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.

He refuses to play their PC fake game.

Unfortunately it is not a game. These PC "human rights panels' can ruin peoples lives. Luckily Mr. Levant appears to the were with all to give it as good as he gets it.

57 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 12:59:49pm

Charles? I think you want "Inquisitor" in the description of the second segment.

58 gunjam  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:00:06pm

re: #6 WhiteRasta

Thank you Charles for exposing the kangaroo court of Canada.

This is a stinking disgrace.

Steyn is next!

Amen to that. It would appear that Canadian authorities need to be purged ASAP.

59 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:00:44pm

re: #53 WhiteRasta

re: #43 Nevergiveup

Incidentally, no has ever, ever, ever been found "not guilty" by these ass clowns.

No one. You think they are going to let the Jew off?

Well that pretty much says it all. It sounds like the Human rights Council in NYC.

60 CmdrGuard  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:00:49pm

Wow. I want this man to come to my campus, and other college campus all over the US to speak. His eloquent use of language needs to be projected to every dark corner of western civilization where moral relativism and subservient multiculturalism are gaining ground.

61 Stringart  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:16pm

"To publish whatever the hell we want no matter what the hell you think"

Free speech in a nutshell.

62 addie  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:27pm

Very informative. Thanks Charles for keeping us informed

63 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:30pm

How many honor-killing, seeing-eye-dog rejecting, Muslim men will be hauled before this inquisition?

///Cricket Chorus™

64 Mambo Bananapatch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:34pm

re: #49 Sean

This is the type of government oppression that causes a revolution.

I sure hope you're right.

Mark Steyn -- who is also facing a date with the HRC -- wrote words to the effect that a man who is going over Niagara Falls meets his doom not when he gets to the precipice, but at the moment he gets caught in the current, when he doesn't realize he's out of time.

If we don't act soon we'll be too late, even if it doesn't seem like it.

65 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:47pm

re: #57 Dianna

Charles? I think you want "Inquisitor" in the description of the second segment.

Full title.
Grand Inquisitor of Secular Office of Inquisition.

66 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:01:49pm

Her bias and what the subsequent outcome will be is very telling by when she chooses to take notes.

67 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:02:06pm

re: #56 Nevergiveup

re: #52 debutaunt


re: #42 Orde

I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.

He refuses to play their PC fake game.

Unfortunately it is not a game. These PC "human rights panels' can ruin peoples lives. Luckily Mr. Levant appears to the were with all to give it as good as he gets it.

She's desperately trying to plot a way to give him the highest sentence she can. Separation of mosque and state indeed!

68 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:02:50pm

re: #62 addie

Addie, why did you wait so long to post?! You been a lurker?

69 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:04:40pm

re: #65 jcm

re: #57 Dianna


Charles? I think you want "Inquisitor" in the description of the second segment.

Full title.
Grand Inquisitor of Secular Office of Inquisition.

There's no zzzing to it. Where's Mandy when we need her?

(Why not 7 keyboards instead of a paltry 6? Whizzed through last night and caught that one! *giggle*)

70 Killian Bundy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:04:51pm

Palestinian gunmen attack school in Gaza

Palestinian gunmen stormed the American International School in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip on Saturday, smashing windows, seizing computers and torching buses but causing no injuries, security sources said.

In a leaflet left behind after the attack, the gunmen claimed affiliation with al Qaeda and vowed to attack other symbols of "immorality" throughout the coastal territory.

/that's right, education is immoral in Islam

71 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:05:20pm

Are there transcripts of the other two videos?

72 Shay4l  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:05:23pm

Bless our brilliant Founding Fathers and their wisdom. At least there's a high chance of protecting yourself against this and other similar outrages.

73 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:05:47pm

re: #70 Killian Bundy

Palestinian gunmen attack school in Gaza

Palestinian gunmen stormed the American International School in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip on Saturday, smashing windows, seizing computers and torching buses but causing no injuries, security sources said.

In a leaflet left behind after the attack, the gunmen claimed affiliation with al Qaeda and vowed to attack other symbols of "immorality" throughout the coastal territory.

/that's right, education is immoral in Islam

So is the word "American"!

74 Just Another Four-letter Word  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:06:11pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

Who says he's "arrogant and obnoxious"? I would call it righteous indignation, and he's spitting right back in the Human Wrongs Commission's face - this is exactly what they deserve!

Bad call, WoG.

JAFLW

75 jimboster  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:06:35pm

It looks good, but I can't hear a word they're saying.

76 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:09pm

Is anybody else watching the whole thing again?
I'm halfway through my second go-around.

I might watch it again.

and again.

77 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:27pm

re: #58 gunjam

We have a minority conservative government in power right now, but we Canucks will soon return to our senses and vote in the |Liberals next election.

Alberta is the last bastion of conservatism in this country.

Even liberals have to have a job, the only thing they can do is be a human rights inquisitor. It's not like it's a real job like being a doctor or teacher.

78 SouthTexas  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:28pm

Stay tuned: Coming to a courtroom near you!

79 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:30pm

How dare she invoke 9/11.

80 Sean  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:34pm

re: #64 Mambo Bananapatch

Have you ever known of a totalitarian government that could stand up forever?


Joseph Powers (Wherever you are) I was right. You were wrong. The USSR fell. The Berlin Wall fell. China's maoists will fall.

Because freedom is more fun.

81 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:40pm

re: #69 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Talk about Great Galloping Gramscian Whores of the Caliphate™. The lefty is one of their foot soldiers, if not one of the whores.

82 Just Another Four-letter Word  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:07:54pm

re: #32 Orde

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Sorry, not seeing any arrogance or rudeness whatsoever, but detail-filled, fact-based justified righteous indignation. (I just completed video one so far.)

It would seem others would agree with me - righteous indignation is the proper attitude, methinks.

JAFLW

83 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:08:04pm

Canada is semi-free right now.

Ft. Drum is a bout 12 hours -- by M1 -- away.

84 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:08:28pm

re: #75 jimboster

It looks good, but I can't hear a word they're saying.

Pump up the volume.

/gangsta

85 tripster  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:08:32pm

Just finished video one. Loved it.

Favorite line of many:

You may start your interrogation!
86 Mambo Bananapatch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:08:42pm

re: #71 Dianna

The only transcript I can find is at Levant's blog:

Opening statement

87 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:08:43pm

I'm embarrassed to be a member of the same species as that woman. If she had an ounce of either courage or sense she would have stood at the end of the opening statement, said "You're absolutely right; I'm outta here."

An outrage, and Levant has been rather remarkably restrained, I'd say. Can we vote for him for President - even if he can't serve, he's better than anything we've got running right now!

88 antishock8  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:09:49pm

This is...

AWESOME!

Thank god someone has the nuts to stand up to this bullshit!

89 soldiers.dad  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:10:22pm

Well, maybe Youtube has silenced him.
I can't hear a thing in these video's, and I have the volume turned up all the way.
Whats up with the sound?

90 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:10:48pm

When he speaks of the process itself being the punishment, I was reminded of all the clinton "enemies" who ended up miraculously getting audited by the IRS. The islamists learned well to use the bureaucracy against the citizenry.

91 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:10:54pm

re: #87 AuldTrafford

Re "restraint" and "civility" two threads back, I'd say Levant's use of "bloody" was rather appropriate. Classic! Loved it!

92 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:11:46pm

re: #91 pre-Boomer Marine brat

re: #87 AuldTrafford

Re "restraint" and "civility" two threads back, I'd say Levant's use of "bloody" was rather appropriate. Classic! Loved it!

Spot on!

93 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:11:59pm

British and Canadian D-Day landings Normandy

94 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:12:03pm

Helps if I right click on my Sound icon and bump up the WAVE setting.

95 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:12:05pm

re: #72 Shay4l

Did you go over and read Levant's statement? Canada's fundamental laws express the same guarantees! Not, of course, that the hrc is listening, or cares.

96 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:13:02pm

re: #92 AuldTrafford

:-D
Figured a Brit would get that (and I ain't one)!

97 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:13:23pm

re: #75 jimboster

There's a link to the opening statement: Kangaroo Court, he says

98 kayawanee  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:13:27pm

re: #13 newsjunkie_ky

No doubt. Check out the body language. At one point, she crosses her arms in such as way as to SCREAM her annoyance at him. Canada is lost. Let's just make sure no group like that ever gets this kind of power in the U.S. G-d help us all.

Oh, and hello Lizards!

99 tripster  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:13:38pm

Interrogator: What is the intent and purpose of your article?

Levant: Why is that a relevant question? .. We publish what ever we want as free Albertans.. no matter whatever the hell you think...

Loving this!

100 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:14:28pm

re: #86 Mambo Bananapatch

Yeah, I read that, thanks! I'm hoping - because, like some others, I can't really hear what's being said - for transcripts of the second and third clips.

101 philly_being_philly  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:14:36pm

re: #85 tripster

Just finished video one. Loved it.

Favorite line of many:


You may start your interrogation!

Sent shivers up my spine.

102 sbmama  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:14:45pm

Watching this, I thought I was seeing Nurse Ratchit. It struck me that she was more interested in the tender sensibilities of those who kill or advocate killing than in those who would be their targets. I say, shame on those who are so blinded by moral equivalence. And three cheers for Ezra Levant! I so admire his courage in standing up to small-minded bureaucrats like this lady. I'm going to subscribe to his magazine just to support him. I admire balls.

103 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:14:50pm

Levant nailed it right here.

This commission is applying Saudi values, not Canadian values.

104 sonofsheldon  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:16:09pm

Between Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn, these fascist, left-wing, Big Brother-wannabees at the Canadian Human Rights Commission may wish to go after smaller thought criminals in the future. Bullies don't like it when the intended victim is brave and strong enough to fight back.

105 gunjam  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:16:10pm

re: #77 WhiteRasta

re: #58 gunjam

We have a minority conservative government in power right now, but we Canucks will soon return to our senses and vote in the |Liberals next election.

Alberta is the last bastion of conservatism in this country.

Even liberals have to have a job, the only thing they can do is be a human rights inquisitor. It's not like it's a real job like being a doctor or teacher.

I have a (conservative) Canadian friend who talks like you do. What a tragedy the moonbats have so much power there.

The speaker in this video is inspiring for his unwillingness to compromise his (erstwhile?) liberties one iota: A lot of Americans who are willing at times to compromise their principles to get along could learn a great deal from him. His eloquence and logic are only exceeded by his moral indignation and his courage.

106 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:16:21pm

re: #96 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Nor am I, but I know "bloody" is no mild term. Strong stuff, in fact.

107 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:16:25pm

re: #69 pre-Boomer Marine brat

I buy keyboards by the case since registering at LGF.

I actually got one of the kludge things built and shipped to the fab on Friday.

Seattle v. Green Bay kicks off shortly.

108 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:16:27pm

Man, I hope there is going to be one huge uproar about this BS.

There will be no mention of this in the Communist Broadcasting Service, for sure.

109 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:17:35pm
It's not these cartoons that create hatred, it's radical muslims who blow things up, who torch my synagogue, who file these nuisance lawsuits who create hatred.
110 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:17:48pm

re: #107 jcm

MY OWN KEYBOARD!
ARRRGGGHHH!

111 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:17:49pm

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?

112 Simple Voice  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:17:56pm

I think we have a winner for 2008's Fallaci Award!
Man, talk about a beat down.
In the 1st clip, I love the defensive body language of the HRC stooge.

113 Sunlight  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:18:21pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

He's mad. It comes up later. His synagogue got firebombed. Ours only got post-its with swastikas on them all over the front. And I was mad. I can't imagine a firebomb.

114 ajackson  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:18:30pm

Yesterday I was listening to Jonah Goldberg (on the excellent Instapundit podcast) talk about 'liberal fascism'. Today I got to see it (via YouTube video) in action.

115 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:18:34pm

re: #98 kayawanee

Canada is lost

She absolutely is not. Many men gearing up right now.

Frigates are in good shape.

Strait of Hormuz is going to be a tough job. Bigger question is whether US is up to it?

116 markie  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:18:45pm
Nobody expected a kind of Spanish Inquisition...
117 christheprofessor  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:19:07pm

Now that's a bitch-slapping for the ages, I tells ya! You GO, Ezra!

118 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:19:43pm

re: #107 jcm

Down to trivial stuff ... one of the kludge things must refer to the 5-year-old project. Correct? If so, great. I hope it works.

119 cardiacmont  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:06pm

Levant is a fricking hero, and I don't toss the word 'hero' around lightly.

120 JimmyTheClaw  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:06pm

A man was in a long line at Wal-Mart. As he got to the register he realized he had forgotten to get condoms, so he asked the checkout girl if she could have some brought up to the register.

She asked, 'What size condoms?'

The customer replied that he didn't know. She asked him to drop his pants. He did.

She reached over the counter, grabbed hold of him and called over the intercom, 'One box of large condoms, Register 5.'

The next man in line thought this was interesting, and like most of us, was up for a cheap thrill.

When he got up to the register, he told the checker that he too had forgotten to get condoms, and asked if she could have some
brought to the register for him.

She asked him what size, and he stated that he didn't know. She asked him to drop his pants. He did.

She gave him a quick feel, picked up the intercom and said, 'One box of medium-sized condoms, Register 5.'

A few customers back was this teenage boy. He thought what he had seen was way too cool. He had never had any type of sexual contact with a live female, so he thought this was his chance.

When he got to the register he told the checker he needed some condoms.

She asked him what size and he said he didn't know.? She asked him to drop his pants and he did. She reached over the counter, ga ve him a quick squeeze, then picked up the intercom and said...

(you'll love this one...)


'Cleanup, Register 5'

121 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:14pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

It's funny you say that because arrogant and obnoxious is what his friends and enemies alike say about him. I personally know Ezra and that is exactly how I would describe him.

I also like him very much.

122 saberry0530  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:20pm

Dear Canadian Human Rights Commision,

WHat am I thinking now?
A few hints..
First one... it involves a town in Mexico... begins with a "t"
Second one ... a beast of burden
Third one ... What happens when circle A in inserted in slot B.


GIve up?

Its called 'GO F YOURSELF"

123 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:25pm

I hope someone here will send a link of this thread to the Kangaroo Court of Alberta...

I won't because I live here and am afraid they might track me down.

(Where is my tinfoil hat?)

124 Simple Voice  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:38pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

WTF?
Look up the word indignant.

125 tripster  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:20:52pm

Levant:

The saudi trained iman complaining that I offended the prophet mohammad, well he's dead by the way, so I don't think I offended him.

But I reserve the right to do what I'm accused of..

I am so enjoying this guy and how he is slamming this back in their face.

126 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:22:11pm

re: #67 debutaunt

re: #56 Nevergiveup

re: #52 debutaunt


re: #42 Orde


I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.


He refuses to play their PC fake game.


Unfortunately it is not a game. These PC "human rights panels' can ruin peoples lives. Luckily Mr. Levant appears to the were with all to give it as good as he gets it.

She's desperately trying to plot a way to give him the highest sentence she can. Separation of mosque and state indeed!

This abuse of power by the Canadian government is breathtaking. Vile government abuse of the people is what our founding fathers were intending to prevent with the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

I love his passion. I love how articulate he is. I love how he brings up all these miserable examples (in the third video) of violent behavior by Islamists in Alberta, including the torching of this own mosque by a "fool" who accidentally doused himself with the gasoline, then while rolling around on the ground, allowed his cell phone to fall out on to the ground, so the police were able to track him down. "This is what causes the people to hate Islam."

let's not forget that Mark Steyn is now in court being persecuted by the thought police. These cases will cause an enormous backlash against Islam, I predict.

127 sonofsheldon  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:22:44pm

re: #53 WhiteRasta

Incidentally, no has ever, ever, ever been found "not guilty" by these ass clowns.

I read that too, I believe in a Mark Steyn column, which I can't seem to find right now.

128 markie  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:22:56pm

re: #21 Nevergiveup

re: #15 Le_Patriot

Would this be considered bad timing to post?

Were can I buy one?

That came out awhile back. Long sold out the original run. Hopefully there are more.

129 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:23:29pm

re: #121 latitude51

re: #18 WrathofG-d


Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.


It's funny you say that because arrogant and obnoxious is what his friends and enemies alike say about him. I personally know Ezra and that is exactly how I would describe him.

I also like him very much.

I think I like him, too, but I think arrogance and "obnoxiousness" (is that a word?) are words that apply to conduct which is less than appropriate. So, I don't think those words don't apply here.

130 kayawanee  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:23:33pm

re: #115 Pro-Bush Canuck

I'm not talking about your military might, nor your political will to fight outside your borders. I'm referring to what's going on in the HRC. This is truly sick. In the U.S., most of these types of kangeroo courts are found in universities with limited jurisdiction. And with lawyers from F.I.R.E., we're starting to turn that around here.

Good luck with your battles.

131 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:23:46pm

re: #99 tripster

Interrogator: What is the intent and purpose of your article?

Levant: Why is that a relevant question? .. We publish what ever we want as free Albertans.. no matter whatever the hell you think...

Loving this!

This is the majesty of our civilization: that millions can see a lone individual take on the shabby charade of justice that is the Canadian "human rights" commission.

I am so inspired.

132 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:23:47pm

re: #118 pre-Boomer Marine brat

re: #107 jcm

Down to trivial stuff ... one of the kludge things must refer to the 5-year-old project. Correct? If so, great. I hope it works.

