Pages

Jump to bottom

14 comments

1 dragonfire1981  Sun, Nov 18, 2012 1:10:27pm

Excellent page, very informative.

2 Destro  Sun, Nov 18, 2012 10:20:49pm

Ignore Israeli bombs in British hotels, please......

3 alinuxguru  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 6:14:32am

I never heard of the San Remo Conference. Thanks for sharing.

4 Destro  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 6:54:07am

re: #3 alinuxguru

Apparently, you also did not hear about the King David hotel bombing...

[Link: www.telegraph.co.uk...]

Israel celebrates Irgun hotel bombers

By Harry de Quetteville, in Jerusalem12:01AM BST 22 Jul 2006

In the midst of its campaign against Hizbollah and Hamas "terrorists", Israel has been accused by Britain of feting Jewish "terrorists" whose bomb attack killed 28 Britons 60 years ago today.

5 alinuxguru  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 7:33:42am

re: #4 Destro

Sorry, not taking the bait.

6 Buck  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 7:50:58am

re: #2 Destro

Ignore Israeli bombs in British hotels, please......

You ignore:

This land was not conquered through bloodshed by the Jews. Yes it was defended with blood. However that is hardly the same thing.

The land was already returned to the Jews. Due to an uprising in antisemitism Britain was not fulfilling its role in the Mandate.

I know that many recoil at the site of Jews defending their lives and rights. However at the time of the King David bombing (which was not a hotel at the time, but a British military office/target) Jews were fighting for their lives and defending the mandate.

7 Buck  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 11:38:43am

To label what Jews did 66 years ago as the same as the terror of today is the worst sort of slander I can imagine.

Perhaps if you can find examples of buses, restaurants, grade schools and airlines being attacked by Jews IN LONDON, you might have a point.

Maybe you can find example of Jews firing rockets into civilian neighborhoods in LONDON.

Lacking that, you might want to think long and hard about the differences.

Of all the land lost to the Ottoman Empire and returned to the inhabitants of the Middle East, the arabs were given more than 90%. In 1922-1924 they agreed to the deal that included Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. However the Arabs wanted it all. They planned in public to steal the sliver that was returned to the Jews. The planned in public to steal it with ethnic cleansing.

No one would come to the rescue of these Jews as they were slaughtered.

They had to defend themselves.

8 Destro  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 12:59:11pm

re: #6 Buck

You ignore:

This land was not conquered through bloodshed by the Jews. Yes it was defended with blood. However that is hardly the same thing.

You did not write "conquered", you wrote: "The country of Israel was actually created peacefully" CREATED.

Bombing a hotel, killing under a 100 people (I think 66?) is not a peaceful act.

9 Destro  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 12:59:45pm

re: #5 alinuxguru

Sorry, not taking the bait.

Reality is bait.

10 Destro  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 1:00:42pm

re: #7 Buck

To label what Jews did 66 years ago as the same as the terror of today is the worst sort of slander I can imagine.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

11 alinuxguru  Mon, Nov 19, 2012 1:02:56pm

re: #10 Destro

To be a freedom fighter one must be fighting for - you know - actual freedom.

12 Buck  Tue, Nov 20, 2012 6:55:25am

re: #8 Destro

You ignore:

This land was not conquered through bloodshed by the Jews. Yes it was defended with blood. However that is hardly the same thing.

You did not write "conquered", you wrote: "The country of Israel was actually created peacefully" CREATED.

Bombing a hotel, killing under a 100 people (I think 66?) is not a peaceful act.

That was not the creation of Israel, it was the defence of Israel and Jews.

And it was not a hotel. It was a military target.

13 Buck  Wed, Nov 21, 2012 7:09:13am

Destro, on this subject you have been nothing but Disingenuous, Duplicitous, and displayed a Double standard.

14 Flavia  Thu, Nov 22, 2012 10:25:08pm

re: #7 Buck

To label what Jews did 66 years ago as the same as the terror of today is the worst sort of slander I can imagine.

Perhaps if you can find examples of buses, restaurants, grade schools and airlines being attacked by Jews IN LONDON, you might have a point.

Maybe you can find example of Jews firing rockets into civilian neighborhoods in LONDON.

Lacking that, you might want to think long and hard about the differences.

Of all the land lost to the Ottoman Empire and returned to the inhabitants of the Middle East, the arabs [sic] were given more than 90%. In 1922-1924 they agreed to the deal that included Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. However the Arabs wanted it all. They planned in public to steal the sliver that was returned to the Jews. The planned in public to steal it with ethnic cleansing.

No one would come to the rescue of these Jews as they were slaughtered.

They had to defend themselves.

As you noted, the King David Hotel was British MILITARY HQ.
BUT, they ALSO they warned everyone to get out, ahead of time.
Sound familiar?
(There was, however, an answer: "We don't take orders from Jews." Ok....)


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
A Closer Look at the Eastman State Bar DecisionTaking a few minutes away from work things to read through the Eastman decision. As I'm sure many of you know, Eastman was my law school con law professor. I knew him pretty well because I was also running in ...
KGxvi
1 hour ago
Views: 67 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 1