re: #107 Anymouse

“For now, the campaign’s polling showed, too many voters described him in two words: ‘unqualified’ and ‘racist’”

Yunno, the “racist” part is still too subjective and to loaded a term. It just leads to an endless circular discussion pulling out all sorts of irrelevant and subjective definitions of the term “racism”.

But “unqualified” is entirely objective, neutral and applicable. Again folks: THIS MAN HAS NO LEGISLATIVE OR ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD TO REFER TO!!!!!

As for his business record, just list all his failed ventures:

Steaks
Mortgage
Gloves
Vodka
Taj Mahal
Casinos
Magazine
University
New Media
etc.

I see no point in letting the discussion go down the rathole of racism, just stick to the neutral and objective facts.