Pretty close. Goes back to a manager who was penny wise and pound foolish. Long story, but I been digging out of the hole for a while and my new managers support the effort. They don't blink we I tell 'em I need a $50K O-scope.

133 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:24:07pm

If this wasn't so serious it would be funny. I've never seen such a mismatch of morals and wit.

134 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:24:18pm

re: #129 AuldTrafford

re: #121 latitude51

re: #18 WrathofG-d


Ok, this guy is a bit rude.I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.


It's funny you say that because arrogant and obnoxious is what his friends and enemies alike say about him. I personally know Ezra and that is exactly how I would describe him.I also like him very much.

I think I like him, too, but I think arrogance and "obnoxiousness" (is that a word?) are words that apply to conduct which is less than appropriate. So, I don't think those words don't apply here.

It's passion and justifiable contempt.

135 markie  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:24:25pm

re: #120 JimmyTheClaw

Thats a great joke, but the wrong venue...

136 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:24:37pm

re: #129 AuldTrafford

Double negative, anyone. Please disregard one of the "don't"s.

137 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:24:54pm

re: #121 latitude51

Very interesting. Thanks very much.

That said, I'll leave my #41 and #91 still standing.

138 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:25:16pm

re: #133 Killgore Trout

If this wasn't so serious it would be funny. I've never seen such a mismatch of morals and wit.

I would feel humiliated and embarrassed for her, except that they all deserve every word he speaks.

139 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:25:34pm

re: #130 kayawanee

re: #115 Pro-Bush Canuck

I'm not talking about your military might, nor your political will to fight outside your borders. I'm referring to what's going on in the HRC. This is truly sick. In the U.S., most of these types of kangeroo courts are found in universities with limited jurisdiction. And with lawyers from F.I.R.E., we're starting to turn that around here.

Good luck with your battles.

You think I lie it any more than you do.

It disgusts me.

140 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:26:44pm

re: #139 Pro-Bush Canuck

re: #130 kayawanee

re: #115 Pro-Bush Canuck

I'm not talking about your military might, nor your political will to fight outside your borders. I'm referring to what's going on in the HRC. This is truly sick. In the U.S., most of these types of kangeroo courts are found in universities with limited jurisdiction. And with lawyers from F.I.R.E., we're starting to turn that around here.

Good luck with your battles.

You think I lie it any more than you do.

It disgusts me.

PIMF: You think I like it any more than you do?

Sorry on phone :-)

141 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:26:47pm

re: #133 Killgore Trout

LOL!

142 Stringart  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:27:00pm

re: #111 Nevergiveup

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?

Yes. I'm a little hazy on the specifics but a man in Saskatchewan was found guilty (shocka) by the HRC for placing an ad in a newspaper listing, not the complete text, but just the chapter and verse numbers of Bible passages condemning homosexuality. About 6 years later, his "conviction" was overturned in appellate court. Of course, by then the damage was done. Like your friend, he paid a huge cost emotionally and financially.

143 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:27:56pm

re: #137 pre-Boomer Marine brat

re: #121 latitude51

Very interesting. Thanks very much.

That said, I'll leave my #41 and #91 still standing.

And I should mention that I support him 100%

144 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:28:02pm

The human rights thingy must be at home, wondering what the hell just ran over her...

145 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:28:23pm

re: #111 Nevergiveup

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?

Guilty for what pray tell?

146 USASupport  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:28:40pm

This is outrageous. I hope this organization is disassembled by the end of all this.

147 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:29:44pm

re: #53 WhiteRasta

re: #43 Nevergiveup

Incidentally, no has ever, ever, ever been found "not guilty" by these ass clowns.

No one. You think they are going to let the Jew off?

Where can we send the real deserving hate-mail to the Human Right's Commission?

148 grumpy old codger  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:29:57pm

re: #83 Pro-Bush Canuck
We'll give you sanctuary, ProB C!

149 winston06  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:30:38pm

America will be just like Canada if Hitlery or Osama are elected...

150 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:30:44pm

re: #132 jcm

re: #118 pre-Boomer Marine brat


re: #107 jcm

Down to trivial stuff ... one of the kludge things must refer to the 5-year-old project. Correct? If so, great. I hope it works.


Pretty close. Goes back to a manager who was penny wise and pound foolish. Long story, but I been digging out of the hole for a while and my new managers support the effort. They don't blink we I tell 'em I need a $50K O-scope.

Given the circumstances, sounds like you couldn't ask for much more.

(Any chance of getting "Dilbert's boss's" head on a pike? .. just kidding)

151 JimmyTheClaw  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:30:48pm

MUSCULAR CONTRACTIONS
> >
> > A Professor was giving a lecture on 'Involuntary Muscular Contractions'
> >
> > To his first year medical students .
> >
> > Realizing that this was not the most riveting subject, the Professor decided to lighten the mood slightly. He pointed to a young woman in the front row and said,
> >
> > 'Do you know what your ass hole is doing while you're having an orgasm?'
> >
> > She replied, 'Probably deer hunting with his buddies."
> > The professor laughed so hard he could not continue with the class

152 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:31:08pm

re: #138 DistantThunder


I would feel humiliated and embarrassed for her, except that they all deserve every word he speaks.


I agree they deserve every bit of ridicule and humiliation. In fact they need, it's they only way they're going to change.

153 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:31:11pm

BTW, It's a human right to be an idiot.
Give it a read lizards.

[Link: www.nationalpost.com...]

154 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:31:18pm

re: #23 Shug

Is it possible we are seeing the 2008 Fiskie and fallacci award winners at the same table?

Shug -

A Fallacci nomination for Mr. Levant for sure. AND a demonstration of
why we in the US should fight tooth and nail against "Hate Speech" laws.
We often forget that the First Amendment is unique to the US. The rest of the "Anglosphere" is close - though Not Quite - as these clips show.

-S-

155 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:32:07pm

re: #148 grumpy old codger

re: #83 Pro-Bush Canuck
We'll give you sanctuary, ProB C!

Normally not a big deal. But youngsters are going back into the field.

Soon, we hope.

/Iran is not ready for nukes

156 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:32:32pm

re: #142 Stringart

In Manitoba a bunch of gay rights activists went to a printer and wanted some printing done to promote some gay event.

The guy refused to do any work for them, so instead of taking their business elsewhere, they took him to human rights court and he was fined.

It sounded like some kind of set-up job to me. Seemed they wanted to ruin this guy for some reason.

Fer crying out loud, be a grown up and take your business elsewhere.

157 kayawanee  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:32:42pm

re: #139 Pro-Bush Canuck

You think I (sic) lie it any more than you do. It disgusts me.

I'm sure it does. You have my sympathy. I hope for your sake, that something can be done to turn it around. Maybe the publicity of this interrogation or the Steyn interrogation will be a turning point for this Orwellian nightmare Canada is experiencing.

I hope for our sake, that we can prevent such groups from ever gaining the kind of power in the U.S. that they seem to wield in Canada.

158 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:32:51pm

re: #37 Shug

re: #29 racecardriver

Charles, thank you.

This is the most important and relevant post you've put up in the last 5 years, imo.

all I can say is "wow".


I couldn't agree more.

re: #54 Gang of One

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Wrath, I so often agree with you and your insights, but not today. He is incredulous, not rude.
And the asshat lefty on the left can't tolerate his truth -- she rolls her eyes, crosses her arms and feels as if she is being attacked by a one of the unwashed masses who will not do as she says, never mind what she does. There is a reason Canada exists: they are what's left of the Tories and other Monarchists who had no stomach for liberty and its price. Fuck her and her kangaroo court arrogance.

Soldiers of any type on the front lines, are a different "breed" than the average person. They have fought more hard battles, and they have the scars to prove it. That ego strength is what makes them leaders in a way that very few politicians are.

159 princetrumpet  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:33:45pm

Sensational, heartfelt, and passionate oratory. My admiration for his fight is immense and I wish him the best of luck with all this nonsense and thank him for the incidental lesson in civics.

160 jjmckay1216  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:34:57pm

cool snowing in green bay should be quite a game for #4

161 descolada9  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:35:03pm

I hereby nominate Ezra Levant for the next round of Fallacy awards. To think that Mumia Abu Jamal has streets named after him in Europe when people like Mr. Levant are being persecuted like this makes me wanna retch. If it is possible to nominate the names of streets in your community, I would strongly suggest you put in a word for Ezra Levant Way.

As for that woman in the interviews, oh, yes, I know her type. She's one of those sanctimonious types who don't want to hear what you have to say. They are on a personal crusade and God be damned. She is out to show you what for because she has the power to do so and failing to surrender to the proper PC attitude will only make things harsher on you. 1984 isn't in our past, folks, it is everywhere among us all the time.

162 eff plus  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:35:14pm

Haha, brilliant. HRC = shredded. I wish I were as articulate as Ezra, but I'm not, so I'll just add SCREW THE HRC!

163 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:35:39pm

re: #145 DistantThunder

re: #111 Nevergiveup

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?

Guilty for what pray tell?

A patient called him and told him he had AIDS ( which by the way was diagnosed because my friend noticed suspicious sores and referred him to a specialist ). He asked my friend ( a Dentist ) if he felt uncomfortable treating him. My friend said yes , but he was still his patient and he WOULD continue to treat him. The human rights commission ruled that answering a direct question honestly was discriminatory. The NY State Supreme Court basically said that was absurd and threw the case out with a scathing rebuke to the commission.

164 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:36:03pm

re: #156 WhiteRasta

re: #142 Stringart

In Manitoba a bunch of gay rights activists went to a printer and wanted some printing done to promote some gay event.

The guy refused to do any work for them, so instead of taking their business elsewhere, they took him to human rights court and he was fined.

It sounded like some kind of set-up job to me. Seemed they wanted to ruin this guy for some reason.

Fer crying out loud, be a grown up and take your business elsewhere.

You suppose a gay printer would print up a bunch of evangelical material that deals with scriptural details about homosexuality?

165 tripster  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:36:05pm

More Levant:

"...What kind of clown says he represents the supreme council of islam? It's a part time job for him. It's a hobby. He has a real job downtown at IBM. His grandiose title. He doesn't speak for islam..."

Still loving this smack down. Way to not stand down for what is right against the tyranny of a corrupt government.

This is truly speaking truth to power.

166 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:36:38pm

re: #153 latitude51

BTW, It's a human right to be an idiot.
Give it a read lizards.

[Link: www.nationalpost.com...]

Great! Thank you!

167 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:37:39pm

In islamic countries, the islamists threaten violence and carry out violence as an example for others to stay within islamist bounds.

In the West, however, threatening violence can in and of itself be considered a crime. What's an islamist to do? Why- they can turn to lawsuits, and sue their critics into silence. To them, Mr. Levant is the example to serve for others- do as he did and we'll sue you or otherwise legally harass you into silence, too.

Even if Mr. Levant wins, the islamists may already have victory if others have been or will be intimidated into keeping criticisms of islam to themselves.

168 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:38:21pm

re: #163 Nevergiveup

re: #145 DistantThunder

re: #111 Nevergiveup

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?

Guilty for what pray tell?

A patient called him and told him he had AIDS ( which by the way was diagnosed because my friend noticed suspicious sores and referred him to a specialist ). He asked my friend ( a Dentist ) if he felt uncomfortable treating him. My friend said yes , but he was still his patient and he WOULD continue to treat him. The human rights commission ruled that answering a direct question honestly was discriminatory. The NY State Supreme Court basically said that was absurd and threw the case out with a scathing rebuke to the commission.

Of course that makes me distain the guy with AIDS who could be such a demented moron to take action like that.

169 leap_frog  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:39:05pm
re: #6 WhiteRasta

Thank you Charles for exposing the kangaroo court of Canada.

This is a stinking disgrace.

Steyn is next!

Here, here.

As one who as been denied justice by this type of bureaucratic asinine "thought" policing gang, thank you Charles. Unfortunately they invade every aspect of our legal system as well. Criminals are valued over any victim of crime up here.

The real name should be: Canadian Human Rights Denied Goon Squads.

170 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:39:09pm

TD Seattle!

171 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:39:33pm

Here is a link to the Alberta human rights commission:

[Link: www.albertahumanrights.ab.ca...]

If any Lizards would care to contact them, please don't be abusive and come across like a loony.

Send them a link to this thread. Bwwaahahahah.

The Lizard Army is everywhere...

172 themaninthestripedsuit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:39:42pm

The Straight Dope on "Bloody" as profanity

"In foul language, a vague epithet expressing anger, resentment, but often a mere intensive, especially with a negative -- as, not a bloody one." They cite an 1840s usage.

173 Hawaiian cocoNUT  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:40:03pm

When I looked at the interrogator I couldn't help it but thinking Hillary Clinton! (No, not the blond hair or the pants suit!)

174 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:40:27pm

re: #165 tripster

More Levant:

"...What kind of clown says he represents the supreme council of islam? It's a part time job for him. It's a hobby. He has a real job downtown at IBM. His grandiose title. He doesn't speak for islam..."

Still loving this smack down. Way to not stand down for what is right against the tyranny of a corrupt government.

This is truly speaking truth to power.

I would speculate that these Imam's who do this have personality disorders: extremely narcissistic, power hungry, controlling, self-pitying, arrogant, and hostile.

See how well all this publicity is working out for them?

175 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:41:05pm

re: #169 leap_frog

re: #6 WhiteRasta Thank you Charles for exposing the kangaroo court of Canada.

This is a stinking disgrace.

Steyn is next!

Here, here.

As one who as been denied justice by this type of bureaucratic asinine "thought" policing gang, thank you Charles. Unfortunately they invade every aspect of our legal system as well. Criminals are valued over any victim of crime up here.

The real name should be: Canadian Human Rights Denied Goon Squads.

Time for a REVOLUTION by the People for the PEOPLE

176 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:41:28pm

Is congress trying to repeal or pass the 'fairness doctrine'?
Thanks in advance for the help.

177 Syrah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:41:29pm

On the other hand, when Lionheart is in like forum asked if he is a supporter of the racialist BNP, he will be stuck responding "Yes, but . . . "

The Racialist are as much a threat to the anti-Jihad movement as are the Jihadis themselves.

178 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:41:44pm

re: #172 themaninthestripedsuit

The Straight Dope on "Bloody" as profanity

"In foul language, a vague epithet expressing anger, resentment, but often a mere intensive, especially with a negative -- as, not a bloody one." They cite an 1840s usage.

I think this depends upon the society. In England, I believe it is (or was) a pretty strong profanity. In this country, your definition is quite correct.

179 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:42:20pm

re: #164 DistantThunder

Probably not, as is his right to do as he pleases in his own business.

The customer should simply take his business elsewhere and not go whining to the government about his hurt "feelings".

180 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:42:38pm

re: #164 DistantThunder

re: #156 WhiteRasta


re: #142 Stringart

In Manitoba a bunch of gay rights activists went to a printer and wanted some printing done to promote some gay event.

The guy refused to do any work for them, so instead of taking their business elsewhere, they took him to human rights court and he was fined.

It sounded like some kind of set-up job to me. Seemed they wanted to ruin this guy for some reason.

Fer crying out loud, be a grown up and take your business elsewhere.


You suppose a gay printer would print up a bunch of evangelical material that deals with scriptural details about homosexuality?

Though I am personally opposed to homesexuality, a gay printer would/should have the exact same right of refusal. (See Levant, and and the op-ed linked in latitude51's #153.) Freedom has to be across-the-board.

181 Wind Rider  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:42:48pm

Hmmm. Excellent defense by Mr. Levant - my only criticism is allowing the term "racism" to creep into the discussion (along with his inclusion of the term Arab in the description of the synagogue fire bomber moron) - the point here is all about religion - not race.

Islam is not a race. It's a belief.

And as such...a valid target in the realm of the battle of ideas.

And absolutely, Mr. Levant owes neither the whining jihadists nor the government aparatchik participating in the farce anything but his contempt.

182 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:43:36pm

OMFG!* Ezra Levant is one serious bad-ass! If you ever find yourself in my neck of the woods Ezra, I'm buying you a drink.

*Before anyone chooses to be offended by that acronym, realize that it could mean anything you like. For instance: Orange-Mango Flavored Gobstoppers.

183 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:43:52pm

re: #167 Sharmuta

In islamic countries, the islamists threaten violence and carry out violence as an example for others to stay within islamist bounds.

In the West, however, threatening violence can in and of itself be considered a crime. What's an islamist to do? Why- they can turn to lawsuits, and sue their critics into silence. To them, Mr. Levant is the example to serve for others- do as he did and we'll sue you or otherwise legally harass you into silence, too.

Even if Mr. Levant wins, the islamists may already have victory if others have been or will be intimidated into keeping criticisms of islam to themselves.

So Mr. Levant needs to ultimately benefit in some way: a big book deal, a movie about the episode (I'd pay to see that in a heart beat), fame and fortune.

184 Jauhara al Kafirah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:43:54pm

Is it possible to find a transcription of the entire thing? I read ezra's statement over at his blog, but it would be nice for those of us stuck in dal up hell to be able to at least read what the dozy bint had to say.

185 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:44:42pm

Second fumble in minutes! Seahawks recover again. Damn.

