Wall Street Protest Begins, With Demonstrators Blocked

Politics • September 2011 • Views: 1,641

How bad has the New York Times gotten?…

For anyone with even peripheral knowledge of politics, they’d know that Lyndon LaRouche is not only NOT “right-wing”, but is, in fact, a registered Democrat with multiple appearances on Democrat tickets…

But the New York Times doesn’t want it to be known that other Democrats (no matter how loopy they are) are STILL DEMOCRATS…

…so they lie…and they lie…and they lie…

-2

Recent Pages by cnredd:
America 2.0 WaPo CHANGES Romney Story To Hide Lie Obama advisers debating gay marriage Media Union Sides With Occupy Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, and Information Order

Jump to bottom

5 comments

researchok Mon, Sep 19, 2011 1:15:58pm

First and foremost, Larouche is a lunatic and has been for decades.

However he describes himself politically is irrelevant.

cnredd Mon, Sep 19, 2011 1:37:30pm

But "how he describes himself" is not relevant...

It's the New York Times that are describing him...falsely...

Bob Levin Mon, Sep 19, 2011 1:57:58pm

re: #2 cnredd

Wait a second. You know how these pages knock Spencer and Geller, and the Tea Party? Well, back in the 70s and 80s, King Nutjob was LaRouche. He wasn't a Democrat or a Republican. He ran in every election as an Independent.

They were political Moonies.* I can at least see logic in the Tea Party. These guys...folks, you have no idea how bizarre conspiracy theories can get until you've met someone touched by LaRouche.

*Well, turns out that is a very old reference, and I'm not supposed to say Moonie anymore since it's considered derogatory. So, here's what it means, according to our old buddy Wikipedia:

The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (2005), The Concise New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (2007), and The Routledge Dictionary of Modern American Slang and Unconventional English (2008) give a secondary meaning as "any blind, unthinking, unquestioning follower of a philosophy."[16][17][18] In a 1996 article for The Independent in which he criticised former Prime Minister Edward Heath for speaking at a Unification Church sponsored conference, Andrew Brown commented: "The term 'Moonie' has entered the language as meaning a brainwashed, bright-eyed zombie."[19]

Randall Gross Mon, Sep 19, 2011 3:13:10pm

Larouche is really in his own anti-semitic universe, you won't find mainstream Democrats who support him and the great majority decry him, and you won't see him getting any party funds. Just as the GOP derided David Duke from Stormfront when he was running for office, the Dems deride Larouche. He's got his own movement and his registration as a Democrat is a convenience and not something you should describe him as. If anything he's closer to paleolibertarian Lew Rockwell than the democrats.

Bob Levin Mon, Sep 19, 2011 3:23:54pm

re: #4 Thanos

Did you ever meet his any of his followers? Same question to you Researchok?

He worked antisemitism in there too? I don't remember that part, but why not? It started with the Rockefellers, and then the Trilateral Commission, and somehow they discovered that I was tied to an international spy ring, but not because I was Jewish...fusion energy was tied in there somehow. It's like they put the jigsaw puzzle together with a hammer.

Auto

This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!