re: #125 Charles

Charles, I was referring to this specific post and not your wider argument about GW. Your view on the subject is quite clear.

My point is that there are a lot of rational/moderate skeptics who aren’t motivated by this or that political agenda. So saying :”look who agrees with you skeptics, therefore you’re wrong” is not a valid argument IMHO. And it doesn’t prove anything on the existence/non existence of GW .

In contrast, Your older posts regarding the evolution/creationist debate were much more convincing; with links to some very enlightening, robust, detailed scientific debunking (that biology lecturer, James Randi etc.)
I can’t find any of that sort nowadays and that’s a shame.