186 WindHorse  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:44:47pm

sweet... go seahawks

187 nyc redneck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:45:00pm

it's stunning to watch this sour, deranged, grotesque fucking toad sit there in all her presumed power actually looking w/ disdain at this man so obviously her superior. it's bitter horrid losers like this woman who know what's best for all of us. it's animal farm.

now, i'm going to yell and scream real loud.

188 big L  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:45:04pm

that is all great but when does Levant get out of jail?
/like what we care in USa matters to Hillary Rights Commision
oops Human rights commission.

189 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:45:13pm

re: #168 DistantThunder

I agree strongly.
*bite tongue in two*

190 leap_frog  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:45:18pm

re: #175 DistantThunder

In total agreement.

191 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:45:25pm

re: #185 ciaospirit

Second fumble in minutes! Seahawks recover again. Damn.

Yeah I know- weird- since it would seem to be packer weather?

192 Peter Verkooijen  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:47:00pm

re: #154 Dr. Shalit

re: #23 Shug
... AND a demonstration of why we in the US should fight tooth and nail against "Hate Speech" laws.
We often forget that the First Amendment is unique to the US. The rest of the "Anglosphere" is close - though Not Quite - as these clips show.

There's a "Human Rights Commission" in New York that's used for the same purposes.

193 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:47:12pm

re: #162 eff plus

Haha, brilliant. HRC = shredded. I wish I were as articulate as Ezra, but I'm not, so I'll just add SCREW THE HRC!


HRC = human rights commission
HRC = hillary rodham clinton
hhhmmm!

194 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:47:22pm

re: #180 pre-Boomer Marine brat

re: #164 DistantThunder

re: #156 WhiteRasta


re: #142 StringartIn Manitoba a bunch of gay rights activists went to a printer and wanted some printing done to promote some gay event.

The guy refused to do any work for them, so instead of taking their business elsewhere, they took him to human rights court and he was fined.

It sounded like some kind of set-up job to me. Seemed they wanted to ruin this guy for some reason.

Fer crying out loud, be a grown up and take your business elsewhere.


You suppose a gay printer would print up a bunch of evangelical material that deals with scriptural details about homosexuality?

Though I am personally opposed to homesexuality, a gay printer would/should have the exact same right of refusal. (See Levant, and and the op-ed linked in latitude51's #153.) Freedom has to be across-the-board.

I completely agree. I don't think a christian would turn the gay printer into the human rights commission. I think it would be just as likely for the gay printer to turn down the business, and we'd never hear about it. Now if the customer is gay, and wants business cards printed for this wallpapering company...then I think the printer would still have the right of refusal...but would be out of line to do it. The printer might never mention the reason, and they gay guy wouldn't know why he was refused service, but morally, it wouldn't be right.

195 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:47:54pm

re: #187 nyc redneck

it's stunning to watch this sour, deranged, grotesque fucking toad sit there in all her presumed power actually looking w/ disdain at this man so obviously her superior. it's bitter horrid losers like this woman who know what's best for all of us. it's animal farm.

now, i'm going to yell and scream real loud.

Makes me hate liberal women even more.

196 nextstopmars  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:48:33pm

I was acquainted with Ezra a few years ago. He's always been a bit of a smartass, he won't back down. He's just brilliant.

197 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:48:46pm

re: #161 descolada9

I hereby nominate Ezra Levant for the next round of Fallacy awards. .

actually I think the fallacy award should go to the Canadian HRC because their whole existence is a fallacy

198 A.W.  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:49:00pm

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." In american courts, and probably in normal canadian courts, you can file a motion to dismiss or demurrer, that literally says "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." Further, we require you to produce at least a little evidence to support all the elements of the crime or cause of action, or else face a motion for summary judgment,

If i was him, i would refuse to show up. "you have no authority over me and therefore your summons is unlawful." i would go to prison for my freedom of speech.

199 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:49:48pm

re: #109 Shug

It's not these cartoons that create hatred, it's radical muslims who blow things up, who torch my synagogue, who file these nuisance lawsuits who create hatred.

DUH!

200 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:50:34pm

re: #198 A.W.

I agree, but it's pretty tough actually to put the pedal to the metal when it's really your freedom on the line.

201 Pullus Iulius  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:51:05pm

If this is the kind of crap that Canada wants to be involved in, then Levant is definitely a man without a country. A message to the Canadian government: Time for a prisoner exchange. We'll gladly exchange you our camp full of righteous muslims, along with a throng of their agitated moonbat supporters, if we can have Levant here in the Land of the Free.

202 FrogMarch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:51:20pm

After listening to that - I can honestly say THERE ISN'T ANYONE BETTER THAN EZRA.

wow. Bravo.

Can I change my fiskie vote to the Canadian Human Rights Commission ?

Canadian Human Rights Commission = A pathetic pile of fascistic anti-free-speech Stalinist left-winger/Saudi/Radical Imam mindcrime control freaks. Hillary would be proud.

203 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:51:22pm

TD Seattle

204 Killian Bundy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:51:23pm

Touchdown!

/Seahawks 14-0

205 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:51:52pm

re: #198 A.W.

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." In american courts, and probably in normal canadian courts, you can file a motion to dismiss or demurrer, that literally says "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." Further, we require you to produce at least a little evidence to support all the elements of the crime or cause of action, or else face a motion for summary judgment,

If i was him, i would refuse to show up. "you have no authority over me and therefore your summons is unlawful." i would go to prison for my freedom of speech.

They may be true in US courts of law; However, complaints bought before Human Rights Commissions are very rarely dismissed. Furthermore these commissions are packed, packed I say, with the worst kind of liberal left wing wacko scum.

206 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:52:18pm

Green Bay - 0
Seattle - 14
1:14 into the game, 2 GB turnovers.

207 JammieWearingFool  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:52:40pm

Great start for Green Bay.

/

208 Attaboid  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:52:49pm

Wow! This guy is good. The "judge", clueless.

209 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:53:08pm

re: #207 JammieWearingFool

Great start for Green Bay.

/

What is the spread?

210 iChef  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:53:56pm

I would have loved to sat behind that guy and been a part of a "amen choir".

Levant: Why is that a relevant question? .. We publish what ever we want as free Albertans.. no matter whatever the hell you think...


AMEN BROTHER!

We need more Levants that call BS, BS and do not mence their words.

211 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:54:03pm

re: #205 Nevergiveup

.."Furthermore these commissions are packed, packed I say, with the worst kind of liberal left wing wacko scum..."

Well even wackos have to have a job...Even if its a job being a professional parasite.

212 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:54:09pm

re: #204 Killian Bundy

Touchdown!

/Seahawks 14-0

Booo.

213 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:54:20pm

re: #209 Nevergiveup

re: #207 JammieWearingFool

Great start for Green Bay.

/

What is the spread?

8 points to Green Bay.

214 JammieWearingFool  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:54:38pm

re: #209 Nevergiveup

re: #207 JammieWearingFool

Great start for Green Bay.

/

What is the spread?

Seattle's getting 8.

I picked GB 30-27. Not looking good.

215 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:54:58pm

Later, Lizards...Shalom.

216 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:55:49pm

re: #211 WhiteRasta

re: #205 Nevergiveup

.."Furthermore these commissions are packed, packed I say, with the worst kind of liberal left wing wacko scum..."

Well even wackos have to have a job...Even if its a job being a professional parasite.

Unfortunately that is what I thought the TSA is for?

217 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:56:04pm

re: #187 nyc redneck

it's stunning to watch this sour, deranged, grotesque fucking toad sit there in all her presumed power actually looking w/ disdain at this man so obviously her superior. it's bitter horrid losers like this woman who know what's best for all of us. it's animal farm.

now, i'm going to yell and scream real loud.

Great article today in the UK

Why Hillary Allowed BIll To Seduce Any Woman In Sight

Often, Bill would arrive at the Oval Office feeling buoyant, "almost whistling as he whipped through papers," recalled adviser David Gergen. Then the phone would ring and Hillary would be on the line.

"His mood would darken," wrote Gergen, "his attention wander, and hot words would spew out. Had we seen the outrageous things his enemies were saying about him now? Why was his staff screwing him again? What,I would wonder, had she said to him now?"

Even more disconcerting were Bill's evening phone calls - what Communications Director George Stephanopoulos called the "nightcap" - when Bill would chew out an adviser while Hillary was nearby.

"It was completely at odds with the emotional tenor of the relationship that person had with Bill," said one top official.

"It was vicious. When she walked out of the room, everything changed. Then the tone would change completely and he would say: 'Why don't you come over and watch football?'"

In meetings, Hillary's dissatisfaction could curdle the atmosphere when she directed her ire at his subordinates. "It was her way of saying to Bill: 'You are incompetent. Look at how your staff treats you,'" said White House adviser Robert Boorstin.

"Rather than insult Bill directly, she used the staff. People were scared of her because they knew she could chop off their testicles if she so chose. You did not cross Hillary."

Adviser David Gergen described how, with a dozen or so of her husband's aides gathered round, Hillary would let loose a tirade. "She would launch a deadly missile straight at [Bill's] heart and just before it hit, the missile would explode, the shrapnel hitting the staff."

Her vocabulary had a common theme: that the President's men were "wimps." Recalled one aide: "It was: 'You don't have balls, no guts.' The language was so striking. It seemed that every criticism was dual purpose and could apply to him, but at the last minute she didn't apply it to him."

218 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:56:05pm

re: #214 JammieWearingFool

I picked GB 30-27. Not looking good.

It's early.

219 AuldTrafford  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:56:17pm

Turning into a Seattle thread. Gotta go; wonderful afternoon - thank you, all.

Levant is a serious hero in this!

220 Bubbaman  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:56:36pm

Hey Charles,

Can we give him an honorary Fallaci Award? I mean it!

221 Dianna  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:56:38pm

This is not getting the house clean, so I will step out.

A transcript of the other two clips would still be really nice.

222 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:57:11pm

re: #205 Nevergiveup

re: #198 A.W.

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." In american courts, and probably in normal canadian courts, you can file a motion to dismiss or demurrer, that literally says "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." Further, we require you to produce at least a little evidence to support all the elements of the crime or cause of action, or else face a motion for summary judgment,

If i was him, i would refuse to show up. "you have no authority over me and therefore your summons is unlawful." i would go to prison for my freedom of speech.

They may be true in US courts of law; However, complaints bought before Human Rights Commissions are very rarely dismissed. Furthermore these commissions are packed, packed I say, with the worst kind of liberal left wing wacko scum.

"Who are those guys?" - Butch Cassidy

223 paybacktime  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:57:13pm

Someone should monitor the mosques for CAIR, Wahabbist, Islamofascist hate sermons, hate newsletters.

There is just cause based on the hate mosques like the Finsbury Park mosque which celebrated the acts of their "magnificent 19" of the 9/11 sneak attack on the US.

224 Olderthandirt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:57:15pm

Another Canadian to be proud of. While I'm an unabashed Yank of many long years, I've got Canadian Cousins who've fought in the GWOT and now their country is under attack itself from the Islamofascists. Hope Canada stands even taller in this fight because certainly individual Canadians like Mr. Ezra Levant do stand very tall and firm.

The way the UK is going, Canada might be one refuge for good Brits looking for a place with freedom and perhaps Canadians will maintain that freedom for many long years too. Here's hoping.

225 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:57:26pm

re: #216 Nevergiveup

No, you are mistaken. It's what the UN is for ...

226 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:57:41pm

re: #211 WhiteRasta

The parasite feeds on three things: Free Markets, Free Minds, and Free Men.

/been playing too many video games

227 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:58:49pm

TD Green Bay.

228 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:59:14pm

TD...GB

229 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 1:59:23pm

re: #225 WhiteRasta

re: #216 Nevergiveup

No, you are mistaken. It's what the UN is for ...

Pardon. You are definitely right!

230 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:00:21pm

re: #192 Peter Verkooijen

P-V -

So I see. Thanks for the heads up. Seems like the NY Commission is more concerned with perceived discrimination than speech still not a good way to go.

-S-

231 stevieray  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:00:38pm

OT

Go Pack!

And now back to the subject at hand.

232 Stringart  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:00:53pm

#202 FrogMarch


Can I change my fiskie vote to the Canadian Human Rights Commission ?

This is the exact reason why I voted them for the Fiskie, and Steyn for the Fallaci. HRCs are far more dangerous than some jerk who is on a cable network that no one watches.

233 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:01:21pm

I want to see a full length video - and I would hope and bet it would become one of the most famous videos of modern history.

234 FrogMarch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:01:22pm

Moral of the story:
Don't offend the holy prophet big-mo or the left-wing fascists will do what they do best - censor. Give a left-wing an excuse to censor and stomp on free speech -- and they will take it... Just like dangling drugs in front of an adict.

Leftiwng group-think is simple: do not offend any victim group that they deem a victim group. (and they get to chose what constitutes a victim group) Free speech stops and the door of the left-wing bureaucrat and their chosen victim babies. obey.

235 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:03:24pm

re: #198 A.W.

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law."

It sounded from Mr. Levant that some of these people are not judges, or even lawyers on these panels. I find it more offensive that this is even considered legal. The islamists need to realize they have the right to be offended but we have the right to offend. I really agreed with Levant when he asked who do they really harm. They're harming themselves.

This is a man who could use support for his free speech- I highly doubt you'll find this guy calling LGF names.

236 dr.mister  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:04:31pm

Ezra hit it out of the park. This guy deserves a Fallaci award no doubt. You could tell the Inquisitor had nowhere near the smarts to debate him. He shredded each of her questions with buzzsaw ferocity. I hope she felt psychically crushed by his righteous indignation.

THANK YOU Charles for continuing to expose the utter baselessness and useless (and downright harmful) idiotarianism of the vast, left-wing, thoughtcrime policing, PC conspiracy.

237 Bubbaman  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:05:19pm

Pack is coming back and it looked like they had stopped the Seahawks. - aw an offside penalty.

I'll bet half of those Seattle boys don't even remember what snow is.

238 lifeofthemind  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:05:40pm

He said that IBM is employing the idiot who brought this action? Does the employment contract have a clause about acting in a manner that harms the reputation of the employer? IBM needs to look into this. Their reputation is now at risk.

239 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:05:43pm

3rd down Hasselback sacked. Punting

240 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:05:46pm

I think this is going to be a great game. It has weather, a cheese head crowd, good offenses, and oh did I say football weather! Go Packers!

241 Billy Hank  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:06:03pm

Loved the contempt steaming from the Petite Inquisitorix. When Exra hit the "Saudi trained imam" line in the first video, it was like a dagger (where are you Sen. Shumer?), a dagger to her heart. She crossed her arms in rejection so fast to stop her hatred from bleeding out. You have only to watch her to know that Ezra would be boiled in oil if she has her way. I hope this gets wide coverage in Canada and maybe they will come to their senses. I do agree with other commenters, she is quite a Hillary.

242 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:06:53pm

I want an "I Hunt Idiotarians!" T-shirt and Bumpersticker

I just made that up!

243 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:06:55pm

re: #237 Bubbaman

Pack is coming back and it looked like they had stopped the Seahawks. - aw an offside penalty.

I'll bet half of those Seattle boys don't even remember what snow is.

Hey we get snow in Seattle. Half the drivers see a snow and drive into the closest ditch, saves the hassle of doing it latter.

244 pat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:07:15pm

Fascinating. it is clear that this woman believes there is a legal way to think and an illegal way. Sort of like the Russians used to imprison dissenters in mental hospitals under the supposition that dissenters were insane and a detriment to society.

I would like the same sort of questioning diected at any practicing Muslim.

245 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:07:23pm

re: #238 lifeofthemind

I nearly forgot that part. I won't be buying any IBM products until they clean house. Get to it, IBM!

246 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:07:34pm

re: #241 Billy Hank

Loved the contempt steaming from the Petite Inquisitorix. When Exra hit the "Saudi trained imam" line in the first video, it was like a dagger (where are you Sen. Shumer?), a dagger to her heart. She crossed her arms in rejection so fast to stop her hatred from bleeding out. You have only to watch her to know that Ezra would be boiled in oil if she has her way. I hope this gets wide coverage in Canada and maybe they will come to their senses. I do agree with other commenters, she is quite a Hillary.

You can bet that if it was a conversation she would have interrupted and liberal women are wont to do.

247 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:08:04pm

I'm not a "Green", but I think we can and should do some for these magnificent creatures before they're wiped out.

Spent the better part of a day at the San Diego zoo watching 'em last year.

/Sorry, way off-topic :-)

248 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:08:18pm

re: #241 Billy Hank

How exactly are you using the word Hilliary. As an adjective to be descriptive or as a verb: as in to do a Hilliary?

249 kayawanee  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:08:21pm

re: #243 jcm

Hey we get snow in Seattle. Half the drivers see a snow and drive into the closest ditch, saves the hassle of doing it latter.

LOL

250 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:08:35pm

re: #244 pat

Fascinating. it is clear that this woman believes there is a legal way to think and an illegal way. Sort of like the Russians used to imprison dissenters in mental hospitals under the supposition that dissenters were insane and a detriment to society.

I would like the same sort of questioning diected at any practicing Muslim.

Just questioning Muslims is considered a hate crime by the left.

251 FrogMarch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:08:45pm

Make sure to listen to the final tape. It's good.

252 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:09:14pm

re: #217 DistantThunder
What I don't understand is why the same crowd is now in her camp?
I had heard basically the same thing from a friend whose ad guy was bill's ad guy on the campaign. He said bill was so jovial then hill would walk in the room and the vein in bill's head would start to throb and his mood became dark.

