re: #129 lrsshadow

No I just don’t believe that all scientific conclusions are correct and science has been wrong in the past. If you want to believe that all life is just a random series of lucky events that happened in the universe go ahead. That would be a belief.

Now if you want to talk about evolution that is a different story. There is plenty of evidence that life does “evolve” but to take that nugget of information and stretch it to explain everything about how life began that is where science becomes a religion.

Actually, evolution does not know how the first replicators arose. It also does not address the question. It picks up after that event.

As to how that happened. It is still a very open question.

As to the AGW, again the science is very well settled. It is not wrong. Popular media accounts of science is often wrong, the consensus of the entire legitimate scientific community as backed by the data and the evidence is not.

Why not look at the actual evidence. In my reply to you. I gave you several smoking guns. Could you please tell me why they are false?