re: #114 EPR-radar

Too funny. Another amusing consequence is that Romney would have to disclose his tax returns in order to show how many votes he’s entitled to.

More to the point, Perkins talking about money voting in this farcical way is a bit of a side show. After all, money already does vote very effectively in the US.

Perkins seems to be simply suggesting that the rich should be able to buy votes without going through the trouble of waging ad campaigns or pretending they actually give a damn about the poor.