253 JWM  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:09:20pm

Final score:

Levant: 1
Wormtongue: pwned

JWM

254 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:09:24pm

re: #250 DistantThunder

re: #244 pat

Fascinating. it is clear that this woman believes there is a legal way to think and an illegal way. Sort of like the Russians used to imprison dissenters in mental hospitals under the supposition that dissenters were insane and a detriment to society.

I would like the same sort of questioning diected at any practicing Muslim.

Just questioning Muslims is considered a hate crime by the left.

"used to"? It's happening right now with Putin's opposition.

255 sissyblue  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:09:26pm

Wooo Hooo! That was GREAT!

256 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:09:38pm

re: #240 Nevergiveup

I think this is going to be a great game. It has weather, a cheese head crowd, good offenses, and oh did I say football weather! Go Packers!

Muddy and slippery. Perfect.

257 leap_frog  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:10:48pm

Also, to me, she looks like she's pretending to write when Mr. Levant is speaking about the Synagogue bombing.

She really exposed her ignorance when she answered his logical question with the lame, 'ah well I have to take it all into consideration...blah blah crap!

AND why does SHE get to do that!?

The rule of law doesn't apply over her 'authority'. Her job grants her rights to ignore any 'other' Canadians rights in any capacity that she chooses, regardless of law?
This is Canada.

This pisses me off so much...

258 Mardukhai  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:10:58pm

The CBC called Levant a "right winger" -- he should file a grievance.

259 MrArchieBunker  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:11:24pm

I just got through watching all three videos. Without a doubt Mr. Levant is a real life hero. As several lizards noted, her body language said it all. Mr. Levant knows the appropriate way to deal with such a farcical attack is to attack the attacker. Never, ever embrace your accuser. Always fire into an ambush. This was really inspiring, and I'm a very cynical sort who doesn't inspire easily. Bravo!

260 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:11:25pm

re: #244 pat

Fascinating. it is clear that this woman believes there is a legal way to think and an illegal way. Sort of like the Russians used to imprison dissenters in mental hospitals under the supposition that dissenters were insane and a detriment to society.

I would like the same sort of questioning diected at any practicing Muslim.

Scary, ain't it?

261 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:11:49pm

re: #256 ciaospirit

re: #240 Nevergiveup

I think this is going to be a great game. It has weather, a cheese head crowd, good offenses, and oh did I say football weather! Go Packers!

Muddy and slippery. Perfect.

Snow pretty good. It's going pretty wild, 21 points in the first 5 minutes. Go Hawks!

262 lifeofthemind  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:12:27pm

re: #245 Slumbering Behemoth

re: #238 lifeofthemind

I nearly forgot that part. I won't be buying any IBM products until they clean house. Get to it, IBM!

Not calling for any secondary boycotts, they don't do any good anyway. It is reputation and publicity that matters. I'm confident that 95% of IBM management know nothing of this. If any lizards can get the word to them they may act.

263 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:12:57pm

re: #252 newsjunkie_ky

re: #217 DistantThunder
What I don't understand is why the same crowd is now in her camp?
I had heard basically the same thing from a friend whose ad guy was bill's ad guy on the campaign. He said bill was so jovial then hill would walk in the room and the vein in bill's head would start to throb and his mood became dark.

In the article it talks about a friend overhearing Bill rocking Chelsea singing: "I want a diiivvvorce. I want a divvvooorce." Charming.

Great article over at Cato: The Myth of the Rational Voter - explains some of the psychology. If you do nothing else, download it and scroll through to see the fascinating graphs comparing different types of people.

264 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:13:15pm

re: #258 Mardukhai

The CBC called Levant a "right winger" -- he should file a grievance.

Relax, you know someone isn't really mad at you unless they add the word fascist. When someone calls me a right wing fascists, I say "thank you" and go on my merry way.

265 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:14:15pm

re: #257 leap_frog

Also, to me, she looks like she's pretending to write when Mr. Levant is speaking about the Synagogue bombing.

She really exposed her ignorance when she answered his logical question with the lame, 'ah well I have to take it all into consideration...blah blah crap!

AND why does SHE get to do that!?

The rule of law doesn't apply over her 'authority'. Her job grants her rights to ignore any 'other' Canadians rights in any capacity that she chooses, regardless of law?
This is Canada.

This pisses me off so much...

It's rare to see the inner working of this miserable sausage factory. I'm predicting major blowback from this escapade. I say decommission the commission.

266 Jim708  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:14:23pm

Not that it makes a world of difference, but that is the Alberta Human Rights Commission, not the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

You can find the entire printed transcript of his opening buttwhooping at his blog, ezralevant.com

Hope Mark Steyn is taking crib notes on this masterful demonstration.

267 JWM  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:14:54pm

Question:
What legal authority does the CHRC have? Can they imprison, impose fines, shut down a business, or publication?

JWM

268 REDSTATE  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:15:50pm

Wow! Mr. Levant does Canada proud. He mopped the floor with the inquisitor - she was a quivering puddle of goo when he was done with her.

I felt like I was watching an incredibly well-written drama, but to think that this outrage is real is really scary.

What will it take to wake up the Canadian government? And folks, when you find out, would you mind sending some south?

269 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:15:57pm

And what is so arrogant and obnoxious about him! It outrages me that anyone would take such a position on his conduct.

It is the POINT, that petty bureaucratic cancer cells like the CHRC have no moral and legal authority, and they need to be exposed and humiliated for their indiscretions. Playing it nicely and respectfully with them, would be to acknowledging their legitimacy: the legitimacy of "the commission" is precisely what Ezra rightfully wants to blow off the water.

This miserable C&*$ and her bureaucratic cronies insinuate themselves as legislator, judge, and jury... Someone ought to tear their fig leaf. A fat glassy eyed empress without clothes.

Kudos to this amazing man!

270 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:16:03pm

re: #262 lifeofthemind

Nor should you. Nor am I. Boycotts simply do not work in the real world. But, I do have a choice where I can spend my money, and realize the only difference it will make is a difference to me.

271 pat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:16:11pm

re: #235 Sharmuta

re: #198 A.W.

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law."

It sounded from Mr. Levant that some of these people are not judges, or even lawyers on these panels. I find it more offensive that this is even considered legal. The islamists need to realize they have the right to be offended but we have the right to offend. I really agreed with Levant when he asked who do they really harm. They're harming themselves.

This is a man who could use support for his free speech- I highly doubt you'll find this guy calling LGF names.


One of the greatest threats to freedom around the Western World is the adoption of Commissions and Boards. The USA Constitution has no provision for it, BTW. Yet Boards and Commission often take on Judicial rolls. And they frequently draft their own regulations, conduct the investigation, try the case and can defend their own decisions on judicial appeal with public money , if appeal is provided. Some of the worst abuses of individual rights occur because of these bodies. A prime example is the Kelo Decision. But think of the FEC, The FCC and all the Equal Rights Commissions. It is no secret that these bodies are composed of members who absolutely approve of the objectives of them, thus always making them suspect.

272 Nevergiveup  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:16:57pm

re: #265 DistantThunder

Decommission the commission. Yes, but recommission the battleship NEW JERSEY. Better diplomacy thru superior fire power!

273 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:17:00pm

Here is the Canadian Human Rights Commission form to "contact" them.

Link

It might be useful to have millions of Americans protesting this as well, since they plumb can't hurt us dumb ole 'Mericans - legally.

274 sattv4u2  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:17:10pm

re: #264 Nevergiveup

re: #258 Mardukhai


The CBC called Levant a "right winger" -- he should file a grievance.

Relax, you know someone isn't really mad at you unless they add the word fascist. When someone calls me a right wing fascists, I say "thank you" and go on my merry way.

Same here, although as I walk away, i tell them "you forgot NAZI"

275 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:17:16pm

re: #193 newsjunkie_ky

re: #162 eff plus


HRC = human rights commission
HRC = hillary rodham clinton
hhhmmm!

I question the timing.

276 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:17:55pm

Heh. Just got the phone with my big-time sport-fan buddy.

He reminded me of this one.

/Google and Youtube aren't all bad

277 FrogMarch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:18:06pm

re: #258 Mardukhai

The CBC called Levant a "right winger" -- he should file a grievance.

Fuck the left-wing CBC.

He's not a right-winger - Ezra is a normal person-- regular, in the middle- real. human. descent. thinking. He's not a left-wing clone.

The CBC is left-wing censorship-adoring mind-crime loving Stalinist cow shit.

278 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:18:30pm

re: #268 REDSTATE

Wow! Mr. Levant does Canada proud. He mopped the floor with the inquisitor - she was a quivering puddle of goo when he was done with her.

I felt like I was watching an incredibly well-written drama, but to think that this outrage is real is really scary.

What will it take to wake up the Canadian government? And folks, when you find out, would you mind sending some south?

Needs to be a movie: the heroes could be Mr. Levant and the moderate Muslims who believe in Canadian values who support him - there must be a few.

279 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:19:45pm

re: #247 Pro-Bush Canuck

I second that...

LOL

280 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:20:25pm

GB gonna score again

Final Score

Packers 30
Seattle 14

281 ciaospirit  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:20:38pm

Two nice runs by Grant. Too bad he doesn't get his sliding yardage.

282 Shug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:21:22pm

TD cheeseheads

283 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:21:25pm

TD Green Bay

284 Billy Hank  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:21:47pm

#248 - Never Give Up -
"How exactly are you using the word Hilliary. As an adjective to be descriptive or as a verb: as in to do a Hilliary?"

Fortunately, Hillary can be described as a sort of "portmanteau" word in that you can fit in it almost anything you want. In this case, it can be seen as either an adjective or a verb but I was mostly using it as a profanity.

285 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:22:10pm

Seattle 14
Green Bay 14

286 Le_Patriot  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:22:37pm

re: #234 FrogMarch

Moral of the story:
"Give a left-wing an excuse to censor and stomp on free speech -- and they will take it... Just like dangling drugs in front of an adict."
Right on! When they give away our military secrets or dis the troops, it's free speech, but when conservatives speak out against islamofacists, it's a hate crime.

"Leftiwng group-think is simple: do not offend any victim group that they deem a victim group. (and they get to chose what constitutes a victim group) Free speech stops and the door of the left-wing bureaucrat and their chosen victim babies. obey."

Yes.!
When the Patriot Act or border control is invoked, then the Bush administration is called nazi-fascist . . taking away freedoms . . however, when the Libs force govt. healthcare, special lightbulbs, gorebal warming, Kyoto Treaty, gun ownership prohibition, no praying on public property, etc etc, on the public, . . that's not taking away our freedoms . . . it's "for our own good" . . not to worry, the elite demofascist socialist left wing party knows what's best for us all.

*spit*

287 grumpy old codger  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:22:54pm

Having listened/seen the videos, my thought is that the AHRC is using the Lewis Carroll/Alice in Wonderland approach to law:

VERDICT FIRST! TRIAL AFTERWARDS!

288 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:23:16pm

Thanks for the correction - this is not the Canadian Human Rights Commissionm but the Alberta Human Rights & Citizenship Commission.

Here is that contact form

Their main page is a hoot. Who do they think they are?

God obviously.

289 Ayatollah Ghilmeini  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:23:46pm

A fine presentation.

290 nyc redneck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:24:09pm

re: #195 DistantThunder

re: #187 nyc redneck

it's stunning to watch this sour, deranged, grotesque fucking toad sit there in all her presumed power actually looking w/ disdain at this man so obviously her superior. it's bitter horrid losers like this woman who know what's best for all of us. it's animal farm.

now, i'm going to yell and scream real loud.

Makes me hate liberal women even more.

she is a miserable person and dangerous.
levant is a hero.

291 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:24:10pm

re: #262 lifeofthemind

I'm sure they know all about him. You can't read a newspaper in this city without seeing his name come up at least twice a week. The guy is the media's designated go-to muslim on anything. Anything that makes the news that has anything to do with Islam will have Syed Soharwardy in the story also.

292 MuddlinThru  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:24:42pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

I've hit the wrong button! I've done that twice now.

--

293 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:25:21pm
294 DistantThunder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:25:30pm

re: #234 FrogMarch

Moral of the story:
Don't offend the holy prophet big-mo or the left-wing fascists will do what they do best - censor. Give a left-wing an excuse to censor and stomp on free speech -- and they will take it... Just like dangling drugs in front of an adict.

Leftiwng group-think is simple: do not offend any victim group that they deem a victim group. (and they get to chose what constitutes a victim group) Free speech stops and the door of the left-wing bureaucrat and their chosen victim babies. obey.

I want the candidates to compete over the slogan of MORE FREEDOM - and then tell me how they are going to let me have it BACK.

Or as my children say when wrestling with each other and someone is getting crushed: GET OFF OF ME!

295 pat  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:25:44pm

re: #272 Nevergiveup

re: #265 DistantThunder

Decommission the commission. Yes, but recommission the battleship NEW JERSEY. Better diplomacy thru superior fire power!

At one time Bush was presented with a plan to retrofit the New Jersey with modern guns that would have allowed the big barrels to fire a round every 2 seconds. The other guns would be similarly replaced, defensive and Aegis systems added as well as vertical launch platforms, anti-air capability and a helio landing pad. Cost $1B. Objective: Marine support. The fool turned it down. Likely because the Navy does not like to de-mothball and always wants new stuff, even if it means no stuff at all.

296 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:26:09pm

Only 59 penalties.

There's an old-fashioned game for ya :-)

297 rawmuse  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:26:45pm

Ah, another Gov't. agency/program created to smooth out all the rough edges of the Permanent Grievance Class.

298 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:27:24pm

re: #238 lifeofthemind

He said that IBM is employing the idiot who brought this action? Does the employment contract have a clause about acting in a manner that harms the reputation of the employer? IBM needs to look into this. Their reputation is now at risk.

Don't know - but I fired off the link and name to some retired IBMers.

299 Gang of One  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:27:41pm

re: #242 DistantThunder

I want an "I Hunt Idiotarians!" T-shirt and Bumpersticker

I just made that up!

Eggselent!

/Monty Burns

300 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:28:38pm

Fumble Pack recovers.

301 leap_frog  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:29:19pm

re: #266 Jim708

Jim I do realize that, every case has it's own gang er, provincial body, and I gather but not a 100% sure, the CHRC is to facilitate foreign claims against any Canadian worth being sued.

I believe it's a bit of a misstatement by me, guess I'm also including Mark Styne's up coming "thoughts punishment tribunal" in my post.
AND they are all one and the same, just different locations and faces - all else is the same - just like the woman above.

302 Bobblehead  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:30:04pm

re: #238 lifeofthemind

He said that IBM is employing the idiot who brought this action? Does the employment contract have a clause about acting in a manner that harms the reputation of the employer? IBM needs to look into this. Their reputation is now at risk.

Do any of you techies out there work for IBM? Perhaps you might forward these videos to the right person.

303 latitude51  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:30:05pm

re: #298 Bobibutu

If I remember correctly, he is a private consultant and not an employee.

304 themarkside  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:31:27pm

This is why we have a second amendment.

Sic semper tyrannis!

305 lawhawk  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:31:32pm

re: #295 pat

Actually, plans to refit the BB's have been passed around since the 80s. Reagan turned down the idea too. It simply is too expensive to deal with the serious and significant upgrades necessary to all of the New Jersey's systems to warrant the expenditure. Every system on board would need to be upgraded - from electrical and radar suites to the fire control. It wouldn't come cheap, and at a billion per boat, would be a huge drain on the budget when the Navy had other priorities.

306 experiencedtraveller  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:31:44pm

Can we subpoena that interrogator's noted under any freedom of information laws in Canada?

Would love to see what she scribbled...

307 Oh no...Sand People!  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:32:06pm

EZRA LEVANT, U.S. Pres 08!

308 pesca  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:32:40pm

Amazing that the western governments can sink so low. Great video.

It's a bigger problem that we have allowed a whole class of unqualified "regulators" to infect so many parts of our lives. It affects the larger companies who also think that they have to enforce political or social views. Every diversity or anti-harassment "training" I experienced in corporate America was a widely received joke or at least a waste-of-time. But we do it anyway.

It is not the job of the government or your company to train or moderate your religious, political or social views. Your actions may or may not be illegal. But that's between you and official law enforcement, not these unofficial paralegal mind-control agencies.

309 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:33:03pm

TD Green Bay.

310 SmartAss  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:33:29pm

Having examined all presented evidence the commission has established that
(1) publications in Western Standard were prompted by, contained coverage of and expressed opinions on current political events;
(2) cartoons were reproduced clearly as part and in context of the above-mentioned coverage;
(3) publication made deliberate effort to avoid insulting religious beliefs by explicit use of qualifiers such as "militant", "political" and "radical" Islam.

Commission rules to DISMISS the complaint based on subsection 2, section 3 of the HUMAN RIGHTS, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURALISM ACT.

Commission further expresses opinion that complaints were made in bad faith to harass and intimidate political opponents and as such violate the spirit of the HUMAN RIGHTS, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURALISM ACT.

/wake me up

311 gunjam  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:33:30pm

re: #295 pat


At one time Bush was presented with a plan to retrofit the New Jersey with modern guns that would have allowed the big barrels to fire a round every 2 seconds. The other guns would be similarly replaced, defensive and Aegis systems added as well as vertical launch platforms, anti-air capability and a helio landing pad. Cost $1B. Objective: Marine support. The fool turned it down. Likely because the Navy does not like to de-mothball and always wants new stuff, even if it means no stuff at all.

