re: #123 Sergey Romanov

It’s actually equivalent to intelligent design ploy. Not in the sense of whether things are designed or not, but in how the conclusion about the act of creation is based simply on denial of evolution. They try to deny evo, pretend this proves creation - ergo creation science.

Seems like an awful lot of logical gymnastics. Why not just admit believing in creation as a literal event as described in [insert religious tradition here]? I mean it’s not as if you’re actually fooling anyone by doing that, except maybe yourself…