re: #103 Dangerman (slowly converting a pool into a pond)

there’s no privilege anyway
it’s in a book
unless you block publication you can’t claim he can’t testify to what he’s going to publish

They could have claimed that this was covered under executive privilege and forced him to remove it from the book. Could this have been their strategy but someone in the administration who disagreed with the policy released the text before it could have been redacted?