re: #997 rightside

I can certainly understand that the rudderless GOP should stop being the party of no (although they shouldn’t say yes to anything the dems propose).

Compromise though? To what extent?

OK dems, we’ll vote for TARP II, but instead of 1.5 trillion, we’ll compromise and only spend 1.3 trillion of the next generations money now, until TARP III comes out. Next fiscal budget, we’ll compromise and spend only 4 trillion, instead of 5.

I don’t think that’s fair, as Governor Huntsman is a fiscal conservative who has cut takes and spending in Utah. I highly doubt he’d advocate republicans voting for TARP.