A shame: Bring back Mighty Mo!

312 Bobblehead  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:33:37pm

re: #281 ciaospirit

I read an article in our local rag that your CAIR nemisis is fleeing or has fled our fair city.

313 Oh no...Sand People!  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:33:58pm

That lady is a prototype of the one who will be manning the thermostats in California...

314 sattv4u2  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:34:29pm

I have been watching football for most of my 53 years on this planet, and I can't remember seeing anything like the 1st 17 minutes of this game. I would have bet my house that Green Bay would have needed the entire game IF they were going to recover from that start!

315 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:35:07pm

re: #286 Le_Patriot

If I may go on a tangent, one thing that I've been wondering about this push to ban incandescent light bulbs: Where are the artists on this issue, why are they not speaking out against it?

Incandescent lighting is the closest in quality to natural sunlight of any interior light source. This is especially important regarding color theory and the accurate representation of color.

Artists are supposed to suffer for their art, not have their art suffer for 'feel good' legislation. Why have I not heard a peep from them?

316 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:36:47pm

re: #302 Bobblehead

re: #238 lifeofthemind

He said that IBM is employing the idiot who brought this action? Does the employment contract have a clause about acting in a manner that harms the reputation of the employer? IBM needs to look into this. Their reputation is now at risk.

Do any of you techies out there work for IBM? Perhaps you might forward these videos to the right person.

Working on it.

I will call IBM HQ Monday and complain.

317 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:39:15pm

Wow.

Fallaci 2008 winner, right here in my book. Good show, sir. let this be recorded for all time.


EVERY Lizard should take the time to watch these videos.


Again, bravo.

318 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:39:51pm

Roughing the Kicker on Green Bay.

319 SayeretMatkal  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:39:52pm

re: #306 experiencedtraveller

"The accused seems...logical... no, it can't be. I must be tired."

320 pesca  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:40:02pm

re: #302 Bobblehead

I missed the name cited, but you can search for IBM employee email addresses and phone numbers on their web-site:
[Link: www.ibm.com...]

321 Mambo Bananapatch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:41:51pm

re: #307 Oh no...Sand People!

EZRA LEVANT, U.S. Pres 08!

No way! We need him up here!

:-)

322 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:42:17pm

re: #303 latitude51

re: #298 Bobibutu

If I remember correctly, he is a private consultant and not an employee.

I thot he said "He has a real job downtown at IBM". around 3 mins on tape 3#

If you would point to where he may be a consultant - appreciated.

I am going to call White Plains NY (IBM HQ) Monday and find out who to send the link to.

323 descolada9  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:43:28pm

re: #197 Shug

re: #161 descolada9


I hereby nominate Ezra Levant for the next round of Fallacy awards. .

actually I think the fallacy award should go to the Canadian HRC because their whole existence is a fallacy

Yeah, misspelling on my part. My bad :(

324 lambdaarrow  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:44:24pm

These videos are better than Rocky IV dubbed into German. Wish this Levant guy was running in the primaries. Too bad the chick is.

325 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:45:08pm

FG Seattle!

326 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:45:30pm

re: #315 Slumbering Behemoth

I HATE the new lightbulbs.


So much, that I am stocking up on old ones.

327 experiencedtraveller  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:45:49pm

re: #319 SayeretMatkal

Yeah. I'm thinking smiley faces and a lot of "do you think he likes me?"

328 steve  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:46:43pm

re: #280 Shug

GB gonna score again

Final Score

Packers 30
Seattle 14

Oops, you missed. Do you want to try for 30 to 17?

329 Oh no...Sand People!  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:50:07pm

re: #321 Mambo Bananapatch

re: #307 Oh no...Sand People!

EZRA LEVANT, U.S. Pres 08!

No way! We need him up here!

:-)

Kudos on the hat tip. Hey, you are still up there. You give me hope that when the SHTF that Canada has our backs.

If he was a U.S. citizen and spoke this way during a Presidential debate...he could own .02 cents to his name and he would win the nomination.

Truth speaks.

330 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:50:41pm

This is one of the best LGF posts... ever.

331 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:53:34pm

re: #308 pesca

Amazing that the western governments can sink so low. Great video.

It's a bigger problem that we have allowed a whole class of unqualified "regulators" to infect so many parts of our lives. It affects the larger companies who also think that they have to enforce political or social views. Every diversity or anti-harassment "training" I experienced in corporate America was a widely received joke or at least a waste-of-time. But we do it anyway.

It is not the job of the government or your company to train or moderate your religious, political or social views. Your actions may or may not be illegal. But that's between you and official law enforcement, not these unofficial paralegal mind-control agencies.

A lot of the "training" seminars and such are conducted by large businesses in part to spare them in insurance costs. It costs a lot of money to employ people- the larger the company, the deeper the pockets. Large corporations tend to have zero tolerance for anything another employee could sue them for allowing in the workplace. The best advice I could give anyone on such a work environment is, "keep your mouth shut".

But this is the case of a publisher asserting his right to freedom of the press. There's also a big difference between a private corporation's workplace policy and the government infringing on guaranteed rights. Clearly- with freedom of the press, this hearing should not even be occurring. It's outrageous.

332 zygazint  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:54:02pm

Most excellent. Two HUGE thumbs up. Where can I send this guy some money.

333 Jim708  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:54:07pm

re: #301 leap_frog


Leap_frog, the CHRC handles cases that would have national implications. For instance, if Walmart decided they were only going to hire purple polka dotted uniks, which would be unfair to the blue and white striped uniks.

The provincial HRCs, and yes, every province has one, deal with more localized complaints, like the hair dressing salon he mentions... (really need emoticons for that. It truly deserves rolling eyes)

None of them have any mandate to deal with complaints from outside the country.

As I said though, I hope Mark Steyn is taking notes, because that was masterful by Ezra. I can only imagine what someone like Steyn is capable of coming up with.

334 Jim708  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:55:42pm

And that is too wierd... my last post number is the same as the hull number of the last ship I sailed on... ;)

335 zygazint  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:55:43pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

He knows he's setting a precedent and your comment is not becoming of you, WoG.

336 steve  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:56:43pm

I love Ezra's first response to the hags question.

Why is that a relevant question?

337 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:56:58pm

Seahawks 1st and 10 at the 16.

Still want to see GB pull through here :-)

338 McNug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:58:34pm

Dude is like a real-life Hank Rearden. I love this guy.

339 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:59:01pm

re: #326 astronmr20

They're great for saving money on the electricity bill, but are for shit if you want to put brush to canvas. There's that mercury thing as well.

340 Meryl Yourish  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 2:59:27pm

Is this guy married? 'Cause if he isn't, I want to marry him. ;-)

Wow. Go, Ezra!

341 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:00:08pm

Lateral - incredible!

342 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:00:20pm

TD Green Bay!

343 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:01:26pm

Seattle 17
Green Bay 28

It's not even half time.

344 pontificatingweasel  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:01:33pm

I am hearing impaired and can't hear the audio. A transcript of the opening statement is here:

[Link: ezralevant.com...]

I apologize if this has already been posted. I didn't have time to read all the posts in this thread.

If anyone finds a transcript of the remainder of the, um, hearing. Please link to it. Thanks.

345 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:01:50pm

28-17 - she's not over yet though folks.

346 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:02:42pm

Ezra Levant is great...He deserves to be remembered when the Fiskie nominations come up again eleven months from now.

347 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:03:13pm

re: #343 jcm

Seattle 17
Green Bay 28

It's not even half time.

Incredible game.

That's why they call it the "ballet for guys" :-)

348 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:05:18pm

re: #340 Meryl Yourish

Is this guy married? 'Cause if he isn't, I want to marry him. ;-)

Wow. Go, Ezra!

Some press coverage
By Ezra Levant on January 11, 2008 6:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (13) | Trackbacks (2)
At today's "human rights" interrogation, I was not permitted to bring anyone other than my lawyer and my wife along -- the "human rights officer" barred others from attending as observers, even other officers of the magazine (such as our former editor). The news media who showed up congregated in the lobby of the law firm and waited until we were done.

349 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:07:12pm

re: #335 zygazint

Exactly. He's not talking to a judge. And he did not cross the line of personal rudeness, either.

350 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:07:14pm

re: #347 Pro-Bush Canuck

That was a great play by Favre.

Seattle's defense better step up in the 2nd half.

351 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:07:15pm

BTW, Lizards, there was a big tribute concert in Toronto for Oscar Peterson.

Wish I could have been there.

352 McNug  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:07:53pm

re: #20 newsjunkie_ky

Body language, she has crossed her arms and sat back. Nothing he says is what she wants to hear. B**ch.

It's even worse than that. She is perfectly ignorant - she has never heard of Kafka, has never heard of Stalin, has never met a Muslim before, and is unable to grasp any of the implications of "free speech". She is just a soulless drone in the machine, going with the flow.

353 mph  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:08:25pm

That was awesome...

How about some posters for right-minded Canadians to spread awareness? I can't imagine even 10% of Canadians being in favor of this mind-crime bureaucracy. Perhaps this can be turned around on its head into a positive.

354 Pro-Bush Canuck  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:10:33pm

This kind of play - on a snow/ice covered field -- is what we're used to here in Canada.

Our playoff is called the Grey Cup.

355 clarence  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:12:38pm

This interview makes me both a proud and embarrased Canadian at the same time. I hope Mark Steyn videotapes his interrogation as well.

/popcorn

356 lambdaarrow  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:13:50pm

re: #338 McNug

Exactly. I had the feeling I was watching something Rand had written.

357 kevinmumaw  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:14:50pm
Ottawa Human Rights Commission = Judge Judy.


HA!

358 beavereater  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:17:42pm

Ezra was so on the mark that from now on all Beaver's have the right to chew the ass out of any liberal, at any time, and not be frowned upon by The Society of Beavers at the next workshop on soiling ones self!

359 kevinmumaw  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:22:24pm

Alberta, not Ottawa

360 june_july  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:26:28pm

I predict that after this, the HRC people will not let anyone tape any of these hearings again.

Incredible video. Banality of evil indeed.

361 jcm  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:28:08pm

TD Green Bay.

Running all over Seattle.

ARRGH!

362 zygazint  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:28:38pm

re: #349 astronmr20

re: #335 zygazint

Exactly. He's not talking to a judge. And he did not cross the line of personal rudeness, either.

I figure Ezra has the right to be a tad animated after all the years Jews have had to suffer the indignity of arab 'cartoons' against Israel and Zionists- farmers, that is. Isn't that what Zionists are? Kibbutzim doing collective work on their sovereign country land to better the environment for arab and Jews alike. Give them a state, screw the arabs.

363 lostlakehiker  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:36:04pm

The body language of the prosecutor was interesting. Sort of "I have you where I want you now. You have dared to disrespect me. Now, behold the true power of the dark side."

364 friarstale  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:37:49pm

I feel even better now knowing the Canadian Human Rights Commission got my vote for Dhimmi of the Year Award

I love when he says, roughly paraphrased, that he published it for every single reason listed in the complaint, and so what if he did?

365 friarstale  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:40:10pm

re: #360 june_july

I predict that after this, the HRC people will not let anyone tape any of these hearings again.

Incredible video. Banality of evil indeed.

I also found myself wondering why they let this be taped. Ezra was brilliant, and this tape may be very inspiring to non-muslim freedom fighters everywhere.

366 thefish  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:40:11pm

That guy was absolutely magnificent.

How can that woman go to work every day and do what she does?

It is so great to see someone stand up to this multi-cultural drivel.

He's the new, greatest anti-idiotarian.

367 USBeast  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:44:04pm

I'm sort of surprised Levant even showed up for the hearing. I'd have shredded the summons and sent it back to them with a rude suggestion of what they could do with it. Then, if they got shirty about it I'd turn it into a media circus.

"All those who doeth evil hateth the Light." John:...something or other.

368 MagnaniomousCoward  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:44:19pm

re: #357 kevinmumaw

No, worse than Judge Judy for many reasons.

369 USBeast  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:47:50pm

re: #361 jcm

You don't know what real pain is. I'm a Bears and Cubs fan.

370 AtadOFF  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:48:12pm

Really starting to like this guy!

371 Promethea  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:48:25pm

re: #39 Sharmuta

All three videos were brilliant. I loved his answer to the question of his intent- because he had the right to do so. And his question in the final video was also spot on- do these grievance theater productions cause more or less harm to the ummah?

Great videos- thanks for sharing them, Charles.

Here is a real case of exposing the cockroaches to the light of day. Thank you, Charles, for posting this. We all need to be vigilant against these slow erosions of our freedom of speech and thought. In my view, the whole concept of "hate crime" is flawed and should be put to rest. Either someone commits an actual crime or they don't. There is no special spot for "hate," maybe I hate spinach. Should the spinach growers sue me?

372 Sounder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:49:20pm

Those who believe in free speech instead of the kangaroo court Human Rights (thought) Commissions, sign this petition please!

373 brent  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:51:58pm
I will not minimize my reasons so that they are palateable

If I would have been a spectator at that inquisition, Iwould have stood and cheered at that line.

You go, sir!

374 segesta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:53:25pm

I'm not sure what is a greater waste of Canadian taxpayer money: that woman's salary, or that artwork on the wall. A nice peaceful Canadian scene, but with a subtly distorted perspective.

Wait, perhaps that painting is the perfect metaphor.

375 bsm engineer  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:53:25pm

There is an old cowboy saying:

"Do not be angry at those who are smarter than you, it is not their fault"

She should take note...

376 Whiterasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:53:26pm

re: #367 USBeast

I'd have had them drag me there in chains. I refuse to bow down before them.

Parasites!

377 Whiterasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:55:33pm

re: #373 brent

They won't be letting any more video cameras in the Kangaroo courtroom, you can be sure of that after today.

The parasites like to do their dirty work in secret.

378 Promethea  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:58:22pm

re: #81 Gang of One

re: #69 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Talk about Great Galloping Gramscian Whores of the Caliphate™. The lefty is one of their foot soldiers, if not one of the whores.

I'm trying to think of a dramatic way to spread this phrase. A rotating title would be one first step. Maybe there could be a little symbol that pops up when someone like this Human Wrongs commissioner is labeled a Gramscian Whore of the Caliphate.

Ridicule is the first defense against Islam. It's actually the one I'm counting most on. (Seriously.)

379 brent  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:58:57pm

In that last video, the council for the state was not writing any of the good stuff down... I wonder if she's thinking, boy this video is going to make me look stupid forever - like lesson to your children, stupid?

WHat did he say? The leader of the supreme council of Islam, a part time job? He works down at IBM...

Hey, IBM, you better keep an eye on your folk a bit closer - you may want your HR folks asking, just randomly let's say, "who where want's to kill all the infiidels" once in a while. I bet you get a few "Yeah, can I?"s out of your guys. Just sayiin'

380 Ferdy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:59:02pm

I realize I am late to the party but I have to address a comment made a while back (#156?). It is a set up.

It is all too common that an 'activist' provokes a conflict with a private institution in order to bring a complaint to one of our thought crime tribunals. They advance their agenda with the eager and willing collusion of the like minded fascists that populate these quasi-legal commissions.

The worst is that my tax dollars are funding this affront.

381 USBeast  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:59:51pm

re: #376 Whiterasta

With you on that, but make sure there are lots of cameras.

382 Arbalest  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 3:59:53pm

I watched all three of the videos and read the text of Ezra Levant's opening remarks at his blog (link courtesy Hot Air).

It looks like Mr. Levant took a whip to the CHRC. I particularly like Mr. Levant's denial of their authority. The aparatchik certainly looks unhappy.

It seems that the best way to handle these bureaucrats is to videotape them (whether they like it, permit it, or not).

My guess is that she and her boss will be even less happy when they are served papers and have to explain their actions publicly in a Canadian court. I wonder if there will be denunciaions from within the CHRC soon. I suspect there will be firings.

I’m not Canadian, but it strikes me that this set of actions by the CHRC is illegal under Canadian law.

Can Mr. Levant have the CHRC abolished, and its officers, apparatchiks and the plaintiffs tried for subversion and conspiracy to violate his rights?

383 Thanos  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:00:43pm

I love this guy, he's my new hero. Too late for the Fallaci alas.

384 docweasel  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:01:19pm

WrathofG-d 1/12/08 12:46:35 pm reply quote report -18
Ok, this guy is a bit rude.
I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

I disagree. They dragged his ass down there, under threat of legal jeopardy and punishment, over the fact that he may have "insulted Islam". I hope he has legal recourse to sue them and even prosecute them for misconduct.

I love this story because it right up in the face of all the smug, self-righteous Canadians who look down their nose at the US. For all the supposed "fear" promulgated by the Bush Admin, there sure is a lot of protesting and criticism of the president, and I don't recall hearing about anyone (other than those who directly threaten violence) being called before any commissions, being jailed, being silenced or even being harassed or intimidated.

This is the most publically criticized presidency in my lifetime, and its during a time of war to boot.

He should be as rude to them as they are to him, wasting his time, taxpayer monies and government office space and man-hours in persecuting the free press of Canada. All Canadians should be ashamed of what is being done in their name, with their money.

