From below:

re: #87 Joe Bacon ✅

No Labels Party Proposes Effort to Swing Election for Preferred Candidate After Voting Ends

In the unlikely event that no candidate reaches 270 electoral votes come November, centrist group No Labels has floated a reality in which the outcome of the election could hinge not on the will of the voters, but rather on which candidate might be more willing to cut a deal with the group. “It’s possible… that there could be negotiation to create a coalition government where electors get traded between different candidates to get somebody over 270,” No Labels chief strategist Ryan Clancy told NBC News. No Labels co-founder and former Rep. Tom Davis elaborated on the idea: “It could be, for example: ‘We’re going to build a border wall [and] not run deficits.’ Any number of things,” he said, adding that the group could “swing faithless electors over” in spite of the will of the voters.

thedailybeast.com

Yeah, let’s repeat the election of 1986, where after month’s of negotiation, 20 EV from Florida, Louisiana, Oregon, and South Carolina were given to Hayes so he beat Tilden by one EV. He became President - the GOP remained in control of the White House. The greatest percentage of Americans in history voted in that election, over 80% for Tilden but they were ignored. The compromise resulted in the end of Reconstruction and the destruction of minority rights in the US for almost a century.

Yeah, let’s do that. Assholes.