re: #86 thedopefishlives

Not quite. He is claiming that his “controversial” viewpoints on several historical issues were “censored” by the university. Among these is his treatise on 9/11, but as I understand it, he also wrote something about a smallpox plague that annihilated some local Indian population as being a government covert operation or some malarkey.

So he is claiming that rotten scholarship and fictitious “historical” accounts are covered by the First Amendment? Too bad he didn’t think ahead and switch to a professorship in Creative Writing or Speech and Drama before the s. hit the f.