re: #27 researchok

Brooks takes a lot of heat because he backed a lot of Obama’s economic policies.

The argument against him (reduced) is that we went from a 3 trillion deficit to at least a 12 trillion deficit- and we don’t have a whole lot to show for it.

Also, we still have not addressed the third rail issues- social security, retirement ages,etc.

Seriously, someone who thinks Limbaugh and Beck are worth listening to are not going to thoughtfully consider whether Brooks lost credibility with them by supporting the administration’s economic policy.