re: #86 Prof. Backpfeifengesicht, PhD

It’s not about the report - the video is available online.

It sure is about the report. If it wasn’t clear then they should have written the article with the whole text and the context of how and when it was said. Also, since there are YouTubes, put those into the article and say something like “you be the judge” or the like.

Or, not do the report as slanted as it was and acting like it was all so very clear.

They were in a hurry to get some mileage out of the whole thing and this is what they have achieved: Mud.

It is bad journalism. Look how hard everyone is working to clarify the damn story.