I can’t stay long, but something in the article Charles quoted is making my head hurt: It talks about creation-science and evolution-science. Creation science? *blinks* Wut?

So I go to Wikipedia to try to halt the cognitive dissonance before my head explodes. It says:

Creation Science or scientific creationism is a branch of creationism, which attempts to provide scientific support for the Genesis creation narrative in the Book of Genesis and disprove generally accepted scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms about the history of the Earth, cosmology and biological evolution.

Doesn’t that by definition make it like un-science or anti-science or something? WTF? O_o