Me, I'm proud millions of Iraqis are now free to vote and live under a democracy with my tax money, led by a president I respect doing the best job possible with a difficult task.

This is why Canada is usually just a punchline to Americans.

385 Sounder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:02:59pm

re: #382 Arbalest

There is an effort underway to end these one sided HRCs. The Petition is here.

386 Promethea  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:08:43pm

re: #142 Stringart

re: #111 Nevergiveup

I have a friend who was found guilty by the NYC Human Rights Thing. That of course was predetermined, However, he fought it and the decision was OVERTURNED by the NY SUPREME COURT. It was costly to him in both emotional strain and money. For my Canuck friends: Can this farce of a panel be appealed to a real court up there?
Yes. I'm a little hazy on the specifics but a man in Saskatchewan was found guilty (shocka) by the HRC for placing an ad in a newspaper listing, not the complete text, but just the chapter and verse numbers of Bible passages condemning homosexuality. About 6 years later, his "conviction" was overturned in appellate court. Of course, by then the damage was done. Like your friend, he paid a huge cost emotionally and financially.

I believe there is something in California called a SLAPP suit that helps prevent nuisance suits like the one you're describing. I'm lots of LGF lawyers and others can fill me in on the details.

387 Whiterasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:10:10pm

I wonder if the Gramscian Whore has any idea of what her human rights will be under islamic rule?

For showing her hair in public, she'd be whipped and then stoned to death.

388 WriterMom  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:13:41pm
389 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:14:13pm

re: #371 Promethea

If this were happening in America, I would tell him to counter-sue. Since this is Canada, I'm not sure what recourse he has available to him, but this video tape has worked wonders so far.

As far as hate crimes are concerned, I'd find it amusing in a hypocritical sense. The same people who tell us it's not our place to judge another society or lifestyle are now the same people telling us what thoughts constitute hate when involved in a crime. Doesn't that involve judging something to be "hateful"? The leftists are very selective hypocrites- they're the ones who know how to use our own system against us- even better than the islamists.

390 beavereater  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:15:15pm

#384 dickweasel

This is why Canada is usually just a punchline to Americans.

Your diapers need changing fluffy!

391 Egfrow  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:16:44pm

If what I've seen in this video represents the state of Justice in Canada then I believe I have just witnessed the destruction of Canada's as we know it. We know have the People's Republic of Canadistan.

392 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:17:58pm

re: #10 Nevergiveup

I don't know that woman and I never met that woman, But I know her type. I bet she knows what's best for me. I bet she would be proud to call herself a progressive. I bet she would think I am a Neanderthal narrow minded neocon bigot. And boy is she lucky I can't put my hands thru this computer screen and grab hold of her arrogant neck. But that's just me!

I used to work with a lot of people like her at the board of education. As far as her type is concerned, they are normal and the rest of us are crazy and dangerous.

I learned some hard lessons while working there.

If you're going to buck the system, you'd better know your rights and be prepared for the consequences. (Ezra Levant knows what he's doing.)

393 Sounder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:20:06pm

And now the Imam who filed the complaint with the AHRC wants to sue Levant after viewing the videos posted here and elsewhere.

394 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:24:00pm

re: #42 Orde

I'm watching video 2, and Levant is informed on the law while the inquisitor is either grossly disingenuous in asking about Levant's intent or either she's shamefully ignorant about the fundamentals of the law. I don't blame him for his outrage at all.

Intent is an important aspect of a hate crime.

395 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:25:07pm

re: #79 ciaospirit

How dare she invoke 9/11.

Her reference to 9/11 was only about the imagined attacks it brought about towards muslims. He wasn't buying her stupidity.

396 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:25:23pm

re: #393 Sounder

And now the Imam who filed the complaint with the AHRC wants to sue Levant after viewing the videos posted here and elsewhere.

Of course he wants to sue- it's the Western equivalent of a fatwa.

397 Gozer the Carpathian  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:29:44pm

Complete and utter BS this whole ordeal. Though it's great to see him not sitting still for it and taking it on the chin. He's fighting back and I look forward to hearing about how much arse he's kicked when this is all done. :)

With folks like this around there's still hope for our Canadian friends!

398 Sounder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:30:22pm

re: #396 Sharmuta

re: #393 Sounder

And now the Imam who filed the complaint with the AHRC wants to sue Levant after viewing the videos posted here and elsewhere.

Of course he wants to sue- it's the Western equivalent of a fatwa.

I was a bit wrong. The Iman wants to sue because of comments on Ezra's website where he referred to him as a "tin-pot fascist", for one and a "radical, Saudi-trained imam". God knows what he'll do when he watches the videos.

399 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:31:43pm

re: #77 WhiteRasta

re: #58 gunjam

We have a minority conservative government in power right now, but we Canucks will soon return to our senses and vote in the |Liberals next election.

Alberta is the last bastion of conservatism in this country.

Even liberals have to have a job, the only thing they can do is be a human rights inquisitor. It's not like it's a real job like being a doctor or teacher.

These commissions were established under a Liberal government, so I don't understand why you're bringing the Conservatives into this as if they were to blame.

400 Pacificlady  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:32:20pm

Orwell was a genius. HRC = thought police

401 Fionn MacCumhaill  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:32:39pm

Re: #315

This is far offtopic for this thoughtcrime thread,

(but maybe not - there might be Lightbulb Commissions someday which interrogate people about their opinions as to how things should be lighted.)

but an incandescent light is not anywhere near hot enough to give a good simulation of sunlight. Incandescent-bulb light has lots of red and is very deficient in blue and purple light.

Fluorescent bulbs that are good artist's lights do exist, but they are more expensive than ordinary fluorescent lights.

402 mghirsch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:36:54pm

To paraphrase Mallard Fillmore:

A liberal is one who thinks everyone is entitled to their own opinion and is surprised when someone actually has one.

403 Whiterasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:37:11pm

re: #399 Josephine

You misunderstood my sarcasm.

404 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:38:37pm

HOLY SHIT!

I just found out the radical who sued Ezra is a prof at my university! I am in the same campus as this scumbag 5 days a week!

[Link: www.ece.uwaterloo.ca...]

hyperventilating with anger

405 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:39:46pm

[Link: www.ece.uwaterloo.ca...]

I feel like going to his office and spitting on his face on Monday!

406 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:42:13pm

"He maligned a burn victim, calling him a fool. Twice. He referred to one of the complainants as a clown, using that term in a deliberately offensive, derrogatory, disrespectful and disparaging way. N-o-w I've got his ass..."

/Notes by HRC bureaucrat, vigilant upholder of respect for clowns

/Rejected script for Twilight Zone --way too wierd

/His finger-waving makes me feeel unsafe, so I need more hazardous-duty pay. Where's that form?

/If I come down hard on this guy, surely my new islamic overlords will be pleased

/May the monster eat me last

407 Whiterasta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:42:32pm

re: #405 medaura18586

Don't spit on him. It will dirty your spit.

408 Sounder  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:43:45pm

re: #404 medaura18586

It was Syed Soharwardy, a Calgary Imam, who filed the complaint against Ezra.

409 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:45:28pm

re: #406 abolitionist

LOL

410 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:46:33pm

re: #408 Sounder

There were two people who sued him. I'm pretty sure he is one of them...

At least Blanchfield didn't repeat the CIC's slogan that it's the largest Muslim group in the country. Other than a handful of media spokesmen, it's an empty shell -- and Elmasry himself only works as its president-for-life on a part-time basis.--Ezra's website

Isn't he the one he is talking about, working at IBM? It would make sense, an electrical engineer consulting for IBM.

411 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:50:30pm

WE NEED TO SUPPORT THIS MAN- Financially. His situation represents all that needs to be nipped in the bud and strangled in it's crib.

Canadians- open your wallets. The enemy of freedom is upon you. Americans open your wallets, for you are certainly next.

412 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:54:39pm

re: #178 AuldTrafford

re: #172 themaninthestripedsuit


The Straight Dope on "Bloody" as profanity

"In foul language, a vague epithet expressing anger, resentment, but often a mere intensive, especially with a negative -- as, not a bloody one." They cite an 1840s usage.


I think this depends upon the society. In England, I believe it is (or was) a pretty strong profanity. In this country, your definition is quite correct.

One of my favorite quotes: "I'm Winston 'Bloody' Churchill !"

413 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:57:11pm

re: #269 medaura18586

And what is so arrogant and obnoxious about him! It outrages me that anyone would take such a position on his conduct.

It is the POINT, that petty bureaucratic cancer cells like the CHRC have no moral and legal authority

Alas but they do indeed have legal authority. They cannot imprison anyone, but they can impose financial restitution (equivalent of a fine) and ther such penalties.

Among the many disturbing things about all this is that, if as Mark Steyn has said is true, complaints are NEVER dismissed, these commissions appear to work on the principle that if anyone is sufficiently aggrieved to file a complaint, that alone is evidence that the complainants rights have been violated.

This has really got to stop. Unfortunately Ezra Levant and the Western STandard as small potatoes so I doubt that this case will result in any change, but hauling Macleans - Canada's equivalent to Newsweek or Time - before them will surely cause more than just murmurings among a concerned minority.

I hope.

414 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:58:15pm

As much as the commission got Pwn3d by Ezra in these videos- and as much as this may become an issue that wakes people up and makes them challenge the Commission's authority-

These are not the sort of people to go down easily, either, for the simple reason of EGO. Going further, the way their minds work- they STILL "know what's better for you-" regardless.

Ezra clearly spelled out every reason- by Canadian law and statues set over 800 years of common law- that they have no legal authority over him. Regardless, these "powers" created out of thin air still exist for the Commission, and they won't be letting go easily.

415 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 4:59:58pm

re: #414 astronmr20

I should have said- *should* have no legal authority over him.

416 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:02:10pm

re: #332 zygazint

Most excellent. Two HUGE thumbs up. Where can I send this guy some money.

Go to his website ezralevant.com, and you can make a donation there. I'm going to as soon as I start a new visa billing cycle!

417 debutaunt  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:02:12pm

re: #198 A.W.

The most offensive element here is there is no motion to dismiss. They have to take every single complaint seriously. there is no ability to say, "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." In american courts, and probably in normal canadian courts, you can file a motion to dismiss or demurrer, that literally says "even if you are right on the facts, you are wrong on the law." Further, we require you to produce at least a little evidence to support all the elements of the crime or cause of action, or else face a motion for summary judgment,

If i was him, i would refuse to show up. "you have no authority over me and therefore your summons is unlawful." i would go to prison for my freedom of speech.

A nation of hurt feelings, by hurt feelings and...

418 Joseph  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:03:19pm
WrathofG-d 1/12/08 12:46:35 pm

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

WoG is a damned fool!

419 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:04:19pm

re: #418 Joseph

Easy, broseph.

He's already taken enough for his comment. (;

420 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:06:06pm

re: #355 clarence

This interview makes me both a proud and embarrased Canadian at the same time. I hope Mark Steyn videotapes his interrogation as well.

/popcorn

Mark Steyn is really "lucky" - he gets to appear before the Canadian, Ontario and British Columbia Human Rights Commissions. The same complaint was filed with all three bodies, and apparently there is no way to get two of them thrown out.

Another reason why this entire process is ridiculous and anti-legal at base.

421 nutofthenorth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:08:15pm

This rocks! Well done buddy. More of us need to stand up like this!

422 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:08:37pm

re: #367 USBeast

I'm sort of surprised Levant even showed up for the hearing. I'd have shredded the summons and sent it back to them with a rude suggestion of what they could do with it. Then, if they got shirty about it I'd turn it into a media circus.

"All those who doeth evil hateth the Light." John:...something or other.

Yeah, well that would be like not bothering to show up if someone sued you. It doesn't mean the proceeding would stop.

423 Sharmuta  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:08:38pm

re: #398 Sounder

I don't think it matters what comments are made where- the imams want to sue- they see it as a legal way to bully and threaten Westerners into silently accepting shari'a.

424 Wendya  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:10:43pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

Can you imagine Hamilton or Jefferson toadying to a "Human Rights Commission" that questioned their published words?

Sometimes, it's not only best but necessary to treat people like that HRC representative with the contempt they've earned and fully deserve. She should have been ashamed to sit behind that table and if she wasn't she needs to be treated with the utmost contempt.

425 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:12:19pm

re: #403 Whiterasta

Please accept my apology; I did mistake your sarcasm for sincerity.

426 jooly  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:12:38pm

Why does Steyn have to appear anywhere? He lives here in the US. What are they going to do? Try to extradite him?

427 Orde  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:12:44pm

re: #116 markie

Nobody expected a kind of Spanish Inquisition...


On his blog, Levant tells us what he half-expected, and check out his description of what he got instead:

" If you don't pay attention, you might not even realize that freedoms are being eroded. I had half-expected a combative, missionary-style interrogator. I found, instead, a limp clerk who was just punching the clock. She had done it dozens of times before, and will do it dozens of times again. In a way, that's more terrifying." [Link: ezralevant.com...]
428 Joseph  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:14:13pm

btw, this isn't the first time I've seen WoG say something defeatist and moronoic like that. I'm afraid that with such folks on our side, we will never win the battle that looms.

429 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:14:15pm

re: #413 Lauraf

re: #269 medaura18586

And what is so arrogant and obnoxious about him! It outrages me that anyone would take such a position on his conduct.

It is the POINT, that petty bureaucratic cancer cells like the CHRC have no moral and legal authority

Alas but they do indeed have legal authority. They cannot imprison anyone, but they can impose financial restitution (equivalent of a fine) and ther such penalties.

Among the many disturbing things about all this is that, if as Mark Steyn has said is true, complaints are NEVER dismissed, these commissions appear to work on the principle that if anyone is sufficiently aggrieved to file a complaint, that alone is evidence that the complainants rights have been violated.

This has really got to stop. Unfortunately Ezra Levant and the Western STandard as small potatoes so I doubt that this case will result in any change, but hauling Macleans - Canada's equivalent to Newsweek or Time - before them will surely cause more than just murmurings among a concerned minority.

I hope.

Agreed.

Ezra is small potatoes as a target, but by publicly addressing the CHRC in such an articulate and poignant manner, he can bring a lot of attention to his cause.

My point in the excerpt you quoted above, is that this "commission" has no properly derived legal authority. They get away with harassing private citizens by default, because almost none of their accussees ever challenge their legal authority in the whole process. To treat this "commission" respectfully, as if it were a real court, is to grant it legitimacy. These bastards win by default!

In this case, by holding them in contempt, by being "rude and obnoxious", by not "minimizing his intentions to fit what his prosecutor might consider palatable", he is acting in defiance. There is no way they can justify their authority, and by questioning it from the start, he paves the way for taking this up to the next level, at the Supreme Count, as completely anti-constitutional.

430 OliveMe  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:15:34pm

Levant is so articulate. His passion is breathtaking... and thank God for people like that who will stand up to the new Thought Police.

431 Dearborn Shariaphobe  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:17:26pm

Has she no shame?!

432 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:17:32pm

re: #404 medaura18586

HOLY SHIT!

I just found out the radical who sued Ezra is a prof at my university! I am in the same campus as this scumbag 5 days a week!

[Link: www.ece.uwaterloo.ca...]

hyperventilating with anger

Did Elmasry's Canadian Islamic Congress lodge the complaint against the Western Standard or Mark Steyn and Maclean's?

Did you read Michael Coren's recent column about Elmasry:
[Link: www.torontosun.com...]

433 bkgodfrey  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:18:01pm

Brilliant.

434 Orde  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:19:52pm

re: #262 lifeofthemind

re: #245 Slumbering Behemoth
re: #238 lifeofthemind
I nearly forgot that part. I won't be buying any IBM products until they clean house. Get to it, IBM!

Not calling for any secondary boycotts, they don't do any good anyway. It is reputation and publicity that matters. I'm confident that 95% of IBM management know nothing of this. If any lizards can get the word to them they may act.


Man, just when I was starting to forget about IBM's role in aiding the Holocaust another ugly IBM hate connection comes along.

435 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:20:40pm

Thank you, Charles Johnson, for posting this. You can bet your bottom dollar it won't be carried on the TV news here in Toronto.

436 Jimmah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:21:23pm

I know it's been said before here already, but the only thing I have to say right now, having just watched these three videos, is "Fallaci material!"

437 todler  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:21:24pm

Wewll, he didn't win many friends on the hrc with that one.

But man alive, that was outstanding. Thank god there are people willing to face an imposing situation and do what is necessary to remind the rest of us, and the government, of our rights and responsabilities.

438 infidelia  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:25:12pm

See, this is why I voted the Commish for the Fiskie. As malevolent and fascistic as the Leftard commentators and Islamist camp followers may be, the smug, arrogant bureauwhore conducting this interrogation is in a position of control over Ezra's freedom and the quality of his life. There is no issue of his being rude or "obnoxious". This was not some dinner party conversation. This overnment flunkie was interrogating him unlawfully, as he notes in his opening statement. He would be perfectly with his rights if he reached over and b***h-slapped her into unconsciousness. Same as if she aimed a gun at him and demanded his money, except that she wants his money and his silent obedience. At this stage we err greatly if we treat these little fascist functionaries with anything but the contempt they deserve because it adds to their delusion that they have the right to treat us as criminals. Does anyone watching her doubt that she believes nobody has the right to ever offend her?

To #42 newsjunkie_ky

Shrink a "Mo da Bomb" T-shirt and put it on the Ozzie bobblehead. Voila!

