re: #86 sattv4u2

You equate two very different situations - one a criminal conspiracy where multiple participants were convicted of multiple felonies, the other, misleading answers in a deposition on a topic irrelevant to the facts of a frivolous lawsuit, and you presume because no Dems voted to convict in the latter, that no Dems would vote to convict a Democratic President in the former?

Your analogy is severely flawed, which is why it doesn’t support the conclusion.