Pages

Jump to bottom

6 comments

1 Rocky-in-Connecticut  Jun 26, 2014 3:18:37pm

so now a firmly Republican Congress will run the country from now on. This is what this boils down to. In order to get ANYTHING done, it will have to be the Republican’s way or no way. Shut down the Government and refuse to fill chairs will be the trump card proudly displayed every time another Presidential effort gets underway to fill a vacancy.

Congress has the ability with this SCOTUS decision to hijack the country by default- Libertarian right wingers love the prospect of shutting down the government as a natural reflex. Modern Republicans and their corporate backers don’t like the EPA? Refuse to authorize everyone the President names to lead it. Don’t like the DOE? Same thing. the Fed? Now the Tea Baggers are seeing blood in the water. Now we’re talking. No need to “audit” the Fed when you can just cripple it altogether by refusing to fill its vacancies. Better yet, demand a ideological partisan just to fill a seat.

This is another watershed SCOTUS decision and a potential critical flaw in the Constitution that encourages those that hold governing responsibilities as hostile to their own ideology. Combined with Citizen’s United decision we are now officially a Corporate banana republic.

2 missliberties  Jun 26, 2014 3:35:58pm

The only positive I can think of is that this would force the Congress to act like adults and actually become a functioning government body.

In other words, we are screwed.

Gallup just rated Congress approval at lowest ever. 7% So I guess the President is doing Great at 41, and Hillary looks like the new Queen of the Empire at 52?

3 Rocky-in-Connecticut  Jun 26, 2014 3:49:36pm

no chance- I mean NO chance a Republican Congress starts acting like responsible adults because they ARE NOT responsible adults- there has been an invasion of childish Tea Party/Libertarian 5 year olds who think all government = bad, any sort of mixed economy is the work of Satan, and Jesus will save us (the righteous) anyway.

These same people hold that corporations are (important) people, and that a non-functioning government is a good government. Corporate masters and Koch Bros are now firmly in control and will dictate to Republican Congressmen on who they block and who they pass to fill vacancies.

4 lostlakehiker  Jun 26, 2014 6:37:49pm

Banana republic is the term applied to nations where el presidente always gets his way.

That the court struck down the Obama administration’s arguments, 9-0, is good reason to think that this is not a right-wing nutjob ruling. Not unless you want to apply that name to even Obama’s own appointees.

A responsible president would not have made “recess appointments” in the teeth of the plain fact that the Senate was not in recess.

Questions of policy are secondary here. The primary question was whether or not the constitutional provision that the president must get the advice and consent of the senate for high-level appointments should be rendered a nullity.

The ruling will, ironically, put more pressure on Republicans in the Senate. Now, if they decide to make a game of holding up appointments, it won’t be a game. It will be in absolute earnest. There is no Plan B any more. There never should have been.

5 Wallysmom  Jun 26, 2014 8:37:11pm

And yes, all these monumental decisions made by the SCOTUS will backfire on the Republicans in the long term. You can object to the constitutionality of executive actions for things you don’t agree with but not to the appointment of necessary people to vacancies stonewalled in Congress. Democrats, with the remaining time they have, should attempt to pass a law that gives Congress a set time to allow vacancies to remain so, and then, if the position is not filled, allow the executive branch to do so. IF, and I believe it will be a LONG TIME FROM NOW, a Republican sits in the Oval Office, he/she will be sorry this decision was made by the Judicial Branch. Time for Ginsburg to retire and give her seat to someone who will fight for progressives.

6 Ace-o-aces  Jun 26, 2014 9:37:15pm

Republican presidents have made plenty of recess appointments. I don’t see this as a left/right issue. Basically SCOTUS is saying that if the president uses a bullshit technicality to make a recess appointment, the congress can use a bullshit technicality to block him.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
3 days ago
Views: 119 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 280 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1