re: #89 wheat-dogg

I am really quite offended anyone is thinking I had some ulterior motive in bringing up his past. I’m a former reporter. I was reporting facts. That’s all.

I just want to make sure we don’t change the subject from United to this guy’s past. And, as it’s been talked about here before, our “objectivity” can be colored by our experience or lack thereof. Would it not have been better just to say that he is a doctor?