re: #122 Nyet

She can’t concentrate on one thing.
The credibility of the AWOL story is one thing.
The authenticity of the memos is another - related, but separable - thing.

The ability to deal with nuance just isn’t in everyone’s toolkit. The memo wasn’t some kind of linchpin to the entire story about the preferential treatment Bush received in the TANG. These people are acting like logic doesn’t have a severability clause, that if they accept the memo was fake that means everything else surrounding the story collapses too.