439 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:25:52pm

re: #432 Josephine

re: #404 medaura18586

HOLY SHIT!

I just found out the radical who sued Ezra is a prof at my university! I am in the same campus as this scumbag 5 days a week!

[Link: www.ece.uwaterloo.ca...]

hyperventilating with anger

Did Elmasry's Canadian Islamic Congress lodge the complaint against the Western Standard or Mark Steyn and Maclean's?

Did you read Michael Coren's recent column about Elmasry:
[Link: www.torontosun.com...]

I read that. I knew we had a nut on campus who was a prof, a self-anointed "prophet"/leader of some Muslim organization, who is sympathetic toward suicide-bombing Israel. But there are too many pseudo-intellectual pieces of crap around campus for me to fit into my radar screen at all times. Evil can be so banal indeed you sometimes get too bored/disgusted with it to keep an eye on it.

I am not sure anymore now, if he directly filed the complaint about Ezra as well, but he definitely was the one harassing Steyn. I will put up posters on campus to denounce this scumbag!

440 JohnAdams  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:27:00pm

Just watched the video. Oh, that was sweet!
How many of us would have liked to have that forum? And yet, I KNOW I could not have handled it any better than Levant. Bravo!
Sometimes I worry that Canada may be going the way of the Eurodhimmi, but then I know from many Canadian posters here on LGF, and from folks like Levant, that there is a strong libertarian and patriotic pulse in Canada.
Now, back to the Red Wings against the Senators on Hockey Night in Canada.

441 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:27:04pm

re: #438 infidelia

See, this is why I voted the Commish for the Fiskie. As malevolent and fascistic as the Leftard commentators and Islamist camp followers may be, the smug, arrogant bureauwhore conducting this interrogation is in a position of control over Ezra's freedom and the quality of his life. There is no issue of his being rude or "obnoxious". This was not some dinner party conversation. This overnment flunkie was interrogating him unlawfully, as he notes in his opening statement. He would be perfectly with his rights if he reached over and b***h-slapped her into unconsciousness. Same as if she aimed a gun at him and demanded his money, except that she wants his money and his silent obedience. At this stage we err greatly if we treat these little fascist functionaries with anything but the contempt they deserve because it adds to their delusion that they have the right to treat us as criminals. Does anyone watching her doubt that she believes nobody has the right to ever offend her?

DITTO!

442 Stringart  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:30:26pm

#399 Josephine

These commissions were established under a Liberal government, so I don't understand why you're bringing the Conservatives into this as if they were to blame.

Alberta hasn't had a Liberal government since the 1920s. The PCs most certainly are to blame for the AHRC.

443 JohnAdams  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:32:09pm

re: #438 infidelia

See, this is why I voted the Commish for the Fiskie. As malevolent and fascistic as the Leftard commentators and Islamist camp followers may be, the smug, arrogant bureauwhore conducting this interrogation is in a position of control over Ezra's freedom and the quality of his life. There is no issue of his being rude or "obnoxious". This was not some dinner party conversation. This overnment flunkie was interrogating him unlawfully, as he notes in his opening statement. He would be perfectly with his rights if he reached over and b***h-slapped her into unconsciousness. Same as if she aimed a gun at him and demanded his money, except that she wants his money and his silent obedience. At this stage we err greatly if we treat these little fascist functionaries with anything but the contempt they deserve because it adds to their delusion that they have the right to treat us as criminals. Does anyone watching her doubt that she believes nobody has the right to ever offend her?

It's funny. This exchange really illuminated something for me re: the leftard govt functionary against a true free citizen. It is as though a sheep were taking on a wolf. Metaphorically it really stands up.

444 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:32:21pm

re: #404 medaura18586

HOLY SHIT!

I just found out the radical who sued Ezra is a prof at my university! I am in the same campus as this scumbag 5 days a week!

[Link: www.ece.uwaterloo.ca...]

hyperventilating with anger

Is this the guy who stated in a televised interview that all Israelis over the age of 18 are legitimate targets?

445 Jimmah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:33:06pm

re: #438 infidelia

Exactly. He treated this set up as the outrage that it is. His response and his attitude were perfect.

446 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:33:08pm

re: #444 Lauraf

Yes, he is the one!

447 Alberta Oil Peon  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:33:37pm

Thank you, Charles, for posting this. It is very important, because, left unchallenged, kangaroo courts such as these could shut down all dissent against the "politically correct" party line.

To those who suggest that Ezra should have simply ignored the summons, I say, "you don't get it." Ezra is treating this as an opportunity to attack the very notion that such anti-democratic bodies can even exist.

You go, Ezra!

448 JohnAdams  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:35:25pm

re: #447 Alberta Oil Peon

That's right. Fuck the HRC and its ilk. I would gladly go to jail to deliver a beatdown like Ezra did.

449 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:37:31pm

re: #429 medaura18586

re: #413 Lauraf


re: #269 medaura18586

And what is so arrogant and obnoxious about him! It outrages me that anyone would take such a position on his conduct.

It is the POINT, that petty bureaucratic cancer cells like the CHRC have no moral and legal authority


Alas but they do indeed have legal authority. They cannot imprison anyone, but they can impose financial restitution (equivalent of a fine) and ther such penalties.

Among the many disturbing things about all this is that, if as Mark Steyn has said is true, complaints are NEVER dismissed, these commissions appear to work on the principle that if anyone is sufficiently aggrieved to file a complaint, that alone is evidence that the complainants rights have been violated.

This has really got to stop. Unfortunately Ezra Levant and the Western STandard as small potatoes so I doubt that this case will result in any change, but hauling Macleans - Canada's equivalent to Newsweek or Time - before them will surely cause more than just murmurings among a concerned minority.

I hope.


Agreed.

Ezra is small potatoes as a target, but by publicly addressing the CHRC in such an articulate and poignant manner, he can bring a lot of attention to his cause.

My point in the excerpt you quoted above, is that this "commission" has no properly derived legal authority. They get away with harassing private citizens by default, because almost none of their accussees ever challenge their legal authority in the whole process. To treat this "commission" respectfully, as if it were a real court, is to grant it legitimacy. These bastards win by default!

In this case, by holding them in contempt, by being "rude and obnoxious", by not "minimizing his intentions to fit what his prosecutor might consider palatable", he is acting in defiance. There is no way they can justify their authority, and by questioning it from the start, he paves the way for taking this up to the next level, at the Supreme Count, as completely anti-constitutional.

Yup, and he's gonna need a lot of financial help to do that.

450 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:40:59pm

re: #446 medaura18586

re: #444 Lauraf

Yes, he is the one!

That would include my 86 year old eema... Sad that the evil of such a comment got so little attention.

451 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:43:58pm

re: #450 Lauraf

re: #446 medaura18586

re: #444 Lauraf

Yes, he is the one!

That would include my 86 year old eema... Sad that the evil of such a comment got so little attention.

You tell me... I am myself a Jew. What's saddest is that this evil maniac is still allowed to teach at one of Canada's best universities. The university acted all embarrassed about his comment,... embarrassed supposedly, but certainly not indignant enough to fire his terrorist-sympathizing ass!

452 Joseph  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:44:16pm

Every great war needs a rallying moment. Strangely enough, 9/11 wasn't it. Maybe these three videos will fit the bill.

453 Tristan  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:46:10pm

#111

Can you explain why the majority of people "East of the Hudson" would willingly subject themselves to this crap? It's a good thing I'm on the other side and can tell that commission to shove it.

I would love to see such a committee be discussed at the state level by good old Elliot. He needs something to take the attention away from his continuing problems.

454 yenta-fada  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:49:15pm

The woman interrogating Ezra Levant had her mind made up before she ever sat down. I know this very Canadian mindset. It exists in every level of government in Canada; the NDPsocialists as well as the liberals have similar attitudes towards the supposed 'victims' of intolerance. Her body language (finger in front of her mouth is a negative sign, as was the previously noted crossing of arms in front) was consistent. There would have been nothing Ezra could have said to change her rigid little mind an iota. As it was, I think she was thoroughly confused by his barrage of legal knowledge. I'm thinking she was completely out of her depth the whole time. Certainly her mind slapped shut very early on. In my neighbourhood in Toronto during the last election, ALL of the signs were removed from lawns except the NDP signs. Sanctimonious and bent on revenge, that's Canada's socialists and their enablers.

455 solomonpanting  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:50:38pm

re: #53 WhiteRasta

re: #43 Nevergiveup

Incidentally, no has ever, ever, ever been found "not guilty" by these ass clowns.

No one. You think they are going to let the Jew off?

Not even in the ludicrous examples cited by Levant: the "offended" customer, the Hepatitis case.

Ezra Pounds HRC

456 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 5:55:18pm

re: #439 medaura18586

Please be careful. Know your rights first and make sure you do not commit any "hate crimes". Do not commit anything to paper that could be considered under the law as slanderous or libelous (find out what the laws are).

Keep a cool head and consult some older people with experience with this type of thing (if you know any).

The wrong move could get you kicked out of your university. At the worst, your life could be threatened; at the least, you could be seriously humiliated.

I've worked at a board of education. Think Communist Russia or China without the power to kill you but with a similar mindset. I'm not exaggerating.

Choose your battles carefully and fight them wisely. You're in this for the long haul and you need an education and a career.

(Sorry for the unsolicited advice.)

457 everlasting gobstopper  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:03:51pm

That this video exists, and is available to the public at large is FANTASTIC!

Is/was video taping sessions common practice for tribunals like this one? I wonder if videotaping will be permitted in the future, as I'm certain this one will be referred to frequently in many venues. It's an instant classic!


Mr. Levant was brilliant! BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO!

458 Jimmah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:04:50pm

re: #456 Josephine

Good advice. I suspect though, medaura is smart enough to be able to kick this scumbag's ass without breaking any real laws (and then some).

459 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:07:33pm

re: #428 Joseph

btw, this isn't the first time I've seen WoG say something defeatist and moronoic like that. I'm afraid that with such folks on our side, we will never win the battle that looms.


He made one comment Joe and stated his opinion. Your comment is equivalent to throwing the baby out with the bath-water. We are all having a discussion, and you're ready to crucify WOG for one comment you disagree with?

Take it easy.

460 ScottSA1158  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:08:39pm

Absolutely brilliant performance by Ezra. Kudos!

461 solomonpanting  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:09:55pm

BTW, I believe WrathofG-d be a person of the female persuasion.

462 USBeast  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:13:40pm

re: #422 Lauraf

re: #367 USBeast

I'm sort of surprised Levant even showed up for the hearing. I'd have shredded the summons and sent it back to them with a rude suggestion of what they could do with it. Then, if they got shirty about it I'd turn it into a media circus.

"All those who doeth evil hateth the Light." John:...something or other.

Yeah, well that would be like not bothering to show up if someone sued you. It doesn't mean the proceeding would stop.

Of course it wouldn't stop. That's the whole point. It should proceed under the brightest light of all the publicity Levant can muster. This kind of idiocy must be exposed to the largest possible audience.

463 minuteman  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:17:17pm

Speaking truth to power! Way to go Ezra Levant. That stalinist hack is out of her league. She an her quisling ilk must be political destroyed.

Can't wait to see what Mark Steyn does to these scum. Time to take back our rights!

464 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:18:16pm

re: #456 Josephine

re: #458 Jimmah

Thanks for the unsolicited advice. I was being hotheaded back then... I am certainly not going to literally spit on his face or drop a stink bomb at his office. I had a brilliant idea about a controversial poster to put up around campus a while back... I am saying it in "virtual public" here since I know I will never do it: it was going to be a picture of a girl in a burqa/hijab, with a blurb on the side, calling other girls "uncovered meat" who deserve to be raped, daring to tantalize every man in their path by exposing their face and hair. Of course, it would have a disclaimer and whatnot. The idea was that the university would be so outraged by this, that they would check the security cameras on the very public spots I would disseminate them. And when they did, they would find a girl in a full-body burqa doing it! (me)

I still think it's pretty brilliant and ironic, because it stir one level of shit, and then prove another point: i.e how the burqa has clear implications for criminals.

I never went through with it, of course. It's just an innocuous thought crime. Not only I could get kicked out of university, but I am an international student there, and I am applying for the green card in the summer. Getting caught could jeopardize my immigration status.

I do plan to hold an event/debate about it though, at least just so I can screen these great Ezra videos in the great hall of the Student Life Centre (the campus community hall). But I will be very careful about it...

You are right though. I know the mentality of the university's administration and I am smart enough to always err on the side of caution with these people.

465 infidelia  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:20:16pm

re: #456 Josephine

re: #439 medaura18586

Please be careful. Know your rights first and make sure you do not commit any "hate crimes". Do not commit anything to paper that could be considered under the law as slanderous or libelous (find out what the laws are).

Keep a cool head and consult some older people with experience with this type of thing (if you know any).

The wrong move could get you kicked out of your university. At the worst, your life could be threatened; at the least, you could be seriously humiliated.

I've worked at a board of education. Think Communist Russia or China without the power to kill you but with a similar mindset. I'm not exaggerating.

Choose your battles carefully and fight them wisely. You're in this for the long haul and you need an education and a career.

(Sorry for the unsolicited advice.)

Better yet: don't get caught. Ridicule from an unidentifiable source is much more effective at producing frustration and humiliation in the long run.

Um... anybody know how the Pats are doing?

466 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:21:15pm

re: #442 Stringart

#399 Josephine

These commissions were established under a Liberal government, so I don't understand why you're bringing the Conservatives into this as if they were to blame.

Alberta hasn't had a Liberal government since the 1920s. The PCs most certainly are to blame for the AHRC.

Thanks for clarifying that for me.

The Canadian Human Rights Commission was established by the federal Liberals to administer the Canadian Human Rights Act (in the 1970s).

467 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:26:20pm

re: #458 Jimmah

Thanks.

Not knowing medaura18586, I wouldn't be able to guess.

For example, this statement might be hyperbole but, if acted upon, could be a huge, life-altering mistake: "I will put up posters on campus to denounce this scumbag!", bearing in mind that the scumbag is a member of the faculty.

468 Lauraf  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:29:41pm

re: #462 USBeast

re: #422 Lauraf


re: #367 USBeast

I'm sort of surprised Levant even showed up for the hearing. I'd have shredded the summons and sent it back to them with a rude suggestion of what they could do with it. Then, if they got shirty about it I'd turn it into a media circus.

"All those who doeth evil hateth the Light." John:...something or other.


Yeah, well that would be like not bothering to show up if someone sued you. It doesn't mean the proceeding would stop.

Of course it wouldn't stop. That's the whole point. It should proceed under the brightest light of all the publicity Levant can muster. This kind of idiocy must be exposed to the largest possible audience.

I agree. Apparently Levant's lawyer had to do some serious legal manouevering to get the video made, and I'll bet AHRC will raise hell about it being made public.

The very fact that all of this is supposed to take place behind closed doors is also contrary to the fundamental legal principles of Canada.

469 Jimmah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:34:51pm

re: #464 medaura18586

I still think it's pretty brilliant and ironic, because it stir one level of shit, and then prove another point: i.e how the burqa has clear implications for criminals.

That could be extremely farcical. I like your thinking!

470 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:42:00pm

re: #469 Jimmah

I know, eh! I always itch to do it, and there is no conceivable way of getting caught. But still too risky for me. Now that I shared the idea with the rest of the world, I definitely can't do it. But yeah, the thinking is to subvert the enemy.

471 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:42:16pm

re: #434 Orde

re: #262 lifeofthemind


re: #245 Slumbering Behemoth
re: #238 lifeofthemind
I nearly forgot that part. I won't be buying any IBM products until they clean house. Get to it, IBM!

Not calling for any secondary boycotts, they don't do any good anyway. It is reputation and publicity that matters. I'm confident that 95% of IBM management know nothing of this. If any lizards can get the word to them they may act.


Man, just when I was starting to forget about IBM's role in aiding the Holocaust another ugly IBM hate connection comes along.

IBM was not the only company sucked in - Wall Street was loaning money to Hitlers Germany as well to pay for all these goodies.

As a former IBMer - I will be calling White Plains NY Monday AM and make sure the 95% who may not know - know. I have forwarded this link to many retired IBMers earlier today.

Elmasry needs his chain jerked. Hard.

There is an IBM employee with the same last name in the Armonk NY office.

472 infidelia  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:47:54pm

14" nor'easter headed my way Monday and it's my day off. No need to let my hands touch a shovel all day. Yeeehaaa!

G'night, lizards!

474 idbeholdi  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:51:58pm

The video's look like they've been removed. :-(

475 idbeholdi  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:52:52pm

Well, they did not work on the front page, but work on the comments page.

476 konservo  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:53:43pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

He-he. I gave you a plus, however, I would also add that in addition to being passionate (arrogant and obnoxious, as you say) he is also informed and articulate, and that is what really counts in my book.

477 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:55:18pm

re: #473 DistantThunder

awesome! That was EXACTLY what I was talking about. If he plays nice with them, if he goes through the hoops in that circus, he would be granting them legitimacy! His defiance is premeditated, and it's the POINT of the debate. That's why I was so pissed when WrathOfG_D called Ezra rude and obnoxious.

478 canadianally  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:55:44pm

Bush hatred running amok at the G & M:

[Link: www.theglobeandmail.com...]

Comments are open if you are into playing with trolls.

