re: #78 No Malarkey!

…
1) he can fund raise off of it and 2) he believes the sentence will be stayed pending his appeal, and if he wins in November he’ll never serve any time…
[Embedded content]

1) not a consideration*
2) not a consideration

The judge should follow the law.
The felon guy should be evaluated and treated exactly the same as any other person would be.

There is absolutely nothing about him that makes his situation special or “extenuating”.

Not that he was president
Not that he claims to have a lot of money
Not that he has a big mouth.

This is about the crime, the charges and the verdict.

* I wonder if anyone has consider the notoriety-for-profit law. First amendment plus elections it could be thorny