re: #101 marjoriemoon

But it seems like she was supposed to have disclosed her husband’s relationship with the bank (he sat on the Board) and then the Feds would decide if the bank would get the funding. If the Feds knew of the relationship and gave them money anyway, why is it her problem? If I’m understanding the issue is about money the bank received, supposedly with her influence.

Is sounds like it was a FORMER relationship of being on the board. The disclosure requirements are rather extensive for public figures. This is mostly due to former cases of corruption. It does make it a lot more difficult to influence peddle, but it also makes for a lot of minor oversights being blown out of proportion.