What a fuitloop. He’s koo-koo for cocoapuffs.

re:

He showed me that a weapon of mass destruction is also when there are chemicals or biological particles within the atmosphere that no one can see, people are going about there business walking around Town, doing their shopping completely unaware of anything happening around them, yet in the atmosphere all around them there is something so devastating and destructive that the eye cannot see, which is causing mass destruction and devastation.

this part was a little creepy to me.

Hell, to be honest, the whole thing is creepy.

gman- I’m glad you’re shining this light again. What a freak post.

If God really talked to him then he probably made a killing today picking the Giants to win at Lambeau.

re:

re:

He showed me that a weapon of mass destruction is also when there are chemicals or biological particles within the atmosphere that no one can see

This guy is a weapon of mass destruction.

re:

Just consider it as another one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.

re:

Wow - I thought this guy was emotionally unhinged, this however reveals him as a complete and utter mentalist of the first degree.

There’s something strange going on here. Didn’t the popular use of the word “weapons of mass destruction” begin after 9/11? Yet we see it all through this article dated January 1, 2001.

Maybe I’m starting to hear voices too?

What impresses me most of all is that back in 2001 he was able to speak about the murder of the russian reporter Litvinenko (which happened last year) in the past tense. I think his post dating system is fucked. Either that or he’s da true proffit.

All of the 12 parts of his mini- epic on Terrorists in Luton are from 1 January 2001. Does this mean a foreshadowing of future events?

“Look at what happened to the Russian dissident Litvinenko who was murdered in London by someone when they released a nuclear chemical near him.”

Yet this is dated January 1, 2001.

Prescience? Or that date doesn’t apply to the whole text perhaps.

re: