re: #117 theye1

Given the evidence presented they couldn’t have gotten a guilty verdict, the evidence just wasn’t there. The prosecution did not present any evidence that contradicted Zimmerman’s account, it in fact had evidence that supported Zimmerman’s account.

This is untrue. First of all, Zimmerman has given conflicting accounts, so you’ll have to explain which of his contradictory accounts you mean. Second of all, his wounds were consistent with a single, or very few blows, and inconsistent with his head being slammed on the ground.

It certainly was a case where acquittal wasn’t out of the question, but you’re simply not telling the truth here.