re: #101 kirkspencer

Of course that leads us to the second item. I am willing to consider disallowing late period abortions on a specific set of circumstances: that another person (or the state, I’m not fussy) is willing to assume the sacrifice necessary to sustain the fetus. A forced dilation and delivery or delivery by c-section is, in that circumstance, something I might consider — with the additional caveat that all costs beyond that of the basic abortion are borne by the other party, not the biological host.

Since no other person or state can bear the ‘forced dilation and delivery or delivery by c-section’, that whole idea is horrific. Only for the ‘biological host’, of course.

Or was that sarcasm? ‘Cause right up to that point, I thought you were pretty reasonable.