re: #95 Interesting Times

From what I gathered, they seem to like him because he feeds into their “environmentalists bad, petrochemicals good” mantra, and that, since his work initially prevented 1960s/70s “population bomb” predictions from coming true, AGW predictions re food supply disruptions are also wrong. In other words, increased conventional industrial agriculture (through magical increased “drill, baby drill” fossil fuels) will automatically save the world no matter how much population increases.

But I’m pretty sure the population bomb prediction will eventually become true. The world can only sustain so many human beings. But they deny that as well.