479 Kenneth  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 6:58:25pm

re: #471 Bobibutu

Mohamed Elmasry is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Waterloo in Canada. He heads the radical Canadian Islamic Congress which CLAIMS to speak for Canadian Muslims, but does not. The rival Canadian Muslim Congress presents a much more moderate point of view, and the 2 groups are constantly arguing between each other.

480 Jimmah  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:02:44pm

re: #470 medaura18586

Yeah, you never know - some burka clad muslimas could catch a sight of the poster as you were putting it up and rumble the scheme - better safe than sorry. But it's satisfying just to reflect on how easily it could be done, and how effective it would be in proving the point.

Anyway, that's time for me to go...laters.

481 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:03:55pm

The new video is great! The woman looks defeated, perhaps humiliated. I think she realized she lost the moment as he started questioning her authority: she had taken her moral superiority for granted from the start. I am not a great fan of Ayn Rand, but this reminds me of the trial of Hank Reardan in Atlas Shrugged. The farcical prosecutors lose their power and prestige as soon as the moral foundation of their authority is questioned by someone who knows what he is talking about... because their authority is really only in the eyes of the beholders.

In the end, she is awkward and apathetic, and doesn't know how to react. Being indifferent on the surface is her desperate way of holding on to whatever bit of power she thinks she has left over him.

482 allan5oh  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:06:52pm

Here's a post on ezras blog( [Link: www.ezralevant.com...] ):

Dear Ezra,

Muslims Against Sharia consider proceedings against you a sad joke. Canadian justice system stooped to a new low, which is not surprising since appeasing Islamic extremists seems to be the prevalent theme of the twenty first century. It's not much, but we want you to know that there are Muslims who are on your side.

Khalim Massoud
President
Muslims Against Sharia

[Link: www.reformislam.org...]

[Link: muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com...]

interesting.

483 somaking  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:07:34pm

Brilliant analysis by Ezra Levant of the Obama phenomena.

484 canadianally  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:11:46pm

I sent an email to the AHRC:

After watching this video I think you are the proper organization to contact:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

See, my concern is that I suspect someone of thinking of freedom of speech. Is there something we can do?

---

Fools of the highest order. Make sure to throw the moonbats a bone here too:

[Link: www.theglobeandmail.com...]

485 UberInfidel67  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:20:47pm

Damn, I just got here and it says the videos are "no longer available". Would that be just here or all over the cyber-world?

486 LiveFreeOrDie  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:21:31pm

Wow, that rocked.

487 mj  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:25:09pm

Mark Steyn on Ezra Levant's interrogation:

"The last house of worship torched in Edmonton was my synagogue" [Mark Steyn]


I've been in the wilds away from the Internet all day, but I wanted to draw attention to this - yesterday's interrogation of my old boss Ezra Levant by one of Canada's many "human rights commissions" for publishing the Danish cartoons. Much to the irritation of the Alberta thought police, Ezra has posted portions of the video at his site (start at the top and scroll down - or, if that's too busy, try radio station CHQR). There are three sections, starting with Ezra's opening statement, which points out that his freedom of speech is not the gift of Canadian bureaucrats but an inalienable right bolstered by 800 years of English Common Law as well as more modish documentation such as the UN's Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

Then come two sections - one in which "human rights agent" Shirlene McGovern quizzes him on his intent in publishing the cartoons, and another in which she raises the fear that his publishing them could lead to violence against Muslims “particularly in today’s world post-9/ 11 that has made a number of Muslims more vulnerable to hatred and contempt”.Ezra's answer speaks for itself, but Ms McGovern's question reminds me of a passage from Melanie Phillips' book Londonistan:

Minority-rights doctrine has produced a moral inversion, in which those doing wrong are excused if they belong to a 'victim' group, while those at the receiving end of their behaviour are blamed simply because they belong to the 'oppressive' majority.

Ms McGovern, a blandly unexceptional bureaucrat, is a classic example of the syndrome. No "vulnerable" Canadian Muslim has been attacked over the cartoons, but the cartoonists had to go into hiding, and a gang of Muslim youths turned up at their children's grade schools, and Muslim rioters around the world threatened death to anyone who published them, and even managed to kill a few folks who had nothing to do with them. Nonetheless, upon receiving a complaint from a Saudi imam trained at an explicitly infidelophobic academy and who's publicly called for the introduction of sharia in Canada, Shirlene McGovern decides that the purely hypothetical backlash to Muslims takes precedence over any actual backlash against anybody else.

Thus the unending valse macabre of our times, as the supposedly progressive forces of tolerance are whirled around the floor by the avowedly intolerant. Ezra is rightly contemptuous of these "human rights commissions". Canadians should be ashamed of this show trial.

[Link: corner.nationalreview.com...]

488 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:27:29pm

re: #473 DistantThunder

re: #388 WriterMom

VISIT EZRA'S BLOG FOR SUPPORT

New video on his site - Ezra calls her a THUG!

Wow. Charles, if you are still up, maybe an update?

489 tigermoth42  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:34:42pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

OF COURSE he had to be that rude. That's the whole point. That you have the right to be rude / offensive. Not that this is something to which we aspire, but that in a classically liberal society (you know, back before 'liberal' was a synonym for insane) we must tolerate ideas which we find personally offensive.

490 jalarky  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:37:41pm

The painting in the hearing room violates human rights. Its rural scenery oppresses those from urban climes.

491 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:37:46pm

re: #479 Kenneth

THX ... I'ma loading up for Monday.
;-)

492 Josephine  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:39:11pm

re: #464 medaura18586

An event/debate sounds like a great idea.

493 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:42:59pm

re: #474 idbeholdi

The video's look like they've been removed. :-(

These?
Opening Statement
What was your intent?
The real violence in Edmonton
I don't answer to the state

Looks like Google/Youtube is hotlinking to [Link: www.ezralevant.com...]
for that last one. What? Is Google hard up for resources? Or is this a deliberate DoS strategy? If so, it stinks.

494 medaura18586  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:48:12pm

[Link: digg.com...]

Anyone with a Digg account, here's your shot! (I for one don't have an account)

495 Maine's Michael  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:48:59pm

Wow.

Please keep us posted as to how this turns out, Charles.

496 astronmr20  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 7:59:03pm

re: #471 Bobibutu

Honestly,

What can IBM do about this? Nothing, the way I see it.

497 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:04:49pm

re: #496 astronmr20

re: #471 Bobibutu

Honestly,

What can IBM do about this? Nothing, the way I see it.

True - however upper management may frown on this negative publicity and link to IBM and decide that further contracts with him are not in the best interest of the shareholders.

That in a nutshell is going to be my Monday AM Rant.

498 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:05:57pm

re: #494 medaura18586

From your Digg link, the new (4th) video seems to have a "normal" YouTube link:
Ezra Levant does not answer to the State - (Canadian HRC)
The identifier part appears to match what I posted in my #493, so perhaps the &eurl= -part is inconsequential.

499 Pavel49  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:21:28pm

I want to be Ezra when I grow up. Seriously, I have asked my 24 year old daughter to watch the video to see real "speaking truth to power" She is a good, well grounded, engineer type but needs to be bolstered by real world examples. Lots of her friends are Toofers and "progressives".

500 abolitionist  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:28:06pm

thug - Wikipedia disambiguation page says

Thug may refer to:

* Thug, (%u0920%u0917), a member of the defunct Indian cult Thuggee
* Thug, slang for a gangster or a petty thief
* Thug, a gardening term meaning an over-vigorous plant that spreads excessively

That one certainly fits.

501 Seerak  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:37:20pm

Wow. I am suddenly more optimistic about my countrymen.

You anti-immigration types ought to consider making it *easier* for men like this to escape to America. Both they and your country would be better for it.

502 exredtory  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:39:33pm

The inquisitrix is Shirlene McGovern, a Vancouver immigration lawyer.

Here is a previous AHRC case she was in: [Link: calsun.canoe.ca...]

503 Bobibutu  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:43:31pm

re: #501 Seerak

Wow. I am suddenly more optimistic about my countrymen.

You anti-immigration types ought to consider making it *easier* for men like this to escape to America. Both they and your country would be better for it.

We welcome him and his family with open arms.

I would imagine that there are a thousand or three that would welcome the chance to be sponsors in a heartbeat.

504 Daisy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:43:43pm

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

You must be kidding! I hope to heavens that if you were to get dragged into a 'mind-crime' court, have to miss work and pay high legal fees - not to mention deal with this sulkingly stupid beaurocrat (while the imam who has dragged you there gets to do so courtesy of his dhimmified Canadian slaves who have footed the bill - meaning you'd paid that way too) you'd be twice as 'obnoxious'.

505 Jim708  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:45:22pm

re: #438 infidelia

See, this is why I voted the Commish for the Fiskie. As malevolent and fascistic as the Leftard commentators and Islamist camp followers may be, the smug, arrogant bureauwhore conducting this interrogation is in a position of control over Ezra's freedom and the quality of his life. There is no issue of his being rude or "obnoxious". This was not some dinner party conversation. This overnment flunkie was interrogating him unlawfully, as he notes in his opening statement. He would be perfectly with his rights if he reached over and b***h-slapped her into unconsciousness. Same as if she aimed a gun at him and demanded his money, except that she wants his money and his silent obedience. At this stage we err greatly if we treat these little fascist functionaries with anything but the contempt they deserve because it adds to their delusion that they have the right to treat us as criminals. Does anyone watching her doubt that she believes nobody has the right to ever offend her?

To #42 newsjunkie_ky

Shrink a "Mo da Bomb" T-shirt and put it on the Ozzie bobblehead. Voila!

That is exactly why I voted for the CHRC. The Paul Nuts and Rosie can rant and froth at the mouth all they want and the only ones that hear them are those that want to.

When a quasi-legal entity like a HRC puts its two bits worth in, then we are in a different realm.

506 venezuela lover  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:46:11pm

Ezra Levant needs to run for president of the United States. Excellent speech. Excellent.

507 Daisy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 8:48:47pm

re: #490 jalarky

The painting in the hearing room violates human rights. Its rural scenery oppresses those from urban climes.

Ha! Glad you mentioned the painting. That painting violates everything a painting ought to be (beautiful, disturbing etc.) It is perhaps the single most boring piece of crap I've seen in quite some time .. although it sort of matches the mood of the Inquisition Room, expressing as it does the banality of evil.

508 freewesterncanada  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 9:14:30pm

re: #504 Daisy

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

You must be kidding! I hope to heavens that if you were to get dragged into a 'mind-crime' court, have to miss work and pay high legal fees - not to mention deal with this sulkingly stupid beaurocrat (while the imam who has dragged you there gets to do so courtesy of his dhimmified Canadian slaves who have footed the bill - meaning you'd paid that way too) you'd be twice as 'obnoxious'.

Damm right, Our charter of rights "claims" freedom of the press, thought etc is a "fundamental right".

That this happened is BS! And why immigration needs to be stopped.

EUrabia is on it's way to Canada, too!

many links about this here.

509 ShyGuy  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 9:24:23pm

We need to exhume Gregory Peck or Spencer Tracey to make a movie about this. Of course, after all these years, they'll need to brush up a little.

510 Canadastani  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 9:30:44pm

Brilliant. The fact that this inquiry is even happening is a horror - as Orwellian, Stalinist, and so forth as he says. The fact that Ezra is taking it on so directly - stating that reserves the full right to offend is fantastic. He is quite articulate and states his points well.

511 MigueldowninMexico  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 9:53:02pm

Someone addressed this email to the "Comission"

Sirs:
I'm sooo glad to be a Mexican! Here in Mexico we don't have such Hitlerian Inquisition as your "Human Rights" Comission.
Do you have a portrait of Hitler in your main building? O, wait a minute, it must be one of Stalin and Mohammed hugging each other and kissing in the mouth, right?
You are a disgrace. From a free country like Mexico I feel so bad for poor Canada, who once was a bastion of freedom and now has become a cesspool of stalinist and muslim (the same) prosecution of freedom of speech.
Bu bye Canada, very soon you will become a part of the sharia nightmare. We'll miss you among the list of free nations in the world.

512 Mambo Bananapatch  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 10:58:42pm

Wouldn't it be nice if Steyn does the same thing at his questioning? In fact, if everybody who got haled before an HRC for thought crimes videotaped themselves bitch-slapping their interrogators, the latter might get tired of being humiliated and leave the former alone.

Of course, if they were really Stalinists, they'd simply forbid people from videotaping or otherwise documenting their hearings. Watch for that.

513 aRedPhishHead  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 11:01:24pm

Hear Hear!

Great vids.

514 mrclark  Sat, Jan 12, 2008 11:35:50pm

re: #6 WhiteRasta

Thank you Charles for exposing the kangaroo court of Canada.

This is a stinking disgrace.

Steyn is next!

LOL...

Steyn will tear her a new asshole. Better video tape that one...it'll be a keeper.

popcorn anyone?

515 Christoph  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 3:01:53am

re: #18 WrathofG-d

Ok, this guy is a bit rude.

I support his purpose...but he didn't need to be so arrogant and obnoxious about it.

You don't get it at all do you?

516 student  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 5:50:46am

Wow. That was great. As someone emailed the Instapundit, it reminds me of Howard Roark's speech to the divorce court in Rand's The Fountainhead. If everyone refused to be intimidated by these swaggering jackboots, the HRC would die away.

517 phoenixgirl  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 7:26:12am

i think "this guy" Ezra Levant, showed great restraint. trying to explain the obvious is a difficult task. especially when the person you are explaining it to doesn't care.

518 FlyingTigress  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 8:00:04am

Oh G_d.

As someone who works for a "gub'mint" agency, I recognize that type of bureaucrat -- right down to her body English.

She's already made up her mind and is just going through the motions.

519 deacon  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 8:12:00am

I would like to see him state that he is offended by being questioned by "uncovered meat" and see what her reaction would be.

520 mikevp  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 8:47:50am

Somebody ought to make a version of that "Mo Cartoon Bobblehead" with the fuse on top that is an actual firework. (Does anyone outside China make fireworks any more, though?)

521 itsjustme  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 9:30:45am

Charles,

Please post the video where the interrogator says to Ezra "You're entitled to your opinions."

WOW.

522 J.S.  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 10:16:45am

Way to go Ezra!

When I watch this, I feel like mailing back my Canadian citizenship papers...and just proclaim myself as an unabashed American...

523 SteveB  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 10:41:18am

Wow. 4 Cheers for Ezra Levant! (Is he related to Oscar? Oscar probably would have thought the same things.) Thank you, Charles, for posting these comments. I teach at a local college here in Chicago, and I teach censorship issues. This will be required viewing.

524 roberth  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 10:43:45am

3rd video has been pulled from youtube. Anyone have another link to it?

525 UrbanRevival  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 10:46:17am

Where do I send my check?

526 roberth  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 10:48:58am

Never mind! must have been a time out. Links works fine.

This whole process is chilling. I bet Levant loses.

527 NR Pax  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 12:14:06pm

#512

Of course, if they were really Stalinists, they'd simply forbid people from videotaping or otherwise documenting their hearings. Watch for that.

I don't know how the law works over in Canada, but I have a feeling that if you go in with an attorney, they can argue that the hearings are going to be part of his client's defense.

And I hope Ezra goes after this commission once this has been thrown out of court and demands reimbursement of his legal fees.

528 Challenger  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 12:14:43pm

Excellent video! Thought, logic and reason vs. liberal fascism. I love the supreme irony that a "human rights comission" is prosecuting this complaint from Saudi trained haters.

529 HD Woman  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 7:24:04pm

HRC...HRC... HRC? Now why do those letters kinda make my skin start feeling all crawly?

530 BLBfootballs  Sun, Jan 13, 2008 7:45:23pm

God bless Ezra Levant!

531 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jan 14, 2008 7:04:37am

Way late to this one, but...

Did y'all catch the part in the second video link in which the Grand Inquisitress, responding to Levant's question about whether there was a possible answer to the "what was your intent" question that would be illegal, replies, "Well, anything is possible, I guess"?

WRONG ANSWER, LADY.

The law is supposed to be TRANSPARENT and PREDICTABLE, remember? We, the citizens, are supposed to be able to easily determine what is legal and illegal. It isn't supposed to be up to the discretion of some goddamn Star Chamber.

This is simply incredible.

Godspeed, Mr. Levant. Keep up the fight.

532 Bobibutu  Mon, Jan 14, 2008 10:31:23am

RE: Ezra Levant

I said I would call IBM this morning.

While unable to get thru to a manager I did get assistance and an email address.

Here is how I started mine with multiple links.

I invite all others who feel strongly to contact IBM as well.

concerns@us.ibm.com

There has been controversy for several years concerning Dr. Mohamed Elmasry.

This weekend he was linked to IBM.

IBM has never tolerated bad behavior on the part of employees or associates. I see no reason IBM should deviate from this long standing policy.

533 J.S.  Mon, Jan 14, 2008 3:14:14pm

re: #532 Bobibutu

Please explain how Elmasry (who resides in Ontario and is a professor at the University of Waterloo) fits in here -- with Ezra Levant and the Alberta Human Rights commission and a complaint filed by Syed Soharwardy? I don't see the link...


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

A kind of crazed and demented watchdog.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

Speed: It will turn you into your parents. -- 1970 public service announcement regarding drug (namely, speed) use

Barnes & Noble Deal of the Day